Slashdot Mirror


The Pentagon Bans Huawei, ZTE Phones From Retail Stores On Military Bases (theverge.com)

The Pentagon is ordering retail outlets on U.S. military bases to stop selling Huawei and ZTE smartphones, citing security risks. "Huawei and ZTE devices may pose an unacceptable risk to the department's personnel, information and mission," a Pentagon spokesperson said in a statement to The Wall Street Journal. "In light of this information, it was not prudent for the department's exchanges to continue selling them." The Verge reports: U.S. military members can still buy Huawei and ZTE devices for personal use from other stores, as there's no outright ban on that for now. But the spokesperson elaborated that the Pentagon is considering whether it should send out a military-wide advisory about the devices. U.S. government officials have said that China could order its manufacturers to create backdoors for spying in their devices, although both Huawei and ZTE have denied the possibility. An anonymous source told the WSJ that military leaders are wary that Beijing could use ZTE and Huawei devices to locate soldiers' exact coordinates and track their movements. Huawei responded to the news in a statement to The Verge: "Huawei's products are sold in 170 countries worldwide and meet the highest standards of security, privacy and engineering in every country we operate globally including the U.S. We remain committed to openness and transparency in everything we do and want to be clear that no government has ever asked us compromise the security or integrity of any of our networks or devices."

86 comments

  1. See comment ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Nazis banned the Jews from playing in any of their reindeer games. :(

    1. Re:See comment ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "no government has ever asked"
      Of course not. China is not a democracy. If they want you to do something, they don't ask you to do it; they tell you to do it.

  2. Surely that's a lie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "We remain committed to openness and transparency in everything we do and want to be clear that no government has ever asked us compromise the security or integrity of any of our networks or devices."

    Really? I thought the US government was going hammer-and-tongs on every tech company trying to back door their encryption.

    1. Re:Surely that's a lie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      committed to openness and transparency in everything - lies. Open source your code to prove it.
      If Broadcom is involved, there is a binary blob of code for the modem side of things - it could have anything in it. As far as I know, there is NO modem chip with open source drivers. Probably because people could write their own crypto or embed messages.
      If they were they would open source their code and timers with respect to logs.
      You can install backdoors, but delays and latency will show up in the logs. It will be different when mobile phones come with diagnostic logs so people can see tower ID and number of hops. (Bye Bye stingray). As Huawei is being blackballed, maybe they can offer valued privacy features not found on any phone. As their market growth is being capped-hard - maybe they should try harder.

    2. Re:Surely that's a lie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and they can't do that to foreigners like Huawei, so ban them instead. Spooks want to know what those military types get up to.

    3. Re:Surely that's a lie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We remain committed to openness and transparency in everything we do and want to be clear that no government has ever asked us compromise the security or integrity of any of our networks or devices."

      Really? I thought the US government was going hammer-and-tongs on every tech company trying to back door their encryption.

      there is a difference between what is stated officially and what is the unofficial truth :-)

  3. Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What guarantee is there that other brands/models don't pose security risks as well? How does one know that Google, Samsung, Apple, aren't mole-ridden? All it takes is one deliberate, hidden 'bug'.

    1. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen this Slashdot video yet? Have you bought the family freindly Goat C shirt?

      - FatCashewsLoveMe

    2. Re:Security by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      What guarantee is there that other brands/models don't pose security risks as well?

      There are no "guarantees" in computer security, only probabilities. You work to minimize risk, but you can't eliminate it.

      American devices may have bugs, and they may even have intentional backdoors, but those backdoors are not there at the behest of a foreign government.

      Huawei and ZTE need to do more to show that their code is clean. That means external code reviews, and cryptographic signatures to guarantee that the code in the ROM matches the official binary compiled from the certified source.

    3. Re:Security by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      PRISM showed who tame most big brands are. Happy to help the US gov spy.
      The problem for the US gov is that the same police access to any phone is now global.
      Other nations are watching US contractors for free around US bases, ports, forts, camps on US networks.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re: Security by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Google and Apple, and Microsoft and Oracle need to do that, too?

      Which entity presides over this code review process? A United Nations panel with reprwsentatives from the US, China, Russia and Zaire? Or does the process break down by national boundaries? The NSA should approve ALL software allowed in the US and the Chinese equivalent for all software in China?

    5. Re: Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing the Russians aren't capable of making phones, eh Ivan?

    6. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      MODDOWN! ; creimer spam post again!

      creimer wants you to click on his youtube channel, then click on his stupid amazon affiliate link spam on Youtube. There is nothing of value on creimer youtube channel. Only creimer click-bot goes there.

      creimer, I reported you to youtube and amazon and I keep reporting every spam post you make so all these spam posts will do is bring your view count in negative territory for a given day since youtube barred your stupid click-bot and your spam posts.

  4. Backdoors by sit1963nz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The USA wants to ensure that the only backdoors are theirs.
    It is important for the paranoid letter spaghetti agencies to be able to track, trace and intercept everyone in the USA because you are all potential enemies of the state.

    The flip side of this is that US technology should not be trusted any more than Chinese technology.

    1. Re:Backdoors by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The flip side of this is that US technology should not be trusted any more than Chinese technology.

      Just imagine the outcry though if China had banned the sale of the iPhone giving the same reasons! These sort of national security type arguments are likely to end up backfiring on the US when other governments start to apply the same logic.

    2. Re:Backdoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Re-read any of the linked stories... They didn't ban the sale of these devices nationwide - they only said that the Defense Department's own stores would stop selling them. You can still get them as bestbuy or amazon or wherever. Just not directly from the Government.

    3. Re:Backdoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it that we're afraid of the software, but somehow we can't be afraid of hardware back doors? I don't get it. That is the perfect place to hide something. Nearly impossible to audit, can be slipped in at the last minute right before the silicon dies are made.

    4. Re:Backdoors by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      And given the number of time the letter spaghettis have been caught illegally spying on its own citizens etc etc etc other governments are right to question US products security.

      Maybe the best option is to have a Chinese made firewall backed by a US firewall backed by a German firewall backed by a Russian firewall........

    5. Re:Backdoors by sit1963nz · · Score: 1
    6. Re:Backdoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. They did the same thing with Obama, or do you nitwit lefties already forget his rather public endorsing Blackberry?

      Call it what you want but I don't trust Chinese made ANYTHING. They've been fucking the world over for so long people seem to forget what quality actually means.

      If companies who import this shit were actually held responsible when .. I don't know, the paint ends up containing lead or the batteries explode, then maybe the real cost of doing business with Asia would be understood. As it stands now, they can and do offload all of that risk.

    7. Re:Backdoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just imagine the outcry though if China had banned the sale of the iPhone giving the same reasons!

      If Trump continue to play his trade war game, this might really happen.

    8. Re:Backdoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all. Cisco is just hardware and proprietary software. That means you could have endless numbers of backdoors in the software, not need to make it complex and be at the hardware level. (Cisco is relatively a low-volume product compared to cell phones.)

    9. Re:Backdoors by sit1963nz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ROTFLMAO, you change China/Chinese to USA in your statement and it also reads True.

      Have a read about how radioactive depleted Uranium shells the USA has been using in other countries is.
      As why Trump is rolling back emission standards for cars and giving assistance to coal.
      Check to see how much drinking water is contaminated because of fracking, lead, and other industrial contaminants.

    10. Re:Backdoors by sit1963nz · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And what Amy also happen is the US access to rare earth materials needed for modern electronics also becomes hard to buy as China stops the US from being able to buy it.

    11. Re: Backdoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China allowed the iPhone because it is backdoored.

    12. Re:Backdoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed... but it is not just limited to US citizens.. everybody else on this planet are apparently ALSO considered potential enemies... sad really...

    13. Re:Backdoors by clarkholmes · · Score: 1

      So the question becomes, who makes a phone that could be trusted?

    14. Re:Backdoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ban the iPhone? Never.

      Apple gave in and lets the CCP monitor the users because they want to sell devices.

      Google, to date, has not allowed user monitoring, and is blocked. if Google allowed the CCP into the datacenters apple would become irrelevant as only a small percent of the population can afford iPhones. Low cost android devices are all over the place.

    15. Re:Backdoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no one.

    16. Re:Backdoors by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      They didn't ban the sale of these devices nationwide

      I never said they did. My point still stands whether it be a nationwide ban or a more limited ban. However, you cannot guarantee that a response will be limited in quite the same fashion which is how these things escalate.

    17. Re:Backdoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be hilarious if china were to apply the logic to american tech as america applies to non-american tech.. I really really really hope that China DO find some entertaining way of responding to this... Then I will sit back here in Europe with popcorn and watch the show! :-)

    18. Re:Backdoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has only a couple percent less than Europe. Not as poor as you think.

    19. Re:Backdoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like your Chinese made Iphone...

    20. Re:Backdoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be tempted to do the same here in Canada but the concern is that the firework show might be a bit too close for comfort!

  5. No possibility of government coersion? by larryjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    U.S. government officials have said that China could order its manufacturers to create backdoors for spying in their devices, although both Huawei and ZTE have denied the possibility.

    It may be true that these Chinese companies do not currently implement government-mandated backdoors in their products, and it may be true that they truly would resist such government mandates. However, the assertion that such coercion is not possible is not believable. It's not believable for US companies, and it's not believable for Chinese companies.

    1. Re:No possibility of government coersion? by green1 · · Score: 2

      But why would you single out 2 Chinese manufacturers vs every other manufacturer out there? Keep in mind that there are ZERO phones made entirely in a jurisdiction under US control.

    2. Re:No possibility of government coersion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The employees and executives of Apple, for instance, are under US jurisdiction. They answer to US authority despite the fact that make their products in China. The employees and executives of Samsung are under South Korean jurisdiction, a nation that is closely allied with the US and over which the US has great power. They will answer to the US despite the fact that they make their products in China.

      Despite the misguided grant of MFN trading status, China is not an ally of the US and Huawei and ZTE employees and executives do not answer to US authority. Further, the DOD is not obligated to play fair in matters of national security, which may account for why, for instance, Lenovo products are not also banned. The DOD is permitted to make judgement calls based on information to which you are not — and will not be made — privy. The world is not a great big romper room where fairness always prevails and you are not owed an explanation for every decision. These realities will become increasingly clear to you as you mature.

    3. Re:No possibility of government coersion? by Junta · · Score: 2

      You are sorely mistaken if you think American executive is in any way a deterrent from China attempting anything. Not to say China would do it, but the American execs are too busy counting their money to care or delegate caring about what their Chinese suppliers are doing.

      From China's perspective, they have so many channels to inject things into the supply chains through component vendors no one has even heard of, and under less scrutiny than Huawei. I think the risk from the things not even enumerated exceed the risk from Huawei. Huawei has much higher value to be made 'proof' that China can make a dominant technology company entirely organically without so much help from western companies (contrast to Lenovo, which purchased western assets from IBM and even 'westernized' their own name, China's government would probably much rather have the organic, unapologetically Chinese Huawei be what people think of when they think Chinese tech company).

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re:No possibility of government coersion? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Recall PRISM. Some of the big trusted brand US brands are tame and ready to not block the US gov collecting it all.
      The US gov and mil trusts the US brands to help collect on everyone.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:No possibility of government coersion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But why would you single out 2 Chinese manufacturers vs every other manufacturer out there? Keep in mind that there are ZERO phones made entirely in a jurisdiction under US control.

      It's almost like they know something you don't.

    6. Re:No possibility of government coersion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are sorely mistaken

      No, I'm not mistaken at all. The DOD has the power to publicly ass rape a western company and its shareholders when they step out of line. You don't know this because you and the media you select don't pay any attention to these issues — there's no climate doom angles or evil "racists" to get outraged at — but the US government routinely crushes people and companies that flout export controls and conduct espionage against the US. Read about inmate and Professor John Reece and the company the DOJ destroyed for exposing sensitive technology to foreign students and violating export controls. ZTE was fined $430 million last year for violating export controls. You might want poke your head up from whatever cesspool of news you get your daily doses of Trump Derangement from and look around at what's going on.

    7. Re:No possibility of government coersion? by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      Go read about the NSA etc modifying Cisco networking gear without the knowledge of Cisco.

      So, the 96% of the worlds population who do not live in the USA should not buy US technology because the US is untrustworthy too.

      So the Answer is, you may as well buy Chinese equipment, because it is no more/less secure than US equipment and you get to save a ton of money in the process.

    8. Re:No possibility of government coersion? by green1 · · Score: 0

      Yes, they know that the chinese brands are refusing to install NSA back doors. So time to put some pressure on them to fall in to line..

      If they actually knew of a case where Huawei was installing back doors, do you really think they wouldn't tell anyone?

    9. Re:No possibility of government coersion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that such risk doesn't even register on the execs outsourcing, as taking measures to audit the work they outsource would undermine the cost savings they are going for.

      So yes, an American company can be totally screwed over if they are the vector used by Chinese entities to attack. However that doesn't seem to effect them in practice in any proactive way.

    10. Re:No possibility of government coersion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Commercial competition. Gotta keep the google/apple gravy train running.

    11. Re:No possibility of government coersion? by green1 · · Score: 1

      You do realize that Huawei phones run Android right? Same as Samsung.

    12. Re:No possibility of government coersion? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      From China's perspective, they have so many channels to inject things into the supply chains through component vendors no one has even heard of, and under less scrutiny than Huawei

      And American manufacturers take samples of finished product and tear them down to ensure they actually have what is in the spec.

      That doesn't mean it's impossible to slip something through, but it can't be a routine "always include the chip with the malware instead of what we told Apple"......at least not without significantly more effort to disguise it.

    13. Re:No possibility of government coersion? by Junta · · Score: 1

      At least some may, but I know that at least some companies do not do that.

      Also, a Chinese company with significant US engineering presence can be in the exact same boat of having skilled US engineers watching for issues, but the presumption is that the executives matter, not the engineers.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  6. How hard is it to notice these things? by Snotnose · · Score: 2

    Lets say I'm a software engineer for some handset company mostly doing low level stuff (drivers/kernels/etc) I'm pretty familiar with the code base but pretty clueless on encryption. If I decided to peruse the code looking for backdoors, how hard would it be? I'm not expecting backdoor.NSA() or anything like that, but would it look to me like a bug I might fix spontaneously (ok, submit bug report, email to whomever asking it be assigned to me, fix problem, wait for it to be assigned to me, take ownership of bug, check in, close bug. But you know what I mean).

    1. Re: How hard is it to notice these things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      the backdoors that matter are in the hardware, not visible to most.

    2. Re:How hard is it to notice these things? by jeff4747 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If I decided to peruse the code looking for backdoors, how hard would it be?

      Almost impossible.

      First, you don't actually have the code. You have, at best, a binary created from the code. That could be run through a disassembler and you could spend many, many hours combing through the output looking for something interesting.....but we're talking about something on the scale of reading a large portion of books in a small library looking for one particular sentence....and that sentence can be phrased many different ways.

      But it's not necessarily in the code on the phone's filesystem and probably isn't. It's far more reliable for the Bad Guys to put their malware into the chips that make up the phone. You're really not going to find something that's embedded in, say, the chip that runs one of the phone's radios. First, you don't have a way to address it from the software running in the main CPU - you only get to communicate over what the phone maker put in, and that is not going to be complete access to the chip. Second, it's not just a binary sitting on a filesystem, it's a binary embedded in the chip. And your only way to access it is to ask the chip nicely. It doesn't have to let you see the binary, and even if it does show you something, you have no way of knowing if that binary is actually what is running in the chip.

      And that's assuming it's still in the firmware and not something baked into the silicon, though that is unlikely. It's hard to do and firmware is plenty good enough.

    3. Re:How hard is it to notice these things? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Lets say I'm a software engineer for some handset company mostly doing low level stuff (drivers/kernels/etc) I'm pretty familiar with the code base but pretty clueless on encryption. If I decided to peruse the code looking for backdoors, how hard would it be? I'm not expecting backdoor.NSA() or anything like that, but would it look to me like a bug I might fix spontaneously (ok, submit bug report, email to whomever asking it be assigned to me, fix problem, wait for it to be assigned to me, take ownership of bug, check in, close bug. But you know what I mean).

      Wrong level - most backdoors will happen at the middleware, framework or application leverl. At best, the low level programmer might notice a permission bit is off on a node or file but that's about it.

      Framework and middleware backdoors can be hard to spot unless you traverse exevery line of code. Moreso for something that spans multiple languages like Android and thus you have to go from Java to JNI to C++ and the code to do so is a bit obtuse because it's the JVM.

      And then the code's all spread through the code tree, so you're digging through massive libraries spread across 10 directories with some really bizarre code paths that jump through many different hoops. (One Android version had 3 different DHCP clients throughout the code, I think it's down to two in the latest releases, but the way they were triggered was somewhat hacky.). With enough creativity, you can make it so very innocent lines of code are spread around that form a powerful backdoor.

    4. Re:How hard is it to notice these things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets say I'm a software engineer for some handset company mostly doing low level stuff (drivers/kernels/etc) I'm pretty familiar with the code base but pretty clueless on encryption. If I decided to peruse the code looking for backdoors, how hard would it be? I'm not expecting backdoor.NSA() or anything like that, but would it look to me like a bug I might fix spontaneously (ok, submit bug report, email to whomever asking it be assigned to me, fix problem, wait for it to be assigned to me, take ownership of bug, check in, close bug. But you know what I mean).

      I'm going to guess 'pretty danged hard'.
      This is based on the fact that there are a lot of patches etc. which keep on being released in code, causing security issues.
      If coders can't find all the issues created accidentally, how hard would it be to find an issue injected when created on purpose?

    5. Re:How hard is it to notice these things? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      A front door is always in place as police support for voice, gps, live mic, file access (up and down) and camera as part of every phone created on one production line.
      Great for watching US mil contractors on a base to see if they are working for another nation.
      Every phone is police ready globally. The only question is who has the keys and is the users phone always set to share with a gov.
      The question for the USA is China watching US contractors doing work on US bases in the same way globally?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  7. Of course they know... by Excelcia · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Of course the US knows that China could order their domestic corporations to put back doors in their products. They know from long experience just how easy it is to slip a back door into products and standards.

    Thing is, if I were a US citizen, I'd far rather have a Huwei product. Actually, as a Canadian I think I still would rather own a Huwei. At least I can probably trust the NSA doesn't have its greasy mitts inside one of those (or, at least, there's a better chance of it). There are daily stories of strange and unusual things happening to people at the border because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Some database has their phone as having been in close proximity to some person of interest to US intelligence and suddenly they are locked in a room with no phones, often no clothes, and definitely no recourse, until they cough up answers that US officials like.

    1. Re:Of course they know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This isn't about normal US citizens, though. This is about soldiers. If the enemy knows your position, they can aim their mortars at you. You might be ok carrying it around in the states, but don't take your Chinese phone with you on a deployment.

    2. Re:Of course they know... by Excelcia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Any soldier, sailor, or airman who takes ANY powered phone on an op should be charged. EMCON considerations are serious, and they will locate you faster from the fact you are making any transmission than they will locate you from hacks in the phone's OS. This is drilled into everyone.

      No, this is far too measured an escalation, this tells me there are untold behind-the-scenes activities being played out here. This is a shot across the bow. A first real action to hit them in the sales department. I suspect US agencies are trying to negotiate behind-the-scenes deals with Huwei to get their own greasy mitts into the guts of phones they sell in North America and are using the prospect of banning their sales outright for "national security" reasons to put the gears on them. If Huwei doesn't give in, they will find the US will escalate claims of Chinese spying and Huwei will lose access to the market.

    3. Re:Of course they know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Like their fitbits? Um ok sure.

    4. Re:Of course they know... by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      At least I can probably trust the NSA doesn't have its greasy mitts inside one of those

      The problem with backdoors is you don't know if the original controller is still in control of it.

      It is quite possible for one group to take over a backdoor installed by another group.

  8. Retail stores? by Kenja · · Score: 1

    I think that may be the core of the issue right there...

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  9. Too late for me by willoughby · · Score: 1

    I just ordered a Huawai phone, an Honor 7x. It's the hottest cheapo phone out there right now.

    I don't work for the DOD or at the Pentagon but still... I'm explaining all of this to my relatives in case I "disappear".

    1. Re:Too late for me by youngone · · Score: 2
      I am replying to your comment from a Five Eyes country over Internet infrastructure that is almost entirely supplied by Huawei.
      There is no way the US would have let that happen if there was anything serious in this. It's probably just another part of the Trade War that is Good, and Easy to Win ©

      Also, that Honor 7x looks like a nice phone for the money. I wonder how good the camera is.

  10. The Chinese are a threat and can't be trusted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good move by the military. Aside from stealing US technology, harvesting organs of political prisoners and killing aind imprisoning opponents, China is a great country. IF you are comparing the US to China at a minimum your are an idiot at most a paid Chinese troll. Don't forget, top Chinese officials have funneled their money and sent their families to live and work in the US.

  11. No government asked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "no government has ever asked us compromise the security or integrity of any of our networks or devices."

    But one government TOLD us...

  12. Meets the highest standards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huawei's statement is laughable in its absurdity. They don't even provide source code for firmware in most cases. If you can't produce RFY-certified devices, then you certainly don't even approach the highest standards.

  13. This is what happens by green1 · · Score: 1, Troll

    When you refuse to put back doors in your hardware for the NSA....

    1. Re:This is what happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they should have a chat with Kaspersky.

    2. Re:This is what happens by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      In the USA? Your brand is asked again and again to support the NSA and domestic collect it all.. The deals get better then the offers just stop.
      Your brand stops been your brand one day and has new owners who have always helped the NSA.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:This is what happens by green1 · · Score: 1

      But if you aren't in the USA, they can't do that. So instead they do a bunch of scare mongering, and start blocking your US sales.

      Of course that just tells the rest of the world that this must be the brand to buy!

  14. Re: they should ban all phones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would prefer if the army fought its wars by phone anyway, we just need Niantic to implement a PvP mode.

  15. Ok gubmint by TimMD909 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Time for the government to put up or shut up with its exact and explicit concerns. If they're sitting on intel that Chinese phone companies aren't acting proper, then shame on my government.

    1. Re:Ok gubmint by clonehappy · · Score: 2

      Jesus fucking Christ, how naive can you be? Are you honestly trying to tell me that you don't already know that every smartphone, fuck, every piece of communications/data equipment in modern existence is compromised six ways to Sunday?

      No one is "sitting on intel", it's a known fucking fact. The military brass obviously have the exact same concerns I would have about using those devices: that the Chinese government is getting all of my information. I wouldn't expect stores on Chinese military bases to sell Apple or any other US-based outfit's phones for the exact same reason, because the US government would be getting all of their information.

      I'm sure you could even make an argument that Motorola (Lenovo) phones shouldn't be sold on base, either. But at least Lenovo isn't literally an arm of the Chinese government like ZTE. Letting any military information, no matter how trivial, pass over these compromised devices is indeed an issue of national security. I suppose you could also argue that by letting the rank and file use ZTE/Huawei phones that they are evading the domestic spy grids, in which case the higher-ups want them back on their own compromised plantation to they can know their every word and thought.

      But at any rate I mean, seriously, grow up into the real fucking world. Would you expect any military to allow its members to use comms that are literally manufactured by their enemy's government? Do you honestly think any device, foreign, domestic, or in between isn't just a minor backdoor away from being a (if not already a direct) conduit to some intelligence agency of some sort? For fuck's sake. It's not a secret anymore.

    2. Re:Ok gubmint by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Depends on scope.

      Should the government ban Chinese vendors from sale to the general public without providing any credible evidence? Hell no.
      Should they ban Chinese vendors from infrastructure projects or ban their devices on military installations, even if no credible evidence exists? Hell yes.

      There are some things that should be done as locally as practical without any justification. National security and infrastructure is right up there.

    3. Re:Ok gubmint by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Jesus fucking Christ, how naive can you be? Are you honestly trying to tell me that you don't already know that every smartphone, fuck, every piece of communications/data equipment in modern existence is compromised six ways to Sunday?

      Someone's tinfoil hat fell off.

  16. Yes, they are trying to.. by thesupraman · · Score: 2

    You have obviously missed the big chains pulling them from the shelves at the request of the government?

    No, not 'banning' them, just the usual quiet in the background secret deals to, you know, ban them.
    https://www.theverge.com/2018/1/30/16950122/verizon-refuses-huawei-phone-att-espionage-cybersecurity-fears
    https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/22/17151186/best-buy-huawei-smartphone-china

    Of course its a bit of a toss up as to the real reason - it is because they wont install the US backdoors, or because the US is protecting Apple? probably safe to assume both.

  17. i want the govt to make a list by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    of known safe phones, you know, the phones only the NSA listens to and collects metadata on

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  18. Re: they should ban all phones... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    Full loot PvP. Let's see who has the expensive phones, now....

  19. So the Chinese are the *OFFICIAL ENEMY* now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you expect any military to allow its members to use comms that are literally manufactured by their enemy's government?

    Since the Chinese have become the official enemy of the US military, when can we expect the Mother of All Wars against the Middle Kingdom, the homeland of those Enemy Chinese?

  20. Like NSA doesn't do this. by gizmo2199 · · Score: 1

    I'd rather be spied on by the Chinese, than an American 3-letter agency. At a minimum, the Chinese can't arrest you, or extradite you to China if you go on vacation.

    --
    This Sig does not Exist.
    1. Re:Like NSA doesn't do this. by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      At a minimum, the Chinese can't arrest you, or extradite you to China if you go on vacation.

      Why not?

      They have the capability to abduct/arrest/assassinate someone anywhere in the world. Just like every other major nation.

      They aren't bragging about using that capability. At this time.

  21. What about Foxconn? by RealityGone · · Score: 0

    Since pretty much every phone (and most other electronics) are manufactured in China I really don't understand the logic here. They make things for Apple, Google, Cisco, Dell, Microsoft, ad nauseum. They ARE the manufacturer so ZTE and Huawei don't even need to ask or know about it at all. I'm sure there are other companies like Foxconn too that make just about everything and slap other brand's labels on them.

  22. "no government has ever asked us compromise" by Wolfier · · Score: 1

    Sure. No government. Just a political party...oh wait they're the same, never mind.

  23. Too little, too late by thunderclees · · Score: 2

    What about the computing and networking infrastructure?
    Can they really be so naive to think that computing and network gear was not the first thing that was bugged?