Slashdot Mirror


Lightning Struck Her Home. Then Her Brain Implant Stopped Working. (nytimes.com)

Can lightning have an impact on people with electrodes implanted in their brains? A new study shares a case study. From a report: Lightning had struck the building. But the appliances were not the only things affected. After about an hour, the woman, who had had the electrodes put in five years before to help with debilitating muscle spasms in her neck, noticed her symptoms coming back. When she went to see her doctors the next day, they found that the pacemaker-like stimulator that powered the electrodes had switched itself off in response to the lightning strike.

In a study describing these events published Tuesday in the Journal of Neurosurgery, her doctors suggest that physicians and medical device companies add lightning strikes to the list of things patients with electrodes implanted in their brains should watch out for. It may sound futuristic, but deep brain stimulation, or D.B.S., has a fairly long history. Surgeons operating on epileptic patients in the 1930s and 1940s found that removing small portions of the brain could quiet seizures. Later, researchers found that stimulating certain brain areas, instead of cutting them out, could quell the involuntary movements characteristic of Parkinson's and other disorders.

68 comments

  1. fuck off with your buzzfeed headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    see subject

    1. Re:fuck off with your buzzfeed headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened next will shock you!

    2. Re:fuck off with your buzzfeed headlines by sabri · · Score: 1

      Came here to comment the same. Glad to see everyone agrees.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
  2. is it happy hour yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    this story isnt about facebook so i dont know why its on slashdot

    1. Re:is it happy hour yet by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Sorry, It slipped though. Sorry for the actual technical content not about social media and personal security.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:is it happy hour yet by drafalski · · Score: 1

      It does have a shitty, click bait headline phrasing though and would fit in on Facebook.

  3. EMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's basically what lightning is.

    1. Re:EMP by ralphsiegler · · Score: 1

      well it's a type of electrostatic discharge that makes EMP along with many other things including antimatter, light, x-rays, acoustic shock wave, etc.

    2. Re:EMP by bobbied · · Score: 1

      That's basically what lightning is.

      They are similar but lighting has very limited geographical location and there are some significant characteristic differences in electrical and magnetic field variations.

      EMP tends to be more about magnetic flux coupling. Lighting tends to be more about electrical fields. Of course, one kind of transient will bring along the other... But what couples best to the energy is totally different. What couples an electric field is kind of different than what couples well to magnetic fields.

      Lighting and EMP are both high energy events that like to destroy equipment, but protection for lighting and for EMP are technically different exercises and require significantly different approaches.

      So EMP isn't all that much "like lighting" though unprotected equipment won't care about the technicalities when it's destroyed by them.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    3. Re:EMP by greylion3 · · Score: 1

      Lightning != lighting.

      --
      Privacy begins with ..
    4. Re:EMP by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      ... but protection for lighting and for EMP are technically different exercises and require significantly different approaches. So EMP isn't all that much "like lighting"...

      You appear to be talking about lightning entering equipment through a conductor. Under that assumption, what you wrote is correct. However, TFA appears to describe an event where the path of the lightning did not include the damaged equipment, so the damage can only be attributed to its EMP.

      And yes, a nearby lightning strike does generate a potent EMP that is an important threat to nearby battery-operated equipment; I've experienced incidents myself, and there's more of that in different threads in this discussion. When I read TFA, my first reaction was: "well duh, something like this was bound to happen some time." Which of course doesn't excuse poor EMP (or, where applicable, surge) protection in safety-critical equipment.

  4. Slow news day? by Higaran · · Score: 4, Informative

    So her home was struck by lightning, and it fried everything, even some highly advance stuff implanted in her body. Do people not realize how much power in in a bolt of lightning? The woman is probably lucky her house didn't burn down, i know that homes have lightning rods and what not, but I've see some massive damage to homes that are struck.

    1. Re:Slow news day? by Merk42 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do people not realize how much power in in a bolt of lightning?

      1.21 gigawatts!?!?!

    2. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is important though. less about the muscle spasms and more pacemakers, especially with americans who have shitty hearts.

    3. Re:Slow news day? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I think the surprising thing about it to some people is that the device was not one that was plugged in, and yet it was still affected.

    4. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worf: Captain, sensors are detecting 400 gigawatts of pure particle energy

      Picard: Ensign, get us out of here, warp 9! ....
      Picard: Captains log, ... We leave behind a being of extraordinary power

      I'm not certain if he should be praised or condemned. Only that he should be left alone. ....

    5. Re:Slow news day? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      It's the EMP given off from the bolt. For example, I've had lightning strike a lightning rod a few houses down from me. The only equipment taken out of mine was my WiFi router. Naturally, the antenna surged from the resultant and fried a chip.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen this kind of damage many times. As DigiShaman stated lightning produces an EMP pulse similar, but of coarse weaker, than a nuclear blast. Anything especially things with wires connected to them can see thousands of volts induced in them for a few microseconds, enough to fry sensitive semiconductors.

    7. Re:Slow news day? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      LOL.. You DO understand that the issue was the voltages involved. IF you give me a wire that touches the right nerves, I can shut down your heart with a AA battery...

      My guess is the medical device has fail safe settings built in, so if it sees any voltages or currents that exceed some pretty narrow limits on it's terminals, it immediately isolates everything and shuts down. They do this as a last resort to keep a malfunctioning device from doing harm to a patient. A nearby lighting strike could easily trigger the fail safe which would be pretty sensitive.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    8. Re:Slow news day? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I was suggesting that it might be surprising to some people on account of the fact that it was not plugged in and you give an example that explicitly requires physical contact.

      I fail to see the relevance of your argument to what I said.

    9. Re:Slow news day? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      I'm saying an implanted device will be working on very low voltages and currents. Thus, it's entirely possible that a lighting strike near by to induce enough of a surge, even in a device not wired to something else, to activate a device's fail safe system.

      You don't have to be directly connected to anything to have issues with lighting surges. If you are very close, induced currents from magnetic or electric fields associated with the huge currents involved in a lighting strike can be pretty large.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    10. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you slept through physics class when they covered electromagnetism.

    11. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was referring to those who are surprised by the story, and implies he was not.

    12. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it's designed so that it doesn't mess with defibrillator usage.

  5. umm.. duh? by the_skywise · · Score: 4, Funny

    Years ago I had a talking Stitch doll (from Lilo and Sititch) that you could "talk" to and it would respond to simple questions. You could turn it on by pressing a leaf switch in his ear or it would listen for voice commands directed to him. Very cool, geeky toy, left it on the shelf and the batteries died and he stopped talking.
    Until one night, had a bad thunderstorm and a lightning strike very close to the house (less than a second between lightning flash and thunder) lights flickered, static on the TV...
    Almost immediately after, Stitch, on the shelf, said "I'm having a pretty good day".
    Cue twilight zone music.

    1. Re:umm.. duh? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

      did you make sure the switch on its back was not set to 'evil' ?

      I'd be worried my friend.

    2. Re:umm.. duh? by the_skywize+(10323) · · Score: 0

      To add to this, I had Stitch running a copy of VxWorks since it was the only thing that would fit on the ASIC in Stitch. I got so randy that night I started to hump my stitch doll. This went on for hours. I was edging and trying to pass out instead of coming. You know, it's way better the next day. But when that bolt of lightning hit, it was totally unexpected, and that triggered a climax within a few hundred microseconds. Stitch's scheduler beat me to it (lean, mean real time sched!) and he came too. So when he said I'm having a pretty good day, HE MEANT IT!

    3. Re:umm.. duh? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Heh. We had some kind of kid's toy duck that would quack. I forget exactly what triggered it, but it only made noise when either squeezed or moved or some kind of interaction. About 3 a.m. one night it gave a random quack from the bathroom, even though hit hadn't been touched in days. After it did it a couple of times over the span of a week, I think we got rid of it, just because we didn't want to keep being woken up.

    4. Re:umm.. duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. We had some kind of kid's toy duck that would quack. I forget exactly what triggered it, but it only made noise when either squeezed or moved or some kind of interaction. About 3 a.m. one night it gave a random quack from the bathroom, even though hit hadn't been touched in days. After it did it a couple of times over the span of a week, I think we got rid of it, just because we didn't want to keep being woken up.

      We installed a cheap wireless doorbell system from amazon to complement our apartment's broken magic-eye bell. About a year ago the front door batteries died and after some weeks of downtime the system's return from hiatus messed with the stability in one of the indoor pickups causing the occasional random rings when nobody was playing pranks at the door.

      Found that false positives are common with wireless bells but not before some fruitless walks around our huge building looking for other potential neighbors who might display a similar doorbell as a source of unwitting interference. The systems brag about a 200 meter reach so it could be anyone in my large 6 story apt complex.

      It's just annoying when you know that weird wireless signals, or temperature changes or gremlins can ultimately trigger confusion if your visitors are unaware of the false alarm likelihood... and can cause annoyance if the problem happens at 5 in the morning. Unplugging everything for a few weeks again brought things back to normal.

      Automation is hard. Paper towel dispensers love pushing that extra rectangle at odd times when there's nobody near the office bathroom sink, and smart street lamps sometimes power DOWN when they feel you are walking under them.

  6. As opposed to.... by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    her doctors suggest that physicians and medical device companies add lightning strikes to the list of things patients with electrodes implanted in their brains should watch out for

    Have physicians and medical device companies been recommending people in general seek out lightning strikes?

    1. Re:As opposed to.... by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      Not in general, but some of "those" patients got that exact advice

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    2. Re:As opposed to.... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Only since the late 1800's.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:As opposed to.... by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Have physicians and medical device companies been recommending people in general seek out lightning strikes?

      That would be a rather shocking revelation.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:As opposed to.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      her doctors suggest that physicians and medical device companies add lightning strikes to the list of things patients with electrodes implanted in their brains should watch out for

      Have physicians and medical device companies been recommending people in general seek out lightning strikes?

      No, but they haven't been saying they should avoid them. Then again, they haven't been saying they should avoid standing on train tracks in front of a moving train, so...

    5. Re:As opposed to.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Positively shocking.

    6. Re: As opposed to.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL doctors are so funny sometimes.

      Better watch out for that stuff that travels at the speed of light! It's like telling gunshot victims to try to dodge the bullets next time. Or telling people with allergies to avoid the outdoors.

      Completely useless advice, but technically correct. Just totally impractical.

    7. Re:As opposed to.... by tomhath · · Score: 1

      And what exactly is a person supposed to do when they're watching out during a thunderstorm? Hide behind the toilet with the dog?

    8. Re:As opposed to.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you need to be outside, looking up. That's how you spot the incoming lightning so that you can dodge it. If you wait until the bolt has entered the room (or worse, the small space behind the toilet) to perceive it, you'll almost certainly fail to dodge in time.

    9. Re:As opposed to.... by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Or be aware that a nearby lightning strike can fry their implant, and if they feel ANYTHING remotely similar to their old symptoms during or after a thunderstorm to seek medical help immediately instead of writing it off as nerves, being tired or whatever.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    10. Re:As opposed to.... by bigtiny · · Score: 1

      so heart patients with pacemakers should 'look out' for lightening strikes. What the hell does THAT mean??? Does somebody carry a cheap 'predictive lightening strike detector' that I haven't heard about?!?!

    11. Re: As opposed to.... by kenh · · Score: 1

      Even without a brain implant I make every effort to be nowhere near any lightning strikes.

      --
      Ken
    12. Re:As opposed to.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that would be helpful advice. Legally it is best to tell people the minimum: Avoid getting hit by lightning. Or you might be accepting responsibility for an implant that admittedly can't survive a lightning strike.

    13. Re:As opposed to.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, in 1808 or 1809?
      Why, why is it so hard to write "century", are you trying to save a few bytes despite wasting megabytes of pictures and javascript and kilojoules of servers and MHz of spectrum?

    14. Re:As opposed to.... by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      A medical device company spokesperson was heard to say he's thunderstruck at such an unmitigated misrepresentation.

  7. Security and Robustness aren't high priorities by FeelGood314 · · Score: 2

    A lot of these devices don't seem finished when you compare them to general consumer devices. I might forgive no security but often they handle error conditions incorrectly and don't even give an indication of a problem. For example radiation counters that say no radiation when their sensor becomes saturated. Or devices that will after a power interruption join the first network that they find and just wait for commands (802.15.4 medical monitors joining ZigBee meter networks). I've also seen devices that as far as I can tell where never tested in the real world before being used (pager based patient room transfer systems - besides no security and broadcasting your private information, pager uses a detect n and correct m error correcting algorithm where n=m, so if the bit error exceeds n then you get the wrong message with no indication)

    1. Re:Security and Robustness aren't high priorities by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  8. What if she were hit by the Pentagon's Ray Gun? by ClarkMills · · Score: 1

    EMPs?
    Microwaves (as used in The Pentagons latest iteration of their recently revealed ray gun)?

    Same question applies for pacemakers and no doubt more things as technology advances, we age and augment (Cybermen anyone?)

    1. Re:What if she were hit by the Pentagon's Ray Gun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What if she were hit by the Pentagon's Ray Gun?

      That depends on the mass of the ray gun and its velocity when it hit her, it would probably leave a bruise.

  9. Why stop there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    her doctors suggest that physicians and medical device companies add lightning strikes to the list of things patients with electrodes implanted in their brains should watch out for.

    I would add that device designers should also take into account bullets, barbed-wired-wrapped baseball bats, axes, knives, phasers, and grizzly bear teeth.

  10. Mobile phone vs. lightning by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    I think the surprising thing about it to some people is that the device was not one that was plugged in, and yet it was still affected.

    This should not be a surprise. Hospitals worry a lot about the EM radiation from mobile phones affecting their delicate medical instruments. I think most people would be aware that the EM emission from lightning is going to be a bit more powerful than your typical mobile!

  11. Maybe she should have just used cannabis instead.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then she could enjoy lightning.

  12. What about heart pacemakers? by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    Are they somehow protected form EMP from nearby lightening strikes? Turning of the pacemaker might not be too bad for the patient, though I don't know, but making it create other kinds of heart beat problems could be fatal.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  13. Hey Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a particular reason we're abandoning headline conventions in favor of clickbait bullshit, or did you just feel like shitting on human culture today?

  14. oh yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > doctors suggest that physicians and medical device companies add lightning strikes to the list of things patients with electrodes implanted in their brains should watch out for.

    ok, I'm watching! I'll be sure to duck as soon as I see a lightning bolt

  15. Lightning Struck Her Home. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then her brain implant stopped working. Then she voted democrat.

  16. Clickbaity headline is clickbaity. by Chelloveck · · Score: 2

    Lightning Struck Her Home. Then Her Brain Implant Stopped Working.

    You'll be amazed at what happened next!

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  17. Seriously? by kenh · · Score: 1

    doctors suggest that physicians and medical device companies add lightning strikes to the list of things patients with electrodes implanted in their brains should watch out for.

    Shouldn't everyone "watch out for lightning strikes?

    --
    Ken
  18. yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. Years ago lightning hit a tree in our backyard. It blew out chips on network cards, a printer and tore up Sue's iMac. Oddly, it also blew out chips and even melted a port on a C.Crane radio I had on a wooden shelf, Totally divorced from anything. Batteries were fine but the radio was destroyed. I was working in the same room and my hair stood on end and my jaw locked up for minutes.

  19. Even without internal electronics you are at risk by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    Lightning is powerful. Even if you don't have electronics in your brain, or elsewhere in your body, you're still at risk of significant damage. I was struck by the stray side bolts of lightning. It shut me down and caused all my muscles to contract. My daughter and wife who saw it happened said that lightning bolts were shooting out of my hands. I have no memory of that. I remember my fists hitting my chest hard as my biceps contracted and my legs flexing so I tipped over. Other than that it was all whiteout for me. I was lucky. No lasting damage. I have a friend who has serious damage to his back, shoulder, arm and hand from when he got struck. He was outdoors. I was in the house. Being indoors doesn't protect you from lightning.

  20. Re:Even without internal electronics you are at ri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you find an urge to build death stars after?

  21. how exactly do you prevent a lightning strike? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "her doctors suggest that physicians and medical device companies add lightning strikes to the list of things patients with electrodes implanted in their brains should watch out for."

  22. Security feature by greylion3 · · Score: 1

    If you're the producer of an implant, would you rather want said implant, which manages some of a patient's muscles, when affected by nearby lightning strikes or defibrillator, to
    A) malfunction
    or
    B) shut down

    A could be potentially cause accidents, and in turn, lawsuits.
    B might an annoyance to a patient, when they have to go have it reactivated.

    I think they made a wise choice.

    --
    Privacy begins with ..
  23. headline by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Lightning Struck Her Home. Then Her Brain Implant Stopped Working.

    Next up: Improve your headlines with this one trick!

  24. Can We Get This Brain Implant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Big Giant Orange Head? There's plenty of unused room inside for it...