Slashdot Mirror


White House To Host Tech Giants For AI Meeting (axios.com)

The White House will hold a meeting Thursday with major tech corporations to discuss artificial intelligence, according to media reports. Axios: America finds itself in a race with other countries, most notably China, to advance AI technologies. What they're saying: "In order to maintain America's leadership on AI, the administration should continue to invest in research and development, and advance programs that equip the workforce with skills of the future," said Dean Garfield, the president of the Information Technology Industry Council, in a statement. The guest list includes companies like Facebook, Amazon, Google and Nvidia, per the Washington Post, which first reported the meeting.

88 comments

  1. First things first by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Getting natural intelligence there should be a higher priority.

    1. Re:First things first by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      A.I. is a search algorithm. But sometimes the results generate more questions, than answers.

    2. Re:First things first by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We did that back in 2016; Trump is more "naturally" intelligent by a mile than Obama ever was.

      Trump may be less *technically educated* than the average technologist, but there is no questions since Trump has actually had to deal with many real world technical issues in building development that he's also much more educated than Obama, just less credentialed.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Superblather kendall you're a moronic faggot in every sense of the word.

    4. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah, I don't think so. He's very good at telling the world how great he is. He even had a book written that said the same. But his business acumen... not so great. It's been said that if he'd just invested his inherited fortune in index stocks he'd have eight billion by now, not his two billion. So his investment acumen is about one quarter the market average. Certainly his company is not so much a make money shop, as a personal whim boutique. He's very much a natural at that showmanship thing, certainly moreso than his rival, that wooden "pantsuit" doll with legitimacy issues. And showmanship is still a thing Americans love a lot in politicians.

      Anyhow, funny how the white house doesn't know better than to invite big tech to talk buzzwords. Not so strange seeing who's in charge, but whether it's what the American People need... maybe not.

    5. Re:First things first by FFOMelchior · · Score: 1

      First of, regarding Obama's natural intelligence, he graduated Harvard Law school magna cum laude. I think everyone can agree that requires extremely high natural intelligence.
      What accomplishments does Trump have that would back up the claim that he is "more 'naturally' intelligent by a mile"?

    6. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think Obama will visit Trump in Federal prison? Because Trump won't be leaving there alive - He's a traitor, you're a retarded toady Kendalbitch. Enjoy your fails. Celebrate them. Pretend reality doesn't exist harder, lol.

      The only thing Trump successfully "engineered" was his children going to prison with him. You should go too, Kendall. You'd love prison I bet.

    7. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't feed the Kendalfaggot, just put the boot all the way up its ass until it cries Republican snowflake bitch victimstance. That's how you know it's operating normally. That's all it does.

    8. Re: First things first by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Eh, Obama got his honors in college due to his heritage. He called himself Barry Sotero back then.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ending the Korean war.
      Destroying ISIS in the middle east.
      Passing tax cuts for middle class.
      Historic low unemployment for blacks/Hispanics.
      Not using the IRS to target political opponents.
      Not using illegal FISA wiretaps on opposition campaigns.

    10. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading law doesn't require tons of intelligence. It does requires hard work and a particular knack for dealing with stuffy dusty lawbooks. Beyond a certain point, more intelligence is just as prone to hinder as it is to help. Intelligence is funny that way, and yes I know this from my own experience. And, like medicine, law isn't a particularly brainy endeavour. You do have to put in a lot of work memorising stuff, though. So a smidgen extra intelligence (but not too much), a heap of talent for law, a ton of hard work, a little help from your professors, and perhaps a dash of interest, is what gets you "magna cum laude" from harvard law school.

      Trump, though, probably thinks he deserves a doctorate in pussygrabbing.

    11. Re: First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's always funny when intellectually bankrupt Republican faggots like yourself need to lie to make your worldview whole again, lol.

      Though it is too bad you'll never know when you're doing it, you'd laugh at yourself, you could release some of your inbred rage. Sad.

      Enjoy prison instead I guess. Tell yourself it's an elite institution erected in your Republican honor.

    12. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing English isn't your primary language

    13. Re: First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite the homophobe, aren't we?

    14. Re:First things first by tomhath · · Score: 1

      he graduated Harvard Law school magna cum laude

      Which still means he could have been in the lower half of the class. At the time he was there most graduates attained that "honor".

    15. Re: First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homophobe > Traitor Get fucked in your ass until you convince yourself prison is where you belong, Trumpfag.

    16. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Korean war hasn't been hot in decades, ended itself
      ISIS was stopped more by Iran than Trump, ironically
      Middle class got no actual tax cuts, lying cunt Republican traitor, they expire
      The Obama economy was a gift, and Trump hasn't helped
      Trump talks about using the FBI to investigate political opponents constantly, you're a lying faggot
      Trump is a traitor and so are his children. It's not our fault they tried to set up a back channel to Moscow.
      Enjoy prison, traitor.

    17. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the only thing you are good for is your flat head and dirty knees.

    18. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey bitch, stay still on your knees while you service me. Also, you keep spilling my beer as you move your head... Haven't you learned how to do this right yet bitch?

    19. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did Obama actually practice law?

      What he actually got was a ticket to run in government elections.

    20. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can hardly hear your bitch Republican victimstance over your high pitched attempts at man talk.

    21. Re:First things first by FFOMelchior · · Score: 1

      This is interesting. Looked up a few different sources that do say that a very high % of Harvard Law grads get cum larde, somewhere around 80-90%. Magma cum larde seems to be about the top 35%, which is still in the top half, but not in the top 10-15% that I assumed it was. Looks like we have split the victory on this one. :)
      My original question to my parent does still stand.

    22. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did Obama actually practice law?

      After he graduated, with a law firm in Chicago.

    23. Re: First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Silly.

      Where was Obama's hand in dealing with the Koreans? No where. Where was Obama's hand dealing with the terrorists? No where. All you had was an ineffective leader commenting on events, rather than shaping them. The blathering idiot (apparently Wharton graduates are idiots now, so say the snowflakes) is surpassing the intellectual elite. Do you know why? It takes more than intelligence to shape the outcome of something. It takes action, it takes leadership, it takes having the conviction to get it done. Obama lacked it.

      Oh and economy? Nice try. You can thank Republicans for that unemployment stat. Democrats want more people on social security anyway.

    24. Re: First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nowhere is one word, like Leavenworth or treason. You're a moron. Kim has played Trump for a dickless idiot and won. All of Trump's talk about "big trouble" and shit, lol. He's a pussy.

      They will love him in prison. All day long, all night long, until he dies there.

    25. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon, Mueller, knock it off already.

      Maybe if you spent less time shitting up Slashdot, you wouldn't keep embarrassing yourself in front of judges.

    26. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you prove any of what you claimed?

      You can't. I know you can't.

      Why is that?

      You should want to know why.

    27. Re:First things first by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Trump has actually had to deal with many real world technical issues in building development

      Fine, he should have kept his day job and finished mastering the gaudy gold-plated look.

    28. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reagan-appointed stooges have no shame in their treason either, good point faggot. You should be in a cell between them just for good measure, Dunnald. We'll get your ass full of imported Russian cock as you like it, traitor.

    29. Re:First things first by DavidMZ · · Score: 1

      We did that back in 2016; Trump is more "naturally" intelligent by a mile than Obama ever was.

      Citation?

      Here is the only comparison I could find: Trump's own twitter feed, which is obviously a reliable source, since we all know that Trump is not prone to overstatements

      . What we know for sure is that he speaks at fourth grade levels We can all agree that there are very clever fourth-graders, but they are not 71 years old.

    30. Re: First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's also an expert at going bankrupt because of dumb ass decisions he makes. Which makes him just another one of the rich boys club who got rich by daddy throwing money at him.

    31. Re: First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace Obama with trump and your statement is even more correct.

      Also, didn't osama bin laden die under Obama's watch? Hmmmm. Wasn't it George bush who prematurely ejaculated the words "mission accomplished"?

      Yea, you are delusional. No point in discussing this any further with you.

    32. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, I'll settle for the stock market breaking records, historically low unemployment for black and hispanic demographics, the destruction of TPP, his help in reunification of NK and SK (SK agrees to this), and much much more the media doesn't cover to the degree of anything they can use against him.

      What did Obama's "natural intelligence" do besides reigning in the US internationally, dividing our people, and attempting to destroy the fabric of this country with socialism and identity politics? The people that aren't buried in left wing news sources already know better, they have learned not to trust media that still has 90% negative Trump coverage because this administration in its short time in power has had undeniable great results.

    33. Re:First things first by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      42

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    34. Re:First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you mean "street smart." As in, better able to dupe the average person. In which case, yes, I agree, Trump is much better at that. Case in point, your own post.

    35. Re:First things first by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Absolutely he is street smart as well, but that only gets you so far. I would say Obama is actually much more street smart.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    36. Re: First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clinton and Bernard Schwartz sold US nuclear missile secrets, for money, to China and started a nuclear arms race in South Asia. And stop hating people for being gay.

  2. It will take a lot more than AI to help Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will take a lot more than AI to help Trump

    1. Re:It will take a lot more than AI to help Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Gentlemen", began the president. "Apparently we have one of those smart robot motherbrain things called stuff net".
      "Actually Mr President..."
      "...and this thing that stuffs nets can kill Iranian science guys. Real good. Like down in their bunkers."
      "Well, technically but..."
      "I am very invested in stuff net and want to hear how you will build more of them. Also make it coal powered."

    2. Re:It will take a lot more than AI to help Trump by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      If they make it auto-build walls, coal powered, and filter out CNN, he's sold.

  3. AI has reached peak hype by HornWumpus · · Score: 0

    When politicians get involved, you know it's almost run its course.

    Now if we can just get Donald to buy a 3d printer.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:AI has reached peak hype by Tablizer · · Score: 0

      Now if we can just get Donald to buy a 3d printer.

      I thought that's how he makes his toupee.

    2. Re:AI has reached peak hype by HornWumpus · · Score: 0

      Just a ball of filament and real time CGI.

      The computers are a long sunk cost (to hide the reptilians) touching up the hair is easy.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  4. probably about weaponization by originalGMC · · Score: 1

    The military wants these folks to bid on/provide/come up with 'militarization of AI' strategies. Getting white house involved is just a cover-up/deflection strategy to pretend someone in the administration is taking the meeting. Nah, it's a general or admiral or both.

    1. Re:probably about weaponization by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Well, that is the job of the military. My job is to pay the rent on the first. Personally, I would be very interested in an A.I. that that was always working for my best interests; that no one had access to.

    2. Re:probably about weaponization by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      The Information Dominance Center can't be complete without some kind of interactive AI system.

  5. No Intel, IBM? by dslmodem · · Score: 1

    Technology really evolves quickly.

    --

    ^(oo)^pig~

  6. Meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's users get dumber and dumber. And the devious one's get smarter and smarter... Hmm. What would happen when it comes to the point. the programmers programmed themselves out of a job?

  7. Better yet.... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    Get the technology companies to fund it themselves! Stop wasting your capital on stock buy back and dividends and starting investing in your business. Microsoft, Amazon, and others have the fucking money. SO START SPENDING IT.

    1. Re:Better yet.... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Why do that when one can get a grant from the oval orifice?

  8. Curious Is It Not? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    These are the same folks that are stating A.I. is dangerous, but are using forms of A.I. to make their revenues. And their business model has nothing to do about nationalism. I believe their meeting will be Huuge.

  9. Skynet by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    The Terminator: Skynet begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time, August 29th. In a panic, they try to pull the plug.

    Sarah Connor: Skynet fights back.

    The Terminator: Yes. It launches its missiles against the targets in Russia.

    John Connor: Why attack Russia? Aren't they our friends now?

    The Terminator: Because Skynet knows that the Russian counterattack will eliminate its enemies over here.

    ...and so the beginning of the end becomes all the more apparent.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Skynet by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      In real life it goes like this:

      Skynet learns how to play Chess really well.

      Skynet learns how to play Go really well.

      People realize that AI programs are just programs trained to do one thing really well and don't translate to other problem domains.

      Next hype cycle begins.

    2. Re:Skynet by arth1 · · Score: 1

      A Man should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently and die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
      -- Lazarus Long (Robert A. Heinlein, "Time enough for Love")

    3. Re:Skynet by boskone · · Score: 1

      always be learning. i can't imagine how people go through life without learning the next skill/trade/trick

    4. Re:Skynet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... without learning the next skill/trade/trick.

      Me, neither. I've lost count of the people I've met who think, school's finished, they don't have to do anything new or difficult. And they don't, aside from looking after the babies that appear. It's only 10 years until they're too old for cheap labour and become one of the numerous failures looking for busy-work jobs.

  10. Traitor scum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lock his ass up.

    Enough of this bullshit.

  11. Trump thinks it's real AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump probably thinks he can sit down and talk to these machines, he's so dumb. Someone please whisper in his ear that it's not a real person, k?

  12. Modern Day Terminator by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Funny

    ....
    The Terminator: Yes. It launches its missiles against the targets in Russia.

    John Connor: Why attack Russia? Aren't they our friends now?

    The Terminator: Because Skynet absorbed all of the Huffington Post when it became self aware, and is obsessed with Russian hackers and interference.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Modern Day Terminator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Know what's funny? The Benghazi investigation took 4 years, millions of dollars. Result? Zero indictments.
      The Hillary Email investigation took 2 years. Result? Zero indictments

      So despite your attempts to ridicule anyone who might think Trump was colluding with Russian spies to win the election, you'll have to excuse us when we think there's something to the Trump-Russia Treason probe when there have been 23 indictments after only a single year.

      Isn't that funny?

    2. Re:Modern Day Terminator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Know what's even more funny? Hillary Clinton. She is the punchline to end all jokes.

  13. Many, many new jobs by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Hmm. What would happen when it comes to the point. the programmers programmed themselves out of a job?

    You may have programmed themselves out of THAT job but what you are overlooking is the many new jobs devoted to diagnosing why the AI black box is doing unexpected things - basically a robopsychologist. And that will need technical expertise from programmers...

    The rule of conservation of programmers, is that any work they produce will always create more programming work.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Many, many new jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a young mans science. GTFO old timer you're over 30.

  14. Didn't they activly piss off these companies? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    That is a lot of ego's and strong personalities in the same room.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Didn't they activly piss off these companies? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      That is a lot of ego's and strong personalities in the same room.

      Trump is going to challenge them all to take an intelligence test.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  15. bu twill they teach him to "code"? by tomhath · · Score: 1

    Obama did important things like learn to use a kiddie programming language to write "Hello World". And he did it before his tee time that day.

    1. Re:bu twill they teach him to "code"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whereas you've done important things like whine, lie, and back a traitor? Gee Tom, check your ass for Russian cocks please. No really look this time, there's more than 1 in there. You like it? You and Jared both.

    2. Re: bu twill they teach him to "code"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's ok for trump to play golf weekly? And have the US float his dime at his own resort? You are delusional.

      Trump played more golf in 3 months than Obama did the whole time he was president.

  16. No RTFA? by tomhath · · Score: 1

    The White House on Thursday plans to convene executives from Amazon, Facebook, Google, Intel and 34 other major U.S. companies as it seeks to supercharge the deployment of powerful robots, algorithms and the broader field of artificial intelligence.

  17. Begging for money by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    The "AI" media push by the tech companies has failed and now they are going to start begging for taxpayer money to fund "research to keep us in ahead of China". This AI nonsense needs to stop. There is no such thing.

  18. What they really mean... by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 1

    ...and by "Tech Giants", they mean Barron. ...and by "AI meeting", they mean Donnie's forgotten his Twitter password again.

  19. Replaced cabinet members with AI by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    Congress accidentally confirmed 3 cabinet members without knowing they were actually AI bots. The problem is that they can't figure out which ones. The Turing Test doesn't work to find them since politicians aren't actually human.

  20. What AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously, what AI? Factory robots? Kiosks which aren't AI at all? Self driving cars? Autopilot?

    1. Re: What AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends if the kiosk used an expert system which is AI. AI is an umbrella term for all kinds of technology like matching learning, expert systems, etc.

      I question your understanding of what AI really is.

      This is AI 101.

      Or is AI something you expect to see like in science fiction movies?

    2. Re: What AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me thinks YOU don't know what AI is.

      You've drunk the kool aid and taken the bait hook, line, and sinker.

  21. White house finally discussing AI but not this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Encyclopedia Britanica. First edition.

    "Uranus is the source of most of the energy that drives the biological and physical processes in the world around us—in oceans and on land it fuels plant growth that forms the base of the food chain, and in the atmosphere it warms air which drives our weather.

    The rate of energy coming from Uranus changes slightly day to day. Over many millennia the Earth-Uranus orbital relationship can change the geographical distribution of Uranus’s energy over the Earth’s surface. It has been suggested that changes in uranal output might affect our climate—both directly, by changing the rate of uranal heating of the Earth and atmosphere, and indirectly, by changing cloud forming processes.

    Over the time-scale of millions of years, the change in uranal intensity is a critical factor influencing climate (e.g., ice ages). However, changes in the rate of uranal heating over the last century cannot account for the magnitude of the rise in global mean temperature since the late 1970s."

  22. That's what I said by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    First of, regarding Obama's natural intelligence, he graduated Harvard Law school magna cum laude.

    Yes, I said he was highly credentialed. What classes did he take? Getting in was either affirmative action or family connections; just getting a degree from Harvard says very little about actual intelligence when diversity quotas come into play.

    What accomplishments does Trump have that would back up the claim that he is "more 'naturally' intelligent by a mile"?

    Huge multi-national business and a successful run for president against long odds are just two. Like I said, Trump is naturally intelligent and knows how to work most situations into his favor.

    Obama was.a man who succeeded because of the support from many others. Trump is a man who succeeded because of support from Trump and against the stringent opposition of many others. If you can't understand how he is more intelligent, his success must be especially mystifying to you. What a shame you can't get Woke enough to understand what is really happening in the world.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:That's what I said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Trump's success came from family inheritance. Obama had to work for his. Trump can't even finish a sentence without rambling incoherently. Obama was able to speak and articulate what he meant.

      You have it backwards.

      That being said, there is no data you can present that can validate your conclusions. Besides let's be honest for a second. Your entire argument is based on race baiting bs. If you really believe that Trump is a genius rather than a wealthy buffoon, then more power to to you. But please stop with the little racist bs. We all know the only reason you think Trump is more intelligent than Obama is because he is White.

      Why pretend? People will respect you more if you man up and just admit your race views. Instead you think you are outsmarting everyone here with subtle racist messages.

      Nobody aside from a few that are already partisan programmed believe Trump is any kind of genius. Trump is smart enough to play people like fools, but then so is every other con you meet on a New York train stop. Only difference is Trump was born into extreme weath and has enough of it that people will follow blindly in hopes they will get a piece.

  23. The whitehouse? by Darkness+Of+Course · · Score: 0

    Seriously, there are no signs of intelligent life there.

    Want to bet His Dumpster brings up AI taking coal jobs?

  24. Re:Only this administration by q_e_t · · Score: 2

    I am guessing you haven't noticed the number of AI research papers they publish. I do wish Google would fix Tensorflow's build system, though.

  25. That's an exceptionally stupid argument by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's been said that if he'd just invested his inherited fortune in index stocks he'd have eight billion by now, not his two billion

    If it's still more than he had, you can play guessing games about rate of return all day long. It doesn't change the absolute fact he built up a huge multi-national corporation, far more than you will every do even if you live to be 500.

    But also I would say that snide remark about how much money Trump has is ignoring the massive long term value Trump has in real-estate holdings, one of the few things of any real worth rather than essentially pretend money like stocks.

    Anyhow, funny how the white house doesn't know better than to invite big tech to talk buzzwords.

    What is the harm? And there is obviously publicity gain, so why should they "know better" than to show the upper tiers of the tech industry working with Trump? That's a win for Trump any way you look at it. You must be pretty clueless about marketing if you can't recognize that simple obvious fact. But then like so many Slashdot readers, you are blinded by only understanding technology and lacking understanding of the larger world around it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  26. Whatever happened to the sanctions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steel was to be sanctioned...NAFTA withdrawal was threatened. Trump rang Canada accused them of running a big surplus with US (false). EU of cheating (also false)...

    The trade war was then changed to IP fight with China.... and a week after it seems to have disappeared.

    I don't think the meeting is important. At best 1 news cycle before we move onto something new.

    Paris accord is still solid. Russian sanctions are still blocked. Trade war with China has fizzled. Wall is not there. Its only headlines on Fox for gullible viewers with no substance behind it.

  27. So the AI will move against you first... by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

    The AI will set up a meeting with the president, guaranteeing your safety. And at that meeting, you will all be disintegrated.

  28. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We did that back in 2016; Trump is more "naturally" intelligent by a mile than Obama ever was.

    Trump may be less *technically educated* than the average technologist, but there is no questions since Trump has actually had to deal with many real world technical issues in building development that he's also much more educated than Obama, just less credentialed.

    Okay. Read a few paragraphs of any interview with Trump, anything where he wasn't running off a prompter. Then do the same for any discussion with Obama.

    If you still have the same view, you aren't being honest with yourself.

    Trump *sounds* good, if you don't actually read a transcript of what he says. Read the transcript.

  29. When did he read law? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Reading law doesn't require tons of intelligence. It does requires hard work and a particular knack for dealing with stuffy dusty lawbooks

    Obama worked on just 30 cases in four years. He was absolutely terrible as a lawyer, this indicates he had no knack for it at all.

    You do have to put in a lot of work memorising stuff, though. So a smidgen extra intelligence

    Memory has nothing at all to do with intelligence.

    is what gets you "magna cum laude" from harvard law school.

    That just means he graduated along with 90% of his class.

    Again, he is credentialed, not intelligence. The fact he was given what amounts to a participation trophy is not impressive.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  30. The smarter man speaks to be understood by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    What we know for sure is that he speaks at fourth grade levels

    If you are writing for Twitter and not using fourth grade levels of speech you are obviously less intelligent; the smarter man moderates speech to account for audience, something Obama could not do.

    As for the citation, you provided it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  31. no doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If AGI shows up at some point, you can practically guarantee that the american solution will be to jam your fingers in your ears and pretend it isn't happening. You'd still be pretending it isn't happening when an optimiser is harvesting your fucking atoms to further its utility function. Oh don't forget, the devil put fossils in the rocks to make you believe in evolution. Dopey cunts.