Slashdot Mirror


Young Chinese Are Sick of Working Long Hours (bbc.com)

Young professionals in China are pushing back against employers who expect them to work around the clock, saying no to the decades old "rule of 996" -- working from 9am to 9pm six days a week. From a report: At the forefront are millennials who are often better educated, more aware of their rights and more interested in finding something fulfilling than the previous generation. And as only children (China's one-child policy wasn't eased until 2015), they are also outspoken and pampered. "In my experience young people, especially the post-90s generation, are reluctant to work overtime -- they are more self-centered," says labour rights expert Li Jupeng, one of many who have observed some millennials challenging the 996 concept.

The relative affluence of their parents and grandparents is part of the reason. China's rapid economic transformation has given rise to a sizeable middle class, with almost 70% of the country's urban population making between $9,000 and $34,000 annually in 2012. In 2000, that figure was just 4%. As only children, millennials are receiving a lot of support from their families -- including a financial safety net should their careers not go as planned. Although their options for pushing back are limited, some are no longer willing to put in long hours for a meagre paycheck.

190 comments

  1. Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Amazing how each generation thinks the one that follows it are a bunch of losers for wanting something different than what their parents want.

    Nobody likes being forced to work long hours. China's economy is getting to the point where a lot of Chinese finally have a choice in the matter. That's a good thing.

    1. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Amazing how each generation thinks the one that follows it are a bunch of losers for wanting something different than what their parents want.

      We are not making fun of Millennials for rejecting what their parents wanted. We are making fun of them for embracing what the grandparents and great grandparents were smart enough to improve upon. The dude over there in his homespun going on about the superior sound quality of Edison cylinders is ridiculous.

    2. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds more like hipsters than millennials...

    3. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it is a good thing but having a choice and taking it doesn't mean that they're not being whiners too. I know my father worked a heck of a lot harder for less than what I do at my age. If I went to my dad and cried about how hard my job is versus the pay I get I'd feel like a loser. So let's stop acting like putting in the hours and the effort isn't something past generations don't understand.

      Millennials have life good but their feelings of gratitude haven't matured yet. It will and when it does they'll look back and understand.

    4. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Amazing how each generation thinks the one that follows it are a bunch of losers for wanting something different than what their parents want.

      Nobody likes being forced to work long hours. China's economy is getting to the point where a lot of Chinese finally have a choice in the matter. That's a good thing.

      Next, with more free time and more self-worth, they'll want democracy, and the right to speak uncensored.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      I sincerely hope you're being sarcastic. A company can't possibly expect to get maximum output out of their employees while working them to death, furthermore, in a civilized society an employee has every right to personal time and a life. In case you are being serious, all way that it's really funny how the explanation for high executive salaries is that they are taking all the risk and making all the important decisions, yet when the company fails it is the WORKER'S fault? Give me a fucking break.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    6. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Ok I'm not sure if it is my Macbook or Firefox but I have one of these faulty macbook keyboards and spellcheck picks wrong words automatically. Sentence should read, "In case you are being serious, I'll say that it's really funny.."

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    7. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the right to speak uncensored.

      Careful, they might say something dangerous like transgendered people have a mental illness.

    8. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh snap! Hard for me to tell the difference sometimes with my old eyes, paid off home, and pension.

    9. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile in America we're censoring left and right. Actually, just right. But it's not the government doing it so it's OK! Because under corporatism the government and megacorps are totally different!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    10. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, your father worked a lot harder for more then you (most likely). When you take into account actual inflation versus pay increase, working people today are able to do significantly less with the money they earn then people 40 year ago.

    11. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I suffered, so future generations must suffer too"

    12. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I'm a millennial with a paid off home. No pension though... those are dead (thanks for that), just a new fangled 401ks that I realize I need a financial professional to help manage to get ROI (you know, kind of what your employer distributed the overhead across your peers to do with your pension).

      I don't see how that has any relevance to the discussion though, other than yet another baby boomer taking pride in dumping the world as an absolute mess to their children to work with and squandering most of what their parents worked hard for future generations to have on themselves. But my young naive eyes have difficulty seeing through all the BS these days. ;)

    13. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Civilized life requires a lot of labor.

      Yes, lots of shitty labor that most people do not want to reasonably do. That's why you pay them more than a minimal living wage.

      Society cannot function if everyone is selfish and does not do things in the interest of the greater good.

      Working overtime and putting your employer first is precisely the opposite of "the greater good". The greater good is for society to work sufficiently to meet the needs of its members. So long as there is a surplus of resources to meet needs, employers can always raise wages and offer short enough hours to sufficiently draw in employees. This is the very core of capitalism.

      And if that isn't close enough to home, consider how much your co-workers depend on you. If you don't expend the effort needed, the company as a whole will not succeed, and for that its clients will suffer as will every co-worker that you are friends with.

      One, if you're not actually doing your job, you should be fired. Two, if a company keeps demanding more work and wants to keep renegotiating the effective verbal contract while trying to guilt trip employees to "[think of your co-workers/friends]", then people should quit and find a better employer.

      If you want to be lazy and selfish and not work hard to live up to the company's needs, then you may find a better home in France.

      So, France is one country that gets it. You work to live. You don't live to work. Unless you just love your job and are willing to put up with shit wages. Obviously, that's antithetical to the original point about requiring a lot of labor.

      PS - Yea, I seriously hope you're joke too. The whole notion that in a capitalist society the bottom/poor should just "[suck it up]" for "the greater good" is bullshit. You want to gripe about actual laziness--where people are told what they're job is, agree to the pay, then fail to do it, then you're right. Just grouping all employer wishes and employee non-compliance into laziness is the same bullshit as all the various ToS that say they can change at any time. In a "civilized [society]" those sorts of contracts are unenforceable for good reason; they're merely one-sided abuse.

    14. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean I can't buy a cheeseburger for a nickel anymore?! Get off my lawn!!!

    15. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Young Chinese
      Exploit SOCKS
      Me put malware
      on your box!

    16. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just right my ass. How many TV shows are you aware of that mercilessly mock Christianity, Islam, etc using religious text, history, etc? How many TV shows involve vivid, explicit sex, abuse, or profanity? Like you say, this is under corporatism, so you can always run your own website and host your own content...unless the police decide it's obscene. You know what's obscene? Real life depicted.

      All things considered, though, the USA doesn't hold a candle to China. House arrest without charges is the norm. There's literally police/informants everywhere in China and there is no place to post your comments without risk of disappearing. Put another way, if this were China, you'd probably be done or in jail by now. If you don't think that's a difference to people merely saying hateful things at you, then you're an idiot. See, more hurtful things.

    17. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

      Only tangetially relevant to parent, but a note of caution to those who deride millenials for being millenials... might want to look up the varying definitions of the term, as it can easily include folks up into their mid 30s. Kind of funny when you turn out to be the very thing you're making fun of, or worse yet, a post-millenial... let me tell you about those post-millenials...

      --
      There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    18. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...each generation thinks the one that follows it are a bunch of losers...

      Yes, but the law of averages dictates that at some point, it must be true.

    19. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be great, then they could be educated with other free speech that transgender is really only a mental illness if they desire surgically change their genitals to the opposite sex, in which case they're actually transsexual.

      Wearing different clothes, taking on roles _traditionally_ oppositely associated with ones sex (nurse, flight attendant, secretary, dancer, etc.), changing ones appearance out of the social norm isn't a mental illness just because it doesn't fit the traditional gender norms of masculine/feminine. It's instead a form if expression and transgender people don't match that role (e.g. "Tom boys" don't have a mental illness but they're basically transgender).

      A desire to add, mutilate, or remove one's genitalia is a different story (a transexual). That is classified as a mental disorder (GID) in DSM-5.

    20. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh were censoring ignorant left extremists too, people who think vaccinations are terrible or promote pseudo science.

      It just so happens there tend to be more extremists on the right than the left these days, or maybe they're just louder I don't know anymore.

    21. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You depend on others to produce the electricity you use, grow the food you eat, make the clothes you wear, and on and on.

      Poe's law not withstanding, we now have enough agricultural and manufacturing technology to work comfortable hours and produce enough basic necessities for everyone on the planet. The problem is that a huge fraction of the world's economic output is frivolous luxury goods for rich people.

      Yes, we need an economic system that provides most people with strong incentives to work an honest 9-5 to produce things like food and shelter. But we need to avoid economic systems that force people to work ridiculous overtime producing luxury watches and designer handbags for the filthy rich parasites at the top.

    22. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want better work, offer better pay. The "greater good" doesn't fill my stomach or pay my bills. The "greater good" doesn't do diddly squat to help me reach my goals. And if working doesn't help one reach their goals, why do it?

      I'm not friends with any coworker. That's how you get snitches or worse: office politics.

      Truth is, if I had the means I'd buy and maintain my own infrastructure so I wouldn't need to depend on others. That's not available to me, so I'm forced to give my labor to a corporation in return for peanuts. I'm not serving any greater good; just lining the pockets of sociopaths who think some people don't deserve a life of their own.

    23. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Oh, it's *always* true. Just because the next generation is a bunch of losers, doesn't mean that your generation was any better...

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    24. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Pensions were immoral - be glad they are gone. Once people realized what was going on and made companies actually pay for the benefits they were promising, they went away... shocking! Now accounting standards are changing for the government and you'll see the same thing happen in the public domain.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    25. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by ranton · · Score: 3, Informative

      a new fangled 401ks that I realize I need a financial professional to help manage to get ROI

      As an FYI, just pick the lowest fee S&P tracking fund you can find. All paid advice just costs you money in fees and doesn't help. It is arguably a little better if you spread it among low fee high cap, mid cap, small cap, and international index funds (I currently have a 50%, 25%, 15%, 10% in one fund from each category).

      Also ignore the advice that you should have 100 minus age percent of your 401k in stocks (and the rest in bonds). That rule is becoming closer to 125 minus age today. For example the three largest target date funds (Fidelity, Vanguard, T Row Price) range between 75%-85% in stocks for 50 year old investors. I personally advocate 100% stock until at least 45 (I don't plan on going below 100% until age 50, unless we happen to be in a downturn then).

      You don't really need much more advice than this to do well with your 401k. Barring a major societal collapse that makes the Great Depression look like a bull market, you will make a great ROI just following index funds.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    26. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by nealric · · Score: 1

      You do not need a financial professional to manage your retirement savings. That is a lie spread by "financial professionals" a.k.a. salespeople. They want it to seem complicated so the rubes will give up and seek help from them for a low-low price of 1% assets under management (which likely works out to 25% of your income in retirement).

      All you need is a low-fee broad-based stock index fund and a low-fee broad-based bond fund. If you are conservative, keep your age in bonds. If you want to get more aggressive make it 80/20. If you want to get a bit more fancy, devote a little bit of the equity side to an international fund. Add to it every paycheck, and don't touch it or otherwise make trades until you need it for retirement spending. That's it.

    27. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just for the record, that is *not* quite what the DSM-V says, and that is not the current position of the mental health profession. In fact, before you can undergo any form of gender reassignment surgery, you need a psychiatric assessment to make sure you are psychiatrically well enough to give consent to the surgery. At least, that's the case of

      Note that I am neither agreeing nor disagreeing with *your* particular views on the matter. You are certainly free to argue that anyone who wants gender reassignment surgery has a mental illness. I'm agnostic on the issue, because the desire to have gender reassignment surgery strikes me as very odd and also is very foreign to my own psychology, and I don't feel that I understand it well enough to judge whether it is healthy or not.

      (Posting as anonymous to preserve mod).

       

    28. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by DMJC · · Score: 1

      Some of us aged under 35 would love to have fully paid off homes, however we have to contend with average house prices of $1 million dollars in Melbourne and an Average wage of $60,000 Australian dollars/year. Assuming you only eat home cooked meals and never go out and actually saved $2000/month from a $4000/month salary. After 10 years you'd have $240,000. after 20 years you'd be halfway there, but you'd also be accruing interest on your loan and be 50 years old. No cash left for kids, any sort of reasonable life or retirement. So please continue to talk down to people living in a completely different economic reality to yourself as if you have any sort of authority at all. BTW I build/deploy Cisco Call Manager for a fortune 50 company as a contractor, so it's not as if I am uneducated, or working an unskilled barista job.

    29. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I need a financial professional to help manage to get ROI

      Unless you're referring to the management that is already baked into the funds in your 401K, no, you don't (and even that management is debatable). Whatever gains you make by having a pro manage it on top of that is going to be eaten up by the fees you pay. Given that a 401K is a long-term investment vehicle, and that you're a millennial and therefore are dealing with a long horizon, you're better off compounding the interest on the money you save in fees. And if your 401K offers index funds, so much the better.

    30. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you just love your job and are willing to put up with shit wages.

      You just described academia in a nutshell.

    31. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing how each generation thinks the one that follows it are a bunch of losers for wanting something different than what their parents want.

      Some generations are worth than others sorry to tell ya. As someone in his 50's watching young people give up their rights and privacy and literally allow companies to steal PC software was a fucking eye opener all the while celebrating their anti intellectualism gamer culture on reddit. Almost wants to make me uninvent the internet, if I knew the average person on our planet was so fucking tech stupid and such a uncaring retard. There will be a giant gaping whole in human videogame culture thanks to stupid ass tech illiterate millenials. A world where PC game software can be "shut down" is a fucking moronic world with grade A corporate ball sucking morons.

    32. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to quote a post then quote a post. Instead you made up bullshit that wasn't said (or even implied) and tried to make it appear as a quote.

      Now the question in my mind is if you did it because you don't have very good reading comprehension or just because you're a bitter asshole.

    33. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was (Baby Boomers)

    34. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      No, you just never thought very hard about it.

      As they were popularly implemented, they were simply not morally defensible. It is a promise made by someone who will be in no position to make good on the promise. The only winners in the pension system were the companies who got away with "I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today" and the union reps who brought home big "wins" for their membership that would not be around to see through.

      If you want to make them morally defensible, you need to basically make them into annuities.

      Don't make promises you can't keep.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    35. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Rakarra · · Score: 0

      Pensions were a horrible horrible idea. They were short-term thinking. What ends up happening is pensions became crushing debt because companies didn't fund them ahead of time, then they would go out of business and all that debt would vanish, leaving the pensioners with nothing. All funds like this should get paid out when the worker works his hours, and it shouldn't be a company fund either.

    36. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Rakarra · · Score: 0

      Worker selfishness is NOT a good thing. [...] Society cannot function if everyone is selfish and does not do things in the interest of the greater good.

      I find this is often the sort of thing said by those who don't want to pay workers what their labor is worth.
      "I have a grand idea/plan, and everyone has to sacrifice a bit to see this plan through."

    37. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Bryansix · · Score: 2

      VTI has lower fees and diversifies better than the S&P.

    38. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While house prices in Melbourne blow in established suburbs, you can get house and land for 300-400k in developing outer suburbs (particularly the north). There's also the west, but who wants to live out there. And the south east, but that's so far out you may as well be in another country.

    39. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Some of us aged under 35 would love to have fully paid off homes, however we have to contend with average house prices of $1 million dollars in Melbourne and an Average wage of $60,000 Australian dollars/year.

      You should have picked your parents better.

      Like Trump did.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    40. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Or a brothel review writer or a quality inspector in a brewery.

      Protip: if you split them part-time it's important to get the sequencing right.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    41. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      To be fair, asian trans-gender people usually look better than not-asian trans-gender people.

      Look at that Kardashian abomination. Face like a bricklayer's elbow.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    42. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by ranton · · Score: 1

      VTI has lower fees and diversifies better than the S&P.

      That kind of detail depends on the funds available in your 401k plan. I would put all of my money into VTI and VTIAX (the international version), but I've never had VTI available in any of my 401k plans. That is why I spread my money between Vanguard's high cap (S&P500), mid cap, and small cap, which becomes very close to simply investing in VTI.

      The current split of VTI is about 75% high cap, 20% mid cap, 5% small cap. Actually after researching it I am going to go down a bit in mid/small cap to match the VTI a little better.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    43. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Momma always said: millennial is as millennial does.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    44. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I'd like to point out that many people in their 50s can write coherently and judge things on the basis of facts. The generation isn't a total loss.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    45. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      They do have a choice, go and buy property in New Zealand, Australia or Vancouver and utterly destroy the housing market for the locals.

      Would you say I'm bitter about this?

      Fuck yes I am, extremely, the governments of those 3 places should be fucking executed for treason for what has gone on to the 50 and under people who aren't in the housing market, we've been robbed due to their greed (allowing it to happen)

    46. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by doom · · Score: 1

      My take is anyone who cares a lot about what someone else's surgical mods has a mental illness.

    47. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, you have options.

      Move somewhere else where it's cheaper to buy a house.

      Problem solved. If demand goes down, so will prices.

      You have options but CHOOSE not to use them.

      Sounds like a personal problem

    48. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by just+another+AC · · Score: 1

      They do have a choice, go and buy property in New Zealand, Australia or Vancouver and utterly destroy the housing market for the locals.

      Would you say I'm bitter about this?

      Fuck yes I am, extremely, the governments of those 3 places should be fucking executed for treason for what has gone on to the 50 and under people who aren't in the housing market, we've been robbed due to their greed (allowing it to happen)

      Wow... so the property market problems in Australia are solely as a result of Chinese investors? Not generous negative gearing concessions that see a flood of money put in as a tax shelter? Not due to artificial restrictions on supply by policy makers scared of upsetting the large baby boomers voting block that don't want development in their inner city neighbourhoods? Not due to inadequate infrastructure spend on connections and development of regional suburbs and smaller cities that has lead to almost half the nation living in just 2 cities? Not due to...

      Oh forget it. Xenophobes won't be convinced the problem is largely the fault of Australian citizens.

    49. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      similar big cap to small cap split here too.
      75% btc, 20% eth, and 5% strak.

    50. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      > Wow... so the property market problems in Australia are solely as a result of Chinese investors?

      No, not entirely actually, but very much exacerbated by them. When they shouldn't be allowed to buy at all.

      > Not generous negative gearing concessions that see a flood of money put in as a tax shelter? Not due to artificial restrictions on supply by policy makers scared of upsetting the large baby boomers voting block that don't want development in their inner city neighbourhoods? Not due to inadequate infrastructure spend on connections and development of regional suburbs and smaller cities that has lead to almost half the nation living in just 2 cities? Not due to...

      All of these, without a doubt, also contribute and also frustrate me significantly.

      > Oh forget it. Xenophobes won't be convinced the problem is largely the fault of Australian citizens.

      Actually it's the fault of the Aussie government, in charge or immigration, foreign ownership laws and of course, the shitty negative gearing laws.

    51. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

      Not acceptable to snowflake, he wants to live in the same sort of house his parents have, in the same suburb as his parents.

    52. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They don't need maximum output. Standing around waiting for customers, performing simple tasks on an assembly line... They just need a warm body.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    53. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why exactly do you think younget to say he shouldn't?

      Because you are the livestock of and siding with your literally psychopathic leech owners?

      Crab mentality much?

      Yeah, I wish good life to EVERBODY.
      Including child rapist hipster millennial baby boomer "voter" military psychopath Wall Street banker mass murderer Judeo-Christian Muslim gay homophobe transvestite black Chinese-Russian Israeli-Palestinensian Mexican straight white male blue-haired lesbian furry soccer mom literally Hiter Putin Cheney Blankfeyn Monsanto you.

      How else will they heal and stop being sick fucks?
      (I have personally met both ex full-on violent Neo-Nazis and ex Muslim terrorists, who had become the nicest people, simply by getting a wife and children, a good job, nice friends, and an all-around good life. AKA NO NEED to do sick shit due to mental suffering.)

    54. Re: Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Further Google cue / rabbit-hole door along these lines: "financial independence blogs"

      My own favorite red-pill article: https://www.mrmoneymustache.com/2012/01/13/the-shockingly-simple-math-behind-early-retirement/
      followed by: https://www.madfientist.com/hierarchy-of-financial-needs/

    55. Re:Cue idiotic millenial jokes in 3,2,1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Careful, they might say something dangerous like transgendered people have a mental illness.

      You can also say the earth is flat, but people will just think you're stupid, just as any scientifically knowledgeable person would think of someone who said that.

      Why do conservatives hate science, logic, and math so much?

  2. They need an union! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Funny

    They need an union!

    1. Re:They need an union! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      There was a time when even if everyone worked flat out 24/7 there still wouldn't be enough food and other basic necessities: lots of people were going to have to go hungry and many people were even going have to starve.

      But now we have enough farming and manufacturing technology that we can produce enough for everyone in the world to have enough basic necessities to live simply but comfortably. And that's just if the working age population is willing to do an honest 40 hour week - no need for overtime.

      So the fact that somewhere around 20,000 children a day die of poverty is about scarcity, per se, it's about distribution. And part of that distribution is geographical - getting food from where it's produced to where it's needed. But most of the distribution problem is between the ordinary people and the rulers. If most of the economy is producing frivolous luxury items for the rulers then there's not going to be enough basic necessities for everyone else.

      In his Gettysburg Address, Abraham Lincoln talked about having a government of, by, and for the (ordinary) people. It's good for people to cooperate, to make collective decisions, and to have leaders. But the leaders (presidents, CEOs, middle managers, team leads, etc,) all need to be constrained to use their power for the benefit of the ordinary people rather than themselves. It's fundamental a problem of enforcing fiduciary responsibility - not using the power you've been granted for your own personal gain.

      Just the other day, there was the discussion around the confirmation of Gina Haspell for CIA director on whether it's OK for the US government to torture people in secret at the personal discretion of a few of its high level leaders. Well, the thing is, ordinary people need as much power as they can get to try to keep their leaders in line - using the power they've been granted for the benefit of the ordinary people. But if the leaders can just torture people in secret at will. Well, that really tips the balance of power far in favor of the leaders.

      As Deng Xiaoping noted, it doesn't matter whether the cat os black or white as long as it catches mice. It's not about communism or capitalism, per se. It's about whether the ordinary people have enough power to force their leaders to use the power they've been granted for the benefit of the ordinary people. Because, when that happens, you end up with a country like Denmark - where poverty is a solved problem and no one has to work overtime out of economic necessity and where it ranks right up at the top in terms of happiness of ordinary people.

      Good luck to the ordinary people of China! I hope they can find a way to keep the rich and powerful people in their country in line - providing a simple comfortable life for everyone without having to work overtime.

    2. Re:They need an union! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they don't, unions are don't do krap any more, in the USA, at one point they did, but not anymore. They can't guarantee anything, IMHO they hinder progress now more than anything. Union Management used to be actual employees that really wanted to help everyone, these days it's usually some corporate asshat that just tries to milk as much money from the situation as possible. If everyone losses their job because the company moves out of the country, he doesn't care because he still has his golden parachute, and is set for a while.

    3. Re:They need an union! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese companies do have unions, although the unions are government affiliated. I worked in Silicon Valley and had never been in a union until I moved to China and started working for a Chinese tech company.

    4. Re:They need an union! by slew · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the "communist party" supposed to be the ultimate union for workers?
      Oh wait, China is walking away from communism as part of it's economic modernization...

      Whoops, I forgot that "communist" actually means "dictatorship" and "communist party" means "ruling-class" in modern usage... Maybe the workers should unite in solidarity...

    5. Re:They need an union! by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      No jackass, investors hinder progress. Corporations are hyper focused on stock price and controlling costs, that they don't invest money back into the company. Innovation suffers and companies tread water.

    6. Re:They need an union! by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Which country are those poor dying in? That might give insight into WHY they are dying. Hint: it's really none of the things you are talking about.

    7. Re:They need an union! by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      Not sure why this is a joke.

      Union participation has a strong correlation with a more equitable distribution between workers and investors (as measured by the Gini coefficient).

      The real irony is that China was founded on a worker's revolt and broad support of the ruling coalition among the lower classes and that over the years -- through corruption and graft -- it's lost any pretense of standing for worker's rights or indeed any rights other than for those in power and with wealth.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    8. Re:They need an union! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Which country are those poor dying in? That might give insight into WHY they are dying. Hint: it's really none of the things you are talking about.

      GP said "But most of the distribution problem is between the ordinary people and the rulers.", which looks reasonably accurate to me. Quite a few governments in crappy countries really don't care if their citizens starve.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    9. Re:They need an union! by aberglas · · Score: 1

      Deng was probably referring to Emperor Moa's Great Leap Forward, during which 30,000,000 starved to death and billions went hungry. Let us hope Emperor Xi is wiser, for he is now just as powerful.

    10. Re:They need an union! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which country are those poor dying in?

      A while back I was wondering how many people in the USA die of poverty. Of course, very few people in the USA die of outright starvation. But what about a homeless person who dies of complications from uncontrolled diabetes because they can't afford insulin? There are almost certainly a lot of people in the USA who would live longer lives with higher quality of life if they had even just a few thousand dollars more per year to spend on basic necessities.

    11. Re:They need an union! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I hope so. However, there have been plenty of other despotisms that would not pass food to the intended recipients.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  3. Fine all work will move to south sudan! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fine all work will move to south sudan!

  4. They should be by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    happy to just have a job.

    That's what the last place I worked told me when I had 14 weeks of unpaid 24/7 on-call.

    1. Re:They should be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one made you work there. You accepted those terms by accepting the job.

    2. Re: They should be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely that was never mentioned and only shoved onto him later when saying no meant not being a team player and job loss.

    3. Re:They should be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one made you work there. You accepted those terms by accepting the job.

      Right! Why would anyone think that a company would take advantage of an employee, let alone break countless laws doing so.

    4. Re: They should be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, no one has to work any job. We should all just quit now because I personally can think of far more rich, enjoyable uses of my life than work. Oh, wait a second, you mean I need money to do those things?

      While I tend to agree with this situation that it's ridiculous to accept those conditions in the first place, that is not always practical in everyone's situation. Declining that employment option assumes other options are available for that individual to meet certain financial and circumstantial requirements in someone's life. When these special needs arise, employers are well aware and leverage them against you when they can in the form of pay cuts or screwy responsibilities.

    5. Re:They should be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't speak for the poster but it sound like he also rejected those terms by rejecting the job. Which is precisely what I would do.

    6. Re: They should be by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      14 weeks. Must be a slow job market.

      At least when they said 'happy to have a job', I assume the GP told them, 'Yep, I do have a job. I start tomorrow.'

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re: They should be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is exactly why companies are able to do it. They know that someone will accept it. The issue is that there's always a someone out there that will. That's call competition and isn't anything different than Company A outpricing Company B for a service.

      If people would all refuse to accept such requirements of a job, companies wouldn't be able to try to make it happen.

  5. way to go. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Hopefully, you will focus on doing your own start-ups, honest ones.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  6. Oh quit complaining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait until your boss makes you "dial it up to 11" and work 184.8 hours in a week before you complain about working too hard.

    1. Re:Oh quit complaining by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      Wait until your boss makes you "dial it up to 11" and work 184.8 hours in a week before you complain about working too hard.

      You know, there is no I in TEAM. There is also no $...

    2. Re:Oh quit complaining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait until your boss makes you "dial it up to 11" and work 184.8 hours in a week before you complain about working too hard.

      You know, there is no I in TEAM. There is also no $...

      As I once replied to a boss who said that to me:

      Yeah, and there's no U, either!

      He didn't know what to say to that.

    3. Re:Oh quit complaining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait until your boss makes you "dial it up to 11" and work 184.8 hours in a week before you complain about working too hard.

      You know, there is no I in TEAM. There is also no $...

      For U there isn't.

    4. Re:Oh quit complaining by Powys · · Score: 2

      There is no I in TEAM but there is an M and an E

    5. Re:Oh quit complaining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is no I in TEAM, but there is a U in CUNT"

      -- Kenny Powers

    6. Re:Oh quit complaining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do understand there aren't 184.8 hours in a week, right?

      A week is only 168 hours long.

    7. Re: Oh quit complaining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of you are here because you think it might make you more pop-u-lar.

      Me and Shane used to ride around, slay ass....

    8. Re: Oh quit complaining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wooosh

      Tell that to China.

  7. Welp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have a point. There's so many Chinese and such a large workforce that they are one of the few nations that can accommodate a system of
    generally halving work hours to substitute them with shifts, and instead encourage workers to get their health and studies regarding the work they do
    constantly in top shape and up-to-date. Not many people continue studying to keep themselves informed on the latest news and innovations in their fields
    after leaving Uni; and a rational work-schedule provided by government and business including an intelligent nudge and system to encourage this is the way.
    A good worker is a worker who is in good shape to think and constantly improve.

  8. Join the fucking club by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Ok, we might not be on 12 hours a day 6 days a week anymore but it still sucks unless you're lucky enough to bag a job you enjoy that doesn't just suck the fun out of it.

    "I'm only working here because I need more fucking money"

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    1. Re:Join the fucking club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a huge fucking world of difference between 996 and your shitty job, you twit.

      Most worthless post I've seen on the internet today.

  9. Definition of capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Definition of capitalism: The art of making money with the work of others.

    For vulture capitalists and other "investors" to make shittons of money sitting on their fat capitalist asses in their ivory towers doing absolutely nothing, somebody, somewhere, has to bust their asses day and night, seven days a week, in some shithole factory or mine, working in disgusting conditions, ruining their health, and getting out of it the bare minimum.

    1. Re: Definition of capitalism by Immerman · · Score: 2

      The rich don't risk starvation if a risk fails. In fact they can generally suffer several back-to-back failures and still afford that globe-trotting vacation they had been eyeing.

      Risk diversification is risk reduction - and only the rich can afford it.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re: Definition of capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The rich can *literally afford* to take risks because they're entirely *financial risks*, not risks that affect necessities like food, housing, medical care, etc. That argument is and always has been garbage. A certain portion of finances directly translate to necessities. Everything over that give you more advantage to take risks because you have more opportunities to fail and inevitably more opportunities to succeed.

      Once you have a certain amount of wealth tucked away to assure you'll eat and won't be miserable your entire life, the rest of your assets can become, essentially, monopoly money. You may win or may lose but you'll still have an enjoyable life. It could be a lot more enjoyable (yachts, supercars, etc.) or medicore (average luxury car, small boat, etc.).

      Your average person can't do that or they may not have a home, they or their kids may go hungry, they may forgo necessary medical care, etc. Risk aversion is not a valid argument unless the playing field starts the same way.

    3. Re: Definition of capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who are you kidding?

      The rich don't risk their own money. The Truly rich use Other People's Money for anything risky.

      Want to scape up a few million for the weekend? Announce your investment group will buy a corporation. Get a bunch of "investors". Throw together a deal. Skim off your percentage of the multi-million dollar pot and walk away. Leave the suckers to run it while you move on to the next deal.

      Risk is for suckers.

    4. Re: Definition of capitalism by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      The rich DO NOT take risks. They prefer safe investments with government backed subsidizes...

    5. Re: Definition of capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice spouting off, but you have no idea of what you are talking about buddy.

      This is not a race to the bottom where everything above having a cup of rice every day is "luxury". Your average person is not homeless and starving and that should not be your measuring stick of "richness" baseline. The average person is employed. They spend their money on a slightly better car, slightly better tv, a nicer house or apartment, better food etc.

      Maybe you think the "rich" are playing with monopoly money because you've always been negative net worth and never saved any money, so you don't know how much harder it is to risk losing all the money you worked for many years. You've never invested a few years' worth of savings in a business to see it fail. Because investments, as opposed to wages, can definitely negate your worth very quickly. Wages can only stop coming, they aren't going to drain your bank accounts.

  10. China has to change by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    China can either become more like the West, or they can be overrun by their own citizens -- or, I suppose, go the al-Assad route and start slaughtering them wholesale for daring to want a different way of life. People don't want to live like this, no matter how much you try to indoctrinate them that it's 'normal' and 'right'.

    1. Re:China has to change by tigersha · · Score: 1

      So was Saddam. And Gadaffi. Little good it did their subjects.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    2. Re:China has to change by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      This isn't about religion and I'm not bringing religion into it, so don't even go there.

    3. Re:China has to change by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Actually people under Saddam, and Assad, and Khadaffy had decent enough lives, as long as they didn't speak out against the government. You know, kind of like what we have in America. Fun fact: did you know that Libya was a socialist government that provided for all its people? That's right! There was no hunger nor no want. The petroleum wealth provided for all. Even more fun fact: Libya was bombed to hide the fact that French Premier Sarzoky was corrupt! Yup, that's true. The more you know.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:China has to change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are missing an alternative: the West is going to become more like China and there won't be anywhere to flee except the shitholes.

    5. Re: China has to change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bro, you have completely jumped the shark. Holy fuck man.

      I stopped reading at "You know, kind of like what we have in America."

      Lately your post have been ramblings, me thinks you are either getting old, or bored. Maybe both.

      Chill out jeff ;)

    6. Re:China has to change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that propaganda juggling working out for you? Does the air of superiority not smell somewhat like a fart when you realize that the moral obligations are merely deceptions to acquire the commodities of other countries and further enrich the taxpayer funded military industrial complex that is ushering in WW3 as we speak? Does it make you feel good, the deaths of millions under the pretense of 9/11 lies as we are funding jihadists going into Syria, the same that we claimed caused 9/11. Do you find thinking so hard that you rely on others to do it for you?

    7. Re:China has to change by ghoul · · Score: 0

      Under Gaddafi Libya had higher Education and Medical scores than most countries in Europe.
      Gaddafi was overthrown because he wanted to create a Gold Dinar as the African common currency and take oil trading off the dollar. Everything else was a smokescreen. The reason Clinton had to hide her emails was she was supporting Al Qaeda in Libya to overthrow Gaddafi.
      If there is justice in the world someday Obama and Hillary will have a Nuremberg of their own.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    8. Re:China has to change by ComputersKai · · Score: 1

      Facetiously speaking, they probably are becoming more like the West, in glorifying long working hours and career above all, et cetera.

      As mentioned above by some users already, Asian culture in part does emphasize this kind of behavior quite a bit. I remember reading something about workers in Japan going to work in spite of adverse symptoms in the aftermath of that terrible subway sarin incident.
      In addition, the Chinese have a fairly strong tolerance for suffering calamities, as their history would seem to illustrate, so it takes a lot for them to consider actual revolt and that stuff, least of all when the older generations, in general-not just in China, are not so inclined to upset the improved societal conditions they have nowadays.

    9. Re:China has to change by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      An expert on countries he couldn't even point to on a map wrote:

      The different way of life wanted by the rebels is Islamist. Assad is secular, remember?

      There's more than one rebel group, and they aren't all Islamists. Not even close.

      Also, why do you assume that the opponent of someone secular automatically religious?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  11. The same thing happened in Japan by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Once you reach a certain income, you ask "why am I trading my life away for this?"

    It's a good sign that the chinese economy is maturing. They still won't achieve wage parity for another 20 years at current rates and that will give them a competitive advantage until then.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  12. You hate me for being different. by Dirk+Becher · · Score: 1

    Spoken like a true millenial.

  13. Self-centered? by JD-1027 · · Score: 2

    "...young people, especially the post-90s generation, are reluctant to work overtime -- they are more self-centered," says labour rights expert Li Jupeng

    Not wanting to work overtime is considered self centered? China will thrive even more with young people that finally understand that life is much more than your job.

    1. Re: Self-centered? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 0

      And now you understand the joke that is communism. It is amusing that communists and marxists in the west forget about the "expected to work themselves to death for he glorious party" bit of communism.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    2. Re: Self-centered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is amusing that communists and marxists in the west forget about the "expected to work themselves to death for he glorious party" bit of communism.

      I don't think that they've forgotten, they just think it will be different this time. This Slashdot comment is relevant:

      https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10486347&cid=54234197

    3. Re: Self-centered? by skam240 · · Score: 1

      For starters, China isn't really communist. They call themselves as such but more of their economy is privately controlled than not. That's not very communist.

      Also, I seem to be a little fuzzy on my Marx here. Which writings of his are you referring to with "expected to work themselves to death for he glorious party"?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    4. Re: Self-centered? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I thought the "sacrifice self for the people" was more of a general asian culture thing

    5. Re:Self-centered? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Might have lost something in translation.

      Chinese people often put family first. Younger people are becoming more independent, thinking more about their own needs and wants.

      Or maybe he is just a capitalist pig-dog who expects people to kill themselves for his bonus. Hard to say...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re: Self-centered? by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      It's Vulcan.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    7. Re: Self-centered? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      I'll bite. Marx's plan was that humans can cooperate for the benefit of everyone. A very game theory idea, and on the surface it seems great as long as assholes don't mess it up. Golden rule is the best rule. And, hey, capitalism is kind of crap when you look at it, lots of wealth imbalance.

      However, "benefit of everyone" is somewhat subjective when it comes down to the details. The only way to get everyone on board is to have a totalitarian state forcing everyone to do exactly what they say. The people in power get to say "see, everyone is working for the benefit of all", the people at the bottom may have different ideas. Not "benefit of everyone" as much as "benefit of everyone we don't kill in our revolution."

      When you look at it that way, well regulated capitalism seems pretty reasonable.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    8. Re: Self-centered? by skam240 · · Score: 1

      See, you did exactly what the other poster did, you took Marx and then put your own spin on it.

      What Marx actually says on this subject is that there will be a mass mind set change as part of the revolution and that what you describe won't be a problem

      Don't get me wrong, I don't think this will ever happen but that is what Marx actually laid out.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  14. Legally this isn't allowed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it's getting more and more enforced these days, although mainly in larger corporations versus small firms. There is of course an exception that allows one to work more than 8 hours a day, but that still requires a person not to work more than 40 hours per week. The exception is for people like train conductors or pilots that may have to work more than 8 hours in a single day.

  15. Silicon Valley? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't this just mentioned in Silicon Valley as the "New China"?

  16. Wrong? by Sejus · · Score: 1

    Are we sure they were not saying they didn't want to work wrong hours?

  17. No this isn't social change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the first effects in China of the trade war with the US. Expect more as the effects really begin to take hold.

  18. Entitled by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0

    Typical entitled millennials too lazy to work like their parents did. No wonder the boomers hate them so much.

    1. Re:Entitled by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      The parents of "typical millennials" worked 40 hours a week.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:Entitled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical entitled millennials too lazy to work like their parents did. No wonder the boomers hate them so much.

      Except most boomers didn't work 12 hour days either.

    3. Re:Entitled by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      I assumed the /s was implied in my original post (that that boomers wouldn't try to convince millennials that they worked that long.)

    4. Re:Entitled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parents of "typical millennials" worked 40 hours a week.

      Their fathers averaged 39 hours a week, their mothers 38. Father retired in late 50's and mother in early 40's (in the stats look for leaving workforce permanently).

      Parents of typical millennials work surprisingly little.

    5. Re:Entitled by Immerman · · Score: 1

      You should know better than that. Implied sarcasm will ALWAYS be misinterpreted online.

      And these days, with wingnuts from all extremes climbing out of the woodwork and expecting to be taken seriously, that's more true than ever.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    6. Re:Entitled by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Do you have a source on this? It's plausible, sure. But I do like having sources.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    7. Re:Entitled by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Even that is misleading because they also existed at a time when the labor sector was transitioning from predominantly male to male+female. That means they basically got paid double on top of it.

  19. Doing what? by evil_aaronm · · Score: 2

    Seriously - wtf is there to do for 12 hours per day 6 days a week? If they were digging in mines, ok, I could see that, though with the physical nature of it, they'd probably be better off getting more rest. Or is just fill-a-seat type "work"?

    1. Re:Doing what? by jetkust · · Score: 1

      Seriously - wtf is there to do for 12 hours per day 6 days a week?

      Solitaire.

    2. Re:Doing what? by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      The shop has to stay open, why would you want to pay 2 people if you didn't have to?
      Why have 2 shifts of widget makers if you can just make the first work longer etc. (of course the reason is productivity, but don't tell them that, they are already stealing all our jobs)

    3. Re:Doing what? by mikael · · Score: 1

      Manufacturing: box packing, component assembly, soldering, inspection, electronics repair. Look at some of the videos of people walking around Shenhzen. You can build your own smartphone simply by walking around shops, collecting the components, then buying a case and getting the touchscreen glued in place.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:Doing what? by fermion · · Score: 1
      I don't know about China, but a I have been in developing countries where the inefficiency is just outrageous, It is mostly because wags are low, people need to work a lot of hours to make a living, and any innovation is frowned upon because it would cost jobs.

      For example, in the US if you had to go a teller to get money at the bank, it is a quick transaction, usually not requiring any paper. However, many other countries still require not only paper, but a complicated ritual that can easily require 10 minutes. These examples are at all levels of the society, requiring people to work long hours in tasks that are increasingly meaningless.

      In the US we see this as jobs become increasing knowledge and skilled base. Many jobs that used to be about pushing papers and standing all day now require a worker that is has significant knowledge and skills. While older workers are used to being treated like replaceable cogs, younger workers, i.e millennials, as well as older highly educated workers, are much less willing to accept negative criticism for not working long hours, standing up, or dressing up.

      There was a time when an industry standard haircut, the right cheap suit, and an acceptable range of skin tone was enough to get a job. Now people want certificates, degrees, even creativity. Something has to give.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:Doing what? by tigersha · · Score: 2

      You have a link to such a video? Would love to see it.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    6. Re:Doing what? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Small parts that are still larger enough for a human to place along the production line.
      That don't need a robot to be set up.
      Products and services that change every few months so a new complex robot is still just too expensive.
      The option to move to an Indonesia, Laos and set up a new factory and get lower costs than in China.
      Buy more new robots and attract more special production lines that pay more per product.
      Just keep on using humans and keep the new parts size human worker ready.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:Doing what? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Seriously - wtf is there to do for 12 hours per day 6 days a week?

      QA / QA on Microsoft products.

    8. Re:Doing what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite as cost effective as you'd imagine, but here you go.

  20. Great for world-wide wages and quality of life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Chinese workers have enough ability to push back, that will be good for employee wages world-wide.

  21. No need for a union by tomhath · · Score: 1

    If you had bothered to read the article you would know that market forces are already solving the problem.

    1. Re:No need for a union by Dorianny · · Score: 1

      Labor is a "market force," Unions give workers bargaining power they wouldn't have as an individual

    2. Re:No need for a union by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's true. But unions are not the only market force. Hence my response to GGP's comment that they "need" a union.

    3. Re:No need for a union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh lol one of those morons who thinks pure economic libertarianism is realistic. The magical free market will correct itself. "Market forces" are "already solving the problem" because someone intentionally made a decision to fix it. It didn't just happen on its own.

    4. Re:No need for a union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we just to wait N years for market forces to solve the problem (N=70, or 27 or whenever you choose to count from). Great.

      By the way, while the precious "market forces" are "solving the problem", do we get to stay at home and rest up? Somehow I have this hunch that wer'e going to continue to be bound to the long working hours until it's "solved".

      Also, how is the market forces solution of the healthcare problem going in the US?

    5. Re:No need for a union by mikael · · Score: 1

      In China's case there are more employers desperately needing workers than there are workers. Workers communicate rapidly using mobile phones about the best and workplace environments. This had led to rising salaries and companies being forced to relocate factories inland to find workers.

      In the West, salaries are high in those areas where there are more employers than workers. The places to avoid are one company towns or those university cities where there are more graduates than jobs.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    6. Re:No need for a union by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      You mean they're moving the company to another slave wage country....

    7. Re:No need for a union by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Adam Smith talked about that. The problem is that the boost in pay is temporary. If the economy settles down and doesn't grow, worker pay goes down. (Smith's example was China, a wealthy country with really poor people, ironically.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  22. Globally good news! by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As long as there is someone willing to trade their life away cheaply the rest of the globe is stuck with those poor conditions. The most clever phrase I ever heard was "We are the 99%". At the end of the day, fairer economics will help people far more than any number of "social issues". You can't get to 99% unless you ditch social issues that fracture it like BLM. That's why social issues get pushed so hard by the media, to keep us from realizing that we've all been conned while we argued over bathrooms and bakers.

    1. Re:Globally good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol why are you always talking about BLM? did your momma run away with a black guy when you were a kid? just interested to know where your grudge against black lives comes from...

    2. Re:Globally good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, the major thing holding back the economy is black people complaining about getting murdered. It's ironic, because really all racial issues would dissolve away if blacks would just stop fucking complaining.

    3. Re:Globally good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol blaming oppression on the oppressed..

    4. Re: Globally good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The American way.

    5. Re:Globally good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because grievance mongering is THE problem in the US. We don't have many actual problems left in America, but we've got whole generations of people inculcated with hate by fake problems, like police "genocide" of blacks. It's daily now to see video of deranged black people living in a world of fictional oppression.

    6. Re:Globally good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the end of the day, fairer economics will help people far more than any number of "social issues".

      I'm not sure that's true; fairer economics isn't happening in a generation, or even two, so I'm just supposed to live the rest of my life with not being provided the same benefits and dignity as everyone else and be ok with that? And once economics are better, those issues will remain. More than one battle can be fought at once, and sometimes an uneasy, temporary truce is needed where goals align.

    7. Re:Globally good news! by Green+Mountain+Bot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can't get to 99% if you ditch that stuff, though. And really, people not wanting to be subject to harsher treatment by the police due to the color of their skin doesn't seem terribly unreasonable to me.

    8. Re:Globally good news! by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      You can't get to 99% if you ditch that stuff, though. And really, people not wanting to be subject to harsher treatment by the police due to the color of their skin doesn't seem terribly unreasonable to me.

      People have limited bandwidth and all problems cannot be tackled simultaneously. Fixing the problem of the 1% taking all economic gains helps 99% of the people. Fixing any other social issue will help less than 99% of the people. To do the most good start with what benefits the most people.

  23. Good luck to them by HeckRuler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    8 hours work, 8 hours recreation, 8 hours rest. My grandfather bled for this so Mr. Project Manager can go fuck himself for his overtime. May they have a better time than we did with our labor-owner relations. The pinkertons, the homestead strike, the Colorado Labor Wars, company script, blacklists, strikebreakers, infiltrators, massacre. Least we forget.

  24. goood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About time Asia started to realize their work ethic and the hours they've been forced to labor aren't really normal.

  25. Who does Mr. Spacely think he is? by quietwalker · · Score: 1

    These three hour workdays are killing me!

    (Pedantic note: The Jetson's have represented George's work hours randomly, from 3 hours above (assumed this is 'overtime'), to 2 hours, 3x a week, to 1 hour, 2x a week)

  26. Wait ... by oshkrozz · · Score: 1

    You mean having few children (one) means your parents can provide a safety net with more income and you can get out of poverty? Something must be wrong with that ...

  27. 996 by backslashdot · · Score: 1

    If it wasnt for 996 the luxury of pushing back against in now wont exist. The Chinese are not starving and the global economy better today and we have nice toys thanks to the fact that they were cheaper than western manufacturing.

    I am not saying they need 996 at the same time they have to respect that it was needed.

    1. Re:996 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Others must suffer for the greater good."

      That view is bullshit. What "greater good"? There is no greater good being sought by corporations. They're only interested in extracting labor from people and resources from governments, so they can sell their bullshit to yet more people, completing the cycle of taking money from the public.

    2. Re:996 by backslashdot · · Score: 1

      If there is nothing to buy whats the point of the public even having money, and how does the public get money without business/commerce?

  28. Silly Schwartz! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both the "1%" and BLM rhetoric were manufactured by the same people for the same reason: to elect Democrats. The 1% line was pushed as a weapon against Mitt Romney. The BLM line was pushed as a way to keep black voters enraged and voting for Democrats, and thus elect Hillary, without Obama at the top of the ballot.

  29. better educated, more aware of their rights by Tailhook · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You know, the "40 hour" week was formalized in the US by uneducated line workers many of whom could barely read. It doesn't take a half a life time of education debt to grasp the concept. These attitudes are emerging in China because the demand for workers is high enough that workers have leverage, not because they have degrees.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    1. Re:better educated, more aware of their rights by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      These attitudes are emerging in China because the demand for workers is high enough that workers have leverage, not because they have degrees.

      Not quite. The thing is you can't compare all countries directly, especially due to the incredible cultural differences between them. Making demands of your employers just because you have buying power? Not in your parents China! That would be considered disrespectful. It would be frowned upon. What kind of a man would not actually *want* to work 12h/6d to provide for their family. Are you not a good family man? Shame on you.

      Education is required to get over that mindset, and not just personal education. You need to educate a generation. Enlightening ones self brings alienation. Enlightening a generation brings about cultural changes.

    2. Re:better educated, more aware of their rights by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      That would be considered disrespectful. It would be frowned upon.

      Workers in the West were subjected to all manner of cultural shaming by the ruling class, the clergy, their elders, law enforcement, effectively everyone. Your ignorance of this history is painfully obvious.

      Education is required to get over that mindset

      So says you. History supports my view. You have educrat talking points.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    3. Re:better educated, more aware of their rights by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Your ignorance of this history is painfully obvious.

      I'm not ignorant of this. By comparing the USA at the dawn of the industrial age to China *you* are. Being disrespectful in the east and in the west has two very different connotations.

      Did any of your elders fall on their own swords in shame? Thought so.

      So says you. History supports my view.

      History supports both our views as we are talking about two different cultures. Your ignorance of this Chinese history is painfully obvious.

    4. Re:better educated, more aware of their rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, the "40 hour" week was formalized in the US by uneducated line workers

      It was not Henry Ford who reduce the week to 40h because it was more productive overall than tiring unecessary the workers ?

      Several studies since have shown that 40h is really the max lenght of work per week before having diminushing return (and on repetitive jobs).

      And because the world productivity is so high actually and with automatization, that we should be all around 25-30h per week.

      Fun fact: hunters gatherers need 15~20h/week[over 7 days] (annual average) for retrievieng food and build shelters.

  30. Where will cheap labor slave ship next make port? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At this rate slave labor is going to become an endangered species. SAD.

    As a fat lazy American I used to have pride knowing other people spent their lives working in shitholes making whatever scraps they could wrestle away from rats just so I could save a few bucks at Nike Town.

    Now everyone wants to assert themselves and be paid fairly for their work. What a bunch of losers.

  31. well said WindBourne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and hopefully, you will focus on your own start-ups, instead of sucking Elon Musk cock.

  32. Asses in seats doesn't equal work anyhow. by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I ran a development team, I soon learned you have to police people who develop the habit of spending long, non-productive hours at work. These people are not the high performers.

    I'm not talking about flow sessions where someone spends twelve or even eighteen hours without realizing the time is passing -- that exploits a natural behavior of brains when they're fully engaged. I'm talking about people frittering away hours dancing around work without doing it. Keeping your ass in the chair longer is a way for a lazy person to convince himself he's a hard worker.

    Nobody can give their best for seventy hours a week, week in and week out. It's a challenge getting peak effort out of people working forty hours a week. Routine long hours are often a sign of lack of management planning and vigilance.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Asses in seats doesn't equal work anyhow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can if you point a gun to their head and give them strict quotas. 90 units an hour or you will be shot!

    2. Re:Asses in seats doesn't equal work anyhow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. Long hours generally tend to work well for light/moderate physical labour or repetitive tasks. Essentially these are jobs where you can turn off your brain and let muscle memory take care of things. Time flies when you are not even there. When performing more cognitive tasks the number of hours you can work continuously goes down drastically with complexity. At the end of the day mental exhaustion sets in, you lose focus and make mistake after mistake.

      Based on hours worked you appear productive but in reality you are just wasting time.

    3. Re:Asses in seats doesn't equal work anyhow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only waste time at work, because being efficient doesn't matter whatsoever. I have to be there 40 hours on light weeks with 20 hours of work to do and I have to do overtime when management fucks up planning. HR only cares how many years I've been sitting in that chair. So, all I need to do at most jobs is get a good review. Working hard isn't the way to a good review. Politics is. Why, if I have to work a 40 hour week minimum regardless of my efficiency, with my pay almost totally determined by my job title and years experience, would I care if I am efficient or not? That's your job, Mr Manager, not mine.

    4. Re:Asses in seats doesn't equal work anyhow. by hey! · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right; it's my job to make you efficient. That's why you'd never, ever have a 40 hour work week with only 20 hours of work if you were my employee. I'd give you at least 10 hours of ax-sharpening assignments. Evaluate this product; figure whether X cold be done or how to do Y better. This kind of assignment not only makes the group more competitive, it's interesting for you.

      I'll tolerate up to maybe 20% of your time frittered away, but there's no way you'd get a positive review from me if you wasted 50% of your time.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:Asses in seats doesn't equal work anyhow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, I am much more efficient than my peers. All I need to do is fool you into thinking I'm not fucking around. You won't know that I'm not working as much, because the rest of your employees are even worse! Competition is exactly what enables this!

    6. Re:Asses in seats doesn't equal work anyhow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you helicopter manage them so much you dictate almost 100% of their time? Sounds like you would eat up more than a quarter of my day with just that bullshit. I know what I need to do and I do it. My bosses rarely bother me and never inquire how much time I spend working or not working, because I actually get done what needs to be done by the time it needs being done. You sound like you could be replaced by a spreadsheet and a chat bot.

    7. Re:Asses in seats doesn't equal work anyhow. by hey! · · Score: 1

      If that's the only alternative you can see to allowing them to spend fully half their time on non-productive tasks, I'd say you've never seen a competent manager.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:Asses in seats doesn't equal work anyhow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to have this fantasy that you can control that which you cannot. If you give a dog a treat for doing something you want, it will love you and obey you (as long as the treat is worth the squeeze). If you beat it when it misbehaves, it will do the bare minimum not to be beat and then piss in your shoes while you're at work. All you can do is incentivize. You sound like a narcissist control freak, and all evidence points to narcissistic bosses being a fucking hand grenade to morale and productivity.

  33. Your opinion doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's your kind of thinking that's gotten us where we are today. I'm tired of you moneygrubbing conservatives robbing us blind and treating us as "human resources". Your "advice" is unwarranted and uneeded. We've done it your way for the last 100 years and it's fucked this country all up. It's time for something different.

    1. Re:Your opinion doesn't matter by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Wrong reply, ivanbot. Toggle and try again.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  34. i work 30 hours and hate it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    20 hour work week would be perfect

    don't tell my boss

  35. LOL by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    Welcome to life. Itâ(TM)s a tad more difficult than you may have been led to believe.

    As long as theyâ(TM)re ok with diminished buying power due to working less hours, there wonâ(TM)t be any issues.

    But we all know this likely wonâ(TM)t be the case. Thatâ(TM)s where the problems will start.

  36. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps if the workers were to join together and form some sort of cooperative group, they could express their concerns with unity and act in unison to see that those concerns were acted upon.

    But what would we call this union of people banding together to protect their interests?

  37. I don't mind long hours on a good/solid program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love working long hours on a good and fun programming project that will make a difference to others in the office will use it. It's a sense of not just helping the users, but the end result of our clients getting information faster and improved waiting times. Now.... If I'm given a programming project that I know nobody will use and is a waste of time, that's a different story.

    If you love what you do though, it isn't work. Plain and simple. Well, most of the times.