Slashdot Mirror


Large Island Declared Rat-Free in Biggest Removal Success (nationalgeographic.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: A remote, freezing, salt-spray lashed paradise for wildlife has been completely cleared of rats in the largest rodent eradication of all time, the South Georgia Heritage Trust (SGHT) announced this week. Rats are smart, adaptable, and hungry. For all these reasons, they can be incredibly voracious predators when people accidentally introduce them to remote islands, where the local animals lack evolved defenses to rodents. They have flourished even on an island as harsh and cold as South Georgia, which is so far south that it hosts penguins, elephant seals, and fur seals, as well as massive permanent glaciers.

"There are no trees, there are no bushes. All nest on the ground or underground in burrows," says Mike Richardson, Chairman of the SGHT Habitat Restoration Project Steering Committee. Such nests are easy pickings for rats. The rats -- brought to the island by whalers and sealers as early as the late 18th century -- ate the eggs and vulnerable chicks of seabirds, including albatrosses, skua, terns, and petrels. They also threatened two birds with extinction that are found nowhere else in the world: the South Georgia Pipit -- a tiny speckled songbird -- and the South Georgia Pintail, a brown duck.

The rat eradication was a massive, arduous undertaking, costing more than $13 million and taking nearly a decade. More than 300 metric tons of poison bait was dropped on the island by helicopter in three separate trips during the Austral Summers of 2010-2011, 2012-2013, and 2014-2015. Poisoned rats tend to head underground to die, Richardson says, limiting the damage caused to birds like gulls that might have otherwise eaten the poison-tainted carcasses.

5 of 134 comments (clear)

  1. Hooray! by Ghosthorseman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We introduced an invasive species and then destroyed them again at some cost to the environment. I hope it's clear that the villain in this story was not the rats.

    1. Re:Hooray! by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do we need to vilify anything?

      The time invasive species were introduced, the impact of such action wasn't known or the expected impact seems less the the reward of doing so. I know my life style isn't carbon neutral. While I try to reduce the pollution, fuel efficient cars, Using Wood Pellets vs Oil for heat, recycling what I can... I know there is much more I can do if I need to a net positive to the environment. Heck how much carbon is wasted on these posts on Slashdot?
      But the point is we do things all the time that we know isn't the best, but that is life there are trade offs we need to survive and be happy.

      Also with many environmental solutions. The reasonable expectation isn't to have it like it was before, because that is nearly impossible, but to stop the biggest problem, which will introduce smaller problems which we hope are small enough to be managed.
      The question is the Net Cost of the poison on the environment is less than the net cost of the rat infestation. Then the next question would be is there any reasonable actions that can be taken place to reduce the Net Cost of the poison.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  2. Re:Fantastic Work! by higuita · · Score: 1, Insightful

    how about all USA?!
    After that, we can take care of the remaining problems more easily! :D

    --
    Higuita
  3. Re:Now let's see what the unintended consequences by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What ever the rats were eating may now end up with a massive increase in population..

    Well... yeah. That was the entire point of the project.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  4. Re:Are we on the right side of Earth history? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In principle, stronger species replacing weaker ones is what evolution is about. Who are we to exterminate the species that succeeded?

    The stronger species. Is this a trick question or something?