Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk's First LA Tunnel Nears Completion, With Free Rides To Kick Off This Summer (newatlas.com)

The Boring Company has made some pretty impressive strides in its relatively short existence. Elon Musk first shared his vision for the company in December 2016, promising to solve traffic woes with networks of tunnels for city centers. It is now adding the finishing touches to its first burrow. From a report: In a video shared on Instagram today, Musk showed what a trip through one of these tunnels would look like. He also declared the Boring Company's first tunnel under LA to be almost complete, and that "pending final regulatory approvals, we will be offering free rides to the public in a few months."

148 comments

  1. Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...makes another claim no-one sane would believe, but the press and tech illiterates eat up.

    1. Re:Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately for Elon, my countrymen are gullible and lack the very will to question their reality. This tactic is everywhere because it works.

    2. Re:Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Um... there's a video of the tunnel. Is that CG?

      I understand that some people are conspiracy theorists, but this is getting ridiculous.

      --
      "WANTED: Sinking ship seeks rats."
    3. Re:Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for sharing your negative bullshit opinion with us, devoid as it is of any facts.

    4. Re:Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say I'll see you on the article about how this never happened in a few months, but nobody will know to post it because he won't send a press release out about his failure.

    5. Re:Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by nukenerd · · Score: 2

      ...makes another claim no-one sane would believe, but the press and tech illiterates eat up.

      Not sure what claim you are referring to. If you mean his claim that he will build a deep level subway [= underground railway] under a city, then there is no reason to disbelieve it considering that such railways were first built over 100 years ago (over 150 years ago if you include the shallow cut and cover method) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... It is established technology.

      But Musk's tunnels are tiny, as are the "trains" - single pods that will each carry only a few people (or a car I gather). The capacity will be a drop in the ocean and will do very little to "solve traffic woes" except for the small number of people it can carry. Compare London Underground tube trains which each carry around 1000 passengers and run at 90 second intervals in the peak.

      Reading the comments on that Instagram video is nauseating. The fanbois there seem to think that Musk has invented subways.

    6. Re:Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by slashdice · · Score: 1

      He bought a used tunneling machine and built a tunnel. So what. That's like a minor plot device in a pointless George Clooney movie.

      Point is, Elon Musk (like the smell from your ass) could tweet about assemlbing an ikea bookshelf and his fans would go apeshit. Christ, he does actual interesting shit (Space X), why do you need to suck his cock over boring shit like this?

      --
      Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
    7. Re:Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      And Hillary is the most qualified person in history to become president.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    8. Re:Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean like the claim to deliver an EV with 320 miles of range for $50K?
      Or the claim that he would launch a rocket, land it vertically and then relaunch the same rocket?

      You mean claims like those?

      You can hate on Musk until you're blue in the face, but the fact it, the man delivers. In fact, his company just delivered a Model 3 to my house last week. And just 15 minutes ago I saw ANOTHER Space X rocket launch from the Cape. Not on TV. I walked outside my house and looked at the sky.

      Seriously, get your heads out of the sand.

    9. Re:Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Hillary is the most qualified person in history to become president.

      Compared to every Republican president in the last half century? Absolutely. Unfortunately Americans go for theater rather than competence.

    10. Re: Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would he need to? He's got ass hats like you to yell and scream "I told you so!"

    11. Re:Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      According to this, you cannot buy a sub-$50K Tesla that has 320 miles of range. They start at just above $50K, and that model has closer to 200 miles of range.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    12. Re:Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      .. boring shit...

      I see what you did there. :-D

    13. Re:Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the idiot climate change denier.

      Did you get a ticket for rolling coal this week, asshole?

    14. Re: Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TIL being an ex-first lady thatâ(TM)s made a career out if her husbandâ(TM)s coattails makes you the most qualified.

      Oh wait, she totally got those gov gigs because she was the best candidate!!

    15. Re:Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Perchance, good sir, you can explain where one may procure a sub-$50K electric vehicle with a range of 320 miles? Absent that - continue on your trolling ways...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    16. Re: Elon Musk, desperate for a distraction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a smart loading mechanism like a ski lift where the pods never stop and you step on while they're moving slowly, he could perhaps get to one train every 10 seconds. If every train has 10 pods, and every pod 10 people, that's 36,000 people per hour, which is fairly significant.

  2. Re: Free rides to the public! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should they always be free? City busses are not free. Why should Elon's tunnel be free in perpetuity?

  3. That was fast! by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    The construction of this tunnel seems to be moving at an incredible pace. How is it going so fast?

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:That was fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will collapse the first time 10 people stand on it....

      (Too soon?)

    2. Re:That was fast! by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      I read the article...

      Is this just another subway (but smaller) or is it like a ferry where you park you car it takes you across town?

    3. Re:That was fast! by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's pretty short... it was 500 feet in October (so maybe double that now). He keeps drawing hockey stick growth curves for length (a few miles in a few months, 20 in the next year), but he also said Tesla was going to be cranking out 5k cars/week a year ago.

      It may get there, but it's going to be a slower uptake than he claims.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    4. Re:That was fast! by will_die · · Score: 1

      More like a single subway car. It would be all passenger, but a large number of cars, so limited waiting, and depending on when you read the description they would be on call.

    5. Re:That was fast! by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      The construction of this tunnel seems to be moving at an incredible pace. How is it going so fast?

      Actually, it really wasn't that fast. The tunneling started about a year ago.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    6. Re:That was fast! by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      It depends on what you mean by "this". This was their first prototype tunnel, working to develop their boring tech (the whole point of Boring Company is to get TBM speeds up and costs down by 1/2 to 1 order of magnitude). It's just a tunnel. They'll also be testing out their first Loop vehicles in it. Since it's just one leg, they'll just go from one end to the other.

      Now, as mentioned, this tunnel is just a prototype. It's to be extended to form an LA Loop system, they're getting started on a NY/DC Loop system right now, bidding for a Chicago Loop system, and planning to start a LA/SF Hyperloop system later this year (confirmed by Musk last night - with the interesting addendum that they have a straightforward way to branch in and out of the Hyperloop tunnels to serve smaller cities en route).

      Loop is underground PRT (Personal Rapid Transit). Relatively small vehicles take either people or cars. People generally - and cars always - go directly to their destination, rather than on fixed routes. At peak traffic times, passenger capsules get routed to optimal paths with a few stops on each end that group together people going from and to the same general areas (ala Uber Pool). Underground, the main routes are limited access (like highways); there's never any stopping or significant slowing down / speeding up in them. Feeder tunnels branch on and off (again, akin to a highway system rather than a subway system). Control is 100% automated. Access to and from the surface is from numerous small pod elevator shafts rather than fewer, larger stations; the surface footprint is 1-2 parking spaces per shaft (the surface footprint use is justified by how many vehicles it takes off the roads - even when people travel by car, as they're off all of the roads between the start and end of their journey).

      Hyperloop is a low-pressure variant of Loop, designed for near-supersonic speeds (and with the potential to operate in environments with higher speeds of sound as well). Several orders of magnitude lower pressure than atmosphere, many orders of magnitude higher pressure than a hard vacuum (and thus several orders of magnitude easier to maintain the reduced pressure, per unit surface area). Some air in the tubes is essential, at least to the "true" Hyperloop proposal (Hyperloop Alpha; there are now lots of other things calling themselves "Hyperloop" that are just maglev vactrains). In the HA design, the vehicles are suspended by air bearings (like an air hockey puck or hard drive platter), which is comparable to maglev in terms of energy losses. The air bearings are fed by a battery powered, water-cooled compressor, which also shunts the air ahead of the vehicle past it (preventing it from building up a high pressure zone ahead of it). Acceleration is provided by short accelerator segments. Wheels propel the craft at low speeds (akin to Loop) and in emergencies. (And to head people off, yes, Thunderf00t the Biochemist-Pretending-To-Be-An-Engineer does not know what he's talking about)

      For anyone who's curious as to what's actually proposed in Hyperloop Alpha, and what's been addressed, Link. Note that this document is several years old, so there's plenty of work that's been done since then. This predated Boring Company, so boring costs were estimated at then-current (much higher) rates, and thus boring segments were minimized. They also had to stop the route on the edges of town (like an airport) to save money, as this also predated Loop.

      --
      "WANTED: Sinking ship seeks rats."
    7. Re:That was fast! by magarity · · Score: 1

      The construction of this tunnel seems to be moving at an incredible pace. How is it going so fast?

      Look at how small it is. A typical subway train tunnel is triple that diameter. The worker at the end of the video can barely stand up without bumping his head and that's no even on a rail car with wheel undercarriage. The main way they're making this one quickly is because it will be a mini-subway. Getting in and out will be stepping down into it and sitting only while the carriage roof doubles as the door. Which I guess means the real question is how it will be ADA compliant.

    8. Re:That was fast! by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's pretty short... it was 500 feet in October (so maybe double that now). He keeps drawing hockey stick growth curves for length (a few miles in a few months, 20 in the next year), but he also said Tesla was going to be cranking out 5k cars/week a year ago.

      That's a rather poor analogy choice. Yes, Model 3 production is late, but it is following a hockey stick growth. Through Q4, production averaged a couple hundred per week. Through most of Q1 it was at 1k/wk. At the end of Q1 it jumped to 2k/wk. Now they're hitting 3k/wk not even half a quarter later.

      General rule with Musk projects: Increase estimated timelines by roughly 20-100%, depending on the project and how far ahead you're talking; he always sets ridiculously short timelines for himself. But he generally delivers in the end.

      --
      "WANTED: Sinking ship seeks rats."
    9. Re:That was fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like some pods will be used for cargo deliveries, too.

    10. Re:That was fast! by Thelasko · · Score: 2

      Look at how small it is. A typical subway train tunnel is triple that diameter.

      That's one of the ways they are speeding up construction. The amount of material that needs to be removed increases by the square of the diameter.

      Getting in and out will be stepping down into it and sitting only while the carriage roof doubles as the door. Which I guess means the real question is how it will be ADA compliant.

      Getting in and out of the "skate" will be done on the surface, where there is more room. I'm more concerned with emergency exits.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    11. Re:That was fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahaha. He generally delivers 1/2 of what he promised, multiple time the original deadline late, and using 3x - 4x as much money.

      Imagine you start building a house 3,000 square foot house and it was expected to take one year and cost $500,000. If Elon managed the project you are correct, you would eventually end up with a house.

      It would be 1,500 square feet. It would take two and a half years to complete. And it would cost $1,500,000. Then he (and apparently you) would call that a success because he delivered *something* he promises that the NEXT project will come in on time, on budget, and on spec.

    12. Re:That was fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the Phase I tunnel that was just completed is 2.7 miles long.

    13. Re:That was fast! by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      It looks like a little subway to me, which makes sense. You do not need to dig a wide tunnel if you use a smaller vehicle with circular section instead of a subway train, and take all your passengers sitting or semi-lying in several smaller vehicles rather than just a large one (the train). And you can dig a narrow tunnel faster than a wide one.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    14. Re:That was fast! by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

      So what exactly are they doing to reduce TBM costs? to me this is the most interesting part and I haven't seen any real explanation of how they are hoping to achieve this.

    15. Re:That was fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get kock bros dicks out of your mouth. They have pounded your head against the wall too many times.
      So turn around and let them ream you instead. It appears that you have an asshole built just for that.

    16. Re:That was fast! by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      General rule with Musk projects: Increase estimated timelines by roughly 20-100%, depending on the project and how far ahead you're talking; he always sets ridiculously short timelines for himself. But he generally delivers in the end.

      People love to complain about Musk's timelines. But put things into perspective. SpaceShipTwo is still under development. We're still waiting for a mid-engine Corvette.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    17. Re:That was fast! by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      The only thing I remember hearing about specifically was making smaller tunnels. Smaller tunnels require removing a lot less material, and also mean having to use less material to line the tunnel. With a focus on faster transport and using the available space efficiently they should be able to get throughput as good or better than the traditional large tunnels.

    18. Re:That was fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mid engine means the engine is between the wheels. The current corvette is already mid engined.

    19. Re:That was fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Relatively small vehicles take either people or cars.

      It will all go well until someone puts their Tesla on it and the battery pack catches fire underground.

    20. Re:That was fast! by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Loop is underground PRT (Personal Rapid Transit). Relatively small vehicles take either people or cars. People generally - and cars always - go directly to their destination, rather than on fixed routes..

      The capacity is going to be tiny, especially with cars (probably with a single occupant) occupying some of the vehicles. As for not being fixed routes, I think you will find that tunnels are pretty fixed, and fixed routes has always been a drawback with railways, which is what this is, although I know Americans hate the word.

      At peak traffic times, passenger capsules get routed to optimal paths with a few stops on each end that group together people going from and to the same general areas ... Access to and from the surface is from numerous small pod elevator shafts rather than fewer, larger stations

      If there are going to be numerous stations (your elevator shafts), you are going to be waiting around for some time to collect enough people going to the same destination or near it to fill a vehicle (even a smallish one) - unless it is a major destination (eg airport) in which case you would be better off with one of those old-fashioned large stations.

      Going back to the "fixed route" point, it would be faster to take vehicles on fixed routes and change once or even twice to get to a particular destination (as now with conventional suburban railways) than to wait around to fill a pod with people going the same place as yourself. I used to commute daily by London Underground, and got to recognise the regular people who got on the same station as I did. None of them went to the same destination as I did, or near it. I'd probably have needed to wait all day to fill a Loop vehicle (with what? 8 people?) even if then.

      Feeder tunnels branch on and off (again, akin to a highway system rather than a subway system). Control is 100% automated

      Conventional subways have those too.

      . Access to and from the surface is from numerous small pod elevator shafts ..... the surface footprint is 1-2 parking spaces per shaft (the surface footprint use is justified by how many vehicles it takes off the roads

      You mean parking spaces on the road? Musk really believes he will be granted free city-centre land for his stations? Good luck with that.

    21. Re:That was fast! by Software · · Score: 1

      Mid-engine, when used to refer to cars, means the engine is behind the passenger compartment and in front of the rear axle. Nobody in the automotive press refers to the current Corvette (C7) as mid-engined. The next-generation (C8) Corvette has been strongly rumored to be mid-engined.

    22. Re:That was fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fascinating. I only remember writing a check for $52K for the model 3 that they delivered to me and which I am now driving.

      I guess you're thinking of a different Elon Musk.

    23. Re:That was fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So loop is less efficient than a one lane raod, but by god, it will be government subsidized and therefore great ... for Musk's pocketbook.

    24. Re:That was fast! by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      many orders of magnitude higher pressure than a hard vacuum

      Can the difference between zero and [any figure over zero] ever be measured in meaningful 'orders of magnitude?'

    25. Re: That was fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You being one of the few people to get the model 3 they reserved, given the high profile of that debacle, might be the worst counterpoint you could possibly have given.

    26. Re:That was fast! by Rei · · Score: 1

      That's one thing of many. Most focus on the cutting head speed, which is limited at present by the balance between cutting disc temperature and their wear rate. Boring Company is working to address this with more modern alloys on the cutting discs and a more elaborate cooling system for them. Wear rate also has to be minimized normally because swapping out discs requires stopping the head. Boring Company is working to make them hot swappable, so it's not as critical that they last as long. Downtime is normally also needed (roughly half of the TBM's time is spent down) for casing, since they push off the end of the casing. Boring Company is working to press off the sides of the casing rather than the ends, so that it does not need to stop for casing.

      --
      "WANTED: Sinking ship seeks rats."
    27. Re:That was fast! by Rei · · Score: 2

      Wrong, and wrong. There are no subsidies for Loop; it's entirely privately funded.

      --
      "WANTED: Sinking ship seeks rats."
    28. Re:That was fast! by Rei · · Score: 1

      The capacity is going to be tiny, especially with cars (probably with a single occupant) occupying some of the vehicles.

      Please go back and re-read, particularly the part up to "UberPool".

      As for not being fixed routes, I think you will find that tunnels are pretty fixed

      No more fixed than roads. A typical subway system may have a dozen or so intersections between lines in a city, depending on the size. This will have thousands.

      and fixed routes has always been a drawback with railways, which is what this is, although I know Americans hate the word.

      A railway is a transportation system based on rails. By definition. Loop has not officially announced whether it will use rails or not; both wheels on rails and wheels not on rails are under consideration.

      The term for this is PRT. It's a term that's been around for decades. Use the right term.

      If there are going to be numerous stations (your elevator shafts), you are going to be waiting around for some time to collect enough people going to the same destination or near it to fill a vehicle

      Not to beat a dead horse, but: "Please go back and re-read, particularly the part up to "UberPool"" If you don't know what that is, google it.

      During off-peak hours (most hours), people go directly to their destination (the Loop pods act like private cars, just in constant use rather than parked). During peak hours, a routing algorithm groups people together so that there's a minimum number of stops and delays to group people together between destinations.

      it would be faster to take vehicles on fixed routes and change once or even twice

      That's why traveling by bus is so much faster than traveling by car, right?

      Conventional subways have those too.

      Subways are not structured the same as highways.

      Musk really believes he will be granted free city-centre land for his stations?

      No. But thanks for making random assertions and attributing them to Musk.

      --
      "WANTED: Sinking ship seeks rats."
    29. Re:That was fast! by Rei · · Score: 1

      Hard vacuum is not "zero matter".

      --
      "WANTED: Sinking ship seeks rats."
    30. Re: That was fast! by Rei · · Score: 1

      If by "few", you mean "tens of thousands", with several thousand more per week, then sure.

      --
      "WANTED: Sinking ship seeks rats."
    31. Re:That was fast! by Rei · · Score: 1

      Wow, I forgot all about SpaceShipTwo. They're still working on that thing?

      --
      "WANTED: Sinking ship seeks rats."
    32. Re:That was fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a link that you may find helpful:
      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=what+does+hard+vacuum+mean

    33. Re:That was fast! by nukenerd · · Score: 2

      Smaller tunnels require removing a lot less material, and also mean having to use less material to line the tunnel.

      Brilliant. Why did no-one else think of that? Let's have 2ft diameter tunnels and fit people along them lengthways.

      With a focus on faster transport and using the available space efficiently they should be able to get throughput as good or better than the traditional large tunnels.

      You are not going to fill space more efficiently than existing subways. London Underground trains (with which I am familiar) almost scrape their tunnels (and really do occasionally) and the passengers are jam-packed inside at peak times.
      http://www.londontravelwatch.o...
      http://mkshft.org/observed-cro...

      To beat the London Underground, Musk's Loop will need to be able to move over 40,000 passengers per hour along each tunnel. You won't do that with lots of little separate vehicles, partly because of the gaps ("headway") needed between them (a conventional train zeros the gaps between its constituent vehicles) and partly because of the Loop's inefficiency with passenger loading. With a conventional train, all its constituent vehicles are loading simultaneously; with Loop vehicles each vehicle loads separately and hence sequentially.

    34. Re: That was fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You just described the best scenario of Lockheed, state road, building, public transit, and IT related projects...

      By that pathetic metric, Musk is doing pretty darn awesome!

    35. Re:That was fast! by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to beat London's underground. It just has to be faster than the 405 at rush hour.

    36. Re: That was fast! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Well, unless you have other estimates, it seems there are about 1700 Model 3s built per week. So they are finally getting close (other than a "push week" for show) to the goal promised for last October...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    37. Re:That was fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, a lot of hate for Elon, especially on the day he landed his 25th rocket, and the first one designed to be reused up to 10x times without retrofitting.

      He has literally cracked the code for dropping space payloads by *two* orders of magnitude of cost.

      So it is a bit disingenuous to claim that he is "all talk".

    38. Re:That was fast! by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Citation? The article was out of date, but had a much lower number.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    39. Re:That was fast! by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      That's a rather poor analogy choice.

      It was an deliberate choice. Model 3 doesn't seem to be following a hockey stick. Maybe a linear growth curve.

      And yes, it's late. That was kind of my point.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    40. Re:That was fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction: I misread an LA Times story and got two tunnels confused. As a result, I described this as a 2.7-mile tunnel in West Los Angeles, when in fact that's a different tunnel that has been proposed but hasn't been constructed yet. This tunnel, in contrast, is located around SpaceX headquarters in Hawthorne. Musk hasn't revealed its exact length, but the company submitted a proposal for a 2-mile tunnel at the site last year. We regret the error.

      https://arstechnica.com/cars/2...

      This is not where I saw it originally but was the easiest to find today with the correction.

    41. Re: That was fast! by Namarrgon · · Score: 2

      Ironically your link was just updated. Guess what it now says?

      Total cars: 25,506
      Per week: 2,473

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    42. Re:That was fast! by Alien7 · · Score: 1

      Bust unions and then pay employees half as much, at least that's what Elon's got to is.

    43. Re:That was fast! by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

      I am surprised that the cutting wheels are not hot swappable, but from what I can see from images it looks like most of them are attached directly to the head rather than having individual mounts. I wonder if it would be possible to design the system so that there were multiple heads that alternated service, giving one set time to cool while another was digging?

  4. Mini-BART by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    People who think BART is claustrophobic will be in for a rude awakening.

  5. Is it reinforced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Lots of earthquake risk in LA.......

    1. Re:Is it reinforced? by necro81 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Damn, I knew I was forgetting something! Thank you, Anonymous Coward, for pointing out this glaring design flaw to me. --Elon

    2. Re:Is it reinforced? by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      honestly while I do like quite a bit of what Elon does, there are indeed times I think he really does jump the gun and start building, long before something is even fully plausible on paper. The technical requirements and problems in the hyper-loop (thermal expansion problems, and just in general trying to make hundred mile long functioning vacume tubes). Those limits and requirements seem... pretty insane to me.

    3. Re:Is it reinforced? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Now that necro81 provided the sarcasm, I'll add the response: when you're in the ground itself, everything moves together, and thus provides little shear force. Earthquakes are more dangerous to structures on the surface because their inertia tries to hold the top still while the base is shaken by the ground.

      --
      "WANTED: Sinking ship seeks rats."
    4. Re:Is it reinforced? by Chas · · Score: 0

      If they die and get buried, at least they won't sue.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    5. Re:Is it reinforced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the info.

      It’s not my field, but there’s no way the cement or whatever they use to line the tunnel is unitary. Wouldn’t there be weak points where the different sections meet?

    6. Re:Is it reinforced? by Solandri · · Score: 2

      The bigger problem in Los Angeles is tar. The ground in the region was once the top oil producing field in California. Most of the oil has been pumped out, but the tar remains. The La Brea Tar Pits are the most visible example.

      When Los Angeles first planned an underground subway system in the 1980s, the cost estimate was $400 million. Soon after they began digging, they had to stop because workers would go home for the night, and return the next day to find the newly-dug tunnel walls were covered in tar which had seeped through overnight. The tar made a mess of their equipment and prevented laying down uniform concrete walls. The project was put on hold for years as they worked on designing a way to hold back the tar as they dug. By the time they finally got a process figured out, the additional time, design, and equipment had ballooned the cost to nearly $2 billion - then the most expensive public works project in history (later surpassed by the Big Dig in Boston).

    7. Re:Is it reinforced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elon is most certainly prototyping technology for his Mars colony dream. Efficient boring technology and the hyper-loop related technology could find their use in creating an underground Mars base. So he is probably pushing as hard and fast as he can.

    8. Re:Is it reinforced? by chispito · · Score: 5, Insightful

      honestly while I do like quite a bit of what Elon does, there are indeed times I think he really does jump the gun and start building, long before something is even fully plausible on paper. The technical requirements and problems in the hyper-loop (thermal expansion problems, and just in general trying to make hundred mile long functioning vacume tubes). Those limits and requirements seem... pretty insane to me.

      Then let him try and, if he fails, fail. Let him fail another twenty times if if yields just one more Spacex.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    9. Re:Is it reinforced? by onepoint · · Score: 1

      I did not know that, and tar can be refined and used.
      if it's carefully done, I bet he can mesh the outside of the tube and have it act as a gathering area and let gravity take it down.

      thanks

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    10. Re:Is it reinforced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of earthquake risk in LA.......

      Compared to, oh, I dunno. San Francisco? Or Tokyo? Would you rather be above ground in a car? Do you know, do you even remember, how many people died when the Nimitz freeway pancaked during the Loma Prieta quake in 1989? And then how many BART riders died during the same quake?

      Are you aware that being underground, in caves and tunnels, is considered safer than above ground during a quake?

      I guess it's more fun to play Chicken Little and run around yelling that the sky is falling. You probably worry about hydrogen in fuel cell cars blowing up too. Blissfully ignorant of the fact that gasoline leaking out of a ruptured gas tank has something like 10x the potential energy of hydrogen, and it's in a puddle under your car; the hydrogen just dissipates into the air. (But oh, remember the Hindenburg. Yeah, the only people that died in that were the ones who panicked and jumped.)

      I bet you're a ton of fun at parties.

    11. Re:Is it reinforced? by Newander · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the very low shear forces make this less of a problem.

      They talk about it in their FAQ.

      --

      Jesus saves and takes half damage.

    12. Re:Is it reinforced? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      The good news is that there is already underground infrastructure in LA, as well as Tokyo, and other earthquake-prone cities. There's a chance that there is already some structural engineering expertise with this kind of thing available.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    13. Re:Is it reinforced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps this is why the Boring company builds the concrete walls at the same time as they run the boring machine.

    14. Re:Is it reinforced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get why people care so deeply and personally about what Elon Musk is doing. It is insane. I think he is doing cool stuff, but I am just NOT invested in any of it. If he succeeds, great. If he does not succeed, that kind of sucks.

      People are just insane and irrational.

  6. Elite public transit? by Comboman · · Score: 1

    And once that's done, only rides for the elite. The public can go fuck itself!

    Convincing the elite to ride public transit would be quite a trick. Not that I would complain about it; more room on the roads for the rest of us.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:Elite public transit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you lived in a proper city, you would see people of all walks of life using public transit.

      LA is hardly a proper city. Try looking at Chicago, Toronto, Montreal, New York City, Paris, London, Amsterdam, and any other city that considers public transit important to the well being of the city.

    2. Re: Elite public transit? by Kristoph · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The billionaire I work for regularly takes the subway in NYC. In fact, he berates me when I am in an Uber and running late while he is already at the destination having taken the subway.

    3. Re: Elite public transit? by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised he gets there at all with today's MTA

    4. Re: Elite public transit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA HA he is tricking you. Of course is there first, he just have to walk from the landing pad on the roof ;)

    5. Re: Elite public transit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, Alfred (Mind if I call you Alfred?).

      He conveniently parks the Huracán in the usual spot near the station, and gets on the subway that happens to be ten minutes away from the drop off. Naturally, all outward signs of his nighttime crimefighting have been wiped clean.

    6. Re:Elite public transit? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Yea, I love that mental image he conjured up in his fantasy world too. I'm just imagining all those greedy rich people crowded into the subway station to take advantage of this new extra-posh train ride. Seriously hilarious.

    7. Re:Elite public transit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Elite have been taking helicopters to work since the late 70s.

      In that vein, this seems a superior solution in all ways.

  7. ad blockers by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    I find more and more sites display a popup window telling me I need to turn off my ad blocker... when I don't use one. Hell, the dialog box is blocking some of the ads. Unfortunately, there is no button for "I'm not using an adblocker" so they don't get the message. It sure would be nice if they tested their own sites. I am almost certain that the problem is with the "do not track" options.

    1. Re:ad blockers by Bradmont · · Score: 4, Informative

      Try opening the page in Firefox, then click the little reader mode button in the address bar. Honestly, reader mode is the best feature in any web browser at the moment...

    2. Re:ad blockers by doom · · Score: 1

      There are pop-ups everywhere, for every damn thing imaginable-- they're always bugging you to sign up for a mailing list or some damn thing. The current generation of site designers seems to feel no site is complete without an annoying JS popup. I've essentially stopped trying to read anything at medium.com because they keep bugging me to do something.

    3. Re:ad blockers by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Try opening the page in Firefox, then click the little reader mode button in the address bar. Honestly, reader mode is the best feature in any web browser at the moment...

      Safari has offered Reader Mode since 2010 - and, yeah, it’s a great feature.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:ad blockers by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      What does reader mode do?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:ad blockers by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Well, the absolutely delicious irony is that if you were using an ad blocker, you'd be able to block that overlay. My guess is that the do-not-track disables some JS, and that's likely what's causing the issue, or you otherwise block JS from running.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    6. Re:ad blockers by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'll try that!

    7. Re:ad blockers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh fuck off, mac snob.

    8. Re:ad blockers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does reader mode do?

      It removes most of the clutter and simplifies the page layout. The end result is something of what you'd expect of a e-book reader (mostly letters and displaying those well).

    9. Re:ad blockers by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

      I don't have this button? The Firefox help says it only shows up if the webpage is reader view compatible, which I'm assuming none are because they want you to see their ads.

  8. Re:Free rides to the public! by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    Elites don't ride underground. That's for the Morlocks. The Eloi ride on monorails.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  9. Re:Free rides to the public! by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

    Got anything to back that up? Anything at all other than just being a hater? No?

    It states on the Instagram post:

    As mentioned in prior posts, once fully operational (demo system rides will be free), the system will always give priority to pods for pedestrians & cyclists for less than the cost of a bus ticket.

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  10. The next toy to play with by Snufu · · Score: 0

    until the subsidies dry up or the cost and complexity of implementing at scale slap the project back into reality. Then Musk will get 'bored' and move onto the next distraction. Musk is not a visionary, he just has the internet jackpot fortune to kickstart his adolescent fantasies far enough to get press adulation.

    "A subterranean commuter expressway. I'll call it a 'Sub-Way'. Why didn't anyone think of this before? I'm brilliant!"

    All of his ventures operate at loss or through subsidy or in unique markets with no competitor (SpaceX)

    1. Re:The next toy to play with by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      or in unique markets with no competitor (SpaceX)

      You're funny.

    2. Re:The next toy to play with by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Orbital/ATK and ULA went out of business? Damn, that's hard times for Boeing and Lockheed Martin...

      Oh, no, you're just wrong about everything you said.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    3. Re: The next toy to play with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You miss the part where musk paid congress to remove ULAs ability to buy the engines that congress required them to use

  11. Re: Free rides to the public! by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
    Hmm....why do I see in the future...one good earthquake, and BOOM...tunnels fill up and kill 1000's...?

    HEY, wait a minute, maybe I have it backwards....Elon is taking his cue from the Superman movie (Christopher Reeves)....and like Lex Luthor, he's trying to cause the faults out there to trigger and drop off a bunch of CA into the ocean, and create "new" beach front property.

    This time, however, he's using a drill instead of missiles!!!

    He IS a genius!!!

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  12. I've seen this before... by dbwells · · Score: 2

    Preeeetty sure that's just footage from Sewer Shark. This is fake news.

    Long live the Sega CD!

  13. This guy is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to sound like a fanboi, but let's give credit where credit's due:

    -- Musk has an Ivy League physics degree and a Wharton econ degree, and was accepted into Stanford's PhD physics program.
    -- Musk is actually creating infrastructure - doing science and advancing technology with Tesla, Boring, SpaceX, and even PayPal.
    -- Musk has a deep understanding of both humans and human systems, as well as science and technology, and is improving society. The "cult of the rich guy" that sprang up during the 90s and 2000's had this type of person in mind, not your typical sociopathic Wall Street robber baron.

    This is much more than a ride-hailing app (Uber) that got lucky during a central-bank induced liquidity tsunami, and seeks to undercut taxi unions and suppress wages. I recall Kalanick speaking derisively of Musk. These guys are on two separate planes. There are a lot of people with a "CEO-view" of people. In this case, one brings a lot more to the table than the other, and is doing very different things for society.

  14. Re:Free rides to the public! by Pikoro · · Score: 1

    The Eloi are cattle. The Morlocks ruled.

    --
    "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  15. Tesla 3 employees by DogDude · · Score: 1

    He took half of the employees who are supposed to be building the Tesla 3's and made them dig this silly hole, instead.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  16. Re:Free rides to the public! by quenda · · Score: 1

    The Eloi are cattle. The Morlocks ruled.

    Nobody ruled. The Morlocks lived *underground* and kept the machines working. They were descended from the working class, and the Eloi from the elite.
    The Eloi were only cattle in the sense that they were eaten :-)

  17. If adding roads reduced traffic congestion... by Ichijo · · Score: 1

    ...then by now, after decades of building roads, Los Angeles would be traffic free! But maybe it will work this time.

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    1. Re:If adding roads reduced traffic congestion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naaa... we just need two tunnels... and one more lane on the 405! That will surely solve all our problems! (meanwhile another million car owners move to LA and the traffic gets even worse)

    2. Re:If adding roads reduced traffic congestion... by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      I guess it's not common knowledge, but since the disassembling of the Red Cars, various local interests and property owners killed the plans for almost half of the freeways that were originally intended to have been built to take up the slack. And that was before the greater metropolitan area had 9 million residents with an average of 2 vehicles per person.

  18. Re:Free rides to the public! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Eloi were only cattle in the sense that they were eaten :-)

    I'm sure cows don't realise they're being kept around to be eaten either ...

  19. You call them free rides... by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

    I call them beta testers. However if something goes wrong it's not the kind of crash you expect.

  20. speed to airports by Kludge · · Score: 1

    Elites fly. Give elites a faster way from downtown to the airport, they will take it.

  21. Re: Free rides to the public! by slew · · Score: 1

    Hmm....why do I see in the future...one good earthquake, and BOOM...tunnels fill up and kill 1000's...?

    HEY, wait a minute, maybe I have it backwards....Elon is taking his cue from the Superman movie (Christopher Reeves)....and like Lex Luthor, he's trying to cause the faults out there to trigger and drop off a bunch of CA into the ocean, and create "new" beach front property.

    This time, however, he's using a drill instead of missiles!!!

    He IS a genius!!!

    Perhaps he's actually taking a cue from Max Zorin in A view to a kill...

    Of course this whole LA tunnel train is so what's old is new again... Been there, done that...

    And yet for three decades several hundred trolley cars rattled through the 4,325-foot-long tunnel each day. When it opened for service on December 1, 1925 , L.A.’s first subway shaved 15 minutes off travel time between downtown and other points like Hollywood and Glendale.

    And oh, yeah, the The Pacific Electric, nicknamed the Red Cars, was (like many of that era) a privately owned mass transit system...

    So what happened? The question you might want to ask is Who Framed Roger Rabbit?

  22. Single Bore Tunneling and single rich guy by k6mfw · · Score: 2

    Wednesday I attended IEEE-SCV CES meeting where Dennis Ratcliffe presented VTA/BART extension to and under downtown San Jose. The game changer is the single bore tunnel digging, a technique that is new for underground subways. Contrast to the cut-and-cover used for LA Metro and for BART on Market st in 1960s (Dennis said it took 35 years for SF to economically recover from that). They can proceed boring a tunnel under downtown SJ without disrupting downtown. This was done in Barcelona so SJ will not be the first, however, many other cities are looking at how this will proceed.

    Another game changer is a single rich guy (single as in not slaved to stock market share holders) who can plunk down a billion dollars and say "build it." Musk still needs to comply with regulatory matters but he doesn't have to deal with bureaucratic tussles to get money. Dennis Ratcliffe said in 2001 when extension was conceived, VTA had to come up with the money to pay for BART extension (guess all the politics in this one). There are funds from Federal Transit Administration but they delayed funding Phase 2 until VTA/BART completes Phase 1. And when this began economy took a dump so all that forecasted tax revenue decreased. But they slowly got moving and economy improved. However, it took a dump again in 2008 (but real estate got cheap so VTA bought property for stations). Elon simply tells his people to start digging on his property. I haven't looked at details but he probably funded others to build smaller and more tailored boring machine than what VTA/BART is using.

    Single bore tunneling is not new except for subways. This provides option for many cities, the race may be will it be done by public agencies or by private companies.

    Elon Musk can sim

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
    1. Re:Single Bore Tunneling and single rich guy by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      ignore that last sentence (leftover from draft)

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    2. Re:Single Bore Tunneling and single rich guy by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

      Though single bore might be new, boring in general is not. A significant part of the DC metro was bored, including 11 stations.

    3. Re:Single Bore Tunneling and single rich guy by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      All the underground stretches of Seattle’s Link have been bored as well. I think when people say “new” here they mean “fairly recently has become mainstream”, not “this is the first time”.

      On a side note, I’m curious to see what Musk’s throwaway “few months” comment actually translates into. It seems like someone else turned that into “this summer” by pulling it out of his nether regions. I realize that’s a very small tunnel, but it doesn’t look anywhere near finished - the boring is the easy part.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Single Bore Tunneling and single rich guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Single bore or otherwise, TBM is a mature technology. It can be slow with conventional systems, especially in actual rock (how much of Elon's Test Tunnel is in something harder than alluvial fill?), but technologically there are no surprises. LA has an example of conventional TBM happening with its (grossly over-budget and overdue, as usual) cross-downtown light rail subway link.

      http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-regional-connector-20151112-story.html
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regional_Connector
      https://www.metro.net/projects/connector/
      https://la.streetsblog.org/2018/01/19/metro-retires-regional-connector-tunnel-machine/

      Some of the streetsblog comments kind of point toward one thing Musk seems to be trying to do: make the machine more reusable, not customized for each project's conditions. Sound like SpaceX?

    5. Re:Single Bore Tunneling and single rich guy by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      article by Dennis Ratcliffe on "Can Single-Bore Tunneling Transform Urban Subway Construction?"
      http://www.vta.org/News-and-Me...

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    6. Re:Single Bore Tunneling and single rich guy by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      The problem with tunnel bores like this is it creates the need for escalators or high capacity elevators. The cut and cover method results in something that people can just walk down 2-3 flights of stairs to get to stations. The time from surface to platform is much lower with the "old" stations.

      It would be far better if cities took the "temporary pain for permanent improvement" approach and continued with cut and cover. Yes pipes and cables will need to be moved.

      There's also the emergency evacuation consideration. I was on an NYC subway train during the 2004 blackout. It took 2 hours for them to get our train evacuated, during which time all the battery operated emergency lights in the nearest station had completely drained - the only light which worked were the turnstile "exit" arrows floating in a sea of complete darkness. after one flight of stairs there was sunlight. Evacuating through 10-20 flights of seldom used emergency stairs in complete darkness seems nightmarish. One person misses a step and falls, and suddenly it's a trampled mess.

    7. Re:Single Bore Tunneling and single rich guy by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      Also what is new is boring into soils previously too difficult. London has perfect clay soil for boring. San Jose tunnel will be below water table so boring machine has to deal with that (pressurizing). And this gives other cities options, plus Musk's team demonstrating actual working hardware like his other team showed a reusable rocket (this gets people's attention).

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
  23. Is he going to sell those machines? by jcr · · Score: 1

    I've seen some properties with mesas on them that I'd like to bore some passages through.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  24. How fast? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this could be interesting. If that is able to run under ground at speeds of say 60-180 MPH, this would make a huge difference in city transportation.
    One thing about Musk, is he is changing society for the better.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:How fast? by CrazyCaps · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he is doing things that normal people would have been discouraged from doing a long time ago.

      And if he gets this really going, the hyperloop would make traveling between big cities happen much faster.

      --
      Drive it like you stole it!
  25. fake news & pictures by niittyniemi · · Score: 0

    I had a look at the pictures and they've clearly just been knocked up in photoshop.

    If his bogus company truly was putting the "finishing touches" to a tunnel, then he wouldn't have to do that or put another 'imagineered' video up on Instagram because a real video would be impressive enough!

    He would also tell us where exactly the tunnel goes from and to.

    I've had enough of this scam artists bollocks. He should be thrown in prison; which I think he will be in the not too distant future.

    --
    The Machine stops.
    1. Re:fake news & pictures by linuxguy · · Score: 1

      "I've had enough of this scam artists bollocks."

      I can't tell if you are joking or serious.

      The scam artist has been building electric cars and rockets for years. The real things. Do you know any other scam artists doing that?

    2. Re:fake news & pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've had enough of this scam artists bollocks."

      I can't tell if you are joking or serious.

      The scam artist has been building half assed electric cars and rockets for years.

      One of his half assed electric cars just burned their passengers to death.

    3. Re:fake news & pictures by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      In other news, about 3500 other people were murdered by their cars today alone. The drivers disclaim all responsibility.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    4. Re:fake news & pictures by niittyniemi · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if you are joking or serious.

      The scam artist has been building electric cars and rockets for years. The real things. Do you know any other scam artists doing that?

      He has built less cars than Ferrari have in the same time and his production line is always just "...6 months away from producing <insert ludicrous figure> cars". The other differences between Tesla and Ferrari is that the cars Ferrari build is not done at a thundering loss and nor are they dishonestly pitched to customers so that they think they're self-driving with the inevitable tragic results.

      As for the rockets, they are cross-subsidised and he has entirely failed to address the Arianespace CEO's pertinent observations:

      "challenges of reusability ... have not disappeared. ... The stress on stage or engine structures of high-speed passage through the atmosphere, the performance penalty of reserving fuel for the return flight instead of maximizing rocket lift capacity, the need for many annual launches to make the economics work – all remain issues."

      The Falcon 9 engine is supposed to be re-usable but only half a dozen or so have been re-used so far and then only once.

      The fact of the matter is that with rocket engines you design them with a very small safety factor & hence the materials are at their limits. To do otherwise means excess material and more weight. To do otherwise and use fuel (which itself needs carrying aloft) to land the now shagged engine is absurd.

      To top things off, last week in a conference call with financial types, he basically tells them to go and boil their heads when they ask him tricky finance type questions and then even more insultingly only responds to the "When are you going to build a space elevator out of unobtainium, Elon?" type questions from fanbois.

      By doing that, he just pissed over any chance of getting further investment from the big players and has just hastened the demise of his shonky companies.

      The tragedy is not only the lives he has taken in order to satisfy his ego but the chilling effect it will have on future investment for people who aren't charlatans.

      --
      The Machine stops.
    5. Re:fake news & pictures by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Have some understanding. If you were born and raised in the back woods of Kentucky, you would have trouble believing electric cars really exist, too.

  26. Re: Free rides to the public! by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    Musk states in the linked post: "As mentioned in prior posts, once fully operational (demo system rides will be free), the system will always give priority to pods for pedestrians & cyclists for less than the cost of a bus ticket." Which probably means a couple dollars.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  27. Re: Free rides to the public! by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    If there's an earthquake, underground is definitely where you want to be. It doesn't shake down there like it does on the surface.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  28. Another brilliant Silicon Valley disruption! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Techbro accidentally reinvents Subway. News at 11."

  29. Musk v.s. safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you can't get out of it with any haste in the case of a fire. Sounds like 1800's safety standards have been blown off.

  30. Underground is where you want to be? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    It would be very interesting if you explained that, or provided a link.

  31. Something not adding up by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    A fast tunnel bore is about 60 feet per day. He's claiming 13 MILES in 1 year; that would be about 200+ feet per day. I guess Musk is - once again - over-promising, and under-delivering. But that makes sense - an issue with Tesla came up, so time to pop out comments about another adventure to distract the masses!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  32. Re: Free rides to the public! by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    I think a bus ticket is still less than $2 here.

  33. Impossible! Never happened! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Impossible! Never happened!

    The Slashdot Luddites have already told us that there's no possible way that he can ever tunnel under LA, so this is Fake News® just like the Moon Landing.

    (Yes, that's sarcasm, since it's so hard to tell these days. I've already seen the other comments where the usual idiots have declared that it's impossible even in this thread. As always, they have no idea what they're talking about, but they like to be sure that their idiocy is vomited all over everywhere.)

  34. The Real Purpose of the Boring machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is to build tunnels on Mars.

    It had to be small enough to fit on a rocket. Building one on Mars or any other planet is not an option.
    Going underground on any extra planetary body is a 100% must.
    Being able to turn or refine what you dig out is the second piece of the puzzle. (including making fuel on mars)
    My guess is that the next stage is to make the boring machine as light as possible.

    Also if you look at all E.Musk's companies they have a Mars centric purpose.

    Solar panels are going to be needed in abundance to create fuel on Mars. Batteries Ditto.

    Tesla's real purpose is the create a highly automated manufacturing line, there is (probably) a reason why the Model Y is gong to a new factory, Musk needs to test the portability of assembling a new factory. My guess is that he want to take it with him off planet.

    Also: there is s little other reason for Tesla to not use off the shelf components and contractors if its purpose was to make profitable cars alone. This isn't about Tesla's success as a company (although that is very important)

    Its about creating a portable manufacturing system that can build anything anywhere.

    Others:
    Satellite internet, Will also be needed on any other planet. (even more so then here)

    Space X, that's the only publicly viable arm of the grand plan. I wonder if the Circumference of the BFR and the Boring machine matches?

    Just my armchair observation. I think its probably short of the real plans.
    And exciting as hell. I hope it happens in my lifetime.

    1. Re:The Real Purpose of the Boring machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BFR Diameter 9Mt (30feet)
      Boring Machine Diameter 4.26Mt (14Feet)

       

  35. Re:Keep fucking that chicken BIGLY son by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It makes you look soooo much smarter than the Chinks and Sauds that own all your debt.

  36. Tunnels and earthquakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One ought to research issues with tunnels and earthquakes and guess what, i did. It takes no great effort and tunnels so long as they do not cross seismic fault lines are unffected by earthquakes... look in wikipedia as an example