Slashdot Mirror


North Korea Announces Plans To Dismantle Nuclear Test Site (npr.org)

The Associated Press is reporting North Korea has announced plans to dismantle its nuclear test site between May 23 and 25. The dismantling will occur before President Trump is scheduled to meet with Kim Jong-un in Singapore on June 12. NPR reports: Reuters reports that Punggye-ri nuclear test site has been the location of all of North Korea's six known nuclear tests. At the site, there's a system of tunnels under the mountain Mount Mantap. Journalists from the United States, South Korea, China, Russia and Britain will be invited to watch a special ceremony in which all of the tunnels at the testing ground will be destroyed and observation and research facilities and guard units will be taken down. The North Korean government will provide journalists with a charter flight from Beijing to Wosnan, North Korea. From there, a train will take them to the test site in the northeast part of the country.

The AP also reports that at a ruling party meeting last month, North Korea announced the plan to close the nuclear testing ground, along with a commitment to suspend all tests of nuclear devices and ICBMs. At that same meeting, however, North Korea said it has been performing a kind of nuclear test classified as "subcritical." The "subcritical" experiments give scientists an opportunity to test weapons without causing an actual nuclear chain reaction and explosion.

38 of 217 comments (clear)

  1. "Dismantled?" by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wasn't their test site already "dismantled" by a massive tunnel collapse?

    1. Re:"Dismantled?" by DoktorMidnight · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wasn't their test site already "dismantled" by a massive tunnel collapse?

      It is actually a little annoying that while the scientific and anti-proliferation communities/groups have been discussing what has happened to the testing site, you may only find a bare hint of that discussion in the regular news. But, as one commentator here has pointed out, if we all just close our eyes and pretend that the DPRK didn't shift an entire mountain on accident and create a potentially massive environmental disaster in its backyard, then it might help facilitate the peace process. Face gets saved, and actions of desperate necessity become grande gestures of peace. All the important people can get Nobel Peace prizes and feel good about themselves.

      Welcome to Diplomacy 101, where you don't have to feel good about what you did as long as the results are acceptable.

    2. Re: "Dismantled?" by murdocj · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, he's not suggesting that. He's suggesting that this test site was already getting pretty defunct, so as a PR stunt NK is inviting everyone to watch while they blow up the old test site.

    3. Re:"Dismantled?" by zioncat · · Score: 2

      Wasn't their test site already "dismantled" by a massive tunnel collapse?

      No, North Korea's Nuclear Test Site Wasn't Destroyed in an Earthquake

      "The reporting has been mostly hot garbage," Jeffrey Lewis, a nuclear expert at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, tweeted after reviewing satellite imagery of the 7,200-foot Mount Mantap, where North Korea's Punggye-ri test site is located.

    4. Re:"Dismantled?" by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      The whole thing, the whole USA North Korea thing, was a pile of bull puckey. It was all about tying up China in a defence of North Korea to block their 'COMMERCIAL' expansion, not war, simply business. This all blew up when China would not play and although the US government attempted to keep it going, it all fell flat. So then when that North Korea gambit failed, the US government went with a trade and tarriff war but when the Government of China threw in copyright duration into the mix, that collapsed to.

      So North Korea, now has taken the opportunity to alter diplomatic rhetoric to look more conciliatory leaving the US to look like the war monger, yet again. So the US now is forced to lie and pretend it created peace because no other political option. Peace, yeah, not so much, just better public diplomatic communications in the age of the internet and saying stupid shit hangs around for ever. None look more fucking stupid in the diplomatic stakes than that budgy brain Nikki Haley, starting to get a real odour going and likely better off tossing the talking head out and replacing it with another.

      That test site had reached it's use by date and it seems North Korea finally did manage workable nukes and now delivery systems have altered from ballistics to long range torpedoes and cruise missiles. Although it has been proven that US et al cruise missiles are very vulnerable to attack from actively defended locations, however not a problem with Nuke cruise missiles because blowing one up, means it does actually properly detonate, killing that which killed it and the defended target probably still inside the destruction zone.

      Defending against nuke cruise missiles requires an airborne defence system to increase the attack range as much as possible. Torpedoes much trickier seeing as they can take their time quietly approaching the target at depth and only surfacing to detonate, coastal cities are fucked, especially one in particular, Pearl Harbour and Honolulu, pretty clear it is the number one target, neither one will survive a nuke war of even a start panic stop variety as they are the first targets, not Washington (add in 3m sea level rise and Honolulu looks to be quite the questionable investment).

      North Korean peace, not possible with the current government, if they was peace, and democratic voting occurred the current leadership would be investigated, prosecuted and probably executed, so hugely unrealistic for North Korea to undergo change without social breakdown and revolution but everyone has to pretend because the China gambit failed and there really seems to be no coming back from that, it really seems to have been the last major Asian geopolitical gambit and it failed. The only one left is fucking with Australia China trade and that would not go done well at all, cause a major irreversible rift between Australia and the US (pissing on about a China base in Vanuatu all about more American bases in Australia, which does not look to be on, which in turn is all about Australia having basically ten times as much high grade Uranium ore as the US, plus of course being the same size as the US mainland and having a largely undeveloped coastline suitable for future development post flooding, no flooded rubble to content with).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. Trump to take credit. Let's wait for the spin... by bogaboga · · Score: 2

    North Korea has announced plans to dismantle its nuclear test site between May 23 and 25.

    Just wait. Western nations are going take credit for this development; yet the North Korean leadership has stated that there's no need to test anymore as they've "mastered" how to place nuclear war heads onto ballistic missiles.

    This means there's no further need for "testing."

  3. Didn't that site collapse? by RandomFactor · · Score: 2

    Punggye-ri may not even be usable at this point. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Punggye-ri+collapse

    Awfully nice of them to offer to decommission it at this point :-p

    This is a purely symbolic gesture to improve their optics.

    --
    --- Mercutio was right.
  4. Re: Trump to take credit. Let's wait for the spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The South Korean president and Foreign Minister both said that Trump was the primary reason for NK's capitulation.

    Lots of things are spin in this day and age, but sometimes there's an actual fact that gets out. You can still hate Trump and also appreciate that he might have ended the Korean War by shitposting on Twitter.

  5. Exit ramp by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In fact, this very site has already had tests suspended indefinitely, likely because a mountain fell on it. From the article:

    "The breakdown not only took off part of the mountain’s summit but also created a “chimney” that could allow fallout to rise from the blast centre into the air"

    So, um good job Kim, taking a desperate attempt at mitigating a massive environmental disaster that could have blanketed half a hemisphere in radioactive fallout and trying to parlay it into a gesture of goodwill?

    One potential problem with Korean negotiations is the optics, and the tendency of people to dislike being proven wrong, losing face, and being shown as disingenuous or hypocritical.

    We could help the process along by giving Kim the widest exit-ramp from his situation. We don't have to be the sore, arrogant winners here.

    So let's suppose that the existing test site was partially destroyed by the collapse, and still held significant development capability. We don't know that this is *not* true.

    If the rest of the world were to take the positive view and assume the best, then this is Kim making a real effort to promote peace between the two nations.

    A highly respectable gesture, and offered before negotiations.

    Actually, that sounds 'kinda classy when you think about it.

    1. Re: Exit ramp by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      The real trouble is that people are utterly irrational in their hatred of politicians. I don't like the guy but get real. If you can't say something nice you're probably partisan.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  6. Re:Dismantled by China by jcr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Decades from now, I hope that some Chinese official lets us know in his memoirs just how close Kim Fat Ass came to getting a PRC bullet to the head.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  7. Nobel while jailed by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 4, Informative

    Can you get a Nobel prize while serving concurrent life terms for treason in Leavenworth?

    As it happens, you can get a Nobel peace prize while in prison. Most recently Liu Xiaobo was awarded the prize while jailed.

    The Nobel committee apparently doesn't use "laws of other countries" as a criterion. Why would they?

    Also as it happens, treason is specifically defined in the constitution. Nothing that Trump has been accused of comes under that definition.

    Also also, I was reading about some of the trial transcripts from Mueller's indictments, and he'll be lucky if he doesn't get slapped by the court. The Manafort case in particular had the judge asking how Mueller's investigation can extend to actions that happened ten years before the election... and the prosecution being evasive and rude to the judge... causing the judge to demand prosecution submit the full, redacted indictment recommendation.

    And in the Flynn case, the judge ordered prosecution to turn over any exculpatory evidence they have. This is unusual for a case where a guilty plea has been entered. The polite interpretation is that the judge feels Flynn might not have entered the plea because he was guilty, but because he couldn't afford a defense. The bad interpretation is that the judge might be looking into whether Flynn's plea was coerced. (Heard somewhere that prosecutors told Flynn that after they were done prosecuting him, they'd go after his wife and kids.)

    And remember those 13 Russian nationals that were indicted? Turns out, it was 13 Russian nationals and four corporate entities. And one of the entities actually showed up in court to contest the charges. The indictments were widely viewed as a PR stunt, and that Mueller never expected anyone to contest them. He wasn't expecting to actually have to go to court, he's unprepared, and prosecutors tried to postpone the trial, saying "the plaintiffs were never served notice". Plaintiffs responded with "we're here voluntarily to answer charges and intend to enter a plea of "not guilty", let's have a trial!". Judge agreed, and now Mueller is scrambling to find evidence to support a bogus indictment.

    Also, I heard that the IG report got postponed (last Wednesday) by "a couple of weeks" because they found new evidence about the Clinton E-mail investigation.

    So overall, wait about 4 weeks or so and get back to me on whether Trump will be in jail, or whether we have a dozen high-level politicians indicted on corruption charges.

    1. Re:Nobel while jailed by tomthepom · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also as it happens, treason is specifically defined in the constitution. Nothing that Trump has been accused of comes under that definition.

      The constitution defines treason against the US as adhering to its enemies or giving them aid and comfort. If a presidential candidate or surrogates secretly work with a foreign adversary to manipulate elections and get their candidate elected, that would be a pretty textbook case of treason.

    2. Re:Nobel while jailed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You gotta love the Trump apologists.

      It goes something like this:

      1. It is not that bad.
      2. Democrats did it (even if they didn't)
      3. No one really cares.
      4. Even if it happened it doesn't matter.

      Did Trump collude with russians? Yes, we have two examples of proof. First his chosen people had that meeting with Russians. Second Trump openly asked for help on national tv. Will whatever he did along those lines result in jail time? Don't know. Have to wait and see.

      Is Trump guilty of pay for play? Most certainly. Trump's lawyer, who represents Trump directly, and is presumably acting with Trump's knowledge directly accepted crazy sums of money for influence. That is obvious influence pedling.

      Is Trump guilty of reckless disregard for the environment. Yes, see scott pruit.

      Is Trump guilty of far more than Clinton was impeached for? Sure. You've got what a dozen or so women, and at least one confirmed pay off, which certainly was illegal since it was a material contribution way outside of bounds to his campaign.

      Is Trump's word good for anything? Nope. He's over 3000 lies since he took office. I believe he has been awarded lie of the year at least once, likely for the birther crap, which was a perfect example of the low form of life that he is.

      Is trump generally morally repugnant and unfit for office? Hell yes, see massive insults to gold star families, war heroes(mccain), etc, etc. Hell he just praised the leader of north korea who sent the previous guest to his country home as a vegetable. Meanwhile one of his staff said something repulsive about McCain and he does nothing.

      Was getting out of the iran deal wise? Well given that I see no real plan for a better solution, and that other major credible countries are struggling to save it, I'm going to go with no. The fact that gas prices spiked is just an added bonus.

      Did trump obstruct justice? Yes, see lester holt interview, and recent interviews by Juliani. Hell he regularly threatens to get involved with the justice department and regularly threatens to fire people. He tried and failed to push Jeff Sessions out only because he dare not actually fire him. Hell he actually apparently approved using the excuse that he fired comey because he was mean to Hillary, and no one with a brain could buy that Trump cared a crap about that.

      He also seems to be doing the odd strategy pardon, such with scooter libby, likely to give people a sign if they just hold out the fix is in. I believe his lawyers have even discussed pardoning some of the people under investigation.

    3. Re:Nobel while jailed by lucm · · Score: 2, Informative

      If a presidential candidate or surrogates secretly work with a foreign adversary to manipulate elections and get their candidate elected, that would be a pretty textbook case of treason.

      You mean like the Clinton Foundation?

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    4. Re:Nobel while jailed by dog77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A text book case of treason would be something like joining the enemy that the United States is at war with or leading an insurrection against the government. I don't think there are any examples of someone convicted for the treason you refer to in the United States history so I think that would qualify as the opposite of text book. If Russia actually used force to install Donald Trump in office like in a military coup than maybe. At most this would be a highly unusual case of treason and if you are being honest with yourself you will admit it is a stretch. It is a lot like someone on the right saying that former president Obama gave money to Iran is treason. The government of Iran is considered our enemy; a supporter of terrorism and their rockets were used to kill US soldiers in the very recent Iraq conflict. President Obama gave them our money which aids and comforts them. He did this on his own without the approval of the congress and so maybe we should put him on trial for treason.

    5. Re:Nobel while jailed by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

      The constitution defines treason against the US as adhering to its enemies or giving them aid and comfort.

      Legally, how do you define "enemy?" Answer: a country you are at war with. For the US to be at war, Congress must make a declaration. Authorizations of force don't cut it.

      Congress has not declared war since 1941. Therefore, nobody at this time can be guilty of treason. Not Chelsea Manning, not Edward Snowden, and yes, not even Trump or his associates. (And for the record, I'm no fan of Trump.)

      Treason is a serious crime. It is the only crime mentioned in the US Constitution. The criteria for being guilty of it are very stringent, and rightly so.

      If a presidential candidate or surrogates secretly work with a foreign adversary to manipulate elections and get their candidate elected, that would be a pretty textbook case of treason.

      No doubt it's an indictable offense, one that can lead to serious punishment. But it's not treason. See above.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    6. Re:Nobel while jailed by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2

      How did this drivel get modded up to 5 Informative? It's full of crap.

      Did Trump collude with russians? Yes, we have two examples of proof. First his chosen people had that meeting with Russians.

      There is no evidence any of those meetings had a direct bearing on the election and weren't just business meetings. We have nothing except the fact that Russians tried to foment division in the US by taking out FB ads and websites, some of which were pro Bernie Sanders. They went for the fringe candidates.
      As it is, it looks like any information Flynn handed over is now suspect, or due to coercion.

      Second Trump openly asked for help on national tv.

      lol To cite this as a serious matter of treason is lunacy. He said, IF they have the emails, release them. The working assumption here is, they already had them. Said in public at a rally, as a joke. Not something seriously behind closed doors.
      In any case didn't tell Russia to go hack Hillary's missing 30,000 emails that you mysteriously don't care about.
      The TV soundbyte is much ado about nothing.

      Is Trump guilty of reckless disregard for the environment. Yes, see scott pruit.

      WTF has that go to do with anything? Non Sequitur.

      Is Trump guilty of far more than Clinton was impeached for? Sure. You've got what a dozen or so women, and at least one confirmed pay off, which certainly was illegal since it was a material contribution way outside of bounds to his campaign.

      Wrong, and wrong. Here we see you really don't have any idea what you're talking about. Clinton was not impeached for having an affair; the impeachment was due to lying under oath to Congress during a hearing. Affairs aren't illegal, just immoral.
      And there is still zero evidence so far that this has anything to do with campaign contributions, except on the suggestion made by hearsay of Stormy McDaniels lawyer.

      Everything else is you belly aching.

      Is Trump a big headed lout? Yup. No contest. We had no ideal choices this election. But that's not illegal nor does it constitute treason.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  8. Re:Trump to take credit. Let's wait for the spin.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    If anything got reported, it was speculation that was reported and maybe "simplified" circular reporting of that speculation. A test chamber collapsed, because there was a frigging thermonuclear explosion in there. This means this particular place is definitely ruined. You might dig in there again and detonate a nuke again and it would be a very bad idea. But there's a bit more room than that and there are *other* tunnels that are ready, one of which the West one was actually maintained so that a test can happen on a moment's notice.

    I figure I should give sources rather than asking to take my worthless word, so here is reporting from seven months ago that warned against excessive speculation about "tired mountain syndrome" already
    https://www.38north.org/2017/10/mtmantap101717/

    Conclusion

    Nuclear tests previously conducted at the US Nevada Test Site (as well as at the former Soviet nuclear test sites) show that test-induced seismic events (small post-test earthquakes), associated with tests having magnitudes of 5.0 or more, are not unusual. Moreover, such activity did not lead to site abandonment prior to the general test moratorium in 1992. Because Mt. Mantap has been the location for the last five of six of North Korea’s declared underground nuclear tests (via the North Portal) and has undergone widespread observable surface disturbances resulting from the most recent test, it is not surprising that there were a number of post-test earthquakes. This may have caused some concern both inside and outside North Korea about “Tired Mountain Syndrome.” For the time being, however, given the presence of additional test portals, we see no reason that the Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site as a whole has or will be abandoned for future underground nuclear testing.

    Two recent ones :
    https://www.38north.org/2018/04/mtmantap043018/
    https://www.38north.org/2018/04/punggye043018/
    One has drawings and explanation to teach you what is a "chimney collapse", the other one has a terrain maps showing *three* adjacent testing areas, one of which is disturbed and two available for testing.

  9. Well Played by hduff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well played, North Korea. Well played . . .

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  10. Re: Trump to take credit. Let's wait for the spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is amusing that the South Korean leadership (who are directly talking with Kim) is giving Trump credit for ending the Korean War, and you are saying they don't know what they are talking about, yet somehow you do.

  11. Lol. Maybe after he grabbed them by the crotch by raymorris · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I believe asking nicely is what Obama did. Nice fellow, Obama.

    I don't know how much Trump had to do with this.

    Remember North Korea is smaller than Hewlett-Packard, they the US could easily destroy NK; we don't mostly because of politics. I know that if *I* were Kim Jong-un, and that wacky Trump dude were threatening to nuke my country, pointing out his big nuclear button, that would make me a bit more nervous than Obma's approach did. Trump seems like the kind of guy who just might decide, against the advice of his advisers, to go ahead and send a flight of three B-52s loaded up with 60 cruise missiles to go ahead and eliminate most of the major buildings in North Korea.

    Keep in mind, North Korea has much less industry (gdp) than Birmingham, Alabama; Jacksonville; or Memphis.
    It would be easy for Trump to just wake up one morning and decide "I'm tired of little Rocket Man. Let's blow up North Korea today and be done with it". It might not be a GOOD idea, but it would be easy for the US to do. Trump just might do something that Obama and Bush wouldn't do.

    It may be that Trump asked nicely AFTER he grabbed them by the crotch. That's more Trump's MO, just asking nicely isn't really his thing - even when he should.

    Without knowing, I can only listen to what the people who are in a better position to know have to say.

    1. Re:Lol. Maybe after he grabbed them by the crotch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They have no GDP but they have a number of virtually unpaid military conscripts that they use for building stuff, who work in the fields (e.g. harvest), prisoners too, and women are like caricatural 1950s' American wives too. What little Potemkin socialism they actually do (like building a catfish farm or something) doesn't really directly generate GDP, since they may allocate labor and resources directly. Then fish may be sold (GDP) or just taken away for use by the military (no GDP).

      That said, they really do have very little GDP and a small economy. It's fascinating how cities are immediately surrounded by undeveloped rural lands and dirt or gravel roads unless it's a very wide unpainted highway that was likely intended for military trucks, tanks and other military vehicles.
      Well, it's agrarian lands with everything made by hand :)

    2. Re:Lol. Maybe after he grabbed them by the crotch by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      I don't know how much Trump had to do with this.

      I'm merely referring to this.. Your "people who are in a better position to know" are mentioned there as well.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  12. Re:Dismantled by China by hdyoung · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Xi Jinping's memoirs will probably be fairly uninteresting, for three reasons.

    First, he inherited his leadership position. Actually, this whole generation of Chinese leaders are called "princelings" because their fathers were leaders. None of them earned their title through any sort of true merit.

    Second, nothing that he's said or written has indicated any sort of really novel thinking. His famous "socialism with Chinese characteristics" that makes up the basis of his writings basically amounts to a form of hereditary, authoritatian oligarchy. Pretty blase, boring stuff that's been tried over and over again with little success.

    Third, he's a dictator. Dictators are fairly one-dimensional, unimaginative types who have very little to add to the sum of humanity's achievements. They don't do their countries any good and very rarely leave any good legacy behind.

  13. Re:Trump to take credit. Let's wait for the spin.. by murdocj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Once NK has a credible threat to deliver a nuke on target to the USA, they really don't have to "learn" anymore. It's not like they are going to first strike and take out the USA's retaliatory capability. All they need is a credible threat, which is what they've got now.

  14. Re:Very Old News... by isdnip · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The most interesting account I saw was from, of all things, a Pakistani newspaper. It said that the test set off an earthquake. It caused a tunnel to collapse... with about 100 people in it. They may have been many of NK's nuclear scientists. And when they sent people in to try to rescue them, another collapse took out another hundred or so people. So the site is entirely unusable, and they may have lost many of their nuclear scientists in the process.

    I guess they had enough physicists but not enough geologists.

  15. Another Reason Why by Humbubba · · Score: 4, Informative
    Scientists are certain that the last detonation at the Punggye-ri nuclear test site vaporized a vast chamber of rock more than a quarter mile below Mount Mantap's summit, and created a chimney-like structure that could leak radioactive fallout into the air. Before and after spaceborn monitoring, seismic readings, thermal imagery and radar snapshots reveal a complete 3-D surface displacement.

    The only thing this site is good for now is to give Kim Jong-un a diplomatic trump card.

    http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2143171/north-koreas-nuclear-test-site-has-collapsed-and-may-be-why-kim-jong-un

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/958444/North-Korea-nuclear-missile-nuke-bomb-Punggye-ri-test-site

  16. Re:Count your chickens in Leavenworth yard by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's amazing how Trump hasn't gotten shit actually accomplished

    Well, other than a tax cut. And ending the Obamacare mandate. And moving the embassy to Jerusalem. And starting to build a real wall. And cutting 2+ regulations for every new regulation. And scaling back on Federal overreach. And pulling out of the Paris Accord. And pulling out of the Iran giveaway deal. And bringing North Korea to the table. And re-opening trade talks with China. And withdrawing from the TPP. And ending "catch and release" with illegal aliens. And 100 other things.

    But, yeah, other than that, what's he actually accomplished?

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  17. Re:Dismantled by China by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    Decades from now, I hope that some Chinese official lets us know in his memoirs just how close Kim Fat Ass came to getting a PRC bullet to the head.

    Rumor is that Kim had his uncle, Jang Song-thaek, executed in order to head off a Chinese sponsored palace coup. Jang was widely seen as "China's guy" within the NK government. China was upset about Jang's execution, but Kim sent them a very clear message that he was not going to be pushed around.

  18. Re:Dismantled by China by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 4, Informative

    You make it sound like he's walked a red carpet from the cradle straight into power, and his biography doesn't read quite like that:

    In 1963, when Xi was age 10, his father was purged from the Party and sent to work in a factory in Luoyang, Henan. In May 1966, Xi's secondary education was cut short by the Cultural Revolution, when all secondary classes were halted for students to criticise and fight their teachers. The Xi family home was ransacked by student militants and one of Xi's sisters, Xi Heping, was killed. Later, his own mother was forced to publicly denounce him as Xi was paraded before a crowd as an enemy of the revolution. Xi was aged 15 when his father was imprisoned in 1968 during the Cultural Revolution; Xi would not see his father again until 1972. Without the protection of his father, Xi was sent to work in Liangjiahe Village, Wen'anyi Town, Yanchuan County, Yan'an, Shaanxi, in 1969 in Mao Zedong's Down to the Countryside Movement. After a few months, unable to stand rural life, he ran away to Beijing. He was arrested during a crackdown on deserters from the countryside and sent to a work camp to dig ditches.

    So... he might have been born a "princeling", but that did not guarantee him an easy ride into the Politburo. (Did you know that his first nine applications to join the CPC were rejected?)

    Third, he's a dictator. Dictators are fairly one-dimensional, unimaginative types who have very little to add to the sum of humanity's achievements. They don't do their countries any good and very rarely leave any good legacy behind.

    I think you're mischaracterising his desire for stability--which appears to be both genuine and well-founded--as "lack of imagination" and ignoring both his background and its historical context. The Chinese experience of the past 120 years or so has been nothing like the American one.

    XI is a very smart guy, and he's got balls. Do not underestimate him.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  19. Re: Dismantled by China by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the driving forces of the Chinese government is to avoid another person like Mao. They were the ones who saw firsthand how bad the Cultural Revolution actually was. When they talk about stability, there is some reality behind it.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  20. Re: Trump to take credit. Let's wait for the spin by turp182 · · Score: 2

    Wait for the trade war, it is brewing.

    77,000 Chinese workers learned about this last week (ZTE, who attempted to purchase Qualcomm).
    http://money.cnn.com/2018/05/0...

    A 7 year ban on using US technologies, consider that. China will fund development of replacements, thus resolving the dependency (they probably already are/were).

    And Europe is leaning against unilateral sanctions on Iran (this is as interesting as the Chinese stuff, Europe is a different beast):
    https://www.reuters.com/articl...

    Avocado's are an interesting view as well:
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/0...

    The world is being pushed towards protectionism, through tariffs and/or sanctions.

    This is very dangerous territory.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  21. Re:Trump to take credit. Let's wait for the spin.. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

    I love Fox News. Great source of news and commentary. Possibly the most fair and balanced source of news on the planet.

    So was that as hard to read as it was to actually type it? Fair and balanced my ass. But I do like Tucker Carlson. I love that little head tilt he does when the gears in his head start to turn. Reminds me of my favorite beagle when I would magically pull a milk bone out of his ear.

    "Whos a good boy? Who's a good boy?"

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  22. Re:Trump to take credit. Let's wait for the spin.. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

    It's not that people don't think its a good thing. It is they just don't want to give Trump credit for it, or for anything. We should be clear, this was a major event and Trump actions are what lead directly too it.

    If this does go down it will become a pivotal moment in history. It could literally reshape the political climate in the area. This could be the defining moment of Trump's legacy and progressives just hate to think that Trump isn't the incompetent baffoon they make him out to be.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  23. Re: Trump to take credit. Let's wait for the spin by jwhyche · · Score: 2

    NK wants the US out of Korea completely (so does China and Russia). Now they are negotiating them out. NK wanted trade blockades ended. Trump has said he will end them. Trump has further promised that he will give US taxpayer's money to NK for de-nuking. Now there's a way forward for Iran and Cuba. If you don't have a nuke then the US hits you with sanctions. Get a nuke and the US will not only be nice to you, but actually give you money not to make any more and stop the sanctions shit.

    No he hasn't. He has not done any of this as of yet. These options will be on the table I imagine in the future, as they should be.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  24. Re:Trump to take credit. Let's wait for the spin.. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

    That would be a good guess. That is pretty much how it always goes. The leaders on the stage strut around and bluster, while quiet diplomacy happens in the background. The strutting roosters step in and take the credit.

    But what makes TDS, Trump Derangement Syndrome is every one affected by it wants to blame everything on Trump. For instance there is a thread about flat earth convention some where. And some one just had to bring up a comprising with Trump. Trump has nothing to do with flat earth or any of that nonsense but people with TDS just can't help but bring it up.

    Some people have TDS so bad they simply can not acknowledge the positive things that Trump has done. Nor can they acknowledge what is perfectly plain to every one else, even Trump critics not suffering from TDS, Trump is doing a good job as president and we are doing just fine.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  25. Re:Count your chickens in Leavenworth yard by jwhyche · · Score: 2

    See, this is the reason that so many of your liberals keep getting into so much trouble. You don't read things all they way through, and you barely think about things that you do read. An even if you do read some thing you just twist it to mean what ever you want it too. That is a symptom of TDS.

    I specifically said that was concerned about Trumps environmental policies. In fact I disagree with several of them. But here is the difference between people like me and liberals suffering from TDS. We are willing to see where the final plans start to go before we start frothing at the mouth over it.

    Again, no safe legal immigrants are being affected. What is happening is some temporary worker visas are being changed or eliminated, some at the requests of the companies that sponsor them. Temporary worker are not immigrants. Some countries have had immigration temporary altered or suspended due to unstable conditions in their country. That a temporary condition.

    DACA hasn't been cancelled. I believe Trump has given them 2 extra months for congress to act. DACA has to go. It was a good policy when implemented but now its time for proper and legal action to take place by congress. Until congress acts there is no path to citizenship for DACA recipients. Trump is just putting pressure on Congress to act.

    According certain websites there is no difference between progressives and liberal. Looks like most issues between the two overlap. So I'm just going to continue to use the term interchangeably since most suffer from the same issues and lack of understanding that I point out.

    Finally, you should stop railing so hard against anything and start paying attention to what is really happening. A pure blind hatred for anyone, even Trump, isn't good for you. Do more like I do. Praise Trump for the correct things he does. Discuss the ones that concern you. And speak out about things that you disagree on. But most important make sure you know what is actually happening and not what just some progressive blog is telling you. I recommend several news stories on a subject from several different sites. One conservative and one liberal. For me its Fox news and NPR, but I hardly call Fox news, news. More like a neutered Rush whats his name. I cant' listen to Rush, he makes my head hurt.

    Good luck with the new outlook

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.