Slashdot Mirror


Reporter Shares Experience of Visiting a Flat Earth Convention (vice.com)

Tom Usher, reporting for Vice: I arrived at the venue -- a Jurys Inn hotel -- on a wet Saturday morning, to discover that the event was essentially a small carpeted convention room boasting a few cameras, some stalls selling merchandise, and 70 or so attendees watching PowerPoint presentations beamed onto a wall. As I entered, I was offered a gift of "fluoride-free" toothpaste. This made perfect sense, given the location. A popular conspiracy theory states that governments across the world have been putting fluoride in our water supply to tranquilize the masses, despite the fact the only piece of "evidence" for this theory -- which involves both the Nazis and the Communists -- has been widely discredited. With the tone set for the day, I sat down to watch some speeches.

The speakers all seemed well aware of how "globe-earthers" view the idea of a flat Earth, i.e. ludicrous, and their talk of the current scientific establishment felt very "us versus them" -- a nice bit of truther tribalism. One speaker talked at length about the moon, and how its orbit proved the Earth couldn't be spherical, which seemed a little counterintuitive. Another talked about how the Egyptian pyramid structure points toward clues that the Earth is a flat diamond shape, supported by pillars. Between sounding off about the Vatican and the fact that the establishment has indoctrinated us to believe all sorts of things, including that the Earth is a sphere, a third speaker suggested that cancer is caused by negative emotions and argued that dinosaurs didn't exist.
The story also explores why some people still believe these long-debunked theories. Further reading: The bizarre tale of the flat-Earth convention that fell apart (CNET).

22 of 356 comments (clear)

  1. Psychosis / Mass Psychosis by Qbertino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just like religions.

    It's bizarre, isn't it?

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Psychosis / Mass Psychosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Just like religions.

      It's bizarre, isn't it?

      I dunno.

      None of those Flat Earthers were shouting Allahu akbar and beheading infidels.

      Some religions are less equal than others...

    2. Re:Psychosis / Mass Psychosis by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would call it instructive. It shows that most people do not manage to understand what Science is and what it can and cannot do, because they lack the mental capabilities to do so. It explains a few things about why so many things on this planet are so fucked up.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Psychosis / Mass Psychosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Were they shouting "Save the unborn" and bombing abortion clinics, because that's what the religious zealots do here. Before that, they shouted "Die Ni**er" and bombed black churches and neighborhoods.

      Never seen a Muslim do either of those.

      ** Lameness Filter is Lame.

    4. Re: Psychosis / Mass Psychosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, some 800 years ago Christians tried taking back land from the Muslims. Ie, war for land. Today Muslims murder people because of difference of opinion, not iver land. Totes the same today.

    5. Re:Psychosis / Mass Psychosis by Luthair · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Salem Witch Trials? Violence against interracial couples, same sex couples, anti-abortion bombings & shootings.... The only difference is that in western countries religions no longer control the government.

    6. Re:Psychosis / Mass Psychosis by goose-incarnated · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't know what you are talking about. Christians did wholesale mass-murder in the crusades, for example, in pretty much the mode you describe. There is no larger religion that has not done atrocities and justified them afterwards.

      Because some group of murderous bastards did something 800 years ago you think we shouldn't be denouncing any current group of murderous bastards who does it now?

      What most people fail to realise is that multiple and repeated surveys found that the majority of muslims *worldwide* support Sharia law.

      When you refer to "moderate muslims" you are still talking about people who would ban gay relationships and use the force of law to punish homosexuals. The number of christians who support those sorts of laws is vanshingly small.

      Stop apologising for homophobia. You should examine why you need to go back hundreds of years to find anything comparative in primitiveness to Islam.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    7. Re:Psychosis / Mass Psychosis by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The difference is the teachings of Christianity don't support those things.
      Pick up The Holy Bible and read it. Once that Jesus guy turns up, things change.

    8. Re: Psychosis / Mass Psychosis by geoskd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, some 800 years ago Christians tried taking back land from the Muslims. Ie, war for land. Today Muslims murder people because of difference of opinion, not iver land. Totes the same today.

      What about the KKK They have strong ties to Christianity and they are firmly right here in modern history.

      Or, how about the Rohingya in Myanmar, happening right now?

      We may think we are immune to that sort of thing here in the US, but a large minority of Americans voted for Donald trump for no other reason than he promised to get rid of all the Muslims. Please not that the Evangelicals *support* Donald Trump, even today in spite of the fact that nearly everything he has done in his personal life is directly antithetical to their professed beliefs.

      Religion as a concept *is* the true root of evil. It is, at its essence, one group of people claiming they are better than everyone else because God said so.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    9. Re: Psychosis / Mass Psychosis by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to Wikipedia the current wave of violence started with anti-Muslim riots in 2012 triggered by the gang rape of a Buddhist woman, despite a medical examiner saying she wasn't raped, and at least one of the alleged rapists being Buddhist.

      Framing this as "anti-muslim riots" is asinine. From your own article:

      "As of 22 August, officially there had been 88 casualties â" 57 Muslims and 31 Buddhists. An estimated 90,000 people were displaced by the violence. About 2,528 houses were burned; of those, 1,336 belonged to Rohingyas and 1,192 belonged to Rakhines."

      This doesn't seem to be consistent with your claims that "they started it".

      "They started it" would be far too simplistic of an analysis, which is why I never said any such thing. This conflict, like most such conflicts around the world, is the result of centuries of back-and-forth attacks between two distinct groups with a very long history of animosity. I'm not particularly interested in pointing fingers; I'm just annoyed by your determination to paint the Muslims as a besieged group of guiltless victims.

  2. Yeah - it's all quant and cute... by RyanFenton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Until they elect a gameshow host as president, start banning research, and screwing over everyone that doesn't kowtow.

    I wonder how Trump is going to be remembered, once it isn't seen as important for half the population that he be seen as somehow respectable. In retrospect, most conservatives see George W. Bush as a big mistake... it'll be interesting to see how that pans out.

    Why do we have to keep switching to these idiotic reactionary anti-science folks so often? What ideals does it serve? It always seems like such madness - madness yelling that it deserves respect as it disrespects everything else.

    1. Re:Yeah - it's all quant and cute... by gweihir · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He is a textbook example of "moron on top and put there by other morons".

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Yeah - it's all quant and cute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The moron that put him there is called Hillary. She thought she'd look favourable next to him.

      Boy, did she fuck that one up.

  3. Taking the piss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    C'mon, I thought it was common knowledge that the whole "movement" is a giant troll-job aimed at getting just this kind of hand-wringing attention.

  4. Re:Been around for centuries, will be around for m by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd say that anytime there is a duality of opinion, no matter how much evidence there is, you'll always find people on both sides.

    Because otherwise there wouldn't be a duality of opinion?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  5. Re:Flat earth for the in crowd: by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't make conclusions until they are done with their jobs.

    I like how you wrote that 2 sentences after you concluded:

    There is however, clear evidence that Russia tried to influence the US election, and that people in the Trump campaign were involved in that.

  6. flat earthers are dumb, but flouride is toxic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is the by-product of many industries and is toxic. Whatever research this OP is citing (source?) is horribly wrong. The CDC even acknowledges it is toxic. $5 says my comment gets deleted. Slashdot used to be full of smart people, what happened? Oh, a large news company bought it...

    1. Re: flat earthers are dumb, but flouride is toxic by darkharlequin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      --
      i am so very tired....
    2. Re:flat earthers are dumb, but flouride is toxic by Kabukiwookie · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Slashdot used to be full of smart people, what happened?

      People have been drinking too much tap water all their lives. Their brain development may be hampered, but their teeth are shiny white.

      http://www.fluoridation.com/c-... From the link:

      "Only about 5% of the world population is fluoridated and more than 50% of these people live in North America.

      That may sort of explains the political mess in the US then doesn't it. In most of western Europe, fluoride in water is banned; because they *do* actually read the research, such as the link that darkharlequin posted and don't just parrot others blindly.

      --
      The mountains of madness have many little plateaus of sanity - Terry Pratchett.
  7. Sigh. by ledow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Could we please stop celebrating and tolerating ignorance?

    Thanks.

    P.S. Just... literally... get a boat. Pick a direction - any direction. And keep going. Whether or not the Earth is flat will be proven within less than 80 days (and that was a long time ago, you can do it much quicker now).

    If something's flat, it either has an edge, or it's infinite. You'll find out, to within a certain margin or error, in a couple of months of travelling, and have some great experiences along the way.

    Either you'll never see the same place twice, or you'll fall off an end. Note: If you come back where you started, you're crap at navigation or the Earth is round. Both of which give you a pretty big hint that you shouldn't be formulating flat-Earth theories.

    Or are we honestly claiming an infinitely long and wide self-repeating tiled plane?

  8. Re:Been around for centuries, will be around for m by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My point isn't that they're right, but they have an idea.

    It's an idea which has been disproven. That makes clinging to it dumb.

    So let's ALL make some predictions and observations and see what works. [...] Spontaneous generation might still be proven right,

    Yeah, if your experiment was dumb enough. That's the problem with listening to EVERYONE. Some people you clearly don't listen to about anything.

    There is an internet philosophy that has people bringing up disproven or dipshit theories, and screaming that other people have to disprove them. A really warped idea if "If you don't disprove me to my satisfaction, you prove that I am right!"

    Well, I suppose these modern day Neanderthals paid zero attention in science class, but I remember ancient concepts like spontaneous generation and flat earth being discussed in class, and unless a person wasn't capable of critical thinking, they would catch on real early and quickly that the earth was spherical, and that animals don't pop out of nowhere. Note yes - we now know that the earth was an oblate spheroid and a little chunky at the center.

    The biggest problem with the idea that we must exhaustively explain every debunked idea over and overandoverandover again for people who have exactly no intention of taking the telling is that we'll be stuck forever explaining things like say, the phlogiston theory, when in fact we've moved so far beyond that that it would be a waste of time. Read it in a book, and move on.

    Especially in the age of the internet, a skeptic could set up an experiment with say 50 others of like mind across the globe. Do the old Erastothenes experiment but around a meridian line describing a circle.

    But who am I fooling.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  9. +1 Informative, really? by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It was never Christian land in the first place. The first crusade was to aid the Byzantines who had lost lands to the Turks. Christian Franks recaptured the land and didn't return it

    What religion were the Byzantines?

    Since I actually have a clue what I'm talking about, I'll give you a hint: not Buddhists.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."