Slashdot Mirror


Russia Demands Apple Remove Telegram From Russian App Store (macrumors.com)

The Russian government is asking Apple to help it block Telegram by removing it from the country's App Store. Mac Rumors reports: A Russian court in April ordered carriers and internet providers in the country to block Telegram back in April, after Telegram refused to provide Russia with backdoor access to user messages. Despite issuing the block order back in April, Russia has only been able to disrupt Telegram's operations in the country by 15 to 30 percent. Given the government's inability to block the app, Roskomnadzor, the division of the government that controls media and telecommunications, has demanded that Apple remove the Telegram app from the Russian App Store. The group first asked Apple to remove the app in April, but is appealing to Apple again.

"In order to avoid possible action by Roskomnadzor for violations of the functioning of the above-mentioned Apple Inc. service, we ask you to inform us as soon as possible about your company's further actions to resolve the problematic issue," the regulator wrote. Roskomnadzor has given Apple one month to remove the Telegram app from the App Store. Roskomnadzor's director Alexander Zharov said he did not want to "forecast further actions" should Apple not comply with the request following the 30 day period.

113 comments

  1. Re: BeauHD by comparison will die from Anal Warts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hillary For Prison!

  2. Can't forecast because they can't do shit by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Didn't want to forecast further actions" - because what are they going to do, block the Apple app store in Russia? That would punish Russia as much as it punishes Apple (modulo what the haters think).

    1. Re:Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll use it as an excuse to uber-MITM all Apple.ru traffic on a TLD level, and Trump will thank them for fucking America in the ass and oh by the way how's Vlad doing?

    2. Re: Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, Apple is already thinking of ways to grovel to the Kremlin.

      They would sell out their own mothers for five bucks more from today's pizza sales.

    3. Re:Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can fine them, block them from the market, sieze assets etc etc. saying they can't do anything is ignorance considering Apple has a considerable footprint in Russia.

    4. Re:Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can fine them, block them from the market, sieze assets etc etc. saying they can't do anything is ignorance considering Apple has a considerable footprint in Russia.

      It will be interesting to see what they do. I tend to say Apple should do nothing, beyond protecting their people and long term they can just get out of Russia, if that is the only choice. Presumably android has a similar application. Hopefully they will stand together.

      While I understand people do bad things with encryption and such, I figure the good outweighs the bad.

      Of course if congressmen are using apps that don't record a permanent record for public records, then they should be impeached and jailed, preferably for a long time. With that much power comes additional responsibility and oversight. No exceptions.

      If strict requirements on provable auditable record keeping was in place for Hillary then she wouldn't have dared use her own server, particularly if jail time was part of them. I say put those requirements in place with laws that have teeth. No exceptions, including for the president.

      For that matter, I think we need to start recording all calls from higher level officials and members of congress. We can setup the appropriate oversight so that it is not abused and legitimately private conversations aren't released. Let it be a public record like anything else.

      If we have to create a panopticon for our government to reduce corruption then we should seriously consider it.

    5. Re:Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple supports Trump so hard so they would never block Russia.

    6. Re:Can't forecast because they can't do shit by phayes · · Score: 2

      What makes you think that the Russian authorities are incapable of imposing increasing fines on Apple for every day the apps they want to ban are still in the Russian App store?

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    7. Re: Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes please. The more power and wealth you have, the less privacy you get. Of course this would also require a relaxation of the moral and religious standards. I have little hope either will occur.

    8. Re: Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly!! apple all ready bends over and spreads for China.

    9. Re: Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think Apple is incapable of blatantly ignoring these bullshit fines and continue business as usual?

    10. Re:Can't forecast because they can't do shit by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's a whole bunch of things they could do that does not involve blocking the app store. Fines and the possible arrest of Russian Apple employees would be next. They have a recent history of murdering businessmen they don't like - even outside of Russia - and on a less dramatic level abusing Interpol warrants and otherwise harassing and causing a nuisance for people outside of their jurisdiction.

      This is a country unbound by the constraints of following the law. Which is one of the major reasons why there's concern about the level of influence it has with the current government and why, for example, Mitt Romney in 2012 ran in part on a campaign expressing concern that the Obama administration wasn't taking it seriously.

      Blocking the Apple store? It doesn't need to.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    11. Re:Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should provide a backdoored version especially for the Russian market, and the non-backdoored version elsewhere.

      That way, phones used by Russian government will have the backdoor - and with Apple having the key, Russian authorities won't be the only ones capable of listening in.

      Russians who really want a non-backdoored app can jump through some hoops to install a non-Russian version.

    12. Re:Can't forecast because they can't do shit by arth1 · · Score: 1

      This is a country unbound by the constraints of following the law.

      Yes, it is.
      And so is Russia.

    13. Re: Can't forecast because they can't do shit by reanjr · · Score: 1

      That's quite brilliant.

    14. Re:Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What impact do you think that'll realistically have on Apple though? They only make about $100 million a year in Russia, out of $4835 million global profits. So what, their profit drops to $4735 for the year they're kicked out of Russia? you think that's really enough for them to give the slightest shit? There's still plenty of growth to be had in South America and Asia instead.

      Meanwhile Apple pulls out of Russia, and Russians continue buying their devices from overseas and continue using telegram.

      So sure, Russia can theoretically fine them, but Apple will give very little of a shit, and Russia's authoritarian leadership still wont be able to solve their problem of being able to spy on their citizens so that they can use murder and violence to suppress dissent as usual. There's every chance Apple backing that kind of regime and things like state sponsored assassinations by kowtowing to the Russian government will cost it far more in reputational damage in the rest of the world than standing up to them, or pulling out would.

    15. Re:Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      This is the best example of how Government regulations are tyranny. Not because they do use it tyrannical fashion, but that they always have that as a unspoken threat, "Do as we say or else!"

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    16. Re:Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think that the Russian authorities are incapable of imposing increasing fines on Apple for every day the apps they want to ban are still in the Russian App store?

      Guessing 1) Young. 2) Liberal

      I doubt Russia really cares that much about Telegram so much as they are testing to see who comes out in defense of it and more importantly, how. Eventually tech companies will have no choice but to leave since compliance is not an option, at which point Russia still won't care becuse the infrastrucutre has already been created.

      It's worth pointing out Russia is far from the only country who engages in this kind of political masturbation. I believe kids call these "wedge issues" now.

    17. Re:Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Green+Mountain+Bot · · Score: 1

      Just like when an employer asks you to do something, there's an unspoken threat.

      The bottom line is that the fundamental rule of nature is might makes right. We can either band together and form a government to be the mightiest, or we can leave a vacuum to be filled by warlords and oligarchs. The libertarian ideal of just settling every dispute in a neutral court still depends on the implicit threat that the loser must abide by the decision or else. There simply is no way to eliminate that type of "tyranny" without it being replaced by another, usually worse, form of tyranny.

    18. Re:Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      My boss doesn't have the compelling ability to deprive me of liberty, or come at me with guns, and basically ruin my life. Other than that, you're right!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    19. Re:Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is also apples motto too.

    20. Re:Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Green+Mountain+Bot · · Score: 1

      My boss doesn't have the compelling ability to deprive me of liberty, or come at me with guns, and basically ruin my life. Other than that, you're right!

      And who exactly do you think prevents your boss from having that ability if not the government?

      Which is pretty much the point: power abhors a vacuum. Remove the government, and it WILL be replaced by warlords; make it weak, and it WILL be replaced by oligarchs - the historical record consistently bears this out. And neither warlords nor oligarchs give a crap about your liberty, or your life, or your happiness. At least we have a say in government. Good luck taking an oligarch to court, or filing a grievance against a warlord.

    21. Re: Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Demena · · Score: 1

      You say thus despite evidence for the contrary.

    22. Re: Can't forecast because they can't do shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then Apple should withdraw its footprint. Trade across the border only. If Russia then decided to create a Great Wall they will undermine their own ability to connect to the world.

  3. Stoopid by glomph · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nothing stops Rooskis from getting App Store accts in any country they choose. Telegram is my messaging app of choice.

    -ex-Rooski

    1. Re:Stoopid by phayes · · Score: 2

      Nothing is stopping them, other than it's a PITA to switch between app-store accounts & that you cannot change your signed-in appstore account more frequently than every 30 (90?) days.

      I used to use a U.S appleID account without a credit card attached because some free apps I wanted were only on the U.S appstore. Between not being able to switch accounts frequently any more & all the apps I wanted now being in the local appstore I haven't used it in years.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    2. Re:Stoopid by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      Nothing stops Rooskis from getting App Store accts in any country they choose.

      In Putinist Russia, Polonium and Novichok Nerve Agent stops accts in any country they choose.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Stoopid by glomph · · Score: 1

      I just switched between four different countries in under 10 minutes to upgrade local apps. Where did you get this 30/90 number from?

    4. Re:Stoopid by glomph · · Score: 0

      Their top employee here in FreedomLand only drinks Diet Coke.

    5. Re:Stoopid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just one well-placed sniper's bullet stops Putin from issuing any more orders about anything at all.

    6. Re: Stoopid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or for straightforward political assassination, use good old-fashioned bullets.

    7. Re:Stoopid by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Nothing is stopping them, other than it's a PITA to switch between app-store accounts

      Welcome to my world.

    8. Re:Stoopid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing stops Rooskis from getting App Store accts in any country they choose.

      In Putinist Russia, Polonium and Novichok Nerve Agent stops accts in any country they choose.

      The three basic survival rules for free thinkers in Russia: always scan your food with a radiation detector, do not touch a door knob with your bare hands and always keep one eye looking over your shoulder for back shooting Putin loyalists.

    9. Re:Stoopid by phayes · · Score: 1

      https://apple.stackexchange.co...

      The text "You may switch an Associated Device to a different Account only once every 90 days" appears twice in the current iTunes, Mac App, App Store and iBookstore T&C

      It may well not be implemented in such a way that it's a problem but I remember that addition to the T & C around the time I stopped bothering with using two separate AppleIDs.

      Updates with two AppleIDs were a pain anyway because you needed to sign out from one to sign in to the other, & if there were a bunch of updates, they weren't sorted by appleID and you might have to do so more than once (or twice or ...) to get everything updated.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    10. Re:Stoopid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution for Apple is clearly:
      1. Convert all national app stores to app stores corresponding to a particular language or dialect of a language to put them beyond the control of any 1 government.
      2. Let people switch to any App Store they what, whenever they want.
      3. Accept cryptocurrency payments and payments through common middlemen like PayPal, Skrill and Google wallet.
      4. If any government shuts them out of a market, unlock every device in that market so they can sideload any app they want and continue actively selling to people in that country through the "gray market"
      A company isn't necessarily going to win against an oppressive government every time, but they can certainly make sure that oppressive government isn't going to win either.

    11. Re:Stoopid by glomph · · Score: 1

      Wow, someone actually read the click-wrap T & C!

      I agree it's a PITA to change stores, but I occasionally do a [change store/update apps/change store/.....] procedure. Never have been locked out. 99.99% of the time I'm logged in my home-country's store. A handful of apps I use frequently are not available in my home-country store.

    12. Re:Stoopid by phayes · · Score: 1

      You give me much too much credit, lol. I didn't read the T & Cs but when they added that 90 days language to it it _was_ noted and commented on in Apple blogs. I just have a head filled with useless facts...

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  4. Obligatory by Aighearach · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, garden walls you!

    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. As if Russia is more powerful than Apple.

    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus Tim Cook loves Trump so he will never go against Trump.

    3. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As in US of A, walls garden you?

  5. Wierd, it's chicken, but why? by evanh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It doesn't seem their usual approach to be so lenient. It's like they are trying to get Apple to blink first. I would have thought that any warnings would be made very clear behind closed doors.

    So why make the warnings public at all? It must be a popularity problem, as in the wealthy are being told to prepare for no more iPhones.

    Which probably makes the Russian iPhone market quite valuable to Apple also. So I guess it follows that Apple might actually cave on this one. Hence the mind games.

    Can Apple count on enough support to change the government's mind? I doubt it, this is obviously driven straight from the top.

    1. Re:Wierd, it's chicken, but why? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Apple will probably remove the app, but does it really matter? I thought that Apple's messaging service had encryption to prevent snooping. Maybe the government doesn't care if they can still find out who you're messaging, but I don't think this is going to stop the people who are really serious about their privacy.

      On the other hand, maybe Apple doesn't care either. I don't know what their market share looks like in Russia, but I'd imagine it to be lower than most other countries. Apple might care when it's China come knocking since they need to manufacture their phones their, but if Russia just outright bans them they might not lose all that much.

      However, no company refuses revenue no matter how small and Apple is glad to sell you $20 accessories that probably cost them a quarter to manufacture so I can't see them turning down even what little pittance the Russian market might represent. However, stonewalling for a while might make them look tough and concerned about privacy, which might make them more marketable.

    2. Re:Wierd, it's chicken, but why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I thought that Apple's messaging service had encryption to prevent snooping.

      LOL. It is true that imessage is encrypted, but it uses a weak 1024-bit certificate, which is pretty small, and Apple can also MITM the messages if they wanted to.

      https://blog.quarkslab.com/ime...

    3. Re:Wierd, it's chicken, but why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back around 2010, there was a company in Hongkong founded by two Russian students. They had business of making PVD gold plated panels ifones. Ridiculously successful they were. While they were selling panels for few hundred bucks, the whole phones they sold were valued at over $4k, and they had no shortage of clients from Russia.

      In less than a year, they were swarmed by Chinese copies though.

    4. Re:Wierd, it's chicken, but why? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The Why is the easy part to understand.
      When the CIA, MI6, GCHQ and NSA want to do things in Russia they need a communications system that is ubiquitous and pro Western.
      The game plan for Russia is another Colour revolution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... .
      That allows all the Western and NATO backed "charity" and "NGO" civil society groups to plan nation wide protests within Russia.

      So why make the warnings public at all?
      Russia understands PRISM and how other US networks and brands can be used to track all Russian users in any nation for NSA use.
      The lack of public warnings in the US/UK is for a different reason. The FBI, MI6/5, GCHQ and DEA are winning with PRISM like tracking all over the USA, Ireland and many other nations.

      The West needs junk crypto and collect it all networks that are productive for law enforcement.
      Russia is more aware of the junk crypto and is tired of western brands setting up global networks as the consumer gateway for GCHQ, NSA deep into Russia.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Wierd, it's chicken, but why? by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Apple will MITM any app and when the US is on their doorstep with a national security letter.

    6. Re:Wierd, it's chicken, but why? by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Well, Apple has sales in Russia of around $2Bn. per year, at a very good profit margin. OK, this hardly peanuts, but not a lot of money to Apple really.
      (Fun fact: Apple's market cap is the same as the entire Russian market...)

      Before they set up their own subsidiary, Apple products were purchased overseas and "greyed" into Russia by enterprising individuals, so if Apple's subsidiary gets shut down, presumably that would re-start, so Apple wins anyway...

    7. Re:Wierd, it's chicken, but why? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Why ask why? :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  6. And P.S: by evanh · · Score: 1

    I note this action has probably been held off until after the recent elections.

    1. Re:And P.S: by KiloByte · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      And elections matter in Russa, why? The results are known months before the vote.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:And P.S: by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Elections matter in Russia because they are contested by the technocracy that has taken over. No denying Putin is their man but they are now tens of thousands up there all holding power and influence and it is spreading from Federal government level down to state and country, a definitive shift to a technocracy and elections do count, a least amongst the technocrats, the plebes just vote they way they are taught, by technocrats but it is very much democratic amongst the technocrats and you must perform or you are removed. It seems it will spread, the growth of a multi-polar technocracy, it will be interesting.

      As for banning aps, the Russian government kind of stuck themselves in it from the silly point, trying to control the ap, a mistake, you only ever target the revenue, the ap is meaningless, it could be replaced by a FOSS ap and you have nothing to ban but code, good luck with that. So you simply target the revenue upon an increasing scale, targeting all employees income sources as well as investor returns and of course advertisers served, they'll pay twice for that ad. Target revenue and oh look you have generated a revenue source for government. Ban enough things, quite a revenue stream to tap into.

      To ban an app, you have to charge people with the device who are running that ap, an on the spot fine. Use the ap to identify them, track them to a location with the cell network and at transport choke points, inspect their phone, make them pay a fine and delete the ap or confiscate the phone but to do this would be nuts.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:And P.S: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. People can go buy a burner Android phone and side load Signal or Telegram on it. Its probably the smarter thing to do anyhow.

  7. Reverse doomsday machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow this reminds me of Dr. Strangelove.
    "The whole point of the doomsday machine...is lost if you keep it a secret!"

    Perhaps they only want the public to believe they don't have access to user messages.

    Thou doth protest too much?

  8. Arkadiy Babchenko.Used Telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Arkadiy Babchenko is a Russian journalist who was living in Kiev, Ukraine.

    He was shot a few hours ago at his home, in Kiev Ukraine. Most likely by Russian govt. agents.

    Babchenko used Telegram.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/29/russian-journalist-arkady-babchenko-shot-dead-in-kiev

    1. Re:Arkadiy Babchenko.Used Telegram by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Most likely by Russian govt. agents.

      Whoa. Did they drop their Lubyanka parking receipts in the trashcan or used "russian-only" military grade bullets?

    2. Re:Arkadiy Babchenko.Used Telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Arkadiy Babchenko.Used Telegram by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      He's not dead - see his press conference on the BBC here:

      http://www.bbc.com/news/world-...

  9. is Apple exempt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is Telegram being treated different from Apple? Did Apple provide a back door?

  10. I foresee an increase... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    I foresee an increase in jailbroken iPhones in Russia over the next few months.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    1. Re:I foresee an increase... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I foresee an increase in jailbroken iPhones in Russia over the next few months.

      No need to jailbreak anymore to install "unsanctioned" apps. This has been true since iOS 8.

      XCode can compile and deploy to a device, and if you're on Windows, there are plenty of tools to do so as well.

      Apple however doesn't see it as sideloading - they only approve of this method if you compiled the code yourself. It's why when f.lux tried it Apple had them stop since it wasn't open-source.

    2. Re:I foresee an increase... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      That's beyond the capabilities of most users, though, and I'd honeslty be surprised if more iPhones in Russia aren't jailbroken already.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  11. Android by markdavis · · Score: 1

    How does this do anything for the ~90% using Android (non-Apple) devices? Were they able to get Google to comply too? (And side-loading on Android is built-in).

    1. Re: Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google isnt left wing Nazi like Apple. Samsung even has their own app store, no approval from leftist authorities required. Wish theyd hurry up with Linux on DeX... but anywho, thats real tech news and wouldnt be apropriate for slashdot. lol

    2. Re: Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Google isnt left wing Nazi like Apple.

      That is beside the point. The question is, why is Apple the only distributor being singled out? If the problem is that a program being distributed has deemed illegal to distribute, all distributors should be notified that the product is to be withdrawn. Only requesting this from Apple is a bit like declaring Budweiser beer illegal due to not releasing their ingredients, but then only punishing TGI Friday's for serving it to customers.

    3. Re:Android by jarkus4 · · Score: 1

      "The censorship arm also says that it’s in talks with Google to ban the app from Google Play."
      https://www.theverge.com/2018/...

      As for sideloading: they can simply go after larger repositories (block telegram or we block you). They are unlikely to be able to block small sites (eg blogs), but removing "official" sources is likely to kill more then 99% of app market share in Russia and if they really care they can go after users then.

    4. Re: Android by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      You go after a big blatant target. A hen that will squaw and squaw as it is slaughtered. The other adversarys will watch and afterwards quietly comply. Apple's hype network is a perfect propaganda organ for the Russian authorities to make use of. And a whole community of people within Russia of over average wealth is a most excellent group for the authorities to loudly bring to heel.

  12. This will evidence further how much Apple sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple is one of those companies you'd be stupid to block (politically). Actually I think it would be smart for Apple to be blocked for other reasons, but mainly because they are a threat to Russia's independence and security. Not so much because of this though. Russia should be demanding source code be release for any company wanting to sell products in its country. And that should really be the rule everywhere.

  13. Blows Kaspersky's argument by guygo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This does a lot to blow Kaspersky's claim to be completely independent of the Russian government out of the water. If their Bureau of Information Control is going to try to control Apple - a company that exists well outside the Putin sphere of influence - why wouldn't they demand the same control of software installed on millions of computers worldwide? It's more and more obvious that Kaspersky did bow down and kiss Putin's ring long ago. Gee, what's next? We find out that the Chinese Bureau of Information Control really does have backdoors in ZTE and Huwei gear? What a surprise.

    1. Re: Blows Kaspersky's argument by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      It certainly makes the Russian cyber-security firms look just as beholden to their national governments as the US firms are to theirs.

      Which presents a good reason for individuals to choose the cyber-security tools not based in their own country. Kapersky is the right choice for Americans, just as Symantec might be for a Russian.

    2. Re:Blows Kaspersky's argument by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It does nothing of the sort. Making a public request to a company to remove a 3rd party product is not the same as forcing a company to include malware. By your definition there is no independent software not locally made or anywhere else made since you think that any government asking anything of any one without actually seeing the outcome automatically makes it non-independent.

    3. Re:Blows Kaspersky's argument by guygo · · Score: 1

      Looks like the IRA Kaspersky fanboys are still working overtime.

  14. Statistics by gavron · · Score: 1

    When you say "Russia has only been able to disrupt Telegram's operations in the country by 15 to 30 percent." the numbers in there are off by 100%. That makes it difficult, at the very least, to identify how accurate the numbers were.

    For example, when the polls say "Trump is loved by 50% of the people. Poll has a margin of error of 4.6%." we know that somewhere between roughly 45% and 55% of the people love him and vice versa. It is vital to quantify the value of the numbers.

    Being told "by 15 to 30 percent" means we have a margin of error as big as our initial data. In both directions that means 0-30%. If something is 0-30% disruptive it's impossible to tell how disruptive it is... if at all.

    If the news media continues to allow organizations to give it wildly-varying ranges, that's fine, but don't publish them. The disservice to us (the readers) is obvious. Sure, we read the article. Sure, we think this could be disruptive. Up to 30%. Or not at all. Maybe just half of that...

    E

    1. Re:Statistics by Strider- · · Score: 2

      well, no, it could be 22.5% +/- 7.5%

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    2. Re:Statistics by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you really understand statistics, but you definitely don't really understand English. 15 to 30 percent means a minimum of 15% and a maximum of 30%. While I am sure both ends are guesstimates, the principle is the same.

      Think of it as an advertisement for a sale. When the ad reads "15-30% off!", it simply means that each individual item is discounted by some percentage between 15 and 30. It's not trying to imply a margin of error.

  15. The inevitable result of a walled garden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The inevitable result of a walled garden is that you, the maintainer, are held responsible for the actions of the apps, people, and data within that garden. Any country can pass a law that makes this very bad for you. This is a very real problem with walled gardens and non-open hardware, though I imagine it will take quite awhile before this plays out enough for most people to even notice it as an issue.

    1. Re: The inevitable result of a walled garden by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      'Most people' are the sheep within the fence and don't need to notice.

  16. Re: Wired, it's chicken, but why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is either of those the reason Roskomnadzor hasn't blocked it, because they already have access? Do Apple publish any info about requests for data access in Russia?

  17. Apple say no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reply. No. Simple enough. Likely Apple's business in Russia is small compared to their global net. So tell them to fuck off.

  18. telegram dodging the blocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The countermeasures against the blocking have been interesting.

    Telegram got lots of servers so the Russians blocks milions of ip addresses. Iran also began trying to block telegram.

    People in the west started helping by running socks5 proxies. Some of the proxies that people put up allowed all traffic, not just telegram, so they got used for forum spamming, torrents etc and got shut down after a day or two when the companies that the servers were rented from got lots of complaints.
    There is a socks5 proxy written in python that is set up to only connect to telegram ip addresses.

    Now it is reported that deep packet inspection is being used in some countries to detect socks5 protocol.

    Telegram has created a new proxy protocol called MTPROTO to try to get around that. The android and iphone versions of telegram messenger can use MTPROTO but the desktop software can't, it's only in the beta versions that are not available to everyone. Voice calls currently don't work with an MPROTO proxy.

    There are now several different bits of MPROTO server software on github in python, golang and javascript.

    There are various telegram bots and twitter accounts listing proxy ip addresses.

    http://www.techort.com/telegram-mtproto-proxy-everything-we-know-about-him-habr/

    1. Re:telegram dodging the blocks by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How many are just traps for spies?
      Look at how to get around a nations powerful internet controls for "free".
      With a free super wide encrypted internet connection connection 24/7. Free and safe. Good strong crypto.
      Look up a free list and its 100% free and working.
      Security officials try each service and get detected by NSA, GCHQ?
      CIA and MI6 want lists of dissidents to track internal political changes?
      Who is going to get real time stats on that user wanting to get around their nations security services?
      Free countermeasures are often well funded honey pots.

      Look at how China has totally worked around any such outside crypto efforts. Use a powerful "working" VPN in China and that connection has to be approved.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:telegram dodging the blocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how you ignore anything Russia has ever done instead going straight for the US and China like a good conspiracy theorist

  19. Xcode too? by seoras · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since Telegram is open source and you can get both it and Xcode for free then removing it from the App store doesn't really prevent it from being used on legit, un-jail broken, iOS devices.
    Yes, yes, I know you won't get APNS, and if you can't sign it with a developer account, it needs reloading every week.
    But it's a by-pass none the less.
    Anyone with anything to hide will no doubt find a way around Apple's compliance with the country's legal requirements and in this case it's relatively easy.
    My question is how far with Russia go to stamp out encrypted messaging? Can they? Can anyone?

    1. Re:Xcode too? by sanf780 · · Score: 1

      As far as I am told, the client source code has been shared, the server is not. I am not sure if it is open source or not.

    2. Re:Xcode too? by yarbo · · Score: 1

      Making it take significantly more work will greatly reduce its adoption, which is nearly as good as eliminating it entirely. Do you suppose even 1 out of 100 users would do that much work?

    3. Re:Xcode too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Anyone with anything to hide will no doubt find a way around Apple's compliance with the country's legal requirements and in this case it's relatively easy.

      Anyone with anything to hide won't be using Telegram...

  20. Popularity by evanh · · Score: 2

    It's not a win or lose calculation, it's about maintaining strong popularity. Avoiding a campaign that could have included taking away more sparkly things would be worth the wait.

    Keep privacy concerns firmly in the helpless camp, will be the attitude.

  21. Follow the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously Appleâ(TM)s reaction should be to consider Russian laws.... if the law say you must follow the order... then follow it. If the Russian law doesnâ(TM)t explicitly say it is binding then fuck it.... donâ(TM)t follow.

    Just like how they need to follow US law if it is binding but if itâ(TM)s just some request from a government agency that has no legal standing then fuck it.

    If the US law say you canâ(TM)t follow other countries law (e.g. like how sanctions work) then you have to decide if you want to operate in US or Russia. If US citizens want to stop Apple they have to vote in someone who will sanction Russia for violating our standards of human rights. If not.... and there is no law... then fuck off.

  22. Citation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..Required. Seriously, please post relevant links.

  23. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the Russian Taxman along with 125 guys in uniforms and Kalashnikovs show up at Apple Moscow, they cannot do "business as usual".

    Maybe even the FSB shows up, because the whole Telegram thing is apparently a National Security Thing for Russia. They will bring 3x125 guys with Kalashnikovs.

    1. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Apple even have nexus in Russia?

    2. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullying some retail employees isn't going to accomplish much. Russia's a minor percentage of Apple's revenue. I'm sure Putin sending in guys with machine-guns and chasing Apple from the country will further endear the Russian populace to him, not.
      Gangsterism only works for so long.

    3. Re:Well by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      The Russian people see what Putin want...

      Oh, I get what this whole thread is about.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  24. Cool Down Lockheed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We know you paid top dollar for Hillary and we know your sale was not successful. Get over it.

    1. Re:Cool Down Lockheed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody's over Hillary except for you Trumpers, it seems. Without an enemy, you're nothing.

  25. Try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then see what the GRU can do to the guy who ordered this. Anywhere, any time, including Israel.

    1. Re: Try by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      What they can do to the guy that orders it, without Putin suffering a scratch.

      Really, the whole world's stability, for better or worse, depends on the acts of terrorists against world leaders being thwarted.

  26. Be a Realist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Russia has been running a quite shrewd strategy of cooperation with ALL international players, including Apple for the last 15 years or so.

    It has been highly successful, making Russians much better off than they were under the drunkard Jelzin.

    Russia is by now the largest exporter of grain, a major player in advanced weapons and materials such as Titanium.

    Of course they do not have the breadth and depth of industry as the soviet union had, but they have successfully jump-started quite a few sectors of their economy. Food production certainly is much better than during soviet times. Russia is a major supplier of software and other engineering services to the rest of the world. Probably Apple is a major customer, too.

    Why risk that successful strategy by making unreasonable demands against powerful players such as Apple ? Successful negotiators don't overplay their hand. They want good deals, not a paradise.

    The Russian government knows full well that the demands of national security must not suffocate the economy. Full security in a country which is an economic graveyard makes no sense. So they politely ask Apple to help them with their national security issue. Telegram has apparently been used in terror attacks and they cannot read the messages. Unlike NSA, it must be said.

  27. Please, read properly by franzrogar · · Score: 2

    Russia wants to BAN ONLY Telegram because they DIDN'T COMPLY with a BACKDOOR.

    So... does that mean that Facebook Messenger, WhatsAppp, etc. HAVE PROVIDED ONE to Russia?

  28. Only affects new and re-installations by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

    Problem is, banning the app doesn't remove the app from user's phones. Apple hasn't even demonstrated they can do that - they can potentially disable apps that use location APIs, but that's it.

    So banning it just means new users can't install the app, or reinstall the app if they delete it. Existing app works just fine.

    And new users can always use the well-documented way to side load the app onto their phones... something easy to do since Telegram is open-source.

    1. Re:Only affects new and re-installations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they can remove apps from user's phones. https://www.macrumors.com/2008...
      And if you do not believe in this, then consider that they can always send a deletion order in the next iOS update.

  29. They should spoof 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Telegram and other companies that gets asked to create back-doors for police should say "Sure!" and then give the police access to a special version of their admin software that makes it appear as though the user is going into people's accounts and viewing their messages, but in actuality the "messages" they see are just randomly generated, innocuous notes about mundane things (kitten GIFs, unicorn memes, fart jokes, etc).

  30. Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I would expand this to -all- companies, and -all- countries. Would someone trust their tanks on a battlefield to run on an engine that nobody hows how it works, be it the cylinders in it, the type of setup, compression ratio, etc.? Nope. But that is what is done with software.

    China does this. Microsoft, Apple, and other companies hand them over their source code because it is either that, or being banned from the Chinese market. This might be the wise thing for -any- country's national security, if only to prevent hidden logic bombs and Trojans, and to ensure code in critical use can be patched without trying to hunt down the vendor or reverse-engineer it.

    This can be done. The only real thing on the Internet that can't be duplicated by open source is Active Directory and GPOs, because there just isn't any other solutions that have the ability to scale as much as AD. Exchange comes to mind as well.

  31. On the last day, Apple will remove it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    On the last day, Apple will fold, just like they did in China.
    Russia is a big market.

    It is Apple's only real play. They owe it to the stockholders.

  32. Telegram? What is that? by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    Another body that is going to learn, the hard way, about the Streisand Effect. Bunch of morons.

  33. Bingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You get an A grade for proper logical reasoning.

  34. Which is it Beau? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the Russians asking, or are they demanding?

  35. No Apple Stores in Russia by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell from a quick web search, there are *no* Apple Stores located in Russia, never have been. I don't know if Apple has any employees in Russia at all. Iphones are available, but they're sold through local retail outlets.

    If Apple has any guts they will say: look, this is the product we made, it is designed to run apps like Telegram-- if you don't like our product, you can just make it illegal to sell them in your country. The result would be this: a billion or two in lost sales (if that), and one of the greatest public-relations triumphs in the history of public relations. If they do it with any panache, they could easily make the front page of the New York Times with this story.