Slashdot Mirror


5 Years on, US Government Still Counting Snowden Leak Costs (apnews.com)

National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden blew the lid off U.S. government surveillance methods five years ago, but intelligence chiefs complain that revelations from the trove of classified documents he disclosed are still trickling out. From a report: That includes recent reporting on a mass surveillance program run by close U.S. ally Japan and on how the NSA targeted bitcoin users to gather intelligence to combat narcotics and money laundering. The Intercept, an investigative publication with access to Snowden documents, published stories on both subjects. The top U.S. counterintelligence official said journalists have released only about 1 percent taken by the 34-year-old American, now living in exile in Russia, "so we don't see this issue ending anytime soon." "This past year, we had more international, Snowden-related documents and breaches than ever," Bill Evanina, who directs the National Counterintelligence and Security Center, said at a recent conference. "Since 2013, when Snowden left, there have been thousands of articles around the world with really sensitive stuff that's been leaked."

172 comments

  1. Ah the days of misplaced idealism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I miss the days where the biggest threats were misguided idealists instead of stone cold traitors Like Donald Trump and his enablers in the republican party.

    1. Re:Ah the days of misplaced idealism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very much seconded. Trump went into the fray just to cover up on the giant Ponzi scheme he had mounted before and which was threatening to explode in its face.

      Americans, you've been betrayed!

    2. Re:Ah the days of misplaced idealism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still not quite tired of your tears.

    3. Re:Ah the days of misplaced idealism... by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      Well, I've really been missing the obsessions of the birthers.

      Glad to see that, with the change in administrations, the other team has unleashed its own obsessives.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  2. Horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    And yet they don't seem to care about the $2,300,000,000,000.00 that went missing the day before 9/11

    Snowden is a convenient smokescreen to keep you distracted from the real outright theft of your illegally garnished federal income tax.

    1. Re:Horseshit by ponraul · · Score: 0

      Mod this up plz.

    2. Re:Horseshit by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      $2.3 trillion? Your mom spent that on condoms last year alone!

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    3. Re:Horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you see the videos of that red hot molten metal pouring out of the bulding, and the audio of the explosive charges, and people ordering the third building down... yeah, that.

      Of course the planes and hijackers were real.
      Also real was that their plot WAS fully known to the ABOVE TOP SECRET US Govt, and they prepped the buildings in the days before and then just sat back and LET IT CONVENIENTLY HAPPEN.

      Folks, Jet Fuel burns itself up very quickly and isn't hot enough to make metal pour red hot outside and down the buildings and in the basements.
      Blowtorch like steel cutting methods do.

      Bin Laden's plan was a classic GIFT to the US Govt that wanted since the 90's upstart of the resto fo the world to jumpstart global domination destabilization and war.

      And you let that fucknut Bush and every President and Govt since then get away with it.

      Fools!!!

    4. Re:Horseshit by butchersong · · Score: 2

      It is claimed that this is largely a myth and debunked. It is though I will admit... strange that the day after Rumsfeld complains about the not properly tracked money...
      """The technology revolution has transformed organizations across the private sector, but not ours, not fully, not yet. We are, as they say, tangled in our anchor chain. Our financial systems are decades old. According to some estimates, we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions. We cannot share information from floor to floor in this building because it's stored on dozens of technological systems that are inaccessible or incompatible. Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld. Monday September 10th, 2001"""

    5. Re: Horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the money. Who lost and who won. The USA lost, Iraq lost, Afganistan lost. However China won big time. The USA has been involved in an endless war on so called terror, while China has been building up their economy and financing this farcical war. Is it possible that China had some involvement?

      Just saying. There is more energy in a pound of jet fuel than C4. Whoever planned the operation was brilliant. I don't know who it was, but I'm unwilling to accept the official story. It might have been 12 Saudi terrorist, but it could have been anyone of half a dozen other groups with the resources to run a false flag operation. I just can not accept the story perpetuated by the media elite as the gospel. The media today is not the bastion of journalistic integrity. They will latch on to the easiest explanation availible. They are saying they found the remnants of the passports that survived the blazing hot jet fuel inferno that collapsed the trade centers. That may be true, or it may not be true. I will never know... I do know who won and who lost though.

    6. Re: Horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off back to Russia.

    7. Re: Horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is falling for your divisive propaganda. Get the fuck off Slashdot and go back to Bebo.

    8. Re:Horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly, the attack on the Pentagon the next day killed many of the accountants tasked with finding the missing money.

      The pentagon comptroller was Rabbia Dov Zakheim, a dual American-Israeli citizen. In 2004, the Pentagon lost another $1 trillion dollars on Zakheim's watch.

      What a coincidence!

    9. Re: Horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyways it's mainstream news that the FBI was warned weeks in advance. The FBI confirmed it themselves. And no I'm not going to dig up 17 year old news stories for you.

    10. Re: Horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the buildings fell where did all that potential energy go? Some went into sound, but there was a much larger heat source available than jet fuel.

  3. Good by TimMD909 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm happy to hear they're still facing consequences, even if those consequences aren't nearly severe enough to make me content.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised Trump hasn't pardoned Snowden, yet. You know, considering that Republicans love the 4th amendment, and don't like the government illegally searching through their personal shit and all.

    2. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He should be rotting in a jail sell right now.

      Yes the NSA chief should be in jail, along with many other criminals in the NSA.
      But do you really thing that will happen?

      Going from your spelling of "cell" I'll assume so, but don't worry, you'll outgrow such naive thoughts when you get out of your teen years.

    3. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised Trump hasn't pardoned Snowden, yet. You know, considering that Republicans love the 4th amendment, and don't like the government illegally searching through their personal shit and all.

      Conservatives love the 4th amendment. Republicans high-five Democrats while they take turns probing your.. information.

    4. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does one "thing" it will happen?

      Please enlighten us, oh Spelling Master.

    5. Re:Good by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Both parties are for snooping on others but not themselves. Politicians are flip-floppers who reflect absent-minded voters.

    6. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Politicians want POWER and CONTROL and TAXATION over you as SLAVES... NOTHING ELSE.
      IT DOES NOT MATTER AT ALL WHICH SIDE DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN.
      They are ALL out to fucking twist you to the maximum they can, and jail and murder you if you resist.
      The SECOND you vote them in office, they COMPLETELY ignore you and do WHATEVER the FUCK they want.

      The only solution is to END GOVERNMENT.
      It is redundant.

    7. Re:Good by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      That's what I call "extreme libertarianism": repeal civilization and go back to "caveman" days, perhaps like Flintstones meet Mad Max. Their convention would be a hoot, that's for sure. I wonder if they piss in the hallway.

    8. Re:Good by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Oh look! Anonymous Coward is trolling itself!

    9. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I find interesting these days...

      You hear almost nothing about the NSA in the media. Almost like a blackout.

      I guess a highly controversial president, is a nice distraction from US domestic intelligence activities.

    10. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/sell/cell

      fixed it so your super brain powers could comprehend.

    11. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I call "extreme libertarianism": repeal civilization and go back to "caveman" days, perhaps like Flintstones meet Mad Max.

      Everybody else just calls it nihilism.

    12. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your freedom is a cost to someone else?

      How can I bill you?

    13. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Edward Snowden is a true patriot!

    14. Re:Good by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      By "they" you mean tax payers?

    15. Re:Good by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you might almost think the NSA was a secret government organization that has existed since WWI and which the U.S. government actually hid the existence of for over fifty years.

  4. And 200+ years on by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    in the history of the United States and Cop Math is still a thing.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  5. Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The government isn't really doing anything to prevent a Snowden 2.0 either. They're still after prosecuting him, which means the next Snowden will also flee overseas and leak to the media. There isn't really a "legal" way for someone like Snowden to report government abuses; the only alternative is through the media.

    I've not seen the government make any steps to prevent the next Snowden from following the same steps Snowden made.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I imagine Trump will take a hint from his good friend Putin and Snowden will mysteriously succumb to Polonium or Novichok.

      Doubtful. Trump may be Putin's bitch but it doesn't work the other way round. The longer Snowden stays in Russia, the better the message for anyone who might in future think about trusting Russia. Hell, Putin has gone to war in Syria, admittedly partly for a military port, but mostly because he wants to show that if you stick with Russia then Russia sticks with you. Compare with Ukraine, Georgia, or Germany who have stuck with America. Compare with Japan's treatment over North Korea. Compare with the various muslims who cosied up to the states during the Iraq war and can't now get visas. Compare with the shit we Brits are going to get over post Brexit trade.

      Thinking of a recently started Trade war, which countries and people can you think of that might get the message that Russia keeps its promises? Which countries and people do you think people like Assad and Snowden speak to?

    2. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      When you find out your government has dozens if not 100s of illegal operations running, and you realize that everyone above you is involved, what exactly are you meant to do?

    3. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      > He made no complaints or reports of abuses or improper behavior by his agency.

      Because he already saw what happened to the insiders before him who attempted to do as much.

      > Snowden was not a whistleblower. He was an "information wants to be free!" anti-government attention-whore, and rotting in Russia is better than he deserves for his acts.

      Tell us how you really feel, Mr. Clapper...

    4. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Absolutely incorrect.
      There are multiple chains of authority that someone in the IC can report to if they discovery improper behavior. Local office, agency IG, other agency IGs, the IC IG, even the Congressional Oversight Committees.

      Sure. You could even report the improper behaviour to the guy who's doing it. Or to President Trump himself. The effect will be the same in every case however. You will suffer more than the person you are reporting. Sometimes just a little. Sometimes lots. There have been plenty of cases where people got serious shit for reporting up the chain.

    5. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/22/how-pentagon-punished-nsa-whistleblowers

      Quit lying your ass off and learn how to use Google for fuck's sake

    6. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I just knew you were going to cite the Drake case.

      Thomas Drake reported that he thought there were illegal activities going in. The lawyers reviewed his accusations, and determined that he was wrong - the programs in questions were legal.

      Drake didn't accept that a bunch of lawyers and judges could know more about the law than he did, and so he stole a bunch of classified documents. And you know what? It turns out that all those lawyers were correct in the first place. His concerns were about legal programs that he just didn't like.

      Drake was not a whistleblower. He was wrong about his facts, and he paid for committing crimes based on his ignorance.

    7. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Narcocide · · Score: 1, Troll

      He cannot possibly claim to be "leaking" with a purpose when he didn't even know what he was revealing.

      But he did claim that it was not his intent to do so. In his version of the story, he's on his way to meet a journalist in Hong Kong (who would have been tasked with responsible disclosure) when his passport is revoked during at a stopover in a Moscow airport, then they leaked all of it. Something he had even anticipated as a possibility, but was forced to accept as a risk to meet with the one journalist he felt he could trust, in the one location that journalist felt safe, within the time frame they had available.

      You certainly knew that, right? Certainly you wouldn't be constantly astroturfing over his version of the story while pretending to know something if you actually didn't know any better, would you?

    8. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Thomas Drake reported that he thought there were illegal activities going in. The lawyers reviewed his accusations, and determined that he was wrong - the programs in questions were legal.

      It's rather telling that your primary concern is whether something was "legal" rather than being, you know, right.

      (Torture and execution without due process are only two examples of things that are perfectly hunky-dory if all you care about is legality.)

      > Drake was not a whistleblower. He was wrong about his facts, and he paid for committing crimes based on his ignorance.

      Keep looking for that true Scotsman, Mr. Clapper.

    9. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Really?
      Cite the people that have been punished for reporting illegal spying through channels, please. Since there are plenty of cases, you will have no trouble coming up with three.

      Here are your three whistle-blowers who have been punished for whistleblowing according to the correct procecures. In fact, just in case you question the criteria, I'll throw in a few bonus ones.

      1. Thomas Drake (one - fired and arrested)
      2. John Crane (two - actually responsible for whistleblowers)
      3. James S. Pars (CIA)
      4. Bill Binney (bonus one)
      5. Diane Roark (bonus two)

      On the other hand, I *have* reported improper behavior, and watched the violator be punished. In one cases, even go to jail.

      You will notice that the above list of whistleblowers are public knowledge. If you are an insider then you should know more than me. I really question how you can seem to think I wouldn't be able to come up with three

      The IC takes the rules seriously... abusing them WILL get you in trouble.

      I think you are confusing "the rules", as in what they have decided they will do, where I would say that for the most part they are taken very seriously, with "the law", as in what they are actually allowed to do, which they will bend endlessly. If you were reporting a place where the rules were breaching the law or you were reporting a person for breaching the law when they were following orders then I think you would have found plenty more difficulty than the situation of reporting an individual for a violation of the rules.

      Also, you seem to have forgotten already, but Snowden was during the Obama administration. Trump has nothing to do with him.

      My point was in the context of a discussion about Snowden 2.0 which will, likely, happen under Trump. In any case Obama was at least as rabid as Trump in pursuing whistleblowers. Probably more so because he actually had the ability to keep a thought in his head for more than five minutes.

    10. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Shocking. The government people doing clearly immoral and probably illegal things claim the illegal things they were doing as legal and when pressured on the matter threw the book at the person who brought it up.

      Your face couldn't be more smeared with bootpolish if you tried.

    11. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Patently false; quite a few former FBI/CIA directors over the last few years have said as much. "There is nowhere for whistlblowers to go".

      When the US Government starts behaving properly, THEN we can start to have a conversation about ethics...until then, if they're playing dirty pool they must accept others playing dirty pool with them.

    12. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no "legal" way because government does NOT exist to provide one, EVER.

      Government: To RULE OVER, to CONTROL, to ENSLAVE, to PROGRAM, to TAX and TAKE and GIVE to their FRIENDS and CRONIES, to DICTATE, to CONVICT, JAIL, TORTURE, WAR and MURDER, to COLONIZE, to NEVER YIELD POWER, to be a completely REDUNDANT WASTE.

      THAT is the purpose ALL governments have EVER had WORLDWIDE ever since the DAWN of HISTORY through to THIS VERY DAY..

      NO Government, NO "Democracy" has been, is, or will EVER be ANY different.
      They ALL GO TO SHIT eventually.

      The ONLY solution is NO Government.
      GOVERN YOURSELVES.

      search: Voluntaryism, Libertarian, Anarchism.
      search: Larken Rose

      Think about it for real and LEARN PEOPLE.... LEARN!!!

    13. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, not buying that. But I was illegally surveilled as part of Operation Sun Devil, so my thoughts on "legal channels" are informed by the fact that they didn't work in my case. If I thought it wasn't intentional, I'd maybe buy your story, but I know it wasn't. It's just their MO.

    14. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Even if he didn't like them, which is no matter because the programs were just more government intrusion and control and spying over peoples lives... he has, as do all people, the absolute right to copy and publish and speak freely about whatever the fuck he and you want to. ESPECIALLY when it comes to the government and all the fucked up shit it does.

      If you do not have FREEDOM OF SPEECH, then you have NOTHING.

      Motherfucking baller kudos to ALL leakers.
      They're the real patriots.

    15. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Cap Locks: to be avoided whenever possible, because the readability of your prose will suffer due to abuse of the key.

    16. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      The US gov and mil hired random contractors to watch over each other as the do sensitive tasks.
      Every contractor has a larger file on them covering their education, friends, computer use, politics, movements, new friends, spending.
      The systems to detect personality problems that make a contractor talk to the media are in place.
      Contractors are collected on at work, in other nations while they work for the USA and at back in the USA at home.
      The spending on the buddy system, more contractors and experts will discover any personality with the change in personality that results in the need to talk to the media.
      A lot of work was done to find the how, why and when of media contact.
      Anyone in the media is also watched for new contacts within the US gov, mil.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    17. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > I've not seen the government make any steps to prevent the next Snowden from following the same steps Snowden made.

      My understanding is that Administrators' access has been dramatically cut, and checking out an administrative credential now requires two separate people to accomplish the task.

      If that's right, and I don't work PubSec so I can't say for sure, then you have to find two Snowdens that happen to work together, trust each other enough to work together on the data exfil, and are willing to give up their lives as the price for their actions.

      It's a lot harder to /be/ Snowden.

    18. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First time I've heard that narrative, and I've been following it here on slashdot since it went down.

    19. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody gives a shit about your sneaky little attempt at being a control freak over someone else.
      That poster had awesome insight and suggestions to help you and others become free.
      You just tried to control people and squash good free speech.
      So here are some capital letters for you... FUCK OFF.

    20. Re: Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, nothing in the Snowden leaks was illegal.

      Quite a big part was illegal, including practically everything outside US jurisdiction.

      Second, he didn't just reveal operations that he felt were improper (the "spying on Americans" spin). He also leaked extensive details of the US's spying on foreign nations.

      ...most of which illegal.

      The USA can spy on its own citizens as much as it likes. If the citizens don't like it, they can vote for another government or take steps to make their legal system less of a joke. However, outside US jurisdiction, the US government has no right to violate people's rights.

    21. Re: Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another troll pretending to be American. What does "you lost the election" even supposed to mean? Give up and go back to getting your ass kicked by some Ukrainians.

    22. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      Exactly. All the evil Stalin did was legal as he made it so himself.

    23. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      The US gov and mil hired random contractors to watch over each other as the do sensitive tasks. Every contractor has a larger file on them covering their education, friends, computer use, politics, movements, new friends, spending. The systems to detect personality problems that make a contractor talk to the media are in place. Contractors are collected on at work, in other nations while they work for the USA and at back in the USA at home. The spending on the buddy system, more contractors and experts will discover any personality with the change in personality that results in the need to talk to the media. A lot of work was done to find the how, why and when of media contact. Anyone in the media is also watched for new contacts within the US gov, mil.

      So the cost of doing anything just doubled, one worker to work and a second worker to snoop on the actual worker. That does indeed sound like government. Specifically the paranoid type that fell in the late 80's.

    24. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The idea is that the contractors have new ideas about detecting media contacting traits.
      Lots of new contacts for psychiatrists and psychologists.
      The tracking of spending habits, holidays, web use, reading material.
      Any attempt to complain internally. Any use of the internal legal system to report problems and irregularities.
      The study of anyone with a clearance 4 hops from a person with a clearance who feels the need to report a problem.
      The main thrust is spending habits, hobbies, changes to online searches.
      Staff who discover what they are doing is not legal and know they have no way to report US wide domestic spying to anyone at work.
      The contracts who have studied past media contact by US mil/gov workers with clearances think they have found the first changes that show a later reach out to US media.
      Have an automated system to track such changes over all staff and detection is more easy.

      The buddy system is needed for two reasons.
      The US cannot trust anyone contractor with secret systems anyone due to a lack of background information on any one worker.
      Too may people got hired too quickly for the FBI or FBI like investigations to walk and interview the past of all cleared workers.
      Workers with primal issues, who lied, who cant be trusted, who have a split loyalty to another faith/nation now fill many very sensitive jobs.
      The skill level is also a problem. Too many people got hired with few math/science skills. The US gov/mil was told to hire people and not question merit, skill.
      Not having a loyal background to the USA due to faith, cult, support another nation, politics would not exclude a person from getting a security clearance.
      The US security services had to better reflect communities all over the USA. Security and having any skills would not block that political change to hiring more people from different parts of the USA.
      The buddy system is the last ability to ensure at least one person can be trusted when 2 people are working.
      Two workers provided to do what one worker could do in the past? Thats 100% more profit to a contractor providing services and workers to the US gov/mil.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    25. Re: Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit you are brainwashed and delusional.

      This is why we need to keep leftists out of government. You're batshit insane.

      This coming from someone who probably voted for Donald Trump...

    26. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      First time I've heard that narrative, and I've been following it here on slashdot since it went down.

      Well, you learn something new every day. That has been Snowden's story all along. Not sure how you missed it, since you have been following it since it want down.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    27. Re: Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

      The USA can spy on its own citizens as much as it likes. If the citizens don't like it, they can vote for another government or take steps to make their legal system less of a joke. However, outside US jurisdiction, the US government has no right to violate people's rights.

      You have that exactly backwards. In the US, the 4th Amendment to the Constitution forbids the government from spying on its citizens. I know it happens anyway, but it is illegal. Outside the country, there is nothing in US law that prevents it from spying on other countries.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    28. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

      I just knew you were going to cite the Drake case.

      Thomas Drake reported that he thought there were illegal activities going in. The lawyers reviewed his accusations, and determined that he was wrong - the programs in questions were legal.

      Drake didn't accept that a bunch of lawyers and judges could know more about the law than he did, and so he stole a bunch of classified documents. And you know what? It turns out that all those lawyers were correct in the first place. His concerns were about legal programs that he just didn't like.

      Drake was not a whistleblower. He was wrong about his facts, and he paid for committing crimes based on his ignorance.

      How about William Binney and Russ Tice? Both were retaliated against for reporting illegal activity.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    29. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Agripa · · Score: 2

      Absolutely incorrect.
      There are multiple chains of authority that someone in the IC can report to if they discovery improper behavior. Local office, agency IG, other agency IGs, the IC IG, even the Congressional Oversight Committees.

      Snowden contacted journalists about his upcoming leaks before he even got his job. He made no attempt to contact any of the reporting agencies. He made no complaints or reports of abuses or improper behavior by his agency. He also downloaded ALL the data he could trick people into giving him access to, rather than revealing only those items he thought were criminal.

      Snowden was not a whistleblower. He was an "information wants to be free!" anti-government attention-whore, and rotting in Russia is better than he deserves for his acts.

      Snowden was a contractor so most or all of the avenues to report malfeasance available to federal employees were not available to him. And if they had been available, it would not matter because statutory whistle-blower laws are intended to lure whistle-blowers into the open where they can be persecuted. He did the right thing.

    30. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could prevent a repeat by not doing anything they shouldn't.

      Stop being Fat Tony and pretending that the "rat" is the bad guy.

      Captcha: divulge

    31. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Referring to USA, not Oswald.

    32. Re: Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outside the country, there is nothing in US law that prevents it from spying on other countries.

      Outside the US, US law is completely irrelevant. I know of no country where it is legal for a foreign government to spy on people.

    33. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      His interview was originally aired on HBO. I'm sure you can find a pirated copy somewhere if it's not on youtube already.

    34. Re:Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, to prevent Snowden 2.0 the government has to actually follow the Constitution and comply with all our laws. So yeah they haven't done much in the way of fixing that, which really misses me off. These TLA blowhards think they are pariots, actually they are the traitors when they violate the Constitution and break the laws that were passed specifically to regulate their activities. Instead of chasing Snowden, the President at that time should have taken responsibility, fired the agency director, and led a serious conversation on how all of us, as nation, can find another way. Instead, I will be teaching my kids that you can't just people in uniform by their cover. Some of them are actually bad guys.

    35. Re: Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      So are you claiming that foreign governments don't spy on other foreign governments?

      Do you honestly believe that Britain doesn't spy on Germany? Germany doesn't spy on Spain? And Spain doesn't spy on Italy? Let alone them all not spying on Russia, China and Israel?

      What a fantasy filled world you must live in. Say hello to the unicorns for me.

    36. Re: Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Outside the country, there is nothing in US law that prevents it from spying on other countries.

      Outside the US, US law is completely irrelevant. I know of no country where it is legal for a foreign government to spy on people.

      Okay, but those domestic laws also do not apply the foreign governments. And around we go. In reality, spying is worked out between governments. It's not so much a matter of law ans policies and agreements.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    37. Re: Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not claiming they don't. I am merely claiming that it is illegal, which it is.

    38. Re: Not preventing Snowdon 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they do. They may not be enforced, but there is nothing that exempts the US or any other rogue state from the law.

  6. Let me play you a song by Snotnose · · Score: 5, Funny

    On my tiny violin.

    1. Re: Let me play you a song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agh dude that's gross! Put your dick away!

  7. Yeesh, would it be cheaper... by RyanFenton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wouldn't it be cheaper to, you know, not rely on extraordinary rendition, illegal spying, extra-constitutional structurally biased special courts, intra-agency webs of secrecy, and all that?

    This seems more than a bit like "If it weren't for those darn meddling kids, everything would have been fine, JUST FINE," then complaining how expensive that now-ruined mask on the floor was.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Yeesh, would it be cheaper... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right. It's not even clear who their audience is here. The people in power will spend whatever it costs to cement and maintain their power. The people in power also stay there by transferring money from the middle class to their special interests, for instance the intelligence contractors, so if more money is being spent in intelligence, it's not clear who loses besides the people who are being spied on themselves.

      It's telling that they're especially interested in Bitcoin because its only the value of the currency that they can print on demand to pay for some of this spying power that keeps them in power. If everybody switched to Bitcoin, for instance, their entire power structure will collapse in upon itself. Maybe then people would want a government that only protects their liberties ... wait, we tried that.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Yeesh, would it be cheaper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      >If everybody switched to Bitcoin, for instance, their entire power structure will collapse in upon itself.

      OH YEAH... That Koolaid looks delicious!

    3. Re:Yeesh, would it be cheaper... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      They should make information about government breaking federal or state laws non-classifiable.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    4. Re:Yeesh, would it be cheaper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck the government, ALL of them around the world.
      They're a fucking worthless, useless, redundant layer of leeching and chaos upon the world.
      Just fucking end them all.

      You can do better than them with your own two hands.
      Take charge of your own life, help your neighbors, build your own communities, businesses, roads, and rockets. Hire your own police forces, your own insurance, and retirement security investments. Create and give to your own charities for the downtrodden, disabled, and truly in need.

      You don't need government for ANY of that.

      In fact, when it comes right down to it,
      YOU DONT NEED GOVERNMENT FOR ANYTHING AT ALL.

    5. Re:Yeesh, would it be cheaper... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "everything would have been fine"

      The problem for the US gov is the hiring practices.
      Too many random people entering the US gov/mil have to be considered not for their loyalty and skill.

      The US gov could just hire on merit. Have top experts fill every sensitive gov job.
      The political leaders over decades have filled the US mil with random contractors and workers.
      Created mil/gov jobs in random states to win votes.
      Jobs that have to be filled from a random pool of local workers.

      The UK went for the "fine" approach and ensured its GCHQ, SAS, MI5/6 only got filled with trusted staff after decades of information loss.
      The US looked at the changed UK methods, considered the US political requests to hire "anyone" at a career fair and decided to just open gov/mil jobs to all.
      The politics of another nation, faith/cult loyal to another nation, citizenship and a criminal past could be looked over in the USA to work for the US gov.
      Lots of interesting new people got accepted as contractors.
      The USA is now full of cleared and trusted contractors the US gov and mil have ability to consider for security.
      The private contractor got "security" for a project and the approved workers got added.

      People with politics, people in cults, people with faiths that want to convert the USA long term, people with split loyalty to other nations, people 100% loyal to their own faith/another nation.
      Contractors with politics that wants to change the USA. People loyal to other nations political causes after decades working for the US gov/mil.

      The US mil/gov could have stopped all the personality types that walk out with secrets from entering the US mil/gov. But the political hiring practices have resulted in millions of people with no loyalty to the USA having a clearance.
      The US thinking on security over the past decades is that lots of unskilled staff makes the US more able to do more things globally.
      The security services got enriched over the decades by many different staff.
      Other nations, cults, faiths, criminal groups just line their spies up at US gov/mil career fair and watch as the resumes are accepted every decade.
      It would have been cheaper and more secure to actually know who wa entering the security services, getting a job as a contractor.
      But think of the local jobs, new staff, changes to the culture within gov. That radical change within the US gov resulted in so many new jobs for people who traditionally would have never had a security clearance.

      The USA mil/gov is now stuck with generations of staff it cant trust and never did deep background investigations on.
      But the staff now all reflect the wider US community and thats good politically.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:Yeesh, would it be cheaper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If it weren't for those darn meddling kids, everything would have been fine, JUST FINE,"

      Why, it's old man Curuthers from the amusement park!

    7. Re:Yeesh, would it be cheaper... by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      When hiring people you need to know what kind of trustworthyness you are seeking. People who can be trusted not to sell data to the Russians are a different group than people who can be trusted to not call the cops over your illegal activities.

    8. Re:Yeesh, would it be cheaper... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The US had a good system for that in the 1950-1980's
      The FBI would interview and walk the life story of anyone wanting a clearance.
      Their faith, politics, citizenship, any crimes, reading material, hobbies, unusual lifestyles, spending habits, debts, education, ability to learn, politics while getting an education, mil service.
      That would need interviews. A look at and talk with friends, teachers, educators, mil, coworkers. Did that person exist in the part of the USA they said they did.
      That later stopped when contractors did their own digital background investigations on people seeking work within the US gov.
      A state and federal database showed a person was a US citizen and that they are looking for work? Got a computer skill, language? Welcome to the exciting world of contractor work. A security clearance was just a part of the job not a reason for not getting a job.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  8. Stop attacking the world, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    the world is not your enemy, you paranoid PoS country. I hope we see more leaks so the world wakes up to all the wrong horrible things America is doing, and it becomes more and more clear how paranoid they are and how they view the world as an enemy.

    1. Re:Stop attacking the world, then by hondo77 · · Score: 2

      ...and it becomes more and more clear how paranoid they are and how they view the world as an enemy.

      You can't tell that by Donny starting a trade war with our allies?

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    2. Re:Stop attacking the world, then by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Too much overtime and contractors with trendy jobs to stop now.
      Listening in is addictive to the political leaders and the NSA budgets that grow.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  9. 1%? so shit is MUCH WORSE than already known? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    5 years has passed - would be nice if 100% of the data was released to us so the IT security professionals among us can actually do our jobs.

    1. Re:1%? so shit is MUCH WORSE than already known? by PPH · · Score: 1

      would be nice if 100% of the data was released

      A good part of that might expose the identity of agents in the field. And will never be released. Per Snowden's request to the media outlets to screen such data out.

      Dick Cheney probably exposed more undercover field agents when he outed Valerie Plame. And foreign intelligence just worked backwards finding links between her, her cover employer and other possible spies. Why isn't Cheney hiding in Russia?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:1%? so shit is MUCH WORSE than already known? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because Cheney didn't do it. Moron.

    3. Re:1%? so shit is MUCH WORSE than already known? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Why isn't Cheney hiding in Russia?

      I know you're trying to be funny, but unlike Snowden, Cheney is considered a war criminal there. Actually, technically he is here too... at least according to the law. It's somewhat profound to realize but, Snowden may actually be safer in more places around the world than Cheney.

    4. Re:1%? so shit is MUCH WORSE than already known? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure if we strapped him to a waterboard, he'd confess.

    5. Re:1%? so shit is MUCH WORSE than already known? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Nonetheless you're brushing away the fact that Cheney didn't reveal Valerie Plame as a US agent. Also, the witch hunters pursuing the 'leaker' knew who it was very very early in the investigation, but kept that a secret so that 'Blame Cheney' could be an effective mantra.

    6. Re:1%? so shit is MUCH WORSE than already known? by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      Too late to release the rest, none of the major news outlets care about Snowden anymore, I haven't heard of a Snowden leak in 2 or 3 years now.

  10. It cost me nothing by Revek · · Score: 1, Troll

    It cost the guilty nothing either. How many were fired after they were exposed? I haven't heard of a single person going to jail over any of it. It just cost them their reputation. Which is and will always be nothing. It only exposed what we already suspected. Our government will go to any lengths to keep their crimes secret.

    1. Re:It cost me nothing by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      Something like 80% of 2016 voters were motivated by government corruption ... so it probably had some affect on the DNC, although Hillary Clinton's culpability in this was probably limited compared to other players.

  11. There is no cost greater than.. by AnthonywC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Uncovering the truth and doing "The Right Thing".

  12. the biggest crime: embarrassing the NSA by sloth+jr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With all the revelations, the main takeaway I got is the NSA is pissed that they got caught acting poorly. Given their lack of apology, it's clear the NSA isn't at all motivated to, you know - change, and stuff. All the NSA seems to want to do is deliver maximum stitches to maximum snitches.

    I sleep better.

    1. Re:the biggest crime: embarrassing the NSA by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are more concerned about the steps being taken to stop their mass surveillance. Ever since the leaks the internet has become a lot more privacy and security focused, with encryption being used more and more to cover what were once considered mundane communications.

      Prior to Snowden was it relatively easy and cheap for them, now the cost is massively increased. Instead of unencrypted chat apps we now have all the major ones supporting strong encryption, often enabled by default and implemented so that the developer can't circumvent it.

      Getting caught it just an inevitable part of playing the spy game. It's the resulting privacy enhancements that really upset them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:the biggest crime: embarrassing the NSA by houghi · · Score: 1

      As there is no accountability, what else did you expect?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  13. Greatest Cost by cybersquid · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The greatest cost is the continuing loss of faith & trust in our government.

    The fact that the U.S. government continue to persecute this whistle-blower is much more damning than the things he revealed.

    IMO Snowden should be pardoned & given a medal.

    1. Re:Greatest Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The greatest cost is the continuing loss of faith & trust in our government.

      That's a load of crap! And the vote count confirms it. 95% of congress is still reelected every cycle, and over 98% of you people still vote for republican/democrat. Until that changes, you can choke on your post! In the meantime, take a good look at who you made president!

    2. Re:Greatest Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The fact that the U.S. government continue to persecute this whistle-blower is much more damning than the things he revealed.

      IMO Snowden should be pardoned & given a medal.

      While I agree that Snowden is the only hero in the situation, given the behavior we've seen so far, if you were in his place, if the US government suddenly pulled an about-face and publicly claimed to issue a pardon, inviting him to return home, would you trust them not to pounce the instant you set foot on US soil?

    3. Re:Greatest Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One issue is that politicians face 0 repercussions for not following through on their campaign promises.
      If I were to interview for a job and say I'd do X, Y and Z, then not so much as even attempt them, I'd be fired.

    4. Re:Greatest Cost by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2

      My dad told me one thing many years ago, the government is not your friend.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    5. Re:Greatest Cost by cybersquid · · Score: 1

      Actually, I am choking on the situation. Not happy at all.
      As for you: I don't think you need to choke on anything. You might want to calm down a bit, but no choking is necessary at this juncture.
      Also: your assumption is false; I am part of the majority of people who voted against Mr. Trump.

    6. Re:Greatest Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also: your assumption is false; I am part of the majority of people who voted against Mr. Trump.

      Nice evasion of the issue! Or maybe it really did go over your head! Hard to tell in a text forum

    7. Re:Greatest Cost by cybersquid · · Score: 1
      While I'd like to say:

      "Nothing goes over my head. My reflexes are too fast. I would catch it."

      ... the truth is I don't understand which issue you feel I evaded.
      Please elaborate.

    8. Re:Greatest Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Collectively you failed to nominate anybody better than Trump.. ever since Kennedy died, and you all are dancing the Russia, Russia, Russia jig, completely evading the fact that collectively you alone are responsible for the poor choices you make. Your *money in politics* blame game doesn't cut the mustard. You elect these people for the bling and promised handouts and then blame them for winning! It's fucking weird! That is, until you spend an instant watching The Animal Planet, which then clarifies everything.

      Snowden has had no effect on the empire. It stands as strong as it ever has. This *loss of faith and trust* you speak of is complete and utter bullshit, and the numbers that matter reflect exactly that, despite what Slashdot groupthink (crybaby Hillary voters) tells you. How simple can it be??

    9. Re:Greatest Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he's doing a great job you sewer rat!

    10. Re:Greatest Cost by wierd_w · · Score: 2

      Respect is EARNED, not given.

      Considering that the NSA has done very little to re-earn that trust and respect, and has instead doubled down on the blanket spying, improper handling of classified data, and in general has been in denial about how it is improper of them, even if the congress has made it legal, to conduct such actions against the US's native population.

      So, take a moment to reflect. What possible reason does the US public have to respect this agency, when this agency openly mocks the public's demands for redress of grievance, when this agency repeatedly lies to congress about the necessity for "encryption back doors", when this agency repeatedly lobbies congress to make more and more atrocious data collection legal, etc?

      Simply because they are the government, does not mean they are immediately deserving of respect or trust. Simply because they have made their actions legal, does not make them morally justifiable. (Neither does it being the easiest or most efficent solution make it so.)

      Snowden revealed what people had been suspicious of for decades. While before, the NSA could say that people who were distrustful were just paranoid cranks, now the dirty laundry is out, and they cannot be so dismissive. They are angry that they are being called to task for their undesired actions by the people who (per our constitution) hold the real political power of this country, and instead of altering their behavior and methods, they have doubled down on the lobbying pressure against the legislative and judicial branches of government to MAKE their invasions of privacy legal.

      So, in all seriousness-- what has the NSA done, post Snowden, to warrant even a tiny bit of return of trust and respect, given the clear and present disrespect that the agency shows for the American public?

    11. Re:Greatest Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your dad was lazy.

      The government can be you friend, but that requires a vigilant population.

      If you're not willing to follow politics more than just listening to the politicians marketing campaigns then yes, you get a government that is hostile to you.

      If you have a population that spend as much time researching before they vote as they do before they buy a car then you get a friendly government.

    12. Re:Greatest Cost by nazrhyn · · Score: 1

      The greatest cost is the continuing loss of faith & trust in our government.

      cybersquid never said whose continuing loss of faith. Certainly mine and, I'd assume, his/hers as well. It appears to be an assumption that he/she was speaking for the whole United States, collectively. On topic, for my part, I'm at a loss as to how to change a system that's self-reinforcing.

      If you take this office, you'll get free money. Now, your task for this session is to create laws that prevent you from getting free money.

      How is that supposed to work? That's just lobbying, of all the issues we face.

      How simple can it be??

      Not very simple, in this case, I think.

    13. Re:Greatest Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter whose loss of faith and trust... He has no numbers to back up the statement, which the vote count belies completely, and business is as good as ever too. He is expressing wishful thinking. It is meaningless, just democrat sour grapes.

      a system that's self-reinforcing.

      Simple blame passing. The voters can and do choose who they want. They are the ones reinforcing the system. Nobody forces them.

      Apparently the simplicity passes over your head also. Maybe it's intentional to maintain the false narrative that it's always somebody else's fault.

    14. Re:Greatest Cost by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      Given that I can't control the population, I'd rather have a small government than a hostile government.

    15. Re:Greatest Cost by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      That's just not accurate. Obama told us he was going to try to turn the U.S. into a socialist paradise and he spent eight years trying to do that.

      Trump told us he was going to lower taxes, kill U.S. participation in the Paris agreement, penalize China for manipulating the Dollar, recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, role back EPA rules imposed by the Obama administration, etc.

      Republicans hated Obama because he kept his promises.

      Democrats hate Trump because he is keeping his promises.

      Sanders terrified mainstream Democrats and Republicans because they were afraid he'd keep his promises.

  14. TLDs upset that people realize spying on US exists by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Look, I still don't think Snowden helping Russia is a good thing, especially the many attempts in the US, Australia, Canada, and the UK to interfere (which are still ongoing, regardless of my personal viewpoint that Scotland deserves to be it's own nation, as it has always been, and the Soviet-backed Brexit was atrocious).

    But, the agencies (five of which you know about, others which you don't) that are actively spying on US citizens both at home and abroad, did in fact go too far.

    That said, using clouds or any external non-controlled data stores always is insecure, just like the President's cell traffic which is easy to locate to within centimetres.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  15. Loss of moral authority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The major consequenses will be felt long term in little ways internationally. An extra line in a contract, viewing products in the same light as others, general suspicion of motives.

    American allies were raised on a diet of propaganda that Snowden helped show was false. That loss of moral authority has allowed a rise in the popularity of figures like Putin. After all, it's hard to say someone is a liar when people already knows you are. The problem isn't Snowden, it's the U.S.A.

    1. Re:Loss of moral authority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What 'propaganda' did snow show was false?
      Real links, please.

    2. Re:Loss of moral authority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He destroyed the myth that Five Eyes were not spying on their own citizens and/or passing the data to the NSA. He destroyed the myth that the NSA was not spying on American citizens. Basically, he destroyed the myth that our governments did not lie to us.

      To quote Oliver Stone,"We are the terrorists, many times. In Syria we are supporting the terrorist group, the Al-Nusra front. We don’t report to the people, what we’re really doing. We report our point of view, our propaganda."

      Clapper lying https://duckduckgo.com/?q=clapper+not+spying+on+citizens&t=canonical&iax=videos&ia=videos&iai=AGYn7ER5U_0

      Obama lying http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/obama-says-there-no-spying-americans

      Gen. Keith Alexander lying http://www.ibtimes.com/nsa-chief-denies-agency-employees-can-spy-americans-1312799

      Five Eyes used to target NZ citizens https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/08/new-zealand-appears-to-have-used-nsa-spy-network-to-target-kim-dotcom/

      NSA gathering Aussie communications http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-11-08/australian-nsa-involvement-explained/5079786

      etc.....

    3. Re:Loss of moral authority by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Illegal domestic spying AC. Something that should have stopped in the 1970's AC.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  16. Snowden's effect is nil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We still have tons of people that believe that google doesn't track you if you avoid using their 'services'. And those same people think we should invade Syria, blame the Russians for poorly made choices, and on, and on, and on...

    If Snowden represented a real danger, he would simply be dead, end of story.. Like so many things this is a distraction.

    I have to post AC because I am in violation of Slashdot groupthink. You will have to find another way to attack my account

    1. Re:Snowden's effect is nil by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The world knows of the big US brands that helped and supported PRISM.
      The networks that did not have the skills to detect gov collect it all deep in their most secure big brand networks.
      The big US brands that sold and gave away junk crypto as crypto standards.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  17. Why are the docs still being revealed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why aren't they all out by now? Why are journalists acting as gatekeepers?

    1. Re:Why are the docs still being revealed? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Politics. Publishers have their own party politics to consider and present.
      Release the junk crypto facts and let the internet sort it out.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  18. And Clapper is still not in jail for perjury by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Instead, he's landed a cushy job at CNN.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:And Clapper is still not in jail for perjury by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I suspect there's some sticky politics and/or national secrets connected to this story, and that's why more representatives didn't push for prosecution. It's as if those in the know in both parties don't want to open Pandora's box to the public. It's why pundits are loud but representatives relatively quiet.

    2. Re:And Clapper is still not in jail for perjury by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      While selling books with the word 'truth' printed on the cover. And people find him credible, because he tells them exactly what he thinks they want to hear. It just works.

    3. Re:And Clapper is still not in jail for perjury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just run-of-the-mill political deference to the intelligence agencies. Its not like there isn't a decades long history of that, no conspiracy required.

      Its so utterly wrong that the only one signifcantly pushing back on the spies is trump, but he's not doing it out of any principle greater than shirking responsibility for his crimes. In the long run he's going to end up strengthening them because his so very public objections are so obviously self-serving that anyone with legitimate criticisms in the future will just be tarred with his corruption and ignored.

    4. Re:And Clapper is still not in jail for perjury by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      In the long run he's going to end up strengthening them because his so very public objections are so obviously self-serving that anyone with legitimate criticisms in the future will just be tarred with his corruption and ignored.

      And, isn't that surprisingly convenient? We finally get someone in a position of power that hasn't been filtered through the political sieve for years, and he is immediately tarred badly enough to be suspect. The tarring process includes circumstances that would have raised howls in the media if it had been conservatives spying on a democrat, but somehow a little semantic juggling of replacing "spy" with "informant" makes it all fine in this case. Either way, an actual 'citizen', without years of political skeletons that the 'intelli-rati' can use, is politically crippled with very questionable evidence.

      Like I said. Surprisingly convenient for Clapper, et. al.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  19. NSA should spy on everyone outside the USA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NSA should spy on everyone outside the USA.
    I'm pissed about spying on US permanent residents and
    data, phone, wire, wifi, RF signals trapping without warrants inside the USA.
    Basically, the USGovt violating the 4th Amendment - that make me sad.
    Certainly all the TLA are doing lots of good things, but how we play the game matters. It says important things about who we are as a people.
    When it comes to a declared war...you know congress says we are at war - then the govt should do everything they can to destroy the enemy, take away his will to fight, completely. But we aren't at war anywhere I'm aware.

    1. Re:NSA should spy on everyone outside the USA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NSA WAS spying on those outside of America.
      What is your point?

    2. Re:NSA should spy on everyone outside the USA. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Illegal domestic collection should have stopped in the 1970's.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:NSA should spy on everyone outside the USA. by houghi · · Score: 1

      It didn't. Now what? I hear people talk about how things should be and what the law says and what the constitution says and so on.
      These are mere words that where written down at some point in time and as such are meaningless. The words themselves have no impact. I can say "I want to be rich." I could even make a law that says I must be rich. Yes unless people act upon those words, they are meaningless.

      The main issue is that there is no accountability. If I tell a kid that he is not allowed to take a cookie and he takes one, if there are no accountability, why would he not take another one.
      If there IS accountability, e.g. he must go to bed early or no PC for a week, he might STILL eat the cookie, sure, but he knew what would happen.

      Where we are now is that the NSA says and almost brags that they are spying on everybody and nothing happens. Nothing. So why should they stop? Why should they change? What do they gain if they change? Their work becomes harder to do. It will be more expensive. They already believe they are good citizens, so that is not a solution. And why do they think they are good citizens? Because if they are not, they would be held accountable.

      Without accountability, all the words and laws are just interesting things for a writer to drive a plot, like the 3 laws of robotics.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:NSA should spy on everyone outside the USA. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re It didn't. Now what?
      The CIA and NSA faced closed gov question is the 1970's. That was it.
      The thinking goes that budgets got restricted.
      Iran Contra was the thinking around any such US gov funding changes to world wide CIA activities.
      The US gov said no more funds? Create your own agency funds using products and services that are in demand and do the mission.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  20. The Most Terrible Deterrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of penalty for a treason or mishandling of classified documents, make an itemized bill and represent it to the policy violator. Bring in some Germanic justice to counteract this mercilessness of Roman law!

  21. Brings to mind thrash group Sabbat by jd · · Score: 1

    A Cautionary Tale:

    "Think for just one moment and I'm sure that you will see,
    the moral of this story - that what shall be must be.
    He who gives his soul to Hell, must dare to pay the price,
    he versed in divinity must live a noble life -
    OR ELSE HE IS DAMNED!"

    The wages of government stupidity is maybe another century of these releases. Governments can't keep secrets, so they're ethical to within practical limits, or else they are damned.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  22. Value to the American Public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Priceless.

  23. Snowden not a hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to counter the groupthink on this, but Snowden needed to find a legal way of accomplishing his goals without breaking the law. Additionally, I do not think that spying on Americans has decreased any, look at what happened to Trump's campaign.

    You want to stop spying by the government?? Punish those harshly for spying on the Trump campaign.

    It really feels like people are talking out of both sides of their mouth here.

    1. Re: Snowden not a hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be under the impression that the US populace doesn't rationalize blanket spying.

      Just buy the wrong series of books, visit certain websites, and fit some supposed personality type determined by an unscientific algorithm and you too can be the subject of not just intrusive digital spying in your own country, but the subject of an active secret investigation without legal recourse of any kind.

  24. Catch 22 by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    The problem with trickling out the documents over such a long period of time is that people ultimately get bored or complacent with it all and pay little attention to it. It's human nature.

    Think of the nightly news.
    It's full of non-stop murder and mayhem every single day and most of us don't even blink an eye at it anymore.

    The Catch-22 part of the problem is this:

    If you released it all en masse, many will raise hell for a few weeks then promptly forget about it as soon as the next tragedy or engineered distraction comes along. Either way, the information becomes irrelevant soon enough.

    Personally, I think they should just release the cache and let folks decide for ourselves what we think of it all instead of continuing to dangle that carrot. Though, folks like The Guardian or The Intercept love to have their name in the headlines from time to time so folks remember they exist, so we'll probably be seeing bits and pieces of this forever.

    I see little reason not to as the Government has had YEARS to pull folks from the field in the event the unredacted documents put anyone in harms way. If they haven't, then it tells me they're not concerned about it as they claim to be.

    1. Re:Catch 22 by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      At this rate the offical declassification will catch up with the media publication.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re: Catch 22 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The problem with trickling out the documents over such a long period of time is that people ultimately get bored or complacent with it all and pay little attention to it. It's human nature.

      Prove your logic. What you have said is so incredibly general, you haven't really said anything at all.

  25. Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The price tag will be 100 quintrillion dollars added with interest over the next 50 years means the entire world will owe the US a lot of $$ based on the copyright infringement alone. But then again, China would rather flip us the bird and continue their quest for power and getting all our sh*t for free.

  26. trumptard 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You didn't witness or report shit. If you did, you'll have no trouble coming up with a citation. I'm not even asking for 3. These cases are public record. Gimme a name and a state.

    The most interesting part of your post is why you're being such a dick about it. Especially after you got the citation you asked for. What's in this for you? Did you share an office with Snowden or something?

    Oh nevermind, I see the issue. Someone said trump and you shat your panties. You didn't even bother to read or acknowledge the context of the statement with the word in it. No one said this was trump's fault. As you so "brilliantly" pointed out, Obama isn't the goddamned president any more. So why in the fuck would a current person of the current administration whistleblow to Obama? You seriously can't see just how stupid you are. You're a partisan hack, a trumptard 2.0 as it were.

    1. Re:trumptard 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both Obama AND Trump are complete shit, total wastes and redundant, as with ALL politicians and governments in their entirety.
      Eventually you will research Voluntarism, Libertarianism, Anarchism... and come to realize that is true.
      Till then you will remain trapped in the servitude, taxation, slavery, theft, war, and police statist bullshit TV progamming you love to suckle on.

  27. Re:TLDs upset that people realize spying on US exi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Look, I still don't think Snowden helping Russia is a good thing

    The only evidence that he's helped russia is by capitalizing on his position as a public source of embarrassment to the US to garner asylum in russia. A choice he was forced into by the US cancelling his passport while he was en-route through a russian airport.

    Contrast that to somebody like Assange who has not only knowingly served as a cut-out for russian disinfo operations, but also participated in them himself, particularly his public embrace of seth rich conspiracy lies to simultaneously puff himself up and put his thumb on the scale in US elections.

    The day Snowden starts collaborating with the russians to advance their authoritarian agenda I will totally cut him loose. But for now there is no evidence he's doing anything to help them beyond simply continuing to breath in the place circumstances beyond his control put him.

  28. Do you know any other tunes? by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

    Do you know any other tunes? It turns out what you're playing for is only the beginning of the story. Here is something from the middle.

    Vicious truck attack kills 84 during France fireworks display
    Berlin massacre reminiscent of deadly Nice attack (12 dead, 48 injured)
    Barcelona attack as it happened: At least 13 dead and 100 injured after van hits crowd in act of terror

    We don't know how it will end yet, but the portents aren't good.

    German Intel Report Reveals Extent Of Islamist Infiltration In Germany

    You can avert your eyes if you want to, or refuse to hear, but that will not stop the truck, bomb, knife, machinegun, . . .

    How Edward Snowden Changed the Habits of a Terrorist

    There is only one person I know who changed behavior because of Snowden. In October of last year, I traveled to Kenya to meet members of al Shabaab, an al Qaeda linked group that had pulled off a spectacular attack on an upscale mall in Nairobi a month earlier. One of the members, a man named Abdul, changed the SIM card on his mobile repeatedly. When I asked him why, he gave me a one-word answer:

    “Snowden.”

    It's all good, right?

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re: Do you know any other tunes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nigga please. Next you're gonna say Snowden is responsible for Al Capone knowing his phones were tapped?

      Get fucking real.

    2. Re:Do you know any other tunes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also changed behavior because of Snowden.

      It's only thanks to Snowden that I found out what my employer's software was being used for. At that moment, I vowed never to work for a defense contractor ever again.

    3. Re:Do you know any other tunes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, Snowden has taught the terrorists to evade detection, and you (among others) swear to not aid in finding them. What could possibly go wrong?

      Hopefully not coming soon to a neighborhood near you:
      Mogadishu Truck Bomb's Death Toll Now Tops 500, Probe Committee Says

      The terrorists are proud of their attacks. You're proud of refusing to help develop methods to stop them. Aren't there proverbs about pride?

    4. Re:Do you know any other tunes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are proud of your government wiretapping you without a warrant, you're allowed to feel that way. In turn, I'm allowed to feel bad about being part of it.

      Nobody asked me if I was okay with helping the government break the law.

  29. The Hacker's Crackdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The E911 Document was also proving a weak reed. It had originally been valued at $79,449.

    Computer-knowledgeable people found this value -- for a twelve-page bureaucratic document -frankly incredible. In his "Crime and Puzzlement" manifesto for EFF, Barlow commented: "We will probably never know how this figure was reached or by whom, though I like to imagine an appraisal team consisting of Franz Kafka, Joseph Heller, and Thomas Pynchon."

    Zenner gave the witness a copy of "BellSouth E911 Service Interfaces," which cost, as he pointed out, $13, straight from the catalog. "Look at it carefully," he urged Ms. Williams, "and tell me if it doesn't contain about twice as much detailed information about the E911 system of BellSouth than appeared anywhere in Phrack."

    http://nuclear.gla.ac.uk/~protopop/archive/hacker/part4.php

    1. Re:The Hacker's Crackdown by Savantissimo · · Score: 2

      The documentation of the COSMOS wiring database was the bigger issue in that case, IIRC. Same basic deal, though, got it through dumpster diving, could have been bought officially for a few bucks. That database lets you do the really fun stuff like assign lines to accounts. OTOH using it is pretty much its own punishment (e.g. working out the 3 letter wire-center code from the exchange key = 1st 3 of 7 digit phone #) and in later years the official documentation was basically nonexistent (oral tradition and a few 5th generation photocopies on cubicle walls, basically).
      -ex-BS MMT

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  30. yup by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    lotta america haters here. smells like potatos and vodka.

    1. Re:yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lotta america haters here. smells like potatos and vodka.

      The American government acts all righteous while screwing everyone over, and Ryanrule the patriot bends over to take it without any lube.

  31. Lame Terrorist Panic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, you think that "Abdul" changed his behavior because of Snowden? Terrorists have been using burner phones for years, long before Snowden showed up. Bin Laden and al-Qaeda were using burners at least a decade ago. Bin Laden himself went entirely off-grid in order to prevent electronic tracking of his whereabouts (which protected him for a while, but not enough to make him invulnerable).

    But fine. Let's pretend the terrorists don't know about the Three Letter Agencies, about all the spying and monitoring. Let's pretend that every President since 9/11 hasn't given security their top priority and blessing to intrude upon every private conversation. Let's forget that even President Clinton tried to kill Bin Laden, long before 9/11.

    Yes, it's all on Snowden. In fact there would be no terrorists at all if it weren't for Snowden, right? You'd like to say that right?

    Right.

  32. Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

    No, it smells like apple pie.

  33. Na, they'll wuss out like the NRA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what I call "extreme libertarianism": repeal civilization and go back to "caveman" days, perhaps like Flintstones meet Mad Max. Their convention would be a hoot, that's for sure.

    Nah, libertarians will pussy-out like the NRA did when they banned guns at their last convention. "Do as I say, not as I do" they say to their low-information followers, and their followers do just that. Their conventions are boring, filled with soul-destroying dogma, hysterical extreme-right cheerleading, and predictable anti-establishment, anti-government, anti-progressive rhetoric. Yawn inducing on the best of days.

  34. Recursive function by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calculating the cost of the Snowden Leak is a recursive function that will result in a stack/budget overflow.

  35. Still a Hero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps Snowden alone delayed the arrival of Big Brother by 5 years. Heroic. Where can we find another?