Slashdot Mirror


Suicide Rates Are Up 30 Percent Since 1999, CDC Says (nbcnews.com)

New submitter Austerity Empowers writes: Amidst all the name calling and straw man arguments about the overall health of America, sometimes it helps to look at data from people who sacrificed everything based on their perception of reality. Whatever politics you subscribe to, the feeling of hopelessness is evidently real, and frightening. NBC News: "Suicide rates are up by 30 percent across the nation since 1999, federal health officials reported Thursday. And only about half the people who died by suicide had a known mental health condition, even though depression had been thought to be the major cause of suicide, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said. While many cases of mental illness may have been diagnosed, the CDC also noted that relationship stress, financial troubles and substance abuse were contributing to the trends."

64 of 478 comments (clear)

  1. How surprising,... by AbRASiON · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Really? Who could have guessed.

    The division between the rich and poor, is without a question, worse than it was in 1999.
    Hope is fading out for the middle and lower class. The middle class becomes smaller, soon to be just "the poors and the rich"

    On top of this, the world is straight the fuck up, dying. We're not working towards protecting it very well, we're not working towards replacing it (finding a new one elsewhere)

    Then we have the internet, it's giving the poor access to see what's going on in the world better, they can see just how rich the rich are becoming, they can see the death of the world better than ever before, they can communicate with each other (as I am right now) elaborating on why there's little hope.

    Co2 is up, heat is up, methane bubbles are going off in siberia, animals are dying out, bees are dying off, America is slowly crumbling into debt. (no, I'm not American)

    No fucking shit suicides are up 30%, I have to wonder what % of the suicide people are actually mentally broken or just strong enough to say "you know what, fuck all this"

    1. Re:How surprising,... by novakyu · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is the most ignorant thing I have read this year so far. Everybody knows that the poor do not commit suicide at higher rates.

    2. Re:How surprising,... by AbRASiON · · Score: 2

      I'm not talking about the poor, I'm talking about those who were middle and upper middle or the chidlren of middle / upper middle, seeing "oh fuck, shit I'm going to be poorer than my parents"

    3. Re:How surprising,... by AbRASiON · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Read my post history, I no longer identify as a leftie. I'm a centrist.
      The far right (climate deniers, most hard religious folk) are fucking idiots.

      SJW's are censoring dipshits.

      No, I'm just a realist, with a dose of common sense and the simple ability to understand mathematics, sustainability, very very basic economics.

      If you don't see how fucked we are, you're in denial. This ain't about politics, it's about logic.

    4. Re: How surprising,... by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      Quit whining and look at a graph of say the 1900 onward. Someone picked a year with a dip to invent fake news. The suicide rate had been going up and down and up again, so picking the recent minimum as a start date makes something that resonates with the made-up head canon you have. Meanwhile nothing out of the ordinary is happening

    5. Re:How surprising,... by jenningsthecat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Listening to all that shit is enough to want to off myself.

      Seriously, it's finger pointing and blaming you lefties are doing which is driving everyone down the hole.

      "Finger pointing" is usually taken to mean singling out a person or group for blame. I didn't see that anywhere in the post you're whining about. OTOH - "lefties"? Who's doing the finger pointing here? Look in the mirror, Mr. AC Dolt!

      Sanctimonious bunch of hypocrites the lot of you... Keep destroying the family... Keep promoting divisions between folks.

      Who's more sanctimonious and divisive? The OP, who is simply pointing out legitimate problems? Or you, who clings to 'family values' tropes, and blames a statement of verifiable facts for "promoting divisions"?

      You're all so blind you've lost touch with reality.

      Say what? You've just stuck your fingers in your ears and started singing "la la la la", so don't be lecturing others about their hold on reality.

      You cross the line, forget to respect the boundries that maintain a healthy medium for everyone else.

      In the context of this discussion, there's so much out of place in what you've just said, that it's hard to know where to start. What line was crossed in the OP? What "boundries" weren't respected? How does one maintain a "healthy medium" when the suicide rate is up 30% and the planet is crumbling? Here's a hint - your cherished family values ain't worth shit unless you accept that your "family" is the entire human race. That includes the creepy uncles, serial killers, and despots, as well as the kind aunts, great artists, and those who put their lives on the line for their fellow man - and everybody in between.

      If you were trolling - and I suspect you were - then please continue. I'm happy to build houses with your sticks and stones - especially when they fail to hit the mark and simply fall at my feet, ready to be turned into something that's possibly helpful.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    6. Re:How surprising,... by novakyu · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, I'm just better at reading than you are:

      Analyses at the community level are significantly more likely to demonstrate lower rates of suicide among higher socio-economic areas than studies using larger areas of aggregation.

      Read between the lines; socioeconomic status of a person is not the primary determinant of likelihood of suicide. That's why they had to drill down to community level, in order to eliminate confounding variables. There are factors aside from wealth status that affect suicide rates by a greater amount.

    7. Re:How surprising,... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3

      significantly more likely to demonstrate lower rates of suicide among higher socio-economic areas

      That very clearly and unambiguously says that suicide rates are lower among areas that are less poor and/or experiencing less strife.

      No need to read between the lines, it is a simple statement that leaves little room for interpretation.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:How surprising,... by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      It's hard to imagine someone feeling depressed enough to kill themselves simply because they're poorer than their parents. And BTW, that has been going on since Generation X, it didn't just start in 1999.

      I would suggest there are more relevant factors, which may or may not have contributed, including:

      - Increased financial difficulties for the bottom 98%. Wages haven't kept up with inflation after all, although I don't see the CoL as being much higher today than it was in 2012
      - Increased complexity of life causing more stress
      - Increased social interactions with people who don't give a shit about you and will be unpleasant because they're not dealing with you face to face, thanks to the Internet, indirectly causing a loss in self esteem

      I don't think any one of these by themselves is the cause of anything, but add everything together and a huge number of people are going to find it harder to cope with life, suffering more pressure and having less confidence in themselves to deal with it.

      Psychiatrists will argue that all suicide is "caused by" depression which none of the above contribute to. I'd argue they're full of shit, that depression - a condition characterized by lethargy and an unwillingness to take risks - is the brain's way of preventing you (well, discouraging you) from committing suicide, which is why the two are correlated - people who aren't considering killing themselves or otherwise doing something self destructive are in no need of that self defense mechanism.

      And I'm inclined to think that this survey underlines that. There's been no massive up take in drugs that cause depression since 1999. Just an increase in things that make life miserable and difficult to cope with.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    9. Re:How surprising,... by mentil · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So it's not how rich YOU are, it's how rich your NEIGHBORHOOD is?
      I think that's Exhibit A for why the 1% hoarding the world's wealth won't turn out well for anybody, even themselves. Sure they can lock themselves up in a gated community and try to surround themselves with other affluent people, but they'd have to pretty much avoid all contact with the outside world (TV, internet, newspapers, books, cinema, music, even video games.)

      There's a reason superhero movies are so popular right now, and it's not (just) because Marvel just now figured out how to get their shit together.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    10. Re:How surprising,... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No fucking shit suicides are up 30%, I have to wonder what % of the suicide people are actually mentally broken or just strong enough to say "you know what, fuck all this"

      Well, I suppose it is true that things have never ever been this bad, amirite?

      Never ever. This is the absolute worst time in history.

      Sarcasm aside, I can't help thinking that economic conditions don't have much to do with this. The overwhelming "cause" at 42 percent is relationship issues. Interestingly in the article, other than noting that cause, nothing was done to address it, only things like housing and programs to make people feel like they belong.

      We've had several around here that were people checking out after a divorce. I suppose there is a certain financial aspect to that - in all cases the suicidee had been financially destroyed, but no one around here has killed themselves because of not having a place to live.

      I'm pretty convinced that at times, suicide is just the simpler and more effective option.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:How surprising,... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      People who are born into poverty are used to it and can see that other people somehow cope. When people have been comfortable for their whole lives and then a financial crash hits and end up with nothing, and don't have the mental tools to cope with that loss and uncertainty and angst and anger... That's what causes depression.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:How surprising,... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Read my post history, I no longer identify as a leftie. I'm a centrist. The far right (climate deniers, most hard religious folk) are fucking idiots.

      Very true.

      SJW's are censoring dipshits

      You forgot to add Racist, Sexist, and soft fascist. But otherwise, yeah.

      No, I'm just a realist, with a dose of common sense and the simple ability to understand mathematics, sustainability, very very basic economics.

      You should give some thought to pragmatist. Both sides of the political spectrum - actually far left and fr right are almost identical in aim if not the details - have some concepts that work, and some that are dopey.

      You're most of the way there. Becoming a pragmatist means you'll piss most everyone off. Far right will call you a socialist, far left a fascist, but they'll be really confused because you pick positions that make sense, not party/ideology dictated.

      If you don't see how fucked we are, you're in denial. This ain't about politics, it's about logic.

      Things have been fucked up before, they will be fucked up again. The best thing about pragmatism is that once you accept it, the rage eventually goes away.

      Although it is fun to troll the far right and far left. You must do this because they deserve it.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    13. Re:How surprising,... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      That very clearly and unambiguously says that suicide rates are lower among areas that are less poor and/or experiencing less strife.

      No need to read between the lines, it is a simple statement that leaves little room for interpretation.

      The numbers speak for themselves 42 percent are attributed to a relationship problem. Only 16 percent were financially based - although I wonder how they differentiate. In my neck of the woods, there have been several suicides that were both relationship based as well as financially based. This was in nasty divorce cases where one of the ex-partners was financially decimated.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    14. Re:How surprising,... by GrumpySteen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know this post is probably a troll, but I'm going to respond anyway.

      If you're actually considering committing suicide, maybe you should stop focusing on responding to posts that piss you off and call a suicide hotline.

      Or, if you're unwilling to try to get help, go the fuck outside and enjoy what's left or your life and stop dwelling on online arguments. You might find that life is actually a lot more livable without the influx of garbage that comes from being online all the time.

    15. Re:How surprising,... by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That very clearly and unambiguously says that suicide rates are lower among areas that are less poor and/or experiencing less strife.

      No need to read between the lines, it is a simple statement that leaves little room for interpretation.

      The numbers speak for themselves 42 percent are attributed to a relationship problem. Only 16 percent were financially based - although I wonder how they differentiate. In my neck of the woods, there have been several suicides that were both relationship based as well as financially based. This was in nasty divorce cases where one of the ex-partners was financially decimated.

      The point is that if you're really rich and you have to give half your wealth to your ex-wife/husband, you're still fairly rich. If you're just coping financially and have to give half your wealth to your ex-wife/husband, you're then suddenly poor.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    16. Re:How surprising,... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not talking about the poor, I'm talking about those who were middle and upper middle or the chidlren of middle / upper middle, seeing "oh fuck, shit I'm going to be poorer than my parents"

      Offspring that are poorer than their parents is not a new phenomenon. Drive and success are not a lock between generations, in some cases, the opposite is true. I came from poor stock, but blessed or cursed with drive, I far outpaced them.

      As well, in many cases, these parents only looked more wealthy. The children of the 80's and 90's were often living in families that had pretend wealth - maxed out credit cards, refinanced homes to buy that Escalade, flat or no savings.

      It was the middle class playing rich, and it all blew up around them.

      But experiencing being poor as well as being wealthy, I wasn't unhappy at all being poor.I had no intention to stay poor, but I wasn't even upset, much less suicidal. If young people today are committing suicide because of their financial situation not being that of their parents - we have failed them by teaching them that money is the only source of happiness, and without it, life is nt worth living.

      As for my theory, I lay a lot of blame on the self esteem movement. I saw a lot of Millennials crashing and burning when they found out the world links self esteem with actual achievements, not something inculcated in a person for no other reason than thinking that they are the most important person in the whole wide world.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    17. Re: How surprising,... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Owning stocks does not keep money in circulation. Owning overpriced property does not keep money in circulation. Owning rare artwork does not keep money in circulation. Offshoring profits to tax havens does not keep money in circulation.

      The 1% absolutely does hoard their wealth and they've spent the last 40 years using their influence to get laws rewritten to exempt them from taxes so that they can hoard even more while given less than ever back to society.

    18. Re:How surprising,... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2

      When you are too biased, the center often looks to be the other side.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    19. Re: How surprising,... by vivian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You are partly right.
      Owning residential property does not keep money in circulation, but owning stocks does - it's money that can directly be used by the company to buy machinery and hire people to work.

      One of the problems Australia has, is that because of certain tax deductions that can be made investing in property (negative gearing, which lets you write renal losses off against your income tax), everyone thinks it's a great idea to buy a second or third property as an "investment" even if it earns less rent than the costs of financing and other expenses.

      This is pushing house prices up to stupid levels - average houses now cost more than 12x average income) while at the same time, starving the country inf investment capital, so it's very hard to get a new business up and running - there simply aren't enough people willing to invest in new businesses, instead of property. Likewise, its very hard to get a loan from the bank to start a business - but very easy to get ridiculous oversized loans to buy residential property.

      Back to the topic at hand though - I personally think that income level has relatively little to do with happiness. The real problem is when you start to live outside your means, often in an attempt to keep up with the jones's. More than ever before, we are bombarded with images of how we should be living, what the "in crowd" on social media are are doing and how much that rapper guy with all his bitches is doing so great, with his mega yacht and bling..

      Is it any wonder it's so hard to keep a realistic perspective on what's needed to live a happy life, and focusing on the important things like eating right, exercising well, and spending time with family and friends instead of plugged in 24/7?

      I blame social media.

    20. Re:How surprising,... by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is why suicides are up, I agree.
      Oh, not with your facts - your facts are almost entirely wrong, tendentious, or meaningless.
      What I'm pointing to is YOUR histrionic overreaction to asserted facts that make you think that "everything is terrible"...when in fact, despite what CNN is telling you 24/7: life in 2018 is pretty fucking great by every objective measure.

      "The division between the rich and poor, is without a question, worse than it was in 1999.": So? It's better than it was through the bulk of human history.

      "the world is straight the fuck up, dying" No, it isn't. Humans have likely overpopulated the planet, but believe me, there will be a correction. And the earth itself? Won't even notice. The earth's ecosystems have been through FAR more cataclysmic changes than humanity could ever inflict at our worst, and after some oscillations, has returned to a fairly stable norm. Yes, likely that correction will kill lots of people but TBH with 7000+ million on the planet, losing even 50-100 million really isn't as big a deal objectively as everyone makes it out to be. (Setting aside "every life is sacred" bullshit that nobody ACTUALLY believes except at their own convenience.)

      "Then we have the internet" which is basically the problem.

      "Co2 is up, heat is up", the paleoclimate has spiked both CO2 and temps regularly about every 120k-140k years ago. Last one was about...140k years ago. Really, aside from some postmodern ethnocentric narcissism that insists humans are the center of everything, this is normal.

      "methane bubbles are going off in siberia", happened before. There's clearly some feedback mechanism that reacts to send the climate plummeting again.

      "animals are dying out, bees are dying off" yep, adapt or die; that's how Darwin works. Of course, you're only talking about highly specialized megafauna in regards animals, which are a vanishingly tiny part of the earth's ecosystems. Bees? Try facts, instead of popculture hysteria.
        https://www.attn.com/stories/1... and http://www.slate.com/articles/...

      "America is slowly crumbling into debt." America has been plunging into debt (not slowly) since Vietnam. Think about that: we are the wealthiest society ever in human history, yet we STILL can't pay for everything we want to have. Evolution works by death, and a society so wedded to consumption beyond its means gets what it deserves.

      Violent crime is down. Modern politics are far tamer than they were 200 years ago. The economy is roaring ahead. Unemployment is at a long-time low (historic lows for minorities!). Women, minorities, and historically marginalized groups are treated legally fully as equals, and culturally we're getting there. People living at the "poverty line" in the US are better off than 85%+ of the rest of the world, including (by some measures) better than the middle class in Europe. (https://www.heritage.org/poverty-and-inequality/report/air-conditioning-cable-tv-and-xbox-what-poverty-the-united-states) From that link:

      The typical poor household, as defined by the government, has a car and air conditioning, two color televisions, cable or satellite TV, a DVD player, and a VCR. By its own report, the typical poor family was not hungry, was able to obtain medical care when needed.The typical average poor American has more living space in his home than the average (non-poor) European has.

      So really...it's you. And people like you. Buying into the tocsin of doom and gloom in the media that is calculated and designed to make you anxious, make you fearful, and make you pay attention because that's how they sell advertising (or worse, manipulate you in other ways).

      --
      -Styopa
    21. Re:How surprising,... by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've been on this Earth now for almost 59 years. I've seen bad times and good. Some things are better now than they were when I was a child in the 60s and 70s and many are better. Poor people today in the US, and I'm lower middle class, live better than at any time in history. This country has people desperate to come here from places that know what real poverty is. While challenges exist there is no reason to run around screaming the sky is falling. Get a grip!

    22. Re:How surprising,... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The point is that if you're really rich and you have to give half your wealth to your ex-wife/husband, you're still fairly rich. If you're just coping financially and have to give half your wealth to your ex-wife/husband, you're then suddenly poor.

      Exactly. When one person has to give up the house, the car, and the Kids, then their future earnings, and gets to see their children growing in time lapse, well, they might be excused for thinking the system is out to get them, and that suicide is a fine way to opt out of it. That was exactly the case in these societal self-removals.

      If you have 50 million sitting around the house and have to give up 25 million of it, you're still a millionaire. If you are making 100K a year, lose all your investments, And can look forward to paying half of your paycheck to your ex - suddenly you can be looking at not all that much more than minimum wage. That's why it is getting difficult to find people saying "Sign me up!" for that these days.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    23. Re: How surprising,... by F.Ultra · · Score: 3, Informative

      The company does not get money from you buying and selling stocks at the exchange. It's only at the IPO and when they do other issues that they get any money from the stocks.

    24. Re:How surprising,... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      There is no real "left" in the US. your choices are right and far right. with varying degrees of authoritarian.

      https://politicalcompass.org/u...

      Actually no. That is one of those things that can be used by either far left or right to spread FUD. It also paints CLinton as far right while right wingers painted her as socialist.

      Even that article surmised that Old Bernie - Is he right wing? - would have done better than Clinton against Dear Leader. And Trump's actions since taking office include some left wing tactics of protectionism and tariffs .

      So its a nasty hodgepodge of randomicity.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    25. Re:How surprising,... by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right and lets not pretend its not worse than it looks on paper too. A lot of those settlements require transfers of assets and sales of houses or other assets like stocks etc at inopportune times.

      If your stock portfolio is evaluated at 300K and you are ordered to give 150K in cash to your ex you have to liquidate a lot of stocks which may have depreciated but you would otherwise have held on the reasonable assumption the share price would recover. Especially if its stuff you bought as dividend plays, where you don't watch the current price as closely.

      Divorce is about the most economically devastating thing that can happen to someone in the middle class after perhaps some unexpected medical condition arising. Which is really another reason no-fault divorce should NOT be a thing. Neither party to a marriage contract should be permitted to unilaterally bring that kind of destruction on family and still be permitted to run off with half the assets.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    26. Re:How surprising,... by arth1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If your comment here is serious (yes, this is how far sites like SlashDot have sunk), you ought to know that you can reach out for help.

      This attitude is what pisses me off more than anything. The belief that anyone who plans or attempts suicide needs help. That's incredibly condescending, and shows off your cultural bias based on a fairy tale belief that "life is sacred". Sure, some people might have their life changed in one way or another, making suicide no longer their choice. But that still does not make it right. Who are you to say that life is better than no life for others? Do you say the same about being hetero being better than being gay too? It's really the same type of condescending "moral" view that people want to enforce on others.

      If someone wants to die, that should be their right. If we cannot even be allowed to own the decision about our own death, and don't own our own bodies, we are slaves.

    27. Re: How surprising,... by Hussman32 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except the stats don't back up the 'sky is falling' position...the world is much better now than ever before. And it is much better for the poor than it was before.

      I, for one, don't miss polio, small pox, massive deaths in wars, and a lack of access to information.

      Leftist, centrist, rightist...the one thing they all have in common is they are pessimists. Put on some Louis Armstrong, enjoy the sun, and then make the world even better for the future.

       

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
    28. Re:How surprising,... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Suicide is a luxury of the well to do. When all you value is wealth, and that is taken from you, of course you're prone to depression and driven to suicide.

      Life is a struggle, those that live in struggle understand this, and are able to cope. People who have never struggled don't understand that this world is brutal and nobody gets out alive. They don't have the skills needed to survive the struggle, and the world eats those people first.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    29. Re:How surprising,... by eepok · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have to remember that it has always been a political tactic of those seeking to gain power to convince people that things are worse than ever and they're only getting worse. With modern communication giving a platform to all dissenters, one would tend to assume that such a mass of people saying the same thing over and over would be correct.

      Yes, the gap between the rich and not-rich is widening and has been widening for the last 40 years, but the poorest are still living better than the poorest did 40 years ago. On the whole, the quality of life for the vast majority of people in American has gone way up, but a some people are doing even better.

      Where I think the activists don't really really fail is describing the effective class contract between the mega-rich and the less-well-off.

      "We work unpreferable jobs with little job satisfaction so you can get rich. All we ask for in return is a livable wage so that we do not go hungry, we can afford safe housing, and so that our towns can afford good infrastructure and schools."

      Were they able to consistently describe such a contract, they would then be able to say, "Since the 1970s, the rich have strayed from this agreement. It is time they return."

    30. Re:How surprising,... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Informative

      America has been plunging into debt (not slowly) since Vietnam.

      The rate of debt growth in the US grew at about the same rate from WWII to 1980 (the Vietnam war ended in 1975). It wasn't "plunging". It didn't start to explode until Ronald Reagan took office. If you want to point to a cause of national debt, you can point to trickle-down economics, which has been the US flavor of late-stage capitalism since 1980 through today. Supply side doesn't work. It was voodoo then, and it's voodoo now.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    31. Re: How surprising,... by shaitand · · Score: 2

      Lets stop talking about the 1% because the 1% includes engineers, doctors, and people who work for a living. We are really talking about the .1% or even .01% who contribute nothing but loaning us back the interest they charged us last week. It baffles me, if we need to build a road and there is a building in the way we use imminent domain in the interest of the public but erasing the wealth of a tiny fraction of population smaller than would be impacted by tearing down that building and doubling the value of all wealth held by 99.9% of the population instantly we consider it "evil"

    32. Re:How surprising,... by eaglesrule · · Score: 2

      The right to end one's life on their own terms is an essential liberty that should not be denied. But every attempt should be made to ensure that it is a decision based out of conviction from sound mind, and not impaired judgement due to mental illness or extreme duress. Since the AC provided no reason, there is no basis for attacking someone who only merely offers valid advice and showed a bit of concern for their fellow human being.

      Why? Because many people who attempt suicide go on to live normal lives after receiving assistance or their circumstances change, and become thankful they did not succeed. It has nothing to do with imposed moral values. The person who offered the advice may have known such a person, or even be one themselves.

      If someone doesn't want to be bothered by such normal reactions of concern, they shouldn't broadcast their decision in public.

    33. Re:How surprising,... by organgtool · · Score: 2

      I'd argue they're full of shit, that depression - a condition characterized by lethargy and an unwillingness to take risks - is the brain's way of preventing you (well, discouraging you) from committing suicide, which is why the two are correlated - people who aren't considering killing themselves or otherwise doing something self destructive are in no need of that self defense mechanism.

      While I normally agree with your posts and I do agree with everything in the beginning of this post, I vehemently disagree with the quoted portion above. Based on your characterization of clinical depression, I can't imagine you've ever been through it. If I understand your argument, you make it seem as if thoughts of suicide induce depression as a defense mechanism in an attempt to make you too lazy to kill yourself. That characterization of the disease is so far divorced from reality that I feel I have to address it so that no one reads your statement and adopts that mindset.

      Clinical depression has to be one of the most misunderstood diseases among people not involved in the medical field. It causes a chemical imbalance, often characterized by a lower availability of neurotransmitters such as serotonin, which are necessary to help your brain experience emotions. While the most notable side effect is the inability to experience happiness, at its peak it can dull all of your emotions, including negative emotions, leaving you to feel like a robot.

      In addition to serotonin, dopamine is another neurotransmitter that can be reduced during a depression. Dopamine is associated with the reward center of the brain and its effects have been well studied inside and outside of the medical field. For instance, casinos are designed to release as much dopamine as possible in gamblers to keep them motivated to put more money into gaming. Now imagine I injected one of these gamblers with a substance that prevented the production or uptake of dopamine. They would have absolutely no motivation at all to continue gambling, or do much of anything else for that matter. That is very much what happens for many people who suffer from depression - absolutely nothing provides a rewarding experience, no matter how great the outcome or how little the effort. It's not necessarily rooted in pessimism, it's just completely impossible for someone to experience reward or happiness if they temporarily lack the chemicals necessary to transmit those feelings.

      After dealing with that for months at a time, many people feel like they will never be capable of experiencing happiness or rewarding experiences again, so they take their lives. Therefore, the depression causes suicide, not the other way around. Fortunately, for many people the chemical imbalance resolves itself within six months but every second of a depression feels like an eternity when there is absolutely nothing that provides you with even a moderate amount of satisfaction.

      Anyway, I hope that clears up some misconceptions about depression and helps provide a better understanding of what it does to a person's mental state.

  2. And "diseases" of despair. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Alcoholism and other drug abuse. Numb out enough and the body gives out. There's a huge problem with that in areas of the country that have been in economic decline.

    1. Re:And "diseases" of despair. by sheramil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do you think alcohol and drug use is so rampant? It's not the cause, it's an effect.

      The world is an MMO, and less people see any point in continuing to play if it's set up so that they can't have any fun at all, much less win.

    2. Re:And "diseases" of despair. by bickerdyke · · Score: 5, Funny

      Stupid grinding, but the graphics are incredible!

      --
      bickerdyke
    3. Re:And "diseases" of despair. by Sumus+Semper+Una · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, but it's pay2win and the griefers are rampant, creating a toxic experience. Looks like a lot of people are abandoning it.

  3. Many more types of suicide not counted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a former drug addict I can tell you from first hand experience many drug-heads are suicidal who are too timid to commit real suicide - so they choose the alternative --- drug themselves until they forget their pain

    I guess a lot of alcoholics are in similar circumstance as well

    Officially those who died of OD or those who drank themselves to death are not counted as suicide --- and they should be

  4. Hmmm... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 5, Informative
    A quick check of older data shows that suicide rates, even though up 30% since the turn of the century, are about the same as a century ago.

    And well below the peak 90 years ago.

    Well below where it was 110 years ago, for that matter.

    Note that the previous peak corresponded with the beginning of the Great Depression. Not really sure what was happening 110 or so years ago to cause a bounce in suicide rates - it overlapped with WW1, but got started well before then....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re:Hmmm... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The financial crisis is really taking a toll on people. It's not wonder they are turning to populists and anyone who promises to fix things.

      What's interesting is that relatively speaking the US came out of the crash fairly quickly. Countries like the UK that went the austerity route are still well below 2008 levels for things like wages and quality of life. Where the US differs is that there are fewer safety nets. If you lose you lose big time and can very quickly end up with nothing and little hope of recovery.

      Also, people in the US have access to guns and less emergency mental healthcare, so suicide attempts are more likely to succeed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Hmmm... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Let me have a stab at it.

      Life was shit, social mobility was practically non-existent, the poor had to work insanely hard and had no rights while rich people had all the rights and only got richer, and there was basically no social security at all beyond what you and your family could provide. You know, the kind of dystopia we seem to be headed for with the speed of light today? The dream age of every libertard out there.

      And yet, before that peak 110-odd years back, suicide rate was lower than now (roughly comparable to 1999 levels). And afterwards, likewise.

      What changed to cause that peak? What changed to cause that peak to go away?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re:Hmmm... by atrex · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure that all of the US really came out of the crash. Certainly the stock market, the banks, corporations, and the rich came out of it. But it seems like a lot of the general populous got left behind to foot the bill. Taxpayer money used to bail out the banks, taxpayer money used to bail out the motor industry. And none of those bankers got prosecuted or served a day in jail. Thousands, millions of people lost their homes during the mortgage crisis. Health insurance and health care costs rising year over year by sometimes as much as 40% or more.

      I hear some work place insurance plans have already started forcing everyone to take a full physical and are going to start adjusting policy prices on a per worker basis based on an individual's risk factors. Made a few unhealthy lifestyle choices? You're going to pay more. Have high risk of cancer in your family? You're going to pay more. Been to the doctor too often recently? You're going to pay more.

      I wouldn't be surprised if suicide rates continue to rise until there's almost no one left for the rich to feed off of.

    4. Re:Hmmm... by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      The whole developed world has underfunded the baby boom's retirement. There are exceptions, but they're rare.

      In the USA we've taken the SS trust fund off book, but are requiring dying government agencies (e.g. the post office) to fund their employee retirements. In England they've taken _all_ government retirement funds off book.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  5. Talk about male privilege by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to the CDC more than 3/4 of suicides are men, yet the article makes it all about women. Do you feel privileged yet?

    1. Re:Talk about male privilege by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      I actually think that this has to do with the gradual erosion of male values. Men seem increasingly unnecessary and vilified, male employment has taken a serious downturn, husbands/fathers are less societally respected, and the sexual market of old (goodJob->getGirl->getMarried->haveSex) is now nearly entirely vanished (gotoBar->Gamechicks->haveSex). I feel like it is gradually turning to a winner-takes-all system where the top 20% of men get the majority of both money and women. On an individual level, this means "OMG, get in the top 20% immediately!", but it means that the majority of men are getting locked out for resources (money/women) and left with nothing.

      I am a young professional scientist and the *majority* of my male colleagues (PhD scientists in their early 30s!) are unmarried non-churchGoers frustrated in the sexual/family market. It is truly crazy to think that a 6-figure salary and a doctorate cannot attract a wife in the current market, and that they go home lonely each night. NOTE - I am not immune to these trends, and I am on my second wife (first wife left me for a drummer in a band... which is also crazy to think), and seriously contemplated suicide in my first divorce (called the hotline... don't call the hotline).

      Essentially, men are unmooring into the ocean. Limited religious participation, erosion of the typical husband/wife structure (through divorce, the pill, family court structure, etc.), and lower overall participation in the workforce (no longer a preReq for sex, increased competition). This pretty quickly puts men into a "no money, no family, no one that cares about me, no reason to live" rationale.

      Sad analysis:
      https://dalrock.wordpress.com/...

      I really feel like someone needs to do something about it - but there are so many incentives lined up against it that I have no idea what to do. Locally, I started/ran a mens group, where these issues came up pretty commonly.

    2. Re:Talk about male privilege by Cederic · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the UK there's also a sizeable funding issue. The government spends more on 'violence against women and girls' than it does on suicide prevention/support, even though men are 25 times more likely to kill themselves than a woman.

      In divorce cases women can get legal aid; men can not.

      In domestic violence situations there are hundreds of refuges funded for women. Very few in the whole country for men. Funding for domestic violence is almost all targeted towards helping female victims too, and at least one of the national domestic violence charities assumes men are abusers (and is demanding gendered legislation to provide protections to women but not men).

      That's before you look at the gender imbalances in the justice system and the family courts, the impossibility for men to interact with women without risking a charge of harassment, the demands that men should show emotion combined with criticism when they do, the suspicion men face when alone with children, the constant barrage of media hatred towards masculinity..

      It's no wonder some men are struggling to cope.

  6. 1999 data point is cherry picked by Solandri · · Score: 5, Informative

    The long-term suicide rate for the U.S. has fluctuated between about 10-14 per 100,000 over the last 40 years. 1999 was just the minimum, which the reporter cherry picked to try to turn this into a story. It's been higher in the past.

    Also, suicide rates have been climbing up throughout the world, not just in the U.S. Curiously, homicide rates also stopped the long-term decline around 2010 and started creeping up again. So average global temperature may actually be linked (violence and higher temperatures have been correlated in the past). But nobody really knows for sure why, and anyone who claims they do is just trying to spin the story to fit their preconceptions.

  7. CDC itself contributes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As the CDC itself issued 'guidelines' to essentially force doctors to stop giving opioid drugs even to people with chronic pain illnesses and conditions, many of these people are giving up and killing themselves because of the pain.

    This report isn't the CDC soberly discussing a disturbing trend. They're bragging at how effectively they themselves are helping cull people from the Social Security and disability payments lists, thus helping their government masters kick the can down the road a bit more.

    When the CDC sticks to actual infectious disease, they're some of the best. Anything else, they're one of the evilest parts of the whole fucking federal government.

    1. Re:CDC itself contributes by swb · · Score: 2

      So the CDC is stuck between a rock and a hard place.

      There's very little serious infectious disease in the US, and those diseases that remain are low-level and stubborn to eliminate. They can chase short-term outbreaks (E. Coli and other food-borne pathogens) and predict potential apocalypse from new pandemics, but other than that they're forced to redefine non-pathogenic problems as "public health crises" and suggest social engineering solutions.

    2. Re:CDC itself contributes by Ryanrule · · Score: 3, Insightful

      opioids are shit for long term pain. you just want your heroin fix.

  8. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A quick check of older data shows that suicide rates, even though up 30% since the turn of the century, are about the same as a century ago.

    And well below the peak 90 years ago.

    So, it's regressing to the mean - big deal, right?

    This isn't some natural phenomena that just happens. These are people making the choice to off themselves. The suicide rate should be going to zero.

    And the fact that it's going back up is indicative of some underlying problem that shouldn't be ignored.

  9. Sense, meaning and enthusiasm are essential by Qbertino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sense and enthusiasm are essential for a happy life. In a world transitioning though cyberpunk into post-scarcity faster than any science fiction writer could've ever imagined, sense, meaning and enthusiasm are constantly upended and revised.

    These are not easy times. I was suicidal for a bit 6 years back. Luckily I though about what that would do to my daughter and pulled myself out of my rut of over-emphasised self-importance that often is the cause of 1st world depression and went to work to be useful to my loved ones. I bounced back pretty quick and once again these days life is awesome again. Best sex ever, neat job, webdev in high demand and - most importantly - I'm more resilient and prepared for the next slump and emotional downer.

    I recommend stoicism as a life philosophy. Get's you though tough times very neatly and helps you focus on the real things. No religion needed.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  10. "We suffer more in imagination ... by Qbertino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... than in realtiy." - Seneca

    "You can make yourself miserable or you can make yourself happy. The amount of effort is the same." - Carlos Castaneda

    Stoicism. Beats religion and any other philosophy any time, hands down.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:"We suffer more in imagination ... by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

      Sarcasm beats stoicism hands down.

    2. Re:"We suffer more in imagination ... by houghi · · Score: 2

      I beat sarcasts down with my hands.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  11. They forgot a reason by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 2

    Veterans are killing themselves in significant numbers.

    Likely due to the persistent conflicts the US has participated in since Desert Storm kicked off in the 90's.

  12. Come on guys! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    If we try really hard, I'm sure we can get that up to 100%!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  13. Dude, you're killing me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    From the results of your own link:

    Analyses at the community level are significantly more likely to demonstrate lower rates of suicide among higher socio-economic areas than studies using larger areas of aggregation. Measures of area poverty and deprivation are most likely to be inversely associated with suicide rates and median income is least likely to be inversely associated with suicide rates. Analyses using measures of unemployment and education and occupation were equally likely to demonstrate inverse associations.

    And the Conclusion:

    Resources for suicide prevention should be targeted to high poverty/deprivation and high unemployment areas.

  14. Social Engineering by jamlam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We've spent the last 50 years "deconstructing the pillars of society" that pretty much everyone adhered to up until then. As an engineer, I'm wondering if anyone ever checked to see what they were holding up.

  15. um, no by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

    This doesn't change the fact that clinical depression is the chief driver of suicide.

    Most of us cling tenaciously to life, no matter how much things suck. We all have negative things happen to us; most of us do not react by taking to our beds or deciding that everything is hopeless. It's not the external event; it's the resilience against it. (A good popular work on this is Against Depression, by Peter Kramer.)

    As others have pointed out, suicide rates were higher 90 years ago.

    Stop trying to make everything about politics.

  16. It is / was their decistion. by Blinkin1200 · · Score: 2

    You should respect their wishes.

  17. Re:Social cost by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    Another thought.. recent Slashdot article indicating there are more open jobs then people to fill them, yet many comments indicating that it is still a struggle out there. That's kind of a brain fuck in itself.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  18. The Total Perspective Vortex by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Douglas Adams wrote for the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy Radio Series (First) About this torture device called the Total Perspective Vortex. Which simply showed your place in the universe. Causing the victim to die a painful death, on realizing how insignificant they are in the perspective of the entire universe.

    I expect a similar and much smaller scale effect is happening with access to the internet, and a flood of 24 hour news showing how tiny you are, and how little impact that you are doing to anything is depressing.

    Back before all this or when it just started. You could be the big man in your town, the Sports Star, the business owner, the guy with a Masters or a Doctorate. Your society as relatively small, events outside you world were shown in small doses often censored to keep up with your sensibilities. Sure you may get called off to War, but you knew you part of the good guys. There are complex problems, we knew they were "Egg Heads" working on them and their solutions will fix things. But you knew your place in the world, chances are you are doing better then your parents, you have stuff that society says that you should have. You feel good about yourself.

    Now being the local expert isn't a big deal, because anyone will google the answer, or watch the real pros play. Local news is mostly limited to the Weather and Traffic. All the problems of the world have half of the people blaming you/your ideals/your life style as the problem. The so called Experts show they don't have as a full grasp as you believed and can only do so much....

    For me to find meaning in my life, I often need to cut myself off from the media. just because it is too much.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.