Slashdot Mirror


Chinese City Gets 'Smartphone Zombie' Walkway (bbc.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: A city in northern China has introduced a special pedestrian lane on one of its roads, exclusively for slow-walking smartphone users, it's reported. According to the Shaanxi Online News, the pavement along the Yanta Road in Xi'an has now got itself a special lane for "phubbers" -- people who stare at their phones and ignore everything else around them. The lane is painted red, green and blue, and is 80cm wide and 100m long. Pictures of smartphones along the route distinguish it from an ordinary pedestrian lane. Shaanxi Online says that a large shopping mall, which looks onto the street, had been pushing to have the lane for a month. It says that cars often come onto the pavement, which is a busy channel for pedestrians who might not be paying attention to their surroundings. News website The Paper interviewed locals, who welcomed the introduction of the lane. Wei Xiaowei said it was the first time he had seen such a thing and said he thought it was "pretty good." "Everybody walking along here thinks that it's very safe; at the side of the road, there are cars, and the vehicles also come onto here, and sometimes only just avoid you."

55 comments

  1. What a time by TJHook3r · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...to be alive! Sometimes I wonder if I'm living in a slightly rubbish cyberpunk novel!

    1. Re: What a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more like an Orwellian nightmare were the Ministry of Truth can change a controlled demolition into a terror attack. ae911truth org

      They can even turn an illegal spy operation into a Russia "investigation", like the FBI did with Stefan Halper. :P

    2. Re: What a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok buddy we said we would only give you 10 minutes of internet a day if you take your meds.

    3. Re:What a time by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      This is the cyberpunk we deserve.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    4. Re:What a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slightly rubbish?

    5. Re:What a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a really stupid thing to do! People need to put down their phones and pay attention to where they are going and their surroundings whether driving or walking!

  2. I give it 30 seconds by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

    before it's clogged with electric bikes and scooters, like a lot of sidewalks in China...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:I give it 30 seconds by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Depends where it is... Electric scooters and rental bikes are everywhere in Fuzhou. I saw a guy riding one, with a woman on the back, and phone in hand. His horn must have been broken because he was using a horn app on his phone to shoo people out of his way as he rode through a shopping centre.

      In Guangzhou they are rare. It's all cars and the pedestrian areas are safe except for phone zombies.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:I give it 30 seconds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who uses a horn to shoo people out of the way should be shot. Or hung. Any form of public execution really.

    3. Re:I give it 30 seconds by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Down here on Huanshi East Road and Luhu - right in the heart of Guangzhou - there are plenty of scooters and bikes on the sidewalks. At least that's how it's been these last 7 days...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    4. Re:I give it 30 seconds by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I was only there for a few days, maybe I avoided the bad areas.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:I give it 30 seconds by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      So all cars should be banned?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    6. Re:I give it 30 seconds by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Anyone who uses a horn to shoo people out of the way should be shot. Or hung. Any form of public execution really.

      The car horn is probably the worst invention of all time. It's supposed to be used in emergencies- but what it's really used for is a way to make your car say expletives. I suspect the car horn has killed more people (by startling them and making them crash) than it has saved lives.

      Can't we do away with all the pretense in this modern day? Instead of a car horn, can't we have a button that plays a recording of "f you asshole" out of a loud speaker?

      It does what the current car horn does in expressing opinion, but is less likely to startle a driver into running off the road.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    7. Re:I give it 30 seconds by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Ahhh... I lived in Shanghai for 6 years, and for the last 6 I've been over here (like now) for 4-5 months each year, 2-4 weeks at a time! Oh well... It's really gotten much more crowded as the economy in GZ has grown even faster (and Dongguan as well, that's a huge boomtown), so it's gotten worse in terms of use of sidewalks and such. This is right in the center of downtown.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    8. Re:I give it 30 seconds by Unhappy+Windows+User · · Score: 1

      Well hung.

    9. Re:I give it 30 seconds by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I thought that's where we went, down town by the British embassy and north of that around some big shopping centres and the Tesla showroom. Then along by the river too. I'm not very familiar with the place.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:I give it 30 seconds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, ban non emergency use of the car horn. It is not there to shoo people out of the way, nor to punish someone for a mistake that has already been made. It is only intended for use to PREVENT an emergency from occurring. Instead, it is commonly used as an ego-maniacal way to manipulate others through fear.

    11. Re:I give it 30 seconds by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      The car horn is probably the worst invention of all time. It's supposed to be used in emergencies-

      No it's not. It's meant to get someones attention. I don't recall which state, but within the last couple decades they still had it on the books that you were required to honk your horn when approaching a Y in the road to make sure everyone else knew you were approaching.

      but what it's really used for is a way to make your car say expletives. I suspect the car horn has killed more people (by startling them and making them crash) than it has saved lives.

      Ten years ago I probably would have agreed with you. But in the last 2 or so years the only thing I've used my horn for has been to get the person ahead of me to look up from their phone to move because the light turned green.

      In my case, I'm going to have to say the horn has saved lives. Because if I didn't have a horn, I would have had to get out of my car to get them to move. At that point, it would have been a public service to beat them to death.

    12. Re:I give it 30 seconds by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      The car horn is probably the worst invention of all time. It's supposed to be used in emergencies-

      This is somewhat state dependent. I just did some looking. In Virginia, New Jersey, and Rhode Island legally you are supposed to honk your horn before passing someone.

    13. Re:I give it 30 seconds by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      The car horn is probably the worst invention of all time. It's supposed to be used in emergencies-

      This is somewhat state dependent. I just did some looking. In Virginia, New Jersey, and Rhode Island legally you are supposed to honk your horn before passing someone.

      That must make for a very musical interstate.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    14. Re:I give it 30 seconds by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      I live in a country where there are laws against using your phone while driving (even if you are stationary) and I live in a city in that country that has passed by-laws which give them the right to confiscate your phone until you pay the fine. Still happens all the time of course, but I have lived in most major cities here and it does not happen as often where I am now. Personally my social circle is clearly a lot smaller than most people, I hate having WhatsApp etc. on my phone, but work uses it, and the wife uses it so...

      When I get home at night and don't have to make sure I am available (for whatever reason) the phone goes on silent. I will catch up on all the messages the next day, if you really need to get hold of me you would have my wife's number, and she never goes anywhere without her phone (unlike me, I frequently take the dogs for a walk without my phone).

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    15. Re:I give it 30 seconds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are you from where non-emergency use is *not* banned?

  3. let darwin work, ffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    if people can't be bothered to look where they're going and instead are staring at a screen, let nature take its course.

    1. Re: let darwin work, ffs by orlanz · · Score: 2

      Would you say the same if cars just rode up on sidewalks in the US. There was a time in history when this used to happen and we blamed the pedestrians; but we didn't really have curbs then.

      I think that's the real problem for them. They let drivers get up on the side and blame the pedestrians for not paying attention. I guess this special lane is supposed to set the expectation that the walkers won't be blamed.

    2. Re: let darwin work, ffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Chinese cities were not planned to include the massive volume of cars. Buildings rarely have parking garages and most apartment complexes over 10 years old used to have parks, now they paved over them for parking.

      Plus its an easy way for that ayi to scream at you for ¥2 to park on the sidewalk.

      Most newer developed areas DO include garages and limited parking, but you have to buy them, which most people who can barely afford the house can do... so they park anywhere.

  4. Headline by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... and it leads to a meat grinder.

    --
    I tend to rant.
    1. Re:Headline by SciCom+Luke · · Score: 1

      We should be so lucky

    2. Re:Headline by bobby · · Score: 1

      I was just about to post: It leads to a building, and Soylent Green comes out the other end.

    3. Re:Headline by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      That meat grinder is only turned on every other day, so they have a good sporting chance.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    4. Re:Headline by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Soylent green is 'Smartphone Zombies'... IT'S PEOPLE!

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re:Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except smart phones end up grinded too. Maybe Soylent green + "It's people! Now with extra palladium!"

  5. REINSTATE SELECTIVE SERVICE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring! Back! The! Draft!

    Mobilize! Prepare for the CAN-AM wars! We will be triTrumpant!

  6. Simple solution: "law and order" by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    Announce that within 90 days, a new law will go into effect that does the following:

    1. Releases drivers from any civil liability if they take reasonable steps to not hit a pedestrian who violates traffic laws as a result of being on a mobile device.
    2. Makes distracted pedestrians liable for vehicle damage and any emotional trauma that is caused to a driver who hits them in compliance with point #1.
    3. Allows for the felony prosecution of any distracted pedestrian who causes harm to drivers because they swerve to avoid them and collide with something.

    1. Re:Simple solution: "law and order" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL they don't even enforce the current laws.

    2. Re:Simple solution: "law and order" by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I suspect the article is using the British meaning of pavement, which is the exact opposite of yours.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Simple solution: "law and order" by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      4. Never oppose a PRC officer.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:Simple solution: "law and order" by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Tell me about it. Last time I was there, I saw a perpetual motion machine that worked.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  7. Layout examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  8. Most of the hate is undeserved by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

    I used to read books while walking down the street. (on sidewalks) My attention and peripheral vision was more than sufficient that I never stepped over a curb or walked in front of traffic, but I still had people shout at me out of cars. Because I never jaywalked I know the real problem they had wasn't that I was unsafe but that I seemed unsafe. I think a lot of people are that way with people on cell phones. He's on a cell phone, is he going to walk in front of me? And they project their anxiety onto the other party where it does not belong. I'm responsible for my behavior. If I actually behave unsafely that's on me. Otherwise stop trying to regulate me.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:Most of the hate is undeserved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      >I'm responsible for my behavior. If I actually behave unsafely that's on me. Otherwise stop trying to regulate me.

      Until that one time where you step onto the road and a driver can't stop in time not to hit you. Or actually does manage to slam on the brakes fast enough, only to get rear-ended by the guy behind him. Now the driver has to prove to the insurance company that you stepped out onto the road unexpectedly. Good luck with that.

    2. Re:Most of the hate is undeserved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, this is an example of why the oft quoted 'Your right to swing your fist ends at my nose' is wrong.

      In reality, your right to swing your fist ends a couple of feet away from my nose, as I don't have the luxury of waiting to find out your true intentions, and have to act accordingly.

    3. Re:Most of the hate is undeserved by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      So if I have anxiety, and I assume someone is about to hit me so I dive into the ditch is that their fault?

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    4. Re:Most of the hate is undeserved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, man. Absolutely.

      This is the same mentality that lead my grandmother to reading the bible as she mowed the lawn with the riding mower. She was convinced she could run the mower just as well while reading. Until the day she slammed into the house at full speed and busted herself up.

      What the fuck is so difficult about paying attention to what you're doing when you're in public? Driving? Drive. Walking? Walk. Riding a bicycle? Ride. And PAY. THE FUCK. ATTENTION!

      It should not be everyone else's responsibility to watch out for some dumbshit that thinks they're able to read, put on makeup, write their thesis, or whatever other bullshit they are doing while driving/walking/cycling. Just concentrate on the task at hand. Save your stupid multi-tasking rituals for when your at home trying to cut veggies while reading. Lose a thumb? Oops! Maybe you weren't so good at multi-tasking after all, but at least nobody will get blamed for it but you in that case.

  9. Deja Vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't we have this exact same fake news about a year ago? The next week everyone was backpedaling over how this wasn't actually happening.

  10. Helmet fires by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My attention and peripheral vision was more than sufficient that I never stepped over a curb or walked in front of traffic, but I still had people shout at me out of cars.

    What about the people around you who had to needlessly maneuver around you? I don't buy the argument that you were able to adequately pay attention to what was going on around you at all times.

    I think a lot of people are that way with people on cell phones. He's on a cell phone, is he going to walk in front of me? And they project their anxiety onto the other party where it does not belong. I'm responsible for my behavior. If I actually behave unsafely that's on me. Otherwise stop trying to regulate me.

    Your argument might have merit if people were actually good at paying attention to multiple things at once. It's called task saturation though I like the term pilots use which is "helmet fire". It is a FACT that people cannot talk on a phone and give their full attention to other tasks. It sounds simple enough but it actually task saturates most people and they start making mistakes unintentionally. The reason it is dangerous to talk on a cell phone and drive is that your brain physically cannot cope with doing both at the same time. Same thing applies to pedestrians. They literally cannot task switch between talking and navigating fast enough.

  11. How about a lane for driving phubbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens when a walking phubber meets a driving phubber? Phubb phubb phubb.

  12. Whiz Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you wise to trust strangers to not run over you? It's foolish if you ask me. (but you weren't asking me - yeah I know)

  13. Reference, I think? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  14. I like this idea... by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    It keeps the slowest traffic off to the side, and if you trip into somebody walking slowly because they're on their phone, they've got no excuse.

  15. That's what they did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's exactly what they did: they let nature take its course. But that involves people asking to make a dangerous thing safer. This let-nature-take-its-course strategy is why your have airbags in your car, random strangers who make your food sometimes occasionally get inspected, you have a DO NOT EAT warning on that packet of desiccant, and Windows users have a broad expectation that it's totally ok for them to run whatever malware it strikes their fancy to run as long as they have a virus scanner which can mostly delete it later. Apparently nature has humans in it! Stupid nature.

  16. Just lining 'em up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the kill. Now the vehicle has the best path to follow for the most points clearly marked!

  17. Welcome to Zombie Alley by lolococo · · Score: 1

    In soviet China, zombies phone you!

  18. Stupid by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    Instead of promoting this, add extra poles so people who aren't watching where they're going walk into them.. People should stop using the smartphone so much out in the public streets, have seen too many accidents already because people walked through red-lights while being busy with their smartphones (and I don't give a rat's ass if they die because of it, just don't be such a moron).

  19. Next Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL! The next headline will be:

    "Epidemic of Concussions and Smashed Phones Occurring at Yanta Road in Xi'an!"

    OK, that's too long for a real headline, but you get the idea.