Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Details Secret 'Pocketable' Surface Device (theverge.com)

Microsoft's mysterious new Surface device, codenamed Andromeda, that's been in development for the past two years is going to be pocketable, reports The Verge. The company says it will create a "new and disruptive" device category to influence the overall Surface roadmap and blur the lines between what's considered PC and mobile. From the report: "It's a new pocketable Surface device form factor that brings together innovative new hardware and software experiences to create a truly personal and versatile computing experience," is exactly how Microsoft describes the device internally. The Andromeda device is still being developed in secrecy inside Microsoft, with a wraparound display that bridges the gap of the hinge when it's fully opened. We understand current engineering samples of the pocketable Surface look identical to the 3D concept created by David Breyer.

Microsoft has also been experimenting with stylus input for Andromeda, so that the device can fold over like a book and a pen can be used to capture digital ink. Microsoft is also experimenting with ARM processors inside prototype Andromeda devices. Microsoft views Andromeda as a unique response to its failures with Windows Phone devices. "It will blur the lines between mobile and stationary computing," reads one internal document describing the device. Microsoft is tentatively planning to release Andromeda in 2018, with similar devices from some of Microsoft's top OEMs to "follow afterwards."

92 comments

  1. Whatâ(TM)s in my pocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my dilzzzzzzzzzz

  2. blur the lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMO it'll only blur the lines if it has a 400W power brick that you're supposed to carry around in your other pocket, and a 24" IPS monitor that you lug around on your back.

  3. Ouch by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    "Surface" is what used to be IE for a long time, that eventually became "edge". Surface? They better chose a different name if that device is really going to be "new and disruptive".

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Sure-feces?

    2. Re:Ouch by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

      "Surfait" in French would fit nicely.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  4. Give this thing a chance by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

    Make it able to run Linux.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:Give this thing a chance by zeiche · · Score: 1

      Make it able to run Linux.

      If Microsoft implements NT on the ARM device, there is a good chance it could run a Linux environment as Windows 10 does today.

    2. Re:Give this thing a chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if theyre assholes and lock the bootloader like they did with windows rt tablets. The only reason we could run other operating systems on those tablets is because someone found a flaw in the bootloader. Actually who am I kidding, they are assholes. microsoft has never respected booting into other operating systems. even on a pc which is open, the windows disk tools will wipe any other bootloader you have on the hard drive and replace it with its own so it only boots into windows.

      The windows will probably be locked to only install and run stuff from the windows store too.

    3. Re:Give this thing a chance by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      No, he's talking about the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) where you can run several Linux distros, unmodified and without virtualization, on top of the NT kernel. No bootloader modification required.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    4. Re:Give this thing a chance by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      But why the foundation? Get rid of that NT kernel, it's a superfluous element, one more potential point of failure without any benefit.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Give this thing a chance by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Android locked down and running Microsoft Services still counts as Linux... right? LOL

    6. Re:Give this thing a chance by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      But why the foundation? Get rid of that NT kernel, it's a superfluous element, one more potential point of failure without any benefit.

      Yes, right until you get to the part where the Linux kernel will need dedicated drivers for it, a key reason why in the mobile ROM world it is so hard to simply play with whatever OS you want.

      Having a working kernel doesn't seem so superfluous.

    7. Re:Give this thing a chance by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      Then go full Linux. This option is for those who don't want to give up Windows.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    8. Re: Give this thing a chance by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Nope, it's for people who want a linux working environment, on an abstracted hardware layer so all the drivers can remain the responsibility of Windows. So all those closed off bits of hardware in the mobile device market are available to you.

    9. Re: Give this thing a chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, EEE! Embrace, Extend, Extinguish. If Microsoft can get Linux to stop worrying about driver support, it can erode driver support to the point of not competing on the Desktop. Probably not going to happen, but doesn't mean Microsoft ain't trying.

    10. Re:Give this thing a chance by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I don't know anyone who doesn't want to give up Windows for the kernel. People who cling to Windows usually do so for the UI.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:Give this thing a chance by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      Feel free to ask Microsoft to build the opposite of WSL, so that Windows can run on top of a Linux kernel. I'd use it.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  5. M$ just invented a cellphone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With copyright patents going back to 1955. Next up... Massive copyright lawsuits.

    1. Re:M$ just invented a cellphone... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      A very small laptop with a flip lid. A Dolphin 6110 device but from M$?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:M$ just invented a cellphone... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Nobody said that this is going to make phone calls, or did I miss something?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:M$ just invented a cellphone... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Like the old Psion handheld I used to have.

      It didn't have graphics, but it ran Perl so who cares?

      I'm sure it will exceed my expectations, this being Microsoft. Right? RIght?!?!?

    4. Re:M$ just invented a cellphone... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Nobody said that this is going to make phone calls, or did I miss something?

      Nobody is going to carry another device in their pocket next to their phone. A few nerds did that for a while, and then we got smartphones and they stopped — even though it's arguably a good idea to separate the computing device from the communications device, for security reasons. It's not a good enough reason to have kept that market segment alive, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:M$ just invented a cellphone... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      A new Dauphin DTR-1 with Windows 10 :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:M$ just invented a cellphone... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Just because it doesn't make sense doesn't mean MS ain't gonna do it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. Is it not a phone then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like a phone without a phone in it. A flip not-a-phone! This could easily be as big as Zune.

    1. Re:Is it not a phone then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard it's going to be called "Clippy".

    2. Re:Is it not a phone then? by RandomFactor · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "Flippy"

      --
      --- Mercutio was right.
    3. Re:Is it not a phone then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "Flippy"

      "It looks as though you want to make a phone call! Please wait while I bring up Skype."

  7. Close, but probably not quite right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just want something that is otherwise like a smartphone but runs Linux instead of Android.

    If Microsoft hadn't shown such total contempt for their customers in the last few years, I'd have wanted it to run Windows instead.

    1. Re:Close, but probably not quite right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck a goat instead - you'll get more pleasure.

    2. Re: Close, but probably not quite right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But put its hooves in your boots first, then it aint goin nowhere

  8. Pocketable Device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surface Phone? Perhaps?

  9. like an iPod touch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    copied

  10. "new and disruptive by hduff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Like the Zune?

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    1. Re:"new and disruptive by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      It can now squirt data files too. Not just DRM music.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:"new and disruptive by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

      No. Like the Kin.

    3. Re:"new and disruptive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say what you will, I still use my Zune daily, never replaced the battery, and it's been dropped on concrete and hardwood floors more times than I can count. I can't say the same about any other MP3 players I've ever owned.

    4. Re:"new and disruptive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > it's been dropped on concrete and hardwood floors more times than I can count
      > I can't say the same about any other MP3 players I've ever owned

      Why do you abuse the poor Zune so?

  11. Buy a Mac by Chibouki · · Score: 1, Insightful

    i hate it when Slashdot editors fall into marketing BS. Innovative new hardware and software experiences? Wow, buy a Mac.

    1. Re:Buy a Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They almost bought into the innovative vapourware

    2. Re: Buy a Mac by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      It isn't 1986 anymore. The Mac isn't innovative.

    3. Re: Buy a Mac by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 1

      LOL, well buy a mac at the apple store and a surface at the MS store and use both for the 2-4 weeks you can and return the one you hate the most...

      --
      Your Average Joe
    4. Re: Buy a Mac by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Where do I go to buy a 'pocketable' Mac that runs a real operating system? The only choice for that size of gadget from Apple continues to run a toy operating system.

  12. Blurred lines by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They still don't get it, which is frankly quite the feat.

    We don't want mobiles-like desktops. We don't want desktop-like mobiles. We want mobiles that are mobiles, and desktops that are desktops. They're two distinctly different devices, and should be treated as such.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Blurred lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want a brain implant interface to the Internet, running Linux.

    2. Re:Blurred lines by David_Hart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They still don't get it, which is frankly quite the feat.

      We don't want mobiles-like desktops. We don't want desktop-like mobiles. We want mobiles that are mobiles, and desktops that are desktops. They're two distinctly different devices, and should be treated as such.

      I would love to have something like this to replace my old Nexus 7. There is room in the market for a mid sized mobile device that is pocketable for two very simple reasons: Not everyone is comfortable reading tiny web pages or scrolling forever through excel attachemnts on a cell phone and some people enjoy a slightly bigger surface to type on.

      My biggest question for a device like this, assuming a continuous screen, is just how durable the screen is going to be over repetitive opening and closing? And, assuming a limited lifetime, how easy and how costly is it going to be to replace the screen?

    3. Re:Blurred lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5, Obvious to everyone but MS Management.

      I'm still somehow hoping they're going to ditch their tile-and-appy-apps abomination of an OS, like, anytime soon...

    4. Re:Blurred lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In principle, I disagree with you. The best smartphone I've ever had was the Nokia N900 - a device which was essentially a miniaturized Linux desktop with a phone app.

      Modern phones - and indeed, so much of modern consumer technology - mask their power and complexity from the user, and in the process deny users agency. Both Androids and iPhones make me want to chuck the device full speed towards the nearest wall every time I have to use them. I want a pocket computer that can also make phone calls. I want a device that allows me complete control of the choices I can make with it.

      I'll keep an eye out for this device, but I too am skeptical that Microsoft will deliver something like what I'd want.

    5. Re:Blurred lines by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      With Microsoft, you can't even assume that they discussed replacement screens with the manufacturer. They might have no idea if you can easily replace it at the local phone repair place, or if it is not available and there are no repair centers.

    6. Re:Blurred lines by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      We don't want mobiles-like desktops. We don't want desktop-like mobiles.

      Don't speak for us. Speak for yourself. You comments have been heard over and over again about smartphones, about phablets, tablets, notebooks, early laptops, Surface ... slates (horrible name). Guess what, they all sell well enough that companies happily continue producing for the form factor.

      You may not want a mobile like desktop, I do. Not a pocketable one specifically but a tablettable one. On the flip side just like the first Surfaces took on the tablets, this looks set to take on the phablet, also quite a large market.

      Don't like it, don't buy it, but don't claim that no one else wants one.

    7. Re:Blurred lines by Njovich · · Score: 2

      "We want mobiles that are mobiles, and desktops that are desktops. They're two distinctly different devices, and should be treated as such."

      Ah yes, you are exactly like my grandmother was, just wants a phone she can call with. I think they have homes for people like you. God bless you. You wouldn't believe what the kids these days to with phones. Sending text messages, playing computer games with snakes.

    8. Re:Blurred lines by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "We want mobiles that are mobiles, and desktops that are desktops. They're two distinctly different devices, and should be treated as such."

      Ah yes, you are exactly like my grandmother was, just wants a phone she can call with.

      Bollocks. This is like not wanting your technical manuals to be printed in the small paperback format. Sometimes you need a small device, every other time you want a larger device. They weren't saying you shouldn't have the full functionality possible on a smaller device. What they said is that full functionality is not possible on a smaller device, and attempting to gain it is idiotic. You'll never get the full-screen experience, and applications which do not take that into account are garbage for mobile use.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Blurred lines by Njovich · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, I don't need that feature because for you it doesn't work. Reminds me of my grandmother again! For me there are use cases where it's a hell of a lot better than what is there currently. Perhaps you don't need one, just don't buy one.

    10. Re:Blurred lines by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, I don't need that feature because for you it doesn't work. Reminds me of my grandmother again! For me there are use cases where it's a hell of a lot better than what is there currently. Perhaps you don't need one, just don't buy one.

      Everyone who doesn't need one won't buy one, and the pool of potential users isn't large enough to justify an effort sufficient to produce one worth buying, so you can't have one either. If someone DID make one, it would cost a jillion dollars, because the market is vanishingly small. That's what people mean when they say "we don't want that" — it translates to "not enough of us want that for it to be a viable product". HTH you understand English, HAND!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Blurred lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm reminded of the saying people don't know what they want until they see it.

      While Microsoft may fail, if they bring something new there is also the chance that the market will decide they like it and they only way to find it is to accept the possiblity of failure and try.

    12. Re:Blurred lines by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      You assumed my position. Allow me to explain;

      Mobile devices, cell phones specifically, are horrible at content creation. It really comes down to input methods; there's nothing like the mouse and keyboard, or even stylus, for creating content. Touch is something we "make do" with, but you'll notice that we don't use touch monitors on desktops even though they've been available for decades. This despite MS's best attempts to shove them down our throats with windows 8, btw ( and the shills then were out in force! ).

      Mobile devices are decent at consuming content, which you put your finger on. Sure, they aren't as good as desktops, but they're passable, and have the convenience factor ( which is huge ).

      Those are the different usage profiles I was talking about.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    13. Re:Blurred lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually we don't want Microsoft mobile devices at all in the 'phone' vein after being repeatedly dicked on by the person running that side. Repeatedly getting developers to rewrite their apps, promising android support then removing it, then trying to get people to re-write yet again for dead-end Xamarin.

      No thanks, they can now fuck right off. Never buying a Microsoft 'phone/tablet/phablet/whatever todays flavour is' again.

    14. Re:Blurred lines by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 1

      LOL, you have never used a thin client... If you have it was a crappy RDP session to a Windows server managed by monkeys. Load balancing, session balancing based on CPU and RAM are required for RDP farms. For video playback of users that need workstation graphics, HP RGS and VMware PCoIP rock with a gig connection.

      You think I am crazy, well guess what Microsoft wants users to use at home... RDP to all the excess RAM and CPU they have in the Cloun. I hope google or amazon can beat them to it...

      --
      Your Average Joe
  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. Microsoft Inovates.... The Palm Pilot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or... they could put phone circuitry into it and call it a flip-phone.

  15. Speak for yourself by DogDude · · Score: 2

    Speak for yourself. I would like a pocket-sized laptop to be able to do work on. I don't care about "apps" or games or TV or whatever most people do with their phones today. A pocket-sized computer would be very cool because it would be very useful.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re: Speak for yourself by psy · · Score: 2

      Such as the GPD Pocket or the soon to be released upgrade which will be called the GPD Pocket 2?

    2. Re:Speak for yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Planet Computing's Gemini perhaps?

    3. Re:Speak for yourself by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And once you solve the two problems this entails, i.e. needing screen real estate beyond the capabilities of a smartphone screen and fitting a usable keyboard in less than 10x5cm, this will actually become a reality.

      But until you somehow manage to violate the laws of physics it probably won't.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Speak for yourself by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I dunno, they do have folding keyboards now. Granted, it takes up a second pocket after the phone, but for most people who want this that won't be a problem. As to the screen size, that's only a limitation if your vision is poor and can't be corrected, and you also have a problem with immediate working memory. For people who can either see, or remember what was on the screen before they pressed "page down," then it works out just fine.

      I go to the next level and the folding keyboard includes a trackball.

    5. Re:Speak for yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GPD Pocket. It's a 7" laptop that runs Windows 10 or Linux based on a new generation Atom x7 quad core, 8 GB of RAM and a 128 GB SSD. It has built in 802.11ac WiFi, a USB 3 port, a USB C port (also for charging), a micro HDMI port, and a 12 hour battery life.

    6. Re:Speak for yourself by Njovich · · Score: 1

      i.e. needing screen real estate beyond the capabilities of a smartphone screen and fitting a usable keyboard in less than 10x5cm

      If you want a laptop, go buy yourself a laptop, there are lots of stores out there that sell them. Some people perhaps have different wishes and requirements than you. I could use my Motorola Droid just fine for doing some basic development work over SSH. The keyboard was fine for it too. If you have proper eyesight there is a hell of a lot of information you could put on an HD phone screen. On a Galaxy S9 it's much less convenient as any time you use the keyboard it takes up loads of your screen. I would really love a device like this. It obviously wouldn't replace my desktop.

  16. I want the Westworld tablet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tri-fold, all screen. That's what I want.

  17. A phone that can't make calls by raymorris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm going to guess that what is your pocket is a pocket-sized tablet. So, a phone. Except it can't make calls. Also, the OS is 20 GB, leaving 4 GB for the user. Oh, and it's based on Windows, so the battery runs out in three hours.

    Other than those minor nitpicks, it's almost as good as a smartphone. Just a lot more expensive.

    1. Re: A phone that can't make calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually my phone can make calls because youâ(TM)ll see I have a nice iPhone from slashdot not fucking working

    2. Re:A phone that can't make calls by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'll guess that Andromeda is an Android version with Microsoft's own services replacing the Google Services.

      As for size, probably a phablet-sized tablet, and they'll wait to see if users want it before they try to negotiate with carriers for access.

    3. Re:A phone that can't make calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will also install force-pushed updates every two hours and reboot automatically. And on every update it randomizes the UI component locations and restores all the configurations user has done and also reverts privacy settings to maximum spying.

    4. Re: A phone that can't make calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want the foldable phone from the New Zealand TV series "This Is Not My Life." Most of the sci-fi gear on that looked like it was ripped from a Corning Glass wet dream, and that is a beautiful thing.

    5. Re: A phone that can't make calls by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      You could turn off 'smart' punctuation in the keyboard settings to stop it messing with Slashdot

    6. Re:A phone that can't make calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a lot more expensive ...and thinner, because no screen,see? And no keypad, you follow? In fact, it is so thin, you'd swear it was just another credit card.

  18. Notch content? by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    Does it have a notch? Might be important one way or the other.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  19. Here's a non-Verge link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I aint clickin no verge links punk! Here's some non-verge links:
    https://twitter.com/D_Breyer
    https://bgr.com/2018/06/29/microsoft-andromeda-foldable-tablet-leak-details/

  20. Looks like a DS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nintendo's lawyers are probably thinking about what size boat to get with all the billable hours they're going to have over this.

    1. Re:Looks like a DS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nintendo? Pfffffft young whipper snapper. Casio would come in first with their early 90s electric organizers.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_organizer

  21. So it can make calls, unless you hold it wrong by raymorris · · Score: 0

    > Actually my phone can make calls because I have a nice iPhone

    Ah, so it can make calls. Unless your thumb is in a comfortable position. That's okay, though, it's innovative - it has rounded corners.

  22. The best of two worlds by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    So, if I got this right, we will finally be able to have a laptop with an unusable keyboard and a way too small screen coupled with the usefulness of Windows on a smartphone?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:The best of two worlds by Desler · · Score: 1

      But there will be "experiences"!!!

  23. So this is MS Courier then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have no idea what to expect. Courier was meant to be a distraction-free workflow aid. Gates killed it before it got off the ground internally—because it didn't run Outlook. That was a thing I wanted, but today's market doesn't want anything that fits in your pocket and isn't also a phone.

    I'm afraid the thing is going to end up in some kind of Win10S situation. Basically, all the disadvantages of a phone, none of the advantages of a not-phone. And a winphone at that. So basically, Zune 2018 edition.

    Whatever it is, it will surely run Outlook. Honestly, I'll buy one if it truly is a work-aid, and isn't too adversarial to side-loaded applications. If it's a distraction device or is ultimately yet another contrivance to get me into the windows store, I will take a pass. I already have a phone, it does all that (except that the store, while still a cesspit of garbage, is much, much better.)

    1. Re:So this is MS Courier then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > because it didn't run Outlook
      For a guy that people consider the pinnacle of geekdom and some kind of über nerd, Bill Gates sure does not "get" it lots of times. Outlook is software, the Courier was a computing device that runs ... software. (I'll leave the rest up to the reader).

  24. 24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Chloe, send the schematics to my pocketable Surface. Well, at least when I get to a Starbucks or MacDonalds and can get some WiFi. Let's hope the terrorists haven't blown up the ocean liner with The Dalai Lama, The Archbishop of Caterbury, The Pope, and Bono on before then".

  25. Newsflash: Microsoft makes use of its deep pockets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "pocketable" device is likely a supercomputer.

  26. Surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surface uses wifi. Its like getting the Microsoft Store all the time. But at a closer reach. Surface RT

  27. Read it wrong by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    With the size I had my window, the end of the line was: "the device can fold over like a book and a pen." I was really confused as to why it could fold like a pen.

    1. Re:Read it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It stated that it could fold like a penknife; your screen is half a centimeter short. But thanks for RTFA, mate

  28. Another useless ideal from Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why doesn't Microsoft just focus on a comparable mobile device to others out there? It always has to be different and tends to fail at different. Just like mobile arena with smartphones, it could have been much more relevant if it just knew how to make a premium phone. No doubt the Surface line is certainly a success albeit not without some issues. But then you see things like a small folding phablet device leak that really screams niche or failure. If your trying to succeed in mobile Microsoft, you have to get back to a popular and basic approach.

  29. Exposing the Secret Office 365 Forensics Tool by najajomo · · Score: 2

    'An ethical crisis in the digital forensics industry came to a head last week with the release of new details on Microsoft’s undocumented “Activities” API. A previously unknown trove of access and activity logs held by Microsoft allows investigators to track Office 365 mailbox activity in minute detail. Following a long period of mystery and rumors about the existence of such a tool, the details finally emerged, thanks to a video by Anonymous and follow-up research by CrowdStrike.'