Slashdot Mirror


How Smart TVs in Millions of US Homes Track More Than What's on Tonight (nytimes.com)

The growing concern over online data and user privacy has been focused on tech giants like Facebook and devices like smartphones. But people's data is also increasingly being vacuumed right out of their living rooms via their televisions, sometimes without their knowledge. From a report: In recent years, data companies have harnessed new technology to immediately identify what people are watching on internet-connected TVs, then using that information to send targeted advertisements to other devices in their homes. Marketers, forever hungry to get their products in front of the people most likely to buy them, have eagerly embraced such practices. But the companies watching what people watch have also faced scrutiny from regulators and privacy advocates over how transparent they are being with users.

Samba TV is one of the bigger companies that track viewer information to make personalized show recommendations. The company said it collected viewing data from 13.5 million smart TVs in the United States, and it has raised $40 million in venture funding from investors including Time Warner, the cable operator Liberty Global and the billionaire Mark Cuban. Samba TV has struck deals with roughly a dozen TV brands -- including Sony, Sharp, TCL and Philips -- to place its software on certain sets. When people set up their TVs, a screen urges them to enable a service called Samba Interactive TV, saying it recommends shows and provides special offers "by cleverly recognizing onscreen content." But the screen, which contains the enable button, does not detail how much information Samba TV collects to make those recommendations.... Once enabled, Samba TV can track nearly everything that appears on the TV on a second-by-second basis, essentially reading pixels to identify network shows and ads, as well as programs on Netflix and HBO and even video games played on the TV.

128 comments

  1. Don't see the big deal here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If it can suggest to me some shows that I will enjoy and would otherwise have missed, and it doesn't cost me any money, then I'm all for it. And conversely it keeps a lot of garbage off the air by letting them know what I don't watch. I feel this is information that really can't hurt me. I don't see them querying my TV to see what I was watching on the evening my mother in law was suspiciously murdered or anything.

    1. Re:Don't see the big deal here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But someone has to categorize and classify all the other TV programs so that they can matched. That costs money. So they have to recover that money somehow. So by logging when your TV is turned on and off, which program was watched and for how long, whether the channel was changed because of an advert, which advert was watched, they can figure out your maximum tolerance for watching adverts against watching a TV show. They can also figure out when you get home in the evening, when you go to bed and what times you watch TV in the weekends.

    2. Re:Don't see the big deal here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they could just ask me LOL

    3. Re:Don't see the big deal here. by Immerman · · Score: 2

      >But someone has to categorize and classify all the other TV programs so that they can matched.

      Why? Other than for completely new showsit's probably far more effective to simply say "you watch shows X, Y, and Z - a lot of other other people who watch those shows also watch W and R, you might like them too" Such pattern recognition tends to find a lot of non-obvious connections that would be overlooked by human classification, especially as it gets more sophisticated.

      Plus, it's fairly cheap to do, so they can pocket more of the profit made from spying on consumers. And lets not assume they're only spying on your TV-related habits. They're a surveillance device connected to your home network - they can also monitor all your web-browsing activity (by site if not by specific content, with https becoming more ubiquitous), and identify every piece of networked hardware you own via MAC address

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    4. Re:Don't see the big deal here. by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it can suggest to me some shows that I will enjoy and would otherwise have missed, and it doesn't cost me any money, then I'm all for it.

      That's the spirit! It's nice to finally see that some people are team players instead of looking for darkness in everything.

      Now please finish entering your masturbation log (the period of July 1 - 5 appears to be incomplete). We need this data so that our algorithms can most accurately forecast when it will be the best time to show another porn ad. And you know the drill: it's free to have it scheduled for you, and a mere $0.23 to instead scheduled it to appear in the feed for that special someone.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    5. Re:Don't see the big deal here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had that problem with TiVo's and the profiling algorithm used. Watch World War II documentaries and you are a neo-Nazi. Watch Wentworth (Prisoner Cell Block H) and you were a closet lesbian. God help you if you watched both.

    6. Re: Don't see the big deal here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they use your data beyond the functionality of your tv. So do the people they sell it to. So does Google, Facebook, Amazon, et. al. every time you use their services. Until and if we ever have better privacy regulations, even powering a lot of these devices on is foolishness.

    7. Re: Don't see the big deal here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats fine until you use the tv to watch some naughty home movies you and your spouse starred in, or you use it as a computer monitor reviewing financial info and passwords and the set is periodically sending screen captures up to the mothership. This kind of hidden spying is not ok.

    8. Re: Don't see the big deal here. by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      And the camera on the TV also?

    9. Re:Don't see the big deal here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that. The mic is enabled and they "listen" to your reaction to the
      show(s) you're watching (it's a AI that aggregates your sounds, but still...)

      Not something I have an interest. Also, if you can't read the TV Guide for
      reviews and such, are you going to trust some Indian telling you what you
      should / should not watch? Really?

      CAP === 'global'

    10. Re:Don't see the big deal here. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      If it can suggest to me some shows that I will enjoy and would otherwise have missed, and it doesn't cost me any money, then I'm all for it. And conversely it keeps a lot of garbage off the air by letting them know what I don't watch. I feel this is information that really can't hurt me. I don't see them querying my TV to see what I was watching on the evening my mother in law was suspiciously murdered or anything.

      However, you might be in trouble when they find that you murdered your MIL in the living room in view of your Smart TVs camera.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    11. Re:Don't see the big deal here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you can leave the tv on all the time and let the dog play with the remote.

    12. Re:Don't see the big deal here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without their knowledge? Did you even read that terms of service?

    13. Re: Don't see the big deal here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry mate. Who is still using hubs in 2018? A layer 2 switch will route the packet to the gateway and the tv will see nothing it wasn't addressed to see.

    14. Re:Don't see the big deal here. by pnutjam · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, that's correct. July 1-5 is one entry.

    15. Re: Don't see the big deal here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks. I haven't seen a genuine joke on Slashdot in a long time.

    16. Re:Don't see the big deal here. by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      If it can suggest to me some shows that I will enjoy and would otherwise have missed, and it doesn't cost me any money, then I'm all for it. And conversely it keeps a lot of garbage off the air by letting them know what I don't watch.

      The objective function is NOT making you happy. It's maximizing profit.

      I feel this is information that really can't hurt me.

      When they are able to determine the limits of your tolerances to "garbage" good luck believing it won't be maximally leveraged against YOU.

      I don't see them querying my TV to see what I was watching on the evening my mother in law was suspiciously murdered or anything.

      I don't either. This would be pointless and redundant as all of the data would have already been transmitted and stored by a third party subject to the third party doctrine.

    17. Re:Don't see the big deal here. by lgw · · Score: 1

      Funniest thing on Slashdot this month.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    18. Re:Don't see the big deal here. by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      They're a surveillance device connected to your home network - they can also monitor all your web-browsing activity (by site if not by specific content, with https becoming more ubiquitous), and identify every piece of networked hardware you own via MAC address

      Please don't spread FUD. If you have evidence that smart TVs are monitoring network traffic go ahead and post it. Otherwise please stop making up shit. Smart TVs *could* monitor your network traffic in the same way ANY device connected to your network could do the same... including your router itself.

      Unless you only allow OSS on your network and review all of the code.

    19. Re:Don't see the big deal here. by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      A *person* might not query your viewing habits, but machine learning might use them to help assign probabilities to your matching various patterns.

      Did you re-watch certain scenes in "little miss sunshine". Might reduce your chances at a teaching job.

      Do you watch movies that glorify criminal activity or re-watch scenes that present extremists in a positive light?

      Do you rewatch sex scenes in movies more or less often than the average viewer. Do your watching habits indicates that your sexual orientation may be different from what you have indicated on Facebook to your friends?

      How often do you watch late at night before a work day. Are you suffering from sleep deprivation that might affect your ability to use heavy construction equipment.

      All for your own good and the safety of society of course.

  2. Is this still news? by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How many times do we need to repeat this story?

    1) X is put into person's home/pocket.
    2) X asks for your email address and phone number then starts to track every movement and button press.
    3) People act all surprised!

    Film at 11.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Is this still news? by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

      We need to keep repeating stories like this because we don't accept that they should be normal even if they are.

      There are all sorts of things that are normal in world both inside and outside the tech spectrum that need to be brought up even if they are normal practice because if they aren't brought up then we either fail to recognise them or just accept them.

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    2. Re:Is this still news? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There is no step 2, it doesn't ask for your email address or phone number. All it needs is some unique ID that the TV OS supplies it.

      Clearly telling people this doesn't work. It's a failed solution to the problem. What you need are proper privacy laws like the GDPR, where they have to get you to explicitly opt-in to all the data sharing separately from anything else and state in clear language what they intend to do.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re: Is this still news? by sound+vision · · Score: 2

      How many times? As many times as it happens. News isn't supposed to be entertaining. Here's an exercise for you. Rank CSPAN, Fox News, and World Weekly News in entertainment value. Now, rank them in how consequential the stories they cover are. You will see there is an inverse relationship.

    4. Re:Is this still news? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      We need to keep repeating stories like this because we don't accept that they should be normal even if they are.

      Why? Why does anyone really give a rat's ass whether the advertising they see is "targeted" or not? It's not like advertising generates a mysterious force that causes you to go out in zombie-mode and buy, buy, buy!

      Personally, between the adblockers on my computers and my complete disinclination to buy much of anything, I can't really see this as doing anything except wasting some company's money....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    5. Re:Is this still news? by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

      Because your world is based on what you know. Targeted advertising allows a better control of your world view where better is in the hands of the advertiser. As an example, think of music chart manipulation.

      "Until 1991 the pop music charts were notoriously unreliable. Paying off record store employees with free albums, concert tickets and even vacations and washing machines was the standard music-business method of manipulating record sales figures. Even the Billboard magazine charts, considered the most prestigious in the business, were compiled from store managers' oral reports, which were inaccurate to begin with and easily swayed."

      The same thing with targeted advertising. You only see what they want to sell, not a true range of goods or services from which to choose.

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    6. Re:Is this still news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is tehre any evidence that GDPR will prevent it?
      In my experience people juts click "accept" when the alternative is "we'll re-rout yo to the logged out page".

    7. Re:Is this still news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a family member who will argue all day that UFO's are of alien origin and are common on Earth.

      He loves his Amazon Echo no matter what I tell him.

      And yes, he voted for Trump.

  3. Bought my TV in 2008 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've paid to have it repaired three times in the last decade rather than willingly bug my own home with anything on the market now.

    1. Re:Bought my TV in 2008 by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      You can still buy something new, snip the WiFi antenna, and just use HDMI inputs.

    2. Re:Bought my TV in 2008 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What about just not allowing it to connect to your router? i.e. block the MAC Address?

      My Sony TV is not connected to the internet. It is connected to FreeSat (UK) which gives me around 100 free to air TV channels (no monthly payments) and also a Humax Freesat PVR (via HDMI).
      Any information that the TV has about my viewing habits is going nowhere. My router firewall is configure to block any requests from the TV's MAC address.

    3. Re:Bought my TV in 2008 by Immerman · · Score: 1

      They're getting sneaky though - I've seen TVs that require a wifi connection to sync with the remote control. Not clear on whether it was actually a wifi remote, or just a hoop to make consumers jump through to get that wifi connection established in the first place, but given the relative costs of IR versus wifi, it's really hard to interpret that as anything but a way to coerce cooperation with surveillance. Wouldn't be so bad if you could use the TV without the remote, but there's usually a whole lot of features not accessible except via remote.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    4. Re:Bought my TV in 2008 by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Can you give it a WiFi network with no Internet?

    5. Re:Bought my TV in 2008 by Immerman · · Score: 2

      I don't know. I'm fairly certain that's beyond the skill set of the vast majority of the population though, so it's irrelevant except to us tech geeks.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    6. Re:Bought my TV in 2008 by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You can get cheap, dumb 4K IPS TVs. Several brands, but it's the same set.

      I was worried. Reviews generally sucked, but not unhappy with it. $300 for a 55 4K TV (not the lowest price ever). Speakers are bad, but long covered.

      I assume the quality control is terrible and I got lucky. But so what? You might be delayed with round trips until you get a good one, how much of a problem is that?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Bought my TV in 2008 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you give it a WiFi network with no Internet?

      Technically, sure. But it's a given that it was set up to need an internet connection to work. Otherwise how could it call home?

    8. Re:Bought my TV in 2008 by omnichad · · Score: 1

      How do you set up WiFi without the remote?

    9. Re:Bought my TV in 2008 by Immerman · · Score: 1

      I forget. Probably volume and channel buttons to navigate an onscreen keyboard.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    10. Re:Bought my TV in 2008 by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Can you give it a WiFi network with no Internet?

      Set up a VLAN for your WiFi device (and those connected through it) and block that at your main router. Or assign the device a static IP and block that -- or assign it an static IP that won't route off the LAN.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    11. Re:Bought my TV in 2008 by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

      Don't need to snip anything -- switch to a media server or dvr, problem solved.

    12. Re:Bought my TV in 2008 by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. Internet is convenient for browsing free movies online but not essential. My media server and Chromecast are strictly internal.

  4. your cable box reports all kinds of info as well by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    your cable box reports all kinds of info as well about what you are viewing.

  5. âoeSmartâtv is for dummies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Youâ(TM)d have to be an idiot to buy a smart tv, and even if itâ(TM)s the only thing in the store, to actually connect it to the net is insane. Buy a rocky ir amazon streaming device and unplug it when not in use. Works like a charm with my Apple TV and TiVo box.

    1. Re:âoeSmartâtv is for dummies. by vtcodger · · Score: 2

      Have you tried buying an unsmart TV in the US recently? Moreover, even if you have a home router and have access and know how to set up its routing tables, how do you know what IP address(es) your new 56 inch Spycoware TV is using? And if it's streaming, material you can't just block the miserable thing no matter how appealing the idea. I suspect the same is true in the rest of the world as well.

      My question is who is actually paying for the vast amount of almost certainly worthless data they are collecting, and why? Is there any chance they will quit paying and eventually cause this nonsense to fade away?

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    2. Re:âoeSmartâtv is for dummies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My question is who is actually paying for the vast amount of almost certainly worthless data they are collecting, and why? Is there any chance they will quit paying and eventually cause this nonsense to fade away?

      Adjust your questions to be about spam instead and you'll have your answer.

    3. Re:âoeSmartâtv is for dummies. by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      I had a solution: I stopped watching TV in the mid 1980s. Life much better. What I might want to see I CAN see on the internet. YES, I know about privacy issues there.

    4. Re:âoeSmartâtv is for dummies. by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Have you tried buying an unsmart TV in the US recently? Moreover, even if you have a home router and have access and know how to set up its routing tables, how do you know what IP address(es) your new 56 inch Spycoware TV is using?

      I look at the DHCP reservations and figure out its MAC, then block that. I have yet to hear of one of these devices doing MAC randomization.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re: âoeSmartâtv is for dummies. by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Are you actually asking questions or are you trolling? No you can't really get dumb TVs over a certain size anymore. But connecting them to the Internet requires you to set them up that way. If you are like many people, you simply do not set them up. If you are paranoid, you can turn off connection on your TV. If you are ultra paranoid, you can block your TV from connecting to your home router.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    6. Re:âoeSmartâtv is for dummies. by Smidge204 · · Score: 2

      I disagree that the data is "almost certainly worthless" - it's data on your habits and preferences, which is valuable to advertisers and content producers.

      If the TV uses your own internet connection, then the data it collects can plausibly be associated with your internet browsing habits since it's the same IP/account. Once that connection is made your entire life is pretty much laid bare... who you are, where you live, your gender, age, income, education, credit rating, purchasing habits, employment history, who your friends are, etc etc.
      =Smidge=

    7. Re: âoeSmartâtv is for dummies. by apoc.famine · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I concur. The last TV I bought had no non-smart models in that price and size range. So I bought a "smart" one, and hooked it up to power and two HDMI cables. One to the cable box, and one to the streaming/media computer. (An Asus Chromebox running Ubuntu with extra memory and storage.) Given that most "smart" TVs still require you to type shit by arrowing around with the remote, I can't imaging even trying to use it as such. So much easier to have a desktop browser with wireless keyboard and mouse.

      It's irritating that the TV needs to boot up and think for 4-5 seconds before it responds to remote commands, but other than that it's pretty much a dumb TV. I'm unclear why the GP has gone down the specific rabbit hole he has.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    8. Re:âoeSmartâtv is for dummies. by houghi · · Score: 2

      That is all great where you are able to do that. Could you call my mom and explain it to her on how to do that?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    9. Re: âoeSmartâtv is for dummies. by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can get reasonably big (65 is easy) dumb 4k tvs. Just not in a name brand.

      But good news, the panels are all the same.

      Once I realized that all the dumb TVs were the same, I was left with no viable choice, took the small financial risk. It's not bad, as good as any IPS screen, which isn't a surprise as the screen likely came off the same line.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:âoeSmartâtv is for dummies. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Have you tried buying an unsmart TV in the US recently? Moreover, even if you have a home router and have access and know how to set up its routing tables, how do you know what IP address(es) your new 56 inch Spycoware TV is using?

      I look at the DHCP reservations and figure out its MAC, then block that. I have yet to hear of one of these devices doing MAC randomization.

      That is all great where you are able to do that. Could you call my mom and explain it to her on how to do that?

      I answered the question asked. If you want me to provide tech support to your mom, we can install a router at her house with some kind of remote access that I can use to perform administration.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:âoeSmartâtv is for dummies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have you tried buying an unsmart TV in the US recently?

      Yes, but there is a trick to it that the advertising industry doesn't want you to know and is difficult to without knowing.

      "unsmart tv" or "dumb tv", or in fact any term that would imply being counter to a "smart tv", doesn't really exist. I'm sure on purpose.

      But if you use the secret search term "computer monitor hdmi", you'll find plenty of options in most of the same screen sizes, all of which will accept input from your cable box.

      There are a couple limitations of these dumb TVs you should be aware of however:

      1) They will only function as a TV for the 99% of Americans that have a "tuner box" from their cable or satellite provider.

      If you are in the smaller group that uses an antenna for broadcast TV, these dumb TVs will not have a tuner built in.
      They do exist as 3rd party add-ons however, as these are needed for older TVs too as most (all?) areas in the US no longer broadcast analog channels.
      They usually run about $20-25

      Satellite service pretty much requires such tuner boxes, so won't be any problem there.
      Cable service depends on your provider. Spectrum/TimeWarner for example, this won't be a problem as those boxes are required, there is no unencrypted analog channels on the wire anymore.
      Comcast was rumored earlier in the year to be going this route, but I don't know if that has happened. (They don't service my area, so I don't keep up on their goings-ons)

      2) These dumb TVs don't fully go up in size the same as current smart TVs.
      The largest I've seen in a store (Microcenter) was a 90"
      This is smaller than the latest LG/Sony offerings at this years CES, as their smart TVs go up to 120" now.

      3) Mind how many HDMI inputs the display has. It's typically much less than a smart TV, and usually it's one (1)
      For those with many devices to connect to their dumb TV, this might be an issue.

      For the less technically inclined, this might require another 3rd party product, an HDMI switchbox.
      Thankfully they are pretty cheap. $40 for 4 ports.

      For the more technically inclined however, these dumb TVs will and do contain other non-HDMI ports that may serve your needs.
      DVI-D for example becomes an HDMI port with a cheap adapter or cable for it, one you may have sitting around that perhaps came with an older video card.
      Display port or VGA may be helpful if you use closer to standard computer hardware to stream video online.

      4) Sound, by default these dumb TVs won't provide sound unless explicitly listed in its features.
      This is OK, as there is another 3rd party product called an "hdmi sound extractor" that you plug in and can connect it to your sound system. These run about $25-30

      So, the big question is does this dumb tv setup work for you? Good question!

      There tend to be two groups of people with vastly different requirements for their TV.
      One group are those with limited financial resources. The other group tends to have much more financial resources and expendable income.

      I don't mean to be insensitive or judgmental here, but it's mainly the first group that needs to pay extra attention to the details:
      The 3rd party addons above can add a good $100 on top of the dumb TV itself. This may not be insignificant.

      This group also does tend to favor more economical options on average.
      One may not have a cable subscription or satellite service, but utilize over the air broadcasting. As I said, this requires an extra purchase, so needs kept in mind on total cost.

      One may also favor options like renting DVDs/Blurays, which need a player. I'll assume the player is already taken care of, as it would need to be for a smart tv too, however it does matter when it comes down to the number of HDMI inputs to plug one into.
      The switch box mentioned then becomes needed, and adds to the total cost.

      The same goes for videogame consoles, which TBH is a form of entertainment both groups enjoy, b

    12. Re:âoeSmartâtv is for dummies. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I've got a dumb TV. Even if you do have a smart TV, nothing prevents you from plugging in an ethernet or giving it your wifi password. Stick on a Roku or other streaming device instead. That way if you find out it's spying on you then it's a lot cheaper to replace that $50 device than to get a new TV.

    13. Re:âoeSmartâtv is for dummies. by houghi · · Score: 1

      So you want to get access so other don't have the access? Nice try.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    14. Re:âoeSmartâtv is for dummies. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So you want to get access so other don't have the access? Nice try.

      That's pretty much how it works. At some point, you have to trust someone. If your mom doesn't know anything, a remote support tech could easily trick her into adding a rule or turning on an option that would accomplish the same thing for an attacker instead.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:âoeSmartâtv is for dummies. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have a dumb TV too, and I use a Fire TV Stick (2nd) for video streaming. Right now it's actually hooked up to the HDMI port on my monitor, because the TV is in storage. But if I had a "smart" TV I wouldn't fret, because it's easy enough to keep under control. Just firewall that part off, and don't use it, and then the only annoyance comes when you accidentally switch to its input.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. Dont network your TV by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    Bring media and more trusted networked devices to your display.
    Never allow your TV to report back your media use habits.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Dont network your TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Chromecast? shit.
      uh ... Fire stick? They advertise that thing is listening to you.
      Xbox? damnit.
      DVD players and VCRs are the only things that might not be spying on you.

      At least with a book, it's only the library keeping track.

    2. Re:Dont network your TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux PC with Bittorrent and VLC player installed and a remote keyboard with pointing device. Donesky! Free stuff and no spying.

    3. Re:Dont network your TV by olsmeister · · Score: 2

      That hot librarian knows what you read.

    4. Re:Dont network your TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still using a Wii to stream Netflix to my dumb HDTV.

    5. Re:Dont network your TV by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but librarians are usually pretty adamant about defending your privacy. Something about generally being well-read individuals with an awareness of their traditional role as guardians of the public's access to knowledge against the thought police.

      So yeah, that hot librarian may know what you read, but they'll probably put up a huge fight to protect that information from those who would abuse it. More than a few libraries have chosen to destroy their records rather than allow government authorities to access them.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    6. Re:Dont network your TV by omnichad · · Score: 1

      So in SD over analog cables? Seems like a waste.

    7. Re:Dont network your TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If done with Component cables this probably looks good.

    8. Re:Dont network your TV by omnichad · · Score: 1

      It's still only 480p. Not HD. The Wii hardware doesn't go above that.

    9. Re:Dont network your TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That hot librarian knows what you read.

      I don't check my books out from porn stars.

    10. Re:Dont network your TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Video uality has never mattered to me. I have Netflix set for minimum quality, so my family can stream 2 shows while I telecommute, all on a 12 Mbps DSL.
      I also rip DVDs to MP4 files of only about 200-400 megabytes each. My NAS is a low-power laptop with a broken screen.

  7. First HOSTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thankfully I use APK's Hosts File Engine For Smart TVs, so there no chance of tracking me.

  8. netflix knows what i'm watching as well by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

    OMG, cover the TV in tinfoil

    1. Re:netflix knows what i'm watching as well by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Or just don't enable the wifi and don't let it pick up an IP address. I really don't like that they have a mic.
      When I need access to NetFlix, Amazon prime, etc, I use my Sony BluRay player instead, which gives me a better picture anyway for some reason (Samsung vs Sony maybe?) At least that divorces it from the television and is only on when I'm watching 'net shows.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    2. Re:netflix knows what i'm watching as well by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      As far as the mic, a pin pushed through the mic-hole would likely destroy it.

    3. Re:netflix knows what i'm watching as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's cute that you think the hole you're looking at is actually its location... or that it's the only one present.

  9. One more time! by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How many times do we need to repeat this story?

    One more time as always.

  10. That's why I use an Amazon Fire Stick by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

    Smart TVs tracking you and invading your privacy!

    That's scandalous... that's why I only use an Amazon Firestick and control it with my Amazon Alexa. This way I can't be tracked. Nothing I do will be uploaded!

    I'll make a post to Facebook recommending all my followers there to do the same.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:That's why I use an Amazon Fire Stick by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to make a few tweets as well. Or post on Instagram, Snapchat, or tumblr... it's like everyone wants to star on Big Brother.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    2. Re:That's why I use an Amazon Fire Stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not being tracked? Really?
      Amazon is tracking your every move just waiting to sling 'Buy This' ads at you.
      Any use of Amazon or Google is tracked. That is the way of the world these days

    3. Re:That's why I use an Amazon Fire Stick by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The difference is that you get something out of being tracked by Google or Amazon, but you get nothing out of being tracked by a smart tv, or some store's loyalty card program. Is the former kind of tracking still a problem? Sure. Is the latter a bigger kind? Also yes, because there may be some controls on the former kind, but there are none on the latter.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:That's why I use an Amazon Fire Stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that you get something out of being tracked by Google or Amazon, but you get nothing out of being tracked by a smart tv, or some store's loyalty card program.

      I think you have that backwards. The TV tracking is used to subsidize some of the company's costs, letting them undercut their competition slightly. Loyalty cards get you additional coupons and used to build up to significant free products (now it's no-cost things sooner rather than valuable things eventually).

    5. Re:That's why I use an Amazon Fire Stick by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Loyalty cards get you additional coupons and used to build up to significant free products (now it's no-cost things sooner rather than valuable things eventually).

      If someone is giving you a product for less only if you have a loyalty card, you can be 100% certain that someone else also has it for less. Your data is not worth so much that they will give you a dollar for it, but people are so stupid that they will believe that they got a great deal on something when in reality they're just not giving that dollar off the product to people without the card even though they totally could. In every case, you can find the same product cheaper elsewhere. Granted, sometimes you have to order it (usually from Amazon) and then wait for it, but it's still a better deal than being jerked with a loyalty card.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:That's why I use an Amazon Fire Stick by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Dumb noname 4K TVs are _cheaper_ than smart TVs.

      They use the same IPS panels.

      The brands you trust are no longer trustworthy (if they ever were). React appropriately.

      Half the brands are just Matsushita crap anyhow.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:That's why I use an Amazon Fire Stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that you get something out of being tracked by Google or Amazon,

      What do you get?

  11. And the fix for this is by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    " on internet-connected TVs "

    Disconnect said device from the Internet. Problem solved via a simple solution.
    or
    Allow the connection, identify telemetry addresses and block those at the router. Problem solved via slightly more complex solution.

    The former is easier than the latter.
    This really applies to EVERYTHING you connect to the Internet / Network. Assume it's hostile or a potentially leaky device and treat it as such.

    " Trust, but verify " as the saying goes.

    1. Re:And the fix for this is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " on internet-connected TVs "

      Disconnect said device from the Internet. Problem solved via a simple solution.

      Bring in the device, set it up hardwired, let it update and then disconnect. Once a year or so ( during your 2week vacation) unplug said device and upon return drag the cable out, let it update and disconnect the cable.

      And yes, I'm aware that it won't work if the device has battery backed up ram or a hard drive, but most /.ers wouldn't know how to handle those any way.

    2. Re:And the fix for this is by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      "...identify telemetry addresses..."

      And there's the problem right there. You know how to do that. The overwhelming majority of people who use "smart" TV's don't. And they certainly don't know how to deal with the problem at the router. So they just look the other way and try not to think about the information they're giving up. Don't forget, it's not as though this is the ONLY data being gathered and used to build a profile on millions of walking wallets. Marketers get this information and combine it with smart phone info and social media data and location data.

      And as they assemble more and more profiles of more and more people, the fact that you are one of the rare ones who have protected yourself to some minimal degree becomes irrelevant. The information in YOUR profile will simply come from all the people you interact with...and it will be pretty accurate and comprehensive.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    3. Re: And the fix for this is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until the next gen TVS put in "toast" overlay nag screens that keeps telling you that things are not properly set up whenever you turn the TV on....and it takes longer and longer for the "toast" to disappear

    4. Re:And the fix for this is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Trust, but verify " as the saying goes.

      Did you read the article? According to that, about 90% of people agree to allow data collection. That's partly due to misleading agreement terms during TV setup that make the spyware seem like free extras. But there's also coercion. See here:

      https://www.consumerreports.or...

      "....if you decline permissions, you can lose a surprising amount of functionality. In fact, one TV requires that you accept a broad privacy policy during setup before you can use the most basic, internet-free functions, such as watching TV using an antenna."

      The NYT didn't bother to mention that detail. Yes, one can disconnect from the Internet. I don't have my TV connected to the Internet. But I also don't have any interest in streaming TV shows. I get DVDs from Netflix and the local library. Most people do want streaming options.

      In other words, most people want functionality in their TV that is specifically blocked if they don't agree to data collection *by the device*. They're not even being asked to let Netflix monitor their activity. The TV set itself refuses to work unless they allow the data collection! I don't remember signing any EULA last time I bought a TV at Best Buy. Yet according to these reports, I might
      buy a TV today that would refuse to work with my antenna.

    5. Re:And the fix for this is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait... how do they know that 90% allow data collection? If the other 10% don't allow it, how did they get that data? Shouldn't they only know about the 100% that agree?

  12. Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's popping open a microphone and listening to me do the nasty, I'll be concerned.

    If it's recording that I am watching Sean Bean not die horribly on the field of Waterloo: Fuck yes, I am all for this.

    1. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's popping open a microphone and listening to me do the nasty, I'll be concerned... for them.

  13. Oh, now I get it. by vrassoc · · Score: 4, Funny

    So that explains the ads I see after having left our house in the care of a house sitter for two weeks. Man, I knew that last guy was a freak.

    1. Re:Oh, now I get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      42

    2. Re:Oh, now I get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peyote soup this Sthrustraint.

  14. and this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a retarded tv

  15. Re:your cable box reports all kinds of info as wel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    your cable box reports all kinds of info as well about what you are viewing.

    Yeah, but I make sure I'm always watching stuff I don't like. So the joke's on them.

  16. And I don't have one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your cable box reports all kinds of info as well about what you are viewing.

    I cut the cord years ago and never missed it.

    Ya know, most cable and other subscription services of any kind pretty much isn't worth it. They lock you into these one sided contracts and then gouge you.

    None of them are worth it.

    And it baffles me when I mention this to people who bitch about their cable and service that they "can't do without their sports".

    Jesus Christ, get off your fat ass and join a league. For the price of one month's cable bill, I got a great tennis racket. League membership is $30 a season and I get to meet new people. It's even cheaper if you're a soccer, softball or tag football player.

    1. Re:And I don't have one. by antdude · · Score: 1

      Outside is overrated though!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  17. Re:your cable box reports all kinds of info as wel by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    what do you have an 22G cap on your LTE cell link?

  18. Shocking! by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    Yet another "smart device" who's real purpose it to monitor and monetize the masses. "Smart Devices" are not for consumers - their for corporations.

    1. Re:Shocking! by devslash0 · · Score: 1

      I hear my work colleagues discussing smart devices, assistants and what not all the time and I don't understand why would you ever want to put such an intruding technology inside your house. Is the promise of convenience and being able to boast to your neighbours really worth giving up every information about you? Soon enough those devices will be capable of recognising their surroundings and reporting back what you own, what you do, perhaps even what's written on your correspondence if you read your letters in their proximity. You'd be sitting in front of your TV one evening and your personal assistant would ask you whether you'd like to purchase a new tube of vaseline and have it delivered by Uber Instant Sex Supplies within next 30 minutes because it noticed that you usually wax your carrot around that time and you're low on supplies. Oh, and would you like a girl with that? We're having a 50% discount on blowjobs today.

      In the past there was a physical barrier between you, your home and people who'd like to build your advertising profile. That barrier was your house door. Impenetrable. These days, however, we willingly carry trojan horses painted with various logos and brand names into our houses. Are our homes still our castles?

  19. Re:And the fix for this is FALSE DATA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything is a protocol.
    Revese engineer that protocol and send them a duff payload.
    I think I would send them that I watch TV 24 hours a day 7 days a week and change chanels randomly every 30 seconds. A Rasberry Pi could simulate that, while playing back the gospel channel so that speech recognition accurately detects the kind of church going person I am not.
    Improvements to be added are muting all know ads when they appear, or a very high chance of a channel change if an ad is presented and a bias towards PBS.

    As these apps have not made it, I presume they are buying out and shutting down
    adblockers and howto filter faqs as they pop up. magic words like 'Buy, special offer, new car, sale' would also trigger a channel change.

  20. Not an issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who actually uses the "Smart" functions on a TV? They've always kind of sucked in my opinion that goes triple by the time the TV is 5+ years old.

    Can't track you unless you are stupid enough to plug in an Ethernet cable or put in your wifi password.

  21. Enable button is NOT enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What drubs my ding is when they have an "Enable" button along with a "Not Now" button and no way to say "F**k off forever" so every time you turn on the device it begs to be enabled each time.

    At that point I usually just undo the Internet connection on my "smart" tv or "smart" receiver and if the messages don't stop, I take it back as broken.

  22. Re:your cable box reports all kinds of info as wel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's appalling! I just found out a provider can track what you stream from them too!

  23. When does the bubble pop? by Gilgaron · · Score: 2

    I still have this feeling like all this data valuation is a bubble, it is hard enough to glean useful trends out of rigorously collected scientific data. How much does Charmin pay Samsung to find out that the basement TV primarily streams PJ Mask and use that info to try to influence whether I buy the store-brand generic at Kroger vs Sam's Club? My understanding is that the market for banner ads has mostly collapsed as a way to make money, what'll be the next fad after tracking metrics crashes?

  24. Never - Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm NEVER buying another TV, and that decision was made years ago. People who buy into this crap deserve everything they get.

    1. Re:Never - Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't you special. I bet you live on Google and Facebook.

    2. Re:Never - Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to buy a TV, dumbass. You buy a monitor. They show a picture. That's it. Smart features are trying to make thier way into them, but they aren't here yet.

  25. I see the big deal by swschrad · · Score: 1

    I have two smart TVs, so-called. they are not connected to the Internet. doing so exposes them to worms, viruses, and malware that the makers do not correct via updates. it also exposes "partner content" to my life. I get my content from $30 Roku boxes that are as replaceable as fuses if they get punked. I'm still smarter than my TVs.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  26. Fools. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

    You were a fool to buy these so-called 'smart' devices in the first place, and you're even more fools now for keeping them -- or at least for continuing to allow them access to the Internet. You claim you don't care about your own privacy, but in reality you at some point will, and in the meantime you're being inconsiderate of everyone else by encouraging these shitty companies to use every dirty trick they can to pry into everyone else's lives, too. Repent!

    1. Re:Fools. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      oh yeah because your computer that you're using to post on slashdot doesn't have ten times the issues as that smart TV.

      PFFFFFFtttttttttt!!!!!!!

  27. AI gone bad by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Watch World War II documentaries and you are a neo-Nazi. Watch Wentworth (Prisoner Cell Block H) and you were a closet lesbian. God help you if you watched both.

    Let me guess, you'd be officially outed as *being* Ilsa, the Werewolf Woman of the SS ?

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  28. He said "not uploaded" by DrYak · · Score: 2

    Not being tracked? Really?

    He explicitly said that Nothing he does will be uploaded !"
    He never mentioned whether this uploading won't happen because there's no tracking happening at all,
    or whether this uploading won't happen because these companies already track you to the bone on the cloud and thus there's no extra tracking information that needs to be uploaded.

    --

    The Firestick is an almost dumb device that displays remotely served content. It doesn't track much locally and doesn't upload much... because the Amazon Streaming server already tracks and knows everything about you.

    Amazon Alexa runs entirely on the cloud. The Amazon Echo device, is only a glorified internet streaming microphone+speaker combo. Beside recognizing a keyword ("Alexa !") it doesn't do much and is certainly unable to do tracking on its own ... because it's the giant AI behind Alexa on Amazon's cloud that knows everything about you up to your most secret desire.

    Facebook on your computer is just basically HTML, just content. (I'm over simplifying)
    All the horrible stuff that fills Mark Zuckerberg's pocket with cash happen on their servers. Be it the creepy stuff like face recognition image processing that they run on each single photo of you, even if you don't have a profile. Or the massive online behaviour monitoring : that "like" button might be a simple static image, but knowing *for which webpage* the FB servers were asked to serve it is the most interesting breadcrumbs path ever.

    ---

    in other words : Woosh

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  29. Samsung TV Privacy policy is impressively evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got it out of the box, read what it did, went back in the box.

  30. Coming Soon to TVs: LTE Modems by northerner · · Score: 1

    I expect TVs and appliances will soon have LTE cellular modems so they can collect consumer info without the need WiFi permissions. It will be close to impossible to turn them off.

    1. Re:Coming Soon to TVs: LTE Modems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I expect TVs and appliances will soon have LTE cellular modems so they can collect consumer info without the need WiFi permissions. It will be close to impossible to turn them off.

      Some "custom" TVs already have cellular modems. USA LEAs use them for brainwashing & gaslighting.

    2. Re:Coming Soon to TVs: LTE Modems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I expect TVs and appliances will soon have LTE cellular modems so they can collect consumer info without the need WiFi permissions. It will be close to impossible to turn them off.

      Wonder how well LTE would work with its antenna connected to ground?

    3. Re:Coming Soon to TVs: LTE Modems by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Those aren't free though. The consumer would have to pay a monthly fee and would notice pretty quickly.

      For the few customers who use a third party streaming device instead of using the "smarts" in the TV, they don't care. As long as they're collecting data from the other 99% they're happy. After all, they don't need LTE as long as the consumer hooks the TV up to some fat broadband for streamng.

    4. Re:Coming Soon to TVs: LTE Modems by northerner · · Score: 1

      >Those aren't free though. The consumer would have to pay a monthly fee and would notice pretty quickly.

      The manufacturer will pay the minimal cellular fee, not the consumer, because:
      1. They want to be in control of the account and data.
      2. It will be cheap in bulk with the new M2M services.
      3. They will make more from selling your information than the cellular bill.
      4. It will be always on when your TV is plugged in.

      That's similar to the cost model giving people get free cellular data with a wireless (non-WiFi) Kindle.
      So let's add...
      5. They will sell you stuff using that data link. (Enable new resolution modes, only $5. Surround sound output, $10.)

    5. Re:Coming Soon to TVs: LTE Modems by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Really? $9+ a month (price I pay at work for low bandwidth modem sim cards) will be less than they get by selling data? This still baffles me. How can someone's viewing habits be worth that much. Why aren't advertisers paying ME for this data? I'll turn off my adblock for $10/month.

      I think there's a dotcom like bubble going on yet again where companies are overestimating the value of advertising.

    6. Re:Coming Soon to TVs: LTE Modems by northerner · · Score: 1

      I expect it will be sub $1 per device per month for LTE-CatM (slow data 1MB/s) when you have lots of devices on a corporate account. I'm not sure how low it will go once LTE-CatM is mature and in widespread use.

      I have seen fast data-only tablet plans (no voice) for only $5/month with low data amounts (which can be OK for an IoT device).

    7. Re:Coming Soon to TVs: LTE Modems by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Ok, maybe our price is higher since it's in low volumes.

  31. It's the way it coerces you to agree that's v bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Every upgrade the TV gets this fucking thing tries to get you to agree to it by using several dialogues (if you keep choosing to tell it to fuck off) and with clever wording and button placements.

    This shit should be illegal and companies should be fined. Starting with Sony and/or Samba TV.

  32. So, it's a new SMB vulnerability? by sabbede · · Score: 1

    We are talking about a Samba privacy issue, right?

  33. Everybody must know by now by sad_ · · Score: 1

    This should come as no surprise; we can assume that every internet connected device spies on you.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.