Slashdot Mirror


Hawaii Bans Sunscreens That Hurt Coral Reefs (popularmechanics.com)

In early May, Hawaii lawmakers passed a bill that would prohibit the sale of over-the-counter sunscreens containing chemicals that contribute to the destruction of the state's coral reefs and other ocean life. Hawaii Governor David Ige signed the bill this week, making the ban official. Popular Mechanics reports: Hawaii is the first U.S. state to pass a legislation banning the sale of sunscreen containing [oxybenzone and octinoxate]. The bill will go into effect on January 1, 2021. "We are blessed in Hawaii to be home of some of the most beautiful natural resources on the planet," Ige said at the bill signing, according to The Huffington Post. "But our natural environment is fragile and our own interaction with the Earth can have everlasting impacts, and this bill is a small first step worldwide to really caring about our corals and our reefs in a way that no one else anywhere in the world has done."

A 2015 study conducted by scientists at the University of Central Florida found that oxybenzone, a common UV-filtering compound, kills the coral, causes DNA damage in the coral's adult stage, and deforms the DNA in the larval stage, hindering its development. A separate 2015 study, published in the Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology and conducted by biologist Craig Downs, also found that the chemicals produced water pollution and had damning effects on the coral reefs. In 2012, Women's Health reported that oxybenzone and octinoxate may actually be harmful to humans as well, not just coral reefs. According to the publication, when the skin absorbs oxybenzone, it can cause an eczema-like allergic reaction and disrupt hormone levels. Octinoxate may damage skin cells and lead to premature aging.

24 of 65 comments (clear)

  1. Good move by oblom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sunscreen is only one factor out of several, but you have to start somewhere.

    1. Re:Good move by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Having your sunscreen recalled in the state of Hawaii does not constitute a birth condition.

    2. Re:Good move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      won't be banned until 2021.

      they didn't start anything.

    3. Re: Good move by valnar · · Score: 1

      I grew up in Kailua and had fond memories of Hawaii but after going back to visit years later, I'm glad I left. Homeless, car congestion, crime... But then, I was a haole.

    4. Re:Good move by Immerman · · Score: 2

      We live in a capitalist society - have to give the capitalists time to dump their inventory without losing money. Why should they be punished when they did nothing wrong?

      I mean, other than choosing to sell products known to kill coral. But nothing BAD, like depriving shareholders of profits or providing insufficient political contributions.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  2. Re:Rediculus by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    TFS links to a study (well, an article about a study at least) that suggests that researchers did show that those particular chemicals were harmful to coral reefs. Maybe you could argue that the amounts needed to be harmful exceed what a reef would ever be exposed to, but it seems it does cause problems.

    Hawaii has several coral-lined bays where they don't permit boats. Their exposure to oil, fuel, etc. would be quite minimal relative to other reefs. However, they do see a large number of tourists, many of whom will be wearing sunscreen.

    And before someone goes off about people getting skin cancer, there are several types of sunscreen that don't use either chemical and are available in high-SPF varieties. I'm not sure how easy it will be to enforce any of this. The last time I was in Hawaii there was plenty of litter on some of their beaches. If people can't even be expected to pick up after themselves, they won't be bothered to make sure they're not using the wrong kind of sunscreen.

  3. Excuse me, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Excuse me, but the plural of reef is reeves.

    1. Re:Excuse me, but by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Funny

      Reavers, and they've been officially denied by the alliance, much as the anthropogenic malady that plagues the bluest planet.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  4. Re:Rediculus by EmeraldBot · · Score: 1

    Most of the people who litter are tourists, not locals, and this law doesn't apply to them I believe. Hawaii won't prevent you from bringing your sunscreen from the mainland in, it'll simply prevent you from buying that sunscreen in Hawaii.

    --
    "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
  5. coral safe sunscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    First time I used coral safe sunscreen, I discovered the nuclear option. Titanium dioxide was the main ingredient. Put it on and spent hours in the water fishing. I was as white as ever when I washed it off. Not a bit of tanning from solar exposure. None. It's not the sexy option. You will look pasty white if you use it. Ultraviolet will not get through. You could probably survive being stuck in a microwave. Okay, maybe not but seriiusly, you won't get burned by the sun. Costs a few extra $, but worth it.

    1. Re:coral safe sunscreen by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      First time I used coral safe sunscreen, I discovered the nuclear option. Titanium dioxide was the main ingredient. Put it on and spent hours in the water fishing. I was as white as ever when I washed it off. Not a bit of tanning from solar exposure. None. It's not the sexy option.

      Just do what I do: Use titanium dioxide and paint your face like a Juggalo. You will not only be protected from the harming rays, but you'll get all the girls. Well, not "all", but the ones who have really bad self-image. Which are basically the only ones we're going to get anyway, so... But at least you won't have to worry about skin cancer!

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:coral safe sunscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Plus you won't be recognized by the facial recognition cameras!

  6. Re:Rediculus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Most of the people who litter are tourists, not locals, and this law doesn't apply to them I believe. Hawaii won't prevent you from bringing your sunscreen from the mainland in, it'll simply prevent you from buying that sunscreen in Hawaii.

    You do know that Hawaii has special permission to search your bags in and out of the state, even on domestic flights? They have enormous issues with non-native species and searching baggage is the only way to stop it. So Yes, they can take your non-compliant sun screen from you.

  7. Re:PopeRatzo = fake name massive human fail by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    APK

    Gee, brother. I thought we were just getting to be friends. You've hurt me now, and I've done nothing to you.

    I think you should leave.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  8. Ugh by Dripdry · · Score: 1

    Checked a bunch of spray on sunscreen? Both chemicals. Been using the stuff for years... Makes me wonder what I've been doing to my body.

    --
    -
    1. Re: Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Look at any that aren't zinc based and have spf 50 or higher. Specifically, look at kids and baby products. You see them in almost all of that subset.

    2. Re: Ugh by PPH · · Score: 1

      look at kids and baby products

      But are those made from real babies?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  9. Bigger fish to fry by hambone142 · · Score: 1

    How about banning fluffy-haired real estate agents pimping the property values to the level where native Hawaiians can afford to buy?

    Most are forced to live inland in shantys.

    1. Re:Bigger fish to fry by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The people you think of as native Hawaiians found someone else living there when they got there. They killed and maybe ate them.

      The notion that someone is entitled to land because they were there "first" is as ridiculous as the notion that it's okay to treat people badly because you have more guns than they do.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Bigger fish to fry by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Bigger fish to fry

      NO FFS No. You know ewhat happens when people succeed wiht the premise that we shouldn't fix X because Y is more important? You eng up with neither fixed.

      How about...

      Do that too, but don't not do this one.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:Bigger fish to fry by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Except in terms of colonization, Hawaii was settled for the first time at a distinct point in history.

      Right, by people who preceded the people you think of as Hawaiian natives.

      Property rights come from occupation of land, so they own it first.

      Wrong. Rights come from power. There's no such thing as inherent human rights. That's why we have to defend each one that we care about, or lose it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. Re: Rediculus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Probably not that hard. Given TSA restrictions on liquids and gels tourists probably mostly just buy sunscreen when they get there and locals obviously aren't exactly likely to pick any up just over the state line. So if you get the stuff off the store shelves you are probably 90% there. You're only problem then is the few who order sunscreen online and that probably isn't a huge environmental impact

  11. Re:Rediculus by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    What's killing the coral reefs is all the boat oil, fuel, etc. leakages and exhaust venting into the ocean.

    I know. Guns don't kill people. Car accidents, and smoking kills people. It's absurd to think there could be anything else contributing to death.

  12. Re:PopeRatzo = fake name massive human fail by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

    PopeRatzo = fake name

    Aw shit! I thought he was a real Pope.

    Ratzo mate, you're dead to me now.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.