Slashdot Mirror


AT&T Wants To Overhaul HBO, Says It Isn't Profitable Enough (arstechnica.com)

AT&T recently acquired HBO, as part of the Time Warner acquisition, "and it is already considering an overhaul that would see HBO produce more video that can compete for the attention of smartphone users," reports Ars Technica. "AT&T wants to boost revenue both in advertising and subscriptions, even if that means upending HBO's longtime strategy of producing a relatively small number of high-quality shows."

At a recent corporate town hall meeting, John Stankey, the longtime AT&T executive and new head of Warner Media, laid out the challenges and opportunities he saw for the network to around 150 employees. He said, in part: "It's going to be a tough year. It's going to be a lot of work to alter and change direction a little bit. [...] You will work very hard, and this next year will -- my wife hates it when I say this -- feel like childbirth... You'll look back on it and be very fond of it, but it's not going to feel great while you're in the middle of it. She says, 'What do you know about this?' I just observe, 'Honey. We love our kids.'" Audio of the meeting was obtained by The New York Times. From the report: The talk, held at HBO headquarters in New York City, was hosted by HBO CEO Richard Plepler. HBO must compete with smartphones for people's attention, Stankey said in this exchange with Plepler: "We need hours a day," Mr. Stankey said, referring to the time viewers spend watching HBO programs. "It's not hours a week, and it's not hours a month. We need hours a day. You are competing with devices that sit in people's hands that capture their attention every 15 minutes." Continuing the theme, he added: "I want more hours of engagement. Why are more hours of engagement important? Because you get more data and information about a customer that then allows you to do things like monetize through alternate models of advertising as well as subscriptions, which I think is very important to play in tomorrow's world."

17 of 290 comments (clear)

  1. If it ain't broke, fix it by AlanBDee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    sigh!

    1. Re:If it ain't broke, fix it by JMJimmy · · Score: 5, Informative

      $4 billion profit on $2 billion investment per year isn't profitable enough?

    2. Re:If it ain't broke, fix it by JMJimmy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Acquisition was $80 billion... AT&T overpaid by $20 billion so it's got to get the money from somewhere I guess

  2. Here comes president Camacho by RickyShade · · Score: 5, Funny

    "OW! MY BALLS!" will premier on AT&T's HBO.

  3. God damnit AT&T. by Narcocide · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Overhaul your fucking network first. How come you can't provide more than 1 megabit of upload bandwidth even in the middle of the most densely-populated and theoretically profitable areas in the US? South Korea has 100 megabit synchronous fiber connections running to houses with dirt fucking floors! What the fuck is wrong with you assholes?

    1. Re:God damnit AT&T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      uploading is just for those evil pirates and server admins. good little consumers only CONSUME pre approved content.

      you're not being a good little consumer. a note has been made in your account.

    2. Re: God damnit AT&T. by jpaine619 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The only way that people like your mother are going to get served high speed broadband is if Americans vote to increase their taxes and have the government subsidize it, as they have done in Korea and elsewhere, but Americans have a special hatred of taxes going back to the founding of their nation so that doesn't seem likely either.

      I'm not picking on you, honest, but it's this kind of logic that drives me nuts. The idea that the government has to "make it happen". It's ... dumb.

      You want high-speed internet in areas the big guys don't want to serve? Simple.. Remove the obstacles that make it so damn difficult for us little guys to do it. i.e. remove all of those laws that were passed to PROTECT the incumbents.

      I cover 100 sq miles of rural San Diego County with very reliable (and inexpensive) internet. But.. it's a goddamn battle every single day to expand further. The amount of red-tape would blow your mind. I know.. it's CA, but for fuck's sake....

      We do not have Capitalism in the United States. We have Cronyism and Protectionism.

      There is no reason, whatsoever, that the government should be protecting AT&T's rural monopolies. But, that's what we have and that's why a lot of people have no access to decent internet.

    3. Re: God damnit AT&T. by mr_jrt · · Score: 5, Informative

      You were doing so well until the nonsense about Nazis. I really don't get the American ignorance about Socialism, I really don't.

      Educate yourself:
      https://www.indy100.com/articl...
      https://www.snopes.com/news/20...
      http://www.newsweek.com/nazis-...

      It's really not that hard.

      --
      Boo.
  4. Quick translation guide by StandardCell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You will work very hard, and this next year will -- my wife hates it when I say this -- feel like childbirth... - you will work 80+ hour weeks for at least the next year with no additional bonuses for anyone lower than VP level, so good luck keeping your personal life intact!

    You'll look back on it and be very fond of it, but it's not going to feel great while you're in the middle of it. - if you don't get fired or quit, you get a gold star for making it through!

    She says, 'What do you know about this?' I just observe, 'Honey. We love our kids. - The kids are going to feel pain and stress to toughen them up and be ready for anything in the real world!

    (I wish the existing employees luck. Things were already insanely busy at HBO.)

    1. Re:Quick translation guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, this is a bonehead move. Anyone with talent is just going to pick up and leave to new, innovative competitors like Netflix. Or Amazon. Or Google. Or anyone else not run by some sluggish vertical monopoly willing fuck up a sure thing.

      HBO's properties will wither and die if mismanaged but there's no shortage of good companies willing to pay to crank out good content.

    2. Re:Quick translation guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And just like childbirth, someone else will do all the hard stuff while he takes all the credit.

    3. Re:Quick translation guide by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've heard these speeches before. They often proceed layoffs the second year.
      So the company works you to death (in our case literally for one person and non-fatal heart attacks for five others plus the one unconscious contractor who we never found out what happened) and to divorce (a half dozen divorces) and *then* laid 95% of the staff off .

      HBO is going to suck terribly.

      It's like corporations have gone in sane and are taking hatchets to their own golden gooses.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  5. This is a fancy way to say layoffs by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    which you get with each and every merger. This is why we should stop allowing mega mergers. Big mergers are expensive and what's the first thing you do when you spend a bunch of money on a business expense? Try to make it back. Mergers destroy jobs.

    This was another good reason to oppose the Trump tax cuts. The mega-corps already said the money was all going to mergers and stock buybacks. The sort of thing that doesn't create jobs, it destroys them. Heck, it's easy to see why supply side economics fail. Businesses spend money to meet demand. Giving businesses more money does just that, gives them more money. Unless there's more demand they're just going to keep it. And if there's more demand they'll spend the money anyway. Yeah, there's a point where kleptocracy can kick in and choke a business, but you'd be surprised how far up that goes. Meanwhile the working class is choked with low wages and demand for everything is flat. Flat demand, flat job and wage growth.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  6. In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    AT&T have decided to ruin one of the most successful brands in entertainment.

    Right now, HBO competes and holds its own against Netflix and Amazon, both of which continue to invest and profit st their expense. Rather than compete, HBO plans to cede this ground, kill the goose laying the golden eggs, and bet it all on a strategy that takes them out if a market they excel at and run head first into one they donâ(TM)t understand and are ill equipped to compete in.

    Thereâ(TM)s not a âoeplan Bâ here - once todayâ(TM)s creators abandon the HBO platform (which theyâ(TM)ll do in a heartbeat), thereâ(TM)s no going back if they change their minds later.

  7. Interesting, sparks will fly indeed by ErichTheRed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess this is what happens when a communications executive takes over a bunch of creatives. I live near NYC and it's nothing like LA, but the entertainment work scene here is pretty much the opposite of AT&T. It's not quite Don Draper 3-martini lunches but former colleagues of mine who now work in that business say it's pretty close. People are creative and used to having a fair amount of freedom around the way they get the job done.

    When a creative company gets acquired by someone who just wants to squeeze it for all it's worth, they'll probably lose some of their better creative talent...those folks have options. AT&T is used to providing a cheap-to-deploy, incredibly high margin service. Once they start cracking the whip, the content quality is going to drop. I imagine the first thing they'll do is offshore every business process that isn't outsourced already. When that doesn't produce the savings, they're going to start cutting into the creatives' budget. No more personal assistants, free car service, free food, expense account dinners, etc.

  8. AT&T will slaughter that Golden Goose by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did anyone not expect this? A cellular company bought HBO and their first thought is episodes are too long and everyone wants to watch them on their phone. Oh and they want to add advertising, forgetting of course that most of HBO's subscribers do so because it DOESN'T have advertising.

    They'll kill HBO with these plans before they ever evolve them to compete with Netflix. AT&T will slaughter the goose.

  9. Weird to get an upfront "We're tanking" message by HeckRuler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm more used to corporations doing a more subtle bait and switch game where they grow their popularity with quality products and then try and cut costs as subtly as possible. Outsourcing to China, using cheaper meat, getting rid of what their warranty covers.

    Having a CEO just come out and say "We're going to send this channel straight into the shitter" right to our face is just a weird amount of honesty. I mean, they coach it in positive terms as PR people are ought to do. But even they acknowledge it's going to be painful.

    HBO targeting PHONE audiences. So.... Westworld, but cut down to 6 second VINE clips. Season 10 of Game of Thrones will be flash animation with 3 characters remaining after the killing of the rest. And it won't be the expensive ones.