Slashdot Mirror


In World First, Danish Court Rules Stream-Ripping Site Illegal

An anonymous reader shares a report: Convert2MP3 is a site that allows users to download audio from platforms including YouTube. Following legal action carried out by Rights Alliance on behalf of music industry group IFPI, Convert2MP3 has been declared unlawful by a Danish court which has now ordered ISPs to block it. It's the first time worldwide that a so-called stream-ripping site has been declared illegal.

88 comments

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. Weird by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Is that a final decision, or an appeal is on the way? Also the "alliance" doesn't attack the source directly [ youtube ] but some indirect folks that just press the available oranges and give users some juice ... weird. Did that alliance assess how much good youtube does to them, by popularizing so many new songs (and remind people of older ones) that would otherwise remain in the dark forever?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:Weird by elgaard · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is from the Frederiksberg court.
      It is not final. But most likely the alliance won because the people behind Convert2mp3 did not bother to show up in a Danish court. And they probable also will not appeal. The transcripts from the court is not made public yet as far is I know.

  3. Stream ripping = home taping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can't plug the analog hole.

    1. Re:Stream ripping = home taping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure about that... most people I know don't have a recording solution anymore. Hell, the VCR is dead and useless.

    2. Re:Stream ripping = home taping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB-c

  4. Filled with Jelly = Not Serious by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> Danish Court

    How does one take a judge or jury filled with jelly seriously?

    1. Re:Filled with Jelly = Not Serious by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      Oh you...

      --
      I tend to rant.
    2. Re:Filled with Jelly = Not Serious by avandesande · · Score: 1

      They didn't take blancmanges seriously either until they won Wimbledon!

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  5. Conversion not allowed in my country since a month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used Convert2MP3 site to extract audio from YouTube videos but about one month ago or so I started getting the message "An error occurred: We are sorry. Converting music videos from YouTube is not possible in your territory / region." So I thought the SGAE (spanish version of the RIAA) was involved. A pity because it was a great site that also allowed you to edit some MP3 tags.

  6. Surprised it took this long by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised it took this long. With all the clout record companies have, I'm surprised it took them this long to find a country to make this illegal in. The surprise here, isnt' that it is illegal somewhere. The surprise is it took this long TO BE illegal somewhere.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  7. Re:That's a good thing by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

    The other day I was in San Jose as a tourist and took a bus. A rather large fellow sitting next to me asked me if he could "rip a stream" and before I knew it, he lifted a leg and I had to change buses immediately.

    Sorry, I wondered why you left!

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. Which should surprise nobody ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is pretty much the only way this would have played out as far as I can see.

    You run a site, which converts someone else's content into a form that your users can download ... pretty much blatant copyright infringement, isn't it?

    Oh, sure, the "yarg fuck the copyright" crowd will say they have a right to convert anything into a form for later use, but I'm not sure I'd agree.

    Where I live, ripping a CD I own to MP3 is perfectly legal.

    But format shifting from 3rd party sites is an entirely different animal, because what you're providing is a service to turn someone else's stuff into something your users can download.

    The copyright lobby are assholes, but this is pretty much the only way I can see that specific case going. The entire reason for this site was to convert stuff they had no legal rights to for someone who also didn't have legal rights to it.

    1. Re:Which should surprise nobody ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      At the end of TFA, the Rights Alliance lawyer states:

      “After the conversion process Convert2MP3 saves a copy on their servers in France for at least 4 hours.”

      Instead of providing just real-time format conversion and sending it downstream to the user, Convert2MP3 stores a copy of the stream on its servers probably as cached data to be used for other requests of the same song. That's copyright infringement plain and simple.

      And apparently Convert2MP3 just thought they could just ignore problem and didn't even bother to mount any kind legal defense which all but guaranteed that they would lose in court. So, yeah, none of this is surprising.

    2. Re:Which should surprise nobody ... by butchersong · · Score: 1

      That makes things a bit clearer. Thanks.

    3. Re:Which should surprise nobody ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no,

      you are not providing a service to turn someone else's stuff into something your users can download

      you are providing a service to convert the download someone else provided into a format more convenient for your and their users

  10. Re:Conversion not allowed in my country since a mo by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    Why not just use youtube-dl like everyone else?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  11. Do we have a Danish lawyer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On what grounds is this declared illegal?

    And on what grounds is having ISPs censor their customers' access a reasonable fix for other parties' declared illegality?

    Both have rather far-reaching consequences that I'm sure the judge didn't consider, but it'd still be (Chinesely) interesting to hear the reasoning.

  12. Audacity by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's trivial to do this locally using Audacity. Send the output through the sound chip and save when done.

    1. Re:Audacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try explaining that to my grandfather...

    2. Re:Audacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      your grandfather most likely know how to use a tape recorder pretty much same thing

    3. Re:Audacity by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      If he knows how to use the ripping sites, audacity shouldn't be much more difficult

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    4. Re:Audacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I usually split off the aac from the mp4 that youtube deliberately places onto my computer.

      But I suppose yours adds an extra layer to the already bloated pile of realities that factually defy the various mafiAA fictions.

  13. Home Taping Is Killing Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That was the music industry's campaign slogan int the 80s. They failed to kill home taping* and despite home taping continuing well into the 90s, they enjoyed their most commercially successful decades ever.

    *) Home taping was the practice of recording music streams (from the radio, to music cassettes).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Taping_Is_Killing_Music

    1. Re:Home Taping Is Killing Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the music industry's campaign slogan int the 80s. They failed to kill home taping* and despite home taping continuing well into the 90s, they enjoyed their most commercially successful decades ever.

      *) Home taping was the practice of recording music streams (from the radio, to music cassettes).

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Taping_Is_Killing_Music

      You forget (or maybe never knew) that cassettes are "taxed" in the USA - there is a fee added to their sale price that is sent to the RIAA to *cough* *cough* distribute to the artists. Same with CD blanks, I believe, and I think it's there to this day.

  14. Let's see.. by Dwedit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's see... We have a web service that grabs copyrighted material from a third-party website, then distributes a mechanically-derived work of that copyrighted material... Sounds about right.

    Needs to be client-side to avoid the step of redistribution.

    1. Re:Let's see.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Client side has always been easier anyway.
      youtubedl --extract-audio --audio-format mp3 [url]

      Captcha: melody

    2. Re:Let's see.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even easier if you use mps-youtube. It's an interactive shell client for YouTube.

    3. Re:Let's see.. by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Let's see... We have a web service that grabs copyrighted material from a third-party website, then distributes a mechanically-derived work of that copyrighted material... Sounds about right.

      Needs to be client-side to avoid the step of redistribution.

      What if you package it as a "cloud" program?

      Is MS on the hook if I paste a Disney character into a Word doc, using their cloud version of Office?

    4. Re:Let's see.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see... We have a web service that grabs copyrighted material from a third-party website, then distributes a mechanically-derived work of that copyrighted material... Sounds about right.

      Needs to be client-side to avoid the step of redistribution.

      Every router, every switch, every firewall, every proxy, VPN, memory controller, cloud service, load balancer, everything that has an interface on or to a packet network does this.

      Might as well punish people for making unauthorized copies of a website because it was on their network, in their router, in their NIC, RAM, video card, web cache, and possibly swap file. That is a huge amount of unauthorized copies.

    5. Re:Let's see.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that directly sending data from the original source to the client, which then performs the conversion, does avoid the step of redistribution. That's not obviously violating laws the way stream-ripping sites seem to. However, the goal of the music industry seems to be more about stopping stream-ripping altogether than about stopping redistribution through third party sites. I assume that the converted copy is stored in a cache that's periodically purged. This seems like a technicality to declare such sites illegal under existing law, with the real goal being to stop stream-ripping altogether. It's conceivable that laws could be created to make software like youtube-dl illegal in much the same way that DeCSS was targeted and libdvdcss is of questionable legality.

      I see a number of legitimate reasons why users would rip streams:
      1) For metered and throttled connections, it makes sense to download the content once rather than streaming each time it's played.
      2) Many paid sources of content are subject to walled garden lock-in and DRM.
      3) Streaming content may not be available at a future date and users want to ensure the ability to time shift their viewing or listening. Some TV networks make shows freely available for streaming during a limited period of time, then remove the content. In some cases, that content isn't even available for purchase later on.

      Piracy and stream-ripping are responses to the greed of internet providers and copyright holders. Because the film and music industries seem to have powerful lobbies, it's not above them to try to prohibit stream-ripping. At least here in the US, it seems like stream-ripping doesn't violate the DMCA and ToS violations (e.g., Youtube) aren't covered by the CFAA. Unfortunately, it wouldn't surprise me at all if the copyright lobby tried to get all stream-ripping explicitly outlawed.

    6. Re:Let's see.. by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      Google Translate does the same thing.

    7. Re:Let's see.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS need not fear accusations of infringement, but for the same reason that The Biggest Pirate Ever doesn't worry about it.

      Hint: TBPE is the world's most popular video site

      Seriously though, someone answer the question. I'm willing to accept that only a local, client-side processor is valid, but then MS is the one who performed the operation above.

    8. Re:Let's see.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Translate is two steps away from utter shit. But, yea, it's also violating copyright. No one bothers going after them currently because the economic loss just isn't worth it vs the cost. It's pretty radically different for streaming sites that function on the presumption they can sell/display ads and some third party entirely bypasses that.

    9. Re:Let's see.. by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      MS need not fear accusations of infringement, but for the same reason that The Biggest Pirate Ever doesn't worry about it.

      Hint: TBPE is the world's most popular video site

      Seriously though, someone answer the question. I'm willing to accept that only a local, client-side processor is valid, but then MS is the one who performed the operation above.

      Texas Board of Professional Engineers?

    10. Re:Let's see.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A web service that downloads a publicly accessible file with no access controls or DRM from a public-facing website that sends the information for free and then translates the compression format of that file, all at the request of a human user. YouTube is doing the distribution; the download service is only translating the data format for a single publicly accessible unrestricted data file. It's not offering it up to everyone that asks; it's not any different than asking someone to change a PNG file you found on a web page to a JPEG for you. A clear-cut case of fair use.

  15. Re:Conversion not allowed in my country since a mo by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Not all the dl apps work on all the clips as expected.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  16. Re:That's a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... they'll have to use a VPN now?

    Captcha: Override

  17. Re:Conversion not allowed in my country since a mo by houghi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just download one of the many rippers available. For Linux there is youtube-dl
    And here is the code you can use:
    youtube-dl --extract-audio --audio-format mp3

    Most ripping sites where just a shell arround youtube-dl anyway and as such limited the program to just a few options.

    As you now have the source, you will be able to build your own website that does the same. With little ingenuity, you can have a bookmark in your browser and when you click it when you are on YouTube, it will start downloading to the directory of your choice.

    Editing of MP3 can then be done with any MP3 editing program you desire,

    You are on /. Behave like it. Now get of my lawn.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  18. VAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they should point out that legitimate content can be Convert2MP3 and that it's what the user is doing may be infringing, but they can't control what the user does with their software. This smells like a red herring.

  19. Jurisdiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Danish Court does NOT have "World-Wide" jurisdiction, perhaps it only applies within Denmark. Where is it hosted? That's important.

    1. Re:Jurisdiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The decision of the Danish court against Convert2MP3 is likely to be referenced in future blocking cases around Europe, where stream-ripping is seen as a major threat to the recording industries and more serious than traditional peer-to-peer piracy."

      It'll likely be used by other EU members' courts.

    2. Re:Jurisdiction by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Nowhere in the summary or article does it say world wide, it says world FIRST.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    3. Re:Jurisdiction by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Ah yes progressive Europe, where memes were almost made illegal due to copyright filters.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  20. For those that disagree by houghi · · Score: 2

    You canb take action now. You are on /. so you have some Internet knowledge.

    Build a website around https://rg3.github.io/youtube-dl/. Not that hard to do. Should be up and running in around an hour.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:For those that disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can contribute to society instead of leeching from it in your mom's basement

    2. Re:For those that disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh! you can download youtube videos and save audio tracks to mp3. Any one else see the Streisand effect here.

    3. Re:For those that disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

  21. Re:Conversion not allowed in my country since a mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, but the SGAE in Spain does not really want to forbid things. They want to be able to extort money from everybody.

  22. Things never change by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    Sites like YouTube, which offer millions of copies of almost every song imaginable, are now an unwitting player in the piracy ecosystem. Every day, countless people use special tools to extract music from video tracks before storing them on their local machines.

    So, people are still taping FM radio, huh?

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:Things never change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The audacity of calling Youtube an "unwitting player" in the piracy ecosystem! When Google bought Youtube, many people were scratching their heads about the purpose of that acquisition, because everybody knew that Youtube had tons of videos which were blatant copyright violations, and that was long before Google coerced every rights holder on the planet into giving Youtube dirt cheap licensing contracts.

  23. Re:Treason is illegal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must ask, do you not even fit in over at 4chan?

  24. Having the cake and eating it too by Misagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Meanwhile, Denmark has its "båndkopi" (tape copy) fee on practically all storage media -- whether it is being used for music or not -- to compensate for copying.
    The collected money is distributed to a select number of rights holders through some scheme by the industry organisation Copydan.

    The "båndkopi" fee was created once upon a time because the music industry complained that people could copy music to tapes from records and the radio ...
    And now that Youtube and other streaming services are basically serving the same function that radio did, things are different?

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Having the cake and eating it too by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Informative

      We got the same. In any other context something like this would be illegal. You're paying a fee on every medium, but at the same time copying anything that says that it has a copy protection (needn't even have one, just claiming to have one is enough) means you must not copy it.

      Now tell me, what kind of content am I supposed to put on the medium that I just paid for to be allowed to put content on that I'm not allowed to put on.

      Dear content industry: Go and die a quick and preferably painful, but I'd settle for just quick, death. Nobody needs you anymore. You're, essentially, a useless sponge on society in general and creative creators in particular. The faster you cease to exist, the better for all of us.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Having the cake and eating it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now tell me, what kind of content am I supposed to put on the medium that I[b] just paid for to be allowed to put content on[/b] that I'm not allowed to put on.

      The "fee" you paid isn't a licensing fee. It doesn't give you the right to put copyrighted material on that medium. Nor does the law say anywhere that such is its function. It is more like a tax. It doesn't make copying copyrighted material lawful for you if you haven't actually acquired a license from the affected copyright holders.

    3. Re:Having the cake and eating it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'all trying to say båndkopi? You're welcome.

    4. Re:Having the cake and eating it too by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Then what is it for? And please don't give me the "to compensate for losses due to copies", how can you possibly justify blanket punishment of everyone for a crime a handful of people commit? Do you get to pay a "robbery fee" on guns now? Is there a "getaway car tax" on new vehicles? Or how about all men paying a "rapist victim compensation" for having the relevant equipment?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. Re:Conversion not allowed in my country since a mo by BlueStrat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ah, but the SGAE in Spain does not really want to forbid things. They want to be able to extort money from everybody.

    Nobody expects the Spanish Requisition!

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  26. But what is the point of using a site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A stream and a download are the exact same thing. Only that when it says "stream", your CPU decides to forget where it was downoaded to right after.
    Because that is what the instructions say that you, the user, decided to give it.

    Which is a pretty damn stupid decision, if you planned on keeping it, and are actually the computer user. (As opposed to merely a user of appliances made with computers.)

    This proves again, that most "solutions" we use today, exist solely to circumvent an already retarded base. Like having a fridge in your heated log cabin inside of a ski hall in Dubai "because" it's too warm in said cabin.

  27. GOOD - get rid of these sites by gosand · · Score: 1

    These sites should be blocked, they are too high profile and obvious.
    There are plenty of other solutions to download and convert locally, and they can do their business in peace.

    p.s. 10 more conversions sites just popped up to take the place of Convert2MP3.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  28. Eww, who fills pastry with jelly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean vanillla paste, vanilla paste...!

    Damn, now he stuffs it with cuttlefish and asparagus!

  29. Re:Conversion not allowed in my country since a mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously don't use youtube-dl.

  30. Re:Conversion not allowed in my country since a mo by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    An example, please?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  31. Re:Conversion not allowed in my country since a mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Liar.

  32. Do as I do. by Catbeller · · Score: 0

    I haven't bought a single piece of music since 1999, when the music industry shut down Napster.
    Never will again.
    Don't collect music, either. Don't miss it.
    Please join me in refusnik.
    Not a single centavo for the industry that steals every penny off of artists.

  33. Re: Relative Measures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah old shithole America, where even nice white Australian ladies get murdered by the Police after asking for their help. Such a better prison is the land of the freedumbs!

  34. Leeching? You mean like what copyright literally i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole, entire, and only point of copyright, is for distributors to leech on creative people and steal their and our money (mostly for cocaine and whores) while not working one fucking bit in their lives, except to avoid working by making you work for them.

    That kind of leeching you mean?

    Or the one where I go "If you haven't worked for it, then you won't get any money, cause I have actually worked for that, you piece of shit!"?

    How evil of me, to not let you steal from me!

  35. oh so you can only glance at the streams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as many times as you want to, you just can't store it.

    shoot the lawyers goddamit

  36. Re:Conversion not allowed in my country since a mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But but... clearly he's talking about the youtube-dl app store! I have that on my iDroid phone!

  37. Re: Relative Measures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time i checked, American wasn't on the "Shithole Country" list.. Australia, subject of Queen Queefabeth on the other hand..

  38. Re:Conversion not allowed in my country since a mo by dinfinity · · Score: 1

    Yep. Exists on Windows as well:
    https://chocolatey.org/package...

    (Chocolatey is a godsend, btw)

  39. Those sites are just front ends for youtube-dl. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those sites don't do anything that youtube-dl can't do. If there are audio files, it's because YouTube or Twitch have separate audio files on their servers. These sites are basically just giving the user a link to data on YouTube/Twitch's servers.

  40. Re:Conversion not allowed in my country since a mo by Cederic · · Score: 0

    From the page you linked:

    This package was approved as a trusted package on 7/10/2018.

    Yeah, I'm really going to trust some fuckwit site that approves things in the future.

  41. Most videos are uploaded by the industry itself! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are aware of that, yes?
    Warner was even caught red-handed.

    Because that advertisement makes them money.

    Not that those criminal cokehead Mafia cunts at tha media industry would ever fuckin work a single day for that money. Or give any non-negligible amount of to the actual creative people. (Who get their money from concerts and advertisement.)

    After all, copyright is a distributor's privilege to an imaginary monopoly and protection money. NOT an artist's.

  42. Re: Relative Measures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your list is old.

    The US has enjoyed shithole status since the mid to late 80's.

    Go drive through Detroit, or get sick, or both !

  43. Re:That's a good thing by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Fattist.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  44. Re:Leeching? You mean like what copyright literall by omnichad · · Score: 1

    You can self-distribute. It's easier than ever. But access to a good advertising budget is mutually beneficial for the distributor and content creator in most cases. Is not much different than a VC investing in a startup. They're doing nothing creative, but taking the majority of the financial risk - and then get the majority of the financial reward. The startup would likely never have made money at all without help to stay afloat.

  45. Trivial to mark them illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The youtube authors are only giving youtube a license to the content to be used in youtube's platform, so moving the data outside of youtube's network is not allowed. That would give clear warning to the authors of these conversion sites.. If they can't see that problem while reading youtubes TOS, then they haven't done their homework too well.

    Of course youtube has some interface which allows downloading the data, but the license granted to youtube doesnt really allow moving it outside of youtube's system. So dunno what kind of hacks these sites need to do to get access to the data files.

  46. Re: Leeching? You mean like what copyright literal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > cocaine and whores

    It's pronounced hookers and blow.

  47. Re:Conversion not allowed in my country since a mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    newpipe on android (get it from f-droid)

  48. Re:Conversion not allowed in my country since a mo by dinfinity · · Score: 0

    US date formatting is retarded.

  49. Re:Conversion not allowed in my country since a mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correct, it should be YYYY/mm/dd

  50. Re:Conversion not allowed in my country since a mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please re-read parent post. He did make a perfectly logic and valid sentence.