Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Confirms That It Will No Longer Activate 3G Phones (droid-life.com)

According to Droid Life, Verizon is no longer activating 3G-only phones. Instead, they will only accept 4G LTE-equipped phones going forward. Here's what Verizon had to say about the matter: "For several years we've been been publicly saying that our 3G CDMA network will remain available through the end of 2019. Virtually all traffic on our network is on our 4G LTE network. To facilitate a smooth transition to 4G LTE capable products and services, we are no longer allowing devices that are not 4G LTE capable to be activated on our network." From the report: Now, as is noted in the statement above, Verizon has committed to shutting down its 3G CDMA network by the end of 2019. They also stopped selling 3G devices some time ago, I believe, and even started selling LTE-only flip phones to replace them. [...] On a related note, an earlier leak suggested that Verizon may stop some older LTE devices from being activated too. The documentation there said that CDMA devices as well as devices that do not support HD Voice or VoLTE will not be accepted.

65 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. Data logging by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

    I use 2G and 3G systems for my data logging projects. They are much cheaper. Eventually I am afraid I will need to use a full 4G LTE system (at least in the US).

    1. Re:Data logging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you managed to deal with moving from telegraph to telephone, I'm sure you'll handle this transition as well.

    2. Re:Data logging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For your use case, rather than full LTE, using LTE-M (AT&T, Verizon) or NB-IOT (T-mobile) might be useful. Other technologies are Lora and Sigfox. All of these are low throughput, and low energy. Lora and SigFox use unlicensed spectrum, with all the associated benefits and drawbacks. (Also, although the spectrum is unlicensed, the devices themselves do comply with restrictions e.g. duty cycle).

    3. Re:Data logging by mjwx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I use 2G and 3G systems for my data logging projects. They are much cheaper. Eventually I am afraid I will need to use a full 4G LTE system (at least in the US).

      As you specified "at least in the US" you're probably living in a country that chose GSM from the very begining. Verizon does not have a "3G" GSM network such as HSPA, they went with CDMA which was a slower, more dead end technology. They're one of the last networks to get rid of it.

      If you want to use 3G GSM devices in the US, you need to go with AT&T as they're the only company that implemented an internationally compatible version of 3G GSM.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:Data logging by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1, Informative

      CDMA is not dead. Current LTE is a more advanced version of CDMA and called something else because Qualcomm submitted it to a standards body.

      Verizon's CDMA was designed for voice and data was added on as a second thought. While modern versions of CDMA are designed for data and voice.

      what you call GSM is the old voice only TDMA tech which was competing with CDMA for voice

    5. Re:Data logging by vtcodger · · Score: 4, Informative

      Telegraphs and telephones largely do different things. Roughly, telephony is voice. Telegraphy is text. The two existed in parallel for about a century. What killed telegraphy wasn't telephony. It was satellite communications,the Internet, and the widespread availability of PCs and modems that allowed cheap, reliable, digital communications via the telephone voice network.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    6. Re: Data logging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We all fucking know that, but in conversation it is easiest to call it 4G because that is what the carriers call it.

    7. Re:Data logging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. WCDMA (UMTS) was a more advanced version of CDMA that used a wider band and allowed to both carry on a data call and a voice call at the same time along with higher bandwidth. CDMA was a 2G standard while EV-DO was the 3G equivalent built on top of CDMA. WCDMA was the 3G built on top of GSM leveraging technology from CDMA.

      LTE uses OFDMA which is more closely related to the TDMA that GSM used than CDMA in that CDMA everyone is on all frequencies all the time and use orthogonal codes to get an individual signal to fall out of the mess where as OFDMA you are spread across multiple frequencies (similar to CDMA) but you are the sole broadcaster on those frequencies when you're on them (similar to TDMA).

    8. Re:Data logging by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I currently use NB-IOT, although it doesn't reach everywhere I need. I just bought a LoRa module to test things out recently too. A lot of interesting things are going on in that area!

    9. Re:Data logging by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Interesting

      CDMA is not dead. Current LTE is a more advanced version of CDMA and called something else because Qualcomm submitted it to a standards body.

      LTE has no relationship at all with CDMA - neither the Qualcomm standard or the air interface concept. It didn't originate from Qualcomm. Indeed Qualcomm initially worked on a rival system before throwing in the towel. LTE is the fourth generation of GSM.

      what you call GSM is the old voice only TDMA tech which was competing with CDMA for voice

      No, he said 3G GSM. Only one version of GSM, 2G GSM, uses a time division multiple access air interface. 3G used W-CDMA, a code division multiple access air interface unrelated to that used in Qualcomm's standards but similar. 4G GSM is LTE and uses an OFDMA air interface.

      It's amazing how many people out there still can't get over the fact that CDMA wasn't actually a good standard, and that Qualcomm's version in particular was awful and a dead end.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    10. Re:Data logging by mjwx · · Score: 1, Interesting

      CDMA is not dead. Current LTE is a more advanced version of CDMA and called something else because Qualcomm submitted it to a standards body.

      Nope, LTE is the "4th" (3.5th actually) generation of the GSM standard.

      WiMax was meant to be the replacement for CDMA although it wasn't developed from CDMA. WiMax has also died a well needed death.

      Verizon's CDMA was designed for voice and data was added on as a second thought. While modern versions of CDMA are designed for data and voice.

      what you call GSM is the old voice only TDMA tech which was competing with CDMA for voice

      Nope, what I call GSM are the group of technologies including GSM, UTMS, HSPA and LTE which colloquially fall under the moniker GSM.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    11. Re:Data logging by houghi · · Score: 1

      Satelite communication killed telegraphy? Don't think so. What I think that killed it was first Telex and that was killed by fax.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:Data logging by SumDog · · Score: 1

      Well, Telix killed the telegraph log before any of that.

    13. Re:Data logging by SumDog · · Score: 1

      Wi-Max was pretty fast though. I used both Sprint Wi-Max (on the HTC Evo) and Vivid Wireless (Wi-Max in Australia) .. I mean they weren't great compared to wired of course, but they were both pretty decent.

    14. Re:Data logging by msauve · · Score: 2

      GSM used TDMA, competing with Qualcomm's CDMA in some locations. Eventually, GSM (standardized by ETSI) networks changed to UMTS (standardized by 3GPP) which used CDMA modulation in recognition of its benefits. (about the same time, CDMA, the air interface, moved to CDMA2000).

      Now both are moving to LTE, which is based on OFDM modulation.

      Although it's common to colloquially include UMTS and LTE in GSM, technically, GSM is going away (if not gone already) - neither UMTS nor LTE are part of GSM, and LTE is certainly not "the '4th' (3.5th actually) generation of the GSM standard." The GP was correct in saying that GSM is TDMA tech.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    15. Re:Data logging by mccrew · · Score: 1

      Well, video killed the radio star.

      --
      Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
    16. Re:Data logging by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Verizon will resell any 3g capacity to MVNOs you might be able to use.

    17. Re:Data logging by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Minor correction: LTE is the third generation of GSM. It's the 4G version of GSM (that is: the third generation of GSM implements a fourth generation mobile phone system.)

      Interestingly the version numbers in the standards documenting first generation of GSM start at 2, for UMTS 3, and I assume for LTE they're 4, though I've never actually read the latter.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    18. Re:Data logging by williamyf · · Score: 1

      I use 2G and 3G systems for my data logging projects. They are much cheaper. Eventually I am afraid I will need to use a full 4G LTE system (at least in the US).

      You do not need to use a "full 4G LTE" system for data logging. Neither in the US, nor anywhere else. You WILL need to abandon 2G and 3G pretty much worldwide between 2020 and 2025, but do not need full 4G LTe for M2M communications (which includes data logging)

      You can use LTE-M, a simpler variant of LTE, aproved in 2013 specificaly for M2M (like data logging) communications.

      It goes easy on cost because of simpler modems and economies of scale because it is a pretty much single standard, and is very light on battery use (in line or even less than 2G, depending on Frequency Band, lower is better).

      More info here:

      https://www.radio-electronics....

      But remember, we are now in 2018, there must be 5 years of advances in LTE-M2M communications, investigate further.

      --
      *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    19. Re:Data logging by segin · · Score: 1

      "true 4G", huh? It's "true 4G" if you ignore the downlink bandwidth requirement because it was set unrealistically. A novel air interface, unprecedented latencies, unprecedented spectral efficiencies (by far)... Unless you're intent on sucking IMT-R's dick, then AT&T shut down it's True 3G IMT-SC network in 2017.

    20. Re:Data logging by segin · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile also operates a GSM/UMTS/HSPA network on a standard band (Band 2, 1900MHz PCS.)

  2. How much spectrum will this free up? by beerlord1 · · Score: 1

    How much of Verizon's spectrum is currently allocated to 3G? How much will this move free up for its 4G and future 5G networks?

    1. Re:How much spectrum will this free up? by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      About 7.

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    2. Re:How much spectrum will this free up? by segin · · Score: 1

      Roughly 15x15MHz of spectrum, depending on the local market. 5x5 1xEV-DO and 5x5 1xRTT on 850MHz (BC0) and 5x5 1xRTT on 1900MHz (BC1).

  3. Really? by demon+driver · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Funny! I have several persons in my circle of friends and acquaintances who still use 2G phones and don't want anything else. And why should they? Why should someone need to use the internet at all with their mobile phone? But then again telcos won't try to switch them off anytime soon in the country where I live, I guess.

    1. Re:Really? by kerashi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This will hit old people with flip phones the hardest. My dad uses one of these, he has one particular model he likes, and it naturally is not a 4g phone. He doesn't need a smart phone, given his tendency to leave it unplugged for days and the fact that he is so computer illiterate that he has trouble with digital gas pumps (he's bought a few car washes that he didn't want trying to get it to print a receipt). And I have an elderly friend who has an earlier version of the same phone, probably over 10 years old and still going. But I guess they aren't profitable enough to care about, compared to those on the smartphone upgrade treadmill.

    2. Re:Really? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      It is funny that people consider flip phones to be ancient. Many people don't even have a mobile phone. I am 65 and I didn't have one until I was in my 30s.

    3. Re:Really? by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      he is so computer illiterate that he has trouble with digital gas pumps (he's bought a few car washes that he didn't want trying to get it to print a receipt).

      I've nearly done this because either the screen is hard to read with the sun shining on it or the buttons are so worn it's difficult to see which the "Yes" and "No" buttons are.

    4. Re:Really? by schnell · · Score: 1

      But I guess they aren't profitable enough to care about, compared to those on the smartphone upgrade treadmill.

      The real business driver for shutting down older generation networks isn't the profitability or lack thereof of the phones and their subscribers, but instead the profitable use of that spectrum. If you have a band that is allocated to 2G and it has only a few subscribers on it, that spectrum license would be much more profitably (and efficiently) used on a newer technology with more users on it. The carrier also gains a benefit of sunsetting older networks by being able to remove gear from the tower and being able to repurpose that "real estate" for additional radios/equipment supporting high-demand newer technologies.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    5. Re:Really? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It is funny that people consider flip phones to be ancient. Many people don't even have a mobile phone. I am 65 and I didn't have one until I was in my 30s.

      My Uncle Fred doesn't have email and is proud of it.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:Really? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I'm 31 and I have a flip phone. I did have smartphones but found them too distracting.

      I know some folks who have no mobile phone at all. Or email, or computers. They have everyone beat.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    7. Re:Really? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      So I'm an idiot for keeping a phone for 8-10 years, that was given to me my previous employer. How many phone have you purchased during that time and how much did each cost? $300 each, $400 each $500 each? bet you've spent about $800-$1000 for all your new phones....

      Yea, I'll update, when I feel like it before the end of 2019.

      You could get rid of your phone, and not spend anything on them.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:Really? by williamyf · · Score: 1

      Funny! I have several persons in my circle of friends and acquaintances who still use 2G phones and don't want anything else. And why should they? Why should someone need to use the internet at all with their mobile phone? But then again telcos won't try to switch them off anytime soon in the country where I live, I guess.

      Actually, maybe in the country were you live those 2G and 3G phones will be swtiched off sooner than you think.

      I live in Venezuela, and it will happen, In india is happening already. Only africa remains a question mark about 2G 3G shutdown.

      See, spectrum is expensive, equipment shelters are overcrowded, spectrum is super-expensive, communities are reluctants to allow new anteannas (for "reassons"), and 5G needs lots and lots of small coverage antenas.

      So, a way to 5G is to eliminate the 2G and 3G equipment (freeing up electricity and space in the towers), and refarmiong the spectrum (saving money on spectrum purchases) as well as simplifiying O&M (with the corresponding cost reductions).

      there are LTE "Dumbphones" for around $80 (in india are more or less free). And those will only get cheaper as time pases.

      for example see:

      https://www.techradar.com/news... [techradar.com]

      https://smile.amazon.com/Alcat... [amazon.com]

      --
      *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    9. Re:Really? by martrootamm · · Score: 1

      Developing economies, like Venezuela, are very unlikely to shut down 2G and 3G networks even in the long term. Venezuela in particular is also unlikely to introduce 5G within the next five years.

      wrt 2G and 3G, Africa and South Asia are just as unlikely to phase these technologies out; though 5G is likely to be introduced in some markets, after 5G implementations in Northern Europe will be rated stable. 5G was launched on 27 June 2018 in Finland and Estonia.

      The situation with mobile tech adoption in India is mixed. On one hand, Reliance have switched 2G off, and their subsidiary Jio has 4G from the outset. On the other hand, Airtel have not shut their 2G network down, and I can imagine, that there may be smaller mobile providers that still offer 2G service.

      Countries with large 2G-only and 3G-only userbases are unlikely to shut these networks off anytime soon, and will opt for a gradual migration.

      Some of the reasons in favour of gradual migration:
      * Late adoption of new technologies owing to reasons economic, or geographical: 3G was never implemented until very recently; so, the entire mobile network is based on 2G (GSM), and a large amount of (if not most) people have 2G-only phones. Wealthier subscribers may have phones that support 3G, but are unable to use the technology because of non-existent infrastructure;
      * 2G and 3G have become plain utilities akin to landline phones, and can therefore be harder to phase out for their entrenched status, since:
      * many of their subscribers might not be able to afford anything else;
      * upgrading would increase the rate of planned obsolescence (lots of useless handsets); and
      * would add to large amounts of electronic waste
      -- despite being labeled a legacy technology.

      * Countries, where the 2G/3G adoption ratio per population is small (percentage-wise), can afford to upgrade faster.
      * Countries, where 2G/3G adoption is perhaps in single digits, can choose to:
      ** adopt 2G/3G either to quickly get more subscribers for less;
      ** or where there is no 2G/3G in the first place, said countries can leapfrog existing standards, and implement 4G from the outset, but with the downside, that not all people will be able to afford mobile telephony until the market is reasonably saturated, as newer technologies are also more expensive.
      * Operators in very large and very wealthy economies have both monetary and security incentives to upgrade, and most of their userbase is probably using 3G devices at the very least (think lots of iPhones with at least iPhone 3G). The United States and Australia are examples of this upgrade model.

      A historical example with the quick phaseout of 1G in favour of the 2G GSM:
      In Estonia, the 1G NMT (Nordic Mobile Telephone) network was launched in 1991, and sunset in December 2000. In a country of 1.3 million, the greatest amount of NMT subscribers at EMT (then a major operator; now Telia) was about 19,000. By early 2000, the number of subscribers was 9600. And by December 2000, there were only 351 hold-outs left, after EMT announced in May that year, that they were going to shut the NMT network down in that same month of December. NMT was then still working in Finland, Sweden, and Russia. [Source]

      Reasons for the shutdown of NMT in Estonia were the overall low and declining subscriber numbers, and the legacy status of the analogue 1G NMT network, which, compared to GSM, was not secure.

      In time, 2G/GSM has in Estonia become an entrenched technology, relied on by people who choose to have a featurephone because of its high reliability, or because they're unable to afford a smartphone (pensioners). In 2016, Telia (then Elion) turned off WAP. The status of 2G in Estonia is similar to the rest of Europe: Despite the reasonably early adoption of 3G, GSM remains widespread, is in some ways entrench

    10. Re:Really? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      The carrier also gains a benefit of sunsetting older networks by being able to remove gear from the tower and being able to repurpose that "real estate" for additional radios/equipment supporting high-demand newer technologies.

      Plus they won't have to maintain gear that may be harder to find replacement parts for.

    11. Re:Really? by Daralantan · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who used to read Slashdot daily about 10 years ago.

      Today he has a flip phone from about the same time period, and almost angrily refuses to change from it and insists he will never ever have a smart phone no matter what. States there is no reason to ever get that and why would he want that when he only wants a phone to be a phone.

      He became a grandpa fast.

    12. Re:Really? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who used to read Slashdot daily about 10 years ago.

      Today he has a flip phone from about the same time period, and almost angrily refuses to change from it and insists he will never ever have a smart phone no matter what. States there is no reason to ever get that and why would he want that when he only wants a phone to be a phone.

      He became a grandpa fast.

      I call it the Amish complex. Somewhere along the line, the old order Amish decided that 1840 was the cutoff date. After that most everything is bad. Your friend decided that flip phones were the proper end of technology.

      The thing about smartphones is that some folks think you get one, and you become a Facebook addict, or walk out in front of cars, or suddenly become a hipster. I certainly don't use mine for that. I use the phone to check my email accounts when I'm away from the house, reference technical material, and a small amount of texting. And tethering a laptop as needed.

      And I like it for that. The grandpa thing is strange and interesting. I have friends who are 20 years younger than me who are becoming grandpas, and I'm still a voracious techno-geek. There are modern things I think are dumb, but only because they are dumb for one reason or another - like Internet of Things security problems. My wife is under orders to ship me off to the Arctic for an indigenous family to put me out to freeze to death if I ever turn into an Olde Farte.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  4. "all traffic on our network is on our 4G network" by Cornwallis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bullshit.

    I was in a very touristy area of New Hampshire last week and got access to nothing BUT 3G.

  5. Re:"all traffic on our network is on our 4G networ by TFlan91 · · Score: 2

    Welcome to New Hampshire...

    You'll only get decent coverage near Manchester, Concord, Hampton (seacoast area, but not Rye or North Hampton) and Portsmouth / Dover areas...

  6. LTE coverage isn't there yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't think that by the end of 2019 the places that I go where my phone switches to CDMA are going to have LTE support. Sure it works in the cities. But driving from city to city all I can get is EVDO, sometimes 1xRTT. I doubt that Verizon will have all of those cell sites converted to LTE by the end of 2019.

    Does this mean a reduction in coverage? The only reason to go with Verizon is that it works everywhere. When I'm driving in the boonies and still need to take a work call -- that's why I pay through the nose for Verizon. And deal with having to find a CDMA capable phone (which is a serious limitation).

  7. Freq refarming for 5G and high cost of infrastruct by williamyf · · Score: 2

    Most operators around the world, specially in developed countries, are planning to shutdown 2G and 3G services. The sunsetting is expected in most of the world between 2020 and 2025

    Some operators on the loosing side of 3G (CDMA2000-EVDO and TD-SCDMA) are shooting down 3G first, and then 2G. Other operators are shooting down 2G first, keeping 3G to support Voice, in order not to pay for VoLTE Licenses. Yet others plan to keep 2G in a restricted mode for M2M Communications (think smart meters, IoT, etc.).

    This is actually a Good thing. We had 3 standards for 2G (GSM, IS-54/136 a.k.a. TDMA and IS-135 a.k.a. CDMA2000), then we had 3 3G standards (CDMA2000-EVDO, WCDMA and TD-SCDMA). Then we had two (or three, depending on how you count) standards for 4G (802.16m a.k.a. WiMax, FDD-LTE and TDD-LTE ).

    You can imagine how crowded a radio shelter is nowadays. How much electricity it consumes, how much heat it generates, and how costly the O&M contracts and logistics of all that gear is...

    And how crowded the spectrum is as well since the spectrum tends to be very expensive.

    With (hopefully) only one 5G standard, and sunseting of all 2G and 3G networks, more harmonization worldwide is possible, which leads to simpler radio modems (the end Game is TDD-LTE + 5G), and cheaper equipment. Also, spectrum that is currently used for 2G and 3G can be refarmend for 4G and 5G, leading to better service.

    this should be seen as a welcome development.

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  8. Re:"all traffic on our network is on our 4G networ by vtcodger · · Score: 1

    Cell phones work in New Hampshire? Who knew?

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  9. Re:Freq refarming for 5G and high cost of infrastr by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
    Pretty soon there will be so many phones in landfill, we will have no space to bury our dead!

    I am in the UK, and I still get 2G connections on my 4G phone in some areas. The first network here to dump 2G is going to lose a lot of subscribers because their phones will find large areas of "no signal". Also, a lot of phones switch to 2G only when the battery is low cos it uses less power. (They go back to 4G when a call is initiated).

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  10. Electronics Recycling, or Save for MVNOs? by syntap · · Score: 1

    I suppose I can now box my 3G phone hoard of "backup" phones for electronics recycling. I wonder how this will affect MVNOs, and the many 3G phones activated on those that sell service on Verizon's network? I have one on PagePlus for the few times I don't think I'll have usable T-Mobile access.

    1. Re:Electronics Recycling, or Save for MVNOs? by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      It will affect MVNOs using the Verizon network as well.

    2. Re:Electronics Recycling, or Save for MVNOs? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Just put them on eBay so people who live in places where the networks are still going can buy them... or people who want them for other projects.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. Re:"all traffic on our network is on our 4G networ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "All our traffic is 4G, because those poor 3G plebs can't get any bandwidth from the one tower per 400 sq miles we've deigned to provide them with"

  12. A welcome development? by Viol8 · · Score: 2

    "this should be seen as a welcome development."

    Why should it? I still use a 2G feature phone since it does everything I need, i can operate it without looking at the screen and while wearing gloves and the battery lasts over a week on standby. What is so welcome about me having to spend money on a phone with 4G when I don't need the functionality?

    1. Re:A welcome development? by williamyf · · Score: 1

      Why should it? I still use a 2G feature phone since it does everything I need, i can operate it without looking at the screen and while wearing gloves and the battery lasts over a week on standby. What is so welcome about me having to spend money on a phone with 4G when I don't need the functionality?

      By that same token, analog phones worked fine! Why did they sunseted the standard? Oh, the Nikel-Cadmium batteries contaminated the soil more than the lithium ion of today, and while there were less phones back then, those contaminated more and used more raw materials.

      The same could be said about IS-54/136, or CDMA2000, or TD-SCDMA... Those worked fine... Why discontinue them?

      Anyway, you do not need to buy a smartphone to enjoy the benefits of 4G, here you can have this phone for around $80. It has 4G. You can operate it without watching the screen, you can operate it using gloves, the battery lasts for 25 days on standby (or 7.5 hours of 4G talk), and you can hang up mechanicaly.

      The internet thing is a bonus, if you decide to use it in a pinch.

      https://www.techradar.com/news...

      If you do not like the Banana phone, you can have a 4G flip Phone for around $80 as well:

      https://smile.amazon.com/Alcat...

      And many others. Check around.

      --
      *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    2. Re:A welcome development? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "Oh, the Nikel-Cadmium batteries contaminated the soil more than the lithium ion of today, and while there were less phones back then, those contaminated more and used more raw materials."

      My 2G phone is smaller and used less raw materials in its manufacture than any smartphone.

      "Those worked fine... Why discontinue them?"

      I don't know, you tell me. There reaches a point where things are good enough , the only reason to keep replacing them is to make money for the companies involved, not to provide a better service to the consumer.

      "The internet thing is a bonus, if you decide to use it in a pinch."

      What a shame its not on sale where I live.

  13. You can have my Motorola Star Tac by Grand+Facade · · Score: 1

    when you pry it from my cold dead hand!

    --
    Rick B.
    1. Re:You can have my Motorola Star Tac by the_skywise · · Score: 1

      Mot-o-rola star...tac... There's a name I've not heard in a long time... a long time...
      Flip phones... where I could feel like Captain Kirk...

  14. Re:Freq refarming for 5G and high cost of infrastr by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

    Bury the dead with phones, like that, when 2G/3G dies, the dead will be able to enjoy it in the afterlife.

  15. Re:"all traffic on our network is on our 4G networ by vtcodger · · Score: 2

    "Well, in Vermont they don't work at all "

    Not so. There are several places in Vermont where if you stand in the right spot and hold your phone just so, you can sometimes get one or even two bars on your cell phone.

    Seriously, cell phone coverage in Vermont used to be pretty bad to nonexistent. But for the past decade or so, it's been much improved. Heck, in some places you can even get a signal indoors these days.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  16. Re:Ctrl+F "911" not found by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    911 calls can use any available network (hence the "emergency service only" which us t-mobile users see when we go anywhere off the highway), so they should work in areas covered by other service providers.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  17. That's not what they said. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    "For several years we've been been publicly saying that our 3G CDMA network will remain available through the end of 2019..."

    Now, as is noted in the statement above, Verizon has committed to shutting down its 3G CDMA network by the end of 2019.

    No, that's not what they said. Verizon verbally confirmed the 3G network will be available through the end of 2019. They never stated it was not going to be available after that, they simply did not commit to keeping it up. They are leaving themselves the option of shutting it down then. Nothing has been said about it being taken offline.

  18. Re:don't worry by blindseer · · Score: 1

    1G devices still work

    Where? A quick search of the internet tells me that the last 1G system was shutdown sometime around 2010.

    Oh, I get it, you said the devices still work. That's like saying your old tube TV set still works. With my old TV set I can at least use that for some retro gaming with my 8-bit Nintendo and its light gun. What are you going to do with that 1G phone? My nephew has a 1G phone, he's in diapers and likes to pretend he's making phone calls like his mom and dad.

    I'm sure someone will read this and just can't wait to pounce and point out that 2G phones can still make calls. Well, you'd better get a new phone for Christmas because a good chunk of the 2G network will be going dark in 2019 and all of it will go dark in 2020.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  19. Re:"all traffic on our network is on our 4G networ by williamyf · · Score: 1

    The problem with 4G in portsmouth is that Nyarlathotep is interfering with 4G signals so that people can not post acurate photos of him before they succumb to maddness, and their phones are destroyed.

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  20. 4G L(i)TE by tepples · · Score: 1

    In other words, "4G LTE" is really 4G Lite. I don't know when the "i" got dropped.

  21. GSM is 2G, LTE Advanced is 4G by martrootamm · · Score: 2

    I'm not disagreeing, but trying to point this out as a service to other readers:

    From the Cellular network standards navbox at Wikipedia

    E: Europe / the world;
    A: Americas, including the U.S.

    2G:
    E: GSM
    A: cdmaOne (IS-95), D-AMPS (IS-54 and IS-136)

    2G transitional (2.5G, 2.75G):
    E: GPRS, EDGE/EGPRS, Evolved EDGE (little-used / not implemented)
    A: CDMA2000 1X, CDMA2000 1X Advanced

    3G:
    E: UMTS;
    A: CDMA2000 1xEV-DO Release 0 (TIA/IS-856) (May have also been adopted in Europe, but I'll assume not in favour of plain HSPA.)

    3G transitional (3.5G, 3.75G, 3.9G):
    E: HSPA (HSDPA, HSUPA), HSPA+, LTE (plain; E-UTRA) (partial adoption in the U.S., and not on all networks)
    A: CDMA2000 1xEV-DO Revision A, EV-DO Revision B
    Other: Mobile WiMAX (802.16e), iBurst (802.20), WiBro (South Korea)

    4G:
    E: LTE Advanced (E-UTRA), LTE Advanced Pro
    A: At this point, the Americas and the United States seem to have moved to harmonise their standards with the rest of the world. I think.

    1. Re:GSM is 2G, LTE Advanced is 4G by segin · · Score: 1

      CDMA2000 1xEV-DO is used in Europe on a few networks. Norway recently had an operator switch their 450MHz network from CDMA2000 EV-DO to LTE, Ukraine has one, mostly old Soviet bloc nations have 'em left. They're dying, though.

  22. Boo! by antdude · · Score: 1

    Time for a newer smartphone by the end of 2019 since this iPhone 4S goes up to 3G (can do 1X too). :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  23. Re:Ctrl+F "911" not found by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

    911 will probably work, until the end of 2019. Much like how 911 doesn't work right now on an AMPS (analog) phone, unless it also supports a newer network (CDMA/1x/EVDO / GSM bands on world phones)

  24. Re:Ctrl+F "911" not found by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

    The phone could only make calls on technologies / bands it supports. While the phone will (hopefully) roam onto non-preferred network to make a 911 call, "emergency calls only" shows up when I'm outside of all coverage from all networks. A CDMA/1x/EVDO phone won't be able to roam and make a 911 call if there's only coverage from HSPA/LTE networks.

  25. Re:Ctrl+F "911" not found by segin · · Score: 1

    "3G GSM" or "3GSM" is actually UMTS/HSPA. It's still active on AT&T, T-Mobile, CellularOne of New Mexico, etc.