Slashdot Mirror


Logitech Is Acquiring Blue Microphones For $117 Million In Cash (theverge.com)

Logitech announced late Monday night that it is acquiring Blue Microphones for $117 million. The company known for USB condenser microphones, such as the Snowball and Yeti, will join Logitech's existing portfolio of brands. The Verge reports: Founded in 1995, Blue sells microphones that range in price from $60 to over $4,000 (for studio-grade hardware), and they're used by podcasters, musicians, and any other consumers who need higher-fidelity audio than what they get from the built-in microphones on their devices. Now, after dropping a heap of cash on the company, Logitech will do its best to make sure Blue's devices become just as essential as its own wireless keyboards and mice. "For Logitech, this is a new space," the company wrote in a blog post. "But, at the same time, it's not at all. Gamers are already using our Logitech G webcams to stream. People are video calling with friends and family thanks to Logitech every day. And in business, our audio and video know-how is apparent every time a video meeting takes place at the office. Joining up with Blue and their microphone lines is a logical adjacent opportunity with great synergies."

79 comments

  1. Re:In cash? by johnsie · · Score: 2

    Get a dictionary. Cash doesn't need to be in physical form on order to be paid to someone. cash NOUN 1Money in coins or notes, as distinct from cheques, money orders, or credit. ‘the staff were paid in cash’ ‘a discount for cash’ 1.1 Money in any form. ‘she was always short of cash’

  2. That's it, then by garryknight · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Joining up with Blue and their microphone lines is a logical adjacent opportunity with great synergies."

    So, doomed to failure, then... ;-)

    --
    Garry Knight
    1. Re:That's it, then by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They have a reputation for making priced crap, kinda like Beats headphones... Kinda like Logitech used to be, in fact.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:That's it, then by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Kinda like Logitech used to be, in fact.

      It's all crap. All input devices are made like poop, except maybe saitek joysticks. (I used to use a thrustmaster f22 pro... those are crap too. they break springs regularly FFS.)

      I'm still using a Logitech T-BB18 (IIRC, can't read the bottom sticker any more) trackball, the original "trackman usb wheel" thumb ball. I have to replace the crappy Omron microswitches every year or two, but otherwise it's still the best mousing device I've ever owned. The rest of it is great, only the microswitches (which they don't make) are junk.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:That's it, then by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I have been using the same Samsung PS2 optical mouse since about 1999. No replacement parts.

      For modern stuff Elecom do some good mice.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:That's it, then by datavirtue · · Score: 0

      Thought this was creimer....had to check the name.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    5. Re:That's it, then by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't get it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:That's it, then by quanminoan · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, such a venture could dynamically incentivize ubiquitous experiences while intrinsically maintaining resource-maximizing customer service.

  3. Probably a good buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    They are known for the Blue Yeti, one of the best value for money microphones out there for streamers. Also have other quality ones.

    1. Re:Probably a good buy by rahvin112 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Might be a good buy for Logitech but it will be an awful buy for everyone else. Just like Harmony they will destroy a vibrant company serving a niche market.

      Harmony was producing new models and innovative remote products, then Logitech bought them and all new development stopped. The Harmony division hasn't produced a product that wasn't developed premerger. Blue Yeti will experience the same, logitech will cheap out in design products, ramp them then stop all development.

      Just like harmony who was producing new products every year they will halt all new development, fire all the designers and developers and milk the product while it stagnates and dies.

    2. Re:Probably a good buy by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Same as Squeezebox. Good products, killed by Logitech. Not sure why... I am pretty happy with the other products (mice and keyboards) from Logitech, but they seem to have some trouble running more "premium" product lines.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:Probably a good buy by secondhand_Buddah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm still pissed at them because of Squeezebox. I have two perfectly good Squeezeboxes gathering dust because they chose to abandon the Squeezebox community. As the rest of the world moved on to UPNP and standardized home media streaming platforms, Logitech chose not to. I would be hesitant to buy any higher end products from them that fall into this category again.

      --
      Participatory Governance : The only feasible option for a real democracy, where everyone really does have a say.
    4. Re:Probably a good buy by Spamalope · · Score: 2

      I switched to Sennheiser headsets after my friends and I all had Logitech early failures. We had similar problems with mice and keyboards at work and stopped using them. The now quite old optical mice are all working, the newer ones didn't last a year. They're on the vendor of last resort list now.

    5. Re: Probably a good buy by TuballoyThunder · · Score: 1

      Why don't you run a squeeze server in your home? I still use my squeezebox and also a squeeze client on a raspi (with an external DAC) and it works great.

    6. Re:Probably a good buy by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      Roccat's LEADR (wireless Tyon) beats every programmable multi-button Logitech mouse I've bought since the MX-518 from 2005.

    7. Re:Probably a good buy by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      For 140 dollars, it'd better be a good mouse.

    8. Re:Probably a good buy by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      For 140 dollars, it'd better be a good mouse.

      For that money, I would expect a cat!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    9. Re:Probably a good buy by rleibman · · Score: 1

      I feel the same way, though I still run my squeeze gear, I wish it had some of the more modern stuff... I've actually started writing replacement software (backend and front end) a couple of times for fun, but the protocols are really weird, the server actually tells the client everything that has to be displayed, screen by screen.

    10. Re:Probably a good buy by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Their cheap wireless keyboard/mouse combo is the best they have. I picked up two new ones for $20 at an office supply store one day. Their pricier product lines are absolute trash. The sysadmins paid about $150 for their high-end combo (for everyone in the company) and the letters wore off in about a year for anyone doing real work. Ergonomics also sucked.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    11. Re:Probably a good buy by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I got a set of Sennheiser's PC 350 SE for like $60 a few years back. At first I thought they were overblown crap because they lacked the bass of most other headsets. After using them for a wide range of audio I have realized that everyone else is producing bass-y crap...the sound quality in these is very crisp and clear and they deliver bass when the audio track actually contains the signal.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    12. Re:Probably a good buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BLATANT SPECULATION: Presumably it's a "NIH" culture. Not invented here. So the bigwigs at Logitech can't handle a division that isn't aligned with their corporate goals or wasn't something they're personally invested in... but this division is too small to feature in their corporate goal setting and cannot ever get that personal investment as it didn't grow up in Logitech. Or the bigwigs cannot understand anything but the market they actually grew up in (which isn't any market they acquired their way into).

      Upshot, division isn't allowed to do anything new because the bosses... well, just don't do anything.

    13. Re:Probably a good buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Squeezebozes run fine still today on on Logitech Media Server Community Edition which is on version 7.9. You can also easily build a Raspberry Pi media client/server. Check of the the forum!

  4. Re:In cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    "In cash" here means that they're not paying it with stocks, like some acquisitions are done.

    captcha: currency

  5. Re:Blue Microphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They're making pretty damned good microphones e.g the Yeti is very popular among serious streamers.

    I'd suggest if anyone is interested in getting one, do it before the deal takes serious effect, Logitech isn't what it once was.

  6. Blue by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Blue is kind of like Beats: stylish, easy to use, popular, but never the top quality in its price range.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know the Yeti is popular and sounds pretty good, but charging literally twice the price to get an XLR output tells me everything I need to know about the company.

      They should fit into Logitech's portfolio quite nicely.

    2. Re:Blue by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

      Wel seeing as xlr is kind of the standard foe anything byr consumer gear (at keast when ir comes to analog) I don’r see a big problem, and you say double price, comared to what? I quess you ment comared to interfaces with 3.5 mm plugs thst produce the same sound quality

    3. Re:Blue by aitikin · · Score: 2

      Wel seeing as xlr is kind of the standard foe anything byr consumer gear (at keast when ir comes to analog) I don’r see a big problem, and you say double price, comared to what? I quess you ment comared to interfaces with 3.5 mm plugs thst produce the same sound quality

      GP is presumably referencing the Yeti (USB only) vs the Yeti Pro (USB and XLR connectivity).

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    4. Re:Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wel seeing as xlr is kind of the standard foe anything byr consumer gear (at keast when ir comes to analog)

      Clearly a Logitech keyboard. Or Yeti fingers.

    5. Re:Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wel seeing as xlr is kind of the standard foe anything byr consumer gear (at keast when ir comes to analog) I don'r see a big problem, and you say double price, comared to what? I quess you ment comared to interfaces with 3.5 mm plugs thst produce the same sound quality

      Holy fuck, please try to keep your illiteracy to yourself next time.

      You're worse than a fucking teenager on a smartphone.

    6. Re:Blue by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      but never the top quality in its price range.

      Are you implying that beats is somewhere near the top quality in its price range with that sentence? You sound like a very glass half full kind of guy who's too kind to label the frigging horrible waste of money for what it is.

    7. Re:Blue by GuB-42 · · Score: 2

      Typical market segmentation. They charge a lot of money for features that are essential to professionals but not as important for consumers.

      I don't really see a problem with that. Companies have to make money. And that way, consumers get good stuff for an affordable price and pros get the features they need for the price they are ready to pay. The alternative would be too expensive for consumers, unusable by pros, or not profitable enough for the company.

    8. Re:Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blue isn't considered stylish.... pretty sure everyone considers them what they are - a reasonably priced starting point.

    9. Re:Blue by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Well ok, I'd like to see what you consider a stylish microphone, then.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re:Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Market segmentation is having 2 lines of products,

      Adding $10 worth of components to a $100+ consumer product and doubling the price is ripping people off.

  7. RIP Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anything, Blue mics were nice because they didn't look like they came out of a 13 year old's "cool robots" art book.

    1. Re:RIP Blue by Aereus · · Score: 2

      But I like my AT2020 :(

    2. Re:RIP Blue by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

      Second for AT2020 :) I like the Blues too, but I personally like my AT2020 on a mixer board.

      --
      There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
  8. Re:Blue Microphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They're making pretty damned good microphones e.g the Yeti is very popular among serious streamers.

    Video blogging is not exactly what you need a "pretty damned good" microphone for. You want a reliable USB interface, that's all (and that basically precludes using more than one microphone at the time, anyway). The microphone capsule shouldn't suck too bad, but you don't need to worry about excellent SNR ratio or off-axis coloring or extended frequency range or transient response.

    Basically it's a small step up from budget headset quality. Which indeed puts it into Logitech ballpark.

  9. Bought the brand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    More than the customer base.

    Logitech is a consumer brand, driven by volume. Higher quality items don’t bring the same revenue, it’s N units X $P. 50 units / mo at $2000 doesn’t excite Logitech, but a few such products are a nice stable way to fund a meaningful part of the burn rate of an SME.

    10kpcs/mo of a $79 product is more like what they are interested in.

  10. corporate jargon buzzword detected! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything seemed okay/meh till the end, when:

    "synergies"

    Uh oh. This is the digital canary for: "Y'all about to get so fucked."

    The synergy is the parent takes everything, and as the acquired you give it all to them. There will be no reciprocity. Heads will roll due to "consolation" and new idiotic quarterly projections which some executive fucker promised without even consulting how much time said promise would take.

    1. Re:corporate jargon buzzword detected! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyV_UG60dD4

  11. Re: In cash? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    You must have reading comprehension in issues. That definition states that cash is coins and bills like a dime and 100 dollar bill, and NOT checks, IOUs, or contractual agreements to pay etc. So IOW all cash transactions involve cash. Who'd a thunk it!?

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  12. I work in a real recording environment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We use Blue mics. They are just tools, not saviors. We know what we are doing, that's why we are booked for the next three years. Not because of what we have, but because of what we do.

    Go back to blogging from your moms basement, son, and leave the real work to the professionals.

    1. Re:I work in a real recording environment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:I work in a real recording environment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, Blues are Tools, of consistent performance and reliability. I use the Iceballs for "Room" characterizations; set the Room up right and map it, and then fiddle with the Hifi.
      There is that odd "bump-wallow" at ~220 Hz, but most won't notice it, and fewer will care.

  13. Re:Who cares by v1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They are crap mics. Blue is the Beats of the microphone world. The only reason they got where they are is because they got their product in front of a few youtube/podcast "influencers". Go into any REAL professional recording environment and Blue is not what you will find.

    I've got a Yeti myself, and so does a friend of mine that runs his own business. He bought his after hearing how mine sounded, it can provide that rich "radio announcer" voice that people like to listen to. (in addition to the audio clarity, I also really appreciate its directivity and noise-cancelling selectable sampling patterns) He ended up re-dubbing all his existing instructional videos for his product line with the Yeit because of how much better it sounded.

    I really don't know why you'd describe them (all?) as "crap mics", without anything to back up what you say, you don't sound very convincing. Cheap webcam mics are my idea of crap because that's what they sound like. And I'm speaking with over a dozen years of radio experience under my belt.

    And no, you don't see them in hardly any big studios, because that's not what they are. They're high end consumer mics, not professional recording studio mics, at least not ones like what I got. The Yeti is one of their best values / most affordable small-studio-grade mics and is a great choice for smaller outfits like podcasters, streamers, and small businesses.

    I get the impression you've never spent any time with a Blue mic and are just kicking the brand for some hidden agenda, or just snobbing it because "that's not what my friend the PRO uses".

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  14. You need a big microphone by ruddk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Unlike TV, you need a big microphone if you are going to make a YouTube video, everybody knows that. And it should be placed directly in the middle of FOV.
    Of course that is after you have placed your musical instruments and apple products casually in the background.

    1. Re:You need a big microphone by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

      The backround, hou mean berwen the “talent” and the green screen? Ot depends on the yotuber I suppose, but mi imporesson is that streamers tend to get a gren screen quite fast, i gues they want the flexibility of adding other content (Screen caprure other video etc) and still have their fase and possibly other atributes on screen at the same time, but what do I cnow not beeing a content creator.
      Am I right in thinking thar a green screen (well lit) us the easyesr way of achiving this?

    2. Re:You need a big microphone by ruddk · · Score: 1

      I think with today’s cameras a green screen is usable way of keying it. I have just been playing a bit with it for fun and had some problems around hair and a bit of green reflecting back on the shoulders. But when it is just a small window on the stream that is not noticeable at all.
      That being said, I am not an expert at all, I just play with it because it because it is something I don’t know anything about and was curious. It is interesting what you can create with a consumer camera and a computer today. Much more accessible than in the old days with VHS home editing or even 8mm film. :) I have a few of them somewhere I made as a kid, but they have probably degraded now.

  15. they make nothing of medium quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its unfortunate that the medium market for video streaming is owned by this low end company.

  16. Complete nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Complete nonsense. You don't need a "pretty damned good" microphone, but when the majority of value you provide to your viewers is your appearance and voice, you want a "good" microphone.

    Blue happens to make "good" microphones at reasonable prices. Not whatsoever "small steps upward from budget headset".

    On the other hand, pretty much any USB interface these days is "reliable", in that it doesn't cut out mid-stream. "Reliable USB interface" is an irrelevant concern unless you are paying less than $10.

    People here sure seem clueless. Is Blue the absolute top-of-the-range recording studio quality? Far from it. But they are far above "budget".

    1. Re:Complete nonsense by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Complete nonsense. You don't need a "pretty damned good" microphone, but when the majority of value you provide to your viewers is your appearance and voice, you want a "good" microphone.

      I'm surprised at the number of streamers / Vloggers / Youtube channels where they have a ridiculously expensive microphone, yet still get lots of really distracting popping because they are basically eating the microphone. I've had better results using dollar store microphones for naration.

      It's actually funny how many people have really expensive gear, but no clue how to use it, or not even very good content.

  17. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, you will not usually find Blue microphones in a "REAL professional recording environment".

    Because in a REAL professional recording environment, a single channel runs $1-2k+ for the microphone, $1-2k for the preamp, $1-2k for the equalizer, $1-2k for the compressor, $1-2k+ for the AD converter.

    No sh*t a $100 microphone isn't there. It's still good enough for a good-quality podcast, which a $10 stick isn't.

  18. Re:Blue Microphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're getting it wrong.

    They are making pretty damned good microphones for what they are. I'm sure they are not suited for recording everything, but I'm pretty sure if you want something better it will cost you a substantial amount more.

    I'm also pretty sure Logitech doesn't sell anything which reaches that standard, as they have turned into peddlers of diverse cheap crap rather than actually making quality products.

  19. Quality trend by gazelam · · Score: 1

    Blue has been making very decent studio-quality mics for over 20 years. No, they are not up there with Neumann, but the large-diaphragm condensers have a very acceptable sound and that's a good alternative to other studio mics for those who want that sound. I like AKG in that price range and have always liked Shure and Audio Technica in the lower price ranges. I have not used their USB mics and don't have a need. For those who really like the studio mics, this could end up being like CBS purchasing Fender in 1965. It will take a while, but commoditization will drive out the things that made the products what they are.

    1. Re:Quality trend by MrDiablerie · · Score: 1

      Blue has been making very decent studio-quality mics for over 20 years. No, they are not up there with Neumann, but the large-diaphragm condensers have a very acceptable sound and that's a good alternative to other studio mics for those who want that sound. I like AKG in that price range and have always liked Shure and Audio Technica in the lower price ranges. I have not used their USB mics and don't have a need. For those who really like the studio mics, this could end up being like CBS purchasing Fender in 1965. It will take a while, but commoditization will drive out the things that made the products what they are.

      I can second this. Their non-podcasting, studio grade mics have a good reputation within the recording community.

  20. Re:Who cares by nickjj · · Score: 1

    I used to use a Blue Yeti for screencasting but got rid of it. They tend to perform horribly in untreated rooms because they pick up everything.

    You can usually get a much better result with a dynamic mic for any type of recording where you're not moving around and it's just you talking. Not only will you reduce background noise, but you'll also get a great tone. A $70 AT2005 dynamic mic (which has both USB and XLR connections) outperformed the standard Blue Yeti in my case by a huge amount.

  21. Re:In cash? by slashdice · · Score: 0

    They should use bitcoin. It uses a block chain. Much stronger than wrapping your cash in rubber bands (which can break).

    --
    Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
  22. Did you set the pickup pattern? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it picked up everything, you probably had it in omni. Rookie mistake.

  23. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are crap mics. Blue is the Beats of the microphone world. The only reason they got where they are is because they got their product in front of a few youtube/podcast "influencers". Go into any REAL professional recording environment and Blue is not what you will find.

    I've got a Yeti myself, and so does a friend of mine that runs his own business. He bought his after hearing how mine sounded, it can provide that rich "radio announcer" voice that people like to listen to. (in addition to the audio clarity, I also really appreciate its directivity and noise-cancelling selectable sampling patterns) He ended up re-dubbing all his existing instructional videos for his product line with the Yeit because of how much better it sounded.

    How much better than what? A built-in cam mic? I doubt that his original takes were using something as "sophisticated" as, say, Samson C02 (pretty cheap budget mics with somewhat more consistent quality than Behringer), let alone reasonable mics (somewhat in rising price order) from ATG, beyerdynamics, Oktava or Røde. Which still aren't in the "professional" ballpark of brands like Schoeps or Neumann. The professional mic brands do not offer something like a built-in USB interface which blocks multi-channel setups and severely limits the lifetime of the product (a good microphone will easily last you 30 years or more while something like USB tends to die from the hardware equivalent of bitrot within a decade).

  24. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the world of professional recording microphones. It's a large diaphragm condenser. Those pick up everything by design. There's a reason why real recording studios have isolation booths for recording vocals.

  25. Great, now how about bringing back the Marble FX? by kimgkimg · · Score: 1

    Got a bunch of rabid fans that want the Marble FX Trackball brought back Logitech! Please bring it back newer and better (well just add USB connectivity, it was pretty much perfect the way it was): https://www.facebook.com/Bring...

  26. Logitech MX 518 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they'll do what they did with the Logitech MX 518... figure out which microphone everyone loves the most and then quit making it.

  27. Re:In cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not the same usage case. This case is more akin to your first example. It means they are giving the current owners money as opposed to doing a stock trade.

  28. Re:In cash? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    whoooosh!!

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  29. Re:Blue Microphones by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    I was surprised at the amount being so low. The company I worked for was acquired for $147MM+. We didn't make anything...just a slight fintech marketing shop.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  30. Re:Who cares by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    Bought a samson directional mic years ago with a USB interface. Perfect for pod casts and videos.

    [Disclaimer: I am not Creimer.]

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  31. deja vu by DogYears · · Score: 1

    Jake: You traded the Bluesmobile for this?

    Elwood: No, for a microphone.

    Jake: A microphone? Okay, I can see that.