Slashdot Mirror


In America's Big Tech Cities, More People Are Now Living In Their Vehicles (cbsnews.com)

An anonymous reader quotes CBS MoneyWatch: The number of people residing in campers and other vehicles surged 46 percent over the past year, a recent homeless census in Seattle's King County, Washington found. The problem is "exploding" in cities with expensive housing markets, including Los Angeles, Portland and San Francisco, according to Governing magazine. The problem of vehicle residency is national in scope, although its impact may be more "acutely felt in urban areas where space is more limited," said Sara Rankin, an assistant professor law at Seattle University and the director of Homeless Rights Advocacy Project, in an email to CBS MoneyWatch.
"Amazon, Microsoft and other big tech companies are in the Seattle area," notes Zero Hedge, adding "It is a region that is supposedly 'prospering', and yet this is going on."

Back in Silicon Valley, one Google employee slept in a truck in Google's parking lot for two years -- allowing him to save at least $48,000 that he would've paid in rent -- though many vehicle-dwellers apparently have non-technical jobs as plumbers, janitors, and even teachers. "A fair number of the 'vehicular homeless' in Silicon Valley are employed but are unable to find affordable housing," reports CBS, citing an AP article last November about "Silicon Valley's car people".

"Lines of RVs can be found near the headquarters of tech heavyweights such as Apple, Google and Hewlett-Packard."

7 of 281 comments (clear)

  1. "Monopoly" Is A Model Of Capitalism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... and we all know how that games ends.

    >> "Amazon, Microsoft and other big tech companies are in the Seattle area," notes Zero Hedge, adding "It is a region that is supposedly 'prospering', and yet this is going on."
    > As the gap between the rich and the poor continues to increase, the middle class is steadily eroding.

    7 years ago, when those smelly Occupy Wall Street hippies were protesting rampant income inequality, they were derided by conservatives and libertarians. The right-wing party line was something like "Any amount of inequality is just and tolerable, as long it was achieved through pure capitalist means".

  2. So much for Remote Work by locater16 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Back in the late 60's Arthur C. Clark predicted networked computers would make remote work possible for everyone.

    Ironically, the people least allowed to work remotely appear to be those that allow increasing amount of people in other industries to do exactly that. Sure, that website's employees can all be remote and there can be no actual HQ to even speak of, but hell forbid that anyone working for Evil Tech Inc. work anywhere but at HQ where they can be properly monitored and recorded!

  3. subsidized housing ? by Archfeld · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If the companies would put up buildings and subsidize their own workers and then provide shuttle service it could attract qualified workers into very high cost of living areas, while not contributing as much to the local traffic. One problem I did not see mentioned but I've encountered in downtown apartment/condos is parking. I would love to see a building that had apartments, a supermarket, restaurants, a medical facility and maybe a day care/school all combined. No doubt the corps would turn this kind of company district into a for profit trap, but the idea seems solid up front.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re: subsidized housing ? by c6gunner · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's got an even older name; a company town.

      They got a bad rep for a number of reasons, like the fact that they gave the company way too much control over workers lives. Companies could set arbitrary prices on goods, charging whatever they wanted. Plus if you got fired you not only lost your job, you also got booted out of your house.

      Also if the company went tits up so did the town, which kinda sucked.

      Turns out they weren't that great of an idea after all.

    2. Re: subsidized housing ? by Ichijo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a good description of the H-1B program also. If you lose your job, you get booted out of the country. How's that for modern day slavery?

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  4. Dumb fucks by argStyopa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ....here's a tip: MOVE.

    The entire midsection of the country is facing unemployment levels the lowest they've been in 20 years. Real wages are going up, and the cost of living is HALF (or less) than it is on the coasts.

    Find out what REAL "quality of life" means when it's not measured in Starbucks per square mile. Where you can actually see the stars?

    https://www.washingtonpost.com...

    Actually, better: no. Please DON'T move to the midsection of the country. It's terrible here. Much better to live in your car.

    --
    -Styopa
  5. I can at least speak for California by Sydin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It all comes down to one problem: Proposition 13.

    In a nutshell, Prop 13 artificially lowers property tax to an insane degree, and keeps it artificially low until that property changes hands via sale. What this means in practice is that if you own property in California, you don't want to sell it because until you do it is taxed at a way lower rate than it should be. This means lots of people hold on to their property, which raises the value of property overall. In turn, those who hold on to their property now find their property values skyrocketing because demand is nowhere near supply, and all of their personal wealth gets tied up in said property value. So for them to keep that wealth, the best thing is for as little property as possible to enter the market, to keep their values high. Hence, the NIMBYism you see rampant across California, particularly in SF, LA, SJ, etc.

    Barring Prop 13's repeal or a complete collapse of the California economy triggering a wave of panic sellers, property value will continue to inflate as more people and businesses want to operate here but less and less people are willing to sell.