Slashdot Mirror


BBC Wants Microsoft To Expose 'Doctor Who' Leaker (torrentfreak.com)

Last month, the BBC headed to court to track down the person who leaked an incomplete scene featuring Jodie Whittaker's Thirteenth Doctor. New court documents suggest that the British broadcaster has yet to find the perpetrator, and is hoping Microsoft can help. At a federal court in Washington, the BBC requested a DMCA subpoena targeted at a OneDriver user who shared the infringing material online late June. TorrentFreak reports: In an effort to track down the source of the leak the BBC has taken the matter to the U.S. courts. Last month it obtained a DMCA subpoena from a California federal court, ordering the forum tool Tapatalk to identify the source of an infringing post. Whether this resulted in any useful information is unknown, but a few days ago it became clear that BBC is still investigating the matter. In a separate effort, BBC Studios have filed a request for a DMCA subpoena at a Federal court in Washington. This time it's directed at Microsoft. According to the BBC, a user of Microsoft's OneDrive stored and shared a copy of the leaked file, titled "IMG_ l563.TRIM.MOV."

"The infringing material includes, without limitation, an unauthorized copy of copyrighted video content from Season 11, Episode 1 of Doctor Who, for which BBC Worldwide Limited t/a BBC Studios (Distribution) is the exclusive licensee," the BBC writes. According to the BBC, the footage in question was stolen from the studio. Through the subpoena, the company hopes to find out more about the source of this leak, to prevent similar situations going forward. It asks Microsoft to hand over any relevant information that can help to identify the account holder who uploaded the video, which was added to OneDrive back in June. This includes "any name, account name, address, telephone number, email address, birth date, profile photo, device information, browser information, location information, information from others (e.g., Facebook or Google+) and time posted."

8 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. Can I really hate Bill Clinton now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bill Clinton gave us both Hillary and the DMCA.

    Ouch.

    1. Re: Can I really hate Bill Clinton now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      You've been allowed to hate Bill Clinton for decades now, your thoughts, such as they are, are free.

      Wouldn't have been any different under Dukaksis or Tsongas though*, the law was passed by bipartisan margins in the House and with unanimous consent in the Senate, and it hasn't been significantly changed in any way since despite decades of opportunity.

      The corporations got what they wanted from WIPO. They had enough politicians in their pocket across the world that blaming Bill Clinton is like blaming Mrs. O'Leary's cow.

      (*maybe Perot, but who knows what that nut job would have done? It isn't like he wouldn't kowtow to his corporate masters himself.)

  2. Re:WTF? by Faluzeer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Is this the level of comments nowadays?

    These days? It has been like for quite some time, certainly over a decade. This actually looks better than normal, so far there is very little spam.

  3. Re:BBC can suck a BBC by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Perhaps you are just old.

    When you are young the tropes and ideas whatever they are are new and novel to you. So they are interesting new ideas no matter how old they are. Then as you get older they become the same old thing over and over again.

    The TV Shows/Movies/Music when you were the ages of 8-18 just isn't as good anymore with a noticeable decline seeming to happen at ages 20-25
    By the time you reach your 50's and 60's such media is considered threatening to your way of life.

    Before the age of 8 or so, your understanding on what is happening in media and arts is rather limited.
    By the age of 8 or so your brain has developed to a point where you can understand abstract concepts and realize the meaning behind the art form. During the next decade you can absorb and comprehend such stories and topic, Until early adulthood. After that these things are becoming repetitive and tiresome.
    Your viewing of such media declines because it reward is lessen, and other responsibility take president. Then as you get near retirement age, your responsibilities decline, and then are exposed to such media again nearly a half a century later you find that the same-old actually had changed and is promoting a life style and culture that you are not comfortable with and take it as a threatening message.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  4. Re:Good luck with that by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why do you automatically assume that a female doctor added to the show was there to be politically correct?
    I mean we had only two words from her official debut. In terms of narrative purposes We already had 12 (or is it 13) Changes in actors that bring a different take to the character the Doctor.
    Grumpy, Hobo, Super Spy, Bohemian, Jock, Egotist, Strategist, ..., Warrior, Resentful, Vengeful, Goofball, and Unsure.

    Lately narrative can write Female Hero's who are not so stereotypical and more general human. Where the gender is who they are, but not what guides the stories.

    Even a decade ago, it would had been politically correct to make a female doctor. But I doubt they would had been able to write a good one, with companions such as Rose and Martha showing the pitfalls in popular narrative of the time. However I think they are getting much better now, and can keep a compelling narrative with a female doctor now.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  5. Re:Good luck with that by Slyfox696 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If it were not done for political reasons, why do it now? Why wasn't it done between 2005 and 2012?

    Why not do it now? Why is 2005-2012 somehow better than now? There is nothing in Dr. Who lore which says a Time Lord male cannot regenerate into a female (in fact, quite the opposite given The Master/Missy). So...aside from her being a woman, exactly what problem do you have with this?

    Did you miss the cultural shift where the public widely reject the "progressive" ideology of the elite?

    Casting actresses in a show is a "progressive ideology of the elite"? Perhaps in the 1700s, but it hasn't been for quite some time. You should look into making the leap into the 20th century. Being only 100 years behind the rest of us seems as if it would be an improvement for you.

  6. Re:British TV by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Informative

    Am I the only one wondering why a British TV series was having production work done in the US?

    A lot of American film has work done in British studios. A lot of British film has work done in American studios. The industry has been internationalized for decades. Americans have been using Pinewood studios since the early days of TV and the British have been taking advantage of expertise in Hollywood- if you pay attention to closing credits; lots of Hollywood blockbusters have European centres involved. It's nothing new.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  7. Re:Good luck with that by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They were trying to revamp the show because it was getting stale. The standard method for doing that is to change showrunner and writing team (check) and introduce some new elements (check).

    What's strange is why it's such a big deal to people. The Doctor is an alien, largely sexless and uninterested in relationships... The biggest change will be how other people react to her, rather than anything she does I think.

    It's not even a new idea, we had all this decades ago in Star Trek with Trill characters. And they often did focus on their relationships. Maybe it's because the internet was less of a thing back then, but I don't remember the backlash against it at the time. It was just an interesting idea to be explored. The spin off idea is probably a non-starter just because the BBC doesn't have the money and the main series is in need to saving anyway.

    Perhaps you can explain, what is lost or lessened by having a female doctor?

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC