Slashdot Mirror


Google Boots Open Source Anti-Censorship Tool From Chrome Store (torrentfreak.com)

Google has removed the open-source Ahoy! extension from the Chrome store with little explanation. The tool facilitated access to more than 1,700 blocked sites in Portugal by routing traffic through its own proxies. TorrentFreak reports: After servicing 100,000 users last December, Ahoy! grew to almost 185,000 users this year. However, progress and indeed the project itself is now under threat after arbitrary action by Google. "Google decided to remove us from Chrome's Web Store without any justification," team member Henrique Mouta informs TF. "We always make sure our code is high quality, secure and 100% free (as in beer and as in freedom). All the source code is open source. And we're pretty sure we never broke any of the Google's marketplace rules."

Henrique says he's tried to reach out to Google but finding someone to help has proven impossible. Even re-submitting Ahoy! to Google from scratch hasn't helped the situation. "I tried and resubmitted the plugin but it was refused after a few hours and without any justification," Henrique says. "Google never reached us or notified us about the removal from Chrome Web Store. We never got a single email justifying what happened, why have we been removed from the store, or/and what are we breaching and how can we fix it." TorrentFreak reached out to Google asking why this anti-censorship tool has been removed from its Chrome store. Despite multiple requests, the search giant failed to respond to us or the Ahoy! team.
Thankfully, the Ahoy! extension is still available on Firefox.

46 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. What happened to "Don't be evil" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They've gone to full-on evil

    1. Re:What happened to "Don't be evil" by misnohmer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, they just redefined what "evil" is to "anything against Google's corporate goals".

    2. Re:What happened to "Don't be evil" by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

      Ehhh they are going to switch over to the other great corporate lie

      Google the company that cares more about people than profits.

    3. Re:What happened to "Don't be evil" by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Anything against the cult is evil. Anything inside the cult is holy.

    4. Re:What happened to "Don't be evil" by Desler · · Score: 1

      What happened to "Don't be evil"

      That was never a legal-binding motto. Still funny how many people fell for that nonsense.

    5. Re:What happened to "Don't be evil" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It does seem odd because there are lots of other VPN/proxy extensions available for Chrome, so there must be some reason why they removed this one.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:What happened to "Don't be evil" by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3

      No, they really did drop their own rule to not be evil.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re:What happened to "Don't be evil" by umghhh · · Score: 1

      Now imagine some algorithm that enthusiasts call AI already being part of some unjustified lay off action or disabling some users from their financial SW etc - how do you appeal to a company that does not have anybody at help desk because algorithms do it all right and there is no programmed way to repeal the decisions made?

    8. Re:What happened to "Don't be evil" by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      As best I can tell, Google rejected this privacy enhancing application to cooperate with the Chinese government, and to help protect the gathering of client data by online businesses. Other governments also object to privacy applications, but China is the largest growing market. Google has to compete with companies like Baidu who are far more cooperative with the Chinese government to grow in Asia, especially in China.

    9. Re:What happened to "Don't be evil" by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      Google have too much attack surface for governments to target and they don't want to lose another market like they lost China. True evilness is banning YouTube downloader plugins. Anywho, Google is now too big to support the open web or a truly free browser. And Firefox Quantum doesn't look bad at all...

    10. Re: What happened to "Don't be evil" by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's about China per se. Big Brother Google just really loves censorship.

    11. Re: What happened to "Don't be evil" by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      If I may disagree, Google has very little commercial reason to love censorship. Their business is based on a very wide ranging consumption of eveyr type of data possible, so that Google can monitor _that_ and assemble the most desired information to provide people. Their popular services are based on being able to handle any question for anyone at all. They're been forced to put some limits on that information, by copyright and security laws, but they seem compelled to do this, not _eager_ to do this.

      Google has shown that they're willing to make compromises with repressive governments: In China, they compete with Baidu, which is far more cooperative with censorship. But what strikes at Google's business models is the _anonymization_ of requests. Their targeted advertising and targeted searching is some of the most effective in the world. An anti-censorship tools that anonymizes and conceals the _requests_ for data, and the data harvested by and lingered over by clients, could interfere profoundly with Google's main businesses.

  2. i want to download it and use it for a test by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    i dont want to use it to download any illegal material, i use chromium on Linux, and i want to know if google can access my browser extensions without my explicit permission because if google deletes it, then watching something disappear from my browser extension list will prove google accesses my browser without my explicit permission

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:i want to download it and use it for a test by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      okay, got it installed, text is in Spanish or Portuguese, just change the file extension to zip, unzip in a separate folder just for ahoy, then open chrome/chromium extensions page enable developer mode and load unpacked and select where you unpacked ahoy, now we will see if the goog deletes it

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    2. Re:i want to download it and use it for a test by FudRucker · · Score: 3, Informative

      it gets deleted when i close the browser and reopen it

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    3. Re:i want to download it and use it for a test by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

      Chrome auto-disables extensions that don't come from the chrome store, and Opera does the same. It's not developer friendly, because you need to track down that special build of Chrome that believes you know what you're doing and allows you to develop extensions without interference.

      Vivaldi still accepts unpacked extensions.

  3. Google is pro censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Google conspired with Apple and Facebook to silence Alex Jones. Google is pushing https everywhere to eliminate anonymous publishing. Why are you surprised.

    1. Re:Google is pro censorship by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Don't be evil" was the young Google. Their new motto is "power corrupts".

    2. Re:Google is pro censorship by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Google is pushing https everywhere to eliminate anonymous publishing.

      What are you talking about?

      HTTPS everywhere stops ISPs and governments from casually snooping on everything I do online. And it doesn't prevent anonymous publishing.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:Google is pro censorship by ConfusedVorlon · · Score: 1

      how does pushing https everywhere eliminate anonymous publishing? If you can publish on http, then with minimal extra work you can publish on the same domain with https using lets encrypt. No additional identification is needed.

  4. Gotta toe the line for China by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can't have the Chinese government thinking Google supports routing around censorship, now can we?

    1. Re: Gotta toe the line for China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That is a good point. Anyone else remember when people said that the internet sees censorship as damage and routes around it? Well, for-profit corporations see routing around censorship as causing damage to their bottom line, and are routing around THAT.

      Google is fully in thrall to their corporate masters. I say we kill it.

      Step 1: stop using google as a verb.

      Step 2: stop using google at all. That means finding and using alternatives (that do not themselves use google,) for any and all services google provides that you use. All of them.

      (If you are unwilling or unable to do these things at least, you are complicit, and shut the fuck up and quit crying about the evil people whose machinachions you are aiding and abetting by letting them make money off you, and quit whining about whatever the do to you.)

      Step 3: when people tell you to just google something, give them a dirty look, ask them what the fuck they are talking about, and when they explain, lecture them for 10 minutes about how they are helping google perpetuate evil and censorship around the world and how they are complicit in googles evils. Do this EVERY TIME until people stop using google, either as a verb, or as a search engine.

      Step 4: be vigilant. Look out for google to change its name and pop back up with some other bullshit name, and also watch out for whatever group you do business with suddenly taking Do not act like dicks out of their corporate charter, because nothing is as corrupting as money. The price of not funding and fueling such hypocrisy is eternal vigilance against your google-replacement growing up and turning into fucking google.

    2. Re: Gotta toe the line for China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, use DuckDuckGo in Opera through AVG VPN. And don't live in a totalitarian state. I guess that means don't live on Planet Earth.

    3. Re:Gotta toe the line for China by jodido · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is not so different from "leftists" who want to prevent anyone they don't like from speaking.

  5. Re:Likely to appease a foreign authoritarian regim by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    They need to grow to new markets in order to keep revenue up and the stock up. Greed.

  6. Re:A plugin that hijacks web traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Opera turbo mode, VPNs and Tor could all effectively be said to do the same thing. What's not legit about it? Are you saying we should never try to route around censorship?

  7. Play Stores, App Stores by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is why these things were an awful idea. We knew this would happen, platforms kicking off people for.. no reason at all.

    Boycott this garbage, App Store, Play Store, Microsoft Store, it's all bullshit. Don't support it, don't publish to it, don't buy from it. The only thing these corporate entities understand is profit/loss. So seriously, vote with your wallet, don't buy anything from any of these sites.

    Only a united front vs. these abominations will yield results. We all have to take a stand and say 'no.' Even you folks publishing and making money, stop, for the greater good. Go back to the old school software distribution, do it yourself. Building a website to host your app is cheap and easy, there's no excuse. If you can develop an app, you're definitely smart enough to set up a cloud based server.

    1. Re: Play Stores, App Stores by seretonin.flatline · · Score: 1

      I love this thinking.

    2. Re:Play Stores, App Stores by Kohath · · Score: 1

      A billion people should get viruses on their phones because 1 app gets booted from 1 online store?

    3. Re:Play Stores, App Stores by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      I boycotted this stuff for years. But then Blackberry failed because...wait for it...there weren't enough apps.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    4. Re:Play Stores, App Stores by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

      Much of the services that allow for the internet to function are privately owned and are *not* common carriers.

      I'm not sure why I'm bothering, but here goes!

      It's true, all of the internet is pretty much in private hands. But if you're trying to convince me that a site like Daily Stormer can't find a single bent provider to host their pages.. it's not going to happen, not when there's still hosting for Westboro Baptist Church, don't they run the 'godhatefags.com' site, or something similar? If that trash can find hosting, Daily Stormer just isn't trying hard enough. Not buying it.

  8. Re:Likely to appease a foreign authoritarian regim by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lately Google has been actively courting regimes who are heavy on censorship.

    "Foreign authoritarian regimes"?

    Maybe, at least partially.

    Have you heard what the US FBI, for instance, has been saying lately about things like the widespread use of strong encryption? I don't think it would be a stretch to assume US TLAs would frown upon this type of anonymizing tool for the same sort of reasons they currently object to the widespread use of strong encryption.

    When you start talking about authoritarian regimes, don't leave out the US government which is one of the largest and most intrusive.

    Big Brother insists you not obstruct your Telescreen, Comrade!

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  9. Re:No shit, Sherlock by JMJimmy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everyone wanted a walled garden cause it was "easier"

    This was entirely predictable and dismissed by those who said things like this would never happen.

  10. Altername search engine? by Jerry · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bing?
    Run by Microsoft, which is just as evil and anti-free speech as Google

    Baidu?
    The definition of censorship -- might as well use Google.

    Yandex?
    If you like your search results slanted to Russia's ideology. Like Baidu, it is alright for the comrades but not for lovers of freedom.

    Ecosia?
    Powered by Bing, claims to be CO2 neutral, but Bing is powered by oil so not really CO2 neutral.

    DuckDuckGo or StartPage?
    For those not wanting to run Bing or Google these two are everyone's favorite. However, they are merely front ends for Google, but they do not let your queries become linked to your IP address or personal info.

    Twitter?
    Surely you jest. The master of double standards and censorship. Besides, like FB, they are dying because people are getting tired of their heavy handed and biased ways.

    CCSearch?
    Just another layer of snooping and 3rd party sales of your info. Logs on your searches kept for a period of time. Just use Google if you don't mind being spied upon.

    Wiki.com?
    A search engine which searches only Wiki's. Wikis themselves are heavily slanted and filtered to fit a certain political slant. Again, comrades should have no problem using them.

    Boardreader?
    If you’re searching for content written by everyday users about a topic this is your tool. Will the "everyday user" know what they are talking about? Too many seem to think that perpetual energy devices are real, and that Planet Nibiru is about to strike. :(

    Slideshare?
    Sponsored by LinkedIn, a comrade to Google, Twitter, Facebook and Microsoft, it links to videos, slides, pdf's and other educational material. Many are dated. Not the site to use if you want up to date information without a slant.

    So, what to use?
    What ever you want. Just know what using your choice can cost you more than you may realize.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    1. Re:Altername search engine? by barbariccow · · Score: 4, Informative

      duckduckgo is not a front-end for google... the search results are completely different. I mean for fucks sake their page lists the ips and user agent that their web crawler uses here: https://duckduckgo.com/duckduc...

    2. Re:Altername search engine? by jimbo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Indeed, for traditional search results they source from Bing; https://duck.co/help/results/sources

    3. Re:Altername search engine? by Sesostris+III · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what https://duck.co/ is, but I am quite sure it's not the same as https://duckduckgo.com/

      --
      You never know what is enough unless you know what is more than enough. - Blake
    4. Re:Altername search engine? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Duckduckgo stopped being a front end for Google a long time ago. They actually federate searches from several search engines as well as their own sources to produce results. Not that that is really relevant. Most people don't complain about the quality of Google's search results, just all the other practices of the company.

    5. Re: Altername search engine? by jay+age · · Score: 1

      Qwant.

  11. Why chrome? by barbariccow · · Score: 2

    Why does anyone use chrome and voluntarily give their shit to google anyway? Just build a PGO version of firefox. It's fast as shit, and not stupid.

  12. Re:A plugin that hijacks web traffic by higuita · · Score: 2

    its open source, you can check what it does
    from what i read, it will detect the block page, redirects the request to one proxy and send to their servers the url of the blocked page (to detect new blocked domains)

    A more simple alternative is just use google, cloudflare or other external DNS, as this block is done in the dns

    --
    Higuita
  13. Preaching to the choir by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Didn't work for Facebook; won't work for Google.

    Both companies have been doing wrong, and lots of of it, for a long time. There's absolutely no sign that the general run of users of either one care even a little bit.

    A few people shouting here on /. mean nothing.

    All of which I am very sorry to observe, but there it is.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  14. for those not paying attention: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Big Tech has gone all-in on fascism (NOT Trumpism which many hate but is NOT fascism, but ACTUAL fascism where government and corporations unite hand-in-glove to oppress). Big Tech is enabling all the oppression demanded by each national or local government. China wants the keys to Apple servers and - shazam! - China gets them. China wants to censor speech and - zap! - Google is all on-board. Democrat lawmakers demand the suppression of a tawdry guy like Alex Jones, who for some reason they seem to think harms them (I certainly do not see how the guy is anything but bad comedy or "performance art"), and - abra cadabra! - all the social media sites knock him off within a 12 hour timeframe. Multiple governments despise tools people use for privacy or to evade censorship and Google is only too eager to oblige in eliminating the tools.

    Big Tech had a choice: Either be facilitators of true uncensored speech and let the speakers be accountable for their own words, or become censors and in doing so become enablers of oppression. They seem to be choosing the latter.

    Fascism has many benefits for corporate meat puppets - as long as they do the bidding of their masters, they are allowed all the benefits of being in control of their particular fiefdoms and as a bonus their masters will use the power of government to suppress/oppress any would-be competitors. When faced with the decision to either go fascist or remain a beacon of freedom, most corporate executives in history have made the easy, obvious, "no-brainer" choice: they goose stepped into line with fascism.

    Free people of all stripes need to face a simple truth: Big Tech is not your friend. You might love your iPhone, but it's just a handy tool and the big company operating it is not your pal. You might like Facebook and Google, but they do not like you.... they are spying on you, selling you out, censoring what you see, and helping others manipulate you. Do at least half your web searches using a Google competitor. Try using other social media sites than Facebook or Twitter at least half the time. Stop feeding the beasts.

  15. Another justification for the EU fine by Bruce66423 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let's hope the EU keeps extracting money from Google till they get the message.

  16. Re:A plugin that hijacks web traffic by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    So what next AC?
    No blocking approved ads?
    No blocking ads?
    No blocking approved ad services and sites?
    The user will soon have no control over their own browser on their own computer.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  17. Same old Corporate Outlook by nagora · · Score: 1

    In the 1930's, the US was the only nation to increase investment in Nazi Germany because it was a strong government of "people we can work with".

    In the 2010's, Google sees Fascist China as "people we can work with" too, and so do many others. This time, the wilful blindness to the consequences is not restricted to the US, however.

    So, yeah, can't allow anyone to get around censorship - someone's got to think about the money, you know.

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"