Slashdot Mirror


Mathematicians Solve Age-Old Spaghetti Mystery (sciencedaily.com)

If you happen to have a box of spaghetti in your pantry, try this experiment: Pull out a single spaghetti stick and hold it at both ends. Now bend it until it breaks. How many fragments did you make? If the answer is three or more, pull out another stick and try again. Can you break the noodle in two? If not, you're in very good company. From a report: The spaghetti challenge has flummoxed even the likes of famed physicist Richard Feynman '39, who once spent a good portion of an evening breaking pasta and looking for a theoretical explanation for why the sticks refused to snap in two. Feynman's kitchen experiment remained unresolved until 2005, when physicists from France pieced together a theory to describe the forces at work when spaghetti -- and any long, thin rod -- is bent. They found that when a stick is bent evenly from both ends, it will break near the center, where it is most curved. This initial break triggers a "snap-back" effect and a bending wave, or vibration, that further fractures the stick. Their theory, which won the 2006 Ig Nobel Prize, seemed to solve Feynman's puzzle. But a question remained: Could spaghetti ever be coerced to break in two?

The answer, according to a new MIT study, is yes -- with a twist. In a paper published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers report that they have found a way to break spaghetti in two, by both bending and twisting the dry noodles. They carried out experiments with hundreds of spaghetti sticks, bending and twisting them with an apparatus they built specifically for the task. The team found that if a stick is twisted past a certain critical degree, then slowly bent in half, it will, against all odds, break in two. The researchers say the results may have applications beyond culinary curiosities, such as enhancing the understanding of crack formation and how to control fractures in other rod-like materials such as multifiber structures, engineered nanotubes, or even microtubules in cells.

73 comments

  1. Wrong paper by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Informative

    The link doesn't even go to the right journal - it goes to a paper in Nature when it says it is a PNAS paper - and the paper doesn't have anything to do with bending any kind of rod. The correct paper is Controlling fracture cascades through twisting and quenching.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Wrong paper by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      Editor appears to have fixed the link.

    2. Re:Wrong paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the real news. We should submit that as an article here!

    3. Re:Wrong paper by LifesABeach · · Score: 2

      Lets take an assessment of things. Not Done: Anti-Gravity Generators, Personal Robot Power Supplies, Tourist Vacations on the Moon. Tasking Completed: Bending, then Breaking Spaghetti. Got it; everybody, get back to work.

  2. Frosti pasto by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    Did they try doing it underwater, or burying it in sand? That might damp the wave.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Frosti pasto by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried to break a stick of pasta under water? It gets a bit floppy.

    2. Re: Frosti pasto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if let it boil for 10 minutes or otherwise soak for hours beforehand

    3. Re:Frosti pasto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what she said.

    4. Re:Frosti pasto by kiviQr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ig Nobel Prize is in order for reasearch on breaking cooked/wet spaggetti in two pieces.

    5. Re:Frosti pasto by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      This one sounds like an Iggy Prize to be proud of; just for the amusement factor, if nothing else. :D

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    6. Re:Frosti pasto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it could work with a lot of things surrounding the stick.
      Try covering it in dough and break it apart.
      Perhaps it might even be one of the situations where you can find a use for putting ketchup on pasta.

    7. Re:Frosti pasto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, doesn't help. Might work in mercury though.

  3. Smarter Every Day covered 3 piece breaks in slo-mo by Solandri · · Score: 5, Informative

    Smarter Every Day covered spaghetti snapping into 3 pieces. Had to go all the way up to 250,000 fps to see what was happening.

  4. hmm, wrong spaghetti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With 5 pieces of angel hair spaghetti without twisting my results were as follows. 1st break was into 2 pieces, 2nd break was into 3 pieces, 3rd break was into 2 pieces, 4th break was into 4 or more pieces, 5th break was into 2 pieces. So, 2 out of 5 into 2 pieces without trying to twist.

  5. Yes! by NotFamous · · Score: 1

    Never have I wanted to volunteer for a study so much! Seriously, it seems like common sense - the snap-back effect. And of course, if you apply torque the rotation will blunt the snap-back. But don't even get me started about the sauce,

    --
    Some settling may occur during posting.
    1. Re:Yes! by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      And my mother could tell you how to do it she used to bend and break spaghetti like this all the time when I was growing up. She didn't have a pasta pot, so it had to be shorter to go in a saucepan.

  6. Wait, this was a mystery? by guruevi · · Score: 1

    I've been able to snap spaghetti in two for ages, parents of small children around the world have known for ages. I didn't even know it was a problem.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  7. Because, if you are like most people... by Immerial · · Score: 1

    ...you grip it at the center with both hands and snap. This is talking about grabbing the ends to snap, not the middle.

    1. Re:Because, if you are like most people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhm - it's been a drinking challenge/trick for at least 25 years. Challenge friends to break spaghetti in two, they can't but you can. Not the most impressive trick I learned drinking in College, but it's nice to know I learned something that people from MIT needed to build a machine and do a bunch of math to figure out. I can also throw a pumpkin over a 1 story house, walk on water and hit a golf ball over a half mile (all of those are super easy by the way, but I wonder if anyone from MIT can figure them out with just common sense).

    2. Re:Because, if you are like most people... by lgw · · Score: 1

      I can also throw a pumpkin over a 1 story house, walk on water and hit a golf ball over a half mile (all of those are super easy by the way, but I wonder if anyone from MIT can figure them out with just common sense).

      Trebuchet, trebuchet, and trebuchet?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Because, if you are like most people... by jae471 · · Score: 1

      Small pumpkin (like baseball size), small house. No problem.
      Pour cup of water on sidewalk. Now walk on it. You're "walking on water".
      ???

    4. Re:Because, if you are like most people... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Oh, all 3 can be solved by adding a hill (or cliff) to the set-up, if you want to be serious about it. But punkin chunkin is way more fun.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Because, if you are like most people... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      I can jump higher than the average house.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    6. Re: Because, if you are like most people... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Most people can.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    7. Re: Because, if you are like most people... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Shhhhh... Don't give away the secret. :p

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    8. Re:Because, if you are like most people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always suspected walking on water involved some kind of extremely high sodium levels to increase buoyancy to the point where one doesn't sink if they keep moving. I've wondered if a strong enough storm could stir up enough sodium to achieve those levels of buoyancy, such that one would be at a greater risk of being struck by lighting, than drowning.

      I would hardly consider walking on water spilled on a sidewalk to be "walking on water". Nor would I consider an illusionists glass tables in a pool to be "walking on water".

  8. IG Nobel is a JOKE prize. Not the Nobel prize! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IG Nobel is for papers that are silly and pointless etc.
    Don't confuse it with the Nobel prize.

    Also, this theory is the very first one, anyone would come up, to answer this. I guessed it right, just before reading it. Like probably every single person here.
    Nice that they did check if that is true, but ... is there REALLY *nothing* more important to do?
    You know... like solving overpopulation or people becoming psychopathic assholes ... or even just common diseases.

  9. I make my spaghetti by hand you insensitive clod! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

    Real people roll their own.

    Dough you knot understand?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  10. How do you *not* bend it evenly? by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    How do you not bend spaghetti evenly from both ends? Is this one of those one hand clapping koans?

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:How do you *not* bend it evenly? by deviated_prevert · · Score: 1

      How do you not bend spaghetti evenly from both ends? Is this one of those one hand clapping koans?

      Take a stick of spaghetti into outer space and in weightlessness with no atmosphere shake it like a conductors baton. The energy imparted to the end of the pasta will cause the stick to bend progressively in a wave. If the energy in a shake is at frequencies the stick will break at the harmonic nodes of the frequency in relation to the mass/length of the pasta. In space a whole forest of pasta trees can fall and no one will hear them break.

      --
      This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
  11. Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not a physicist, nor do I work in anything like construction (or even the material world most of the time), but as soon as I read the first sentence, I thought, "Just twist it first."

    Maybe I'm so sort of idiot savant physicist, or maybe just a lucky idiot.

  12. Try fresh from a Spaghetti Tree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  13. Huh by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

    Whenever making pasta, I'd always twist and bend a bundle at the same time to make 2 roughly even halves. It's kinda funny to think my younger self could've saved them time.

    1. Re:Huh by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you're ignoring all the small pieces that break near the site of the main break (and fall into the boiling water).

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:Huh by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Your younger self could have written the mathematical model underlying the theory of how twisting the spaghetti prevents multiple breaks?
      Otherwise, you wouldn't have saved them any time.

  14. Important Question... by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    Will this make a bistromathic drive possible?

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:Important Question... by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Needs more research on lunch time noodles, should there be a way to distribute them evenly amongst an odd number of diners who can't count?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  15. The solution is obvious by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always get two perfect halves when I do the following - it's easy.

    1) bind the spaghetti together into a tight bundle, using a couple rubber bands. Be sure both rubber bands are fairly close to the center of the bundle.
    2) Run the bundle through a band saw.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  16. Tell that to my fibula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Broke my ankle (tibia) and subsequently broke my fibula with a 'twisting' motion of the bone, causing it to break in two just like a pencil (or noodle). Pointed ends and all (which were most uncomfortable as they ripped into my muscle).

    RRK

    1. Re:Tell that to my fibula by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      To quote Wile E. Coyote...

      ouch.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
  17. Dry pasta as a 'fry toy' by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Kinda fun-sounding science, but frankly this sounds like something someone who is stoned would start doing, sitting there for hours on end, breaking pieces of dry spaghetti, one at a time.

    1. Re:Dry pasta as a 'fry toy' by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

      In all honesty and respect for him, "but frankly this sounds like something someone who is stoned would start doing" could quite often describe Richard Feynman.

      --
      I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  18. Chuck Norris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chuck Norris can break an entire box of spaghetti into just two pieces.

  19. 39? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's with the '39 behind Feynman's name? The year he received his Bachelors? That seems oddly pedantic and irrelevant.? Other explainations

    1. Re:39? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. The cited source is a repost from the university news office. University's often indicate the year of graduation of alumni in publications.

  20. Re:Smarter Every Day covered 3 piece breaks in slo by Tsolias · · Score: 1

    He could have $200k grand and a PhD, but no... he chose to make a simple video.
    this sickens me.

  21. RTFM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wait.. thanks.

  22. Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just tried it. Snapped right in two. I tried 3 more and all the same. None broke in to more than two pieces.

    Barillia Whole Wheat spaghetti.

    1. Re:Uh, what? by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

      Whole wheat pasta tends to be more noodly even in it's dry form, it's probably more elastic and the shock waves dissipate quicker after the first crack.

      As for twisting, it puts different tension into the pasta that changes the harmonics upon snapping.

  23. How much did THAT cost? by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    Wonder how much taxpayers paid for that!

  24. solving the "spaghetti mystery" by PJ6 · · Score: 1

    (sound of forks clinking on plates)
    Frank: Whelp, looks like we solved the "spaghetti mystery".
    Joe: How about we solve the "cheeseburger mystery" next week?
    Bob: (trying to talk with a full mouth) ...mmm ...with math!

  25. Re:Smarter Every Day covered 3 piece breaks in slo by dead_user · · Score: 1

    I'd wager has has far north of $200k plus the PhD. Plus he got the chance to sit down with the president for a 1 on 1 about science education. Pretty solid cred if you ask me. Did you watch the video? It digs into the very science we are discussing.

  26. Re:I make my spaghetti by hand you insensitive clo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hour it takes to make your own is worth more than the 49 cents a box of store noodles cost. If I want 5 star quality food, I go to a 5 star restaurant.

  27. Who the hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funded this and how did it take MIT guys to figure it out?
    Ask literally anyone who knows a few things about historical weapons and they'll tell you what's happening.

    #1 Ever seen a thin sword breaking into multiple pieces in slow-mo? It usually breaks at one initial high-stress bend point, then the whiplash effect from the blade springing back often throws another smaller chunk off. The two breaks may even be separately visible without slowing it down, but obviously it's not a good idea to be looking when it happens.

    #2 Traditional wooden bows.
    Draw the arrow back and release it immediately. The shot is measurably faster than drawing it back and holding it for a minute.
    The material in the bow starts to fatigue and deform slightly under stress and you lose a little shot energy the more cell walls give out.

    Bend a piece of spaghetti *slowly* and surprise! It's probably going to break in two. The energy that would normally whiplash those two pieces into three was wasted on tiny inelastic deformations in the material instead of springy elastic ones.

  28. It also works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when you put two of your fingers close to each other and not at the ends. Or if the spaghetti piece in question is just as long as two thumbs.

  29. If I would have known this was a thing... by WindowsStar · · Score: 1

    Wow it took MIT 12 years to come up with the answer I already had. About 20 years ago a teacher told the class about the spaghetti mystery. We broke spaghetti in class and it always broke in 3 or 4 pieces. I was so intrigued by this I went home that night and went through 2 boxes of spaghetti when I figured out that twisting them a bit would make them break in half. I was so excited about the discovery we talked about it in class the next day. If I would have known this was a thing...I would have written it down and sent it in. All my classmates and the Teacher just gave it a wow factor and class went on. SMH!

    1. Re:If I would have known this was a thing... by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Again, the point is not that twisting spaghetti was a discovery, but that they developed a mathematical model that explains how that works.

    2. Re:If I would have known this was a thing... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      no, actually the point is that even Richard Fucking Feynmann didn't figure out the twist, forget about modeling when your brain can't even go outside the pasta snapping box that far.

  30. Should Have Done Research by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    These people have a lot of free time.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  31. speaking as a pastafarian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... you heathens need to stop this sacrilegious torture at once, or the almighty will strike you down with his noodley appendage!

  32. Re:Hoxnoxious is a boring old faggot, pity the bit by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Your mom paid me. Does that count?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  33. Re:A great day for Slashdot (APK is gone) by fisted · · Score: 1

    Damn, that true?

    APK, I want to install your host file program, where can I download it? And is it any good?

  34. Of all the world's pressing issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, wtf? Of all the problems in the world today that need to be solved, we have some of the brightest minds wasting their time breaking spaghetti?

    Priorities, people...

    1. Re:Of all the world's pressing issues by ledow · · Score: 2

      Sigh.

      Allow me to explain once again.

      Intellectual puzzles like this lead to real-world mathematics that gets incorporated into huge things like engineering tables and safety laws, that translate to real-world buildings, runways, etc. that "work better" in some fashion than they otherwise would.

      Why does a material, under stress, fracture elsewhere than the stress point? That seems to me to be an incredibly important thing to understand, especially if you're putting your main masses on those secondary/tertiary snapping points "because you don't want to put it all in the middle".

      Maths, pure maths, is called pure for a reason and doesn't have an immediate "point". But it underlies every single thing you ever do because it underlies computer science, physics, chemistry, engineering and all kinds of other disciplines which use the findings of pure maths in their calculations for applied maths.

      "What good is calculus, it's just areas under a graph!" is the kind of fucking stupidity that you get from such people, not realising just how much that simple concept underlies everything you touch, from power through a cable over time to how to calculate volumes of large objects, to everything imaginable - weather forecasting, stress-measurement on moving parts, etc etc.

  35. Re:Smarter Every Day covered 3 piece breaks in slo by BlackOverflow · · Score: 0

    $200k grand is 200,000 thousand. That's $200 million. So you are correct, it is far north of $200k!

  36. Re:A great day for Slashdot (APK is gone) by BlackOverflow · · Score: 0

    It's about time, but I'm glad they banned him!

  37. I wished I'd known by shaitand · · Score: 1

    If I'd realized someone was trying to solve this problem I could have helped out. I've been snapping spaghetti in this manner for as long as I can remember sans fancy rig.

  38. Seems obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DO NOT!

    I repeat do NOT eat age old spaghetti.

  39. Question by bigdavex · · Score: 1

    Physics is neat.

    Also, why don't they make spaghetti smaller? Would people who make spaghetti in giant pots object to spaghetti sized for normal pots?

    --
    -Dave
  40. Re:Smarter Every Day covered 3 piece breaks in slo by Tsolias · · Score: 1

    yeah, I saw the video, a well-done one.

  41. Re:Smarter Every Day covered 3 piece breaks in slo by Tsolias · · Score: 1

    I meant to say "grant"
    excuse my ignorance.