Slashdot Mirror


India Pushes Back Against Tech 'Colonization' by Internet Giants (nytimes.com)

In India, American companies dominate the internet. Facebook's WhatsApp is the most popular app on phones. Virtually every smartphone runs on Google's Android system. YouTube is the favorite video platform and Amazon is the No. 2 online retailer. For some Indian political leaders, it is as if their nation --which was ruled by Britain for a century until 1947 -- is being conquered by colonial powers all over again. And they are determined to stop it. From a report: "As a country, we have to all grow up and say that, you know, enough of this," Vinit Goenka, a railways official who works on technology policy for India's governing Bharatiya Janata Party, said at a conference last week. In recent months, regulators and ministers across India's government have declared their intention to impose tough new rules on the technology industry. Collectively, the regulations would end the free rein that American tech giants have long enjoyed in this country of 1.3 billion people, which is the world's fastest-growing market for new internet users. The proposals include European-style limits on what big internet companies can do with users' personal data, a requirement that tech firms store certain sensitive data about Indians only within the country, and restrictions on the ability of foreign-owned e-commerce companies to undercut local businesses on price. Matthew Prince, CEO of Cloudflare, commented on the story, saying, "India is currently the most important country in term of defining the future of Internet policy. It sits at the fulcrum between the United States and China. As it goes, so goes the world."

102 of 176 comments (clear)

  1. IBM in India by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the 1960's, IBM chose to leave the market in India because of how the government tried to force them to do business.

    1. Re: IBM in India by kenh · · Score: 2

      Doesn't surprise me - I can easily imagine the local officials saying 'hey, it's not like they are going to walk away from a 750 million customer country!'

      Yes, they would.

      Those curious about government attempts would do well to research the US government's purchasing requirement to only buy computers/periphersls that use ASCII character representation. The US gov't thought they could change 'Big Blue', but they were wrong...

      --
      Ken
    2. Re:IBM in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And then in less than 25 years IBM became totally irrelevant. Good job.

    3. Re: IBM in India by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Linux on system-z uses ASCII, not EBCDIC.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re: IBM in India by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Doesn't surprise me - I can easily imagine the local officials saying 'hey, it's not like they are going to walk away from a 750 million customer country!'

      Yes, they would.

      Those curious about government attempts would do well to research the US government's purchasing requirement to only buy computers/periphersls that use ASCII character representation. The US gov't thought they could change 'Big Blue', but they were wrong...

      The US government is still there, but "Big Blue" has had to try to remake itself.

      And things have changed a lot since the days when Big Blue was holding a big stick. Today, there's not a big tech company in the world that will turn away from three quarters of a billion customers.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:IBM in India by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      All it says is they're considering making some rules, it doesn't actually say anything about forcing the Indian people to choose locally-owned apps.

    6. Re:IBM in India by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes, and for the same reason, they tried to force their customers to do business the way they wanted because, hey, you can't get around us.

      Li'l hint to all corporations and governments that are likewise arrogant: Yes, we can get around you. One way or another.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:IBM in India by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the 1960's, IBM chose to leave the market in India because of how the government tried to force them to do business.

      . . . and today, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... :

      "Since 2006, IBM has been the multinational with the largest number of employees in India. IBM is very secretive about the geographic distribution of its employees. By most estimates, it has close to a third of its 430,000 employees (~ 100,000) in India, and it likely has more employees there than in the US."

      Indian Business Machines, indeed.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    8. Re: IBM in India by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      An important detail: they are all people who left India to be successful. Sure, they're keen on locating proles there to do the heavy lifting. They're not staying there and working as management under the Indian government's regime.

      They understand India and the Indian market better than westerners would.

    9. Re:IBM in India by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      IBM did succeed in defining most of what mainstream PC technology grew into.

      Okay, they pushed hard for Microchannel, which didn't stay in the mainstream hardware. PCI isn't IBM's thing. But the whole x86 architecture, the hardware/software stack, is something that IBM started.

      We all, even Apple these days, have hardware that lives in IBM's shadow.

    10. Re:IBM in India by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Times change. My comment was meant as a historical reference. IBM is huge in India now.

    11. Re:IBM in India by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      x86 was 'off the shelf' when IBM selected it for the first PC. They licensed PC-DOS from Gates.

      The only thing they built was the bios, which Compaq reverse engineered for us.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    12. Re:IBM in India by kenh · · Score: 1

      Wow, you have a limited understanding of IBMs offerings & technology.

      Maybe take a moment and look into a little thing IBM made real popular in the 1970s - virtual machines, particularly their VM and later MVS operating systems (through all their various forms). IBM was making computers for decades before they dropped Microchannel on the PC industry - and for the record, microchannel was successful in the non-PC AIX workstation market for a while.

      --
      Ken
    13. Re:IBM in India by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      IBM designed and championed the open architecture. The ISA bus, with slots with a particular pinout. The BIOS source code for machines up to the PC-AT was published in the tech ref manual which any customer could purchase. And not just the BIOS source code on the motherboard. The BIOS extensions on the EGA card and on the Hard Disk controller card (Xebec generation) were published in source code form. Also stuff like the schematics for the floppy drive, hard drive, power supply, etc. They were very open.

      The memory map, the I/O model, the DMA controller model, etc. Some of what they picked was from Intel's reference design but not all of it. They chose the 8250 for the USART instead of Intel's 8251. That's quite a significant departure from Intel's reference design.

      Some of their choices were even boneheaded and stunted, like cramming I/O and peripherals at the top of the meory map, boxing the memory scheme into just 640K. (when the IBM-PC first came out, the early motherboards had one row of 16K chips soldered on and three rows of sockets for another 48K of 16K chips. Memory beyond that had to go in a card on the ISA slot)

      And what IBM 'created' was an open architecture. They didn't prohibit other vendors from producing ISA bus cards or even motherboards that incorporated ISA bus slots.

      They poisoned the 'BIOS cloning' market by publishing the full BIOS source code. Most of the people qualified to write a BIOS clone would have already looked at IBM's commented source code, thus contaminating them as possible programmers to develop a 'compatible' BIOS.

      Intel started out in the late 60's as primarily a supplier of DRAM to IBM, incidentally.

    14. Re:IBM in India by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      No, obviously I know about the other stuff. I have an IBM AIX workstation in my collection that is Microchannel architecture. It's a Power 1 architecture system. The Power 1 chipset is on one of the microchannel cards.

      But their microchannel Initiative in the PC market was their failed attempt to pull things back in a proprietary direction after their Open Architecture got way out of their control.

      IBM did a ton of things with Minicomputers and Mainframes that I didn't mention.

      IBM was a data processing company (punched card decks as databases, with card sorters, readers, printers to print selected fields off of cards, etc.) long before computers even existed. They were an IT company before the digital computer was invented.

    15. Re:IBM in India by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      OPEN architecture? Yes, with ISA, when they thought nobody would come and copy their stuff, but you might want to read up on MCA. And how IBM got punched on the nose for it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re:IBM in India by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      MCA was successful with AIX but it failed miserably in the PC market due to licensing and a similar EISA bus being introduced by competition that wasn't weighed down with patents and licensing fees.

      IBM tried to regain control over the PC market but failed, simply because by the time they tried, they were about as well liked as MS is today, seen as an overbearing control freak trying to dictate what you can and cannot do with the systems they sell you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re: IBM in India by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Not all people are customers. Being a starving peasant living in poverty does not make you a customer.

      All this points to the same fucking thing, US intelligence agencies just had to play idiot fuckwit games and now no one trusts US corporations and major countries are striving to force localised development.

      The big winner going forward FOSS because it gives a major head start to independent technology production.

      I see a major global fracturing taking place, between the haves and the have nots. Those who have control over the technology infrastructure of their country and the technoslave states, those who have given control of the technological infrastructure to other countries, the off switch, the privacy switch, the data control switch (who and what your citizens are).

      Technoslaves those who do not control their digital lives be they individuals or countries.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. Wonder how this will be enforced? by kenh · · Score: 1

    and restrictions on the ability of foreign-owned e-commerce companies to undercut local businesses on price.

    What is the incentive for Indian companies to lower prices?

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:Wonder how this will be enforced? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      No exchange rate and no need to send profits out of India. Tax considerations.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re: Wonder how this will be enforced? by locketine · · Score: 1

      That's how they'll make more money, not how to incentivize them to lower prices. Competition is key to lowering prices but it doesn't need to come from abroad as the parent comment suggests.

      --
      Think globally but act within local variable scope.
    3. Re: Wonder how this will be enforced? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      "Tax" considerations will do.
      Call it a new basic customs duty on imported tech. Then all the extra parts that go with the tech get a tax. Battery, headset, chargers.
      That extra price makes all domestic products look great. The repatriation strategy can also get looked at for Indian tax liabilities.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  3. Their Turn by Geodesy99 · · Score: 1

    Inevitable, and only reasonable that instead of foreign conglomerates exploiting their markets through colonialism, that it be replaced by indigenous exploitation of their own people through corruption. :-) See "India Continues To Rank Among Most Corrupt Countries In The World" ( https://www.forbes.com/sites/r... ).

  4. Make India Great Again by DanielTanner · · Score: 1

    Start passing out the MIGA hats!

    1. Re:Make India Great Again by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Start passing out the MIGA hats!

      Too late. India is already run by a demagogue worse than Trump.

      Modi helped to instigate, and did nothing to stop, the 2002 Gujarat Riots that killed 2000 people.

  5. Re: Nationalism fad spreading by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Yoda says "has".

  6. Silly Indians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "For some Indian political leaders, it is as if their nation -- which was ruled by Britain for a century until 1947 -- is being conquered by colonial powers all over again. And they are determined to stop it."

    How about this: we will keep our tech sites (and our technology) and you can keep your H-1Bs. Sound fair?

    Globalization is a two-way street, bitches.

    1. Re:Silly Indians... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How about this: we will keep our tech sites (and our technology) and you can keep your H-1Bs. Sound fair?

      Are you certain that your "tech sites" could function without the H1-Bs?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Silly Indians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Likely yes, hiring locals instead of foreign temps who work for peanuts.

    3. Re: Silly Indians... by locketine · · Score: 1

      While I agree that H1-B's suppress wage growth for tech jobs, we're currently experiencing a worker shortage. That shortage is improving salaries but also starves startups of talent needed to build their products. I don't think it's a bad thing but it is an important consideration.

      --
      Think globally but act within local variable scope.
    4. Re: Silly Indians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      we're currently experiencing a worker shortage

      Only a shortage of those that will work for peanuts.

      If you're not actually in management, then you've fallen for what is pretty clearly a lie.

      Only when my company was bought out and new management took over was there suddenly a "tech worker shortage" in our area. The shortage coincided with two percent raises and firings of those who were already making decent pay.

    5. Re: Silly Indians... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      There isn't a worker shortage. What there's a shortage of is workers willing to take shit wages and horrible working conditions. H1Bs fill that gap nicely.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:Silly Indians... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Are you certain that your "tech sites" could function without the H1-Bs?

      They could probably function better. Of course, some of the larger companies might have to substantially change the way they do business, but that would result either in them creating more jobs for citizens, or in them going out of business and letting someone else do that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Silly Indians... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      They'd have to pay out more of their profits to American workers, though. And that, pretty much everyone agrees, is a tragedy that must never be allowed to happen. The deplorables must never win.

      American workers are not "deplorables". You don't find a lot of the people you would call "deplorable" in Silicon Valley.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:Silly Indians... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      They could probably function better.

      Why is that? Do Indian workers "monkey" things up where you are?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:Silly Indians... by kenh · · Score: 2

      They are equating e-commerce sites with colonization - the comparison is asinine. If Amazon can sell curry to Indians cheaper than native Indian e-commerce sites can sell it, the issue isn't Amazon, it's the Indian culture and business practices that make their costs higher. What these politicians are saying is rather than change their practices and customs, they want Indian citizens to pay a premium and support local businesses... This is something many nations struggle with, it is not a uniquely Indian issue.

      --
      Ken
    10. Re:Silly Indians... by bobmagicii · · Score: 1

      "As a country, we have to all grow up and say that, you know, enough of this" you and u.s. both, friends. i already said i don't want youtube red, dammit!

    11. Re:Silly Indians... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Apparently everyone monkeys it up everywhere! It's just a phrase.
      Ooo ooo ooo *flings poo*

      https://www.realclearpolitics....
      30 seconds in.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  7. Why different? by aglider · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > it is as if their nation --which was ruled by Britain for a century until 1947 -- is being conquered by colonial powers all over again.

    How can they dream to be different from almost all other countries?
    If you skip the self colonized USA and Cina, everyone else is colonized by the tech giants.

    Can they afford the difference?

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    1. Re:Why different? by houghi · · Score: 1

      With the size of their population? I think they can.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Why different? by aglider · · Score: 1

      How could they?
      They can skip Google/Amazon altogether and will recluse themselves away from the "other part of the world".
      Which is called the "internal market".

      --
      Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  8. ...So Program Your Own? by Voyager529 · · Score: 2

    I mean, maybe there's a smidge of a thing somwhere in here...but let's be real: it's not like India is incapable of rolling their own alternatives. In aggregate, they've got enough programming talent, and it's not like WhatsApp is some unicorn of an app that has impossible-to-replicate requirements. If India wanted to make a legit alternative to Android, WhatsApp, and Youtube, they are not lacking in the human or technical resources to do it within a very short period of time. It might take a little bit for the network effect to kick in, but if North Korea can roll their own Linux distro, it is well within the realm of India to provide competitive applications.

    1. Re:...So Program Your Own? by Visarga · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > it's not like India is incapable of rolling their own alternatives

      Then there is the teeny weeny problem of convincing the masses to switch to the new Indian alternative apps, that come bundled with government surveillance. Who would do that? It's safer to be spied upon by multinationals than your own govt.

    2. Re:...So Program Your Own? by cmseagle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's OP's point. The fact that India isn't producing homegrown killer apps has little to do with a lack of technical talent or resources. It comes down to difficulty of doing business and political interference (and probably myriad other causes).

    3. Re:...So Program Your Own? by kenh · · Score: 1

      The regulations are about prices on e-commerce sites - think Amazon, Bangood, etc., not YouTube.

      --
      Ken
  9. Re: Nationalism fad spreading by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    A penny spar'd is twice got.

  10. India, land of corpses and feces and open sewers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    They are born in filth and die filth.

    India, a nation of street shitters.

  11. Be careful of American sabotage and intervention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    they are not shy about doing what it takes to get market share. People may even be assassinated if they are perceived to be too big of an obstacle in the expansion of American markets and the establishment of American corporation dominance.

    Just look at these things played out in south and latin America during the 20th century. India is an even bigger and more desirable market.

  12. Re: Nationalism fad spreading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Only then will douche you not be.

    A douche they will still be, translocated they has.

  13. translation by Escogido · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Indians use these services, but profits from these services go overseas. And I just happen to have some wealthy local friends who would like a slice of this pie. And, being a politician, I am playing a patriotism card for them, to pave the way for the popular movement to support local product-to-be."

    Nothing wrong or even unusual about it though; it's about as ethical (or unethical, depending on one's PoV) as the "eat locally grown food" slogan. In theory, if they are capable of creating an alternative to (at least some subset of) Google services, some new competition is always good for the market and so good for everyone. But what usually happens is they start applying external pressure by putting services in unequal conditions by subsidizing locals or even doing darker things like throttling traffic at state level or limiting their capability to earn revenue through regulatory measures. Eh, I'm not a globalization fan either, so whatever.

    1. Re:translation by Escogido · · Score: 2

      Oh I certainly am a fan of the concept of a state acting in the interests of their citizens. But does this really happen in today's world, in large countries?

      I guess I am jaded, and would love to be wrong on this one, but not really holding my breath much.

    2. Re:translation by Escogido · · Score: 1

      I understand very well what you mean, but differences in perception of "what is best for them" by citizens of different nations aren't really important here. I take it without any doubt that each state is in general capable of creating the best business environment according to that state's citizens' tastes. It's true that there are states that have a long history of free market ideology, so they are doing kind of OK-ish in this regard. But at this stage in humanity in general the wind blows the other way; most states make changes in their economy according to what the rich people in those states want (well if you discount states that act in US or Chinese corporations' interests that is). So in old-school-capitalist countries new market regulations are usually being passed against the interest of the public, and in developing countries the trend is also towards more authoritarian and protectionist economy. You'd be hard pressed to find a single "big" country within last 20-30 years or so that succeeded at creating the kind of business environment necessary for innovation-based businesses to proliferate. The best examples are city-states like Singapore and Hong Kong, which obviously wouldn't apply to India (hence my "big" qualifier). I think the best role model for India is China, the ultimate in protectionism.

      I think of it this way. As a government, you could:

      - pass state-level programmes that help innovation-based businesses, take a hit in taxes, and HOPE that it will be worth it one day

      or

      - copycat existing products that are proven to work, at the local rich people's coin, and/or
      - make it hard for said product owners' to compete, as an option even going China way
      while all the same time rooting for the population to "support your country - switch to local services"

      which would they choose?

      And these are not even mutually exclusive; it's perfectly possible to start setting up local innovation business scene by using the revenue created by someone else's ideas. So sorry, but I don't really see how it is possible NOT having ulterior motives in this matter.

    3. Re:translation by jezwel · · Score: 1

      But does this really happen in today's world, in large countries?

      That's a good question. Lets assume the goal of a state is to act in the interest of their citizens, all or a limited number of them.
      ; If countries like Germany and France are considered big, then perhaps yes. Even though UK likes to be a bastion of liberalism, they too appear to consider their state sovereignty and public benefit as important concepts..

      The problem comes when the 'limited number' is primarily politicians and their donors.

    4. Re:translation by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I find it funny they're complaining about services they didn't invent or startup, and then complain that they're not sufficiently to India's benefit. Being technical and being creative are two different things, so perhaps they should focus more on developing and providing their own vision.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  14. Re:India, land of corpses and feces and open sewer by BLToday · · Score: 2

    So San Francisco without the expensive real estate and drugs.

  15. Why principles matter... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    ... Why as a Chinese or Indian person should I use American companies that provide no benefit over domestic institutions?

    They've compromised principles of freedom of speech... kowtowed to the censorship of Tienanmen Square etc... why would I bother with the American version when the domestic version is the same thing?

    They hollowed out a lot of the American infrastructure, outsourced like crazy, adopted a lowest common denominator policy regarding how they conduct freedom of speech...

    And what did they get for it?

    As soon as they're done hollowing out the IP advantage they're going to cut these companies out of the loop and laugh.

    Frankly, it can't happen soon enough. The nauseating arrogance out of Google etc can't end soon enough.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Why principles matter... by temcat · · Score: 1

      Just stop using the products of those American companies. No government intervention needed.

      BTW, your mention freedom of speech is especially laughable. Yeah, sure, as a Chinese or Indian person, you can totally expect the domestic business to provide you better freedom of speech with the helping hand of your freedom-loving government.

    2. Re:Why principles matter... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      As to laughable... if both treat the same person the same... then they're the same.

      If google lets teh chinese government spy on their people through the google service then why use google?

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    3. Re: Why principles matter... by locketine · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because it's a better product. The whole reason Google is considering adapting to Chinese censorship is because they know that they have the best product but can't "sell it" without Chinese government approval. The real problem is that Google would be relieving social pressure on the Chinese government to change its information policies.

      --
      Think globally but act within local variable scope.
    4. Re:Why principles matter... by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, considering the fact that an american business would force both american (can't say n****) and local (can't insult the ruler) restrictions, while a local would only force local restrictions, it is possible that a local business would allow more freedom of speech.

    5. Re: Why principles matter... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter. Because even if you are better, they're going to start censoring your platform to promote theirs.

      What has cooperation gotten you?

      You had to give up IP.
      You had to train you competition.
      You had to compromise your product.
      You had to compromise your principles.

      And in return, they'll take everything they took from you, build your replacement, and ban your product from market.

      It was folly.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    6. Re: Why principles matter... by locketine · · Score: 1

      You're talking about outsourcing manufacturing of a product or product line to Chinese companies, not adapting a service to meet Chinese government requirements. What IP will Google give up in this process? What training will they provide? The answer is none.

      The only part of your argument that applies to this situation is the one about Google compromising on their principles and I already agreed with you there.

      --
      Think globally but act within local variable scope.
    7. Re: Why principles matter... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      No, I'm talking about both and more. As to IP transfers, that is a well established and much complained about feature. Many companies have complained about it from not just the US but also from Europe. As to training, that is a requirement for outsourcing. How do you outsource if you don't train your outsourced firm? Your statement is at best irrational.

      To this you conclude "none"... I'm not going to argue with someone that points at the Sun in the sky and claims it isn't there.

      Good day, sir.
      http://heeereswilly.ytmnd.com/

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    8. Re:Why principles matter... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Guy who hides his posts attacks someone else's post history... where the AC in question got donkey stomped... and is clearly so butt hurt about it still that he is trolling the person that crushed the AC's position.

      https://youtu.be/8X48RiKQmFQ?t...

      You can't win by whining at me like a sick dog. You have no moral superiority, no intellectual superiority... Every time you act like a degenerate, I feel more vindicated in my position. You're boosting my ego. Do you realize that? You're failing so hard at trolling, you're more my cheerleader.

      Keep it up, chump.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    9. Re:Why principles matter... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      I said YOU... "you"... Personally... could come up with ANY system... any system what so ever... design it however you like to set up a voter ID system so that only people authorized to vote can vote.

      And you said that was impossible.

      Never mind that nearly everyone has driver's licenses. Guess those are racist too, Chump?

      Passports... racist... Fishing licenses... racist...

      You're an idiot.

      You say "I" live in a strange reality.

      You missed the bit where "you" criticize "my" post history whilst hiding yours.

      You're a hypocrite at best... and we know that you're far worse. That's been empirically established at this point.

      Now here you are, pathetically following me from thread to thread... shamefully hiding YOUR post history... whilst attacking people making sensible comments to this board.

      You haven't a leg to stand on, Chump.

      You never did.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    10. Re:Why principles matter... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Because revealing your obvious sophistry shouldn't be too hard...

      Do tell, define the sort of evidence you would accept.

      If you refuse to cite a type or cite something silly like "aliens arrive from mars and tell me"... then you'll have confessed to request information in bad faith.

      If you accept and cite a reasonable standard of evidence, then I'll provide it and that will be checkmate.

      Do it, Chump.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    11. Re:Why principles matter... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      And just because you're honestly boring...

      https://www.texasattorneygener...

      There are people getting charged with voter fraud all the time.

      The system is open to abuse. Many government agencies have been cautioning for years that it has to be tightened up. People are getting caught committing voter fraud. People are admitting to committing voter fraud.

      Non-citizens in the US for example tend to get caught when they apply for US citizenship. See, your citizenship isn't checked when you register to vote. It isn't checked when you walk into that polling station and actually vote.

      But it "IS" checked when you apply for citizenship and it shows up that you voted even though you weren't a citizen.

      That's a matter of public record.

      So how are you going to try and weasel your way out of it?

      Furthermore, just out of curiosity... are you even an American? I only ask because it seems every time I get into this argument with someone on the internet they're always from Europe or elsewhere. Aka... places that don't know what they're talking about. Just curious if there were some mild excuse for your obnoxiousness.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    12. Re:Why principles matter... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      liar liar.

      To prove you're a liar again on top of the lie just there...

      Let us say we didn't do an ID at all but merely cross referenced the citizenship database with the voter registration database?

      because we don't do that.

      can we do that?

      It would not require US citizens to do anything. The two databases would just be be compared.

      I suspect that is also voter suppression, right... Liar?

      https://www.supremecourt.gov/o...

      Supreme court cites a pew study you would look at in that PDF if you have integrity... you don't so... meh.

      https://www.denverpost.com/201...

      Evidence of double voting.

      https://www.justice.gov/usao-w...

      Department of justice catching non-citizens voting some how even though you say that's impossible... because you're a lying retard.

      https://www.ice.gov/news/relea...

      Ice nabbing non-citizens voting.

      I'm sorry, your tired stupid talking points fool only the fools. Peddle your sad lies elsewhere.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    13. Re:Why principles matter... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      You proved my point again by refusing cross referencing a database of US citizens with the voter registry.

      No inconvenience or expense to the poor voters you say I'm trying to do vote tampering against.

      You've confessed.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    14. Re:Why principles matter... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      First, you're likely the same sad AC attempting to appear more authoritative by making another comment pretending to be a third party. Keep in mind, if you were, it would look exactly like that post. As such, I have to assume you're probably the same sad fellow.

      Second, I did actually validate my position. If you look at the thread, I've posted links that support my position. But just because I don't mind beating dead horse arguments in the street to prove you have no case:
      Look at the cited Pew study... that's the supreme court.
      https://www.supremecourt.gov/o...
      Double voting in kansas:
      https://www.denverpost.com/201...
      Voter fraud:
      https://www.justice.gov/usao-w...
      Ice catching some non-citizens illegally voting:
      https://www.ice.gov/news/relea...

      So... no.

      Third, my insults actually come AFTER and indifferent to my arguments. Many people don't seem to know what an Ad Hominem is in the first place. An ad hominem is not me saying 1+1=2 because logic... and you're an idiot. An Ad hominem is me saying "1+1=2" BECAUSE you're an idiot.

      My arguments in this discussion are not reliant on my insults. My insults are secondary observations of another's character.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    15. Re:Why principles matter... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I comment to people all the time without saying they're degenerates.

      I only do this when people act like degenerates. It just so happens that you've seen some degenerates attempt to dog pile me a few times.

      This doesn't mean I "always" do this anymore than a woman hits everything with a fly swatter... Just flies.

      You can go through my post history and whilst there are quite a few salty people that don't like me because I contradict obviously bad position they've taken... I have very friendly interactions with people... including people I disagree with.

      But when people lie, when people act deceitfully, when people substitute stubbornness for a sound argument... what is the judgement of them?

      They're obviously not worthy of a good opinion when they do that.

      Which leaves me with two options... I can either keep the obvious conclusion that they're degenerates to myself in some misguided notion of civility... or I can honestly call a turd a turd.

      Now you probably wonder why I consider it misguided to be civil with people that aren't being civil with me. Well, for the same reason I don't treat someone like a guest after they pull their pants down and defecate on my couch.

      If someone wants to be treated civilly they have to obey some basic rules of civility. In every case I unload on someone, I can show you an incident either in that post or a prior one where the individual forfeited that courtesy.

      To continue to extend the courtesy after faith has been broken is like loaning money to someone that robbed your bank.

      I do not start the hostile posting. I defend myself.

      I dare you to find I've done otherwise. And if you can, I'll concede at least in that incident that you're right. Care to accept my gambit? If not, appreciate that I will feel some justification in ignoring an undefended and unsubstantiated argument.

      Good day, sir.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    16. Re:Why principles matter... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Actually not... I'll go through my post history if you want and rifle through it.

      Note... comments between me and the SAME trolling AC are hardly evidence of anything but a persistent crying individual that literally searching my account every time he posts to see if I've commented on anything... and then says something stupid to remind me that he's still throwing a temper tantrum.

      We'll start with the interactions I've had with "you".

      I clearly disagree with you. But I also am not insulting you. Why is that? Because I don't perceive you as crossing a line of civility yet. Evidence of my behavioral model starts there. If "you" were right, then I'd probably have been very rude to you without provocation. Correct? But I didn't.

      Regardless, here are time stamped examples:
      Sep 1
      https://slashdot.org/comments....
      Aug 29
      https://slashdot.org/comments....
      Aug 28
      https://slashdot.org/comments....
      Aug 4
      https://slashdot.org/comments....
      July 31
      https://slashdot.org/comments....
      July 29
      https://slashdot.org/comments....

      Heated arguments happen with name calling... I didn't deny it. I instead said it was justified.

      See, I provided specific posts and threads. You didn't.

      Why? I suspect because you know that I am right. That I was provoked before responding with hostility.

      Take this very thread where the AC you're ultimately defending attacked me for something I said in another thread that wasn't even related to this thread. Think about that. Maybe you don't have to deal with this because you post under an AC tag. I don't. That means you can search my post history.

      Why can't I search yours? Maybe you're just dropping N bombs and encouraging pedophilia in your posts? I would have no way to know that. You hide your post history. If I did the same you wouldn't be able to go through my posts at all.

      Now, since you've failed to make a specific citation from my post history that you want to defend, I have to assume you're surrendering the issue. I cited specific threads. You can either cite something specific from my record which I allow you to search and read... unlike your record which you hide... or you are conceding the argument by default.

      That isn't me being hostile. That's you refusing to move your piece in a chess game. That's a forfeit.

      Good day, sir.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    17. Re:Why principles matter... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      First, you didn't cite a single discussion you wanted to use for evidence.

      Not one.

      You instead vaguely cited all of them in the assumption that would qualify as evidence whilst freeing you from any obligation to defend your citation. I've already pointed this out.

      You can cite a specific discussion you want and then show some integrity by defending it. Or... you're just doubling down on a failed argument.

      Second, as to cherry picking, again... you can see how I've conducted this discussion with you. This is pretty typical of my conduct. I've treated you with all due respect and civility. I do that with everyone until they act like a degenerate.

      Here you say "but you've been hostile with so many people!"... true... but that leaves us with one of two conclusions... either I treat good people badly or the internet is full of degenerates.

      You can see I'm on pretty solid ground here.

      Anyway, I suspect you're not going to make a citation... and if you're not going to do that, I'll ask you kindly to just accept that no one can take your position seriously if you're not willing to make a specific citation you're willing to defend.

      And as no one can take this seriously... Just let it go. Let us part on pleasant grounds... you are aware of what comes if you keep pushing this in bad faith.

      Kindly stop talking to me if you're going to accuse me of things you won't substantiate. It is rude.

      Good day, sir.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    18. Re:Why principles matter... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      The citation didn't involve me being hostile with anyone.

      You example fails. I simply said an argument was irrational and thus bad faith had to be assumed when it was made.

      That isn't breaking codes of civility.

      Try again.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    19. Re:Why principles matter... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      quote it... and we'll see if I can justify it.

      If I can't then I'll concede the point to you. If I can, then you'll have to find evidence that actually is evidence of anything besides my position.

      I looked over that thread and didn't see your argument there.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  16. Re:Nationalism fad spreading by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Muahahah, see, nobody asks about the USA or USSR when you bring Nazi Germany on the table! It's like shooting 100,000 Iranians and two dentists.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  17. Re:Nationalism fad spreading by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Whoever came up with Yoda's speech pattern really loved postfix notation...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  18. Re:India, land of corpses and feces and open sewer by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    No drugs?

    Damn, there's always a catch.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. Well, try to roll your own by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    If you don't want to buy from abroad, it's time to make your own.

    But when I look at the quality we usually get from our outsourced "partners"... I have a hunch I know why you don't.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  20. Re:on the other hand by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    India leads the world in cold-calling supposed Microsoft support phone calls and virus removal.

    Because responding to Windows problems takes a billion-person support team.

  21. Does India think colonialism only goes one way? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Colonialism is an emergent property of power:

    https://www.businessinsider.co...

  22. No Good by stooo · · Score: 1

    ASCII is no good in India.

    --
    aaaaaaa
  23. they're Indian services after all. by sad_ · · Score: 1

    "Indians use these services, but profits from these services go overseas."

    and with the profits of those services they pay the wages of the programmers, which are most likely... in India.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    1. Re:they're Indian services after all. by nnet · · Score: 1

      Where are all the Indian VCs?

    2. Re:they're Indian services after all. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      San Jose.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  24. Made in India by spinitch · · Score: 1

    Supporting home team good spirit but might not be the smart bet. Create an environment to compete and develop tech capabilities. Plenty of Indians contributing to the tech as staff and increasingly execs just in overseas companies where investors more confident in parking capital. Impatient populist politics have a fair risk of underperforming yet may still pass.

  25. Re:Nationalism fad spreading by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Begun, the trade wars has. -Yoda

    It has been going a lot longer than this with India. India has had a very protectionist economy for decades; it's probably one of the main reasons why China became an economic powerhouse- and India is growing much slower, despite being on better terms with most of the developed nations of the world than China.

    India doesn't like foreign companies operating on their seas- they used to keep out grocery stores, department stores from over seas- now they are pushing against IT. I understand why they're doing it, and the history there... but it's shooting themselves in the foot. Once they stop being a protectionist state, they could start to rise in power and eventually challenge the US and China.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  26. Re:IBM in still in China by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    IBM is somewhat huge in India now. I referred to the period of the 1960s, when IBM punished India technologically for their nativism.

  27. Re:Too bad India has no spine against... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    The existence of the Indian market for cellphone companies to market to is a boon to frugal cellphone customers here in the US. The Galaxy J3 and J7 are hella-good budget handsets targeted to the India market, but they're darn fine for cheapskates like me in the US. I recently upgraded from a J3 to a J7. The J7 is an awesome piece of gear for $150 when you can find one for that price. The J3 is a lot of goodness for just $60 these days. It's kinda the iPhone SE for the frugal.

  28. Re: Nationalism fad spreading by dj245 · · Score: 2

    8 out of 10 dentists agree that they are glad they weren't the other two dentists.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  29. Re: Nationalism fad spreading by orlanz · · Score: 1

    Ok, we need to stop elevating Yoda's inability to speak proper English.

    The truth is, he was good at a lot of things and studied all the time. But during HomeEco and English, he slept. The teachers thought he was "meditating" and "becoming one with the force". He was sleeping!

  30. Re:IBM in still in China by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    Does that mean India treats foreign companies worse than China does?

    Yes. China requires big foreign businesses to have a local "partner" (and there are ways to weasel out of that, say, by creating a local shell company run by someone you trust), but after that, China is mostly free-wheeling capitalism. There is little bureaucracy, taxes are low, and if you need a favor, the guanxi network makes it clear who you need to bribe. Utilities are rock-solid reliable, cheap, and can be turned on within an hour of your application. Real estate is easy to lease, and building permits are generally approved quickly.

    India is far more bureaucratic, you can wait for years for a license, only to find out that you need yet another license. Bribery is less formalized, so a bribe often just begets demands for more. The market is also much more fragmented, with Hindi in the north, Tamil in the south, Bengali in the east, Gujarati in the west, and a dozen more. One good thing that Mao did for China, was force everyone to learn a single standardized language.

    GDP per capita in China is 4 times that of India. There are good reasons for that. The Indians need to fix their government.

  31. Re: Nationalism fad spreading by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    Ok, we need to stop elevating Yoda's inability to speak proper English.

    He speaks English vocabulary with Japanese grammar.

    Japanese grammar makes sense to me because I grew up using an RPN calculator.

  32. Re:India, land of corpses and feces and open sewer by kenh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    India, a nation of street shitters [planetcustodian.com].

    Kinda like San Francisco is becoming?

    --
    Ken
  33. start by allowing Indian American to return by elcor · · Score: 1

    I mean Indian is one of the few countries in the world that doesn't allow double citizenship... how are they going to being back all the brains that left to work for these American companies? Certainly not with these big empty words.

  34. Re: Nationalism fad spreading by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    [Yoda] speaks English vocabulary with Japanese grammar.

    I thought it was Yoddish.

  35. Re: Nationalism fad spreading by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    C'mon, you know the old joke. Press conference in the war room:

    Speaker: We're gonna kill 100,000 Iraqi and two dentists.
    Journalist: Question: Why the two dentists?
    Speaker (to aide): See? Told you nobody's gonna ask about the Iraqi.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  36. Reeks of propoganda by shrivallabhd · · Score: 1

    There has been no move by the Indian government to levy protectionist policies against Internet giants. What the government is trying to do is push the SaaS companies to host the data out of the Indian territory, something most of the western governments are already doing as part of regulations to some extent or the other. It is a matter of security (There is the other extreme of over policing that we have to worry about). But it does not put the multinationals at any disadvantage as all the companies have to bear the same cost of hosting the data infrastructure within the country. This manipulative agenda is nothing but a cowardly attempt at building pressure on Indian agencies to withdraw and playing the protectionist card.

  37. Re: Nationalism fad spreading by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    if there's one thing Slashdot never knew it needed was a...Yoda-grammar pedant.

    But on Slashdot you pretty much expect at least one. Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Sheldons.

  38. Web is Bloated [Re:Silly Indians...] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Are you certain that your "tech sites" could function without the H1-Bs?

    At first, not. But if cuts are forced, companies would have to remove some of the bloated and excessive layers of CSS and JS libraries to make their sites maintainable with less staff.

    There's a lot of fat that can be trimmed. Craigslist runs just fine, and fast, without eye-candy and UI toys. If the H1-B's were cut back, the PHB's would just have to learn to say "no" to me-to gimmicks. (Craigslist is perhaps an extreme case, but something half-way between is possible.)

    1. Re:Web is Bloated [Re:Silly Indians...] by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      At first, not. But if cuts are forced, companies would have to remove some of the bloated and excessive layers of CSS and JS libraries to make their sites maintainable with less staff.

      I have to say, blaming H1-B workers for the excessive layers of CSS and Javascript is a novel viewpoint.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Web is Bloated [Re:Silly Indians...] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      blaming H1-B workers for the excessive layers

      I did not blame H1-B's. If anything, I blamed PHB's. Although, I'll admit I was ambiguous on that point.

      But it is generally true that the cheaper the labor, the more features and "extras" you ask for. For example, say you have $40 a week to spend on gardening for your house. Let's say your first gardener charges $10 an hour. You calculate you can have 8 different kinds of flowers in your yard at that price.

      If, however, the $10/hr gardener goes away, and the next cheapest gardener is $20/hr, you may have to cut back to say 4 different kinds of flowers.

      Books are judged by their covers for the most part; it's human nature. I don't know an easy way around it. If more "minimalist" sites start out-competing the eye-candy sites in the market, then things could change. Craigslist is quite successful, but they are not really growing. They are kind of equivalent to a successful mom-and-pop store: perhaps profitable, but not seeking expansion.