Slashdot Mirror


Germany, Seeking Independence From US, Pushes Cyber Security Research (reuters.com)

Germany announced a new agency earlier this week to fund research on cyber security and to end its reliance on digital technologies from the United States, China and other countries. From a report: Interior Minister Horst Seehofer told reporters that Germany needed new tools to become a top player in cyber security and shore up European security and independence. "It is our joint goal for Germany to take a leading role in cyber security on an international level," Seehofer told a news conference with Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen. "We have to acknowledge we're lagging behind, and when one is lagging, one needs completely new approaches."

71 of 160 comments (clear)

  1. "Cyber security" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So cringy.

    1. Re:"Cyber security" by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's Seehofer. Germany's version of a deep-south republican senator.

      To be honest, we're happy he can talk in a way that conveys what he means. When I think of the infamous "Transrapid" speech of his predecessor... Even as a German native speaker you were left wondering what the fuck he was talking about.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:"Cyber security" by gweihir · · Score: 2

      To be fair, this basically just makes the stupid easier to see.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:"Cyber security" by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You didn't hear about "Bavaria One", I get it? Same party, different goofball.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:"Cyber security" by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Well, Bavaria is basically the insane asylum of Germany (to quote Otto), so nothing surprises me there. I only follow German politics casually these days, although I used to live there.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:"Cyber security" by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I'll take happy, drunk Bavarians over goose stepping Prussians with sticks up their asses.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:"Cyber security" by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the Bavarians have both. While technically there is no historic overlap between Bavaria and Prussia, the mind-set is quite present there.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:"Cyber security" by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Are those the ones that get pissed off and start swearing because the bus was 30 seconds late?

      All they're missing is a toothbrush moustache.

    8. Re:"Cyber security" by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Public transportation worldwide plans in 1 minute intervals or worse. The only exception I know is Zurich, were it is 30 seconds.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    9. Re:"Cyber security" by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Or with the words of another comedian "The CSU wants to kick everyone out that can't speak proper German? Fuck, where are all the Bavarians gonna go? And what about the CSU, there's asylum for war refugees but what country grants asylum to people fleeing from intelligence?"

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re: "Cyber security" by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No hatred for cultures that belong into Petri dishes because they make you nauseated is right. No matter the color the culture might have.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. Maybe Germany should start with its legislation. by Sique · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Germany outlawed the ownership of "hacking tools" (202c StGB, "Acts preparatory to data espionage and phishing") , and all of a sudden, Internet security research in Germany is lagging.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  3. They could hire the Israelis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm serious: the Israeli security forces, both physical and cybersecurity, are extremely effective for the same reason that penguins survive cold: Darwin forces their evolution. Now, Germany relying on Jewish security forces would be a wonderful irony.

    1. Re:They could hire the Israelis by Sique · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why the Subjunctive? Checkpoint Firewall for instance is widely deployed in Germany and is made in Israel.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:They could hire the Israelis by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well... what would rather come to my mind is that "in the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed is king"...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:They could hire the Israelis by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Similar to Germany's problems with Russia. Differences over how much Germany has to pay for the gas.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  4. 70% of the budget by grungeman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    will be spent on GDPR compliance. The remaining budget will be spent on foreign consultants, because using "hacking tools" is a crime in Germany, so no one knows how to use them.

    --

    Signature deleted by lameness filter.
    1. Re:70% of the budget by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that GDPR bullshit really cut into our bottom line.

      ---signed, foreign security company.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:70% of the budget by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      70% of the budget will be spent on GDPR compliance.

      No it won't. It's pretty easy to be compliant. Basically ask yourself:

      Are you being an asshat with your users' data?

      If the answer is "hell no" you're in the clear. If it's "yes but" then you are not compliant.

      The essence is actually easy. Don't keep stuff you don't need to keep. And delete stuff when users tell you to delete it. Everything else follows from that easily (e.g. requests for data). 99.9% of the complaints are from people who can't be arsed to actually treat the data with the respect it deserves or squirrels who don't want to give any of it up in case they can "monetize" it.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:70% of the budget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can claim that all you want, but the reality is very different. My company left the EU over this laws passage. We're not doing anything malicious with our data on our customers. However there are serious costs to compliance. Not every business has a staff of lawyers available to review the law even if compliance were simple. Which I'd argue it's not for a small business. The reality is this wasn't the only terrible law in the EU and a lot of small businesses aren't compliant now. People like you say "just don't do anything malicious" as if that makes you compliant. It does not. There are other things you have to do like research the law and investigate what your own systems and you have to hire someone to come in to do that and you have to hire a lawyer to explain the law and all sorts of other bullshit because what you understand the law to mean is not what a lawyer will tell you the law means.

    4. Re:70% of the budget by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      In this case at a guess, 100% of the budget will be spent on figuring out what they need to do, what the problems are and what possible solutions could be.

      That they are looking for solutions no other government controls would point to FOSS and so you can expect a major resurgence of FOSS in the EU. The EU absolutely does no trust US government security letters no US corporations, any more. I reckon they have figured out the US corporations they were paying, were back dooring everything they were buying.

      This organisation will likely be very bad for US software companies, well your profits just got fucked by the CIA and NSA, had to play games and now the results. Reality, of the three, USA, China and Russia, you should probably trust the USA by far the least (the cheat on public in your face treaties and have done so for centuries, their word is shit and has been for centuries, why would anyone in the right mind trust anything the US government has to say or puts in writing or publicly gives oath to in any or every house of their government, congress or senate, all empty bullshit).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:70% of the budget by Xarius · · Score: 1

      Most of the western EU countries are already 90% of the way to GDPR compliance with their existing Data Protection legislation.

      GDPR will cost large corporations money for failing to comply, again they should be mostly compliant anyway thanks to existing legislation. GDPR just harmonises it all and gives powers back to individuals.

      --
      C17H21NO4
  5. Not surprising... by ph1ll · · Score: 5, Interesting
    --
    --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
    1. Re:Not surprising... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes, and Germany apologized long and deeply for the chancellor boring the CIA out of their mind, could we already let it rest?

      Then again, why did they have to wiretap her, to know this all you really had to do is to listen to one of her speeches...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Not surprising... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ... after Obama wiretapped the German leader's 'phone.

      Well, let's not forget that Merkel and co are not overwhelmed by Trump either and see him as a threat to global peace.

      That's two presidents in a row that Germany has had legitimate grievances with, and they came from either side of the political spectrum. It is perfectly understandable why Germany might not see the US as a very reliable ally.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:Not surprising... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Yeah, flooding Europe with Muslims and Africans it a great peace-project whereas the US not waging war everywhere all the time is a huge problem ..

      Are you trying to make an actual point- or just looking for an excuse for a racist diatribe? I don't see any relevance to your comment to the discussion?

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    4. Re:Not surprising... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Do you rip your "allies" off in trade? Germany is a security free-rider that exploits American generosity to run a massive trade surplus. For a country flush with cash and a large budget surplus, it should be able to spend 2 percent of gross domestic product on defense. NATO is a *mutual* defense alliance, do you refuse to carry your share of the burden? To have a military alliance, you must have a military. Germany doesn't really have one. Moreover Germany has a horribly hypocritical stance towards Russia.

      What's Merkel doing about the situation in Africa? She's been world leader for over a year and things are just as bad as ever. What's Merkel doing about the oppression of Uighurs in China? Those are world leader jobs.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:Not surprising... by nnet · · Score: 1

      What's Merkel doing about human rights abuses of Americans IN America?

    6. Re:Not surprising... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The Sunni/Shia war is about 1300 years old. It's _not_ a terrible outcome.

      'Divide your enemy and set them to war with each other.' You can't claim it doesn't work.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Not surprising... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      All it took to destabilize the mideast was killing the dictator that was keeping a lid on the 1300 year old war. At this point, they will be at war with each other until their oil is worth less than the extraction cost. Yeah!

      No amount of government spending would have done anything, it's almost all wasted on rent seekers.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:Not surprising... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The Sunnis and Shia went straight to war in Iraq.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re:Not surprising... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      We do know who's funding it, duh.

      Saddam was keeping the Shia from mouthing off in Iraq. Now they are back at it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  6. Will be pathetic by gweihir · · Score: 1

    All German federal activities in the Internet so far have been uninformed, counter-productive, very late and generally of negative utility. This one will be the same.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  7. Re:Maybe Germany should start with its legislation by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Stupidity is the name of the game in Germany when the government collides with the Internet.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  8. Re:"When one is lagging, one needs new approaches" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Given the raise of insular behaviour among the big countries recently, and considering that the same trends have been reacted to already in the HPC area, with the idea of an European HPC chips, the independence in all things economically and militarily necessary is increasingly prudent. If the big countries are gunning for a conflict among themselves, EU area might not want to be left in an increasingly impossible situation as the trading stops and missiles start flying.

    There is still a long way to an emergency socialization of the strategic companies and technologies, and the mass employment to build, say, a Europe wide quantum information network.

  9. Silly Vassel State by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

    Europeans can hee and haw all they want about how things are different and oh so better in their countries. At the end of the day when America says jump, European politicians always ask how high.

    Besides, that welfare state won't look so good when Germany has to start paying for its own self defense instead of relying on foreign powers.

    1. Re:Silly Vassel State by owlaf · · Score: 1

      They were fine heeing and hawing to their public, then jumping for 'merica when asked. Now with all the fight picking Trump has done, they will put real effort into becoming independent from 'merica. China isn't just laughing, they are salivating. If Trump thinks google is biased, wait for the censorship China deploys on their internet to become global under One Belt One Road

    2. Re:Silly Vassel State by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Just wait until sovereign nations 'realize' that national debt to China can be defaulted on, just like any other. Agreements to arbitrate in Chinese courts hold no weight.

      The Chinese government will have kittens.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Silly Vassel State by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      How dare you use facts. The USA only excelled in Needlessly spending so much on the military Putting people in prison School shootings Everything else , you know the important stuff the USA is rarely in the top 10 Capitalism, democracy, education, health outcomes, social mobility, etc etc etc etc

    4. Re:Silly Vassel State by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Not a lot of Americans know much about the Road and Belt initiative, which is kind of frightening.

  10. Re:You an North Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Have you never heard of SAP? Have you never heard of the CryEngine? Groups like the Chaos Computer Club?
    Anyway, if they want cyber security for Europe they do have some larger players that could do some contract work.
    AVAST and Avira are German companies. ESET is Slovakian company. Bitdefender is Romanian. F-Secure is Finnish. AVG is a Czech company. Of course since a government agency is responsible for this, it will most likely still not work as well as it could.

  11. Re:You an North Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Germany doesn't have the intellectual base in computing? It's like you've been raised on American "news" channels, son.

    It's always fun to see an American bragging about "American innovation". Have you ever looked at research papers from the large American universities? You may notice that overwhelmingly, the authors are foreign guest researchers. Do you know just how much of America's technology sector is carried by first generation immigrants, both naturalized citizens and H1B visa holders?

    The reality is that your country's tech sector and "innovation" is the work of foreigners, and among them Germany is well represented, and when it comes to "intellectual base in computing", no country is farther behind for its socioeconomic size and population than America.

    Your popular culture and educational institutes is literally shitting out nothing but ignorant twats. You USED to be a smart people, but now you're dumbed down by TV, gossip and eating, and foreigners have to carry you.

  12. Re:Independence Day by hey! · · Score: 1

    It's not the yanks they're worried about. It's the Russia, and Russia's proxies.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  13. Re:Independence Day by houghi · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is not OR/OR it is AND/AND.

    The US has hacked Germany (and other allies) before. It is like fucking your best mates wife. There are things you should not do, even if it is legal. And if you do, you must not be upset if suddenly he does not trust you anymore and does not want to be your best mate anymore.

    So why SHOULD Germany trust the USofA? The USofA does not trust its allies (and I am not even asking that they should.), so what is good for the goose is good for the other black pot.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  14. Re:"When one is lagging, one needs new approaches" by stealth_finger · · Score: 2

    The German economy was lagging behind in the 30s and history shows how well the "completely new approach" worked.

    Hmmmm, I wonder what earlier event could have been responsible for that. And the "completely new approach" wasn't new at all and is basically the exact one Trump is using to great effect right now.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  15. Re: "When one is lagging, one needs new approaches by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    We are talking about Germans taking "completely new approaches" do recover about whatever they are lagging behind

    Someone needs to tell those Merkeled Krauts that testicles are harder to replace than that...

  16. Re:Maybe Germany should start with its legislation by gweihir · · Score: 1

    As that is not happening, it is also not a problem. There are just some Nazis (yes, AfD has now openly collaborated with Nazis) that what to panic the population to profit from it.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  17. Re: "When one is lagging, one needs new approaches by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Worked fine until the US and communism fucked it up like usual.

  18. Re: "When one is lagging, one needs new approaches by aliquis · · Score: 1

    So the solution will be death camps in silicon valley?
    That's how you think history works?

  19. Re:Maybe Germany should start with its legislation by gweihir · · Score: 1

    And she is an actual scientist (PhD in Physics). How pathetic is that.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  20. Re:Independence Day by hey! · · Score: 1

    Well, this is different from normal distrust. If you think allies aren't spying on you, you're naive. But that's different from not *trusting* your allies.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  21. Re:"When one is lagging, one needs new approaches" by postbigbang · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Face it, the US cyber intelligence community (an oxymoron) is in total disarray. Its weapons have been exposed and re-weaponized for organized crime, it can't keep a cybersecurity "czar" in office, and it has a half-dozen competing agencies snooping and sniffing and still are unable to be of much use when an actual disaster happens.

    Were I a German policy maker, I'd say: cut the meager tether and spend the money to protect myself and EU interests. I'm not sure the US is going to do that much longer, and in many areas, has already stopped cold.

    And I'm sincerely hoping that the missiles don't fly.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  22. Re:"When one is lagging, one needs new approaches" by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Germany has privacy protections for its citizens. Just like all the other 'eyes', they need other nations to spy on their people for them (and of course vice versa).

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  23. Re:"When one is lagging, one needs new approaches" by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    In reality, it's a mess. As stated, were I them, I'd cover my own butt. The US hasn't exactly built a mound of trust recently. They attack as much as they're attacked. I see router walls forming in the not distant future. Do you have a data passport? Ok. The mail was sent, the website accessed, the Salesforce query done.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  24. Re:"When one is lagging, one needs new approaches" by gtall · · Score: 1

    Mr. President, there's this guy on Slashdot who has exposed our weakness in cyber. He knows a lot, we don't know how he got the information...although he could be talking out of his ass.

    Mr. P.: Hey, don't knock talking out of your ass. I'm very smart, you know.

  25. Re:Independence Day by gtall · · Score: 1

    There's nothing wrong with hacking your friends and allies for information. It keep everyone honest...the alternative is going on jingoistic crusades against imagined hobgoblins....err...now if we could only keep those nasty hobgoblins off Fox.

  26. Re:You an North Korea by gtall · · Score: 1

    More to the point, the Democrats have been demonizing the science and technology since the 1960's. Starting with Reagan, the Republicans saw they were being outflanked and decided they could be even dumber. Now both sides are racing towards a new Dark Ages.

  27. In a further statement, the minister said "we will be importing vast numbers of people with completely different worldviews to work on this security initiative. What could possibly go wrong?"

  28. Complete Independence by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    Great! The Germans secure their own physical boarders as well. The 2017 US expenditures increased to $43B on Germany alon3:
    https://tradingeconomics.com/g...
    If they want independence from the US, they can flip the entire bill for their country. I'm sure we can find some roads, bridges or schools that need some investment here in the US with that 43 billion dollar windfall.

    1. Re:Complete Independence by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      When the US spends $43B on it's military in Germany, the bulk amount of that money goes to US suppliers of said military, plus wages to the US soldiers. Some of that money makes it's way into the German economy, but a bunch of it stays with US companies and citizens.

  29. Using Windows, they cannot be independent by ffkom · · Score: 1

    It's so pathetic when German politicians of the same kind that just scrapped well deployed Linux installations for government use in exchange for the US-Trojan "Windows" speak of "cyber security". No government is really free while it still depends on proprietary software controlled by software from a country far away.

  30. Cybersecurity by beep54 · · Score: 1

    Why any country with the capability to develop its own system would rely on other countries to do it for them has always been a mystery to me. It makes the 'security' part of the term meaningless.

  31. Re:"When one is lagging, one needs new approaches" by postbigbang · · Score: 2

    You lump many conservative arguments into your reply, too many to disambiguate within the confines of /.

    The reshuffling is both random, and pushing nations towards covering their own butts. Allies? Nope. Common cause? Nope. Humanitarian needs? Nope. The US can't even prevent post-disaster holocausts on their own soil.

    Were it I, I wouldn't trust my data on foreign soil, but then, I don't even trust my next-door neighbor with my data. A government? The US or Germany? No.

    I don't blame Germany, even if their own surveillance mechanisms have access to it. But encrypt on the wire, and in place. Anyone with sufficient interest knows who I am; slashdot is not immune from the NSA, and a myriad of intelligence services that kiss but don't tell... except each other.

    What good is the sovereignty of a nation? Not so much these days. NAFTA changes will be bent and broken and reformed. History as a guide, the businesses fund the campaign contributions that make public policy, and when the contributions change their shape, so will the government.

    Somewhere in the middle are methods to help starving countries, refugees, and the other trash of corporate welfare. The attempt to sequester data is Pyrrhic at best, and Quixote-ish when it's revealed that it was all for the votes and little else.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  32. Re:"When one is lagging, one needs new approaches" by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    Exactly the same approach?

    You have a failed understanding of history and current affairs.

    You're perfect. Have any of the major news organizations asked you to apply to work for them?

  33. Re:You an North Korea by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    The original European settlers were settlers, not immigrants. They did not inject themselves into an established country as immigrants. They bootstrapped the whole thing themselves, with encouragement from enlightened Europeans, especially the French.

  34. Re:Oh lord by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    Welcome to Slashdot. Don't let it worry you much. The denizens of Slashdot are in no way shape or form typical Americans.

  35. Re:Maybe Germany should start with its legislation by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    You don't want to gamble with your life like that. I was trained by NSA at the University. Yet in the field they passed crazy crap laws and I didn't want any parts of that so I bailed out. Administration doesn't matter by the way. Both sides do dumb things in this area.

    A lot of times in most countries encryption falls under the same laws that regulate arms. As in it would be like you selling say a box of grenades, rockets or guns to some other country. Gets crazy. I remember back in the 1980s they fined digital a bunch of money because one of their Vax 11/785 machines ended up in east Germany somehow. They vetted the buyer, did all due diligence, didn't matter.

  36. Re:"When one is lagging, one needs new approaches" by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Your intelligence agencies are prevented by charter from snooping on domestic servers, not that it really stops them.

    But the 80 year old end run is '3 eyes' (now 15 eyes, or so). They spy on each other's citizens, abracadabra, nobody has constitutional privacy protections.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  37. Re:Maybe Germany should start with its legislation by Sique · · Score: 1

    It was quite important, as former East Germany tried to clone the VAX architecture. By 1988/89, they had a VAX compatible 32 bit processor and one 1 Mbit RAM chip ready to create VAX clones (and there was much propaganda about how East Germany managed to close the gap to the U.S.).

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  38. Re:Maybe Germany should start with its legislation by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Really? I thought it was all about nuclear simulations. Seems like they could have used other easily available stuff instead. Like 88000, 68000 that SUN sold back in those days. I remember selling a whole bunch of machines to a guy in Northern Virginia that had a case of transputers, network cards, etc.

    I just couldn't imagine after digital did everything they could to make sure it was being sold to the right people were screwed in the end.

  39. Re:Maybe Germany should start with its legislation by Sique · · Score: 1

    Yes, there was the Robotron K 18xx series of mini computers from East Germany with the U80700 processor family of MicroVAX 78032 clones. The K 1840 was clone of the VAX 11/780, the K 1845 was supposed to be a VAX 11/785 replacement (but never came out of the prototype state), and the K 1820 was a MicroVAX II clone.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*