Slashdot Mirror


Free Municipal Wi-Fi May Be the Next Front In the War Against Privacy (theintercept.com)

TuballoyThunder writes: According to The Intercept, it appears that the LinkNYC free Wi-Fi might be designed to track users. This and other concerns were raised during a 2015 discussion on Slashdot. While many people are comfortable in trading their privacy for ostensibly free services, it is disheartening when municipalities collaborate with business to make it happen. "In May of this year, Charles Meyers, an undergraduate at New York City College of Technology, came across folders in LinkNYC's public library on GitHub, a platform for managing files and software, that appear to raise further questions about location tracking and the platform's protection of its users' data," reports The Intercept. "Meyers made copies of the codebases in question -- 'LinkNYC Mobile Observation' and 'RxLocation' -- and shared both folders with The Intercept."

Meyers says the "LinkNYC Mobile Observation" code collects the user's longitude and latitude, browser type, OS, device type, device identifiers, and full URL clickstreams (including data and time) and "aggregates this information into a database," the report says. Meyer's believes the company is interested in tracking the location of Wi-Fi users in real time. "If such code were run on a mobile app or kiosk, he said, the company would be able to make advertisements available in real time based on where and who someone was, and that this would constitute a potential violation of the company's privacy policy," reports The Intercept.

Following the revelations, LinkNYC said the code was never intended to be released and was part of a longer-term R&D process. "In this instance, David Mitchell, Intersection's CTO, told the Intercept in an email. "Intersection was prototyping and testing some ideas internally, using employee data only, and mistakenly made source code public on Github. This code is not in use on the LinkNYC network." [Intersection is the "key player" in CityBridge, "a chameleon-like consortium of private companies" that New York City contracted to turn the city's payphone booth network into Wi-Fi-enabled kiosks.]

76 comments

  1. by who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the question has never been if your privacy is invaded. the question is only who do you prefer to invade your privacy

    1. Re: by who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What war? Privacy has been lost a long time ago

      And no you do not even get to select who is spying up your a hole any longer

    2. Re: by who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If leftist, authoritarian New York City has anything to do with it there will be no privacy and there will be constant surveillance. Of course their kindred spirits in corrupt tech companies will gladly help them too.

    3. Re:by who by commodore64_love · · Score: 2

      I'd prefer a private entity like Google or Apple, than a government entity that has police & soldiers & jails to make your life miserable.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  2. Is vs. could be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This code is not in use on the LinkNYC network.

    But, in the future, it could be, or, even in the present, similar code could be. There is no free lunch. Everything, in the domain of things regarding which private information has value, is offered as a trade-off between convenience and privacy. That equation means that privacy is the inverse of convenience. That has ramifications far beyond free wifi. Encrypt everything.

  3. They can track me all they want... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    ... I'll bore the tits off 'em.

    1. Re:They can track me all they want... by Spamalope · · Score: 2

      and when they need a scapegoat they'll pick one from the list of suckers in the area at the time...

    2. Re: They can track me all they want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you REALLY feel that's it's a-okay for your every movement, every time you take a shit, to be tracked by the Stasi plus every two-bit marketing hustler in town?

      If so, my brother, you are a pathetic excuse for a man.

      And if not - then stop making lame apologies for the surveillance state.

    3. Re: They can track me all they want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misunderstand. It's not that we're ok with it. It's simply that there is nothing we can do about it.

    4. Re: They can track me all they want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, they can see that all I do is connecting to a VPN server. I'll be getting ads for VPN services then?

    5. Re:They can track me all they want... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Boobies, birds, or both? :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    6. Re: They can track me all they want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably, not to mention that almost every consumer VPN has been compromised, so they can still see your information.

  4. New York is alright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IF YOU LIKE SAXOPHONE

    1. Re:New York is alright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like tenor, but not alto. Which NYC neighborhoods are best for me?

  5. Yeah I think I played that computer game... by Noishkel · · Score: 1

    Wasn't it called Watch_Dogs? The entire city it was set in (Chicago, I think) was all connected by a giant city owned Wi-Fi network that everyone connected to.

    Well being that was only a computer game I'm sure there's no way that it could ever be abused by an authoritarian city government... like one that already has a pretty piss poor track record of respecting people's rights. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  6. Sign now, pay later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Research project . . . yeah right.

    Get people to sign conditions of use now - then change the underlying infrastructure to abuse the users who have already signed. They already agreed right.

    If people even read facebooks terms before Cambridge Analytica, they probably never envisaged the data being used that way. Even fully informed they would have signed, because they could not imagine the future abuses.

    They got caught this time - so this might not progress, not in it's current form.

    Privacy should not be about complying with the letter of the law, but the intent. Present the issue before a jury of ordinary people - and if they think the behavior was unreasonable - then big fines.

    1. Re:Sign now, pay later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A right to privacy is a niche human concept. Nature does not have any use for this and does not require it. You have no privacy except for that which you are able to carve out for yourself - do not expect others to do it for you or respect yours.

    2. Re:Sign now, pay later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A right to privacy is a niche human concept.

      No it isn't.

      e.g.: Cats are happy to dump their latest kill on your door mat for your approval, but when they die they almost always go into hiding to die in private.

    3. Re: Sign now, pay later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Panda bears are well known for living in a panoptic surveillance state with fully automated tyranny systems.

    4. Re:Sign now, pay later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      A right to privacy is a niche human concept. Nature does not have any use for this and does not require it. You have no privacy except for that which you are able to carve out for yourself - do not expect others to do it for you or respect yours.

      Nature has plenty of privacy - look for all the animals hiding from predators, for example. Surveillance, or for that matter corporations, are niche human concepts. Concepts that nature doesn't have and doesn't need. Privacy can be had through legislation. Pick your country according to taste, or at least the right politicians.

    5. Re:Sign now, pay later. by mikael · · Score: 2

      Prairie dogs maintain lookouts and give out warning calls if they see a predator. Some birds of prey will hover above a field for hours in order to catch a rabbit, rat or other critter.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    6. Re:Sign now, pay later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. If we were living by the strict laws of Nature then, if we felt they were a threat, we would simply kill those we feel are invading our privacy. It's called defending your territory and it's part of every natural organisms mode of existence.

  7. "War against privacy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Straight to extremes. No wonder people are in a frenzy over everything. Permanent outrage, one of the cornerstones of any successful civilization.

    1. Re:"War against privacy" by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I wish they'd declare war on privacy. Considering how effective the other wars on... were, from drugs to terrorism, it would essentially mean we get more privacy.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:"War against privacy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give it time. There will be pirate internet (like pirate radio) and abilities to illegally obfuscate any privacy intrusions from even those who believe have a right to (government). Is it good? Probably not. It is dystopian as hell in my opinion and the first ep of Black Mirror is a pretty good depiction on how things will go. But that is the price we pay for knowledge and interconnectivity.

  8. Anyone want to do the work by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    to figure out which ISP funded this story? And I'd much rather have my info in the hands of my democratically elected government than a mega corporation that I have zero say in unless I'm a top shareholder.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Anyone want to do the work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your government is much more dangerous than any corporate entity. The government is what enables corporate entities to do bad shit like throw you in jail for copy"right" infringement or steal your money.

    2. Re:Anyone want to do the work by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      With the difference that in a working democracy, you could actually get rid of the government and install a new one. You'd have to get a working democracy first, granted, but that's at least an option you don't have with corporations.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Anyone want to do the work by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      to figure out which ISP funded this story? And I'd much rather have my info in the hands of my democratically elected government than a mega corporation that I have zero say in unless I'm a top shareholder.

      Not at all! Government abuse of data is a whole lot more rampant than the private sector. If you believe a "democratically elected government" is safer with your info then I have a bridge to sell you.

    4. Re:Anyone want to do the work by commodore64_love · · Score: 2

      > I'd much rather have my info in the hands [Donald Trump] than a mega corporation

      Fixed that for you. I figure that will change your mind of who you trust. BTW the Russian government is ALSO "democratically elected" so I could have substituted "Vladimir Putin" in there instead. Or possibly the EU president "Jean-Claude Juncker"

      I wouldn't trust any of these three with my data, especially since they command massive armies to arrest you at will. (Reference: the prison camps that President Roosevelt created to hold undesirable citizens.)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  9. "oops. we got caught" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "we aren't using THAT code for our service. our 'r&d' came up with something even 'better' and more 'effective', and we're using that instead. and no, you can't have that code."

  10. Canihaz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Captive portal evasion with a vpn?

  11. Commercial ISPs track you too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Believe it.

    1. Re:Commercial ISPs track you too by Bruinwar · · Score: 1

      Believe it.

      Comcrap, AT&T, Verizon & all the rest are scooping up everything. All of it.

      --
      SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT
  12. You do know that in the absence of "gov't" by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    those corporate entities won't just stay home eating cookies. They'll form power structures of their own that are just like governments but without all that pesky "democracy" stuff to get in the way of profits and whatever little project strikes the CEO's fancy (Jeff Bezos is spending his $260 million/day on space travel, which would be peachy if I wasn't paying tax dollars to feed his underpaid/overworked staff)

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:You do know that in the absence of "gov't" by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      those corporate entities won't just stay home eating cookies. They'll form power structures of their own that are just like governments but without all that pesky "democracy" stuff to get in the way of profits and whatever little project strikes the CEO's fancy (Jeff Bezos is spending his $260 million/day on space travel, which would be peachy if I wasn't paying tax dollars to feed his underpaid/overworked staff)

      Well, maybe Anarcho-Communism would be a whole lot better!

    2. Re:You do know that in the absence of "gov't" by commodore64_love · · Score: 3

      > corporations will form power structures of their own that are just like governments but without all that pesky "democracy" stuff

      And I thought I was cynical :-o During the last 100 years (approximately 1910 to 2010) governments have killed over 100 million of their OWN citizens. Not foreign citizens but their own people. 100,000,000+ acts of genocide.

      - How many citizens have corporations deliberately killed with gas chambers, firing squads, mass extermination? 10? 20? So essentially zero compared to 100,000,000.

      I fear government more than corporations, and history backs me up. BTW you say corps are not democratic, but they have to answer to their customers (the voters). Your Dollars are your votes, and you vote for corporations you like when you buy a product. And do not vote for corporations you dislike, like Cheatwagen.

      - Note: I listed Volkswagen because I voted for them in 2012 by buying a new Diesel Beetle, and then I learned they LIED to me and committed a CRIME against the government (both US and EU). So I am correcting my error and boycotting Volkswagen for the next 40 years, until the current generation of managers/engineers is no longer at the company.

      Our dollars and euros are our votes for/against corporations.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  13. NYC corruption at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you expect out of this leftist, third world, hell hole?

    NYC is really an icon of corruption, mismanagement, and failed ideologies.

  14. That war is over. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is no more "war on privacy".

    There WAS such a war, but it is over now. The privacy advocates lost. The teeming Facebook multitudes who use gmail, run every tracking javascript shoveled onto their machine, and cheerfully run calculator apps which scrape their address books and forward to IP's in China won.

    There is no more privacy. You lost. Sorry.

    1. Re:That war is over. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no more "war on privacy".

      There WAS such a war, but it is over now. The privacy advocates lost. The teeming Facebook multitudes who use gmail, run every tracking javascript shoveled onto their machine, and cheerfully run calculator apps which scrape their address books and forward to IP's in China won.

      There is no more privacy. You lost. Sorry.

      Exactly!

      Now its only a matter of HOW deep the plug can be inserted... But it WILL be inserted no matter what...

    2. Re:That war is over. by commodore64_love · · Score: 2

      Insightful.

      BTW pretty much all my data on facebook is lies. I was not born April Fools Day and I don't work for the Babylon5 Interstellar Alliance. I abandoned Gmail and switched to Outlook, and then I quit google search to use startpage.com instead. (Also my phone is NOT a google phone, so they can't follow me everywhere I go.)

      Not perfect, but it's a step in the right direction.... don't put all your data in the same basket. (Or something.)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  15. Use a random MAC address. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Use a random MAC address and create a script that passes a random email address to the captive authentication portal. LinkNYC doesn't check validity of email addresses used in their authentication portal, so you can use any random gibberish ending in a TLD. No valid account or info needed.

    1. Re:Use a random MAC address. by tummetott · · Score: 1

      how to use a random MAC address this on fedora: https://fedoramagazine.org/ran...

    2. Re:Use a random MAC address. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using obviously bogus random data is a bad idea if you're the only one doing it. Better idea: Log all MAC addresses you see, and give one from the area that's not currently present. Do something similar with email addresses. Use a sniffer, and log email addresses sent to the portal.

      Maybe even better yet: randomly impersonate someone else by using their MAC and email address. Except ... beware that someone analyzing the data will be able to spot the anomalies, and by mining all of the data they could find a pattern in the anomalies: you.

  16. Shock. LinkNYC == Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Intersection was formed by the acquisition of Control Group and Titan by a group of investors led by Sidewalk Labs. Sidewalk Labs is owned by... Alphabet. The CTO is Craig Nevill-Manning a former Google employee (and the CEO is Dan Doctoroff... a buddy of Michael Bloomberg who was in his administration and served as CEO of Bloomberg until Bloomberg took back the reigns).

    The whole thing is a Google project setup not to look like a Google project.

    1. Re: Shock. LinkNYC == Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big Brother Google is always watching.

  17. My business offers 100% free, shit-free wi-fi by DogDude · · Score: 1

    My business offers the public 100% free, untracked wi-fi. I think it's my moral obligation to offer a relatively untraceable public Internet connection.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  18. No shit Sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course free wifi networks have been set up to track you. Iâ(TM)ve seen it demoed.

  19. Whose Property is it Anyway by Kokobaby39 · · Score: 0

    Why not go to a WiFi spot and use their WiFi. Is the band wave yours to begin with? Is the "free WiFi" a MetroPCS? I saw the other day an ad for Spectrum Cell Usage. I heard though, that WiFi has to be an added cost within the Spectrum Call Lobby. Take this one: "I'm sorry sir, but your area does not cover WiFi." Try that in a house and you don't have service. The cell ads say it is the Nation's Largest Most Reliable Network. WTH?

  20. Shithole Cuntry Has No Privacy Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You couldn't pay me enough to move to that Orwellian nightmare of a cuntry. SAD.

  21. Prognostication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am usually loath to spout off about future trends. Basically because it's so easy to get one thing wrong which causes the whole to be shot down.

    But keep this in mind for the next decade or so, and when you see things turn out like this, remember you read it somewhere.

    I see like never before in my lifetime or the recent past a concerted effort to push the world in a certain direction it would not be going otherwise. I fear that the end result of this is to create a world population that is grey and identityless and is simply a good source of taxes and labor, similar to how a flock of sheep is a good source of wool, and can be moved, sold, bred, and culled at the whim of the owner.

    Tech being developed like ubiquitous surveillance, mammoth data centers, and application of AI, is starting to make the treating of the human population of Earth like large herds of chattel feasible.

    All the different trends you've been seeing developing since 9/11 play into it: muslims against the west, China vs USA, religion vs secularism, feminists against males, the absolutely vileness that political debate has stooped to in the US and Europe (and elsewhere), forced immigration to and assimilation in Europe, racial division like never before, economic trends, rise of supernational governing bodies and regional blocks, change of politics to become more autocratic, the erosion of private ownership, free speech, and privacy itself. The ironic twist is that most of us stand one one side or the other on at least one of these issues, feeling extremely righteous and virtuous about it, having no compunction even wishing for, or calling for the death of, opposing sides.

    Most will probably hail the new overlords that will put an end to this emerging chaos by application of autocratic force. But you or the next generation will probably be told what work to do and how much, what to be entertained by, where to live, what to wear, whom to breed with and how much, what language to speak, what to worship, when to die, etc. And take heart, it won't be that dystopic, most will even like it...

    1. Re:Prognostication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://xkcd.com/610/

  22. Actual code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a software engineer, I would very much like to review the actual code for myself, rather than just have to trust Meyers' word for it.
    Is it hosted anywhere for everybody to see?
    My understanding is that it's a library for Android app developers or an app that would need to be installed on the device.
    Is it being used in any app in the wild? Does it hold any actual value for somebody who would want to spy on people or is it just some intern's proof-of-concept toy project?

  23. should we believe them? by sad_ · · Score: 1

    should we take their word for it and believe them, there isn't really a way to find out.
    when in doubt, it's always better to presume the worst.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  24. VPN by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    Anyone that cares can use a VPN and probably should be using a VPN anyway. There are VPNs selling subscriptions for less than a dollar a month.

    Just get a VPN and move on.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:VPN by DaMattster · · Score: 4, Informative

      Anyone that cares can use a VPN and probably should be using a VPN anyway. There are VPNs selling subscriptions for less than a dollar a month.

      Just get a VPN and move on.

      I am starting to notice that at some public WiFi hotspots, the high port numbers are being blocked precisely to prevent things like this from happening. Of course they claim it is for the "safety" of the network but we know that's not the *real* reason.

    2. Re:VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Meyers says the "LinkNYC Mobile Observation" code collects the user's longitude and latitude, browser type, OS, device type, device identifiers, and full URL clickstreams (including data and time)"

      so the vpn might mask the urls and the browser type, but it really isnt going to stop the rest as that is typically tracked through the connection its self.

    3. Re:VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised that they don't have a way to track altitude as well. If you have a 50 story skyscraper you could easily have hundreds of people who resolve to the same latitude and longitude (for as well as those can be resolved). It could be quite useful to know what floor they are on, or at least to distinguish between floors to reasonable resolution.

    4. Re:VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LinkNYC are doing a free VPN !

    5. Re:VPN by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I would guess it's less about VPNs than about stopping people running bittorrent.

    6. Re:VPN by mea2214 · · Score: 1

      Exactly, which is why I block all those ports on my open wifi. The determined can still work around it but it deters the casual bittorrent user.

    7. Re: VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad that net neutrality would have stopped this kind of blocking. Too late now I guess.

    8. Re:VPN by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      They'll know which device connected at which time... where that device is... but they won't know what you're doing on it.

      The big problem with tracking everyone is that you don't want to track everyone. You want to track specific subsets of the population and classify those to create useful patterns.

      Absent that... the tracking isn't useful.

      What is more, theoretically, the identifiers could be altered in software. I'm fairly certain you can do it with a rooted phone already.

      But the real point is that the tech is there to do it if you want to do it.

      If you don't care, then you don't care.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    9. Re:VPN by Karmashock · · Score: 2

      That will just cause an arm's race between the Wifi's block list and the VPN's aggressiveness.

      The banning of VPNs in places like China and Russia is great for the industry because it will force people that need vpns to come up with tech that the Russians and chinese will neither stop nor even detect.

      And that can be applied generally there after.

      The tech is inherently uncontrollable. It is hubris on the part of the networks to think they can stop connections from occurring.

      But that's fine. I like their hubris. It means they'll make more mistakes.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  25. Never easier to fabricate a criminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As they say, with millions of laws to choose from, anyone can be made a criminal if need be. Today, it's easier than ever. Instead of following you around, waiting for you to fall into the trap, all they have to do is call up Spybook, Google, or your municipal ISP.

    This may never happen to you. But you can be damn sure it will happen to others.

  26. VPN might be a possibility by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    It might be possible to use a VPN like OpenVPN to thwart this tracking but I'll bet the LinkNYC folks that about people doing it and probably block high port numbers or some other shady shit.

  27. Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comcast's wifi tracks you too.

    Along with half the wifi points you use. Because why not? Data sells.

  28. MAC Spoofing? by sycodon · · Score: 1

    Is there no way to jack with the MAC address when connecting to WiFi?

    It may be embedded in the hardware somehow, but it has to go through software to connect to the wifi.

    THAT is a hack I'd pay money for...a new MAC address every time a phone connects to WiFi

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re: MAC Spoofing? by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 2

      There is an app for that, or supposedly you can do it manually, but I get access denied when I try, so despite what the article says you probably need a rooted phone. https://www.techpluto.com/how-...

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    2. Re:MAC Spoofing? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's really easy on a regular PC or laptop - remember that sending a MAC other than the one in the card is required for transparent bridging or for hosting virtual machines. On a phone, you'd need to root/jailbreak it.

  29. Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use a VPN and tunnel through the spying.

  30. LinkNYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On top of that each LinkNYC has multiple video cameras that are located front left and right of the keypad, now go fuck you self LinkNYC.

  31. I noticed something the other day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just Sunday afternoon, I took my children to a certain large Houston-area mall. I have T-Mobile and usually get fantastic LTE coverage everywhere. Got in the mall, took a video of my son dancing in one of the stores and went to send it to my wife. LTE slow, slow, slow. The mall makes great pains to let you know they have FREE Wi-Fi. This "free" wi-fi tracks the living daylights out of users, let's the mall know what stores you visited. They get your IMEI number, MAC address, you name it. Not to mention the insidious ads.

    I didn't connect, as I knew this already, but it's one reason I went with T-Mobile for the unlimited data. Needless to say, I don't connect to any AP unless it's my home AP. Not even at work. Being a former pen tester gone back to sysadmin, I'm well aware of how the game is played. I usually have Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc., disabled unless I'm home. I also pay for my own email that I control. Too much is at stake these days to not be cautious.

  32. If it is free..... by gbkersey · · Score: 1

    ....you are the product