Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Windows U-turn Removes Warning About Installing Chrome, Firefox (cnet.com)

Earlier last week, several users with a new Windows 10 build reported that they were seeing a warning when they attempted to install Chrome or Firefox browser. It turns out, Microsoft has listened to the complaints and is reversing course. CNET reports: A new "fast-ring" test version of Windows, Insider Preview Build 17760, no longer interrupts the installation of rival browsers, a CNET test shows. Earlier this week, an earlier test version of Windows would warn people who tried to install the Chrome, Firefox, Opera or Vivaldi web browsers, "You already have Microsoft Edge -- the safer, faster browser for Windows 10." The dialog box presented two options: "Open Microsoft Edge" -- the default -- and "Install anyway." The feature raised some hackles and brought back memories of Microsoft's strong-arm tactics promoting its old Internet Explorer browser in the first browser wars two decades ago. But Microsoft isn't alone in such tactics: Google promotes its Chrome browser as faster and safer to people who visit its own websites with other browsers.

100 comments

  1. That was expected after the bad press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Microsoft went too far with that tactic. Doing an advertisement like Google does is one thing, messing up with a installation is another.

    1. Re:That was expected after the bad press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think MS windows is burger king in this analogy of yours, just trying to sell it's own burgers? It ain't. MS is not allowed to limit windows software to their own products only.

    2. Re:That was expected after the bad press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google's method is not an advertisement. Not even close. They design it to look like a pop up warning when you visit the Google home page.

    3. Re:That was expected after the bad press by omnichad · · Score: 5, Funny

      They tried putting it on Bing, but nobody visits that site.

    4. Re:That was expected after the bad press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's Tel Aviv today?

    5. Re: That was expected after the bad press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure if they wanted to limit Windows to only running Microsoft products they could do that, look at Windows S, they are certainly 'allowed' to, it's their license. It may be a dumb idea but probably not illegal.

    6. Re:That was expected after the bad press by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 2

      "MS is not allowed to limit windows software to their own products only."

      And by virtue of the install anyway button, they are not.
      Horrible practice, but ultimately rather meaningless as they don't prevent installation.
      Other than the blatant pop-up, I don't see this as differing much from the difficulty of installing third party non-Apple approved apps on an iDevice...

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    7. Re:That was expected after the bad press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Standard procedure for Microsoft. Keep pushing until you hit too much turbulence, then roll back temporarily, wait a bit and try again.

      Repeat over and over with minor variations and good dollop of FUD to muddy the waters until your opponents are so exhausted they can barely remember what which way is up, then ram it on home and rinse, repeat for the next target.

    8. Re:That was expected after the bad press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am the Bing user, you insensitive clod!

    9. Re:That was expected after the bad press by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Ah, so you're the nobody!

    10. Re: That was expected after the bad press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting the mobile link instead of the desktop link to the article is worse than Hitler.

  2. Welp by war4peace · · Score: 1

    I am not surprised. The browser is the gateway to everything online, so it's only fitting that companies fight tooth and nail over customers.
    Is it moral? Debatable. Is it expected? I would say yes.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    1. Re:Welp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it how humans with ASD act? You bet.

    2. Re:Welp by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are we replying to questions with other questions? It looks like it.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re: Welp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waiting here for some ill-informed turd to lecture me again on how MS of 2018 is not the same as the MS of 1998. Being anti-competitive jack holes is in their DNA. Save me your whimpering about MS puttting some code on GitHub so they wouldn't be laughed out of the got-damn building for avoiding the open source universe. Same cat; same spots.

  3. That leaves just Google scaring users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Every time I visit the Google homepage with something other than Chrome I get a big prompt with a button to go and install a "more secure browser". Can we get Google to take this down next or does only Microsoft live by this standard?

    1. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      There's gotta be a plugin to remove that... If not, writing one should be easy, just change the browser tag to whatever Chrome uses when visiting a page belonging to google.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should I have to? They should stop this shit just like Microsoft has been pushed to do.

    3. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      You shouldn't have to. But if something bothered me that much, I'd start getting active instead of hoping that someone might one day do it for me.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by beep54 · · Score: 1

      There already IS a plugin for this. Just use Duck Duck Go or something other than google.

    5. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just went there on Firefox and I don't see it. Are you sure it doesn't already have a button or something to remove it?

    6. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I visit the Google homepage with something other than Chrome I get a big prompt with a button to go and install a "more secure browser". Can we get Google to take this down next or does only Microsoft live by this standard?

      Seems reasonable to me. Basically if one browser through independent credible tests is more secure then that browser can advertise that, as long as the results are recent.

      That being said, Microsoft as the one providing the core OS has slightly more of a controlling position in that it can pick and choose which products to promote or demote when you click on them. Google was only doing it when you visited their home page and such. You tend to expect corporation X to advertise its products on corporation X's home page.

    7. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't have to. But if something bothered me that much, I'd start getting active instead of hoping that someone might one day do it for me.

      Here's a better use of your developer time: Write a plugin to block all those annoying pop-over "Breaking News" banners on every goddamn news site. It's not breaking news if it's been on your site all day or sometimes several days. Or how about blocking all the "sign up for a better experience" or "give up your email for our newsletter" pop overs on every other site. I can browse with noscript, but it breaks 95% of all sites and I get tired of allowing scripts one by one hoping to make the site work again without getting all the shit at the same time. It's getting as bad as the old X-10 pop up days.

    8. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a huge difference between a banner ad or prompt when you visit Google's own page, and stopping you from running an installer to beg you to use a different browser.

      If Android blocked installation of non-Google software and came up with a scary prompt telling you Google's better, presenting you with a large "use google" button and a smaller button that's *grey* (looking like it's been disabled) to say no thanks, go with what I actually chose instead of Google's offering... then Google would be as bad as Microsoft was being.

      Microsoft didn't do this only when you visited the Bing homepage or Microsoft.com. They did this when you were trying to use OS's original built-in browser to choose to download and install an alternative. There's miles of difference here.

    9. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Every time I visit the Google homepage with something other than Chrome I get a big prompt with a button to go and install a "more secure browser". Can we get Google to take this down next or does only Microsoft live by this standard?

      That is a serious false-equivalence. If we're holding them to the same standard then Microsoft is free to promote Edge on a website that it owns. (assuming that you're even telling the truth about the Google homepage - I can't reproduce what you're reporting so I'll just have to take your word for it)

      Now, if having Chrome installed on your computer also added a routine to monitor for and interrupt attempts to install any competing browser then you might have a point about Google, but it still wouldn't excuse Microsoft.

    10. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      use other search engine... (I, personally, use https://duckduckgo.com/)

    11. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I expect a beta OS to get it's beta browser tested, not third party hippy shit from has-beens in Mountain View.

    12. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

      Every time I visit the Google homepage with something other than Chrome I get a big prompt with a button to go and install a "more secure browser".

      How do you manage that? I have just tried with Opera, Vivaldi and Firefox, and I just get the homepage - no prompts.

    13. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can. I'm also lamenting the fact that Google seems to be given so much more latitude to deceive its users, presumably because the product is free.

    14. Re: That leaves just Google scaring users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clear all your browser history and cookies first genius. This behaviour is documented on the official Google forums by over 10,000 people.

      Don't act like "just because it doesn't happen to me must mean it doesn't happen to anybody."

    15. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL if you need a citation to know Google does this then I'm not the one with an objectivity issue.
      The double standards we apply to this company because of the piss off we have from the 90s and early 2000s is hilarious. Show me where ChromeOS has allowed 3rd party browser installs before Linux app support appeared in alpha so spare me the monitoring comment. No need to monitor when it's not even possible. Like it or not, Windows remains the only mainstream desktop computing platform that gives you the control you claim to need.

    16. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone feels that they must use Google's search, then use startpage.com to make your searches private.

    17. Re: That leaves just Google scaring users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I see. In order to be granted the privilege of that prompt I have to clear my whole history, cookies and goodness-knows-what first. Of course; who doesn't do that all the time anyway? Except that - something is obviously wrong with my environment: I just cleared everything - browsing history, download history, cookies, cached images and files, passwords, autofill data, new usage data - in Vivaldi, Opera and Firefox, from the beginning of time. I exited the browsers, launched them again, visited www.google.com - and I keep getting the usual concise page - no big prompt for anything. What do I have to do to be worthy of the distinction of getting that "more secure browser" button? Perhaps Google does not want for me to have a "more secure browser"? What do you think? Should I sue them?

    18. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL if you need a citation to know Google does this then I'm not the one with an objectivity issue.

      I don't need a citation because I am taking your word for it. When I said that I'm assuming that you're telling the truth and am taking your word for it, that's exactly what I meant. Did you assume I was being sarcastic? I wasn't.

      I note that your angry response consists of nothing more than two personal attacks and an attempt to shift the goalposts, which presumably means that you have nothing left of value to add to the conversation.

    19. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by iampiti · · Score: 1
      Two things:
      • They're not comparable since one is inserting publicity about a product of yours when people visit your website and the other is showing ads in a freaking OS
      • I haven't seen a Chrome ad in the Google home page in years. And I don't use any kind of ad blocking software. Maybe at some point I checked a box that said "I don't want to see this anymore" and Google respected that or they realised it wasn't gonna work but the effect is that Google doesn't bother me with that.
    20. Re: That leaves just Google scaring users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of doing that, why don't you just use private browsing/incognito mode window?

  4. Warning! by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

    Installing those browsers could endanger the feelings of Edge. Why doesn't anyone love our little Edge? You Racists!

    That should at least get the left back into the boat.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Warning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are satirizing the left. That endangers the cultural revolution and leftist takeover and is therefore racist. Please join Linus Torvalds in his re-education camp somewhere in the Ozarks, MI.

      Never forget taking your daily dose of soy and Prozium.

    2. Re:Warning! by the_skywise · · Score: 1

      Installing another browser other than Edge without first acknowledging Edge's feelings violates the code of conduct you clicked AGREE to when you installed Windows.

    3. Re:Warning! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Soy? Is that the politically correct and gender indifferent version of "to be" now?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. Anybody sense desperation from Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody sense desperation from Microsoft on how to get you to actually use edge???

  6. I wish ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... Microsoft had warned me before installing Windows 10. :-)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  7. Ads are too far too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unlike Google I actually pay to use Windows on my systems. It needs to be an operating system, not a fucking ad machine, which is what it is becoming.

    1. Re:Ads are too far too. by theM_xl · · Score: 0

      If you think Google is not an ad machine and you're not paying for it, boy do I have news for you... :-)

    2. Re: Ads are too far too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I do not pay cash to google. I pay with my eyeballs seeing ads. Thatâ(TM)s the difference.

    3. Re:Ads are too far too. by greylion3 · · Score: 1

      What ads? - I haven't seen an ad specifically presented by Google (that I know of) for years.

      I use https://duckduckgo.com/ as search machine, and block ads on youtube.

      --
      Privacy begins with ..
    4. Re:Ads are too far too. by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      me too! And in Firefox, not Google Chrome...

    5. Re:Ads are too far too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      becoming?

      Sorry hun, it has been for years -- and they backported a lot of the ad-crap to the Win7 Win8 Environments.

      Linux Desktop for business is needed now more than ever.

    6. Re:Ads are too far too. by theM_xl · · Score: 1

      Google has ~35% of the global ad market. They serve you (nearly?) every ad here on Slashdot, for one example, which you can see if you close one. Unless you're blocking those too - Google's ads are fairly easy to block because they're relatively well-behaved.

  8. I still use Internet Explorer by jfdavis668 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The best browser to use to download a better browser.

    1. Re:I still use Internet Explorer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have you considered using Edge? It's the safer, faster browser for Windows 10 for you to download a better browser.

    2. Re:I still use Internet Explorer by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      its very useful for that (since windows not come with something like 'wget')!

    3. Re:I still use Internet Explorer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It actually does.
      Invoke-WebRequest -uri https://something -OutFile c:\temp\something

    4. Re: I still use Internet Explorer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't need to install anything to use it?

    5. Re: I still use Internet Explorer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's part of PowerShell 3.0+
      So anything starting from Win 8/Server 2012 has it.

  9. Let them get on with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intelligent people try to avoid Windows altogether anyway.

    The notification bar in windows is the single biggest disgrace in windows and is constantly abused with adverts (bitdefender, etc, etc)

    Good riddance.

    1. Re:Let them get on with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, there are two applications that I use that are only available on Windows - Quicken (the "offline" version) and HRBlock tax software.

      Although, if/when my Windows machine dies, it will be replaced with a VM on a Linux machine.

  10. Bestest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Edge: Iâ(TM)m the Best browser, the only one you need! Oops, I canâ(TM)t open this page, hold on while I fire up IE.

  11. they are not 'listening to users'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    don't kid yourself.. they don't give a shit about you.

    they're listening to their lawyers.

  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. Still has a prompt when changing default browser by xack · · Score: 4, Informative

    Microsoft still bugs you about Edge when changing default browser making you “switch anyway”. Plus like I said in a previous post Microsoft Edge is evil.

  14. Obvious dumb idea by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    They should've known they'd catch hell for this so why do it only to have to walk it back?

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    1. Re:Obvious dumb idea by StormReaver · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They should've known they'd catch hell for this so why do it only to have to walk it back?

      They knew they would catch hell for it, but they also knew there would be no real consequences. In the meantime, maybe they could get more suckers to try Edge before Microsoft had to stop its attempt to leverage its desktop monopoly to get back into browsers.

    2. Re:Obvious dumb idea by Junta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm going to guess trying to *intentionally* invoke Streisand effect.

      They *know* that pulling these shenanigans in a beta build won't have *substantial* negative impacts. No legal troubles (it was just a preview) and people moving to a different desktop OS? Maybe if MS wasn't pretty much a monopoly and there were viable choices, but they know their users aren't going anywhere.

      What they *did* get was every tech media outlet mentioning that MS considers edge good enough to tell people not to bother with chrome/firefox.

      So people mock Edge some more, but edge *always* gets mocked. I wouldn't be surprised if some casual users latched on to the 'hmm... maybe Microsoft has something if they are willing to try to take things that far, maybe I'll give it a try now.

      Basically, MS has nothing to lose, but the publicity might move the needle a little. I guarantee that edge nor Windows *loses* any share over this.

      One could argue this undoes their efforts to earn goodwill by appearing to be industry friendly, but realistically speaking people don't trust them anyway.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    3. Re:Obvious dumb idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should've known they'd catch hell for this so why do it only to have to walk it back?

      They knew they would catch hell for it, but they also knew there would be no real consequences. In the meantime, maybe they could get more suckers to try Edge before Microsoft had to stop its attempt to leverage its desktop monopoly to get back into browsers.

      Great publicity. Look how many people are talking about it on this thread alone.

    4. Re:Obvious dumb idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least here nobody is reading it. So there really are no consequences!

  15. Nice false equivilance by Uberbah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The feature raised some hackles and brought back memories of Microsoft's strong-arm tactics promoting its old Internet Explorer browser in the first browser wars two decades ago. But Microsoft isn't alone in such tactics: Google promotes its Chrome browser as faster and safer to people who visit its own websites with other browsers.

    Yeah, Microsoft is alone in these tactics as Google isn't interrupting other installations. If Microsoft put up an ad on Bing.com calling Edge the fastest secure browser, then you'd have a comparison.

    1. Re:Nice false equivilance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does edge have a version of ublock origin or any other ad blockers? if the answer is no then it's not more secure.

    2. Re:Nice false equivilance by dissy · · Score: 1

      does edge have a version of ublock origin or any other ad blockers? if the answer is no then it's not more secure.

      I was shocked to see that there is an adblock extension for edge in the microsoft store.

      I don't use edge so don't know if it works the same, but it was from the same group that the chrome/firefox extension is from.

      Only on a 3-second lark did I search for "noscript" and "scriptsafe" finding no results, and I'm not near a win10 computer now to check for ublock.

    3. Re:Nice false equivilance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ublock is present.

    4. Re:Nice false equivilance by toddestan · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, Chrome is shovelware that's bundled in with a lot of other installers, so it's not like Google isn't evil either. If Microsoft wanted to do something actually useful, they could have thrown up a warning along the lines of "It looks like installer is also trying to install Chrome. Are you sure you meant to do that?".

    5. Re:Nice false equivilance by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Google is evil AF - their engineers are resigning at giving China a fraction of the capabilities that the NSA/CIA/FBI have had with access to Google's services for at least a decade, but DGAF about writing murderbot software for the Pentagon.

      But on this specific evil, Microsoft is alone. If we started seeing pop ups on Android devices whenever we try to install Firefox, we'll have an apples to apples comparison, but not until then.

  16. Convicted monopolist shows monopolist how to do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Convicted monopolist shows monopolist how to do it

  17. Will Firefox show up in the store? by Walter+White · · Score: 1

    It wasn't there yesterday when I looked. I didn't bother looking for chrome.

    1. Re:Will Firefox show up in the store? by zekica · · Score: 2

      Take a look at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-... section 10.2.1

    2. Re:Will Firefox show up in the store? by Walter+White · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the specific reference.
      >Apps that browse the web must use the appropriate HTML and JavaScript engines provided by the Windows Platform.

      I wonder if that's TOS speak for "other browsers need not apply" or if there is a valid reason for that exclusion.

    3. Re:Will Firefox show up in the store? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I suspect the terms have the convenient feature of being a bit of both. It's not false that 'just use a never-updated internal copy of webkit as a minimum-effort cross platform porting tool" is vastly worse for security than using the actually-maintained platform tools for rendering potentially untrustworthy material. However, the rules as written also mean that no other browsers are allowed in the app store: you can slap your logo and few UI tweaks on Edge; but that's the extent of it. Basically the same arrangement as iOS; which isn't a good sign from the perspective of people who purchase Windows because it runs the programs they want rather than to enjoy Microsoft's Rich Consumer App Experiences.

  18. Wut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    OP didn't say Google was NOT an ad machine. OP's point is you pay for the OS, it's not an ad-supported service.

  19. Disturbing Microsoft even considering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I know this was not released into a mainstream version of Windows 10. But just the ideal Microsoft was even testing it is disturbing. Windows for me has always been the best OS purely on the fact it runs so many software titles. If Microsoft decides for me what apps can run on Windows then its time to find a different OS. Sorry Edge hasn't worked out for you Microsoft. Maybe rethink the whole concept and make a browser people will actually use? Instead of trying to force it on everyone.

  20. Well, duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Microsoft Windows U-turn Removes Warning About Installing Chrome, Firefox

    Was there ever any doubt? Realistically, everyone (outside of MS, I guess, and the /. haters) only needed 3 seconds to realize this wasn't going to fly and had already moved on with their lives.

  21. The more likely reason... by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    "Oh shit we've opened ourselves up to another antitrust lawsuit!"

    I'm somewhat disappointed that they reversed course. Microsoft desperately needs to be slapped around with how they've managed Windows 10.

  22. So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't turn on my wifi without being triangulated by google. And yes.. I paid for my phone. Wonder when that will be removed.

  23. Google Chrome hypocrisy by sremick · · Score: 2

    Now can the tech world stop being hypocrites and come down on Google next for the shit they're pulling with Chrome?

    Drive-by trojan installs inside of unrelated software. Endless nagging to change the default browser, leveraging their market share of online services (search, email, etc) to do so. Proprietary web markup resulting in "This page requires Google Chrome" crap that Microsoft got their ass reamed out about during the original browser wars.

    https://www.theverge.com/2018/...

    People have short attention spans. Google is pulling all the same shit Microsoft got held to the fire over but for some reason everyone is willing to give Google a free pass. What the fuck? Browser monoculture is NOT ok... all the same reasons apply even when it's Chrome and not IE.

    Chrome is a fucking arrogant RAM and resource hog and you're better off using Firefox anyway. Is Firefox perfect? Of course not, they have lots of room for improvement. But compared to the clusterfuck that Chrome has become, it's the lesser of 3 evils by a mile.

    1. Re:Google Chrome hypocrisy by clockley(571021718) · · Score: 1

      All relevant parts of Chrome, JavaScript and HTML engines, plugin architecture, etc are open source. Additionally Chrome has far fewer proprietary extensions then IE ever had. It's just that Edge still does not support basic stuff like Formdata.

    2. Re:Google Chrome hypocrisy by DRJlaw · · Score: 2

      All relevant parts of Chrome, JavaScript and HTML engines, plugin architecture, etc are open source. Additionally Chrome has far fewer proprietary extensions then IE ever had. It's just that Edge still does not support basic stuff like Formdata.

      Chrome is not open source, Chromium is. And even then:

      "Drive-by trojan installs [of Chromium] inside of unrelated software. Endless nagging to change [to] the [Chromiom] browser, leveraging their market share of online services (search, email, etc) to do so. Proprietary web markup resulting in "This page requires Google [Chromium]" crap that Microsoft got their ass reamed out about during the original browser wars."

      How would open-sourceness negate the abuse-of-market practices that surround each mention of an (allegedly) open source browser? The fact that others could pump oil from the ground was not sufficient to save Standard Oil, because what is prohibited is the behavior by those having market power, not having a unique product.

      And again, Chrome is not open source, Chromium is.

  24. Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever heard of Firefox?

  25. Quitters Do Win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I quit Facebook a long time ago.
    Every now and again, a friend or family member will mention a post in some huge fight thread on Facebook.
    I always think to myself that quitting Facebook was one the better decisions that I've made in my life.

    Likewise, in 2005, I removed Windows and installed Ubuntu Linux. I did change to Linux Mint, but never went back to Windows.
    13 years later, I see yet another Slashdot article about yet another stupid thing Windows 10 does to its users.
    I just thought to myself that quitting Windows was one of the better decisions that I've made in my life.

    Life is too short to live in an abusive toxic environment.

  26. Or search for Google in IE or Edge. . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    . . . when you type "Google" into the search bar. it delivers a Bing Search box, and asks why not use Bing instead. . . and THEN links Google, but not a search box. . .

  27. Reminds you of their DR-DOS stunt... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... back in the '90s, doesn't it?

    That bunch never seems to learn. It wouldn't surprise me if Windows also pushes back when you try to make Firefox, Chrome, Opera, et al, the default browser.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    1. Re:Reminds you of their DR-DOS stunt... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      ... back in the '90s, doesn't it?

      That bunch never seems to learn. It wouldn't surprise me if Windows also pushes back when you try to make Firefox, Chrome, Opera, et al, the default browser.

      You mean, again. There was a well known issue in the '90's where Microsoft would ask you during an update if you wanted to to switch your default browser from Netscape to IE, and no matter what button you pressed, it'd do it anyway. From memory, when this was exposed it was put down to a coding error and the responsible coder was "fired".

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Reminds you of their DR-DOS stunt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was that time I thought I'd update to IE6 on Windows 98SE, and the system got unbootable or unusable. I then never updated Windows ever again (till I got pwned in 2009)

    3. Re:Reminds you of their DR-DOS stunt... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      There was that time I thought I'd update to IE6 on Windows 98SE, and the system got unbootable or unusable. I then never updated Windows ever again (till I got pwned in 2009)

      If you only had to reinstall Windows from scratch the one time, especially in the late nineties, count yourself very lucky.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  28. suffering from past decisions by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Caveat; I'm neither an Edge nor a Chrome user.

    Can't speak to the Chrome situation, but to me it doesn't matter if Edge was the greatest and fastest and most feature-rich browser that walked the earth. And yes, I regularly get nagged to use Edge instead, or speak to Cortana, neither of which I am ever inclined to do.

    For me Microsoft forever ruined any chance of me ever trying a M$ built browser by how hard they promoted IE through the years, and (more importantly) how crappy it was. The only real usage of which was for websites that didn't work with any other browser. (Or noobs who didn't know other browsers existed, and thought IE was "the internet".)

    Actions have consequences. Microsoft's actions have insured that I don't use any product of theirs unless there is no practical alternative. That's just the way it is. And there's no solution, except perhaps rebrand themselves and try to build up a new loyal following. (re: comcast/xfinity) And I'm not likely to fall for that either.

    Side note to Adobe: Dammit guys, PORT TO LINUX. You're the only reason I still own a Windows box. Adobe alternatives are looking better and better.

    I *have* to keep IE around for those thankfully fewer and fewer websites that won't work any other way, but I'll be damned if I step on another Microsoft browser merry-go-round. Fool me once, etc.

    That reminds me of a time... Years ago, I was hired on the side to fix a small business website. The previous designer had used Frontpage. The website rendered (mostly) correctly in IE but was a mess in any other browser. Most of my work was expunging all the Frontpage crap and replacing it with browser-agnostic code.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  29. Nah, it's not broken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've tried.... and tried... and tried to use Edge every time they issue an update, but the fact is that I have yet to have a browsing session where I'm not forced to switch to another browser like Firefox or Chrome just to get stuff to work! I don't think I've been able to spend more than 5 minutes using Edge before running into an issue where downloads refuse to work, pages won't load, server connections reset or drop, or page components mysteriously disappear for no apparent reason. These aren't issues with the GUI, speed, or Ease of Use.... it's actually broken! I really wanted to give MS a chance with Edge since I've hated on IE for so long, but they're making it impossible....

  30. Great to see Microsoft has learned something ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... from the browser-bundling antitrust actions taken against it in the US and the EU. Those tough remedies are really paying off!

  31. Oh, oh, GOD... by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 0

    Oh, GOOOODDDD I'm so glad I don't use Misroshit Windfuck anymore. That would SOO piss me off. Misrofuck hasn't changed, it's just gotten older. Same old bullshit tactics.

    If I HAD to use a Windows computer, the ONLY thing MSIE (or whatever they're pretending it is this week,) is good for is downloading a real web browser. Fuck Miserableshit Internet Edgesplorer, fuck Microsuck, and fuck all their bullshit).

    If you like, I'll tell you how I really feel.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.