Slashdot Mirror


John Hancock Will Include Fitness Tracking In All Life Insurance Policies (venturebeat.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from VentureBeat: John Hancock, one of the oldest and largest North American life insurers, will stop underwriting traditional life insurance and instead sell only interactive policies that track fitness and health data through wearable devices and smartphones, the company said on Wednesday. The move by the 156-year-old insurer, owned by Canada's Manulife Financial, marks a major shift for the company, which unveiled its first interactive life insurance policy in 2015. It is now applying the model across all of its life coverage. Policyholders score premium discounts for hitting exercise targets tracked on wearable devices such as a Fitbit or Apple Watch and get gift cards for retail stores and other perks by logging their workouts and healthy food purchases in an app. In theory, everybody wins, as policyholders are incentivized to adopt healthy habits and insurance companies collect more premiums and pay less in claims if customers live longer.

30 of 295 comments (clear)

  1. And so it begins by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not fit enough, eat too much red meat, drive too fast....sucks to be you.

    tracked on wearable devices such as a Fitbit or Apple Watch
    Yeah, THAT will go over well with my employer. Specifically, no smart watches in the building. AT all, ever.

    1. Re:And so it begins by taustin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I take responsibility for my life by refusing to use tracking devices that communicate with companies that show no evidence of being able to spelldata security, much less actually implement it.

      Particularly since, which the insurance company is bound by HIPPA laws, Fitbit is not.

      This will last until the first breach, which is inevitable.

    2. Re:And so it begins by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2

      Thing is, it's none of my fucking business what you do in your PRIVATE life, and it's none of YOUR fucking business what I do in mine.

      I'm not willing to sacrifice my privacy, or yours, to maximize profits for Insurance companies. You think you're going to get LOWER rates from this?

      Oh you sweet summer child.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    3. Re:And so it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      This will last indefintely and become the new norm because it saves the greedy fucks money and enables even more data collection. Even better it forces those who wish to avoid such invasions of their lives to submit to them under the threat of medical bankruptcy if they refuse. Always expect greedy fucks to throw you under the bus in the pursuit of more coin, which is inevitable.

      FTFY.

      If you think this won't last, I invite you to look at the shitstorm that Equifax went through after they were hacked.... they'll be begging us for mercy.... any day now...... /sarcasm

      Even if they do get hacked, it will be swept under the rug as SOP, and you'll just loose even more control of your life same as always. Only now if you refuse you won't be able to afford a doctor without leaving the country. To which everyone else in the US will say: "And nothing of value was lost." Because they are all a bunch of fat and stupid sheep. Welcome to the first days of hell, we've all earned it.

    4. Re:And so it begins by arth1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Insurance is really just legalized gambling. Much like the tracks, not all horses are a good return on investment. No one wants to bet on a loser and the only reason to do so is because the payout is so high.

      While true, what the insurance companies do now is like increasing the betting cost on low ranked horses without increasing the payout. The end result is that no one will go the races any more.

      The more you track the customers and better predict their future, the less incentive there is for those customers to buy insurance. If the premiums could reflect your risk with 100% accuracy, you'd lose no matter what. The closer they get to accurate and farther from chaos, the more certain a loss will be, and the less incentive there is to participate.

    5. Re:And so it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Serious answer: life insurance is geared towards somebody who is a major provider for the family. The idea is that you're bringing in an income to support your family; if you die, the family no longer has that income, and hence could well hit hard times. Having life insurance provides a safety net, so that the rest of the family can continue on without having to worry about how to replace your income. (Think education, food, health, etc.)

      If you have children, it may well be worth the premium to know that they won't be hit with hard times if you aren't there. If you don't have children, it probably isn't worth so much. For me - single, no kids, no dependents to speak of - I haven't bothered taking out a life insurance policy; there's no point. If I had children, it might well be a different story.

      It might not make sense for your circumstances, and that's fine. But insurance is all about identifying and managing risk - pay a small amount on a regular basis, just in case you have a need for a much larger sum for some unexpected reason. If you can afford the hit of the larger sum, that small amount may not be worth it. If you can't, it may be.

    6. Re:And so it begins by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Breaches are nothing, a temporary PR blip.

      Look at Equifax. Masses of extremely personal data leaked out, media blitz for a day or two, and they are still operating with a promise to do better next time.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:And so it begins by rockmuelle · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not sure about the OPs case, but if you work around gear that’s sensitive to RF noise, you don’t want everyone brining their own transmitter to work. Even without a radio, electronics can interfere with sensitive equipment.

    8. Re:And so it begins by registrations_suck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "This will last until the first breach, which is inevitable."

      Um....yeah. Tell that to Equifax. Virtually no fucking penalties of any significance WHATSOEVER.

    9. Re:And so it begins by registrations_suck · · Score: 2, Funny

      Life insurance has never made any sense to me.

      I am alive, and healthy, and can enjoy life. So why should I give up money now, so that I can have more when I am dead?

      Also, why would I want my wife to think I am worth more dead than alive?

      With that kind of logic, she probably already does.

    10. Re:And so it begins by Aaden42 · · Score: 2

      the insurance company is bound by HIPPA laws, Fitbit is not

      So that's an interesting question... Is it permissible for a HIPAA bound entity to require you to waive your rights by disclosing protected health information to a third party which isn't HIPAA bound?

      If my doctor said, "I'll only see you if you agree to let me post your weight and cholesterol numbers in a classified ad in the New York Times," I can't see that working out well for Doc. (I also make zero distinction between the security/privacy standards of Fitbit and publishing in a national newspaper. Functionally equivalent as far as I'm concerned.)

    11. Re:And so it begins by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      I am alive, and healthy, and can enjoy life. So why should I give up money now, so that I can have more when I am dead?

      I'm married. My wife and I have two kids (8 & 10) and a mortgage on our house. Both my wife and I work full time.

      We have a life insurance plan.

      If I'm hit by a bus and killed this afternoon, the life insurance means my wife won't suffer financial hardship. She won't have to sell the house (she likely would without life insurance), she'll be able to afford a nanny to look after the kids while she's at work etc.

      If *both* my wife and I are killed driving home from the movies on a Saturday night, the life insurance means the kids are taken care of - Their guardians who now have to raise two additional kids won't suffer financial hardship.

      If you don't have dependants there's little point in life insurance, though.

  2. Works for now by budsetr · · Score: 2

    but if the public gets smart and demands that their data requires reimbursement for its use...

  3. I just don't know about this by OutOnARock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its like the auto insurance companies wanting to monitor everything I do in my car.

    These should be things that one has to "opt-in" for.

    I don't want the "discount" for being on an electronic leash......

    There is just something about this that rubs me the wrong way.

    1. Re:I just don't know about this by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2

      If it's employer provided/subsidized, you have no realistic option.

      It should be ILLEGAL for them to have that as a compulsory term.

      Full stop.

      Try that shit in Europe and see how long it works for you.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re:I just don't know about this by houghi · · Score: 2

      When it comes to comapnies, I really try to figure out when opt-in is a good idea.
      Even Googles search engine should be opt-in instead of the robot.txt opt out.

      Sure, it would suck as many people would be forgetting to opt-in and those pages would not be found, yet still better than the need to opt-out.

      It should be my responsability to be included, not my responsability NOT to be included.

      On a more related note, a friend of mine (we live in Belgium, Europe) told me and an other friend who worked at an insurance company once he needed to have his health checked every six months, because his life insurance was asking for it.

      We where laughing so hard, i peed a little, because, except for the initial check (and even that depends heavily on the situation) they are not allowed to do that and won't do that if they want to keep doing business.
      And throwing me out, because I suddenly have cancer because of eating too fat is not a reason to throw me out (as long as I did not lie on my application).

      I would LOVE a insurance company in Belgium asking for this to be able to trace their customers 24/7. Taxes would go down as the insurance companies would pay billions in extra taxes (called fines)

      "What about a camera in the car to prove you are innocent?" In Germany there was a case where somebody tried this and got fined, as the privacy of the general public was more impoortant that the innocence of an individual. (Could not find the Slashdot article about it. Sorry)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  4. useless data sources by sweet+reason · · Score: 5, Funny

    a friend of mine mentioned that when he wears his fitbit on his right hand and plays his ukulele, his recorded activity level goes through the roof. so getting those insurance discounts while sitting on your couch will be easy. ditto for posted food choices. when the company figures that out their next move will be to become big brother.

    --
    Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- A.E.
    1. Re:useless data sources by Entrope · · Score: 5, Funny

      This comment is much funnier if I take "plays his ukelele" as a euphemism.

  5. Re:Premiums for spyware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Worse, they can now sell a very comprehensive data set on you, for much more than the discount you traded for.

    As a bonus, when you decide you've had enough and cancel, it's a guarantee that data will be peddled other companies, who will then jack your premiums or refuse to insure you based on any indication of liability. Conveniently provided by your fitness data blob, that you traded for some stationary and a beach towel.

  6. No. Fuck them. by TigerPlish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The sad part is people will be ok with this. Fuck them, too.

    What is this, a space mission where our vitals must be constantly monitored?

    No tattle dongles on my car, no smart watch on my wrist. If the insurer balks, Iâ(TM)ll take my shit elsewhere. If my employer balks, Iâ(TM)ll look for. New job.

    Fuck 5em, fuck 5em, fuck them, and may the inbred spawns of bacteria that came up with this idea and all ideas like it have an interesting life. I wish them a very interesting, quite educational life.

    Good thing I have more years behind me than in front of me, if this is the direction the world is going I have no interest in partaking.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  7. An example of stupid by judoguy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This is so dumb. A tracker would show me as terribly inactive because I can't wear one when I work out. I train and compete in judo and bjj. Hard training, fantastic exercise but you can't wear a damn bracelet or sensor while doing this.

    A fitness tracker, like the stupid BMI calculation, would show me as layabout. Every actual measure of my health shows me to be in great health. I'm 65 and compete successfully at a world level in judo and bjj for my age. This is the classic case of how vs what. Look at the actual thing to be measured, not a poorly defined process that tries to look at how something MIGHT be measured. .

    --
    Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
  8. another corporate conspiracy ? by swell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Back around 1950 a major insurance company with an excellent reputation and very low premium rates set stringent requirements for its customers. Agents would fill in the forms with the usual information for clients; age, address, some medical background, etc. But potential clients had to qualify for the insurance policy. Like any company; older people would pay more for life insurance. People with accidents would pay more for auto insurance. But unlike other companies, many medium risk clients were simply not allowed to buy from this insurance company. At any price. And all approved clients got low premiums and were happy.

    But they went beyond that. Agents had a secret checklist for every potential client. Things you might never guess could disqualify you for the money saving policy. One item that has stuck in my memory all this time is this: any potential client who enters the agent's office wearing boots is automatically disqualified.

    Actuaries must have determined risk factors far beyond the norm. Perhaps they consulted psychologists and did unusual surveys to come up with odd criteria. Nevertheless, insurance companies take risks and need to protect themselves. If you want cheap insurance from a reliable company, expect to prove that you are worthy.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  9. Re:Progressive Snapshot Hacks by omnichad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're way more likely to pay the claim and drop you

    Yeah...that won't work for the life insurance ones. Everyone gets dropped after the first claim.

  10. Gimmick by fropenn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is really just a gimmick by the insurance company to make you think you are getting a better rate. The risk of death - especially for younger people - is really quite low. Even though exercise reduces that risk, it's hard to believe that it would make a meaningful difference in insurance rates (particularly because you don't really need life insurance when you are old). But, it gets them lot of attention and its customers think they are getting a great deal because they are into fitness.

  11. In the not so distant future by sjames · · Score: 2

    Talking fitness trackers mandatory for life of health insurance. No mute button. But it will provide very helpful advice. Obey or pay more than you make for a premium. For example:

    Jim, you are not exercising enough. Cotton picking is great exercise. We have provided a field ready to harvest. Instructions are uploaded to your Phon.

    Now, pick that cotton Jim.......more........more.......pick faster.......come on! Put your back into it BOYYY!!!

  12. Re:Progressive Snapshot Hacks by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

    Looking forward to the creative hacks people will come up with for these forced insurance trackers.

    Well, this explains why I saw a guy jogging this morning with about twenty fitness tracking devices on his arms and legs.

    I thought he was probably a student in the sports medicine program at the local university.

    But I guess he was just outsourcing fitness training for a lot of folks who would rather pay him to wear their devices, than to jog themselves.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  13. Panopticon by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

    I've mentioned before, the real danger of a dystopian panopticon future comes from insurance companies, not governments.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  14. Re:Ah fuck them sideways with a rusty chainsaw by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 2

    *Old man yells at cloud.*

    --
    I tend to rant.
  15. EVERYTHING about this is wrong... by gosand · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Where I work we have a health plan set up with Virgin Pulse, and everyone is strongly encouraged to get trackers for #of steps etc.
    Pretty much everyone has them, because hey - they're cool right? And it automatically uploads your info. Luckily for me, you are still able to manually enter your steps and other info - so I wrote a script I run every morning to go log into the site and enter them. Why would I even bother? Because they charge you a lot more for your policy if you don't. You have to hit a certain goal for the quarter or they penalize you.. whoops, I mean, you don't get the discount. And it is several hundred dollars.

    But I REFUSE to be tagged and tracked like a wild animal, all for the sake of "fitness". Which is a total sham. The "nutrition advice" and pseudo-medical tips they constantly hammer you with on their site are garbage. I lie on the surveys, and tell them what they want to hear. Not because I eat garbage and don't want them to know, but because I know better than their one-size-fits-all advice. I know what I know through personal research, and listening to actual experts on these things. I have been at my ideal weight for 6 years, and the only "concern" with my health is high cholesterol - which I don't really know if it is a concern or not. I haven't tried to get a real lipid panel done because my insurance won't cover it. There are 5 indicators for metabolic syndrome, and my cholesterol is the only one that isn't perfect. Yet doctors will try to put me on statins - based on one overly generalized test that tells you nothing valuable. High cholesterol, in and of itself, tells you nothing about possible risks to your health. "any history of heart issues?" Yes, my father had 2 stints put in a couple of years ago. "ahh, I see... so we should put you on statins". Oh, by the way, my father has an absolutely normal lipid panel. So why do you want to prescribe statins to me again?

    Our healthcare and insurance industries are abysmal. I went for a checkup once (required by the healthplan) and all was well. A couple of weeks later, I got a letter from my life insurance company that said I was required to enter rehab in order to keep my policy. I called my agent, who I knew pretty well, and he said he couldn't talk about it. I tried to call my doctor, and doctors don't talk to you. This went on for a few days, and finally I was a bit frantic and my life insurance guy said "your doctor indicated that you use drugs, so you need to attend rehab to keep your policy". I was LIVID. I left a VERY terse message at my doctor's office and did something that I hate - I threatened legal action if they did not contact me. I eventually found out that the medical assistant, who had done the whole "do you smoke... do you drink... " questions at the beginning of that visit had checked that I use marijuana. Which I do not. I still never found out why, but have to assume it was some mistake - why would I say I did? Anyway, I demanded that they send a letter to my insurance company to tell them it was a mistake on their part. Now... I don't tell my doctor anything. I answer all their stupid little questions the way they want me to, and I go about my life. What REALLY burns me about this is that it was my life insurance company (not my health insurance) that knew about this mistake - but because it was protected information, they couldn't actually tell me what was going on. It's an old word, but "cahoots" is about as perfect of a word that can be used to describe it.

    My point is - don't play into these types of programs. It may seem easy, but it is such a slippery slope. It's only paranoid if they aren't out to get you - and these fuckers are out to get you! Not to mention that their data collection is only to benefit them, not you. If you think all the people who have those fitness trackers are getting healthier because of them... think again. Everyone is still the same. The overweight lady who wears her tracker and goes to the gym every day is still gaining wei

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  16. It was bound to happen by p51d007 · · Score: 2

    Busy bodies want everyone to live, eat, breathe like THEY do, so now they are getting us use to having our heart rate, activity levels on our phones, watches for "your convenience", then the insurance companies will start using the data, as well as the government allowing or not allowing health care, once they end up taking over the health care industry in a few years. They are also getting us use to not paying "in cash" by using our phones, watches, of course, for your convenience. Once people ditch cash, they can just make it a law that you CANNOT use cash. Once THAT happens everything you do, everything you buy will be MONITORED. Tie health care into that, and then when you want to order a cheese burger, your card, tap, implanted under the skin chip will not be allowed, because you were too fat at your last mandated government checkup. Plus, if the government gets in trouble, like they did in Greece, just take the money from the banks. It's all just data anyway, no "cash" that you can hide. DON'T think it can't happen!