Slashdot Mirror
Facebook Executive Hits Back at WhatsApp Co-founder Brian Acton: 'A Whole New Standard of Low-Class' (facebook.com)
Facebook's David Marcus, who until recently ran the Facebook Messenger before starting the blockchain group earlier this year, is defending the company and CEO Mark Zuckerberg after a WhatsApp founder spoke critically of his experience at the company. Marcus: [...] On the business model. I was present in a lot of these meetings. Again, Mark protected WhatsApp for a very long period of time. And you have to put this in the context of a large organization with businesses knocking on our door to have the ability to engage and communicate with their customers on WhatsApp the same way they were doing it on Messenger. During this time, it became pretty clear that while advocating for business messaging, and being given the opportunity to build and deliver on that promise, Brian actively slow-played the execution, and never truly went for it. In my view, if you're passionate about a certain path -- in this case, letting businesses message people and charging for it -- and if you have internal questions about it, then work hard to prove that your approach has legs and demonstrate the value. Don't be passive-aggressive about it. And by the way the paid messaging that WhatsApp is rolling out now sounds pretty similar to metered messaging from my point of view...
Lastly -- call me old fashioned. But I find attacking the people and company that made you a billionaire, and went to an unprecedented extent to shield and accommodate you for years, low-class. It's actually a whole new standard of low-class. I'll close by saying that as far as I'm concerned, and as a former lifelong entrepreneur and founder, there's no other large company I'd work at, and no other leader I'd work for. I want to work on hard problems that positively impact the lives of billions of people around the world. And Facebook is truly the only company that's singularly about people.
Lastly -- call me old fashioned. But I find attacking the people and company that made you a billionaire, and went to an unprecedented extent to shield and accommodate you for years, low-class. It's actually a whole new standard of low-class. I'll close by saying that as far as I'm concerned, and as a former lifelong entrepreneur and founder, there's no other large company I'd work at, and no other leader I'd work for. I want to work on hard problems that positively impact the lives of billions of people around the world. And Facebook is truly the only company that's singularly about people.
Both/all of these companies are garbage companies that take advantage of people. None of them produce anything of any real value, except eyeballs for marketing people. They're all low class.
I don't respond to AC's.
This person sure is sucking on the Zuck!
In all seriousness though, what would you expect a Facebook employee to say? That they agree with Acton? That's not the way you stay on the Facebook gravy (money) train.
Also, first post perhaps?
Seems like a perfect match for Facebook corporate culture.
How can you be a former lifelong anything? Are you dead?
This is one sack of shit asshole in Facebook's management griping about another sack of shit asshole who used to be in Facebook's management.
You're both greedy assholes who trade in other people's private data.
So, let's publish the personal information, and family information of every fucking Facebook employee, and then move the discussion on to privacy.
Fuck you Facebook .. I don't use it, don't allow my browsers to follow any of those webbugs around the web, and don't care about your apps.
I hope you all fucking die in a fire.
They drove a dump truck full of money up to my house! I'm only human!
I want to work on hard problems that positively impact the lives of billions of people around the world.
And how is Facebook positively impacting the lives of the Rohingya?
Nope, no sig
Selling out your users and putting their privacy in Jeopardy is fine but trying to mitigate the damage by making sure they are aware of it when Facebook pretends they've left their acquisitions running untouched and without interference is not fine? Wrong isn't some pie to be divided up where his amount of wrong somehow lessens Facebook's wrong. His guilt in no way mitigates the wrongs of Facebook.
Thanks. I could listen to a competitor or a bitter ex talk shit about it. But instead I think I'll just let Facebook explain why it is so utterly valueless. Now I know that there's no hurry to ever try out this Whatsapp thing.
Yes, passionate about spamming. Riiight. But thanks again, since you also revealed that I should keep an eye out for the new spammer's jargon, "business messaging."
"Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
And Facebook is truly the only company that's singularly about people.
Soylent Green is singularly about people too.
Wah! You should be more grateful because we gave you money!
by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
It's very similar to "I bought you dinner so now I expect something from you!"
What total BS. Facebook is about *advertisers*. People are just the product Facebook delivers to them.