Slashdot Mirror


A Computer Has Written A 'Novel' Narrating Its Own Cross-Country Road Trip (theatlantic.com)

Ross Goodwin, a former ghostwriter for the Obama administration, uses neural networks to generate poetry, screenplays, and, now, literary travel fiction. The Atlantic tells the story of how Goodwin used a custom machine to write a "novel" narrating its own cross-country road trip. Slashdot reader merbs shares an excerpt from the report: On March 25, 2017, a black Cadillac with a white-domed surveillance camera attached to its trunk departed Brooklyn for New Orleans. An old GPS unit was fastened atop the roof. Inside, a microphone dangled from the ceiling. Wires from all three devices fed into Ross Goodwin's Razer Blade laptop, itself hooked up to a humble receipt printer. This, Goodwin hoped, was the apparatus that was going to produce the next American road-trip novel. The aim was to use the road as a conduit for narrative experimentation, in the tradition of Kerouac, Wolfe, and Kesey, but with the vehicle itself as the artist. He chose the New York-to-NOLA route as a nod to the famous leg of Jack Kerouac's expedition in On the Road. Underneath the base of the Axis M3007 camera, Goodwin scrawled "Further."

Along the way, the four sensors would feed data into a system of neural networks Goodwin had trained on hundreds of books and Foursquare location data, and the printer would spit out the results one letter at a time. By the end of the four-day trip, receipts emblazoned with artificially intelligent prose would cover the floor of the car. They're collected in 1 the Road, a book Goodwin's publisher, Jean Boite Editions, is marketing as "the first novel written by a machine." (Though, for the record, Goodwin says he disagrees it should bear that distinction -- "That might be The Policeman's Beard Is Half Constructed by a program from the '80s," he tells me.) Regardless, it is a hallucinatory, oddly illuminating account of a bot's life on the interstate; the Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test meets Google Street View, narrated by Siri.

15 of 36 comments (clear)

  1. Black? by skam240 · · Score: 1

    I have a few friends who have been down that way. It seems like if your don't want to be looked at funny (to say the least) black might be a bad color to chose.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  2. Gonzo by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Gonzo style writing is complete jibberish anyway so that is a good style to choose.

  3. "Policeman's Beard..." Was Not Computer Written by careysub · · Score: 2

    Unless you think inserting random words in human authored Mad Libs is "writing".

    The supposed "computer generated novel" was actually produced by a program that just substituted words into a set of frameworks prepared by the program's author. To quote the reviewer "None of the long pieces in the book could have been produced except by using elaborate boilerplate templates that are *not* included in the commercially available release of Racter. Nor does the Inrac language include any sort of 'syntax directive' powerful enough to string words together into a form like the published stories."

    The actual apparent creativity and absurdity of the prose was entirely the authorship of William Chamberlain, the guy wrote and sold the program "Racter" and wrote all of the frameworks that was the basis of the "prose".

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    1. Re:"Policeman's Beard..." Was Not Computer Written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nothing is cool any longer. Everything is just postmodern bullshit.

    2. Re:"Policeman's Beard..." Was Not Computer Written by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      This book is much simpler, and much much worse

      The time was six minutes until ten o'clock in the morning, and the wind stood as the windows were freshly covered with boxes.

      The time was three minutes to ten o'clock in the morning, and the conversation was finished while the same interview was over.

      It was three minutes to ten o'clock in the morning, and the sheet of coal had been broken.

      This is a trash book. The book was trash. The book was "written" by an AI, and is trash. It is 10 o'clock in morning and this is a trash book.

  4. Is this the first step to the Electronic Bard? by tonique · · Score: 2

    And is Goodwin becoming Trurl?

  5. I wonder if... by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    ...he used his machine to write Obama's speeches.

    1. Re:I wonder if... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      ...he used his machine to write Obama's speeches.

      Well, we are the ones we've been waiting for, ya know ...

  6. human touch by sad_ · · Score: 1

    Soon the human touch will disappear.

    books are written by AI, paintings are made by AI, movies are made by AI.

    it will take only so much time before AI becomes so good at it that all human art will seem inferiour.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    1. Re:human touch by fropenn · · Score: 1

      The technical ability to create something is only one component of making a piece of art, and in some cases it is somewhat irrelevant (the technical skill can be shown off in some pieces or works, but it isn't a requirement per se that the artist have exceptional technical skill). More importantly, art expresses something - a feeling, a thought, a belief, an emotion - and since machines don't have feelings, thoughts, beliefs, or emotions, machine-created drawings, books, music, etc. will never replace real human art.

  7. Phew! by Quirkz · · Score: 1

    I'm currently working on a novel about a self-driving car and a personal voice assistant that go on a road trip without people, to see America. When I saw this headline I thought someone had beaten me to it, but this is a different kind of thing apparently.

  8. (sniffs in condesension) by paiute · · Score: 1

    "That's not writing - that's just computing."

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  9. Re:NON-Fiction TITLE: "JUDENSreich!" by paiute · · Score: 1

    I wish to return this bottle of Dr. Bronner's Almond Soap. I think it has gone bad.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  10. Authored by a machine by ole_timer · · Score: 1

    Not written, any modern book is done on a word processor...so it's "written by s/w" but it's authored by the author

    --
    nothing to see here - move along
    1. Re:Authored by a machine by ole_timer · · Score: 1

      in any case, the ai and the wp were authored by the programmer...so they're the author, not the machine...

      --
      nothing to see here - move along