Slashdot Mirror


Cellphones Across the US Will Receive a 'Presidential Alert' at 2:18 pm Eastern Today (nytimes.com)

At 2:18 p.m. Eastern on Wednesday, cellphones across the United States will emit the ominous ring of an emergency presidential alert. From a report: It will be the first nationwide test of a wireless emergency alert system, designed to warn people of a dire threat, like a terror attack, pandemic or natural disaster. There is no opting out, which has already prompted a lawsuit. "THIS IS A TEST of the National Wireless Emergency Alert System," it will read. "No action is needed." Two minutes later, televisions and radios will show test alerts. There is no notification plan for landlines. Officials say they believe that the wireless test will reach about 75 percent of the cellphones in the country, though they hope the number is higher. It could take up to 30 minutes for the alerts to be transmitted to all devices.

Some things that could interfere: ongoing phone calls or data transmission, a device that is turned off or out of range, and smaller cellphone providers that are not participating in the program. The test, originally planned for last month but delayed by Hurricane Florence, is the culmination of many years of work. The federal government developed a system to issue the alerts, which are scripted in coordination with numerous government agencies. They are limited to 90 characters, but will be expanded to 360 in the future. The Communications Act of 1934 gives the president the power to use communications systems in case of an emergency, and a 2006 law called for the Federal Communications Commission to work with the wireless industry to transmit such messages.

25 of 267 comments (clear)

  1. Obama-era implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This was implemented during under Obama:

    WEA was established in 2008 pursuant to the Warning, Alert and Response Network (WARN) Act and became operational in 2012.

    1. Re:Obama-era implementation by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's the problem with making laws or setting rules that allow for an autocrat to have too much control. It's all well and good when it's your guy or some responsible leader that's more a figment of the imagination than anything, but this is precisely why you don't ever allow for those kinds of powers, even if they seem innocent enough or even good intentioned. Eventually it won't be your guy, or it will be someone quite reprehensible (and Trump's more of a buffoon than malicious, so consider yourself lucky), and likely eventually someone downright evil. That kind of power seems to be a natural magnate for exactly the worst sort of people.

  2. This is a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's hope it works better than the Hawaii test.

    1. Re:This is a test? by Howitzer86 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Step 1. "That'll never happen. You're being overly dramatic."

      Step 2. It happens.

      Step 3. "He's a different kind of President. You'll just have to accept these kinds of things."

      Repeat.

    2. Re:This is a test? by siege72 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They live the Narcissist's Prayer (https://www.chrisshepherd.org/the-narcissists-prayer/)

      That didn’t happen.
      And if it did, it wasn’t that bad.
      And if it was, that’s not a big deal.
      And if it is, that’s not my fault.
      And if it was, I didn’t mean it.
      And if I did...
      You deserved it.

    3. Re:This is a test? by Raenex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Step 3. "He's a different kind of President. You'll just have to accept these kinds of things."

      Step 0. Ignore that Obama hung out with the black equivalent of David Duke, Louis Farrakhan.

      Was Obama a "different" kind of President? We don't have to accept these kind of things, we just have to ignore them.

    4. Re:This is a test? by Raenex · · Score: 4, Informative

      Fox "news" is never correct.

      Denial is not just a river in Egypt. Ignore inconvenient news, including inconvenient photographs that show Saint Obama and the Congressional Black Caucus hang out with racist hate preachers. But here's the same story from the liberal New Yorker: https://www.newyorker.com/cult...

    5. Re:This is a test? by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 2

      What is the left's problem with one major conservative media outlet existing when they have NYT, WaPo, CNN, ABC, MSNBC... and ESPN. It's not like any of those is a paragon of unbiasedness. Last time NYT endorsed a Republican presidential candidate was in 1956; last time WaPo endorsed a Republican candidate: never.

    6. Re:This is a test? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Even though it is a national system, is it really nationwide only? We have a similar system in the Netherlands, and besides the (nationwide) test every 6 months, it has been used a couple of times to send messages to specific areas, for example in case of a rather large industrial fire; the alert warned people in the immediate area to stay indoors and close doors and windows in order to avoid inhaling the smoke. It's quite useful for cases like that, as it reaches around 80% of the population.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  3. And the message will read... by khandom08 · · Score: 5, Funny

    covfefe

    1. Re:And the message will read... by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Was anyone ever able to figure that one out?

    2. Re:And the message will read... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      It was a typo of "coverage". Why they didn't just say that, and doubled down as intentional, I do not know.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  4. How will they know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Officials say they believe that the wireless test will reach about 75 percent of the cellphones in the country, though they hope the number is higher.

    How do they plan to measure this number? That worries me WAY more than the fact that we get an alert. Is there some process built into phone software and.or the cell network that will report this, and if so what else can it report regarding my activity?

    1. Re:How will they know? by bws111 · · Score: 2

      'Hey carriers, how many phones were connected to your network when the alert was sent'. Are you under the impression they don't know this information?

  5. Remember when.... by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Remember when in 2006 the law was updated every was certain Bush would use to spam their cellphones with unblockable political spam? Then when cell companies started turning on the feature, how Obama was certain to use it for political spam?

    Don't disappoint me /. Keep the dream alive!

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  6. Why the delays? by schure · · Score: 2

    The GSM protocol includes a broadcasting feature that overrides all other transmissions in order to deliver emergency messages to all cellphones simultaneously. Why then the delays?

    1. Re: Why the delays? by Miamicanes · · Score: 4, Informative

      > The GSM protocol includes a broadcasting feature that overrides all other transmission
      > in order to deliver emergency messages to all cellphones simultaneously.
      > Why then the delays?

      Because roughly half the cell phones in America have historically been CDMA devices, not GSM. CDMA generally had comparable functionality (on paper, at least), but wasn't literally identical.

      Compounding the problem, major parts of CDMA's functionality was officially "optional" & left up to the carrier to pick & choose. Qualcomm intentionally allowed Sprint & Verizon to implement CDMA in slightly-incompatible ways... and Sprint & Verizon liked that, because it meant that even a theoretically-unlocked phone from one network would be forever crippled & dysfunctional on the other, EVEN IF a user managed to get it activated somehow.

      Ultimately, it was (mostly) Apple & Google who put an end to much of the silliness. Blackberry & Sidekick mitigated it... but only for THEIR devices... and used their mitigations as a way to try and lock out Palm & Microsoft. The main thing that saved Apple & Google was Microsoft's purchase of Danger & subsequent willingness to license out their patent pool on fair & non-discriminatory terms (and why Microsoft makes more in profits from the sale of an iPhone or Android phone than it ever did from the sale of a Windows Mobile phone).

  7. Notice you get texts when you turn your phone on? by raymorris · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have you ever noticed that when you turn your phone on after it has been off all day, you receive texts that were sent hours earlier? That's because the carrier doesn't just send it out to you and hope that you got it, the phone acknowledges receiving the message. Until the message is acknowledged as received, the carrier keeps it to retry later.

  8. Re:Not participating by deKernel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So what exactly is causing you issues with this? Local TV stations have been doing this for years for severe weather situations. Now if they start broadcasting baseball scores or election results, then I will be with you on the objections.

  9. I can opt out by TomBauserman · · Score: 2

    Leave my fucking phone off that afternoon.

  10. Re:Please tell me this has to run through committe by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the president is able to use this at his discretion, without supervision, we all need to prepare ourselves for a whole lot of pain. That orange buffoon won't be able to resist the urge to constantly inundate all cell phone users with an endless stream of what he deems "important information" but is really just a constant spouting of nonsense.

    You realize this is a test of an existing system, right? The alerts have been around on radio and TV going back to before most of us were born and on cell phones since 2013.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  11. CORRECTION for android users. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Informative

    cellphones across the country that run stock roms will receive this alert. anyone running lineageOS or other roms can disable the presidential alert.

    And im sure ill get a shitstorm of people telling me this isnt wise, but let me clarify. after Amber alerts basically turned EAS into a carnival of CYA by local cops hoping to keep their budget another year, I decided to disable them on my EAS receiver, where I can also disable presidential alerts.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  12. What happens when the system gets hacked? by TangoCharlie · · Score: 2

    This system had better be secure, because how much chaos could be achieved by 'bad actor' if they were able to broadcast a fake message (like an impending nuclear strike)? I suppose it'll keep the NK and Russian hackers busy for a while...

    --
    return 0; }
  13. just follow the sound by renegade600 · · Score: 2

    wonder how many people will be fired today for sneaking in phones into their workplace.

    wonder how many people will run off the road because some high pitch sound startled them while driving.

    wonder how many people will drop their phone because they were scared silly by a high pitch sound.

    it is going to get interesting...they really did not do a good job advertising the test.

  14. Re:No, and you don't either. Because they DID. by EvilSS · · Score: 2

    No, and you don't either. Because they DID.

    Really? Bush and Obama both used the national presidential alert system to send political messages? Are you sure it wasn't just the CIA beaming then directly to your brain from their satellite?

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.