Slashdot Mirror


Verizon is Offering Buyout Packages To as Many as 44,000 Management Employees; Some IT Employees Will Be Transferred To Indian Outsourcing Firm Infosys [Update] (bloomberg.com)

Verizon Communications is offering buyout packages to as many as 44,000 management employees as part of a cost-cutting drive, potentially eliminating more than a fourth of its workforce. From a report: The offer, which excludes executives in sales or crucial company roles, is part of a four-year, $10 billion cost-reduction program that Chairman Lowell McAdam put in place last year. A Verizon spokesman declined to say how many of the 44,000 managers are expected to take the offer and leave the company. Update: The Wall Street Journal adds: Verizon notified many information technology employees that they were being transferred to Indian outsourcing giant Infosys as part of a $700 million outsourcing agreement. The pool of employees who either received the severance offer or are affected by the Infosys deal amounts to about 30% of the 153,100 employees that Verizon had globally at the end of June. "Strategically we are going to invest more in transforming the business versus running the business," materials detailing the outsourcing agreement said. As part of that pact, Verizon is transferring about 2,500 employees in the U.S. and overseas to Infosys. Those employees aren't eligible for severance payments and won't receive their 2018 bonus if they are offered a job at Infosys and don't accept it, according to materials given to the employees.

128 comments

  1. What. Da. Fuq by HarrySquatter · · Score: 4, Funny

    44,000 managers? Da fuq?!!

    1. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Even more Da Fuq:
      44,000 manages "which excludes executives in sales or crucial company roles."

      That's SERIOUS WAT DA FUQ levels there. 44,000 managers that aren't considered crucial. How did you get there?

    2. Re: What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      âoeManagement Employeesâ just means most of the base employees. The offer is open to all non-union, US based employees (not counting Oath).

      Given that there have been significant layoffs every 6-12 months for the last few years I suspect there will be tons of people volunteering in the hopes of finding something more stable.

    3. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Firing all the PHBs?

    4. Re:What. Da. Fuq by hawguy · · Score: 4, Informative

      44,000 managers? Da fuq?!!

      They only have 160,000 employees, so 1 out of every 4 employees is a manager? No wonder they want to lay them off.

    5. Re: What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bloomberg article clearly says 44,000 managers. I've never heard of "base employees" being called managers.

    6. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

      Also, one assumes there are management employees left. So at minimum 25% of their staff were management.

    7. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Desler · · Score: 2

      Maybe this explains why Verizon constantly is raising prices for worse service? Gotta pay the managers somehow?

    8. Re:What. Da. Fuq by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe the forklift driver in their warehouse is a "multilevel logistics manager". Title inflation. I did a gig for a bank once and you couldn't throw a keyboard across the room without hitting a "VP of something", but most of those weren't even what you'd consider a manager of anything.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    9. Re:What. Da. Fuq by SoonerSkeene · · Score: 2

      At one point Microsoft had more than 100,000 middle managers and tens of thousands of "VP" positions. It's what happens when you have a shitload of money apparently.

    10. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Desler · · Score: 1

      Yeah I went to school with a guy who is at Goldman Sachs with a VP title. He stated the same thing that it was just a bullshit title.

    11. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's 44,000 Verizon store managers, and the remaining store managers will now each manage multiple stores.

    12. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They aren't "managers". They are "management employees." Basically, at Verizon any non-exempt, non-union employee at Verizon is considered management.

      Source: took my package 4 years ago.

    13. Re:What. Da. Fuq by hawguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They aren't "managers". They are "management employees." Basically, at Verizon any non-exempt, non-union employee at Verizon is considered management.

      Source: took my package 4 years ago.

      Calling a "non-exempt non-union" employee without management responsibilities a "management employee" seems as misleading as selling an unlimited plan with limits.

    14. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Desler · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Verizon.

    15. Re: What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Banks issue titles in place of raises. Having a VP title means nothing. It doesn't matter until you start getting stock options with the title. As a friend of mine said after getting his VP "all the fiscal responsibility with none of the compensation."

    16. Re:What. Da. Fuq by DigressivePoser · · Score: 1, Troll

      Maybe this explains why Verizon constantly is raising prices for worse service? Gotta pay the managers somehow?

      That's not been my experience over the last several years for cell phone service. It has gotten better and has gone down in price.

    17. Re:What. Da. Fuq by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      They must have had thousands of directors to go with those VP jobs too.

    18. Re:What. Da. Fuq by PPH · · Score: 2

      Labeling people as managers just gets around overtime and other compensation rules.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    19. Re: What. Da. Fuq by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      I think banks do it to make the customers feel more important. If you're sitting down the with VP of blah blah, you probably feel a lot more important as a customer than if you're talking to a manager, or worse yet a lowly clerk. It doesn't matter that in reality it's probably the same person (or one of the wunch) no matter what title they have.

    20. Re:What. Da. Fuq by commodore64_love · · Score: 3

      I refuse to be promoted to a manager. I make enough money as an engineer doing design or testing, and (2) managers always look so stressed out. I don't need that.

      Looks like I need to add a 3rd reason: Engineers keep their jobs; middle managers get laid off. (Even at JCPenney I saw this happen, when the $60,000 managers were laid off..... and then replaced with $30,000 salespeople/supervisors.)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    21. Re:What. Da. Fuq by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Almost everyone in Sales gets a Manager/VP... Or some sort of title. It makes customers who are dealing with them feel like they are dealing with someone important.
      Also to note Verizon is a Union shop and most unions do not cover people in management. So They probably give a lot of poor schlubs manager titles and salaries to avoid the union.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    22. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure Verizon applies the general label "management" to all salaried, non-union employees. Not just those officially in charge of other employees.

    23. Re:What. Da. Fuq by youngone · · Score: 1

      Some of the many, many managers at the last company I worked at were given the title instead of a pay rise.
      Either manager or "senior" whatever.

    24. Re:What. Da. Fuq by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      That isn't too much to be expected. An effective amount of staff a manager can handle is about 8 employees. Then a higher manager needs to manage 8 managers.... So that is probably 5 or 6 levels of management

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    25. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Management just means they are non-union. Lots of regular workers who are individual contributors are considered "management", while also not managers. (I was one of these)

    26. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a former Verizon employee who was laid off in 2017, most non-union employees are considered management although they may be hourly. Union employees are called "associates" who really work for the union and not Verizon.

    27. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Lost+Race · · Score: 4, Funny

      They had so many CxO positions that they had to move to a CxyzO system.

    28. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Algan · · Score: 1

      Management employees. Meaning anyone not in a union.

      --
      If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?
    29. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is that this probably correlates with the number of stores they have. Like just for reference there is typically 1-3 stores in a single mall, or near enough to each other. They don't need this many stores, hell they don't need any stores.

      People go to the stores to buy hardware so they don't have to order it online, but then again, most people can just buy the devices online. The only reason the stores for the wireless companies exist at all is because they otherwise would have the third party dealers dealing exclusively with the MVNO's, which are less profitable.

    30. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Relax everyone. 44,000 management employees is a shorthand way of saying this applies to anyone of a certain Band and above. At Verizon a Sr. Engineer is considered "management" because they fall into the band and pay scale of a management position. There are not 44,000 actual managers doing managerial things in the company by any stretch of anyone's imagination.

    31. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever get some jackass on the phone who asks to speak to a manager? Yeah, that's why. They're probably just the employees given a "manager" title for that purpose.

    32. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the telco's have "regional vp's" all over the place. Nothing more than a manager but makes stupid customers think they are special.

    33. Re:What. Da. Fuq by butchersong · · Score: 1

      Verizon and Verizon Wireless recently merged together. The non-union employees all fall under the "managers" label as well. There's a lot of redundancy at the moment. I'm sure much of it is just normal bureaucracy but much is just a result of the merger.

    34. Re:What. Da. Fuq by tsqr · · Score: 1

      You don't have to call people "managers" for that, in California at least. Here, if you're classified "salaried/exempt", the company is exempt from paying you for overtime even though you're not a manager in title or in fact. Interestingly, you still get paid by the hour if you put in fewer than 40 hours per week.

    35. Re: What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon tags developers, qa and other support staff as management so they can blackmail us into working strike duty without crossing the lines. This is bigger than just 44k middle managers. They also sold a bunch of their IT staff to Infosys.

    36. Re:What. Da. Fuq by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You don't have to call people "managers" for that, in California at least. Here, if you're classified "salaried/exempt", the company is exempt from paying you for overtime even though you're not a manager in title or in fact. Interestingly, you still get paid by the hour if you put in fewer than 40 hours per week.

      It's probably not for salary/exempt people specifically, but more for non-union people. Unions are funny things, and for the most part, if you have a company, there will be both workers in the union and workers not in the union. The people not in the union (excluded and generally prohibited from joining the union) are management. So if you're classified as a "manager" you can't join the union, even if you're doing exactly the same thing the union guy is doing. (It also means if the union goes on strike, as management, you cover their duties as manager).

      That's how it generally goes - they may have classed the non-union employees as managers to keep them from getting ideas and joining the union

    37. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you are certainly not immune to the H1B program or whatever they call it wherever you are from. Companies are using H1B program to lay off American engineers to be replaced with cheap Indian labor , or the offshoring trick alternatively. This is why you should demand the program be abolished and that you need to realize that there is no "labor shortage", especially not with 50% of jobs set to be automated out of existance in the next few years. The labor shortage thing is a lie to justify laying off american workers.

    38. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe this explains why Verizon constantly is raising prices for worse service? Gotta pay the managers somehow?

      That's not been my experience over the last several years for cell phone service. It has gotten better and has gone down in price.

      LOL!!! That's the funniest thing I've heard in a while! Sounds like you deserve verizon's quality of service. The rest of us will go with a better carrier. Don't forget the current chairman of the FCC is from verizon, and he is doing "great!" things for our country. People like you should be locked away in a room with other people like yourself. It would make the world a better place for the rest of us.

    39. Re:What. Da. Fuq by schnell · · Score: 1

      Also, one assumes there are management employees left. So at minimum 25% of their staff were management.

      The talk about "managers" is misleading due to what that term means at big legacy telecom companies. At any of the Ma Bell-descended companies (including Verizon), a "manager" is a salaried employee, contrasting with an "professional" (hourly i.e. union) employee. A very tiny percentage of "management" employees actually are "managers" in the traditional sense. So it basically just means that they are laying off a large number of salaried non-union workers rather than hourly union employees.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    40. Re: What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theyâ(TM)re wrong, itâ(TM)s base employees of the âoemanagement branchâ if you will. I know because I am one and Iâ(TM)m not a manager.

    41. Re: What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theyâ(TM)ve been selling off chunks for a while, starting with landline and cell towers. IT devs were sold off the Infosys as part of this, IT support will likely follow suit as theyâ(TM)ve already cut that workforce to unsustainable levels. Where you once had 10 people supporting entire states there are now less than 5, with the added issue of supporting any new sites brought on during the merger.

    42. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.
      AT&T classifies nearly all non-union employees as 'management' - which means they are required to take what amounts to scab training - how to replace union workers when a strike occurs

      So remember that when you have an AT&T service tech at your house during a strike, its likely to be an officer worker with minimal training

    43. Re: What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple ... you’re either a union worker, or management.

      It’s a euphemism so those in the union can hate on those who aren’t.

    44. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft? This is extremely wrong. Dozens, perhaps a few hundred VP positions at most. And no way there are 100,000 middle managers. The whole company has 131k employees.

    45. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling a "non-exempt non-union" employee without management responsibilities a "management employee" seems as misleading as selling an unlimited plan with limits.

      So in other words, perfectly reasonable at Verizon..

      Hey, you sound like management material.

    46. Re: What. Da. Fuq by Do+You+Smell+That · · Score: 1

      Your point is fair, but just want to point out you've gone from Banker to banker. I doubt the GP of your post was referring to anyone who'd ever remotely interact with a GS client (traditionally GS haven't worked much with us normies at all, until their recent Marcus initiative) , unless that client is itself a large corporation.

      Most expensive/high-level "management" / "VP" jobs in a bank will be held by people with 0 interest in the banks branches; rather they're in the back/mid/front-office operations on the _investment_ side of the bank. People who don't care whether the bank has branches, don't care where they are or who goes to them, as long as revenue is coming in to allow them to continue to operate investment operations.

      Still, while it may be offtopic a smidge, your point is also correct. Just want to broaden some views on the complexities of a modern bank.

      --
      I'm not good at making signatures...
    47. Re:What. Da. Fuq by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      Exactly, plus once they slap the 'manager' label on you, good-bye overtime. They make you salaried-exempt and work you 100 hours a week for fixed pay.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    48. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The good news in all of this is that in a few years Verizon will be going on a hiring spree. After the Indian outsourcing "experts" screw everything up beyond belief. They'll be paying people who know (or knew) how things work(ed) extra to come back.

    49. Re: What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in a region where the only viable cell phone carrier is a rural carrier that partners with Verizon. AT&T and sprint offer service, but neither have reliable enough service to consider using them or one of their MVNOs, and Verizon has somehow managed to ban their MVNO carriers from doing business here.
      In the end, Verizon is cheaper and offers better customer service than the rural carrier, so they are effectively the only choice. I hate it, but what does a person do?

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Wireless#LTE_in_Rural_America

    50. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      At a 1:8 ratio, and assuming that someone above is correct that Verizon has 160,000 employees, the 6th level of management would be a single person (i.e. the CEO). In such a structure, the total number of managers would still be barely over 20,000. You can make the math easier and get a good-enough estimate by saying 160,000 "regular" employees, who would have 20,000 direct managers, and then the next level is only 250 managers, then 32, then 4, and put 1 person at the top.

    51. Re:What. Da. Fuq by suezz · · Score: 1

      probably 1 of 3 if you don't count the union employees. the 160,000 is smaller because they are probably counting union employees.

      att is doing the same thing. thee have even more employees like under 300,000 and that was before the time-warner merger.

      both companies senior management are psycho. why they hire so many employees and don't make use of the ones they have is ridiculous. I guess they get their jollies hiring so many people just to let them go later. pretty sick way to run a company.

    52. Re: What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why wouldn't unions cover management? They do in most of the rest of the Western world. Unions in the USA are bizzare, and laws archaic.

    53. Re:What. Da. Fuq by DigressivePoser · · Score: 1

      Maybe this explains why Verizon constantly is raising prices for worse service? Gotta pay the managers somehow?

      That's not been my experience over the last several years for cell phone service. It has gotten better and has gone down in price.

      Guess further explanation is required since I've been moderated as Troll. My two phones are used to make calls and texts mostly. Data use is occasionally on Verizon's network but occurs mostly on WiFi. I rarely have voice or connectivity issues on Verizon's network. And my price for the same level of service has gone down over the past few years. Verizon just didn't lower the price automatically. I had to discover on my own that there was an alternative plan that carried a lower price. So there it is. At least one person is satisfied.

    54. Re:What. Da. Fuq by DigressivePoser · · Score: 0

      Condescending, check. Tribal, check. Fascist, check. Leftist, yep.

    55. Re: What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's weird. I am a developer in IT. As someone else explained, they call us "management" so we can be forced to be scabs in the event of a union strike. Been there, done that.

    56. Re: What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have been laying off people since the GTE and Bell Atlantic merger to create Verizon. Every year, just before Thanksgiving, is a 10% cut, this is just a bigger one this year. The joke in IT is not if you get RIF'ed but when. Sadly, the jobs go to India. That's the other joke... Some Verizon Indian Executive got their cousins company a contract worth millions.

    57. Re:What. Da. Fuq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that was the joke...

  2. B ark by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    I hope they got free tickets on the B ark.

  3. Government by p51d007 · · Score: 2

    About every time there is a government shutdown, they shut down "non essential" people. NON essential? Then why do we have them in the first place? 44k of "management" I guess means middle managers, along with their "staff"

    1. Re:Government by Cyberax · · Score: 2

      "Non essential" in the short term. You know, like fire code inspectors versus firefighters.

    2. Re:Government by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or hair dressers, TV producers, Management Consultants and Telephone sanitizers.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Government by evendiagram · · Score: 2

      The last person I heard complaining about "non essential" personnel was gentleman who ran a service industry business out of his home and was very, very angry that his fire extinguishers needed to be examined. Government waste and overreach by his definition. There's a large group of opinionated people who believe that it's more cost effective to only be reactive and not preventative.

    4. Re:Government by Headw1nd · · Score: 2

      "Essential" in the government sense means that the tasks they do are time sensitive. Can your job be put off until tomorrow? Then you are non essential. Someone at NOAA who monitors satellite readings for storms is essential, someone who chugs data and creates long term rainfall forecasts is not. Both are performing important functions, but one has a much shorter time horizon.

    5. Re:Government by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

      You know who I think should be essential? The guy at the airport who delivers the lemon-soaked napkins. My flight has been delayed like twice now and we are still waiting.

    6. Re:Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And those people should be called out for being dumb. Look at Texas for instance where building codes are quite lax. Now look at the parking garages that suffer for pancake collapse. They are literally caving in on themselves. This is a common issue throughout the country. In New York for instance where you actually have building codes those garages would be inspected every couple of years. As a result of the inspection structural defects would be recognized before the thing collapses potentially killing dozens of people. In Texas it only gets inspected once, which is when it was built.

      Prevention is almost always cheaper than reacting after the damage is done. There need to be limits so you can actually afford to build a parking garage but there should be a reasonable level to subscribe to.

    7. Re:Government by durkzilla · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're gonna be stuck there forever.

    8. Re: Government by diaz · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder why the insurance companies for these ramps donâ(TM)t require inspections every couple of years. Then the government just has to verify that theyâ(TM)re insured. Same with fire extinguishers, etc. The insurance companies have a vested interest in making sure the insured buildings are safe and up to code. If they arenâ(TM)t, jack up the rates for drop them.

    9. Re: Government by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Insurance companies discovered a long time ago that it is cheaper to have government doing the work.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    10. Re: Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fee for inspection would just appear on your invoice. It's not like the insurance company would cover it.

    11. Re:Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the open market would take care of this. Companies would stop hiring the same construction company, etc etc

    12. Re:Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insurance companies will just take the money and put an exclusion in the small print for "building defects that were present before the beginnnig of the policy" and obviously the customer will have to show that any defects were created after. its a WIN-FOR-US/MORE-WIN-FOR-US

  4. Verizon mush have the most screwed up org chart by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    of all time if 44K people are managers.

    Or maybe it's like a bank, where you get a useless title instead of a real raise...

    1. Re:Verizon mush have the most screwed up org chart by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Or they've just been around a long time and promoted people into management instead of having some kind of dual ladder that allows people to be promoted as engineers or other roles. People come and go, but the management tends to stick around well past the best by date or gets promoted into yet another rung of middle management. One day they wake up and it's seven layers of management between anyone making a decision and anyone who can actually carry it out and a fun game of telephone in between. I'm sure that some of them have people skills though.

  5. Managed pension buyout move by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 1

    Verizon at last has to off load its long term balance sheet obligations. The buyout maneuver takes it off the books.

    Can be, just before a merger.

    1. Re:Managed pension buyout move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon at last has to off load its long term balance sheet obligations. The buyout maneuver takes it off the books.

      Can be, just before a merger.

      Exactly! They are feeling the urge to merge or be purchased. Classic financial move. Maybe even a pre-bankruptcy move. Remember they've been dumping assets like FIOS and LECs.

      Word to the folks getting offers to leave.... Don't count on Verizon staying in business, if they offer you a buyout, make sure it's not cash over time. Make them put up the cash now or figure you won't get it from the bankruptcy court because you won't.

    2. Re:Managed pension buyout move by bernywork · · Score: 1

      They sold the FIOS division?

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
    3. Re:Managed pension buyout move by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Bankruptcy? Verizon made $20 billion in net profit last year. What assets have they been dumping? They still have FIOS. What are you talking about? They pay a good dividend too.

    4. Re:Managed pension buyout move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to Frontier
      https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/09/verizon-gets-approval-to-sell-part-of-fios-and-dsl-territory-to-frontier/

  6. Managers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Managers are the people you cannot talk to, when you call customer disservice.

    They are always in meetings, unavailable, on vacation, etc.

    I say good riddance.

  7. Now THAT is what you use the tax cut for! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just knew that the big corporate tax cut would be used for something good! Instead of just terminating those workers, they're severing them with actual money. Wow.

    1. Re:Now THAT is what you use the tax cut for! by Desler · · Score: 1

      But only management. The plebes are just told to fuck off.

  8. How does a company eliminate by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    That much while doing a major tech roll out in the form of 5g? This smacks of age discrimination...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:How does a company eliminate by Desler · · Score: 2

      Gotta fund the exective bonuses somehow.

    2. Re:How does a company eliminate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes but not the way you think. I work for one of the big four telco's and everyone in a lvl3 or 4 Eng position is over the age of 40 half over 50 (yes I'm in Eng).
      You do not leave important things like mimo/massive mimo/DC's to a bunch of kids and no one wants to supervise them long enough get get them up to full self sufficiency.

      This is just normal business all the telco's do it every decade or so. Offer a buy-out during a re-org and if you don't hit your numbers then the dreaded layoff happens.

    3. Re:How does a company eliminate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That much while doing a major tech roll out in the form of 5g? This smacks of age discrimination...

      Wireless operations are kept separate from wireline (your home phone, FiOS, DSL, etc.).

      Notice I said "operations". Too many people assume that means the entire wireless function at VZ; it does not. Operations means staff that actually handle day-to-day operations of the wireless business unit, like engineering, customer support, network management, device development/qualification, etc.

      There is a lot of "common overhead" (payroll, accounting, planning, product development, etc.) at VZ across it's various operating units that is handled at the level of "Verizon Communications" and not in the actual business units. Those "common overhead" employees are "no overtime, salaried" staff, and what some call "management" even though most of that staff doesn't actually manage anyone they are still "no overtime, salaried".

      So I can see how VZ could trim 44,000 "no overtime salaried" employees, but heaven help those areas that still have Verizon landline services when a union strike comes up. If those areas think landline service is bad now, just wait for that strike to hit in 2019 or 2020 or 2021; those unions have a 3, 4, or 5 year contract with VZ.

      When the unions go out on strike VZ calls upon it's "no overtime, salaried" staff to do the work. Most of that "no overtime, salaried" staff has never done the work done byt he unions out in the field and switching offices, so that "management" staff is trained in 1 week crash courses to attempt to do the work that the union did. Most would agree that pretty skilled work is not learned overnight or even in 1 week.

  9. So that's why! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why nothing ever gets done! Every employee is a god damn manager! No wonder the service sucks, they don't actually work to make the service better, they are just there to siphon the money from the customers.

  10. Are they passing that savings on to customers? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Call me a cynic (it's true) but somehow I think not.

    1. Re:Are they passing that savings on to customers? by Desler · · Score: 1

      Of course not. These savings are always passed on to executive bonuses and shareholder dividends.

    2. Re:Are they passing that savings on to customers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a good time to buy some VZ stock if it's such a sure-fire way to get in on these savings.

    3. Re:Are they passing that savings on to customers? by Desler · · Score: 1

      It's a more likely way than expecting your Verizon bill to go down.

    4. Re:Are they passing that savings on to customers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Rick-

      Slice your own face off with a rusty razorblade then stuff it down your own throat and choke on it till you die.

    5. Re:Are they passing that savings on to customers? by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      I fully expect my bill to go up because of this.

  11. I've always wanted to be a shareholder by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    I've always wanted to be a shareholder of one of these companies that did a big layoff such as this. If the company can do the same work after then why did they have all of these employees in the first place. I'd try to bring a shareholders lawsuit against the upper management for their incompetence. By having all of these extra people on for so long it wasted a large amount of shareholder value. They obviously weren't needed so they shouldn't have been hired in the first place, or let go of when then came through mergers.

    Getting a couple of these lawsuits won, which would be tricky, might stop these huge layoffs that we keep seeing.

    1. Re:I've always wanted to be a shareholder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /r/iamsosmart much?

      The goal is to replace full time employees like this with outsourced labor at a lower cost. They can save on benefits like healthcare, and retirement, etc.

      You seem to think they have 9,000 break rooms full of these employees...

    2. Re: I've always wanted to be a shareholder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reality is theyâ(TM)ve been âoecutting the fatâ until they hit bone. Support tickets have gonemonths before someone had the time to even look at them.

  12. How many are H1B contractors.... by RyanRife8866 · · Score: 0

    If they're getting rid of 44k FTEs, I wonder how many of their H1B (and non) contractors they're getting rid of?

  13. Managers are (mostly) a waste by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    For the most part, the only thing that they do is generate activity so that they will appear to be busy - meetings, notes, diagrams, etc.

    1. Re:Managers are (mostly) a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pump my footlong schlong in and out of your mom while your dad wears a gimp suit in the corner and cries.

    2. Re:Managers are (mostly) a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank you for your service

  14. Mybe they will be replaced with lower paid folks by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    Fire all the "managers" making $100k and replace them with new managers making $75k of less. Profit!

    It would be interesting if all 44,000 folks took the offer and left the company. You think customer service is bad now, wait 'till that happens.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  15. Re:Mybe they will be replaced with lower paid folk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US customer service at Verizon is also Union. Of course most of the non-union work is outsourced to the Philippines. I know this because I had to answer customer service phone calls when the union associates went on strike in 2016.

  16. Blame Network Neutrality by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    This must be the result of California's new Network Neutrality law! See, they were right! That law is costing us 44,000 jobs!

    1. Re:Blame Network Neutrality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This must be the result of California's new Network Neutrality law! See, they were right! That law is costing us 44,000 jobs!

      This has got to be the stupidest comment I've seen in a long time...if you're losing your job then good....someone needs to take it.

  17. Verizon as Trump campaigner by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    It seems Verizon is doing as much as it can to get Trump re-elected.

  18. fuck ... by Hugh+Jorgen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    InfoSys and the Indians. Takes three or four times for them to complete their work and get it done correctly. There is no savings if it takes them four attempts and they're paid a quarter of their US counterparts.

    1. Re:fuck ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll get better at some point. Of course, by then they'll be demanding a decent living wage or better. Good on them. Fuck Verizon.

    2. Re:fuck ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have this measured:

      My 55+ year old employee, who makes 4x what the offshore people do, produces the equivalent work with higher accuracy 5x faster than my offshore employees do.

      It's still going because the offshore guys aren't done with the first set of work while I'm on round 5 with the 55+ of giving him more. Since I'm still measuring the 5x is getting wider per day.

    3. Re:fuck ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw them both, let them build up their own sandpile and stay home.

    4. Re:fuck ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, it's not the Indian's fault. They're just offering a service. It's the highly paid managers at the American company, in this case Verizon, who are making the decision to take that offer and layoff their people and move the jobs to another country. Okay, they can do that, legally; but it seems like there ought to be some sort of tax consequence as a result.

    5. Re: fuck ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with that. They say that people from India are so intelligent and so much better educated compared to workers in the US. They fail to mention that their degrees are not even close to equivalent to degrees earned in the US or the EU and there is a huge issue with cheating on tests over there. Also if they are so smart, why havenâ(TM)t they fixed the rampant poverty and pollution in their own country. If I was in their position, I would also want to move to the US; however itâ(TM)s time we employ people in the US before bringing in low wage H1Bs workers. They take our jobs because they are willing to work for pennies on the dollar and have no issue with living 8-10 deep in a 2 bedroom apartment.

  19. re: H1B by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    Exactly! I find it rather sad that so many people are worried enough about Mexicans crossing over to the U.S. border illegally to "steal jobs", when most of the work they'd do is "cash under the table" stuff that nobody else wanted to do at affordable prices, or migrant labor that will just be automated with machinery, moving forward, if there aren't people like them desperate enough for money to come here and do it cheaper than the cost to automate.

    Meanwhile, they say very little about the H1B scam that steals real, "career quality" American jobs left and right -- often with labor that came here under false pretenses to begin with.

  20. Re: H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are seeing actual changes in the H1B structure from the current administration, small steps that are effective in fighting the battle against the influx of foreigners that are "leveraging their paper mills" to steal American jobs. Sucks. As a whole, those groups are awful and can't do anything. The businesses they sell their services to save some money in the short term, but they are cutting off limbs to do so, and a year or two out are wallowing in misery and begin to fold.

    Seems like every single little thing that's attempted to stifle the actual illegal immigration, rather than theft of jobs, is fought tooth and nail by people who have government jobs which they think can't be taken from them. Funny that. I got mine, mostly because I'm paying myself with your taxes, and I'm going to sit here and call you a racist.

    Good grief.

  21. More indians WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need TRUMP on this ASAP and ensure they outsource only to Americans

  22. Maybe it was supposed to be 440 managers... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    ...but someone got the decimal point in the wrong place.

  23. Re: H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wrong. I bitch about all of it. Until the US has negative unemployment, we don't need to import ANY labor.

    Mexicans do a lot of the jobs teenagers and folks in their early 20s should be doing.

  24. They should be digging ditches for FIOS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on Verizon, finish all those FIOS installations you promised us. We know you didn't really intend a bait and switch, did you?

  25. Re: H1B by hawguy · · Score: 1

    Wrong. I bitch about all of it. Until the US has negative unemployment, we don't need to import ANY labor.

    Mexicans do a lot of the jobs teenagers and folks in their early 20s should be doing.

    Back in the real world, the economy can't function with a 0 unemployment rate, around 3% is about the lowest it can do an still have a healthy economy.

    Immigrants (legal and illegal) are doing the jobs that teenagers and folks in their 20's don't want to do.

  26. Selling employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Verizon is transferring about 2,500 employees in the U.S. and overseas to Infosys. Those employees aren't eligible for severance payments and won't receive their 2018 bonus if they are offered a job at Infosys and don't accept it ...the way this is written at first I thought they were saying US employees were being transferred to Infosys overseas and were not eligible for the layoff...

    I've been through this "you're not laid off, you're their employee now, if you don't agree to that then you're technically quitting!"

    It's absolute bullshit and usually these are important, if not crucial, employees (to Verizon anyway...)... Generally these companies will force the 3rd party to agree to employ these folks for a specific duration.

    In my case it amounted to a "guaranteed" 18 months of employment which felt like a good deal at the time (considering my other former coworkers were now out looking for jobs).

    Depending on how badly Verizon wants these people to stay they may offer them a bonus that can be clawed back if they leave before the end of the duration.

    That said, their pay and benefits going forward are almost certainly worse at Infosys, and they'll likely face years of stagnant wages until they are either cut loose or quit while Infosys replaces their functions internally -- unless they happen to be Infosys-level folks (ie willing to be overworked and underpaid)

    Leaving the company I was sold to was one of the best things I had done. In hindsight I wish I had done it quicker, staying the duration to keep the bonus wasn't even worth it.

  27. How many managers left? by misnohmer · · Score: 1

    Out of 153K global employees, they lose 44K managers. How many managers are left out of the 109K global employees?

  28. People will just quit in 2019 by misnohmer · · Score: 1

    Since bonus is tied to accepting a new job, take the job and quit right after the bonus pays out. It will also give them a few months to secure a new job.

  29. US Companies Still At It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Replacement of US IT workers w/ Indian IT workers caused so much anger, from US public in general, in recent years, but it seems some US companies absolutely don't care! (And that is even w/ US Presidential help on the side of the US public; not on the side of those US companies!)
    Maybe US public should protest those companies better/harder?

    I always thought, by law, if any foreign person wants a job in US, the company must prove it cannot find any US worker for that same job!
    Apparently not so!!!
    (If this is because of a loophole in law(s) then maybe those law(s) need to be fixed?)

  30. Re: H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile, they say very little about the H1B scam

    You have a 5-digit uid. Did you create it way back in the day and then just never sign in until today? Because every time H1B gets brought up on this site, it is always in a negative light.

  31. Re: H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because teenagers and folks in their 20's don't want to do it, doesn't me they shouldn't. I've had a lot of shitty jobs in my past but it was a learning and growing experience that helped me to get the much better paying jobs of today.

  32. Centurylink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Centurylink did the same thing after they bought Level 3. Level 3 used outsourcing for their IT, specifically InfoSys, but even though CTL bought LVL3, their CEO became our CEO and the Level 3 way of life started to take over the CTL way in all aspects. My entire department was disolved because they sent everything overseas. We were internal support, not support on the customer side.

  33. The reason why there are so many âoemanagers& by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Itâ(TM)s a way to skirt the laws on paying overtime. If you put manager in someoneâ(TM)s title (project manager, program manager, product manager) then you can put them on salary, work them to death and not pay overtime. This is a practice that should stop; however, itâ(TM)s just as unlikely to stop as outsourcing to other countries, and expanding the H1B visa caps. All I can say is go out and vote and make your voice heard! Corporations only get away with what our elected officials allow them to get away with. F*** Infosys.

  34. Re: H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If unemployment is zero, then if you want a new employee with a good skill set you either have to poach one from elsewhere (and they have to poach one from somewhere else), not fill the position and hope in a couple of years someone comes along with those skills, and accept the loss of profit in the meantime, or train someone up, and then hope they don't move elsewhere in the Super hot jobs market. It's a recipe for wage increases that globally price US firms out of the market. So you'd just get more off shoring and a massive one goal.

  35. Re: H1B by commodore64_love · · Score: 2

    Plenty of Americans who could do those jobs (of course they'd have to be paid minimum wage, which the Ag Megacorps don't want to do). My main concern with Central American immigrants is this:

    - I don't like people entering my home without permission. If they ASK first, then fine, let them in (unless they are potential criminals or terrorists). For these people to just bust down the door, and enter our homeland, is ridiculous. It's breaking-and-entering without permission.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall