Slashdot Mirror


Australia Set To 'Eliminate' Cervical Cancer By 2028 (cnn.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNN: Australia is set to be the first country to eliminate cervical cancer, aided by its national vaccination and screening programs, says a new study. The country is on track to meet the threshold of four or less new cases per 100,000 women each year, effectively eliminating the cancer by 2028, finds the new study published Wednesday. The cancer could be classified as "rare" as early as 2022, meeting a threshold of six new cases per 100,000 and deaths due to the diseases are expected to decline to one new case per 100,000 women by 2034. But this is all contingent on Australia's high vaccination coverage and screening being maintained, write the study authors.

An estimated 99.7% of cervical cancer cases are caused by infection with Human Papillomavirus (HPV), a group of viruses that spread though sexual intercourse and skin-to-skin contact around the genitals. In their new study, the researchers at Cancer Council NSW modeled data on HPV vaccination, natural history of the disease, and cervical screening to estimate the age-incidence of cervical cancer in Australia from 2015 to 2100. Currently, Australia reports seven cases of cervical cancer per 100,000 women, according to the study. As well as eliminating the disease within 20 years, the data showed that the annual incidence of cervical cancer will decrease and remain at fewer than one case per 100,000 women if screening for HPV every five years continues and as long as people have been offered the vaccine.

8 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. It's not hard by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We could do it in the US, but we've got evangelical so-called "christians" who refuse to give their kids the vaccine, because Jesus told them sex is bad, m'kay? These are the same people who will enthusiastically vote for child molesters and men who admit to committing sexual assault because their helmet-haired preachers have told them they are "chosen".

    https://www.theguardian.com/us...

    https://www.thetrumpprophecymo...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:It's not hard by labnet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I belong to a Christian community and am from Australia where the vaccine was invented and there is ZERO objection to it here.
      The real problem is your screwed up healthcare system that throws poor people on the scrapheap of humanity.
      Our vaccination rates are high, simply because it is given free of charge to all school girls during school hours. No need to drag your bigotry into the discussion.

      --
      46137
    2. Re:It's not hard by sg_oneill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thats the thing though. These people are all about punishing women.

      Think about all the arguments used for abortion. If someones not prepared to send a woman to death row for an abortion, one must conclude they don't *really* think its murder. And its not about health. And since the same people that want to ban abortion start hollering about communism when its suggested they might pay a little bit more tax to ensure a single mother has food to feed her child, its pretty clear they don't give a fuck about what to do with the child they forced on the woman.

      Which really only leaves punishment. Banning abortion is to punish women for sex.

      And so is opposing the HPV vaccine. And in this case, the stakes are even higher. Have sex, get cancer, that'll learn you for disobeying sky jesus.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  2. Re:Vaccine for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It cost me $300. Why should I pay that, when the vaccine is of zero benefit to him because he has no cervix? I paid for it, because I can afford it, and it is the right thing to do, but many people can not afford it.

    Since it is not to his personal benefit, but for the benefit of society at large perhaps it should be publicly funded? You know ... the way it is in Australia? Or would that be socialism?

  3. Re:Vaccine for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    HPV is a STI.

    Immunizing both boys and girls stops the spread .

    Perhaps his personal benefit is working toward not seeing a partner, family member or friend die of cancer?

  4. Re:Vaccine for everyone by Ocker3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Exactly, 'for the greater good' is Actually a good argument (sometimes) for doing something. Especially when you can buy in bulk to drive down prices.

  5. Re:There's not a lot of those by mhotchin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think the parent was trying to say anything about the profession - it's the *evangelicals* who have the problem, but gave 45 a pass. I believe he is commenting on the hypocrisy.

  6. HPV is not the only cause of cervical cancer by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Literally, topic. You cannot eliminate certain type of cancer by eliminating one of the risk factors. The claim is patently absurd.