Slashdot Mirror


Russia Is Behind Cyberattack On Saudi Petrochemical Plant, Researchers Say (zdnet.com)

U.S. researchers from FireEye have linked a Russian research lab to a cyberattack on a Saudi petrochemical plant. The malware strain called Triton -- or Trisis -- "was designed to either shut down a production process or allow SIS-controlled machinery to work in an unsafe state," reports ZDNet, citing technical reports from FireEye, Dragos, and Symantec. From the report: The group behind the malware, which FireEye has been tracking under the codename of TEMP.Veles, nearly succeeded last year, when it almost caused an explosion at a Saudi petrochemical plant owned by Tasnee, a privately owned Saudi company, according to a New York Times report. The malware's origins were a mystery when FireEye first discovered Triton in 2017 and remained a mystery even after the New York Times report in March 2018.

But in a report published today, FireEye says that following further research into incidents where the Triton malware was deployed, it can now assess with "high confidence" that the Central Scientific Research Institute of Chemistry and Mechanics (CNIIHM), a government-owned technical research institution located in Moscow, was involved in these attacks. FireEye's report does not link the Triton malware itself to CNIIHM, but the secondary malware strains used by TEMP.Veles and deployed during the incidents where Triton was deployed. Clues in these secondary malware strains used to aid the deployment of the main Triton payloads contained enough artifacts that allowed researchers to identify their source.

27 of 81 comments (clear)

  1. Fortunately the malware went to a consulate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And then a was dismembered in a fist fight

  2. Re:Does the word 'obsession' mean anything here? by Tailhook · · Score: 1

    Hey; don't knock it too much.

    Prior to 2016 Russia could do no wrong. The establishment and its admirers were the same Russian apologists that they'd been since the 1920's. At least now they have their fucking eyes open; yes Virginia there are actually bad folk over there, just like Romney tried to tell your dumb ass.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  3. Mixed signals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Which side am I supposed to be rooting for on in this one?

    1. Re:Mixed signals by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Which side am I supposed to be rooting for on in this one?

      The side that doesn't kill or threaten journalists would be a good place to start.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Mixed signals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Which side am I supposed to be rooting for on in this one?

      The side that doesn't kill or threaten journalists would be a good place to start.

      Which immediately raises the question: Which side am I supposed to be rooting for on in this one?

    3. Re:Mixed signals by GrimSavant · · Score: 4, Informative

      Which side am I supposed to be rooting for on in this one?

      The side that doesn't kill or threaten journalists would be a good place to start.

      Which immediately raises the question: Which side am I supposed to be rooting for on in this one?

      That's the joke.jpg

      Russia's already been threatening and killing journalists that have been thorns in their side, and now we see the Saudis are capable of doing that as well at an even more audacious level.

      Russia has an interest in doing this on a purely economic level too, since Saudi Arabia is a dominant power in fossil fuel production and export, and Russia's economy is heavily dependent also on fossil fuel exports. Busting up the competition like this with cyberwarfare is a fairly obvious move in the amoral cartel world that these guys are operating in.

    4. Re:Mixed signals by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      The Russians want to reduce Saudi oil production in order to drive up the price of oil. They need the money. You should root for Saudi Arabia if low oil prices are your priority, for Russia if you own oil stocks.

  4. amateurish tit for tat by DanDD · · Score: 1

    This might be a belated but amateurish tit for tat.

    The problem with failing at covert actions is that they become, ah, not covert, and provide justification for a more conventional response.

    --
    "Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race." - H. G. Wells
    1. Re:amateurish tit for tat by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      the most monumental non-nuclear explosion and fire ever seen from space

      Absolutely NEATO

  5. Oh boy, it's them-Russians-did-something-bad time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    US main stream media is throwing up another smoke screen around the murder of that journalist to distract us.

  6. Selector change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They don't. They're really not more gullible than everyone else.

    I saw yesterday on Reddit, somebody doing a 'look at the hypocrisy of Republicans' claim. He'd measured them on key issues back in 2016, he measured them on key issues now, and concluded Republicans had massively shifted to the extreme right. Which he called 'hypocrisy'. Suddenly Republicans are all pro-Russian, black-hating, want healthcare taken away, and toddlers prisons at the border, out in the hate extremes of politics.

    *But* all that's happened is the *subset* of people who identify as 'Republican' has shifted to the right. The middle ground Republicans have been driven away. In the 2016 sample, he was sampling a mixture of middle ground and extreme Republicans, in the 2018 one, he's sample only among the nazi fringe.

    In the individual people, their views only shifted a little.

    The Democrats gained some Republicans, so the overall sample views of Democrats shifted a little to the right, and the Republicans lost the middle ground shifting them to the extreme right.

    Fox News still does it's attempted manipulations, but the audience wises up, and they have to replace the tainted presenter. That's why they line up new ones, so Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson, is lined up to replace Hannity. Just as Glenn Beck was overshadowed and replaced by Bill O'Reilly.

    1. Re:Selector change by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Troll

      I saw yesterday on Reddit,

      OK, there's your problem, right there.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Selector change by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      I assume you are talking about this post.

      They surveyed people in the Republican party... and then later they surveyed people in the Republican party. Whether the people are the same and the views have changed, or the views are the same but the people have changed, is irrelevant. It's still a survey of the Republican party.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    3. Re: Selector change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Democrats are just as bad, but since the Republicans are "in control" they consider their own malice justified at the moment. It's what Prof. Hubert Farnsworth would call "perfectly symmetrical violence" or something along those lines.

      The problem is that political parties, and more importantly their mouthpieces, are pushing members towards the extremes. They're constantly promoting the lie that you have to accept the ideology in its entirety or your opinion simply does not matter. You can't support gun rights and be pro-choice and be taken seriously by Republicans or Democrats. Your peers will berate and exclude you until you agree, and nobody wants to be picked on.

    4. Re:Selector change by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Idiots say agreeable things all the time. Hell just look at half my posts.

    5. Re:Selector change by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      There has been some digging-in and over-the-top rhetoric on the Right, sure; but not to the extent the Left has moved further to the Left. This ridiculous argument that the problem with the country is that the Right has moved further right just needs to die. The whoosh one hears is the doppler effect of the Left moving rapidly towards the left (blue shifting), and seeing conservatism as red shifted from their relative position.

      To wit: A few years ago, openly embracing socialism was taboo and democrats vehemently denied it. Today, Ocasio-Cruz is a bit of a young democrat rock star among a large subset of democrats. Many of the protests and riots over the past few years, whether BLM, Antifa, or others, have curiously seen representation of the Communist party.

      A huge contingent of democrats, including those in media and entertainment abandoned all notion of guilty until proven innocent (and reason) over the Kavanaugh hearing. The fact that it was not a criminal hearing is irrelevant; the notion, the right, is immutable.

      Screaming, chanting, angry mobs harassing Republicans whether at work or on personal time is actually championed (and on video) by the likes of Maxine Waters and Eric Holder, (you don't see that happening to Democrat lawmakers by conservative protesters) and doxxing of republicans has occurred by democrat staff, not to mention the shooting of Repub senator Steve Scalise at a baseball game, over politics.

      The new Democrat motto, unspoken, seems to be, "The ends justifies the means because we're just right, dammit". Any debate over illegal immigration descends immediately into strawman arguments, conflating illegal with legal immigrants, appeals to emotion, and (more often than not, false) charges of racism. In fact, almost any contentious topical discussion almost immediately degrades into emotional keywords rather than the rationally debated consequences, boiling down to accusations of racism, sexism, and bigotry in lieu of a factual rebuttal.

      Meanwhile, CNN, NBC, CBS, MSNBC have had to let go of, or suspend, no shortage of tainted anchors who can't seem to tell the truth or keep their hands off women. If you want to discuss manipulation, look at how CNN covers the candidates they like vs Trump. Look at how NBC famously edited the 911 audio tape of George Zimmerman to remove the question of the operator as to the race of Trevon Martin, instead making it appear as though Zimmerman was using race as the sole reason to call 911. Then, they came up with the subversive "white latino" term to stir up more racial division and further drive a wedge that generally results in bigger headlines and sensationalism.

      All in all, society has been moving more liberal and open over the decades. Most societies do. Major societal changes reflect this reality, from the integration of minorities into more aspects of life, including positions of government or corporate power, to the adoption of gay marriage, to the changing values seen on the great mirror of society: media, from television to movies, to magazines to the Internet.
      Just compare today's lifestyles to the stereotypes of the 1950s, 60s, 70s, and 80s, and this becomes self-evident.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  7. Good. by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    Fuck the Saudis.
    I think this is something that both political extremes in the US can and should agree on.

  8. Re:It's not quite the same by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Informative

    Republican politicians should be targeting ALL potential voters

    Nope. If they do that, they lose in the primaries to someone willing to focus on the base.

    If you want moderate government, you should support open non-partisan primaries. Several states already have them, and middle-grounders tend to do well.

    Open primaries in the United States

  9. Enough with this commie cyber bullshit by najajomo · · Score: 1

    Have the Saudis ever considered not runing production processes on Microsoft Windows directly connected to the Internet.

    1. Re:Enough with this commie cyber bullshit by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Kind of like what the United States did to the Soviets back in the late '70s.

  10. Students. by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    So we can assume that Students at a government-owned technical research institution located in Moscow, are behind the cyberattack.

    Just like students at MIT have done things in the past that they eventually regret.

  11. Re:Does the word 'obsession' mean anything here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Until they draw real blood, you don't have a case. "Influence peddling" is a bullshit charge from the weak minded. You present day McCarthyites are no different than the SJWs. You eat from the same trough.

    All throughout we have proven to be the aggressors, but we don't seem to have guts to finish the job. The object seems to be to keep the game going. Good for diverting attention away from internal corruption and introspection.

  12. Re:It's not quite the same by dj245 · · Score: 1

    Republican politicians should be targeting ALL potential voters

    Nope. If they do that, they lose in the primaries to someone willing to focus on the base.

    If you want moderate government, you should support open non-partisan primaries.

    There is nothing stopping people from voting in the primary of the opposite party. I do so, since my district will likely be won by my 2nd choice party anyway. Might as well vote in the primary for a candidate who actually has a chance of being elected.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  13. Re:Lol, set to -1 and look at the Putinbots by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    Thank you for admitting this is propaganda.

  14. If I Read Russia's Intentions Right... by Fluffymuffin+Cocobut · · Score: 1

    If I'm reading Russia's intentions right, it *sounds* like they are trying to get the Saudi's to increase oil production to lower the price of a barrel of crude - that sneaky Putin.

    --
    imagine a soft, buttery paw gently pressing down onto a sleeping soldier's face. forever.
  15. Re:It's not quite the same by s4080326 · · Score: 1

    Or you could switch to preferential voting to make third parties viable, the whole US voting system was designed prior to electronic communications and needs a serious overhaul.

  16. Re:Moron by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    Keep it coming, Boris.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.