Slashdot Mirror


Morocco Decides To Scrap Seasonal Time Changes (bbc.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC: Morocco has decided to scrap winter time and will instead keep its clocks at summer time, GMT+1, all year around. Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) is the time measured on the Earth's zero degree line of longitude, or meridian. The announcement comes less than two days before the clocks would have gone back by one hour on Sunday. Avoiding the switch would save "an hour of natural light", Administrative Reform Minister Mohammed Ben Abdelkader told Maghreb Arabe Press. The north African nation joins a number of others, mainly in Africa and Asia, which do not use daylight saving.

58 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn. by olsmeister · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess the closer you are to the equator, the less sense it makes.

    1. Re:Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well obviously you're not selling GPS watches with hardcoded timezones, or having a videoconference scheduled with Moroccans that now falls outside of their work hours. Otherwise you'd give a damn.

    2. Re:Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well obviously you're not selling GPS watches with hardcoded timezones, or having a videoconference scheduled with Moroccans that now falls outside of their work hours. Otherwise you'd give a damn.

      The product in your first example is bad and no-one makes products like that.
      The video conference example is also bad since not everyone changes to DST at the same time anyway and you already have that problem. It's just that it now becomes less of a problem.

    3. Re:Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn. by war4peace · · Score: 1

      If you sell GPS watches with hardcoded timezones, you deserve to go bankrupt.
      That video conference can be rescheduled.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    4. Re:Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn. by currently_awake · · Score: 2

      Seasonal time changes kill people, they don't make sense anywhere. The original purpose was to make use of daylight in a world where lighting was expensive. We now have cheap electric lighting everywhere, so why pay the cost of time changes?

    5. Re:Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn. by zdzichu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They decided to cancel DST change a day before it was planned. Good luck getting your software updated to take into account new order.

      --
      :wq
    6. Re:Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn. by GNious · · Score: 1

      having seem companies panic when Morocco switched to Ramadan time ... nothing new here

    7. Re:Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn. by v1 · · Score: 1

      i was JUST thinking that. I worked at a school several years ago when they decided to mess with DST hours. About 100 computers running an older OS were not going to get an update to correct the DST change, so we had to manually change 100 clocks. Then (2 weeks?) later we had to fix them again, because the OS changed them when it shouldn't because there was no way to stop it from trying to adjust for DST.

      It won't be the end of the world, but it it WILL be a big headache for some, and in many cases, an unexpected headache, especially for businesses. Bus schedules, time clocks, time LOCKS, answering services... the list just goes on and on and on. Very difficult to anticipate everything because coordinated time is just something you take for granted in so many places.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  2. Two days notice ! by Alain+Williams · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With this little warning just consider the confusion that this will cause. Computer systems with time changes programmed in; transport crossing international boundaries, eg a plane will leave France and timetabled to arrive at a certain (local Moroccan) time; diaries printed months ago and already on sale, etc. Did the political muppets think about this ? For anything like this 18 months is needed.

    1. Re: Two days notice ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't be so naive. If more time was allowed, the system would just try to exert the norm and no change would be made.
      It's uncomfortable but not catastropic. Other regions don't change and they will join them.

    2. Re:Two days notice ! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Meh. Morocco changes their clocks for Ramadan if it occurs in the summer. They're used to confusion. When I was there nobody was sure if the time was going to change until the morning it did change. I had a plane to catch.

    3. Re:Two days notice ! by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Morocco changes their clocks for Ramadan if it occurs in the summer

      Isn't that cheating? Or do they change it back to their geographical time during ramadan?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:Two days notice ! by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 3, Informative
      eg a plane will leave France and timetabled to arrive at a certain (local Moroccan) time

      Morocco was different from France before, and will be different from France after the change. And very few people in Morocco have any regard for time anyway - I am pretty sure it runs on "African Time" ie an hour late for everything. I think you chose the wrong example here.

      The reality is that DST sucks. In some countries, the length of the day changes by less than an hour anyway. Here in the UK, it changes (gradually) between 18 hours of daylight and 6 hours of daylight. So DST might be considered to "help" for about an hour, for about a month, During that month, dawn and dusk are not when your body clock expects, leading to more accidents, especially for people driving to or from work. Six months later, it goes the other way, with similar "benefits".

      As for the theory that it helps farmers - I have news for you - cows and sheep don't wear watches, not even Apple ones, and goats would disregard them even if they could tell the time. The sun shines and rain falls with absolutely no regard for the church clock, and have done since church clocks were introduced roughly 1,000 years ago. So, no. No use to farmers. But, changing the (solar) time that "Farmer's World" is broadcast, probably costs it significant audience share.

      As for political muppets "thinking", what planet are you on?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    5. Re:Two days notice ! by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2

      eg a plane will leave France and timetabled to arrive at a certain (local Moroccan) time

      Morocco was different from France before, and will be different from France after the change. And very few people in Morocco have any regard for time anyway - I am pretty sure it runs on "African Time" ie an hour late for everything. I think you chose the wrong example here.

      The reason that I chose an airplane is because its published timetable depends, in part, on it leaving, say, Paris at a certain time according to French time, then arrives in Marrakech 2 hours 30 minutes later and published according to Moroccan time. The return flight, leaving 45/whatever minutes later will be published in Moroccan time. The published Moroccan times for next week will now need to be changed. This will cause confusion as to when collect friends from the airport and more importantly when to arrive for the return flight to Paris.

      Rail entirely within Morocco is not so much a problem - they can just stick to Moroccan time.

    6. Re:Two days notice ! by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Confused former Muslim here. Why did they change the clocks for Ramadan exactly? I've literally never heard of such a thing.

      Of course, that doesn't mean you're wrong. Even before I turned to apostasy, I was a pretty terrible Muslim.

      I do get the not knowing until the morning of (or actually the night before). The start of Ramadan is based on the Moon, so you don't know the exact date until the night before (although you usually know it's going to be one of 2-3 days).

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    7. Re:Two days notice ! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I have no idea. I assumed it was to make fasting easier. If you sleep in an extra hour in the morning you've got one hour less of sunlight. Except I think the change was in the other direction.

      News story from last year. No explanation though.
      https://www.moroccoworldnews.c...

    8. Re:Two days notice ! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      They switch from DST to standard time.

  3. Does anyone have a good argument by haus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i am hard pressed to think of any reason why we keep going through with this ritual. Pick a time and stick to it. If you have a specific need for daylight, schedule appropriately.

    1. Re:Does anyone have a good argument by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      If you have a specific need for daylight, schedule appropriately.

      Often, schedules need to match other schedules, outside of our control. For instance, many people can't just decide to shift their work schedule.

    2. Re:Does anyone have a good argument by haus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Almost no one has a job need for daylight. The few that do will obviously base their work around that need.

      If a farmer wants to harvest their crop starting at daybreak, they do not need a time change to help them figure out when the sun will rise.

    3. Re:Does anyone have a good argument by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Almost no one has a job need for daylight

      No, but job schedule determines other things, such as commute and free time.

    4. Re: Does anyone have a good argument by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Yeah, who cares if their kids are waiting for the bus in pitch black?

      I guess he would, but not me.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    5. Re: Does anyone have a good argument by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      Only if all needs are uniform, which they're not. Home Depot changes its hours with the sun despite DST. How could we ever find out when they're open, then? If only we had an Internet with integrated calendars and navigation!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re: Does anyone have a good argument by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, who cares if their kids are waiting for the bus in pitch black? You idiot virgin.

      Yes, it's a wonder people in Canada, northern Europe etc. survive when all our kids get eaten by a grue.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:Does anyone have a good argument by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2
      Because it's simpler to change the time twice a year for everyone at a common time than having everyone constantly switching their hours and schedules randomly

      Which totally explains why Americans change theirs different from everyone else.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    8. Re: Does anyone have a good argument by VanessaE · · Score: 1

      Or, there's this little magic box about the volume of a deck of cards that can put you into contact with the store by [*gasp*] voice.

      Heaven forbid, someone should have to use one of those weird little things.....

    9. Re:Does anyone have a good argument by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If you have a specific need for daylight, schedule appropriately.

      I tried, but the bank manager refused to open the bank just for me.

    10. Re: Does anyone have a good argument by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, who cares if their kids are waiting for the bus in pitch black?

      Is that a question? The answer is very few people.

    11. Re: Does anyone have a good argument by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

      Or, there's this little magic box about the volume of a deck of cards that can put you into contact with the store by [*gasp*] voice.

      Heaven forbid, someone should have to use one of those weird little things.....

      (Looks into what you're referring to...) OH MY GOD... this thing is a phone TOO! This whole time I thought the expression "iPhone" was just like, some guy's name! Like, Daniel iPhone, or Todd iPhone, or perhaps Linda iPhone, because, you know... it COULD have been a lady...

      I am so blown away that you can like, TALK TO OTHER PEOPLE using these things! This whole time I just thought it was an MP3 and Podcast player that also had built into it a calculator, (regular AND scientific!,) a calendar, a mapping application, a text-message system, an email client, a camera, a flashlight, a spirit-level, a compass, a voice recorder, a note-taking and reminders application, a word processor, a spreadsheet, a presentation editor, a...

      --
      Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    12. Re:Does anyone have a good argument by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Because without DST it gets light at 430 in the morning and gets dark at 730. This negatively impacts utility bills. Move it forward one hour and you just saved a ton of carbon. Sure, if you don't give a shit about the planet we understand why you'd oppose DST.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    13. Re:Does anyone have a good argument by anegg · · Score: 1

      I have never met ANYONE that doesn't want that extra sunlight in the afternoon.

      I would vastly prefer that noon in my timezone was roughly balanced on average observed solar noon in the middle of the timezone so that sunlight would stay roughly balanced on either side of noon (except for the seasonal variation between mean solar time and observed solar time). I hate fighting my body's circadian rhythm to arise in the dark due to early onset/late departure DST. We haven't met, so that doesn't invalidate your argument, but please don't think that people who would prefer not having DST don't exist or don't understand what the consequences would be.

    14. Re:Does anyone have a good argument by anegg · · Score: 1

      please don't think that people who would prefer not having DST don't exist or don't understand what the consequences would be

      Here is visualization that shows the effects of solar variation throughout the year as well as the step-change created by DST https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/@7174408 (the link shows time/light for the city of Seattle - you can change it to your locale). Note that in March, when sunrise is at a comfortable 6:30 am, DST happens and pushes sunrise back to 7:30 am. In October, the switch back from DST doesn't happen until sunrise has been delayed until almost 8 am.

    15. Re:Does anyone have a good argument by toddestan · · Score: 1

      This has been studied multiple times and the energy savings, at best, are minor. It's not 1945 anymore, and we no longer use a significant fraction of our electricity just for lighting. In hot climates, it can even be counter-productive, as it's better if everyone is at the office later in the afternoon and you only have to keep one, large building cool than it is for everyone to go home during the heat of the day and crank up their home AC.

  4. Good idea but... by burhop · · Score: 1

    It seems there is a lot of software that automatically changes the time for you. It won't be Y2K but it will be interesting to hear what happens if everything doesn't get updated in time. It is hard enough doing meeting with people in Arizona at this time of the year but at least software like Outlook keep the times right.

  5. It's chronological nationalism at its worst! by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    Think of the history that will be wiped out when people in the future can't be sure what time something happened in the past.

    1. Re:It's chronological nationalism at its worst! by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      On any UNIX/GNU Linux (see what I did there?) terminal, ask it "cal 1752" and check out the entry for September. People roited to get those missing days back.

    2. Re:It's chronological nationalism at its worst! by mark_reh · · Score: 1

      Think of how many legal decisions are based on knowing a sequence of events. If you can't be sure what time something occured, you can't make good decisions. It's just one more way the far right is trying to destroy history.

    3. Re:It's chronological nationalism at its worst! by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      That's why you do all your time logging with UTC.

  6. Re:Wrong by nojayuk · · Score: 1

    Actually GMT is consistent and doesn't change. It's not UTC but it's close (insert smiley emoji here).

    Britain, the home of GMT is currently, at least for the next 12 hours or so, on British Summer Time (BST), an hour ahead of GMT and UTC. The "clocks go back" Sunday 28th October at 02:00 in the morning resulting in a return to us being on GMT.

  7. Re:Wrong by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 4, Informative

    GMT is *not* a reference time zone. It used to be decades ago, but since GMT is subject to DST like the rest of Europe, it no longer serves that purpose.

    Had you spent 30 seconds looking for a source to cite for this, you would have discovered you're simply wrong. Here are the actual facts, right from the horse's mouth:

    Greenwich Mean Time or GMT is the clock time at the Royal Observatory in Greenwich, London. It is the same all year round and is not affected by Summer Time or Daylight Saving Time .
    * * *
    GMT is also a time zone, used by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (UK) when Daylight Saving Time is not in use , from October to March.

    GMT is still widely used as the standard time against which all the other time zones in the world are referenced .

  8. Slippery slope by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

    Step 1: People working 8 am to 4 pm
    Step 2: Clocks shifted so that people start work 1 hour earlier wrt the sun, but still nominally 8-16
    Step 3: People getting tired in the mornings and gradually shifting their workday to 9-17
    Step 4: GOTO 1

    This is my issue with DST. Once you detach the definition of time from (suitably quantized) solar time, you lose all sense of reference. I'm OK with changing working schedules, but at least if you keep noon at 12, it's easier to see how things are changing. (Imagine changing the measures of length and weight willy-nilly just because some things feel too short or too fat.)

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    1. Re:Slippery slope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      High sun at noon splits daylight in half, requiring people to adjust their alarm clock to take advantage of an earlier sunrise.

      Instead of pinning 12 to high sun, we should pin 7(?) to sunrise.*

      This method maximizes daylight letting you wake up the same time everyday.

      Ideally, as most people get their time for their cell phones, "7" could be adjusted everyday to match the current sunrise. No one would notice a time change of a minute or two.

      * yes, i realize "7" would only be true for a specific location in each timezone, but that is how things are with our current midday/noon time.

      --XYZZY--

    2. Re:Slippery slope by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      but at least if you keep noon at 12

      What do you call noon? You talking the time when the sun is at its apex? Large portions of the world's populations don't feature this in their current time, not in summer, nor in winter if they actually change their clocks.

      If you want a reference, get a mechanical or electrical wristwatch and throw your sundial away.

    3. Re:Slippery slope by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Basically if it was beneficial to the economy, they would fiddle with hours, years, inches, you name it.

      Good point. I've also been thinking about Spinal Tap's "this one goes to eleven" as another analogy: it demonstrates a lack of understanding of amplifier technology. Each amplifier has a certain maximum level, and it doesn't change no matter how you divide the scale. Similarly, a lot of things in the real life are limited and you can only fool people so long by changing the measures.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  9. Re:Wrong by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

    (insert smiley emoji here).

    You mean :-)

  10. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They fell for an old troll trick.

    For any story, write a post with the subject "Wrong". Pick a fact from the summary that could plausibly be wrong, and then convincingly write that it is wrong.

    Try it, it works.

  11. Re:Wrong by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    GMT doesn't include DST changes, it's fixed and exactly the same as UTC.

    In the summer the UK goes on to BST, or British Summer Time, or GMT+1, or UTC+1. But GMT stays fixed.

    The main bit of ambiguity is that astronomers were using GMT to mean the period from noon to noon, so that all their observations from one night fell on the same date. That's pretty obscure though.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  12. Wish the USA would stop it also by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Stupid moving the clock around. In the agricultural days, farmers, that's all they did...farm. What difference did it make? NONE. it was all a con job, to "allow" people to have what they though was more free time after work to go do things. IE: spend money. The old Indian saying is best. "only white man would cut bottom from blanket, sew it on top and think he had longer blanket" Just put the clocks either on standard time or daylight savings time and LEAVE IT.

  13. No slippery slope by Solandri · · Score: 1

    The time change is done to keep sunrise around the same time (by the clock). So there is no GOTO 1 step because once you've shifted the clock so the start of the day coincides with sunrise, there's no need to shift the clock any further.

    If the common reference were noon (sun furthest overhead), there would be no issue. In winter sunrise would come a bit later, sunset a bit sooner. But people like to (or liked to in the past) start their day with sunrise. In winter this assures you have the maximum amount of the short daylight available. In summer it assures you don't waste any daylight when sunrise shifts to very early (by the clock).

    But in modern society, aside from a few agricultural jobs, the omnipresence of artificial lighting means there's little need to continue to do this. The only real argument for it I can think of is that you can guarantee at least one of the commute times (morning or evening) happens in the safety of daylight. Whereas if you keep the time synchronized around noon, in extreme northern latitudes both morning and evening commute would happen in darkness during winter. But the research I've seen says the time change itself is much more dangerous to people's health than the elevated risk of commuting in the dark.

    1. Re:No slippery slope by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      The time change is done to keep sunrise around the same time (by the clock).
      That is bollocks.
      First of all you can read up why DST was introduced ... and it has nothing to do with farmers.
      Secondly, if you looked at a globe and made your mind up, you would grasp what bollocks you just wrote.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  14. Re:Wrong by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    The UK have DST, yes. But that is not GMT.
    GMT is fixed ... like UTC. Read a book about it, it is to complicated to explain the difference between GMT and UTC in a /. post.

    Point is: you are wrong.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  15. If only Morocco had done this years ago by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Ugarte might still be alive, and Victor Laszlo might’ve had an easier time getting out of there.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  16. Right back at you by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    If you're going to come across so strong and authoritative it would help if you were actually right. Have some knowledge:

    GMT is a reference timezone linked to mean solar time.
    GMT does not have any daylight savings time.
    The UK does not use GMT, they use British Standard Time (BST) which includes Daylight savings (UTC+0 and UTC+1) depending on the time of the year.
    Despite the UK's standard time not being linked to GMT directly, some countries legally do reference GMT as their reference timezones.
    In the English language generally when not speaking scientifically then GMT and UTC are synonymous. https://en.oxforddictionaries....

  17. OH, the HUMANITY! by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    With this little warning just consider the confusion that this will cause. Computer systems with time changes programmed in; transport crossing international boundaries, eg a plane will leave France and timetabled to arrive at a certain (local Moroccan) time; diaries printed months ago and already on sale, etc. Did the political muppets think about this ? For anything like this 18 months is needed.

    Oh, the humanity! Whatever will people DO when their automatic systems briefly display the wrong time?!?

    Anything that operates internationally or trans-nationally should just be running off GMT/ZULU time anyway, so it shouldn't adversely impact that.

    As for what can the common Moroccan do on the ground about this horrific, nightmare situation in which their watches or clocks or computers briefly display an incorrect time of day... well, they could simply undo whatever change their automatic system made, et voila. Fixed.

    By the way, do you know what the prevalence is in Morocco of automatic time-keeping systems versus manual ones? Isn't it just possible that more people have to change their watches manually, and as word gets out, (hey, we're not doing that stupid twice-yearly clock and watch change ritual anymore!) and I'm pretty sure it will, they'll be talking about this over tea and coffee and very nearly everyone WILL get the message, I predict, that the change, even right before the event, will result in LESS confusion rather than more? I'm confident that most of these automatically changing systems can be configured NOT to automatically change, and if they can't, they really should be replaced.

    If the system cannot be fixed, then whoever made it should be fired for making a system that stupid; there's no excuse for that kind of incompetence in the modern day! Anything like that, however, I strongly suspect CAN be fixed, because this is 2018 and all the crap like that has long since been replaced with something created by people who exhibited basic fucking competency in programming. I hope the rest of the world follows the example set by Morocco, (a sentence I didn't think I'd ever write,) not in taking-over and occupying a neighboring country, but rather in abolishing the abject stupidity of changing clocks for what turned out to be no good goddamned reason twice a year.

    DOWN WITH THE STUPIDITY OF DST!

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    1. Re:OH, the HUMANITY! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Anything that operates internationally or trans-nationally should just be running off GMT/ZULU time anyway, so it shouldn't adversely impact that.
      So you want people who fly once in their lifetime to know that the plane at their airport is nodeparting 13:00 local time but at 13:00 ZULU? And you exoect them to calculate the correct time themselves?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:OH, the HUMANITY! by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

      Anything that operates internationally or trans-nationally should just be running off GMT/ZULU time anyway, so it shouldn't adversely impact that.
      So you want people who fly once in their lifetime to know that the plane at their airport is nodeparting 13:00 local time but at 13:00 ZULU? And you exoect them to calculate the correct time themselves?

      No. I want the airlines to do that internally. The airports should all just display the local time. Notice how in the original thing you're quoting and responding to part of, I wrote "AnyTHING" (emphasis added,) referring to the AIRLINE, not the traveler.

      The idea here is that the airport would (as I suspect they already do, esp. for an international flight,) operate on GMT/Z. My point was simply that NOT doing the change to/from DS time and announcing they're not right before the scheduled change, yes, is not the best way to do/handle that. BUT it's not a giant catastrophe, and while yes, they could/should have announced it in advance, or simply delayed the change (that is, to STOP changing,) to the next scheduled one, I suppose if the rationality is that the costs far outweigh the benefits, as they'd seem... then it would be hard to make the argument that they SHOULD delay it.

      The idea of what I was writing was that to freak out and demand they delay a minor change like this to the status quo, just because they didn't give very much lead-time, seems overblown and almost hysterical, hence the sarcastic "OH, the HUMANITY".

      --
      Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    3. Re:OH, the HUMANITY! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The idea here is that the airport would (as I suspect they already do, esp. for an international flight,) operate on GMT/Z.
      No, they operate on local time. What else would they do?

      People simply underestimate how complicated it is in real life to work in your head in a different time zone.

      The idea of what I was writing was that to freak out and demand they delay a minor change like this to the status quo, just because they didn't give very much lead-time, seems overblown and almost hysterical, hence the sarcastic "OH, the HUMANITY".
      For power companies such a "change of change" is a nightmare. Unscheduled even more so.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  18. MODS, YOU'VE BEEN TROLLED by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

    When I first replied nearly six hours ago, this nonsense had only attracted one reflexive "informative" mod.

    After I and five other people pointed out how parent is laughably, demonstrably incorrect (including actual supporting citations), it continued to get modded all the way to +5.

    Slashdot - half truth for nerds.

    Thanks for doing your part to keep that average low.