Slashdot Mirror


The Shutting Down of FilmStruck and the False Promise of Streaming Classics (newyorker.com)

The FilmStruck indie, arthouse and classic film subscription-streaming service will shut down next month, Turner and Warner Bros. Digital Networks announced this week. The New Yorker's film critic Richard Brody writes: The site isn't accepting any new subscribers, and it's a good bet that it won't be adding films, either. In the year and a half that I've been offering recommendations here of movies to stream, FilmStruck titles have featured prominently. One could keep busy, happy, and cinematically sustained for a long time on the sole basis of FilmStruck movies, and all the more so with the inclusion of movies from Turner Classic Movies. (The movie diet wouldn't be an entirely balanced one: the site does poorly with such domains as American independent filmmaking, African cinema, and the past forty years of film history. Its over-all flaw is its reliance on recognized classics: the programming of the site is more responsive than it is proactive, and it might have been improved by more personalized, idiosyncratic selections that would have made it more like a permanent online film festival.)

The site instead offered various modes of promotional outreach. Some, such as essays, and some home-produced videos, were significant works in themselves, but the site over all diluted its offerings with a home page of diversions and distractions that felt like a tawdry sampling of multiplex ballyhoo raising an unwelcome racket amid the art-house tranquillity. That conspicuously commercial waiting room to the classic-cinema library suggests the culture clash at the heart of the enterprise, the one that arises from its odd original fusion of Criterion with TCM, which was then a part of Time Warner -- and which foreshadowed its doom. That air of doom arises from more than the inherent conflicts of the high-culture outpost and the mass-market colossus.
Slate's arts and culture critic Joanna Scutts writes: FilmStruck did not care who you were: It set out to teach you something new, not just to feed you more helpings of what you already know you like. It employed a team of smart women and brought in directors like Barry Jenkins to record short, passionate introductions to films they loved. Its personality shone through tightly curated collections, from a timely gathering of all the previous incarnations of A Star Is Born, to a larger batch of Japanese horror titles, to deep dives into a particular director or cinematographer. It offered up inventive double-feature pairings and led you through its extensive archives in ways that were creative, cheeky, thought-provoking, and unpretentious. It made it clear that a passion for art-house and classic film was not exclusive to old white men. That kind of personality, that kind of discoverability, that kind of curation, can't be replicated by an algorithm. It takes time, money, and effort. It takes thought and education. It takes human beings.

125 comments

  1. EXCLUSIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "It made it clear that a passion for art-house and classic film was not exclusive to old white men"

    WHO CLAIMS THIS?

    1. Re:EXCLUSIVE by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      A few women and the overwhelmingly young white bearded men who champion them.

    2. Re:EXCLUSIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the world of tomorrow. After you take your thousand-year piss I'll teach you all about virtue signalling.

    3. Re:EXCLUSIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White people should die.

      That's what my (white male) professor at Columbia says.

    4. Re:EXCLUSIVE by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We showed that a woman could be President if there werent so many opposed to science and progress.

      A woman could be president if she was actually a good candidate. Hell, a halfway decent one could have beaten Trump. Not the first time I hear this notion that Hillary lost because "the US wasn't ready for a female president" or similar rubbish.

      I am with those who say "What the f... where the democrats thinking?". She lost because she was the poster child for much that more conservative voters and not a few progressive ones thought was wrong with politics today (calling them a basket of deplorables didn't help win them over, I am sure).

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:EXCLUSIVE by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      "It made it clear that a passion for art-house and classic film was not exclusive to old white men"

      WHO CLAIMS THIS?

      People who hate white men and want to downplay their accomplishments in any field, excise them from history, and steal any power they have for themselves?

      Just a guess.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:EXCLUSIVE by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not only that, but apparently they think Barack Obama didn't stand for "science and progress," since "so many" of us ignorant and racist/sexist/homohobe/blah blah Americans were perfectly fine with electing him to two terms.

      No, the fact that we didn't vote for a long-despised political player who was notorious for sucking up to corporate America, defending her #metoo husband, and who stole her nomination away from Bernie Sanders is just because we hate science and women. Yeah.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:EXCLUSIVE by elrous0 · · Score: 0

      Ever wonder why all of these white knights who keep complaining about white privilege don't voluntarily resign and let a Muslim lesbian women of color have *their* jobs? I guess they mean strip OTHER white males of their power, huh?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re: EXCLUSIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. You're sounding dumber with each word you type. No one cares what you think, if you voted for Trump you're a fucking moron child having a political tantrum. Fuck you and your retarded backwards ways.

    9. Re: EXCLUSIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Orange Man Bad!

    10. Re:EXCLUSIVE by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      "It made it clear that a passion for art-house and classic film was not exclusive to old white men"

      WHO CLAIMS THIS?

      I thought the same thing when I read this. I would venture to guess that of the people who frequent art houses and frequently watch classic films, the gender is predominately female (or females dragging their males along for the ride) but saying "passion for art-house and classic film was not exclusive to women" doesn't gain you any points in today's society.

    11. Re:EXCLUSIVE by west · · Score: 2

      > WHO CLAIMS THIS?

      Not certain whose claiming it, but I will say that almost every explainer I've watched (not a classic fan, but I watch occasionally), is an old white man, as am I.

      Not too surprising, since "authorities" such as would make it to air today are likely those who started 40 years ago, when things were much less diverse.

      It's only recently that we've started to care that authorities at least sort of match the audience demographically. This causes some discomfort as doing so requires fracturing the traditional requirements of decades of experience.

      It's why traditionally, young people who wanted to become authorities immediately had to enter fields that basically didn't exist decades ago, so that there was no old guard.

      The conflict is strongest in fields where the idea of long experience and demographically matching your audience are incompatible. Classic movies would certainly qualify.

    12. Re:EXCLUSIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yep, and they showed that they weren't going to vote for a poor candidate with baggage and flaws like Clinton BY VOTING SOMEONE ELSE IN WHO WAS EVEN WORSE.

    13. Re:EXCLUSIVE by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Clinton was the devil we knew. Trump was only a partly known entity, especially as a politician: how was he going to act, who was he going to take on as advisers, and was he actually going to listen to them? If you wanted a "different" politician, a new broom, then why not vote Trump, if you are willing to taking a gamble on just how he was going to be different? This turned out to be a terrible gamble, but that's 20/20 hindsight.

      If I actually had a vote in the election, in retrospect I would choose Hillary for sure. But at the time, not knowing what we now know, I would be hard pressed to say which candidate I'd prefer.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    14. Re: EXCLUSIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Trump supporter turned terrorist and sent pipebombs to people that Trump repeatedly attacked. A former Trump supporter attacked a synagogue and killed eleven people. A third person attacked and shot to death two people at a grocery store. This is after he tried to enter a church and kill people there. If he shows up in videos at a Trump rally, I would not be surprised.

      Is that too hard for you to understand?
      Let me explain it so that you can understand: Yes, orange man is bad.

    15. Re:EXCLUSIVE by neo-mkrey · · Score: 2

      Just your typical SJW, is who.

    16. Re:EXCLUSIVE by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      People who hate white men and want to downplay their accomplishments in any field, excise them from history, and steal any power they have for themselves?

      It's sad too really.

      I mean, it *was* largely a bunch of white guys that brought about western culture, economics, industry and technology and societies that we all live in and enjoy today.

      But I'm sure we'll eventually go all 1984 and rewrite them all out of history somehow, as that it just isn't popular today to acknowledge that fact.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    17. Re:EXCLUSIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How young can they possibly be if they are not only bearded, but their hair has gone white?

    18. Re:EXCLUSIVE by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Hillary is best understood not as a person, but as the instrument for the think tanks, Wall Street financiers and other connected insiders who want to embroil the United States in more illegal wars and plunder the country and its people even further.

      The problem for the Democrats and much of the Left today is they have to get votes off people who their own propaganda has taught them to despise.

      Hillary Clinton had Gaddafi sodomized to death in 2011, and then laughed about it later.

      "I think if Americans cared what celebrities thought then Hillary would be president but they clearly don't."
      -- White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    19. Re:EXCLUSIVE by houghi · · Score: 1

      I believe many people did not vote for Trump as much as they voted against the political establishment. They would have voted for that guy with a boot on his head if he would have run, no matter the party.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    20. Re:EXCLUSIVE by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I've said it before and I'l say it again. Trump is a terrible president but even with all his lying, racism, and poor economic polices he isn't half as bad as Hillary would have been.

      --
      âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
    21. Re:EXCLUSIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we didn't vote for a long-despised political player who was notorious for sucking up to corporate America, defending her #metoo husband, and who stole her nomination away from Bernie Sanders is just because we hate science and women

      instead, you voted for an asshole who is notorious for sucking up to corporate America, a #metoo husband who bragged about sexually assaulting women and cheated on every one of his waves, denies climate change, jumped on the anti-vax bandwagon.

      Yeah, if you voted for Trump, you hate science and women and black people and Mexicans and Jewish people and anyone else who isn't a rich, white man.

      "But is why I voted!", you say? Too fucking bad. You put your support into all his bigotry and hatred when you voted for him, so you get the same label, asshole.

    22. Re:EXCLUSIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, orange man bad!

    23. Re:EXCLUSIVE by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      it *was* largely a bunch of white guys that brought about western culture, economics, industry and technology and societies

      Well sure, when you enslave, kill, invade, repress, marginalise, and otherwise disempower everyone who isn't a white guy, that does rather leave the pitch open for the white guys to dominate!

  2. Too much video too little time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I haven't even finished watching "Black Mirror" on Netflix, or "The Motorhome Experiment" on Youtube, or any of the movies I have waiting to watch. I have video games that I bought, still in their shrink wrap because I didn't have time to play them. I always mean to go back to that excellent restaurant I ate at, but it will probably go out of business before I find the time to return to it. I'll probably end up watching the Incredibles 2 in some flight on a tiny screen in the back of the seat in front.

    Too many options to entertain in my time, and too little time for all the options.

    Classic Turner you say? Pass.

    1. Re:Too much video too little time by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Being old sucks. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  3. Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never thought you could fit so many dog whistles and virtue signals into a single Slashdot summary. It's a wonderful achievement in its own accord.

    1. Re:Amazing by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I've seen Polygon articles with less pretentious virtue-signalling. And that's saying something.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  4. In the long run, all streaming is ephemeral by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This really goes to show the weakness of streaming. Sometimes a company is streaming exactly what you want, and owns the content - but will just decide to shut down that access anyway because they don't see quite enough profit in it.

    That is why, even though it seems like madness these days, I still prefer to buy a handful of movies I really want to see again off and on.

    You can even imagine some distant future where a corporate AI conglomerate that takes over Netflix vanishes some Netflix original content you enjoyed, for some inscrutable reason...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:In the long run, all streaming is ephemeral by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can even imagine some distant future where a corporate AI conglomerate that takes over Netflix vanishes some Netflix original content you enjoyed, for some inscrutable reason...

      I'll be zapped for this, but fine: Disney and The Song of the South. Findable, but basically gone. I understand Disney bought all of the available copies and buried it, intending for it never to be released again. Fantasia? There are a couple of Framing Improvements in the current release. And we won't even talk about the "improvements" to Star Wars from the original 1977? release. (Han shot first. And: Star Trek TMP3: Keep Spock Dead.)

      Also, there are some cartoons which I remember fondly which are now "culturally insensitive". I thought cartoons were supposed to be a caricature of reality. I loved the two hopping minor birds and the little boy always chasing them. (AKA the Coyote?)

      My mom loved Little Black Sambo -- she though he was so ingenious climbing the tree and letting the tigers turn to butter.

      Oh, and there's Polock jokes (I told one today as a matter of fact), there's Blond Jokes which I used to collect (Do you know why a Blond Woman had bruises by her belly button? Gurer ner Oybaq zra, gbb.) and Black and White and Asian and Eskimo and English and American jokes as well.

      In an old popular Nature/Science show, The Undersea World of Jacques Cousteau, I understand JC used cattle-prods and such to make the animals do what he wanted on demand for the camera. I understand he thought it was better to coerce a few animals in order for people to understand the species in general. Now-a-days those shows would probably be burned as heresy. Oh, and if I got it right here, That Terrible Evil Person is also the inventor of scuba, as in underwater scuba gear.

      Having things online is extremely handy. But like all important things, you need multiple copies in your possession or you DON'T actually have them.

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    2. Re:In the long run, all streaming is ephemeral by Calydor · · Score: 2

      People don't understand caricatures anymore, and I am not sure what happened to change that. Now everything is taken as literal truth, offhand remarks are thought to have been planned and meticulously worded over the course of years with no possibility of using imprecise words or terms.

      It is the Age of Offense, where people seem to only be truly happy if they've discovered at least two new ways of being offended every day.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    3. Re:In the long run, all streaming is ephemeral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Oh, and there's Polock jokes (I told one today as a matter of fact),"

      Do you know the origin of these? During WWI, it suddenly became not so popular to be German in the US. Looking at the records of Baby Names of that era, such names as Gertrude, Hilda, and Bertha plummeted in popularity. Percolating out of German-American resentment of being thought cruel, what with all of the raping of Belgian Nuns and the sinking of the Lusitania and all, were Polack and Hunkie/Honkie jokes. Germans may be cruel, but the Polish and Hungarians, and by the way, all Jews, simply weren't Human at all. This was their means of deflection; German humor was never very subtle.
      Three decades later, the German-American Bundt tried this again to even less effect, and their leaders, such as a certain Fred Trump, decided to keep on the down low during the duration to the end of what their Aryan Masters had started, back in 1914.

      Now the funny thing is, on TV recently is the German series "Turkish For Beginners". It's actually funny, and perceptive, and gentle, and very funny. But this may be an anomaly. Turks in the German economy may prove even more problematical in the future, than the Jews that they replaced had been in the past.

    4. Re:In the long run, all streaming is ephemeral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not inscrutable reasons, it's the Disney strategy -- pull crap out of circulation for a few years so you can reintroduce it again with "expanded features" like another 12 seconds in one of the scenes. Rinse and repeat.

    5. Re:In the long run, all streaming is ephemeral by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      I'll be zapped for this, but fine: Disney and The Song of the South. Findable, but basically gone. I understand Disney bought all of the available copies and buried it, intending for it never to be released again. Fantasia? There are a couple of Framing Improvements in the current release.

      Not true about Song Of The South. The film exists. Disney actually restored it a few years ago. The reason you can't see it is that the restoration was shown to Bob Iger and he said something like his successor could put it out if he/she wanted to, but he wasn't going to touch it. But it is ready to go and could, in theory, come out in the future. For those who don't know, it doesn't even take place during the time of slavery (it's set in the 1870s or 1880s) but it's become a victim to white people who afraid that African Americans are going to revolt if it comes out. I have my doubts that most African Americans care about the film one way or the other, but we live in an age where young people of all races are convinced that cultural appropriation is real and Iger simply doesn't want to deal with any potential backlash on his watch. I haven't heard about Disney buying up copies, but it was never released on DVD and the VHS tapes and the Japanese laserdisc are both long out of print because those are dead formats.

      Fantasia is complete now, but a small number of seconds during the Pastoral Symphony sequence have been reframed to remove the (now) culturally inappropriate character named Sunflower. The late Roy O. Disney (Walt's nephew and Roy's son) said that the film was simply never going to be released with Sunflower visible again. Some of the introductory talking sequences by Deems Taylor have lost their original soundtrack so while the video exists, Disney decided to hire a voice actor to redo all the narration so it would be consistent. So the talking sequence videos are now fully restored and have been in the most recent reissue but it doesn't feature the actual original audio.

    6. Re:In the long run, all streaming is ephemeral by magusxxx · · Score: 1

      And yet only a few years ago I saw Birth Of A Nation on DVD, with a box cover showing a Klansman on a horse, on the shelves of a Best Buy.

      And let's not forget Cartoon Network. They supposedly had a shelf section which was labeled, "Never to be broadcasted."

      --
      Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    7. Re:In the long run, all streaming is ephemeral by tepples · · Score: 1

      "A few years" under Disney's moratorium strategy is usually 7 years. How long has it been since the last home video release of Song of the South?

    8. Re:In the long run, all streaming is ephemeral by houghi · · Score: 1

      I am a blond man, you incensitive clod.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    9. Re:In the long run, all streaming is ephemeral by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      People don't understand caricatures anymore, and I am not sure what happened to change that. Now everything is taken as literal truth, offhand remarks are thought to have been planned and meticulously worded over the course of years with no possibility of using imprecise words or terms.

      It is the Age of Offense, where people seem to only be truly happy if they've discovered at least two new ways of being offended every day.

      People do, it's just that caricatures and other things like satire require thinking and effort in order to be understood. Problem is, US culture shuns intelligence in favor for brute strength. It's not even "let's make fun of nerds" it's an active shunning of even trying to be knowledgeable, Intelligence is seen as a negative - to be well read, or worldly is seen as something to be avoided.

      Ignorance is king, and thinking (not even critical thinking) is something that should be avoided at all costs. Likewise, anything that requires higher thought (like complex humor vehicles like caricatures and satire) is more effort than what US culture expects. If you can't resolve things without shooting things up with guns, then it's not worth doing.

      It's the celebration of id over ego. To be dumb is to be king. Lazy in thought is smart. Learning is uncool.

    10. Re:In the long run, all streaming is ephemeral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This...this hits the nail on the head. Agree 110% because even 100% is no longer enough

    11. Re:In the long run, all streaming is ephemeral by ortholattice · · Score: 1

      I typed " Gurer ner Oybaq zra, gbb" into Google translate thinking it might detect rot13 (it doesn't). Instead, it detected Bengali, with the translation "Grab the web of molasses, ga". No idea where the "ga" came from.

    12. Re:In the long run, all streaming is ephemeral by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      It's usually the nerd types that ignore context, think caricatures real, and let words get to them like a physical beating.

    13. Re:In the long run, all streaming is ephemeral by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      I say nerd types because that's how reddit and tumblr and most other internet spots see themselves. As more intelligent than others and usually overly aggressive toward mostly pointless things.

  5. If there's a lesson to be learned here... by trudyscousin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...it's to buy and own your own media.

    Don't misunderstand me. This service sounds like something to which I'd have subscribed, had I known about it. I have no idea why the service shut down, but you can bet it was due to licensing arrangements and the like. All you know is that you are now deprived of something valuable.

    I know that streaming is the shit right now, and that guys like me who still buy audio and video discs and run their own home media servers are viewed as retrogrades. On the other hand, I'm not subject to the caprices of those who run those services, or those who cause those services to be shut down. I get to watch La Jetee any time I like.

    Here's hoping FilmStruck comes back, or something even better replaces it.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, write technology blogs.
    1. Re:If there's a lesson to be learned here... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I’m like you - if I like a movie enough that I’ll want to see it again, I buy it. And if I’d have known about this service, I’d certainly have subscribed. But overall the golden age of movie access is over.

      For a number of years, Netflix was the perfect service for us. We put together a queue of all the movies that we wanted to watch, and Netflix pretty much had them all on DVD. We kept plugging away at the queue, which despite our best efforts somehow managed to keep growing as we added new releases and whatnot. 99% of the time we’d watch one of the movies, and whether we liked it or not, had no plans to watch it again. The other 1% we might buy right away, or it might get added to a birthday or Christmas list.

      But as Netflix has moved on to streaming and then to focusing on their own content, their catalog has degraded horribly. Seems like a quarter of our DVD queue is “long wait” or “availability unknown”. Our streaming queue is less than half what it was three years ago. I can’t remember the last time we added something to the queue. We are still subscribed mainly because my wife won’t agree to stop... but she doesn’t seem to watch much either.

      Anyway, I realize that’s all tangential at best to this story, except to again demonstrate that the initial promise of the internet to us movie lovers has mostly fizzled out - this is just another example. Maybe it’s what the old guys running the studios had planned, all along.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:If there's a lesson to be learned here... by aberglas · · Score: 1

      It is indeed interesting that streaming and the promise of the internet has actually reduced the availability of legal content. The video store had more than Netflix.

      I am surprised that the independents do not get together and create a site.

    3. Re:If there's a lesson to be learned here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We put together a queue of all the movies that we wanted to watch...

      And you could at least arrange your queue if I remember correctly. I forget what else you could do with it. It's amazing that you have this list of movies and really can't do much with it as a list. Or even create additional lists.

    4. Re:If there's a lesson to be learned here... by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Well you can still buy streams from ITunes or Amazon Video, it just doesn't seem like a good value for $2 or $4 when you pay $7 for a month of streaming the free stuff, whereas that would've been fine for a rental back in the day. Perception of the economics has changed.

    5. Re:If there's a lesson to be learned here... by AsylumWraith · · Score: 1

      I know that streaming is the shit right now, and that guys like me who still buy audio and video discs and run their own home media servers are viewed as retrogrades.

      I just finished setting up a NAS/DLNA server for my home. Spent close to two months ripping my entire CD and DVD collections, and "acquiring" everything else that I had bought on digital or have on VHS/vinyl, (which isn't so hard in the case of music, which is downloadable DRM-free from Apple and Amazon, where I bought a fair amount of stuff. The movies, well, that was different.)

      Going forward, I'm planning on either buying physical CDs, or more likely, DRM-free downloadables for music, and the "Disc+Digital" packages from the store for movies, (Ultraviolet content shows up in my Vudu account, which is very convenient, even compared to the DLNA server in my opinion, but I'll still rip the Blu-Ray to the server as a backup.)

    6. Re:If there's a lesson to be learned here... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      But as Netflix has moved on to streaming and then to focusing on their own content, their catalog has degraded horribly. Seems like a quarter of our DVD queue is “long wait” or “availability unknown”. Our streaming queue is less than half what it was three years ago. I can’t remember the last time we added something to the queue. We are still subscribed mainly because my wife won’t agree to stop... but she doesn’t seem to watch much either.

      Anyway, I realize that’s all tangential at best to this story, except to again demonstrate that the initial promise of the internet to us movie lovers has mostly fizzled out - this is just another example. Maybe it’s what the old guys running the studios had planned, all along.

      You might want to check Amazon. Even sticking to what's included in Prime, it's a vast quirky catalog, with more than I could ever watch.

    7. Re:If there's a lesson to be learned here... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I just finished setting up a NAS/DLNA server for my home.

      We’ve got an old 2006 MacBook Pro we use for this purpose. It doesn’t take much horsepower to stream video, and it sure makes finding the movie you want to watch a lot easier when you don’t have to dig through a couple hundred DVD/Blu-Ray cases sitting on a shelf somewhere!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    8. Re:If there's a lesson to be learned here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, the collective hunch in relevant forums, based on public statements by CEOs and the like, is that ATT-Warner is poised to release a streaming service to compete with Netflix, and Amazon Prime. The sentiment from ATT-Warner is that smaller streaming services need to be shed to consolidate efforts, and to monetize subscriber information, which requires as much data as possible on subscribers (this is from statements by ATT-Warner execs, not rumors on forums). Basically, Filmstruck was seen as taking away effort and resources from the one-service-to-rule them all from ATT, and as splintering data gathering efforts across platforms. I.e., if you're going to monetize viewing habits, etc. it's easier to do that if you coerce everyone to be on the same platform.

      Licensing has nothing to do with it.

    9. Re:If there's a lesson to be learned here... by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      The video store had more than Netflix.

      I am surprised that the independents do not get together and create a site.

      There's a few problems going on:

      -Content creators are deciding they want a larger piece of the pie, and pulling content from Netflix with the hope that people will spend another $10 per month on another video streaming service. I want to spend it for all my content, I'm not going to pay $10/month for one show I want to watch.

      -At Blockbuster I could wander the aisles in different categories and see the entire selection. With Netflix, even though it claims to have a catalog of ~4000 movies and ~1000 TV shows, they seem to insist on recommending the same 5 shows to me. Sometimes in multiple categories. For the love of god I don't want to watch Big Mouth! I have to get recommendations from friends to find something useful. So much for their AI engine.

    10. Re:If there's a lesson to be learned here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rights holders are the ones pulling stuff from Netflix, not Netflix themselves. Disney and other companies see more money in making their own streaming services then working with Netflix.

      Netflix making its own original content is the right answer for them. They need something to keep people around. Something they own that can't be pulled from them. It is the right move and something Amazon Video is doing as well (see The Expanse).

  6. Who? by ChoGGi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They had better advertising when closing down then any other time, I probably would've signed up if I'd known.

    1. Re:Who? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Being an exclusive hipster service nobody has heard of grants more status than allowing in the unwashed masses.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it appears garnering status with hipsters isn't actually a viable business plan. Who would'a thunk it.

  7. Tells You Their Priorities by Kunedog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Obsession with skin color is a red flag, and probably means they're willing to sacrifice quality to satisfy it. It's very likely that nothing of value was lost here.

  8. The truth of it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The truth of it is that the site was propaganda. Movies selected by the left and anything that the elitist left don't like won't be shown.

    1. Re: The truth of it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name one right wing movie that is actually, objectively, good... I'll wait...

      Yeah, those movies that show the virtues of the establishment and status quo are sooooooo interesting. *eye roll*

    2. Re: The truth of it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Right wing movie themes:

      1) Boy isn't the world a better place when the letter of the law trumps reason?
      2) Rich and powerful men exploit working people and it's amazing.
      3) The police protect a community of white people from immigrants getting uppity and trying to carve out a life anywhere, "please just anywhere they can have a quiet life."
      4) The elderly realize theyâ(TM)re a burden on society and we choose to starve them off all resources unless they go back to work or were rich.
      5) Let's make sure we stack the odds in our favor so the minority stay in power in a supposed democracy.
      6) Let's all get together so that people who live kinda weird private lives can't do it in a public way. Ideally by putting them in jail, but lefitimizing being a dick to them is a good option too.
      7) GUNS! In the hands of every citizen, especially children!
      8) Why chasing profit is more socially responsible than human rights, FTW.
      9) I got to the end of my life and I am sooooo glad I worked my ass off and ignored my family.

    3. Re: The truth of it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      10) I used to think love was the answer, but I realized war as sanctioned by the military industrial complex was more effective.
      11) I'm so glad the courts are biased against weird people and people who look weird, scary, different and poor.
      12) Life is better when people just know their place and acknowledge there's no point in trying to go against the established norm.
      13) Bully: The bully in school was right to bully me. Iâ(TM)m a real loser.
      14) Bully 2: That rich kid really was genetically superior
      15) Bully 3: And his kids are better than mine.
      16) The United States takes over Mexico, China and why not Canada too, for fun, profits and peace on earth at the end of a gun and 24/7 surveillance.
      17) Women really do deserve less pay for a lot of obvious reasons.
      18) America is awesome, because it's stolen from Native people most of whom have been killed in a genocide long forgotten and it's so so good. They were, like basically animals anyway.

    4. Re: The truth of it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conan the Barbarian is as conservative as it gets and it's fucking good.

    5. Re: The truth of it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole Lord of the Rings trilogy.

    6. Re: The truth of it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sometimes people who are over educated but lack any depth may see many movies as right wing radical - we can start with '300' - nationalistic and militaristic pigs defending their country from multiculturalism. Braveheart? Man - the main guy was as right wing radical as they come and the director and actor playing main roles were as right wing as they come too. Apocalyptica - even better - we know that Indians never oppressed and slaughtered each other. Ooooops I used the wrong word or? These were not Indians. Man how easy it is to out oneself as right wing old white man...... I think we can better just leave it at that. Never ending saga of Star Wars is a fight between forces of order (empire) and unorder (republic) both use extreme violence and the only good thing about them is that they both fail to achieve absolute dominance. The rebels looks better tho I admit. I suppose to avoid confusion as to what side is 'good'. I think the problem is right here - you can re-interpret any work of art. In fact you can leave it for people to discuss this. If a work is good it will be so multilayered that you cannot simply say it is right/left wing. You just need brains and open mind. Language w/o bans on vocabulary would also be good.

    7. Re: The truth of it is. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Name one right wing movie that is actually, objectively, good... I'll wait...

      Well, by the standards of the modern left, pretty much all movies made by a white male are now verboten. So, almost every English-speaking movie ever made?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re: The truth of it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re: The truth of it is. by BytePusher · · Score: 1

      Oh, is that the one where he protects the reputation of the justice system by showing it was unbiased and justly convicted a black man 25 years ago?

    10. Re: The truth of it is. by BytePusher · · Score: 1

      A diverse group of nature loving creatures puts down their differences and follow a gay wizard to fight power hungry authoritarian monsters? I'm not sure right wing means what you think it means...

    11. Re: The truth of it is. by BytePusher · · Score: 1

      I watched that as a child, but all I remember about it was Arnold sweating a lot... How is it right wing?

    12. Re: The truth of it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything John Milius does is conservative. And thank goodness for it. Individualism, strong men, even stronger women and lots of righteous, bloody, meaty, gorgeous ultraviolence. With some surf throw in to add awesomeness to awesomeness, by Crom!

    13. Re: The truth of it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tolkien was a devout Catholic and that is as conservative as one can be. Part of what is awesome about LOTR is that while you can pick up the clues about the author's philosophy, he was confident enough about his own faith to not feel the need to ram it down everybody's throat.

    14. Re: The truth of it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being against authoritarianism (or a potential cruel dictatorship) isn't "left" or "right".

    15. Re: The truth of it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, is by definition preservation of the status quo, and is uncritical of the establishment. I do realize both Democrats and Republicans share these characteristics.

  9. THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES KEN DOLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES KEN DOLL YOU DISHONEST NAZI FAGGOT

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING. Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  10. "It employed a team of smart women" by bistromath007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've never even heard of it before today, but I still know exactly what happened to it.

    1. Re:"It employed a team of smart women" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, another homosexual with 007 in their name. Odd coincidence.

    2. Re:"It employed a team of smart women" by Zocalo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've never heard of it either, which is almost certainly exactly why it is now folding, regardless of the makeup of its leadership team. Still, that's a really crap turn of phrase from Joanna Scutts at Slate, who probably needs to either think a little more about what she's writing or get a better editor. Clearly, since the company is apparently folding, these "smart women" can't actually have been all that smart since they failed to come up with a sustainable business model, because I highly doubt that she's suggesting the alternative; that even a group of the smartest of women are not actually capable of running a successful company.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    3. Re:"It employed a team of smart women" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Still, that's a really crap turn of phrase from Joanna Scutts at Slate, who probably needs to either think a little more about what she's writing or get a better editor."

      Didn't you get the memo ? Manhate isn't sexism.

    4. Re:"It employed a team of smart women" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Still, that's a really crap turn of phrase from Joanna Scutts at Slate, who probably needs to either think a little more about what she's writing or get a better editor."

      Didn't you get the memo ? Manhate isn't sexism.

      Diversity isn't panacea.

    5. Re:"It employed a team of smart women" by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt that she's suggesting the alternative; that even a group of the smartest of women are not actually capable of running a successful company.

      Nope. She'll just blame the evil white male patriarchy for any failings.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:"It employed a team of smart women" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, they should have hired Asians instead of women. You can't just wake up one day and decide to be Asian.

    7. Re:"It employed a team of smart women" by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Why can't a professional woman over 30 play hide and seek?

      Because nobody will look for her.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  11. Great examples by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    I don't know why you think you would be zapped, those are all excellent examples (especially Song of the South!).

    A company has the right and means to bury something if they so choose, but if you have a real copy yourself you can play (and better duplicate to back up) then future waves of madness hold little power over your entertainment.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Great examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A company has the right and means to bury something if they so choose

      That is debatable.

      When it comes to movies they fall under copyright and there is a reason we have those laws.
      If a company uses copyright to make sure that no-one has copies of the work and then destroys it just before it enters public domain to make sure that it doesn't compete with their newer work then we need to question if they should be allowed to use copyright at all.

      If there were no such thing as copyright then yes, they should have the right and means to bury something if they choose.

  12. Re:THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES KEN DO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was once a time when literal retards were not welcome on Slashdot. But now you're here.

  13. Re:THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES KEN DO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES KEN DOLL YOU DISHONEST NAZI FAGGOT

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING. Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  14. THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES KEN DOLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES DISHONEST NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING. Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  15. Racist. by thesupraman · · Score: 2

    I say 'Congratulations, you have just proven yourself to be racist, and sexist', and I'm not even white.

    BTW, you continue to live in America - so stop trying to signal virtue, its like smoking a cigar while explaining to children how to live healthy..

    1. Re:Racist. by houghi · · Score: 1

      "Do not smoke a cigars, like I do. It is unhealthy and you will die sooner if you do."
      Mmm. Not that hard, so I am not sure what your point is.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  16. There is an alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though it doesn't carry the criterion collection, mubi.com has a similar rotating carefully curated art film selection with bonuses, and will fill some of the gap -- and for those who hadn't heard of FilmStruck before this shutdown may be a good place to start.

    1. Re:There is an alternative by magusxxx · · Score: 1

      I was surprised I liked that site. Same goes for the youtube channel Omeleto. They post short films every so often from a variety of genres. Many times they're hit or miss. But that's what I like about it. It's nice to see if someone is trying to do something different.

      --
      Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
  17. Every film critic is an armchair businessman by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    (The movie diet wouldn't be an entirely balanced one: the site does poorly with such domains as American independent filmmaking, African cinema, and the past forty years of film history. Its over-all flaw is its reliance on recognized classics: the programming of the site is more responsive than it is proactive, and it might have been improved by more personalized, idiosyncratic selections that would have made it more like a permanent online film festival.)

    Well, Richard, why don't you start up your own fucking streaming site then? I mean, since you think that adding all of that is so fucking easy. I'm sure you'll make a goddamned fortune.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  18. Get woke, go broke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It employed a team of smart women...

  19. Horrible marketing by indytx · · Score: 2

    Granted, I spend zero time looking for the next cool thing, but I had never heard of this service before, and I probably would have subscribed had I known about it. My kids are too young to watch some of my favorite movies from when I was a child, but so many of the classics that used to be shown on Turner Classic Movies are appropriate for many ages, and those films are not available on Netflix or Amazon. Looking at the comments, the management completely missed an entire category of film buffs. More "old white men" subscribing to the service might have kept it afloat. I bet they had interesting advertising algorithms.

    --
    Make love, not reality television.
    1. Re:Horrible marketing by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      They probably did something silly and advertised it on CBS reruns of Big Bang Theory instead of social media. Between not watching broadcast TV or listening to broadcast radio, using ad blockers and subscribing to advertising-free streaming sources, you probably need a deft hand to advertise this sort of thing to the target audience anyway, and deep pockets for their word of mouth to get you to critical mass.

    2. Re:Horrible marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, see, this is why I don't feel that ads are inherently evil. Ideally, they would be a way to let potential customers know you exist.

      However, the way ads are done now, often is evil.

  20. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do I only hear about a lot of cool-sounding online services when the notice comes across Slashdot that they are shutting down? It happens all the flaming time.

    1. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the time or are you thinking of all the time Google does it?

  21. I resent by Sqreater · · Score: 1, Troll

    I resent the use of the phrase "old white men" - a tryptych of abuse- to describe something you don't like. Hyper-liberal women really push women's privilege when they use this odious combination to describe men. They don't expect to be taken as hypocrites.

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
    1. Re:I resent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I resent the use of the phrase "old white men" - a tryptych of abuse- to describe something you don't like. Hyper-liberal women really push women's privilege when they use this odious combination to describe men. They don't expect to be taken as hypocrites.

      After reading what she wrote, I was glad to hear that this business she liked so much is folding.

      Perhaps if she didn't see everything through her sex and race colored glasses, she'd have a clearer view of the world.

    2. Re:I resent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I expect that we'll see more of this in the future with companies focusing on diversity and inclusion, and focusing less on business models and making money.

  22. It employed a team of smart women

    It made it clear that a passion for art-house and classic film was not exclusive to old white men.

    Gee, with an approach like that, how could it fail????

  23. TCM + Criterion Collection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sad to see my subscription end. Very high quality films without ads. Some complained about streaming problems, but I never had any.
    The reason: owner TimeWarner is going into the Hulu business and doesn't want any competition from itself. I quit cable and got Filmstruck because I was spending most of my time on TCM anyway and Google Fiber was gigging me on the TV bill again.

    1. Re:TCM + Criterion Collection by UsuallyReasonable · · Score: 1

      I too am very sad to see them go.

  24. FilmStruck isn't the only service shutting down. by WareVonWolf · · Score: 1

    AT&T and Warner Bros also pulled the plug on a service called DramaFever that showed Korean dramas without any warning what so ever. When I found out they shut down that service, I was so upset! That was my escape from everyday life. Those scumbags have gained my animosity and I won't be buying or watching anything from them.

  25. Excellent point by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    When it comes to movies they fall under copyright and there is a reason we have those laws.

    That is a great point, after the expiration of copyright I agree that a company no longer has the right (moral or otherwise) to bury something... of course that means someone elsewhere has to have kept the material to release it, but at least they can...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  26. What a bizarre summary by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 1

    It made what could have been an article about streaming services, how they are managed and advertised, became a SJW discussion.

  27. But are we missing much? by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    Old guy here, I have seen pretty much every old movie so there's not much missing for me. No need to watch Ben Hur or Singing In The Rain three times a month. Now what would interest me are old movies ***rarely*** shown if any. If want to watch Diana Dors and Mamie Van Doren movies, probably buy the DVD. Trudyscousin posted about buy your own discs which many perceive as retrogrades but with your own media you have control.

    Regarding old movies, back in the 1950s there were several major movie studios and something like 400 movies per year were produced. I'm sure many were stinkers but there probably some films that if were seen again probably be highly acclaimed. I think many of those films are long gone due to deterioration. If film still good, it could be the copyright owner still demands huge sum of money to have it broadcasted (note that copyrights never expire i.e. Mickey Mouse court rulings). But then there's some renegades out there that taped on VHS back in 1980s when TV stations showed old movies late at night. Occasionally someone will post on a list videotape copy for sale.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  28. What an utter load of crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew DJT was a deplorable POS the moment he announced his candidacy. And he did nothing but enforce my conclusions about him.

  29. Hollywood Wanted it Shut Down by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    The real reason it's shutting down because Hollywood doesn't want the new generations to see the old movies in order to compare them to the crap the studios put out today.

  30. I resemble that remark! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being an old white having 3 girlfriends (with benefits) in their mid 20's mostly because men (boys) their age are jerks. And I'm not. I win.

  31. They like your drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah yeah yeah, we know the reason they ACTUALLY hang around is because your old ass has a steady hydro prescription, but keep telling yourself it's cause you're a "real man".

  32. Yes, we lost a lot! was:But are we missing much? by croftj · · Score: 1

    As an old white guy I can say I enjoyed watching movies from around the world and that spanned the generations. I had at least 1 more year of serious mining of their collection, maybe longer as they kept adding new stuff.

    As for buying watching movies, I found I don't watch many movies more than one or twice. Some I do, but those are definitely the minority. FilmStruck was a great resource. I hope someone else will pick up the banner once they are gone!

    --
    -- Many men would appreciate a woman's mind more if they could fondle it
  33. My drug of choice is being nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Helps a lot, you know.

  34. Moviestory by princenocturne2017 · · Score: 1

    Granted, I spend zero time looking for the next cool thing, but I had never heard of this service before, and I probably would have subscribed had I known about it. My kids are too young to watch some of my favorite movies from http://trichejeuxmobiles.onlin...