Slashdot Mirror


Snap CEO Hired Chief Business Officer, Then Changed His Mind (bloomberg.com)

According to a report from Bloomberg, citing people familiar with the matter, Snap CEO Evan Spiegel officially made Kristen O'Hara, former longtime WarnerMedia/Time Warner exec, the chief business officer of Snap, but changed his mind two days later. Spiegel decided to hire Jeremi Gorman, who oversaw ad sales at Amazon, instead. "The switch was jarring for Snap's sales division, as O'Hara was well-liked," Bloomberg reports. "Now she's gone." From the report: In a statement to employees Monday, O'Hara told colleagues she is leaving due to changes in team structure. Even if Gorman works well in the role, the incident has eroded trust in Spiegel's decision-making as he is working to improve his leadership skills, and as Snap is depending on new managers to help boost the company's performance. Snap confirmed O'Hara's departure and declined to comment on the circumstances. In an email to the business solutions team on Monday, provided by Snap, Spiegel praised her leadership. Spiegel wrote: "In her time here, Kristen had an immediate and positive impact on the company. She had a deep understanding of our business from the outset and forged strong client relationships that we will continue to build upon. I will miss the leadership and enthusiasm she brought to the organization and wish her only continued success. Jeremi joins us with proven expertise and talent that will make our platform even better for our partners, and I am excited to have her on our team."

83 comments

  1. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares?

  2. Why is this on slashdot? It's meaningless drivel. Who cares who is hired/fired to "manage"? It's not relevant to the success of the company. The people on the ground will be who makes things succeed or not. How is this, "Stuff that matters?"

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this on slashdot? It's meaningless drivel.

      Why are you on slashdot? 95% of your posts are meaningless drivel, which is why you don't even get the karma bonus.

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why should anyone care what a 3.5 million, 7 digit UID newfag thinks?

    3. Re: Why? by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

      Hey man, enjoy reading the stuff you post. Just a friendly word of advice. You're a pretty professional dude, don't bother feeding the crab bucket.

      You'll always end up getting clipped and then ask yourself, "Why am I playing with a crab?"

    4. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really? You enjoy reading the stuff a troll posts? This isn't "BeauHD", the slashdot editor, this is "BeauHD (5555555)" the troll.

    5. Re:Why? by JackieBrown · · Score: 2

      The people on the ground will be who makes things succeed or not. How is this, "Stuff that matters?"

      The you can submit the next story on how your neighbor just got hired for that data entry position an snapchat so we can get those "people on the ground" stories that you want/

  3. News for nerds... by Shaitan · · Score: 1

    What does this have to do with technology or nerdy news?

    1. Re:News for nerds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CEO can make those calls. Whodafuck other than shareholders gives a flying fuck?

    2. Re:News for nerds... by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      I doubt shareholders even really give a damn about internal politics like this. It sounds like somebody who liked her in the back office gossips with the other girls over lunch about it. Middle management actually runs the company, other executives exist to be fall guys if something bad happens and to nod, smile, and act like they are giving serious considerations to matters while ignoring the complaints of the upper branches of middle management.

    3. Re:News for nerds... by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What does this have to do with... nerdy news?

      "Pointy-haired boss makes hare-brained decision, even the sales team is upset."

      "ha-ha"

    4. Re:News for nerds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Valley Wag was a pretty damned popular site before it was Thieled. It probably got more traffic than /. has in a decade.

    5. Re:News for nerds... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      What's that, the new geocities?

  4. Who? by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

    What the heck is "Snap"?

    1. Re:Who? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 2

      It's the company formerly known as Snapchat.

    2. Re:Who? by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh the app people use to send naked pictures to each other. Why do they need a Business Officer?

    3. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't. Which is why they went slumming with someone formerly of Amazon.

    4. Re: Who? by reanjr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Probably because no one ever came up with a business model.

    5. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO a snapchat is called snapchat, Snap is an Ubuntu application that comes inside of a virtual kernel.

    6. Re:Who? by _merlin · · Score: 1

      Snap used to be a printing business that's moved into website design as the market has shifted: https://www.snap.com.au/

    7. Re:Who? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      It is the new fad style of tap-dancing that is popular with what the youngest generation is called this week.

    8. Re: Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just playing with fire. It should at least wear a condom.

    9. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a type of clothing faster, like a button

  5. Platform, partners ... what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Partners, Snap has partners?

    Forget that, Span has more than 3 people, and is in need of leadership?

    No, forget that - Snap has a sales division? Lol, what are they selling - your personal information, sliced and diced made to order?
    Because really, what is the product that Snap has?

  6. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    , but changed his mind two days later.

    ...

    Kristen had an immediate and positive impact on the company.

    Did I miss something? How on Earth do you make an impact in two days.

    1. Re: What? by reanjr · · Score: 4, Funny

      She's really good.

    2. Re:What? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It takes a week jsut to get people's paperwork in order.

    3. Re:What? by McGruber · · Score: 3, Informative
      The eighth paragraph says:

      "O’Hara had joined Snap in September after more than a decade at Time Warner Inc. In her short time as Snap’s vice president of U.S. sales,"

      while the first sentence says:

      On a recent Friday, Kristen O’Hara got a major promotion: to become Snap Inc.’s chief business officer.

      Apparently, she was at the company for a few weeks as "Vice President of US Sales" before her two-day long stint as "Chief Business Officer".

    4. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone has a positive impact in a society that abhors making people feel offended

    5. Re: What? by raftpeople · · Score: 5, Funny

      She was able to shave 2 minutes off orientation by smartly positioning herself near the door for a quick exit the minute it was officially complete.

      On her laptop, she arranged common icons within a "hot zone" allowing for minimal mouse movement when firing up each app, probably saved a cumulative 48 seconds by day two.

      For restroom "scenarios", there were additional optimization but those remain private.

      Bottom line: in just 2 days, she was able to accomplish what most people do in 2.0017248 days.

    6. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is my favorite comment. I can tell your mutual disdain for these types of efficiency warriors at the corporate level.

    7. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only should would have shaved her bush and put out she'd still be in the company. The next chick knew how to put out so stuck around.

    8. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And my disdain whenever people have fucked up desktop icons or non tray ed important icons , or disorganized. .. any folder.

      I know they're going to spend 10 minutes every time they look for something

    9. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She fucked the boss and got the job. She then got a HIV positive test.

      Honestly, I have no idea, but something's come to light that Snap don't want to be associated with. Clearly.

  7. Re: BeauHD by comparison will die from Anal Warts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are there no stories about Gab being banned from the Internet?

  8. If you can indulge a bit of off topic ranting by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    This is the main problem I have with capitalism. Not enough information. My bro just took a job that was supposed to be a 12 month contract to hire sys admin job with an emphasis on writing automation scripts. Pay was good so he took it.

    Turns out it's just a monitoring gig, 6 month contract that might get extended twice to 18 before they fire him because 18 months is the most you can keep a contractor before the state gov't starts asking questions about taxes. He left a stable job for it because he wanted something that would improve his career. The better pay made it look like it really was a sys admin+light programming job. Now he's gonna waste another 6-18 months in a go nowhere contract.

    Now, at CEO level this probably isn't much of an issue. It's a nuisance at best. At my bro's level losing 6-18 months of career building is devastating.

    We need more worker protections. The reason other countries make it hard to fire is it makes employees valuable. You put effort into your employees. Same for stopping this "Contract to Hire" bullshit. And we should give _everyone_ unemployment regardless of why they're fired. I don't care of the occasional surfer dude gets lazy and hangs out on unemployment. It's not like it pays much. But right now companies can outright lie to me and mine to get us to take jobs that we think are great but suck, and it's not that easy to just change jobs. It's not a bloody Twinkie.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:If you can indulge a bit of off topic ranting by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Things I always ask in an interview, because no one fucking tells you if you don't explicitly ask:

      Is this a full-time, permanent career position?
      Is this a new position, or an existing position?
        - If it's an existing position: Is it already vacant? If not, will there be overlap with the current person in the position?
        - If it's a new position: Is it an additional position in an existing role, or is it a new role entirely?
      Do you do 9-5? Or is it 8-5 with a 1 hour lunch?
      Do you have options for working remotely, either occasionally or on a regular basis?
      Where would I be working? This office, or a satellite/branch office?
      Is it salaried, or hourly? How is overtime handled, and how often is that offered/expected?

    2. Re:If you can indulge a bit of off topic ranting by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      So why doesn't he quit and find another job? You don't need to take the job if it turns out it wasn't what you expected.

    3. Re:If you can indulge a bit of off topic ranting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You and your bro sound like straight up idiots - just the kind that a safe, caring and oppressive government structure would appeal to. Oh SURE I can't speak out against the government but it protects me and even though all the specialized medicine is gone everybody gets the standard, sub standard kind of medicine so no uppity rich people get more than the poor.

      You're not ranting, you're a moron.
      You don't hate capitalism you think the world owes you food, shelter, entertainment and a job all for free because you were born and society should kowtow to your superior utopian vision.

      In effect all you want is for life to be one giant, damn bloody twinkie.

      And, of course, when push comes to shove, you'll be the very first to kick the pregnant woman out of line so you can get your food because you need yours.

    4. Re:If you can indulge a bit of off topic ranting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen to this compassionate conservative whiner go full nazi retard, lol. You wouldn't SURVIVE to MAKE IT TO the food line, you treasonous git. We'll SKIN your precious white victimstance to wipe immigrants' asses with, as you deserve.

      Obama will probably be granted full prima nocta for your mom's next wedding. (Deplorable inbred nazi faggots deserve nothing less.)

    5. Re:If you can indulge a bit of off topic ranting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong order. He needs to find a new job then quit. But while he has one it is much easier to find a new one.

    6. Re:If you can indulge a bit of off topic ranting by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      Bad move, don't ask salary negotiating questions during the interview. Wait until they've offered you the job before you start discussing some of those details. It puts you in a much stronger negotiating position.

    7. Re:If you can indulge a bit of off topic ranting by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      My bro just took a job that was supposed to be a 12 month contract to hire sys admin job with an emphasis on writing automation scripts. Pay was good so he took it. Turns out it's just a monitoring gig, 6 month contract that might get extended twice to 18 before they fire him

      He didn't even read the terms of the contract he signed? Hate to say it but someone who can't be bothered to read his contract is a low-level grunt, not to be entrusted with anything important, so sounds like he is in the correct position for his abilities.

      (Yeah, mod me down all you like, that statement will remain true).

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    8. Re:If you can indulge a bit of off topic ranting by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

      The questions about new vs. existing role and overlaps with existing people are important. I work as a contractor all the time and find that a lot of weak managers don't do a lot of explicit responsibility assignment, it's often an organic power grab among a team of people ostensibly at the same level. When one of those people leave, the remaining team members cherry pick that departing employee's responsibilities, and the new team member is left with all the shit work even though the entire team is essentially peers. I only care as a contractor because if I'm installing something, I need to know who actually is lead on networking, storage, etc. It's amazing how many managers are clueless about who actually does what and often how power hoarding leads to single person dependencies. Sometimes the conflicts are bad enough that employee A who does networking literally won't do work for employee B who does storage or backup, despite the fact that Manager bought $100k gizmo that needs A & B to cooperate to get the job done. There's a lot of bullshit in IT, but the petty conflict and I'm-smarter-than-you stuff is what really drives me over the edge.

    9. Re:If you can indulge a bit of off topic ranting by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      This is the main problem I have with capitalism. ...
      Turns out it's just a monitoring gig, 6 month contract that might get extended twice to 18 before they fire him because 18 months is the most you can keep a contractor before the state gov't starts asking questions about taxes. ....
      We need more worker protections. .

      It sounds like those worker protections that the government enforces are more the problem than capitalism.

      And leaving any job for a new job is a risk. Sorry your brother was lured in by the money (i.e. his own personal capitalism) and left the job that was stable,

      Just curious, should there be protections for employers that invest and treat their employees well to prevent people from quitting just to go to a company that can pay more?

    10. Re:If you can indulge a bit of off topic ranting by sexconker · · Score: 1

      None of those are salary negotiating questions. Further, I won't even go to an interview unless they tell me a salary range ahead of time. (Not that it matters anymore - in my state the law says employers have to post the salary range when advertising a job.)

    11. Re:If you can indulge a bit of off topic ranting by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      None of those are salary negotiating questions.

      Of course they are. They are things of interest to you (or you wouldn't be asking them) directly related to the *conditions* of how you would be working. They are prime things to bring up during a negotiation unless you're stuck applying for cubicle roles where negotiation doesn't really come into it.

      salary range

      So something that is able to be negotiated about.

    12. Re:If you can indulge a bit of off topic ranting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asking questions about working conditions is not salary negotiation dipshit.

    13. Re: If you can indulge a bit of off topic ranting by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      So tell him to start looking for another job now, if he has found one then don't sign the next contract renewal. When they ask him about such a short duration at that job (and they will) he can explain why. I had a job where I had to quit shortly after joining to move to another city and look after my dying father, I don't even put it on my CV, I have a good reason, but I don't like explaining it over and over. When they ask about the gap (and most don't even notice) I just say I took a break.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  9. This should have stayed on Bloomberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This article has no relevance on Slashdot. If this article makes the cut then so would hundreds/thousands of other irrelevant topics.

  10. SNAP by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    https://food-stamps.org/snap-h...

    -or-

    Snap Inc.
    Snap Inc. is an American technology and social media company, founded on September 16, 2011, by Evan Spiegel and Bobby Murphy and based in Venice, California. It has four products: Snapchat, Spectacles, Bitmoji, and Zenly. The company was originally named Snapchat Inc. upon its inception, but it was rebranded on September 24, 2016, as Snap Inc. in order to include the Spectacles product under a single company.More at Wikipedia

    Formerly called:
    Snapchat Inc. (2011â"2016)

    Type:
    Public

    Traded as:
    NYSE: [ ], Class A (non-voting), Class B (single vote, private), Class C (10 votes, founders only, private)

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  11. Ali G Would Ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iz it cuz I iz a womyn?

  12. Seems like it's the product that's important by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    The best way to improve a business is to improve the product of that business. What's a "business solutions team" supposed to do? Improve business opportunities? Improve recognition by other businesses? I'm not sure.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    1. Re: Seems like it's the product that's important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What it usually means is figuring out how other businesses can use the product you have. Mostly marketing but may include the sales too.

  13. "snap" as in "without careful thought" by drnb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What the heck is "Snap"?

    A snap judgment/decision is "a judgment or decision made quickly, without careful thought or discussion."
    https://www.ldoceonline.com/di...

    ;-)

  14. Fake news by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    She had a deep understanding of our business from the outset

    I call bs. Even a cursory look at Snapchat's history and recent business decisions shows no one there has a deep understanding of their business.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  15. Leadership skills by scott_evil · · Score: 1

    How the fuck is a CEO "working to improve his leadership skills"? That's some next level shit.

    1. Re:Leadership skills by boulat · · Score: 2

      Its a shit company with shit product. She should've looked at the
      Glassdooor reviews and told them to fuck off.

    2. Re: Leadership skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the founder who got big valuation kind because some big VC invested.

      The founders are essentially kids who had a great idea. The VCs come in with their money and expertise to help grow the business.... the founders are part of the brand... so you can't just buy it and kick them out... and you know idealistic kids don't want to sell controlling stakes.... so they get to be CEO.... but they are just kids.... the VC board will put in the professional business types to make sure the kid CEO don't screw up too badly and they try to guide them on how to run a big business.

      There are a few out comes.... like the Uber CEO had to be kicked out because he is just a evil kid to the core and is driving the company to the ground with his ego. For google the founders were CEOs then step down then become CEO then step down because he embodies the spirit of the company and professional business people have no soul .... so there is a tug o war until the company comes to some sort of balance. Then there are kid CEOs who are really smart and grew up to embody the spirit of the company and then maturing into top notch CEOs... like like him or hate him Steve Jobs.

    3. Re: Leadership skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evans totally looked like the evil kid to the core that will drive the company to the ground type.

  16. It's an example of what techies should expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of the comments have been variations of how is this relevant to slashdotters. If you're young and haven't yet entered the market, this is an actual example of corporate double talk that you're probably going to have to deal with out there in the real world, not some Doonesbury cartoon or SNL parody. I suppose that's some justification for it being here.

    1. Re: It's an example of what techies should expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wise words..

    2. Re:It's an example of what techies should expect by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      Maybe more like the place Dilbert "works".

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  17. Re: BeauHD by comparison will die from Anal Wart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because if you don't support the Democrat party of Hollywood / Silicon Valley / Wall Street / media elites, you're a racist. ... Or something.

  18. Snizap! by dohzer · · Score: 1

    Does that make it a "snap decision"?

  19. Was the agency Harvey Nash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a huge layoff of technical recruiters in 2001, along with everyone else. There was another huge layoff in 2008. Each time this happened a lot of knowledge and expertise was lost, along with ethics.

    Today's recruiters are college dropouts. Not the kind that Silicon Valley built itself with. These are the other kind. Some of them have college degrees. They want to learn but they are stuck with the dregs for leadership and management.

    Keep this is mind when evaluating the following narrative:

    =====

    29 October 2018 USPS Certified Mail Reciept # 7018 0680 0000 3326 8185

    State of California
    Department of Industrial Relations
    Labor Commissioner
    455 Golden Gate Ave.,Â10th Floor
    San Francisco, CA 94102
    Attn: Retaliation Complaint Investigation Unit (RCI)

    To whom it may concern:

    I was recently contacted by Harvey Nash USA â" a recruiting firm located in New Jersey â" via electronic mail, as a candidate for a temporary position they were recruiting for, on behalf of Genentech, in California. [1]

    This initial email, sent at 6:30 California time, was followed by a series of text messages less than two hours later in which the recruiter attempted to goad me into reading my email. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]

    I logged into my electronic mail account and read the electronic mail referenced above [1]. I did not see any information relating to compensation in the description of the temporary employment position.

    I sent the recruiter an electronic mail requesting the compensation range, as described in California Labor Code 432.3. [10]

    After three hours had passed I sent the recruiter another electronic mail requesting the compensation range, again, as described in California Labor Code 432.3. [11]

    I received an answer that was evasive and useless. [12]

    I informed the recruiter, politely, that his employer was obligated, under California Labor Code 432.3, to provide candidates with compensation information, upon request. [13]

    I note, in passing, that Genentech surely knows this and is negligent in failing to instruct their agents of their duty.

    I received an electronic mail from Brad Oremâ(TM)s manager at Harvey Nash USA, Erick Bosquez, stating that he was intervening in the relationship to terminate Harvey Nash USAâ(TM)s relationship with me (which must surely be over two decades old â" possibly older than Mr Bosquez) and that to insure that Harvey Nash USA never submitted me to another job in the State of California, that he was removing me from the corporate database. [14]

    This seems a rather extreme reaction to me.

    Based on information and belief Mr Bosquez then relayed my personal identifying information to others in his business outside of Harvey Nash USA, via web interface and/or electronic mail, in an attempt to insure that I would be blackballed in the information technology industry and never work again.

    Based on the above evidence, Harvey Nash USA is engaged in the business of technical recruiting, in California, while at the same time systematically and deliberately flouting California labor laws.

    Based on the above evidence, Harvey Nash USA management is consciously and deliberately violating California Labor Code 432.3, as well as whatever labor codes relate to retaliation.

    Based on the above evidence, retaliating against candidates whom insist upon abiding by the law is a standard policy at Harvey Nash, sanctioned at the highest levels of the organizationâ(TM)s management.

    Based on the above evidence, Harvey Nash USA quite likely violates these laws on a regular basis with many other candidates, many of whom are California citizens, and at least some of whom remain unaware that their rights were violated.

    As a California citizen, and as a victim of these predatory and criminal tactics, I request you to use your legal authority to enforce California Labor Code 432.3 against these California-located corporations, such as Genentech, and their crony recruiting agencies, such as Harvey Nash USA â" who are telecommuting into California and not just taking recruiting work from California citizens, but acting like criminals, and even heavy-handed thugs, in the process.

  20. Businesses Media Snap CEO Hired Chief Business Of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my! Something else in this world not to give a shit about.
    I've got billions of things not to give a fuck about and now this?

    > /dev/null

  21. Stuff that's important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever. You suck.

  22. Re: BeauHD by comparison will die from Anal Warts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because no one but Nazis care.

  23. Changed his mind two days later? by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

    Shall we call it a "Snap decision"?

    <rimshot!>

  24. without direct reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plebs without direct reports cannot comprehend the power-play at executive level. You should all abstain from making comments losers.

  25. What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snap (sounds like the start of Snapple)? Is that some kind of drink? Never heard of them.

  26. In her time here... by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 1

    Really?

    "In her time here, ... ... I will miss the leadership and enthusiasm she brought ..."

    In two days? What kind of time scale are they working on?

    Perhaps they are working with ultra micro incremental development. Perhaps 1 hour sprints.

  27. SImple, double credit by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    This was a clever strategy to get credit for hiring two women, but only having to keep one on full time.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  28. Re: BeauHD by comparison will die from Anal Warts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suddenly the beauty of open, uncensored human expression without oppressive censorship is a Nazi ideal.

    You people are fucking insane.