Slashdot Mirror


English Has the Scientific Edge -- For Now (axios.com)

For centuries, science was a multilingual affair, powered by French, German, English and other tongues. But since the early 1970s, English has become the undisputed lingua franca of scientific papers, conferences, and discourse. From a report: English-speaking countries now have a huge leg up in technical research, including the current rages -- artificial intelligence and quantum computing. But, while English is highly unlikely to be dethroned, its advantages are eroding due to an increasingly healthy research environment in China, the fast transmission of research papers across the internet, and AI-aided translation technology that is shrinking the language barrier. [...] The dominance of English gives native speakers a huge advantage, says Michael Gordin, a Princeton professor who specializes in the role of language in technological advance.

131 of 241 comments (clear)

  1. Not entirely by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    There is a good reason why Chemistry majors have to learn German. Basically, it remains (well, it did back in 2000) the main research language for Chemistry (though not bio-chem, which was English ).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Not entirely by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Going back a bit further everything was in Latin.

    2. Re:Not entirely by gweihir · · Score: 1

      That has been over for a while now. The last German-language Chemistry journal shut down something like 10 years ago.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Not entirely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Going back a bit further everything was in Latin.

      I will end this right now: in the beginning everything was (and remains...) Greek!

    4. Re:Not entirely by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Going back a bit further everything was in Latin.

      Indeed, and that wasn't a bad idea because most learned men of most (western) nations knew Latin.

      I'd argue Esperanto might be a better language for scientific papers going forwards. It's perhaps the easiest language to learn (of the well known languages), it is, itself very scientific in how it is put together. Has a smaller group of root words, but they can be combined more easily than other languages. It wouldn't take much to make Esperanto the language of the learned it is so easy to learn.

      It is mostly based on European languages; but even China sees value in it- they post official in Esperanto too- and have the most learnersof Esperanto of any country. It truly is a global language though owned by no nation but accessible to anyone.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re:Not entirely by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      I teach chemistry at the college level in the United States, and we do not require our chemistry majors to take German. My PhD program had a foreign language requirement back in the late 90s when I started, but no specific language requirement. Since I am a computational chemist, they allowed me to substitute a foreign language with a computer programming course. I guess computer languages were foreign to most faculty at the time,. . .

    6. Re:Not entirely by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      I don't speak Greek, but if you're a scientist and don't know the Greek alphabet, that could be problematic,. . .

    7. Re:Not entirely by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      As a further observation. Russia and China might object to "English" on political grounds (and the West would certainly bristle at the complicated Mandarin and be politically opposed to learning Russian).

      Esperanto gets rid of politics when trying to come up with standards.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    8. Re:Not entirely by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yupe, You are right about no German required for ACS. Interesting that there are no more German based journals.
      I just checked Colorado State (alma mater) chem curriculum for ACS, and apparently, no longer required.
      Kind of a bummer. I did not have to do that since I only had a minor, but I thought that it was useful.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    9. Re:Not entirely by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 1

      Before the Tower of Babel, it was all Akkadian.

    10. Re:Not entirely by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      I was thinking that asian, german, or even some eastern european countries would be up there first

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    11. Re:Not entirely by superwiz · · Score: 1

      it is, itself very scientific in how it is put together

      Which is why it's not a language. Languages needs to develop and to have concepts which are fused into one (by becoming interchangeable) or split into multiple ones (through increased subtlety).

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    12. Re:Not entirely by superwiz · · Score: 1

      That's funny. Why is it that every Russian wants to hide being Russian by pretending to be perennially British? "Oswald McWeany"? There is no "the West" as a form of political thought. That's modern Russian state's political mythology.

      There is also no "proper" Russian language. The idea that anyone outside of Russia would object to learning Russian for political reasons is just weird. The only question is what is the better Russian to learn? Certainly the Russian Federation (with its population of only 145 million) does not have any more monopoly on normative Russian than UK has monopoly on normative English. Ukraine, for example, can develop its own version of Russian, as a state language, and instill it with different norms.

      And while the methodology of secondary math education is better in Russia than it is in most of the US (education is simply not uniform in the US and cannot be compared as a whole rather than district-by-district), the French math education is competitive against Russia despite being quite different. Chinese secondary math/science education is almost identical in methodology to the Russian one, but, of course, it's in a different language.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    13. Re:Not entirely by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Only if you don't know anything about Esperanto. It attempts to have a 1-1 relationship between words and concepts. And I pointed out why that's a fool's errand.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    14. Re:Not entirely by nmr_andrew · · Score: 1

      You're half right. When I started my Ph. D. in Chemistry in 1993, there was no more formal language requirement, and for a number of years prior to that grad students had to show working proficiency in one of (IIRC) German, Russian, French, or Japanese.

      OTOH, there are still German chemistry journals. Angewandte Chemie publishes in both German and English, or did last time I bothered to look at the non-international version. AFAIK, several other journals such as Zeitschrift Naturforschung are still published. I think some of the journals require that the abstract appear in both languages.

      Of course, many of our German colleagues speak English as well as if not better than most Americans speak English.

    15. Re:Not entirely by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Languages needs to develop and to have concepts which are fused into one (by becoming interchangeable) or split into multiple ones (through increased subtlety).

      No they doesn't. Stop lying.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    16. Re:Not entirely by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      However, time has moved on.

      English is the market leader because it is the language with the largest vocabulary by a very large margin. With this comes a culture of being very specific by choosing from a large number of words with quite similar meanings (despite the best efforts of many whose vocabulary is very limited).

      Many other languages have far smaller vocabularies, and have cultures where being specific is not highly prized. This makes them less suitable for science and engineering,

      In my relatively limited experience, Chinese falls into this category. German is certainly less specific than English in matters relating to time.

      However, if you wish to deliberately obfuscate, I highly recommend Pidgin English - see https://www.bbc.com/pidgin for the official BBC version. Try using that for your next PHD on thermodynamic processes involving sub-atomic particles (or the benefits of a Vegan diet for Youtube users). I assume you can still claim it was English if you can cite the BBC. No be so, abi?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    17. Re:Not entirely by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      The unreality of saying it is easier to make people learn a second language that just sticking with English, yeah kind of fucking stupid, which is exactly why Esperanto is exactly where it is. I remeber coming across an old text about battle English, the created language which merged together a series of other languages to make communications on the battlefield possible across a variety of nationalities.

      English ain't even English in reality, not a regional tongue but an assemblage of regional tongues, mainly European but as it spreads further gaining other words and continually changing.

      For Russians and Chinese it makes sense to create their version of English to make it easier to learn for their citizens but still allow global communications, which of course craps all over the corporate main stream media distortions about the world and who is really causing the trouble and who are really the victims, this made possible by language differences, those people victims of the predatory US, not being able to readily publicly speak to the rest of the world.

      Suck it up, English and it's variations are the language that will dominate but cheer up, based upon the English of the past, it will not be the current English but one that is crafted in the future out of for example Russia English and Chinese English just like the English for dummies American English. So they add in the cultural expressions and some of the most used words and if they are accepted they tend to spread globally.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    18. Re:Not entirely by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Sure, the Journals did not shut down. But they either switched to English or now allow English in addition.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    19. Re: Not entirely by SG83 · · Score: 1

      English is popular because of history of the last 70 years not because of a âoehuge vocabularyâ

      English was used for science long before it become popular.

      there are much older languages with a much richer vocabulary (and very long history in science) like Arabic for example.

      what are arabic words for TV, hadron collider, epigenetics, stereochemistry etc? btw, while arabic was popular amongst the philosopher during the middle ages (much more than latin tbh), since the Renneisance Arab speaking word ceased to produce anything worthy. How many Nobel Prize winners are Arabs?

      English didnâ(TM)t even exist yet when they were doing science in Arabic.

      and yet pretty much all the science is done in English now, for hundreds of years almost none done in Arabic. funny, innit?

      I wouldnâ(TM)t say English has a particularly rich vocabulary in fact most of its scientific vocabulary comes from Latin

      there is more words in English of greco-latin origin than there were words in ancient greek (not surprisingly, we know now a bit more).

    20. Re:Not entirely by SG83 · · Score: 1

      Most people don't have English as a first language, so they cannot stick with it. A couple of Google searches say English native speakers are 4.4% of the world population (that is, a 0.04 share of the number of living people -- not exactly much, heh?). Google "number of native english speakers in world" and "world population 2018", if you don't believe me. We're talking native speakers here because you've mentioned not learning a second language.

      ... which still takes it to the top of the most commonly spoken languages. Moder Standard Arabic, or Chinese isn't "native" to most Arabs or Chinese, respectively. Beside- what's "native"? Is English "native" in Scandinavia, where it is spoken quite often "better" than in the UK? Beside- English is the one of very few (if not the only one) lingo which has more L2 speakers than L1. and the ratio is like 4:1 or more.

      And why learn English in countries where you're exposed to e.g. French culture?

      In these countries one learns French. Than one realizes that they are better off with English and learn it. Remember- we are talking about the scientific world. Like it or not, French is almost non-existent there.

      >_ English ain't even English in reality, not a regional tongue but an assemblage of regional tongues, mainly European but as it spreads further gaining other words and continually changing.

      there is Standard English, like it or not. French or German aren't "French and German in reality" they are- to a degree- constructed languages, taught at school as a part of unification of country. Regional dialects differ, quite a lot.

      That's why it's not English and that's why English is not as important as you believe it to be.

      It's unrelated to what you wrote before. And yeah, English is important.

      For a while, French was the most used world language but its time passed...

      Even in diplomacy, French was never even close as popular as English is in the sciences. Not even close. None language ever was- not Greek, not Arabic, not Classical Chinese nor Latin.

      guess what will happen to English?

      God thanks there is no Royal Academy for English, and English words (and syntax, and grammar) change their meaning over time (slowly). I don't have doubts that English still will be a leading lingo in sciences in 100 years or more. But it may be a different English to the one we use as a standard. Beside- one doesn't have to wait for that. Already European English differs a bit from the one used in the UK and USA.

      What will be the next? Mandarin?

      Most scientific journals in China are written in English (with Chinese regionalisms).

      Japanese? Korean?

      Why do you think any of those countries would become powerhouse for science? Why would you think other countries would accept these languages for using them in science?

      I got no idea (but according to my daughter, Korean is easier).

      script most certainly is.

      I guess English will hold for a long time in certain niches, just like French is still important in diplomacy,

      When the Chinese diplomats talk with German ones, do they speak French or English? When Argentinian one speaks with Greeks, do they use French or English? French still, obviously is somehow important- but apart from the former colonies it isn't really used that much in diplomacy. not anymore

      but I think Esperanto would be a less painful way. I specially recommend it over English as a way to get a more faithful translation of works from most countries.

      1. Esperanto is unchangeable, monolithic lingo and therefore unlikely to be accepted by anyone than its enthusiasts. 2. Esperanto is useless for science (and that's the use i'm mostly concerned about). Ido has shown it (but it's also useless now). 3. Esperanto's international vocabulary is a joke. If any of the non-ethnic languages would, somehow, dominate the scientific languages it would be the Interlingua

    21. Re:Not entirely by SG83 · · Score: 1

      >No they doesn't. Stop lying.

      Which language hasn't changed for centuries and still is useful today? icelandic? nope latin? nope classical arabic? nope

    22. Re:Not entirely by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Which language hasn't changed for centuries and still is useful today?

      Is that a necessary condition for something to be a language?

      By your "logic" if I sit down with the kids tomorrow and we invent a new language then it's not a language.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:Not entirely by SG83 · · Score: 1

      English may not be owned -- and that is really a problem, because it has no underlying logic

      ... and yet people use it, and have no problem with that. Somehow it's a language of choice for most who have to co-operate with people from other nations.

      and grows in any direction, and eventually will lose its "language" characteristic -- but accessible to anyone it sure is not.

      every language changes. Massive base of already produced text will be accessible for people using future variations of English.

      Everyone who is well-versed in language learning frown at English,

      elaborate

      while all those who have a hard time will favor it -- either because it's already their first language or because they mistakenly think it is easier to learn just one additional one.

      ... or maybe because it is a quite easy to learn for (for at least B1/B2 level); it doesn't take a long time to speak communicative language. it's grammar is far easier than Spanish or Russian one.

      There is not much sense in comparing Esperanto to English, such is the difference in complexity. Esperanto is like riding a tricycle, while English would be like using a competition motorcycle... it's great until you fall.

      ... or unless you actually want to read anything other than the language course- in that case Esperanto has absolutely nothing to offer, while there is a plethora of sources in English.

      Inexperienced people can speak Esperanto, meanwhile skilled long time native English speakers sometimes fail at using it (as can be seen in lots of Youtube videos).

      ... can speak Esperanto with whom? There is hardly any speakers of it. And no, Esperanto's phonetics isn't really that easy for non-Europeans. While, I must admit, English orthography is a rather... peculiar (when compared to Esperanto or even Spanish), I must add that's using YT videos of someone mis-pronuncing words isn't really any proof. "Badly" (i.e. non conforming to the, loosely defined, standard) English is the most common English

      Vocabulary? Ask the Japanese how easy is to adapt a new word from a foreign language.

      no, it's not easy. Are you aware how hard was 'scientification' of Russian?

      About the wider discussion, most scientific articles in English are junk, because of the use of US/Imperial units (feet, inches and other body parts). That is totally unscientific.

      When I comment I try to show respect to my interlocutors, which of course mean that- even when I don't agree with them- I prefer not to use vulgar words. But forgive me, but your last quote is probably the most idiotic text i've read this weak.

  2. And yet.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Funny

    ....you're hearing less and less English spoken in the US these days.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:And yet.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did Americans ever speak proper English?

    2. Re:And yet.... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      ....you're hearing less and less English spoken in the US these days.

      You're saying that like it's a bad thing. The US doesn't have an official language. I would think that in the Land of the Free people could speak whatever language they want.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    3. Re:And yet.... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      ....you're hearing less and less English spoken in the US these days.

      I know, it's great, I love hearing all the different languages spoken, it's like being in a modern country now.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    4. Re:And yet.... by butchersong · · Score: 1

      It isn't stressed more because it isn't all that important. English it the fallback for people of different nationalities to speak to one another... Say I'm traveling to Norway for a week or two. Why would I struggle to learn more than a few token phrases of Norwegian unless I plan to live there? I'll just end up making the conversation awkward as I fumble around when I and the other person could be conversing fluently together in English.

    5. Re:And yet.... by Hadlock · · Score: 2

      England is conveniently located within 30 day's sailing time from the eastern seaboard of the US, as a result there are regions there called "new england" and other major cities were named after other major areas in Europe... New York City was famously once called new Amsterdam.
       
      So then, it shouldn't be surprising that as you head south, you have a lot of Spanish speakers, the cities often are named "San ____", reflecting their Spanish/Mexican heritage due to Spanish colonization from the south.
       
      So then, it shouldn't be surprising that as you head west, you have a lot of asian speakers, the cities often have a chinatown or japantown, reflecting their asian heritage due to importing asians to build American railroads, and also simply being 30 days sailing time from the western seaboard of the US.
       
      TL;DR if you don't live on the east coast, it is really weird to hear someone being concerned about English being spoken in the US, because it is only 1/3rd of the picture, and you sound very isolated. I am glad you are here on the internet now, maybe you can catch up on being exposed to other cultures now. Good luck.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    6. Re:And yet.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Good. It's about time stupid Americans learn some more languages. I was incredibly embarrassed the first time I went to Europe,and all I knew was English and I was only semi-fluent in Spanish. I'm working on improving my own grasp of other languages now, but I wish I had more opportunities in school to learn more languages, and I wish its importance was stressed more.

      I don't argue at all that learning more than one language is a GREAT thing!!

      However, if you LIVE in the US, you should use English as your primary language, especially when out and about in public. You should not rely on having things printed not only in English but Spanish and other languages. (Have you lately had to really look all over a packaged product in the US lately to find English description/instructions? Didn't used to be that way.).

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:And yet.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      The US doesn't have an official language.

      And that is a problem.

      We should pass laws stating that English IS the official language in this country.....other countries have an official language.

      We should too.

      If we didn't print everything in other languages too, it would help people coming here to learn it faster.

      That same type of immersion situation we use in language classes in college, where English is only spoken the first day and the rest of the time, it is the language of whatever class you are in.

      If we did that with, say, government documents, etc....people would be forced to learn the common language of the land much quicker and therefore be able to integrate into the greater melting pot quicker.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:And yet.... by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      Less and less science too. Funny, that.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    9. Re:And yet.... by DogDude · · Score: 2

      , if you LIVE in the US, you should use English as your primary language, especially when out and about in public.

      Why is that?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    10. Re:And yet.... by superwiz · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      They did by definition. The normative English is the one spoken in North America -- not the one spoken in the UK or any other former member of the British Empire. Don't let the name "England" confuse you. It's mostly a historical artifact. British English is no more normative English than the "Old English" is "English".

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    11. Re:And yet.... by superwiz · · Score: 1

      In a free society, yes. But you have to be a country to be a free country. And you can't be a country if people can't talk to each other.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    12. Re:And yet.... by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Jesus, Hillary! Put down the Chardonnay. You've had enough.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    13. Re:And yet.... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's not needed, but it is also desirable to know a second language. Everywhere else in the world people are expected to learn a second or third language. Whether that's to get along better with neighbors and have trade, or because the country has multiple languages.

      Much of that reason also I think is that America was somewhat isolated for a very long time, and for a period was intentionally isolationist. In schools you would be disciplined in the past for speaking a second language as well, even if you did not use that langauge for schoolwork (this happens in a few other countries).

      Note that the US does not have an "official" language.

      I learned a little bit of a lot of languages. This is very useful at times, you can figure out road signs, what a store is selling, and so forth. I was able to use a train ticket vending machine without help in Helsinki.

    14. Re:And yet.... by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Because if you don't you will be severely limiting your economic opportunities. It is also disrespectful.

    15. Re:And yet.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I know, it's great, I love hearing all the different languages spoken, it's like being in a modern country now.

      It was even nicer only say, a few decades ago...when you could walk anywhere in public and understand what was being said around you....and you generally only heard Spanish spoken in public if you were visiting border towns.

      It is much nicer when everyone speaks the 'common' language in public, which used to be English.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    16. Re:And yet.... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Note that in Europe and many other places, students start to learn a second language at a young age. In the US this doesn't happen until high school or later, where it is only optional. It used to be required to study a second language in many colleges or pre-college tracks in high schools, even if you didn't learn enough to be able to read a foreign language book easily.

    17. Re:And yet.... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Some countries have multiple official languages as well... Also note that making an official language only means that official documents are in that language, not that people are required to learn it or are forbidden to use other languages. Making English the official language of the US would not actually change anything about how people speak or how documents are written.

    18. Re:And yet.... by blindseer · · Score: 1

      If adopting English as the official language in the USA would not change anything then why do so many people oppose adopting English as the official language?

      I have my own theories. The problems of French and English use in Canada is an example of what could happen in the USA if a single official language is not adopted. Those opposing a single official language are looking to produce in the USA that same kind of division of the public seen in Canada.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    19. Re:And yet.... by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Less and less science too. Funny, that.

      I agree, only I'm not laughing. (Not that you are. "Curious" would, IMHO, be a better choice than "funny".)

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    20. Re:And yet.... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      ....you're hearing less and less English spoken in the US these days.

      One must admit.

      President Trump is a "bigly" part of the of the problem on that one.

    21. Re:And yet.... by hjf · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of countries in the world where people "can't talk to each other".

    22. Re:And yet.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Much of that reason also I think is that America was somewhat isolated for a very long time, and for a period was intentionally isolationist.

      Well, another thing is...the United States of America, is so large, you really can very easily grow up here and never have any reason or cause to leave the country.

      So, I'd venture to guess that the vast majority of US citizens don't have a passport and don't travel outside the US, and never run into any need to speak another language.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    23. Re:And yet.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      It's also disrepectful to listen in on other people's conversations that have ZERO to do with you. Why the fuck do I care if the people at the next table in the restaurant are speaking Swahili or whatever? They're not talking to me.

      It's nice to know if they are talking ABOUT you.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    24. Re:And yet.... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Disrespectful to who, exactly?

      It's only limiting your opportunities if you're economic opportunities only involved people who only speak English. If you're working with people who speak another language, you'd be limiting your economic opportunities by speaking English.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    25. Re:And yet.... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      It's nice to know if they are talking ABOUT you.

      If you're that worried about what strangers are saying about you, you might want to see a psychologist. That doesn't seem, to me, like a healthy state of mind.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    26. Re:And yet.... by jeff4747 · · Score: 2

      And that is a problem.

      Why?

      And while explaining this, keep in mind in the vast majority of cases the grandchildren of any non-English-speaking immigrants only speak English fluently.

    27. Re:And yet.... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      So everyone in America should speak English because you don't like not being able to eaves drop on other's conversations?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    28. Re:And yet.... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Individual states may have their own rules. But in California we have our ballots in multiple languages, it does not cause any problems. I believe that English is required for some purposes, such as an ingredient list on food, but that does not forbid the use of other languagues as well.

      I don't really see the use of both French and English on Canadian *products* to be a problem; the French/English divide in Canada comes more from Quebec attitudes that everyone needs to be bilingual except them.

    29. Re:And yet.... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      don't need to eavesdrop, here's what they're saying:

      if it's arabic they're talking about blowing shit up and killing people and popping their suicide belt.

      if it's spanish it's how they snuck in here around Trump's 20 mile long wall and are going to steal your job.

      if it's Black English they're talking about how they're going to shiv your white ass and fuck your women

      if it's Chinese or Indian it's how they're going to take all the tech jobs and higher education classes leaving you with burger smashing jobs and cash register training

      These and other horrible conversations are happening right in front of you. Better vote Trump to go back to how It Used to Be!

    30. Re: And yet.... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      North or south of the 49th parallel?

      Yes, or possibly no. (Ask W C Fields).

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    31. Re:And yet.... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      That's sarcasm I hope?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    32. Re:And yet.... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The problems of French and English use in Canada is an example of what could happen in the USA if a single official language is not adopted.

      Since this thread is about science, how about we do an experiment?

      Method: take one standard off-the-shelf USA, and have it not adopt an official language. Leave it a couple of centuries.

      Result: no problems of French and English use like in Canada were detected.

      Conclusion: you are full of shit.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    33. Re:And yet.... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Belgium, Switzerland, India, South Africa.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    34. Re:And yet.... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      yes, mentioning Trump's 20 mile long wall (it may be up to 37 miles now) should have clued you in.

    35. Re:And yet.... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Written text is a notoriously poor medium for sarcasm as so much of truly good sarcasm it tied up in tonal or physical posturing.

      Be happy I basically got your poor use of the medium.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    36. Re:And yet.... by hjf · · Score: 1

      also Paraguay where a large part of the population only speaks Guarani but no Spanish.
      China has hundreds of dialects and often people from different parts of the country can't communicate.

    37. Re:And yet.... by superwiz · · Score: 1

      The normative English is the one spoken in North America.

      Sez who?

      Native English speakers outside of UK (aka the overwhelming majority of the native English speakers).

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    38. Re:And yet.... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Most Americans still understand and respect the concept of pronunciation

      That must be why they say the plane was brought down by a missal or that medieval peasants lived under the futile system.

      Don't get me started about ''nuclear''. See where the ''u'' is? See what's between the ''c'' and the ''l''?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    39. Re:And yet.... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      ...other countries have an official language.

      We should too.

      I thought the entire point was to *not* do what other countries do, because communism and #MAGA and NUMBER ONE!

      Or does that only apply to things like public healthcare, not allowing crackpots to run round slaughtering anyone they don't like the look of, or separating politics and religion?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    40. Re:And yet.... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Careful. You'll set off the "languages evolve" twats who'll find some convoluted way to eggcorn it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    41. Re:And yet.... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      the overwhelming majority of the native English speakers

      Eat shit, then. After all flies overwhelmingly outnumber humans or any other mammal.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    42. Re:And yet.... by superwiz · · Score: 1

      There is one thing most of them agree on: the American dialect is ugly and stupid.

      You are literally the first person ever to tell me this. And that includes all the anti-American crap people post on the Internet. So I am gonna call bull shit on this claim. In fact, I haven't heard anyone say "American dialect" in a very long time. On the other hand, people talk about a "British accent", when referring to the way Brits say things, quite a bit.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    43. Re:And yet.... by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that Brits are better people who speak English and everyone must mimic them? Talking about a legend in your own mind....

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    44. Re:And yet.... by superwiz · · Score: 1

      What difference does it make? An "accent", as such, is not normative speech. So if the British way of speaking is an "accent", while the American way is not, then the normative English is the American one.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    45. Re:And yet.... by superwiz · · Score: 1

      The Midwestern pronunciation was made normative by Walter Cronkite. It's the pronunciation all national news anchors are expected to have.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    46. Re:And yet.... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I know, it's great, I love hearing all the different languages spoken, it's like being in a modern country now.

      It was even nicer only say, a few decades ago...when you could walk anywhere in public and understand what was being said around you....

      I've never had someone come up to me and randomly start speaking a foreign language to me that I didn't understand. Usually the only people speaking foreign languages are people who are not speaking directly to me. (unless I'm trying to speak said foreign language with them).

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    47. Re:And yet.... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      We should pass laws stating that English IS the official language in this country.....other countries have an official language.

      We should too.

      Other countries have universal health care and better patient outcomes too, but what are ya gonna do?

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  3. Duh by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    We need a metric language. Those stupid English users and their imperial language is so last year.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Duh by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Metric conjugations:

      To walk To centiwalk To kilowalk

      Let's run with that.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Duh by samwichse · · Score: 1

      I think that's called "Esperanto."

  4. Re:Oxymoron, anyone? by ranton · · Score: 1

    From the Summary:
    >English has become the undisputed lingua franca

    I wonder if they know what that means... or if they were going for that on purpose.

    I wonder if the author also confuses words like pizza and lasagna as being English words.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  5. Re:Liberal idiots by ranton · · Score: 2

    Because of all the liberal idiots that just LOVE illegal immigration, pretty soon English won't even be the dominant language spoken in the United States.

    So currently about 80% of households speak English as their dominant language at home, as opposed to 13% of those who speak Spanish as their dominant language at home. Other than ignorance, I'm not sure how you have come to the conclusion that English won't be the dominant language in the United States for the foreseeable future.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  6. China's cheating culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The real challenge facing Chinese as a dominant research language is the deeply ingrained and well-known cheating culture that pervades China's academic system, tracing its origins back centuries to the highly competitive Imperial Civil Service exams.

    Since publication is the modern day badge of success in academia, a much greater proportion of Chinese research papers are rife with shortcuts, bad data, poor research design, and even outright fraud when compared to their peers in Western Universities, Japan, etc.

    Until Chinese Universities and Journals clean up their act regarding reproducibility and peer review, their research will always be considered less credible and lack in influence despite its sheer volume.

  7. Re:Heh. Lingua franca. by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

    Plenty of people who understand how language actually works snicker at your snickering.

  8. Re:Liberal idiots by alvinrod · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't be surprised if you were to look at historical trends and see the rate of English increasing. People tend to forget that the U.S. had huge waves of immigration throughout its history and that it's still not uncommon for many people today to have grandparents who grew up speaking Italian, German, Polish, Norwegian, etc. at home instead of English.

    The people who are in houses speaking Spanish today will have grandchildren that won't speak a word of it.

  9. Re:Oxymoron, anyone? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    They were just sticking their thumb in the frog's eye.

    The french are really butthurt that frogish is now a backwater language.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  10. Re:Heh. Lingua franca. by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is never a bad time to mock the french.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  11. Re:Liberal idiots by El+Cubano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    as opposed to 13% of those who speak Spanish as their dominant language at home.

    Not only that. I worked with a guy whose father immigrated to the US from Mexico in the 1950s or 1960s. He went into the Army and after he was dinged on a fitrep for his thick accent being a barrier to effective communication with other soldiers, he decided that his kids weren't going to go through that. He instituted a strict English-only policy at home and as a consequence, my co-worker (who had a very Latino name) speaks only English (and that with a Texas accent).

    Not every immigrant family has an English-only policy at home, but I have interacted with enough people who grew up with that to conclude that it is not all that uncommon. Even the homes where there is not an explicit English-only policy, the kids frequently don't master their parents' native language, perhaps gaining only limited conversational ability. Face it, with television, radio, other media, their friends at school, etc. all speaking English there is usually only a very weak incentive (from the point of a child) to learn another language. Their kids, in turn, will almost certainly not speak the grandparents' native language.

    What I find really interesting is the places like New York, San Antonio, Miami, etc., where there are significant ethnic populations and neighborhoods. You can typically walk around and see signage and hear people speaking where words of the immigrant community's language are interspersed among English. From what I have observed children who grow up in those sorts of neighborhoods, whether their parents are immigrants or natives, tend to develop a sort of pidgin that mixes English with the popular ethnic words used in shops, restaurants, etc.

    I suspect that if I had not ended up in IT I would have become a linguist or etymologist.

  12. Re:Liberal idiots by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Not in places like San Diego or El Paso.

    We run the risk of being culturally balkanized. TV helps, but schools need to be English only.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  13. Re:Liberal idiots by butchersong · · Score: 1

    This is seeming less likely. The attempt to end birthright citizenship by the current administration if it were to go through would have a significant impact on this. I don't have anything against Spanish myself other than the fact that it is more suited to philosophy and theology than science imo but I'm not sure anymore that current demographic trends are going to continue.

  14. One thing I wish I would have known earlier by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Decades ago when I was in middle school I had to select a second language to study. That time happened to be another one of those periods when many of the loudest voices in the US were telling us we all needed to learn Spanish ASAP to prepare to communicate with all the people living (or yet to be born) in Mexico and South America (Brazil be damned, of course). So I followed that reasoning and suffered through 3 years of Spanish by the time I was done with high school.

    Yet even then I had an inclination towards science. Now many years past college, I repeatedly realize that the language I should have taken is indeed German. While I have never met someone at a conference who speaks German but not English, I almost never meet anyone at a conference who speaks any significant degree of Spanish. In my field the top languages after English are almost certainly German, Mandarin, Hindi, Russian, Japanese, French, Italian, and Dutch (in that order). I meet more people speaking Norwegian than I meet speaking Spanish.

    Sure, Spanish is useful for many people, but I could have instead studied a language of use to me back then.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:One thing I wish I would have known earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I satisfied my "Foreign Language" requirement in high school by taking Pascal. Seriously. I'm not joking.

    2. Re:One thing I wish I would have known earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I studied Russian, and maybe it's just my field (high power lasers) but I end up talking with tons of scientists in Russian.

    3. Re:One thing I wish I would have known earlier by ranton · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but if you "suffered" studying Spanish, which is among the easiest languages for a native English speaker to learn, you would have never hacked it studying German, let alone Mandarin, Russian, Japanese, or Hindi.

      I think you are confusing the words "suffer" and "struggle".

      I suffered through 3 hours of an opera once, but that doesn't mean it was difficult for me to sit there doing nothing.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    4. Re:One thing I wish I would have known earlier by avandesande · · Score: 1

      It really depends on what field you are talking about. Modern chemistry was pioneered in Germany while modern medicine began in France.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  15. So, which is it? by geoscodin · · Score: 1

    Headline: "English Has the Scientific Edge -- For Now"

    Synopsis: "But, while English is highly unlikely to be dethroned"

    So for now and probably always?

    1. Re:So, which is it? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Headline: "English Has the Scientific Edge -- For Now"

      Synopsis: "But, while English is highly unlikely to be dethroned"

      So for now and probably always?

      Always is a very long time.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  16. English will remain #1 forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not like how Greek, Arabic, and Latin were replaced in their times as the language of science and mathematics.

  17. Re:Heh. Lingua franca. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    I always snicker when I hear of English being the lingua franca of anything. If I'm not mistaken, 'lingua franca' means literally 'French language' and stems from the days when French was the international language.

    Some day, English may be the lingua franca of France.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  18. Re:Oxymoron, anyone? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1, Funny

    From the Summary: >English has become the undisputed lingua franca

    I wonder if they know what that means... or if they were going for that on purpose.

    I wonder if the author also confuses words like pizza and lasagna as being English words.

    That's because pizza and lasagna are English words. Just like every word in this sentence, comprende? The English invented language. The English had Shakespeare and Socrates. Homer and Hemingway. If you go back and look at pictures of London from a million years ago, they had steam engines and skyscrapers, while the rest of the world was living in mud huts and grunting.

    The English had computers in 1837. At that time America didn't even have roads and people fought over such primitive things like cattle or religion. Since we're talking about science, you know that Darwin guy that invented atheism? He was English.

  19. Re:Liberal idiots by skids · · Score: 1

    Post colonialism, immigration is what kept English dominant in the first place. You take people from other countries in, show them what a real civilization looks like, and some of them they take that, and English, back to their homelands. The kids of the ones that stay become inadvertent English teachers to whoever else arrives. Only the knee-jerk primitives among us fail to realize that you have to be culturally evangelical to avoid fading away... if you just shut yourself up in your hill fort people just forget about you and move on without you.

    Unfortunately we are rapidly approaching the point at which we won't have a real civilization to show off.

  20. Re:Modern American English by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Modern American English is a combination of English and many other languages (Spanish, French, German and others)
    In many ways, it's a sort of global language that continually evolves.

    You didn't need to specify "American" there as that is true for all varieties of mainstream English. Of course, what's even more fun is when you consider that almost half of English words have a French-connection. "French" was originally a pidgin of Germanic languages and Latin. (the Franks being a German tribe settling in an area which had been speaking Latin because of the Roman rule for centuries). German is a mishmash of various regional variants that came to form one language and has borrowed from it's neighbours.

    English has also taken on words from India, Turkey, Native Americans, and more. So we speak a put-together language that took it's inspiration from other languages that were put-together from other combinations.

    200 years from now I bet Chinese and English will be influencing each other heavily with English words being adopted into Mandarin and Mandarin words being adopted into English. Language is a beautiful messed up thing.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  21. Not sure about the advantages by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 2

    To native speakers, I mean. I have noticed that (educated) foreigners who learnt English as a second language all too often seem to be able to write better English than native speakers. Learning English natively will give you an edge if you aspire to become a horse racing commentator for the BBC. For writing up research papers (or books) on physics, chemistry, mathematics, biology, etc. not so much.

    1. Re:Not sure about the advantages by superwiz · · Score: 2

      Research papers are usually poorly written though. They aren't known for their prose.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    2. Re:Not sure about the advantages by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 2

      You're actually kind of right. Whereas being a native speaker certainly gives you a temporary advantage, english is a simple and widespread enough language that the advantage is not THAT great. Besides, native english speakers, particularly the american and british, tend to speak only one language, their own, whereas a lot of other people in the world now speak at least two - their own, and english. So who really has the edge in the end? Not that clear in fact!

    3. Re:Not sure about the advantages by larryjoe · · Score: 1

      To native speakers, I mean. I have noticed that (educated) foreigners who learnt English as a second language all too often seem to be able to write better English than native speakers. Learning English natively will give you an edge if you aspire to become a horse racing commentator for the BBC. For writing up research papers (or books) on physics, chemistry, mathematics, biology, etc. not so much.

      I have found that educated, non-native English speakers generally understand English very well, speak English fairly well, and write somewhat well. Grammar and diction are often challenging. For example, one very common challenge is knowing when to include an article such as "a" or "the", which is intuitive to a native speaker but is often difficult to describe precisely with a rule for those who are not linguists. I read and review a fair number of technical papers, and I have found that is it not uncommon for very intelligent authors that understand the subject matter and speak English fluently to use nonstandard grammar and diction. Of course, the general American on the street also would struggle with standard grammar and diction, but native English speakers who write technical papers generally struggle less in this regard, although this observation doesn't necessarily extend to other aspects of written composition.

    4. Re:Not sure about the advantages by Livius · · Score: 1

      Learning a second language, any second language, can help you to communicate more clearly in both that language and your native language. A hundred years ago people would have studied Latin fully expecting that kind of practical benefit with no expectation of ever actually speaking Latin.

    5. Re:Not sure about the advantages by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It's not just foreigners who learn English, it's English speakers who learn a foreign language too. For some reason teach English has devolved to the studying of literature without every explaining simple things like the components that make up a sentence.

      I didn't know what the "past participle" was until I learnt a second language. And it was while learning that second language that I started correcting some of my poor English.

  22. AI-aided translation technology by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 2

    For scientific papers? Really? If you want to understand the complete opposite of what they claim, maybe.

  23. Re:Heh. Lingua franca. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I always snicker when I hear of English being the lingua franca of anything. If I'm not mistaken, 'lingua franca' means literally 'French language' and stems from the days when French was the international language.

    I don't like using French words. They fatigue me.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  24. Here's how you get Americans to pay for science by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    it worked for NASA. The moon landing was basically a big, multi-billion dollar middle finger to Russia. All we gotta do to restore the last 40 years of cuts to science & education is convince the ones doing the cutting that they're gonna all end up speaking Mandarin and watch the money flow in.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Here's how you get Americans to pay for science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All we gotta do to restore the last 40 years of cuts to science & education

      Don't forget to kidnap a team of German rocket scientists.

    2. Re:Here's how you get Americans to pay for science by quanminoan · · Score: 1

      Don't think we won't!

    3. Re:Here's how you get Americans to pay for science by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      "Vunce zey go up, who cares where they come down?
      Zat's not my department," says Wernher von Braun

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Here's how you get Americans to pay for science by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Americans aren't patriotic like that any more. Patriotism is equivalent to bigotry.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  25. Re:Liberal idiots by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

    I don't care what they speak, as long as the list includes English.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  26. Re:Oxymoron, anyone? by superwiz · · Score: 1

    It doesn't mean "French". It means as universally understood as French used to be. Don't take idioms literally.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  27. Re:Heh. Lingua franca. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
    No. Lingua Franca is actually a Latin phrase, meaning the Language of the Franks.

    Who were the Franks? Anyone west of Rome/Italy is a Frank. It is like that famous cartoon of New Yorker's view of America. There is Hudson, New Jersey ... and San Francisco somewhere over there.

    It means a link language, language of communications between the unwashed masses, while the high society of priests were using Latin.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  28. Re:Liberal idiots by Anonymice · · Score: 1

    As a native English speaker living in a foreign speaking country, I would absolutely primarily speak English at home with my children. I don't yet have children, so I mostly speak the native language at home in order to hone my skills, however that will change when I have kids. Being immersed in the local lingo, they'll have no problem learning it - no doubt to a level far higher than my own! But using English at home will give them the rare opportunity to simultaneously learn a second language to native proficiency.

    Over here, the locals frequently complement me on my local language skills, however it's sad to see that I all too frequently see people in English speaking countries criticising the English of immigrants who speak English far better than I speak my own second language. It's not just ignorant, it's arrogant.

  29. Re:Liberal idiots by hjf · · Score: 1

    So let me get this straight: you stole territory from another country, colonized their land, and somehow you're still mad that people from the area don't want to speak the language you forced upon them?
    Let's do the opposite. Russia and China nuke the US down. Now your territory is divided between the two. You're a Chinese citizen now. As a law-abiding citizen I EXPECT YOU to speak chinese at all times.

  30. Re:Liberal idiots by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Why does it even matter if English isn't the dominant language anyway? It's not like all the English speakers here are natives anyway. And not even all of the original 13 colonies were English speaking or founded by the English. They spoke Spanish in Southwest before English speakers showed up. Texas used to be a part of Mexico until the upstart gringos got pissed that they couldn't own slaves. The only American "culture" we have is what we've stolen and modified from other countries. If English declines in usage over time, it's no big deal.

  31. Re:Liberal idiots by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    And what's wrong with that? San Diego was originally founded by the Spanish conquistidors and later was a part of Mexico. El Paso used to be a city that straddled the border and the citizens freely walked back and forth until the border patrol beefed up its presence.

    What is so special about American culture anway? And why is a homogenous culture even remotely important?

    Virtually everyone in America has ancestors that came from somewhere else, and a very large number of US citizens were born in different cities or states than they were born in. If you aren't native American you really shouldn't be griping about other cultures showing up uninvited.

  32. Re:Liberal idiots by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    America was a backwards country for a very long time. It wasn't until WWI that the US was really taken seriously on the world stage. Muc of the early immigration came from countries that were just as civilized as the US, the immigrants were showing up because their home country had famines, economic slump, or they were from a group discriminated against at home. Outside of former British colonies, It wasn't until the economic boom in the US in the twentieth century that English become more popular.

  33. Re:Liberal idiots by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

    ...and that it's still not uncommon for many people today to have grandparents who grew up speaking Italian, German, Polish, Norwegian, etc. at home instead of English.

    /me waves

    My grandfather (born in the early 20th century) learned Yiddish from his parents at home, learned French from the rest of the neighborhood, and didn't learn English until he started school.

  34. Re:Liberal idiots by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    Not every immigrant family has an English-only policy at home, but I have interacted with enough people who grew up with that to conclude that it is not all that uncommon.

    The vast majority of the time, the grandchildren of immigrants are only fluent in English. Even without an "English only at home" rule. They might be able to converse a bit in another language, similar to someone who learned that language in high school.

  35. Re:Heh. Lingua franca. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Lingua Franca does not mean "French". It originally was used to refer to a pidjin language in common use in the eastern Mediterranean area from 11th century, which probably was more Italian based than French.

  36. translation services? by thePsychologist · · Score: 1

    Just because translations exist doesn't mean English is losing its edge. Virtually all top journals in pure sciences require publication in English. The one exception I've seen is French. Quite a few top math journals still allow French.

    --
    "What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us." Ralph Waldo Emerson
  37. Re:By the rivers of Babylon... by Dadoo · · Score: 1

    I took four years of Latin in high school, and I can tell you I learned more about the English language in Latin class, than I ever did in English class.

    --
    Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
  38. code written in Chinese by bigtreeman · · Score: 1

    Think about having English as your first language and maintaining code written in Chinese.

    --
    Go well
  39. Re:Modern American English by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
    200 years from now I bet Chinese and English will be influencing each other heavily

    You don't need to wait 200 years. It is happening now in parts of London. But it is not limited to Chinese and English.

    The reality is English's big advantage is it can easily adopt words from other languages, and the concepts that go with them. Many other languages cannot adopt words form other languages due to a variety of restrictive rules, and therefore lack the ability to benefit from access to ideas developed in other cultures.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  40. Re:English or American hegemony? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
    I think everybody in the world wanting/needing to do business with or in the US is the main reason why English is #1.

    Then you have drunk too much Trump Kool-ade.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  41. They might be tairsts or cormanusts by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Why the fuck do I care if the people at the next table in the restaurant are speaking Swahili or whatever? They're not talking to me.

    It's nice to know if they are talking ABOUT you.

    Probably best to shoot them anyway, just to be on the safe side.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  42. its advantages are eroding due to an increasingly by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    > its advantages are eroding due to an increasingly healthy research environment in China

    I have not heard stupider shit in ages.

    Kaveh Waddell, you are an imbecile and should consider self-imposed vow of silence.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  43. Re:Oxymoron, anyone? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    The English invented language. The English had Shakespeare and Socrates. Homer and Hemingway.

    And here's another thing - they all used plain ol' ascii. None of that poncy unicode shit.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  44. Re:Oxymoron, anyone? by tricorn · · Score: 1

    Mercedes Benz, the Cadillac of cars.

    (Red Wriggler, the Cadillac of worms)

  45. Re:About that... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure the Romans, French, Spanish, Germans... must have thought like this at some point

    Sure. At a point where there wasn't any television, movies, radio, printing presses, recorded music and ... I'm sure I'm missing something else but I can't quite put my finger on it.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."