Slashdot Mirror


Harvard Researchers Suggest Interstellar Object Might Have Been From Alien Civilization (bostonglobe.com)

A strange interstellar object that invaded our solar system and passed close to Earth in the fall of 2017 could have been an artificial object, a piece of a spacecraft from an alien civilization, Harvard researchers are suggesting in a new paper [PDF]. From a report: "There is data on the orbit of this object for which there is no other explanation. So we wrote this paper suggesting this explanation," said Professor Avi Loeb, chairman of the Harvard astronomy department. "The approach I take to the subject is purely scientific and evidence-based. As far as I know, there is no other explanation. You can rule it out or in, based on additional data." He said the study had been accepted for publication in the The Astrophysical Journal Letters on Nov. 12.

The paper, written by Loeb and postdoctoral researcher Shmuel Bialy, suggests the object might be a light sail, or solar sail -- a proposed method of powering spacecraft that uses a sail to catch radiation pressure and propel the spacecraft, just as a normal sail uses the wind to propel a boat. The object 'Oumuamua -- Hawaiian for "messenger from afar arriving first" -- is the first ever observed intruding in the orbits of our planets. It was picked up by telescopes in October 2017 at the University of Hawaii's Haleakala Observatory, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration said. It is on its way out of the solar system and expected to never return. Scientists say other "interstellar" objects may have sailed by in the past, undetected.

The object raised eyebrows. It was monitored for signs of radio signals as weak as one-tenth of a cellphone-strength signal, but nothing was detected. Researchers said in December 2017 that it appeared to be a naturally formed, icy object covered with a dry crust.
Further reading: Interstellar Visitor 'Oumuamua Is a Comet After All (June 2018), Scientists say mysterious 'Oumuamua' object could be an alien spacecraft, and Cigar-shaped interstellar object may have been an alien probe, Harvard paper claims.

162 comments

  1. Obligatory by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it was a cylinder sent by our humpback whale overlords.

    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure it was a cylinder sent by our humpback whale overlords.

      Kegger!

    3. Re: Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were the borg, resistance was not futile

    4. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks a lot like the Zentraedi flag ship from Robotech.

    5. Re:Obligatory by Tesen · · Score: 1

      So that whale sound I kept hearing last year was not my father in law rolling out of bed?

    6. Re: Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This site is SO GAY now.

    7. Re:Obligatory by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying it's aliens, but ... TFA is saying it's aliens.

    8. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ancient Aliens theorists say "yes" and point to this pile of rocks as proof of alien presence.

      Ancient alien theorists always say "yes", the round-heels of the theorist community

    9. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of Joe Rogan's stand-up, where he talks about his TV show where he interviewed sasquatch hunters... And how he decided that it was easier for him to just go along when these people told their stories, where sasquatch activity was always considered the most likely explanation for everything.

    10. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mulari?

  2. Until by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    the mothership arrives, then we'll all be sorry for not listening to Dr Quack!

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  3. Researchers said in December 2017 that it appeared to be a naturally formed, icy object covered with a dry crust.

    They must be SUPER advanced to cause their object to naturally form like that!!!

    1. Re:Woah by jd · · Score: 1

      If you wanted to travel to another solar system in a generation ship, would you build one from scratch or hollow out something suitable?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Woah by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Would something you "hollow out" be anything like an optimal shape for maximising area of rotational pseudo-gravity interior surface versus external mass of radiation shielding (bagged dirt)? Personally, I'd suspect that the near-optimal strategy would be to reconstruct a (small) nickel-iron rich asteroid into your habitat then wrap it with (bagged) debris from another dirty-snowball to put something like 10m water-equivalent of radiation-shielding between the population and the outside universe. Since most of the fime-of-flight would be in the "dark of outer space" (cue Star Trek style voiceover), optimising the shape to use "free" "sun"-light to feet the plants would probably be a WOMBAT.

      I suppose I'd better RTFA before commenting further. But a 10:1 end-over-end light curve does not sound very optimal to me.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    3. Re:Woah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would something you "hollow out" be anything like an optimal shape for maximising area of rotational pseudo-gravity interior surface (...)

      We could estimate their body structure based on the amount of G's the tumbling asteroid provides. It looks like it is more than 1 G, so the aliens must be BIG, like their planet.

    4. Re:Woah by RockDoctor · · Score: 2
      Fair comment. Normally I don't read ACs.

      Size estimates for 'Oumuamua range from 230m to 1000m - 240m being the commonest. Rotation periods are given as 6.96 and 8.1 hours (that's 417.6 and 486 minutes respectively, because my space-station designing toolbox works in RPM). For 230m, the rotation rates give 7.4*10^-07 and -5.4*10^-07 g. For 240m, the rotation rates give 7.7*10^-07 and 5.7*10^-07 g. For 1000m, the rotation rates give 32.1*10^-07 and 20.4*10^-07 g.

      So, we can deduce using your argument that the 'Oumuamua-ians developed their physiology in micro-g gravity fields. That's down in the "ISS during tepid manoeuvrers" level.

      Nice idea. I don't think it helps though.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    5. Re:Woah by jd · · Score: 1

      You certainly wouldn't optimize the shape to feed the plants. You're either using hydroponics or a Biosphere II with artificial lighting inside. You'd have to. Whether you could pull off a Rendezvous With Rama-style dormancy is unclear, but frankly I don't see any advantage to it. If you're going the Biosphere II route, you need some decking, some artificial lighting, power and pumps for artificial circulation. There, you'd need gravity. If you're opting for hydroponics, why bother? The plants won't care.

      I'm thinking of casually stealing your idea for a short story, though, as that's probably one one the best solutions I've seen. That ok?

      If you've that much shielding, then your primary problem is getting rid of excess heat. I wonder if that could be used, in some way. Just direct the IR in a relatively tight beam. It wouldn't be significant, but it would be free. Regardless, the more you have of anything, the more heat that generates. You can't scale below a certain point without losing sustainability, so there's a minimum heat. You can't scale the total above the point where you can get rid of the heat. If the minimum exceeds the maximum, the design is impossible with that technology.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:Woah by jd · · Score: 1

      Actually, it might.

      It says that it's very unlikely any occupants are active and about. The only realistic way to have occupants with such low gravity for such prolonged periods of time is in some form of suspended animation. Frozen, it wouldn't matter what the gravity was like.

      To answer whether this is viable, we need the centre of rotation versus the centre of mass (ie: is it a uniform mass) and we need to know the probable density (you'd be looking at something that is filled with something considerably denser than air, you need mostly atmosphere if it's a generation ship). In both cases, the density would be markedly lower than you'd get if it was solid rock or even a rubble pile.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    7. Re:Woah by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      There, you'd need gravity. If you're opting for hydroponics, why bother? The plants won't care.

      Plants grow well without a gravity feed? Well, if you're growing algal feedstock for a "food synthesiser" (what is the Unobtanium budget for one of those? Or does it use Handwavium?), maybe not. Otherwise, for something resembling a balanced diet for the crew (assuming most of the colony-building animals are shipped as gametes, and a small number of live animals for use as wombs on arrival), you're going to need a variety of plant types.

      Unless you have a drive of novel physics (again, what is the Handwavium/ Unobtanium ratio?), the only pseudogravity you're going to get is by rotating. So ... it's either the inside of a sphere or a cylinder (or several cylinders, for isolation in the event of leaks/ disease outbreaks). How much you allocate to agriculture and how much to inhabitation / maintenance is where your optimisation options lay.

      Whether you could pull off a Rendezvous With Rama-style dormancy is unclear

      Is there any significant biology to support this being possible for large (centimetre-plus) organisms. I've been watching the science press for about 4 decades now, and seen nothing that classifies as "science" rather than "fiction". It's dead popular in fiction, I agree. In something resembling the real world, I see no evidence that it would be possible. Which leaves doing it the slow, generation-ship way as the available option. With a fusion power plant (itself pretty hairily close to Handwavium-plated Unobtanium) and something on a Rama-esque scale, it's doable. But the original departees would have been forgotten by the ship residents (along with this "living on a planet" lark) long before arrival at anywhere. Not good fiction material.

      I'm thinking of casually stealing your idea for a short story, though, as that's probably one one the best solutions I've seen. That ok?

      I've lifted most of it from the 1975 NASA report on space habitats. (Various places. Try http://www.nss.org/settlement/... ) Steal away, I did.

      If you've that much shielding, then your primary problem is getting rid of excess heat.

      "That much shielding" is equivalent to about an Earth atmosphere - which is the only shielding system with a million-year testing programme behind it. Unless ... you've got a shielding system with a two million-year track record? Tell me more!

      The inner surface of the shielding will all be in contact with the bags of water and/or rock which initially be at Asteroid Belt temperatures. Say, 100K. As it warms up (during construction/ flight trials) you'll get the thermal balance checked out. You might need active heat dumping (radiators and ... maybe ammonia/CO2/water coolant fluid? Extract from some of the shielding if you need top-up en route, but you should be able to out-engineer that sort of problem. Minor leaks your biosphere microbes should be able to process into crops.) I doubt that excessive heat buildup or loss would be major issues, but again that's something you'd address in detail engineering. This is more like nautical science (I've sweltered and frozen inside different vessels from the sub-Arctic to the Tropics.) than rocket science. Insulation adjustment on the skin when vacuum is free and your shielding is cold and attached in relatively small lumps, multiply layered isn't challenging.

      I wonder if that could be used, in some way. Just direct the IR in a relatively tight beam.

      Not with any physics I know of. Or that I can bring to mind in several years of thinking along these lines.

      Regardless, [...] If the minimum exceeds the maximum, the design is impossible with that technology.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  4. Occam's razor by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not to be a downer but a far simpler explanation is that it just had an unusual manner of outgassing possibly due to the volatiles being below the surface and taking longer to heat.

    1. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not to be a downer but a far simpler explanation is that it just had an unusual manner of outgassing possibly due to the volatiles being below the surface and taking longer to heat.

      Let's see your numbers, bro. From the article:

      "Oumuamua shows no signs of a any cometary activity, no cometary tail, nor gas emission/absorption lines were observed (Meech et al. 2017; Knight et al. 2017; Jewitt et al. 2017; Ye et al. 2017; Fitzsimmons et al. 2017). From a theoretical point of view, Rafikov (2018) has shown that if outgassing was responsible for the acceleration (as originally proposed by Micheli et al. 2018), then the associated outgassing torques would have driven a rapid evolution in ‘Oumuamua’s spin, incompatible with observations."

    2. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was an alien spaceship because what else could it be? SCIENCE

    3. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's opposed to a magical solar sail that maintains orientation without attitude control ?

    4. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, but as prior commentor noted, show your math.

      At that suggestion, it would have to be an object light enough that the solar shockwave pushed it back out of the solar system, but didn't cause enough heat to vaporize an outer shell of the object, in an observable spectrum?

      Seriously. Once you get beyond occam's razor, which is what the author is really arguing beyond, looking at this scientifically and social commentary damned, this doesn't make sense and is led to rather extreme observation with the physics and chemistry we know.

    5. Re:Occam's razor by Mark+of+the+North · · Score: 1

      Yes, and that's exactly what the paper's authors looked at.

      However, this is a draft paper, and hasn't made it through the peer-review process. I've had a couple of papers that were drastically transformed by the peer-review process. It would be interesting to track down this paper if it gets published. My bet is that the suggestion of an artificial explanation to the acceleration will be very much toned down, if not removed entirely.

    6. Re:Occam's razor by RockDoctor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Let's see your numbers, bro.

      I haven't been keeping a count, but I do read the daily listings of new papers on Arxiv and I'm more or less up to date (one submission on my desktop at this time) there have been on the order of a dozen proposals from various sources trying various models of tholin/ dust crusting the surface of 'Oumuamua. While it's not exactly an exciting position to take, it is a consensus position.

      Do your own homework. I have, to match the extent that I care about the topic.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    7. Re:Occam's razor by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      That's opposed to a magical solar sail that maintains orientation without attitude control ?

      So your ruler is technology that we can understand?

      Anyway, the OP didn't say anything about a solar sail. They just rightly pointed out the outgassing theory was already considered and abandoned.

    8. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the Aliens of the Gap argument: whenever there is a hole in our understanding of the clothing market, aliens are there to cover us.

  5. It might have been. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It might have been alien, but almost certainly wasn't.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:It might have been. by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Funny

      It might have been alien, but almost certainly wasn't.

      You're not going to be landing a largish research grant with that attitude.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:It might have been. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Should've said it had a chance of changing our climate. That always works.

    3. Re:It might have been. by Sique · · Score: 1

      It works even better if you claim that it is proof that only natural causes change the climate.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    4. Re:It might have been. by sheramil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Did it come from Earth?

      No?

      Then it's alien.

    5. Re:It might have been. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either way it's clear anything 'climate' gets grants when you are not interested in science but in politics.

    6. Re:It might have been. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if it'd hit us it's certainly have altered the climate. Does that count?

    7. Re:It might have been. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it come from Earth?

      No?

      Then it's alien.

      Probably didn't get a work permit, either.

  6. They decoded the message too. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny

    Message to Heavens Gate STOP Pick up delayed STOP Delayed by 19 orbits around your star STOP Thanks, Your SpaceUberPilot R2D2C3PO STOP.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:They decoded the message too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow.. that was really hilarious.

    2. Re:They decoded the message too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot two parts: Permission granted to use us to appear stupid before elections STOP For minimization of impact of political statements among general population STOP.

    3. Re:They decoded the message too. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      And please don't forget the Washington DC passengers STOP

    4. Re:They decoded the message too. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Really? I would have guessed either "Never gonna give you up" or "Be sure to drink your Ovaltine."

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  7. A light sail would be visible by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If it deployed a light sail upon leaving the solar system, the sail would be reflecting sunlight back at us now. A sail big enough to accelerate an object of that size would be visible.

    1. Re:A light sail would be visible by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If it deployed a light sail upon leaving the solar system, the sail would be reflecting sunlight back at us now. A sail big enough to accelerate an object of that size would be visible.

      Nobody has suggested that. The suggestion is that it could be a discarded piece of an old light sail.

      I just happened to read the paper yesterday, and we're here dozens of comments in and nobody commenting has read it.

      The jokes are amusing but assuming what the paper says and reacting to it is a less useful application of time that reading it (and maybe not even taking the time for reacts, if one must choose) or just cracking stupid jokes.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:A light sail would be visible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SLASHDOT

    3. Re:A light sail would be visible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You must be new here

    4. Re:A light sail would be visible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The suggestion is that it could be a discarded piece of an old light sail.

      Or...

      There are other possible explanations for this acceleration, like magnetic interaction with the solar wind, pressure from solar radiation, and forces of drag and friction. But the researchers ruled these out.

      This leaves the remaining explanation that 'Oumuamua is propelled partially by gas, which would indicate that it is a comet.

      So, the space.com article from June already debunked the Slashdot article from today. It's in the "further reading" section at the bottom, so there is really no excuse for this idiocy.

    5. Re:A light sail would be visible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the space.com article from June already debunked the Slashdot article from today. It's in the "further reading" section at the bottom, so there is really no excuse for this idiocy.

      Or... that's what they want us to think.

      (</s> if it wasn't obvious)

    6. Re:A light sail would be visible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why it ignored our existence, to find a more interesting solar system. Travel a trillion miles at near speed of light then what? bunch of two legged creatures calling it Omamaua.

    7. Re:A light sail would be visible by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      Problem with could is that it also be could not. It's an interesting object with some unique properties (not confirmed to be unusual because first of its type) and to put an alien spin on it is an attention seeking activity even among scientists. That attention seeking warrants jokes and moreso at the expense of the scientists that mention aliens seriously in any academic paper (unless they have definitive proof of course).

      What we have is a first of its kind observation of a celestial occurrence that should occur fairly regularly with some cool/surprising attributes.

      Unless we decide to worship it as a god of something... Besides dead people and election propaganda what happens in October (month of discovery)? Maybe the dead are Aliens on a different plane sent to confuse this life with election mail! I could worship this. As an alien plane or an aero-plane for the speech impaired. Oumuamua is appeasing to all speech empowerments.

    8. Re:A light sail would be visible by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      I find your lack of faith troubling. No evidence means it *could* be Aliens. Or Bigfoot. Or the Lockness Monster. Or the Lizard People. Or the Flat Bread Earth (Space Pizza Earth for the un-educated American scrubs).

      Didn't you see their credentials? Any person shouldn't be discouraged by "evidence" when dealing with matters of faith in credentials.

    9. Re:A light sail would be visible by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's clearly an alien spacecraft that got hulled and tumbled out uncontrollably into space in a battle long ago. Over the millennia it's been floating through space it simply iced over and collected dust. Either that or the Arachnids missed us, those stupid bugs.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    10. Re:A light sail would be visible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignore parent. They got their dates mixed up.

      It's more than 13 days on the count of it being 2017 vs 2018.

    11. Re:A light sail would be visible by habig · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's on arxiv. It's almost certainly trash.

      ... and it's been accepted by ApJ letters, so it's almost certainly not.

      It literally says:

      "On October 19, 2017, the first interstellar object in the Solar System, âOumuamua (1I/2017 U1) was discovered by the PAN-STARRS1 survey"

      The paper is dated November 1st. In 13 days these people have looked at the FIRST EVER INTERSTELLAR OBJECT that we've literally only just been able to detect and come to the conclusion that it can only reasonably be part of an alien civilisation's UFO. With no context, alternative, or data beyond orbit and periodicity.

      It's bunk.

      Just in case you haven't realized it yet, 1 Nov. 2018 is 1 year and 13 days after 19 October, 2017.

      The analysis of the extra orbital acceleration matches a 1/r^2 force. In regular comets, that's solar powered outgassing. Or, solar radiation pressure, if the thing is of the right form factor. No evidence of outgassing has been seen. I'm less clear how you get fit that form factor into the observations, but ok. The bulk of the paper, however, is an interesting analysis of how beat up a thin flat thing might get while traveling through interstellar space, something, say, their Breathrough Prize funders are pretty interested in knowing regardless (go google "Breakthrough Starshot"). The breathless "Alien!" headlines are mostly tacked on by places like Slashdot. The actual title of the paper is "COULD SOLAR RADIATION PRESSURE EXPLAIN ‘OUMUAMUA’S PECULIAR ACCELERATION?" (all caps coming from the journal's latex format, not me).

      Read more carefully before spraying out "bunk" accusations. You'd make a really bad referee, good thing this paper got some decent ones instead.

    12. Re:A light sail would be visible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's on arxiv. It's almost certainly trash.

      arxiv is far from "trash," it's the only place with good papers anymore because all reputable scientists embrace open science.

    13. Re:A light sail would be visible by gtall · · Score: 1

      My own view is that it is a giant Space Monkey turd. C'mon, elongated shape, weird trajectory, no identifying marks. The fellow just launched it here about 100 million years ago to buzz our solar system as a prank.

    14. Re:A light sail would be visible by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      I choose to believe in Space Monkey Turds and a Flying Space Pizza. Not because it is easy with evidence. But because it is hard to convince the non-believers that I am correct.

    15. Re:A light sail would be visible by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Yeah, trying to use your braincell on Slashdot sometimes feels like a waste of effort. http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargo...

      (I'm about a third of the way through reading the paper, and I decided to check for substantive comment here. Depressing, isn't it?)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    16. Re:A light sail would be visible by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 0

      If it deployed a light sail upon leaving the solar system, the sail would be reflecting sunlight back at us now.

      The advanced alien sail technology is constructed of dark matter and powered by dark energy.

      A sail big enough to accelerate an object of that size would be visible.

      You need to apply the definitions of real and virtual here:

      If it's there, and you can see it . . . it's real.

      If it's not there, but you can see it . . . it's virtual.

      If it's not there, and you can't see it . . . it's gone.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    17. Re:A light sail would be visible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did not once mention Natalie Portman.

    18. Re:A light sail would be visible by vix86 · · Score: 1

      Right, but unless we're supposing nature makes light sail capable material naturally...

      Humans haven't launched enough light sails for it be our trash, so its somebody else's trash in space most likely and the paper does suggest that.

  8. Oumuamua Passes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Extra-solar, possibly artificial object passes through solar system. Trump declares formation of Space Marines. Coincidence?

    Get the tinfoil hats on, boys, the invasion is on the way!

    1. Re:Oumuamua Passes by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Extra-solar, possibly artificial object passes through solar system. Trump declares formation of Space Marines. Coincidence?

      Get the tinfoil hats on, boys, the invasion is on the way!

      Meh! He'd demand that the aliens build a wall around our solar system at their expense.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Oumuamua Passes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but not really mean it. He'd have an agreement with the aliens to keep earth in line for the invasion as long as they didn't contradict his bluster and praised him from time to time.

    3. Re: Oumuamua Passes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What chapter is he creating, Blood Angels? Or All of them?

      Maybe Trump(et) Angels
      ?

  9. Elon by kiwioddBall · · Score: 1

    Get Elon to chase it down.

    1. Re:Elon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, that's the last thing anyone needs. A stoned businessman who doles out comments about "pedoguys" while simultaneously palling around with the likes of Peter "We Suck Young Blood" Thiel.

      The only way it could be worse is if he was chasing it down in a Tesla running on Autopilot at the time, judging by how effective that's been he'd just wind up in the side of a building or running over pedestrians.

      Musk isn't some paragon to the scientific community, he's just another snake-oil scumbag businessman.

    2. Re:Elon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The only way it could be worse is if he was chasing it down in a Tesla"

      You do realise Elon's Tesla Roadster passed beyond the orbit of Mars last week?

    3. Re:Elon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just jealous because Musk got to fuck Amber Heard and you never will.

    4. Re:Elon by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      He can't - he's lost the keys to his Tesla.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    5. Re:Elon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get Elon to chase it down.

      Actually, it came here for that free Tesla out by Mars.

  10. That's no moooooooon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll show myself out.

  11. No intelligent life found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Obviously it was alien and in search of intelligence and it just passed us by.

    1. Re:No intelligent life found by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is coming back with reinforcements.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    2. Re:No intelligent life found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously it was alien and in search of intelligence and it just passed us by.

      The mother ship deployed the invading soldiers shortly before perihelion. Expect their arrival anytime now.

    3. Re:No intelligent life found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plot twist: they use carbon-based fuels and turned around because they saw us adopting photovoltaic panels

    4. Re:No intelligent life found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll just leave this here:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  12. Giant Space Turd by fuzznutz · · Score: 2

    I don't know but it looked like a giant dump from Omicron Persei 8.

    1. Re: Giant Space Turd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe... Just maybe... The spaceship.. Hearth of gold... That improbability drive can make it look like anything

    2. Re:Giant Space Turd by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Well, after they ate all those barrels of chalky candy hearts - that was probably the most likely outcome.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Giant Space Turd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any image you might have seen wasn't one of the object - they were artists' impressions. They tell an artist what they know (oval-shaped rocky object) and the artist runs with it.

  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. Say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not science based to say "We can't prove it wasn't aliens, so it might be"

    You can't prove god isn't a spaghetti monster either, so I guess you should believe it.

  15. We know it's not Rama by quonset · · Score: 1

    The object is neither long enough or wide enough to hold a multitude of species. Nor was its approach to the Sun close enough to allow the Frozen Sea to melt. Finally, when it dove out of the orbital plane, it never accelerated sharply.

    Thus, we can safely say it is not a Raman design. Besides, we didn't have any spacecraft capable of intercepting it and having people explore it.

  16. If aliens by neurophys · · Score: 1

    I don't know if I will believe in the aliens idea, but if it is it may be:
    1. A spaceship with hairdressers and Telephone cleaners (Hitchhiker guide to the Galaxy)
    2. Aliens looking for intelligent life somewhere and they just by change passed near us.
    3. Aleins detected signals around this solar system and were exploring Venus or Jupiter
    4. Aliens have found us, and have alreadyy sent down a landing capsule to Earth loaded with explorerer

    1. Re:If aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a long lost artillery shell.

  17. Clearly they didn't get a close enough look. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a baby one of these that didn't eat enough.

    https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/stexpanded/images/a/a8/Doomsday_Machine.jpg

  18. Re:It's a rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Also, the closer you get to the galactic center the more volatile to life the environment gets. As such, life has more time to grow and advance the further one is from the galactic core

    That's quite an assumption. A more violent environment (assuming you meant violent and not volatile) might also be a driving force behind faster evolution.

    For example, on earth the great extinctions actually sped up the evolution. Without them (or better: in between them) evolution went relative slow.

    Of course, you don't want a bunch of supernova's and gamma rays ionizing any atom on the planet all the time, but a more `challenging` environment might as well speed up evolution instead of slowing it down. We just don't know yet until we increase our current sample size of 1.

    (posting as anon as i modded a bit in the topic already)

  19. Re: Thought experiment, B) Light energy is kinetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fucking stop. Now.

  20. Re:It's a rock by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Earth didn't develop complex life until things calmed down here. From our current working sample set (size: 1) it's reasonable to assume that you need a less chaotic environment to develop life. You might need a moon to stir things up, though.

    It's just another kind of goldilocks zone.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  21. Doesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the papers they rely on heavily (Micheli, et al) states the following:"After ruling out solar-radiation pressure, drag- and friction-like forces, interaction with solar wind for a highly magnetized object, and geometric effects originating from ‘Oumuamua potentially being composed of several spatially separated bodies or having a pronounced offset between its photocentre and centre of mass, we find comet-like outgassing to be a physically viable explanation, provided that ‘Oumuamua has thermal properties similar to comets."
    That is, they ruled out solar radiation pressure but that is exactly what this work is claiming to cause the differential acceleration.

  22. Aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the object starts singing whale songs I'll be concerned, until then it's just another piece of rock flying through space which somehow didn't get trapped in an orbit, and managed to get spoted.

  23. What They're Not Saying by seven+of+five · · Score: 0

    It is unfortunately the first in a gigantic 'caravan' of alien immigrants.
    Among them are drug dealers and gang members.
    Many are pregnant and will deposit their fertilized eggs on American soil.
    The only solution is to build a wall around the entire Earth.

    1. Re:What They're Not Saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly, this is a job for Space Force (..orce, ...orce, ...orce)!

    2. Re:What They're Not Saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is unfortunately the first in a gigantic 'caravan' of alien immigrants.
      Among them are drug dealers and gang members.
      Many are pregnant and will deposit their fertilized eggs on American soil.
      The only solution is to build a DYSON SPHERE around the entire SOLAR SYSTEM.

      FTFY

  24. Simpler question: What is Winter Sunlight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For this reason, God sends them a powerful delusion(operation of wandering)(planet) so that they will believe the lie.

  25. We're living the plot for "Rendezvous with Rama" by Lisandro · · Score: 1

    Look it up if you haven't already. Great book.

  26. Re:It's a rock by tigersha · · Score: 1

    So did social development. There is a lot of evidence that the sudden flooding of the Black Sea caused a major impulse in civilisation.

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  27. Wat? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
    I'm not certain how useful a solar sail would be on a device that came from another solar system. Yaknow, there's that interstellar space between thier system and ours.

    Meanwhile the "Ancient Aliens" crowd just orgasmed with this BS.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Wat? by dissy · · Score: 1

      I'm not certain how useful a solar sail would be on a device that came from another solar system.

      To be a solar system implies having a star. A solar sail in another solar system with a star would be just as useful as a solar sail within our own solar system.

      The fact such a thing would eventually end up leaving the solar system it was originally in shouldn't be assumed to be intentional so much as a fact of nature.
      All of the probes we have ever sent out so far will have that same fate, and the voyagers may have already done so depending where you put the edge of the solar system to be. In a few million years however they will most certainly have left our solar system no matter your definition.

      I'm sure the voyagers will get beaten to hell over such a trip no matter if they enter another solar system in that time or not, similar to how this object has been beaten to hell prior to entering ours.

      I wouldn't call the voyagers useless despite this being a fact of their fate, they were quite useful in data collection long ago prior to heading out of the solar system against some peoples desires.

      If one was to presume this object was actually created intentionally by something, it could very well have been just as useful, or at least I don't see any reason why not.

      The only real difference is most of us are going to assume it was created naturally by forces of nature, and not intentionally by an intelligence.
      There's no evidence of either, it's just that the former we know can and does happen, while the latter we do not.

      A good reason to assume certainly, but one still shouldn't call an assumption evidence.

    2. Re:Wat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a few million years however they will most certainly have left our solar system no matter your definition.

      In one million years, Voyager(s) will have traveled ~51 light years.

  28. Re:It's a rock by sfcat · · Score: 1

    Earth didn't develop complex life until things calmed down here. From our current working sample set (size: 1) it's reasonable to assume that you need a less chaotic environment to develop life. You might need a moon to stir things up, though.

    It's just another kind of goldilocks zone.

    The moon actually keeps things calm down here on Earth. Its a self-balancing mechanism that prevents the Earth's movements from doing anything too radical.

    --
    "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
  29. Why does God need a starship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just saying.

    1. Re: Why does God need a starship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the gods pranged his chariot.

  30. Where was it from? by johannesg · · Score: 2

    We know its current course and speed, so if you extrapolate into the distant past, does it cross the orbit of any nearby star?

    1. Re:Where was it from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't be bothered looking them up but there are at least three papers out there which do that very thing.

    2. Re:Where was it from? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Stars move. Our distance estimates have uncertainty to them, and the glare of each star's light introduces an uncertainty in their angular position measurement. In short, over the many millennia of travel, we don't know the previous positions of nearby stars well enough to constrain 'Oumuamua's path well enough. Yes, astrometry is improving (see, for example, Gaia data release 2). No, it is not adequate to that task, and probably never will be, because there is dark (sense : not luminous) stuff too, in sufficient quantities to render the project ... impracticable.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  31. Hey, you got slashdot in my coast-to-coast am by Potor · · Score: 2
  32. I suggested this last year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was the classic cigar shaped UFO.

  33. Re:We're living the plot for "Rendezvous with Rama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except for the "having a spaceship that can actually go there" part.

  34. To-MAY-to / To-MAH-to by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    Kah-Meht

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  35. xkcd.com by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    It was monitored for signs of radio signals as weak as one-tenth of a cellphone-strength signal, but nothing was detected.

    Obligatory...

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  36. Re:We're living the plot for "Rendezvous with Rama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shame that the follow-up novels were so bad.

  37. Paging Elon Musk! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How far is SpaceX away from being able to cobble up a flyby probe to at least get a close look at this object?

    1. Re:Paging Elon Musk! by painandgreed · · Score: 2

      How far is SpaceX away from being able to cobble up a flyby probe to at least get a close look at this object?

      Probably not possible. Oumaumua is traveling at 26 km/s at infinity. So far, the fastest space craft we've made is the Parker Probe which was only 21 km/s while diving towards the sun. So, it's traveling faster than anything else we've managed (Voyagers are in the upper teens for km/s) to send into space. I have my doubts on the current Falcon Heavy being able to get any faster. The BFR might, but it's years out, but it's such a faint object that Oumuamua might be too far out to keep track of by that time if it continues to have an erratic movement.

    2. Re:Paging Elon Musk! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      A few dozen astronomic units ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:Paging Elon Musk! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      But now consider SpaceX’s rate of technological progress. I could live to see that object captured and retrieved to star in a future, Earth-orbiting addition to the Smithsonian.

    4. Re:Paging Elon Musk! by neoRUR · · Score: 1

      Well there is this ION drive that NASA has that should be fast enough.
      https://www.nasa.gov/centers/g...

  38. Re:But were they Illegal Aliens? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "Build a Dyson Wall around them and make the Andromedians pay for it! It's a caravan full of bad bleepniks, believe me! They'll stick their slimy blue tentacles up your family's down-there-parts while you sleep and do harm not covered by lame Obamacare. Bigly sad! #MakeGalaxyGreatAgain"

  39. Re:It's a rock by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

    Time dilation due to Sagittarius A* is only experienced at extremely close distances to its event horizon. S2, the closest known star to Sagittarius A*, at a distance of ~1000 AU experiences time dilation of less than 0.1% (that's one tenth of 1%)

  40. Diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would appear that Harvard needs to reconsider its diversity criteria in hiring also, not just admissions.

  41. More info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not mentioned in the /. summary:
    -the object entered our solar system with a greater velocity than could be explained by the gravitational pull of our sun.
    -the object accelerated on it's way out of our solar system.
    -two possible jets of material were detected emerging from the object.

    Also, some scientists have pointed to the tumbling motion of the elongated object as an indication that it was not artificially controlled..... but wouldn't that actually be a great way of reducing possible alarm over a probe's approach?

    Just saying.... very interesting set of circumstances.

    1. Re:More info... by mcswell · · Score: 1

      "the object entered our solar system with a greater velocity than could be explained by the gravitational pull of our sun" Huh? What does the Sun's gravitational pull have to do with it? The object was not sitting out at some point stationary relative to the Sun, and then started falling. It was already moving when it began to feel the Sun's pull. So *naturally* it's speed was greater than the speed that an object would acquire just by falling towards the Sun.

      "the object accelerated on it's way out of our solar system": True, although not by a huge amount; it was consistent with out-gassing that comets undergo, so a tiny amount. Certainly not what one would expect from a space ship.

      "two possible jets of material were detected emerging from the object": Everything I've heard is that this was NOT the case. Citation?

  42. Perhaps Christians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps Christians can begin worshiping this thing, at least it showed up and proved its existence within the past 2000 years... a much better track record than this "Jesus" legend.
    Anon for obvious reasons, the primitives might throw rocks... historically they have become enraged when questioning why they believe in something with less evidence than Spider-Man... poor fools...

    1. Re:Perhaps Christians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Anon for obvious reasons, the primitives might throw rocks...

      No worries. There are no women in the audience! ;-)

  43. Re:We're living the plot for "Rendezvous with Rama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think this Oumuamua case is more similar to a short story in the collection of "Pirx the Pilot" by Stanislaw Lem. In that an alien mega ship wreck flies right through the solar system but due to general incompetence and lack of attention it becomes too late to give chase while the object moves out at 3rd cosmic speed.

  44. Corporations Are People Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you expect from Harvard?

  45. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are we sure real science people are claiming this? or some business or economic "scientific"* researchers, I know that sometimes Harvard should not be taken seriously.

  46. Nothing stops it by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From being just a rock and a spaceship.

    If you wanted to fly to the stars, you'd need a ship with a very thick hull to handle galactic background radiation. If you wanted to go slow, you'd also make it a generation ship, which means you need something very large for the population and life support.

    That's simply not very practical to build. But why build? Find an asteroid on an extreme elliptical orbit, hollow it out, and use the interior for your ship. Walls already made for you, and you've extracted ore you can use to make floors, engines, etc.

    It probably was just a fragment from two planets colliding, but the assumption that it couldn't have been that plus a spaceship is flawed.

    The lack of signal isn't an issue. Why would a generation ship transmit signals? Who would it transmit to? Space is very big, after all, and radio is very slow. With walls thick enough to shield against galactic winds, nothing on the inside would have reached Earth.

    Only way we could have known for sure would be to have put a lander on it. But there's a distinct lack of space probes capable of such redirected missions. Thank you, American tax payer. Arthur C. Clarke would have been fuming. The good news is that the builders of Rama do everything in threes.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Nothing stops it by RockDoctor · · Score: 2

      If you wanted to fly to the stars, you'd need a ship with a very thick hull to handle galactic background radiation.

      Only about a dozen metres of water-ice. Down to around 5m for a 50-50 ice-rock dust mix. Not trivial, but not horrendous.

      The odds of meeting something large enough to fragment ... well, 'Oumuamua got here after an uncertain (but probably very long) travel, so ... low enough. Send two, travelling outside their mutual ballistic debris cones.

      Walls already made for you, and you've extracted ore you can use to make floors, engines, etc.

      My suspicion would be that you'd have to do so much mining and making space to actually build things inside your putative asteroid ... that demolishing the original asteroid and completely rebuilding it would be quicker. You could then engineer for rotation sufficient to give an endurable pseudogravity for indefinite travel.

      Thank you, American tax payer. Arthur C. Clarke would have been fuming.

      But he'd do it politely and sarcastically. Being a British WW2 radar developer.

      The good news is that the builders of Rama do everything in threes.

      So, on the way in 'Oumuamua dropped two von Neumann factories, and will drop another on the way out. Give it a couple of thousand years for them to make the system habitable (for not-necessarily-human values of "habitable") and the next ship will be along.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    2. Re:Nothing stops it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And also, removing mass changes the orbit.

    3. Re:Nothing stops it by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      removing mass changes the orbit.

      So?

      You're indulging in a decades-long free-space rebuilding of an asteroid. You've got in-space engineering down pat long before you do that.

      And you'd not move most of the material more then a few km while building your spacecraft. You'll also be building motors at the same time and place. And turning the volatiles of the "donor" asteroid into pumpable reaction mass. For the engines. Which will need testing.

      To "remove" mass implies giving it enough energy to move it out of the gravity of the rest of the asteroid. Why waste that energy? Literally.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  47. Re:We're living the plot for "Rendezvous with Rama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rama was a Sphere, not a cylinder and was rotating. It had 3 small (compared to it's size) cylinders on a small flat circle, where the entrance/exit was so a ship can wedge against them when docked.

  48. Someone, anyone, please rename Uranus. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I do mean yours, not mine. Thank you.

  49. Poor sample set by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've essentially been *blind* to objects like this previously.

    So this being the first one, virtually guarantees we lack the context and knowledge to "properly" categorize it.

    Its shape is weird.

    Its acceleration is weird.

    Its incoming angle is weird.

    Also, it's shape makes no sense as a solar sail?

    And it is now out of range of all our observations forever.

    Scientists should stick to hypothesises testable with the gathered data.

    "We don't know what it is" is much, much better than "Aliens.".

  50. Re:We're living the plot for "Rendezvous with Rama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    written by a paedo, so logically of no literary merit

  51. Please... take our leader. by cpotoso · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please... take our leader.

  52. Re:It's a rock by RockDoctor · · Score: 2
    But the Moon also appreciably increases the Earth's impact cross section by widening the effective gravity field from the 1/r^2 of a simple system.

    There is an awful lot of extrapolation done from the sample of one evolutionary system that we have, and happen to be living in the middle of. And a lot of awful extrapolation.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  53. Engaging in pure speculation by sinequonon · · Score: 1

    This is an irreproducable result that is impossible to test. Hence it's not science. One can make up any sort of supposition in these cases. At best we can only wait for another such occurrence and see if we can collect better data.

    --
    -Bob-
    1. Re:Engaging in pure speculation by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      "Next time you're visited
      By little green aliens,
      They're not there unless
      They come back twice a week."

      -- Dr. Jane, "A Scientist Looks At Things That Don't Exist".

  54. Re:It's a rock by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Yeah. Uh, there is a lot of discussion on that suggestion. Whether the seismic (you know, the original data on which the whole proposition is based) actually supports Ryan and Pitman's original interpretation of one catastrophic flooding event remains very much a topic of debate. There are certainly multiple scour channels on the Black Sea side of the Bosphorus, though what the levels of the Bosphorus were for each scouring event is ... very debatable. Let alone their dating, absolute and relative.

    Yeah, it's an interesting question. I spent some days on it while working in the Black Sea a couple of years back. As far as I can tell (and I am tens of thousands of hours of experience short of claiming to be an "expert" in seismic interpretation), the data just isn't sufficient to decide if there was one flood event, or many smaller ones. Feel free to upfront the costs for a seabed corer, boat, crew and permission to block the traffic of one of the most congested sea lanes of the world. The permission would be the hard bit. And very expensive.

    Oh, by the way, if it happened, it probably didn't affect the development of civilisation in China, India, or Central America very much. Fertile Crescent - much more credible. Egypt, so-so.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  55. Holy Mathematical Masturbation, Batman. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy mathematical masturbation, Batman! That's a whole lot of complicated looking math for someone who's basically claiming "it was aliens".

    It looks sciency though. Doesn't it?

  56. Re: We're living the plot for "Rendezvous with Ram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Rama was a cylinder not a sphere. RTF book!
    Page 12 50km x 20km.

  57. ugh. Such poor reporting... by ripvlan · · Score: 2

    /. fell for it too. I think Ars has a good write up of the click-bait news cycle on this one. The paper is pages long and goes into great detail. Then on the last line "could be aliens too" and that's all people read.

    Bloggers vs Science Writers.

    "Predictably, online media go nuts over ‘Oumuamua and Harvard scientists"
    https://arstechnica.com/scienc...

  58. Capital offence : RTFA by RockDoctor · · Score: 1, Informative
    Not the "done thing", I know.

    4. TENSILE STRESSES A thin object can be torn apart by centrifugal forces or tidal forces if its tensile strength is not sufficiently strong. [...] 4.1. Rotation

    Works out to around 0.65 dyne/sq.cm. depending on your assumption for the material density

    This is much smaller than typical tensile strengths of normal materials, and even of that of the comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (see Table 1). Thus, even when self-gravity is ignored, âOumuamua can easily withstand its centrifugal force.

    Interesting. Of course, we knew that because it hadn't fallen apart in the last several million years of it's flight.

    The assumption that the relatively small non-Keplerian component to the course of 'Oumuamua is due to light acceleration from the Sun seems unwarranted, when the possibility of it being due to outgassing remains credible, seems ... well, overblown. IMO. Worth discussing as an option, in the same way that reductio ad absurdam remains a valid form of argument.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    1. Re:Capital offence : RTFA by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      To compound my sin of RTFAing, I'll note that there is a revised version of the paper out. As far as I can tell the changes are that they've changed the header to the "ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS" statement, and added a reference at the end. The rest of the contents look essentially the same.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  59. I can name that tune... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 5 tones while standing at the base of Devilâ(TM)s Towet.

  60. Space Cash by dickplaus · · Score: 1

    Wonder how much space cash is on there.

  61. RAMA or Ark ship B by neoRUR · · Score: 1

    It must be either RAMA or the Ark Ship 'B'...

  62. Re:It's a rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (posting as anon as i modded a bit in the topic already)

    Who cares!

  63. Re:It's a rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. Uh, there is a lot of discussion on that suggestion. Whether the seismic (you know, the original data on which the whole proposition is based) actually supports Ryan and Pitman's original interpretation of one catastrophic flooding event remains very much a topic of debate. There are certainly multiple scour channels on the Black Sea side of the Bosphorus, though what the levels of the Bosphorus were for each scouring event is ... very debatable. Let alone their dating, absolute and relative.

    Yeah, it's an interesting question. I spent some days on it while working in the Black Sea a couple of years back. As far as I can tell (and I am tens of thousands of hours of experience short of claiming to be an "expert" in seismic interpretation), the data just isn't sufficient to decide if there was one flood event, or many smaller ones. Feel free to upfront the costs for a seabed corer, boat, crew and permission to block the traffic of one of the most congested sea lanes of the world. The permission would be the hard bit.

    I thought it was common knowledge that the Black Sea formed from the rupture of the ice dam that held Lake Agassiz waters, at the end of the Ice Age.

  64. Someone needs to learn some statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The chances that the first interstellar object that we happened to observe being an artificial object are suitably "astronomical". It would be like purchasing your very first lottery ticket and winning the Powerball. I have little doubt that there are aliens traversing the interstellar medium out there somewhere, but it's probably going to be a little while before we actually observe them.

  65. Gravity assist? by ChatHuant · · Score: 1

    To start with the obvious, IANAA(stronomer).

    However, looking at the object's trajectory I find it interesting that it passes so close to the sun - almost as if it was targeted this way.

    Of course, if it had passed too far from the sun, we wouldn't have seen it at all. Still, I'd expect interstellar objects within say the orbit of Jupiter to be noticed. However, Oumuamua's closest approach to the sun (at 38,100,000 km) hit a circle less than 1/400 of the area of Jupiter's orbit. It does seem a bit weird to me for the first interstellar object ever observed to get so close to the sun by random chance.

    For an interstellar ship, there are however good reasons to pass so close to a star - for example, to use its gravity for an assist, or maybe recharge its batteries.

    1. Re:Gravity assist? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      That's a fair question/ comment.

      If you RTFA'd on 'Oumuamua as it was happening (which I do to a degree by at least reading the abstracts as they go past on the Arxiv mailing list, one email a day, and fully reading interesting papers), you'd have seen that the normal unit of measure for "interstellar objects passing near the Sun" is actually to count "bodies within a sphere containing Neptune". Quite what the logic behind that is, I'm not sure, but it's a volume of about 3.80E+29cu.km. If they looked at bodies within the orbit of Jupiter ... well, that's 1.98E+27 cu.km. They may have chosen that metric as the orbit of the largest body with a significant perturbing cross section. Or chosen it to get manageable integers. I don't know.

      The estimates at that time (number of stars in the galaxy, guess at number of small bodies ejected from the Solar system) were that at any random day there should be about 10000 bodies of a km diameter within that "orbit of Neptune" metric. However, of that number, only a small proportion would be bright enough (in reflected light) to see, and the overwhelming majority of the search effort (for comets, NEAs, PHAs) is confined to the plane of the ecliptic. So ... it wasn't wildly surprising that none had been detected before. Given that search depth (i.e. brightness * exposure) and search plate count are going up all the time, it wasn't terribly surprising that the first discovery came during a time of increasing search effort.

      Everyone in the sane universe is highly suspicious of doing statistics on a sample of one. Which is precisely why my eyebrows went skywards and my mouse crept to the "Submit" button when I read KrÃlikowska & Dybczynski 's paper a couple of days ago. Because, if it's analysis is true, it doubles the size of the catalogue of interstellar objects observed telescopically in the Solar System. If the analysis is correct. Anyway, I submitted it for /., but the editors don't seem interested.

      I'll stress it again - because some of Slashdot's readers don't seem to get the idea - that this sort of paper is not a report of a definite discovery, but reports for consideration and checking. Indeed, the authors stress that point themselves :

      Our main purpose is to show that similar cases should be treated in future with greater care by more reliable preliminary orbit determination and alerting observers about the importance of the object to initiate more follow-up observations.

      Any way, I said my thing on the submissions page. No reason to repeat myself.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    2. Re:Gravity assist? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Oh, sorry, after introducing C/2014 W10 PANSTARRS, I forgot the original point. They (K&D) made a number of attempts to get a coherent solution for the orbit (the details are in the paper, see links already posted), which gave wildly divergent dates of perihelion dates and distances :
      perihelion passage date : 2015 Feb. 9.246 ; 2014 Feb. 06.757 ; 2014 Feb. 07.6 ±979 days ; 2016 Aug. 17.267 ; 2013 Aug. 29.115 ; 2016 Jul. 15.6 ±211 days ; 2013 Jul. 3.8 ±102 days ; 2013 May 16.2 ±42 days
      perihelion distance [AU] :7.4247577 ; 7.9952199 ; 8.00 ±0.75 ; 6.51927 ; 7.7604333 ; 4.40 ±2.26 ; 7.575 ±0.43 ; 7.279 ±0.40

      (Sorry for my presentation ; I've not had a lot of luck with tables in Slashdot previously. RTFP, that's why they PublishedTFP.)

      Which gives two points : they couldn't even be sure if the comet was coming or going at the times of observation (3 years uncertainty in perihelion date, in bold above, extending outside the window of observations); and several of the possible orbital solutions are "robustly hyperbolic". Also, in comment on your original point, most of those perihelion distance solutions are outside the orbit of Jupiter - giving fair grounds to the habit originally noted of doing the statistics for the count of interstellar bodies within the orbit of Neptune.

      And now that they have found this in the archives ... the object is out in the dark depths and no longer available for interrogation, even with our biggest telescopes.

      Exit stage, left, followed by quiet muttering "submitted a damned interesting bit of science geekery, bloody stupid Slashdot didn't even notice ; why effing bother?"

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  66. Re:It's a rock by RockDoctor · · Score: 2

    I thought it was common knowledge etc.

    That is the gist of a proposition published by Ryan and Pitman in 1997. They proposed it on the basis of finding a couple of deeply-incised channels in the sediment and bedrock (their interpretation, not accepted by everyone) near the mouth of the Bosphorous.

    But, with more work (seismic survey boats don't come this way very often, and cruising slowly across an extremely busy shipping lane will get you arrested, your vessel impounded, and probably the vessel master appearing in court after several days in a Turkish prison. Imagine trying the same in New York or Rotterdam harbour mouths.), there are more like half a dozen such channels. Some of them penetrate bedrock, some don't and some you just can't tell (got a boat with a saturation or mixed-gas dive spread on board? And permission to dive?). You also can't tell if they happened one after the other, all at the same time, or every decade and a half over a century - which would put extremely different "human scale" interpretations on the events.

    Producers of hour-long (less advertising time) TV programmes like nice simple narratives. I'm not a TV producer, and I had several days of "waiting on materials" while bobbing around on a boat in the Black Sea, so I read up on the technical literature on the question, as well as viewing the ROV's pre-operations survey of the sea bed around the location (just in case there was anything archaeological 2+ km below us. Within the shallow-seismic (includes laying pipelines) community and the deep seismic (oil exploration) communities, Ryan and Pitman did not present adequate data to convince the majority of people of their case. Which is not a TV-friendly simple story.

    One of "Ryan and Pitman" has stopped writing on the subject - which in science is tantamount to saying "I think I got it wrong that time". The other still raises the subject from time to time.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  67. Every time... by Maritz · · Score: 1

    Each and every time some interesting object up in the sky hits the headlines, you get some fucking retard saying it's aliens. Harvard clearly needs to up their game if they have morons like this on board. This is a fucking rock from deep space. It's not a fucking spaceship, GROW UP.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  68. Re:It's a rock by mcswell · · Score: 1

    "The moon... prevents the Earth's movements from doing anything too radical." Then how do you explain lunacy?