Slashdot Mirror


What Your Phone is Telling Wall Street (wsj.com)

Your phone knows where you shop, where you work and where you sleep. Hedge funds are very interested in such data, so they are buying it. From a report: When Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk said the car maker would work around the clock to boost production of its Model 3 sedan, the number crunchers at Thasos Group decided to watch. They circled Tesla's 370 acres in Fremont, Calif., on an online map, creating a digital corral to isolate smartphone location signals that emanated from within it. Thasos, which leases databases of trillions of geographic coordinates collected by smartphone apps, set its computers to find the pings created at Tesla's factory, then shared the data with its hedge-fund clients [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled; alternative source], showing the overnight shift swelled 30% from June to October.

Last month, many on Wall Street were surprised when Tesla disclosed a rare quarterly profit, the result of Model 3 production that had nearly doubled in three months. Shares shot up 9.1% the next day. Thasos is at the vanguard of companies trying to help traders get ahead of stock moves like that using so-called alternative data. Such suppliers might examine mine slag heaps from outer space, analyze credit-card spending data or sort through construction permits. Thasos's specialty is spewing out of your smartphone.

Thasos gets data from about 1,000 apps, many of which need to know a phone's location to be effective, like those providing weather forecasts, driving directions or the whereabouts of the nearest ATM. Smartphone users, wittingly or not, share their location when they use such apps. Before Thasos gets the data, suppliers scrub it of personally identifiable information, Mr. Skibiski said. It is just time-stamped strings of longitude and latitude. But with more than 100 million phones providing such coordinates, Thasos says it can paint detailed pictures of the ebb and flow of people, and thus their money.


45 of 108 comments (clear)

  1. Re:easy as hell to avoid by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

    Most people wouldn't know how to do that, though.

  2. Disinformation... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There needs to be a OS mod that randomizes location data that apps get within 5 to 10 miles. Only feed the navigation app (if open) the correct data. 5-10 miles should be enough precision for things like weather to work perfectly, while polluting the data streams that app provides sell to third parties.

    1. Re: Disinformation... by tsa · · Score: 1

      They didnâ(TM)t use location data from apps. Phones connect to telecommunication masts, so itâ(TM)s just a matter of counting the number of phones by analyzing how many are connected to the masts in a certain area

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re: Disinformation... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      No, they used location data leaked by apps. Tower location data has much poorer accuracy and also may not be public information.

    3. Re: Disinformation... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      . Tower location data has much poorer accuracy

      That used to be true. Towers are far more precise now than they used to be. Still might be worse than GPS (it depends), but good enough for this purpose.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    4. Re: Disinformation... by Entrope · · Score: 1

      There's no way tower-based locations are as good as GPS, at least when GPS is available. (Inside buildings and under foliage might be a different question.) There just aren't enough towers to triangulate a phone's location using mobile network signals as well as a phone can triangulate its own location using GPS signals -- those are optimized for location performance, whereas mobile network signals are usually optimized for some data throughput measure.

    5. Re: Disinformation... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Because polluting a data pool is more amusing than just not adding your location to it. Active sabotage is always better than passive lack of participation.

    6. Re: Disinformation... by fred911 · · Score: 2

      The issue is GPS is permission based and the phone must be able to "see" the birds, and have network connectivity

      "aren't enough towers to triangulate a phone's location"

        The phone is constantly polling cells providing sending signal strength. Even if there's not sufficient signal to use, the network shares that information in order to make a handoff unnoticed. Triangulation of analogue signal was used extensively in WW2 with very accurate results.

      These days history is in the logs, and it's trivial to know position even more accurately in real time.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    7. Re: Disinformation... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      ) There just aren't enough towers to triangulate a phone's location using mobile network signals

      You don't even need multiple towers. There are many antennas on each tower, each of which has different sensitivities in different arcs. Towers now pass off from directional antenna to directional antenna.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    8. Re: Disinformation... by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 2

      a) Who says they never snoop on Ford?
      b) They snooped on Tesla because there was a specific reason to do so. If Ford was making similar claims about increasing hours, they'd have a reason to snoop on Ford.

    9. Re: Disinformation... by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      This is NOT about fooling some app. This is them having access to the *tower* data, which is always accurate regardless of how you spoof your phone because they're looking at the packets the devices send out to contact towers. You'd need a phone that didn't broadcast in order to avoid this kind of location detection.

    10. Re: Disinformation... by Entrope · · Score: 1

      Cell towers do have multiple sectors, but I find it hard to believe that the channel state information from two of them (because any given phone will not have a line of sight to three sectors) is enough to determine the phone's location. The environment is full of weird reflectors and obstructions that make the signal not just fall off with a power of the distance.

    11. Re:Disinformation... by mikael · · Score: 1

      You get GPS spoofers for mobile phones. They intercept the system call to retrieve the GPS location and provide a user supplied coordinate. I relocated to the Mongolian desert out of boredom and started getting Chinese SMS messages from manufacturing companies looking for new business.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    12. Re:Disinformation... by xpiotr · · Score: 1

      There needs to be a smartphone OS that works for you,
      and does not send your location and your data to whoever is paying for it.
      And strict clear laws for how data collection can be done and used.
      Yes, the data is there, regardless what you do,
      even with a dumb-phone your operator will know which tower you are connected to.

    13. Re: Disinformation... by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      There just aren't enough towers to triangulate a phone's location using mobile network signals as well as a phone can triangulate its own location using GPS signals

      Wait for 5G to be widely deployed, the number of "towers" involved is insane. The planning looks more like a wireless mesh network than a traditional mobile network (lots of small installations on traffic lights/light poles rather than large installations in high spots).

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  3. Thats why by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The smarter nations don't allow their security cleared workers to bring consumer hardware in with them.
    What can't be seen from space can now be tracked per worker per shift from the ground.
    Who works in an office, who works on the mil/gov production line.
    The skilled workers that get the mil production line working after it stops.
    What areas of a mil production line still have the most visits by experts.

    Wonder what a nations top police, city government officials, mil contractors and mil do all day? Map it out and find out :)

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Thats why by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      I think this was an issue recently, where US soldiers were using Strava while deployed abroad -- until someone realized it was possible to calculate deployment numbers by mining Strava data.

    2. Re:Thats why by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      The smarter nations don't allow their security cleared workers to bring consumer hardware in with them.

      Yeah, and just this year it took some random person looking at publicly published fitbit data to point out the error of the US government's ways.
      Remind me again how the proactive smart people banned the data uploads before this became an issue?

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:Thats why by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re 'Remind me again how the proactive smart people"
      That would be the security support offered by the NSA and GCHQ to ensure nothing was detectable from any interesting site?

      The next problem is the factories that make mil equipment.
      Then the police, governments, contractors.

      In the old days every worker was security cleared and the secure building was safe from look down, had no windows.

      Now everyone interesting wonders around with global tracking devices for their shift.
      Better quality walls to block the tracking of workers inside?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Thats why by Deep+Esophagus · · Score: 1

      That's one of many reasons I still use an app-free, text-and-voice-only TracFone. The loss of privacy far outweighs any convenience that a smartphone provides.

  4. Re:easy as hell to avoid by Trogre · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We are not most people.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  5. Re: easy as hell to avoid by reanjr · · Score: 1

    Most people know how to click "No" when the app asks for permissions. Most people just don't care.

  6. Similar stories by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Interesting
    One bond traders made millions by noting Alan Greenspan used a thicker briefcase on the day he announced rate hikes compared to the days he left the interest rate alone.

    The FedEX guy picking up the packages from our company in 1990s said he noted down the number of packages being shipped on the quarter ending evening. He always bought the stock if it showed significant jump over the previous quarter.

    For all that talk about these techniques, the day before Tesla announced its third quarter results, real old fashioned bean counting led a very notable short (named Left, some company called Citron) to reverse course and announce publicly he was no longer shorting Tesla. S3 partners calculated that announcement made 1 billion loss for the shorts.

    So, yes, novel methods are being discovered. But it is rounding error compared to old fashioned standard research.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  7. It back fires as often as it hits pay dirt. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
    Some shorts rented drones and private planes and counted the cars in transit and kept reporting Tesla is not selling the cars, it is being stock piled, and the demand is tanking and the company is probably committing fraud in Enron scale. Turned out to be totally bogus.

    Very funny to read about some photo showing one car with hood open, and these shorts speculating, "they are fixing something in the engine". (The frunk is empty, it is a small storage compartment and you open the hood to put the car in tow mode to load it on a carrier. )

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re: It back fires as often as it hits pay dirt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Where I live a certain large store went out of business. Now that store's equally large parking lot is full of brand new Teslas. Hundreds of them. I have no idea if the stock is stagnant, and/or being replenished.

    2. Re: It back fires as often as it hits pay dirt. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      You do see lots of brand new cars on dealers lots right? Tesla has no dealers. It sells directly. It stores cars wherever it is cheap.

      Pick any car model that sells about 250,000 units a year. Subaru Legacy, Hyundai Sonata ... How many new cars you see in their dealership lots. Is the Tesla lot bigger or smaller?

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    3. Re: It back fires as often as it hits pay dirt. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

      Doesn't Tesla build to order though? Dealerships stock unsold vehicles but you currently need to be on a wait list for a Tesla vehicle, there's currently no way to buy a Tesla off the shelf, so shouldn't Tesla be shipping them as they come off the production line?

    4. Re: It back fires as often as it hits pay dirt. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      All it means is their delivery infrastructure hasn't scaled up properly to meet the new production rates.

    5. Re: It back fires as often as it hits pay dirt. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      This is probably true. Tesla is growing too fast, and they did had assembly line nightmare and production hell. Then when they cleared it, it was delivery nightmares and hell. Soon there will be , perhaps already is, service hell.

      All part of growing up. The production cost per vehicle dropped 30% from Q2 to Q3, due to training and experience of the workers. The started with such poor training and planning. Well, they will eventually sort it all out. Driving a BEV is like having gasoline at 80 cents a gallon. That will trump everything else, as price parity with ICE powertrain is within grasp.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    6. Re: It back fires as often as it hits pay dirt. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      No, Tesla does not build to order. The website lets you configure 'anything', but actual production is different.

      It collects orders, and uses some AI to predict the sales, and builds them in batches. It misfires, it under predicted the demand for AWD, and they had unsold RWD. Looks like it over predicted the performance version and they are clearing the inventory with price reductions and incentives. They have a huge 3750$ tax cut reduction coming on Dec 31. That will help them clear all the inventory. Already fan sites are talking about getting demo cars and inventory cars to get the full tax cut.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  8. "Alternative data" by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    So it's made up, right? Like "alternative facts" are.

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  9. Re:easy as hell to avoid by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We are not most people.

    But we still are too dumb to RTFS.

    They are NOT using location data from apps. They are just counting cell phone transmissions.

    They are just trying to estimate the aggregate number of people in the factory, to see if they are really working late to ship product.

    Similar tactics have been used in the past. For instance, when satellite images first went on-line, hedge funds developed software to count cars in mall parking lots. This put them weeks ahead of other investors that were waiting for the Fed to release data based on retail surveys.

    Another tactic is to photograph cargo ships entering and leaving port. If they sit high in the water, that means many of the containers are going back empty, and the trade deficit is more likely to widen, which means a weaker dollar.

  10. Re: easy as hell to avoid by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    Facebook apps should already be uninstalled or disabled.

  11. Re:easy as hell to avoid by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

    One I remember being famous back in the day was Iomega had released the Zip Drive, and online communities tracked the number of cars in the parking lot on the weekend.

    Certain companies do things to obscure their energy use to try to keep that from leaking information. It gets complicated...

  12. Next quarter by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    Tesla announces even more production, buys thousands of flip phones and randomly turns them on and off inside the factory all day long.

    1. Re:Next quarter by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      That's illegal stock manipulation.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re: Next quarter by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      a) the surveillance is legal.
      b) It could be both trolling surveillance AND illegal stock manipulation.

  13. Re: easy as hell to avoid by astrofurter · · Score: 2

    "But we still are too dumb to RTFS."

    We're not dumb - the fucking story is paywalled. And unfortunately search result quality on Big Brother Google has for some time been downgraded to show only semi-official fake news sources. So a quick search turned up no liberated copy of the article.

    Anyways, the both summary says they are buying databases of surveillance data from smartphone malware/apps. "Thasos gets data from about 1,000 apps, many of which need to know a phone's location to be effective".

    Certainly sounds plausible. Why else would malware companies give away "free" shovelware apps, if they weren't planning to spy on and otherwise abuse their users?

  14. Fuck 'em. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you but as far as I'm concerned, these Thanos guys can eat shit.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  15. Re:easy as hell to avoid by taustin · · Score: 1

    That's not a problem with the app, and changing the app won't make "most people" any less stupid and gullible.

  16. How anononymous is the data? by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
    Why is everyone assuming the claim the data is anonymous is true? The people selling data have a long consistent history of lying their teeth out and they have obvious economic incentives to keep on lying. Why should anyone believe them about anything?

    Big data suppliers consistently ignore their published policies and often break the law and nothing serious happens to them. Just naming Facebook and Twitter proves the point.

    If you take this story at face value you deserve to be hoodwinked and manipulated. We live in the world of 1984 except the surveillance state combines the public and private sectors. Facebook and the NSA are part of a seamless whole.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
  17. Re:Righto. by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Next up: Driving around the area with a carfull of smartphones to skew the data.

    --
    No sig today...
  18. Build To Stock vs Built To Order by sjbe · · Score: 1

    No, Tesla does not build to order.

    Sure they do. They also do some amount of Build To Stock. Doing one does not preclude doing the other, even with the same product going down the same assembly line. My company does some similar things. We mostly BTO but when we have good reason to suspect a customer will order more of a specific product we often will BTS some extras units so we can save money on setup costs and buy materials in bulk. We are taking a calculated risk by doing so but it usually works out in our favor. Tesla if they are smart is doing the same thing. If they have a model configuration that is popular they can save some money by building a few extras of that model when they are going down the line.

    1. Re:Build To Stock vs Built To Order by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Yes, I stand corrected.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  19. Parallel Construction by Avidiax · · Score: 1

    Could this just be clever "parallel construction" to cover insider trading? Buy some satellite data or phone location data and use it to prove what you already know.