Slashdot Mirror


Switzerland Remains 'Extremely Attractive' For Pirate Sites, MPAA Says (torrentfreak.com)

While the European Union has worked hard to strengthen its copyright laws in recent years, one country in the heart of the continent chooses its own path. Switzerland is not part of the EU, which means that its policies deviate quite a bit from its neighbors. According to Hollywood, that's not helping creators. From a report: Responding to recent submission to the United States Trade Representative (USTR), the MPAA has identified several foreign "trade barriers" around the world. In Hollywood's case, many of these are related to piracy. One of the countries that's highlighted, in rather harsh terms, is Switzerland. According to the MPAA, the country's copyright law is "wholly inadequate" which, among other things, makes it "extremely attractive" to host illegal sites. "Switzerland's copyright law is wholly inadequate, lacking crucial mechanisms needed for enforcement in the digital era," MPAA writes. [...] The European country has plans to update its laws, but the proposed changes are not significant improvements, Hollywood's trade group notes.

135 comments

  1. So in other words... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Funny

    The allegation is that Swiss copyright laws are like their cheese?

    1. Re: So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Americans hate the MPAA just as much as others. But how are their laws lacking

    2. Re:So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That they balance out a otherwise tasteless situation?

    3. Re: So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Americans are cool, their government, not so much.

    4. Re: So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      MPAA wants others to do their job is all. ISP dont need to assist MPAA, go after the domains, servers, etc.,

    5. Re:So in other words... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The allegation is that Switzerland hasn't bent over and lubed up for the MAFIAA like other countries have.

    6. Re:So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, not at all.
      The methods Hollywood uses to guarantee there are no profits are the same methods used by Switzerland to guarantee there are no copyrights.

    7. Re: So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Quite the paradox, ain't it? I mean, since the government is (re)elected by those "cool" Americans, that seems like a strange thing to say. If they were really "cool", I doubt they would have been so passive about this disaster in the last election.

    8. Re: So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Problem with USA happens to be the lobbiest controlling those that are elected. Its corruption at its finist, but made to be legal, just like the NCAA with their unpaid atheltic employees.

    9. Re: So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is marked troll, but it is rather accurate.

    10. Re: So in other words... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      well when the choices are hillary and trump, what other outcome did you really expect?

    11. Re: So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those choices were made by the voters...They only have themselves to blame for keeping the GOP/DNC in power.

    12. Re: So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The outcome: everyone kneeling to APK!

      His hosts file engine will dominate all of American society. All of American politics.

      Democrats? Republicans? Forget them. BOW to APK! Now!

      ALL HAIL APK!

    13. Re:So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, we adhere to copyright law. We just do not want to criminalize the entire population of our country for minor stuff and the legal system / prisons are non-profit.

    14. Re: So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The allegation is more about how the global government is based in Hollywood and all other nations should submit to it.

      Liberals have always been fond of big government and Hollywood is full of Liberals. Does this surprise you?

    15. Re: So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the headline:

      California Remains 'Extremely Attractive' For Rent-Seeking Sites, Switzerland Says

    16. Re:So in other words... by vlad30 · · Score: 1

      No, not at all. The methods Hollywood uses to guarantee there are no profits .

      If they want fair protection they should pay their fair share in taxes

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    17. Re: So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah! Even if the choice was Hillary vs Putin, Hillary *still* would have lost. Now that I say that, I'm starting to wondering if we did elect Putin.

    18. Re: So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, no. The Democrat voters chose Bernie Sanders. The DNC put Hillary up as their choice. When they were sued by the voters, the DNC went so far as to tell the courts that they were under *NO* obligation to field the candidate that the voters chose.

      Which is, yet more proof, of what I have been saying as a Constitutional Libertarian. It is way past time to abolish political parties, outlaw them, and force each candidate to run on their own merits as opposed to the "merits" of a party.

    19. Re: So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know the count was fraudulent, and the DNC is correct, it is a corrupt, money laundering organization (GOP also), they represent the big donors, but the voters aren't fighting back. They gave consent. They could have written in Sanders, but they voted for Hillary (just not enough to win the general). So screw them...

      And no, you can't abolish the party. People have a right to organize and vote as they wish as long as they remain peaceful. Don't blame the party for the power the voters give to it.

      Every chronic failure in our government can be traced back to the voters. They are responsible for the people they (re)elect. Nobody else can be.

    20. Re: So in other words... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I'm starting to wondering if we did elect Putin.

      No, you elected the CIA.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  2. Good job by TimMD909 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Switzerland, if MPAA is your worst enemy, I'd have to say you're doing it right. Godspeed.

    1. Re:Good job by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Switzerland seems to be one of those rare oddball countries where the government actually works for the benefit of its citizens. Not the benefit of some other countries' citizens, or for the benefit of whoever gave out the most bribes to the politicians.

      Utterly shocking if you're from place with a corrupt government like the United States or the EU.

      Now before you liberals all go into rapture, note that the Swiss government will kick out illegal immigrants because they have determined (correctly) that having too many illegal immigrants does not benefit Swiss citizens.

    2. Re:Good job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      >Before you liberal snowflakes get excited about this, I'm going to be a snowflake first, showing how you're actually the snowflakes here!

      grow up

    3. Re:Good job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score: 6, Insightful

    4. Re:Good job by lorinc · · Score: 2

      Yeah sure, Monaco and Lichtenstein are fine too.

    5. Re:Good job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      note that the Swiss government will kick out illegal immigrants because they have determined (correctly) that having too many illegal immigrants does not benefit Swiss citizens.

      It also helps that Switzerland is located centrally in Europe and almost entirely surrounded by high mountains and lakes which makes illegal entry significantly more difficult than at say the US/Mexico border. They don't call it the fortress of Europe for nothing you know.

    6. Re:Good job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly? No!
      There are more lobbyists in Bern then Politicians, the same as everywhere.
      The only reason nobody has bend yet is, nobody makes any (big) money from Hollywood.

      Why you think Switzerland is any better than the other countries? Because we are Swiss or what?

      And we do not kick out illegal immigrants because they do not benefit the country. They do. We kick them out because we have a political party which does politics like trump since 20 years or so (We say we kick them out, but actually do you know how many of them disappear before getting kicked out? It is not working at all, and nobody is interested in making it work). Even a top politician from the SVP was fined because he had a illegal immigrant as maid. Not even the loudest voices against migration are against it, as long as they can make profit from it. They only are loud and stupid so that loud and stupid people like you will vote for them. They make migration worse and worse. Else they would lose their only political position.

      Switzerland benefits from the migrations more than any other country in Europe. Just because you vote for the most conservative party does not make migration bad.

    7. Re:Good job by Sique · · Score: 2
      As someone who crosses the austrian/swiss and german/swiss border quite regularly, I tell you it's easy. I didn't have any passport or ID card with me and crossed the border four times in a single day without being controlled. There are checkpoints at the roads, yes. But you can cross the border easily by just walking 100 m away from the checkpoints.

      Germany is officially enforcing border controls between Austria and Germany right now, but it's mainly checkpoints at the Autobahn. Especially around Salzburg, there are no border controls except at the Autobahn A1/A8 at Walserberg, which means that you can avoid the 10 min delay by leaving the Autobahn in Austria at Exit Wals, driving along the Bundesstraße 1/Bundesstraße 21 into Germany to Piding and then entering the Autobahn again at Exit Bad Reichenhall.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    8. Re:Good job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Switzerland benefits from the migrations more than any other country in Europe.

      LOL...are you serious? Watch Switzerland implode within 20 years from their failed policies. The only thing going for them is the fact of being surrounded by EU countries, which makes it somewhat easier to return immigrants to their respective first-entry countries. Suggest you go take a look in refugee centers. Or social services. They'll tell you all about the benefits of immigrants! Like Eritreans, where 90% do not work even after 7 years! Because why should they, if the Swiss are stupid enough to pay everything for them and their 5 kids?

      And as far as legal immigrants go, which allows EU-folks to come and work. What's gonna happen, when they go back? Where will they spend their money? Not in Switzerland, for sure. Hell, most of them even bring their food with them crossing the border, so they don't have to pay the ridiculous Swiss prices! Wait for them to reach retirement and your AHV and pension funds will be paying billions per year to foreign countries! Switzerland should brace for the biggest recession ever! They won't, however, be the only country facing such and it goes well beyond just immigration. Just that housing and feeding non-productive people by the thousands surely isn't helping, least of all, in this case, the Swiss themselves.

    9. Re:Good job by Bert64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly, copyright law was intended to benefit society as a whole by encouraging creation of works with the notion that after a while these works would fall into the public domain for the benefit of all.
      Copyright now has become so corrupted that the benefit to the people is lost, by the time anything reaches the public domain all those who were around when it was created will be dead. It's not surprising that people are not keen to support such a system.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    10. Re:Good job by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Utterly shocking if you're from place with a corrupt government like the United States or the EU.

      Oh the EU? Which of the 28 countries specifically are you talking about? There are many fine examples within the EU of governments that work happily for citizens rather than the other way around. Yet calling them all "EU" just dilutes your claim.

      note that the Swiss government will kick out illegal immigrants

      You'll find that most countries kick out illegal immigrants including the US and pretty much every country in the EU. Though given your assertion that this seems to be somehow unique you may have simply exposed your own racism on the issue.

    11. Re:Good job by rapidmax · · Score: 1

      Exactly, copyright law was intended to benefit society as a whole by encouraging creation of works with the notion that after a while these works would fall into the public domain for the benefit of all.

      Exactly this is it. As a Swiss citizen I'll vote against any further extensions of author's rights.

    12. Re:Good job by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Surrounded by mountains yes, but those mountains are covered in roads and railway lines which are easily travelled. Plus there is very little in the way of actual border checkpoints, you can usually just drive across unchallenged. Switzerland is part of the shengen zone, where borders controls are only really enforced at the periphery of the zone.

      When it comes to difficult borders in europe, you'd have to hand it to the UK which is surrounded by water and is not part of shengen. If you've already managed to enter the shengen zone then crossing to switzerland is trivial, yet entering the UK is not... Despite this, many people still try to illegally cross the border into the UK and will employ various measures to avoid detection, often hiding in the back of goods vehicles.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    13. Re:Good job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try contributing something to the world, then see how you like them

    14. Re:Good job by samkass · · Score: 1

      From neighboring countries, it's trivial to drive into Switzerland, hike into Switzerland, take the train into Switzerland, fly, etc. I've lived here two years and never had my papers checked at the border when traveling within Europe, whether by foot, car, train, or plane. (Yes, you read that right, they generally don't check ID at airports.) The problem is, once you're here, you need to register to do virtually anything, from buying a cell phone to getting medical care to getting an apartment or job. Everyone here is registered in the canton or gemeinde ("commune" on a town level) where they live, and you need that card for almost anything official.

      Also, legal immigrants comprise over 25% of the country's population, so it's not like immigration is uncommon. It's getting a little harder to get a visa these days if you're not an EU person, but if you are, it's still in the "shengen" system so it's easy. And if you're an asylum seeker, you get distributed to the cantons and gemeindes who are responsible for housing you while your case is processed. But to progress visas from an L to a B to a C to a citizen requires increasing levels of integration, establishing local ties, and demonstrating Swiss knowledge and culture. So even with the large number of foreign-born people, everything still feels "Swiss," at least to an auslander like me.

      Now, I'm not sure what any of this has to do with Copyright, so please go ahead and rightly mark this "Off-Topic" (but maybe also Informative?), but I thought you might be interested in the point of view of an expat living in Switzerland.

      (As to Copyright, everyone I know generally follows the rule of thumb that you generally want to buy stuff if it's available for sale to support the creators, but if they region lock it or otherwise restrict it or delay it, downloading Copyrighted stuff is not illegal here as long as you don't distribute it yourself. To wit, even though downloading Copyrighted stuff is not a crime here, Netflix is still reasonably popular.)

      --
      E pluribus unum
    15. Re: Good job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's always the fault of the left and never my fault - rightard.

  3. Clearly we must invade by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Funny

    >> one country in the heart of the continent chooses its own path. Switzerland is not part of the EU, which means that its policies deviate quite a bit from its neighbors. According to Hollywood, that's not helping creators.

    Clearly we must invade. If only we could find someone with skill in mass media to develop a propaganda campaign.

    1. Re:Clearly we must invade by youngone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      According to Hollywood, that's not helping creators.

      Since when were copyright laws about helping creators?

    2. Re:Clearly we must invade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look here mister! We need 90% of what the actual creators make so we can find more creators and give out bonuses. Yes, I know... That sounds like a lot, but considering where the creator is coming from 10% is a lot to them when they sell $100M in CDs.

    3. Re: Clearly we must invade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might as well insert the classic Ricky Roma speech to Williamson here: sorry search for 'Where did you learn your trade?

    4. Re:Clearly we must invade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Originally they were. And they stayed that way up until approximately the 1980s, and the arrival of the internet.

      About then, publishers figured out that they could play creators off against consumers and make out like bandits on the friction between them, and they've been doing it ever since.

      But until then, publishers were seen - correctly - as the natural enemy of creators, and the whole of copyright law was about controlling them. That's right, it was aimed against publishers. The turnaround since then is a huge tribute to the power of well coordinated lobbying.

    5. Re:Clearly we must invade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Originally they were. And they stayed that way up until approximately the 1980s, and the arrival of the internet.

      Actually, no. As various people correctly pointed out on e.g. torrentfreak, copyright originally was created for the benefit of the greater public. That creators benefited was just a means to an end.

      These days it's still just a means to an end, but the big publisher cartels have won instead. And to them, indeed, it's all about control, control, control. Control of the means, control of the creators, and control of the public. If there was ever a goose with golden eggs enshrined in law, it's what the publishers and other middlemen made out of copyright law.

      This really didn't start with "the internet" either. Go look at their reaction to the pianola, for one.

    6. Re:Clearly we must invade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Invasion would mean too many casualties.

      Maybe the President can decree a trade embargo on the grounds of national security. Something along the lines of "If they won't obey our laws we won't buy their watches". Then he can claim to be protecting the vital american watchmaking industry.

    7. Re:Clearly we must invade by Meneth · · Score: 1

      American copyright law, perhaps, but the first iteration in Britain was all about censorship. By giving the "right to copy" to only crown-licensed publishers, the government attempted to prevent the spread of criticizing ideas.

  4. Gibraltar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I guarantee Gibraltar is orders of magnitude more liberal with copyright. It’s a total free for all on everything and the government is happy to just play a long. The northern part of Cyprus too is a lawless area with a lot of pirate TV stuff.

    1. Re:Gibraltar by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 0

      Just wait, the MAFIAA will get them once they've got Switzerland into line.

    2. Re:Gibraltar by Narcocide · · Score: 0

      So which hosting company there do you work for?

    3. Re:Gibraltar by Gavagai80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a huge difference between a lawless place, and a place with laws that are liberal with copyright. Switzerland is not the slightest bit lawless.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    4. Re:Gibraltar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on ones perspective, komrade....

      Political slant joking aside, this is a valid point.

      Authoritarians would view Switzerland as lawless.
      I, you of course, would view it as liberal and likely 'just' given the topic at hand.

  5. It's legal to download by rgbe · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's Switzerland (at least when I was last there) it's legal to download copyrighted material as long as you're not uploading it and you're using it for private purposes.

    1. Re:It's legal to download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Which is interesting, given that so many International standards are hosted by organizations based in Switzerland, and demand you pay for each copy of the standard you need...

    2. Re:It's legal to download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. Piracy in Switzerland is illegal. Piracy is when you upload or distribute copyrighted material.
      Copying or downloading for private use without distributing or showing to others is not piracy and absolutely legal.

    3. Re:It's legal to download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We used to be neutral and therefore politically stable. As Swiss, I become more and more interested in alternatives.

    4. Re:It's legal to download by MrMr · · Score: 1

      That used to be the norm in the EU as well. Fortunately the EU-directives since the early nineties have fixed that. Currently there are no relevant rights of use left.

    5. Re:It's legal to download by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Currently there are no relevant rights of use left.

      Yet here in the Netherlands and several other EU countries we are still paying for them. That's right, there's a tax on every blank CD, MP3 player, cell phone and hard disk sold, to compensate the music and film industry for what has been dubbed "home copying" of copyrighted material.

      The tax was introduced to compensate the industry for downloading of copyrighted material, which was legal or at least condoned at the time. When downloading was made illegal, the tax was lowered a little but remained in place. Ostensibly to compensate the music industry for time or format shifting of legally owned media (hence the name "home copy")... but that has always been a right, and the industry has never had the right to collect a tax for that: making a copy of media you already own does not constitute a lost sale (as several judges have confirmed).

      Interestingly, it was the EU Court who ruled that the "home copy" levy - as compensation for illegal downloads - was in itself illegal. And since the government was no longer allowed to compensate the industry, downloading of copyrighted material promptly was made illegal by law and the levy was to be repealed. In the past, every proposal to make downloading illegal was accompanied by one to repeal the levy at the same time, yet due to a lobbying effort that reached bizarre levels on intensity, the levy remained. You'd think if the industry was being compensated for home copies, there should also be a law that guarantees my right to make such a copy, but you'd be wrong. And thanks to DRM I sometimes cannot even use original media that I own legally (thanks, HDCP)

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    6. Re:It's legal to download by bsolar · · Score: 1

      Note that the “private purpose” protection in Switzerland does not apply to software though.

  6. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Switzerland hasn't implemented the draconian copyright laws that we suckered the US and Canada into by painting them as the biggest sources of piracy, so we're going to paint Swiss people with the same brush.

    1. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They talk about this a lot. The Swiss probably favor a piecemeal approach. Surprised Hollywood is complaining and not the software industry.

    2. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Canada?

      Canada has very liberal piracy laws. You can do anything so long as it's not making profit.

    3. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no mention of money laundering either

    4. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just not aware of all the bullshit laws that organisations like OpenMedia keep trying to block every year.

    5. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada?

      Canada has very liberal piracy laws. You can do anything so long as it's not making profit.

      Apparently you missed the renegotiated NAFTA agreement that Trump was forcing on us, and Justin Trudeau just rolled over and signed us up for.

  7. Hollywood is not a creator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every single film is just a mix/reboot of other films and maybe the lead character switched to a black or a woman (or both). Pure trash.

    1. Re:Hollywood is not a creator by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Ghostbusters.

  8. awwww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    awww how cute, the mpaa said something.

  9. One word: Waaaaa. by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even as a copyright holder myself, I recognize that copyright law in the United States is completely and utterly broken. Only in the United States could it make sense to have:

    • Standards bodies that create policies like "You can't show this content unless your equipment supports [insert random copy protection standard here]".
    • Copy protection that gets repeatedly rendered useless within months after it hits store shelves.
    • Buggy implementations that break when you connect certain pieces of equipment together (e.g. Mac Mini w/ Denon or Yamaha receivers).
    • Laws that make it illegal to crack those copy protection standards to make your equipment actually work the way it is supposed to work.
    • Consumers still willingly paying several dollars extra on every single device for the privilege of their equipment not working right and being rendered worthless two years later when the standards body decides that they have to come up with yet another copy protection standard.

    And if those media execs still think that HDCP is a good idea even after crazy mounds of evidence to the contrary, there's no way they'll *ever* be smart enough to realize just how stupid it is to waste time chasing after pirate sites. Stopping profit loss from piracy by going after pirate sites is the technological equivalent of trying to end world hunger by hiring fifty people to fly around the world, and, upon seeing a locust, land the plane, put on boots, and stomp it to death. You will never win that way. You will only look silly.

    If the huge drop in piracy after the rise of the iTunes Music Store taught us anything, it is that piracy is not caused predominantly by people being unwilling to spend money, but rather predominantly by content owners refusing to take it, and doing everything in their power to maintain tight control in ways that consumers can't deal with. If you create content that people want and make it available in a form that people are willing to pay for, they will do so. If you don't, they'll pirate it. And no new laws will ever change that, no matter how draconian. At best, you'll just force it further underground, where you can't track it or earn ad revenue from it.

    The cause of piracy problems isn't Switzerland, but rather the content distributors' unwillingness to work together to improve access to content, coupled with their irrational fear of allowing any single outlet to gain enough power to drive prices down to levels that consumers find reasonable. They need to quit looking for countries to blame and start looking in the mirror.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    1. Re: One word: Waaaaa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At least you live in a country where they probably wont sever your right hand for stealing copyrights

    2. Re:One word: Waaaaa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need to quit looking for countries to blame and start looking in the mirror.

      Yeah well, so do the voters that always reelect their puppets into office. Nothing is going to change until they do.

    3. Re:One word: Waaaaa. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      Exactly. These idiots don't understand the 3 types of consumers:

      1. Buy it,
      2. Pirate it,
      3. Ignore it.

      If content isn't legally available I just ignore it. Yeah, as kids we used to pirate the fuck out of everything. As adults we support the content producers like so they can continue to produce more.

      While I don't agree with it, I can understand why some pirate. Of course these aren't mutually l exclusive and there ARE exceptions. If you bought it AND you pirate then is it really piracy??? No.

      This just proves that piracy is a **business opportunity and free marketing.**

      But god forbid these idiots don't provide a legal way to buy old movies, TV shows, music, games, etc. legally and then they wonder why people pirate.

      Make ALL the content available for purchases dumbasses and we'll buy more if it.

      It's kind of fuckin hard to buy it when it isn't legally available for sale! Go figure!!

    4. Re:One word: Waaaaa. by tepples · · Score: 2

      If content isn't legally available I just ignore it.

      If you ignore it, then years later you create something that's too similar, you run the risk of it still being considered accidental infringement.

    5. Re:One word: Waaaaa. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      Interesting.

      Would you referring to example of where Fogerty was sued for copying his own sound?

      * https://mentalfloss.com/articl...

    6. Re: One word: Waaaaa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Power corrupts. How can we see to it that the people we elect don't have power?

    7. Re: One word: Waaaaa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20 year old movies should be PUBLIC DOMAIN. Libraries should seed their torrents.

    8. Re:One word: Waaaaa. by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I have no problems paying for content when the content I want is available at a reasonable price, will play on the playback devices I have and doesn't require me to go out of my way to acquire it.

      I regularly go to the cinema to see movies and I am more than willing to pay for that (saw Bohemian Rhapsody the other day in fact and planning to see the new Fantastic Beasts when it opens on Thursday and even went out of my way to go see The Lion King as part of a Disney Classics thing even though I already own it on DVD). And I will buy DVDs for my DVD collection (added Ready Player One to the collection recently along with the Oscar-winning Japanese film Spirited Away but I have an extensive collection). And I watch a lot of content (old and new) on free-to-air TV.

      But when content is unavailable to buy from the retailers I have access to (e.g. the cult classic cyberpunk film Johnny Mnemonic which I still can't find on DVD except as a second hand import item that may not work on my DVD player due to region locks), isn't being shown at cinemas I have easy access to (as was the case with a recent theatrical screening of 2001 A Space Odyssey that was only playing in theaters I couldn't get to) or isn't being aired on local TV (e.g. the local TV network that has exclusive rights to Madam Secretary is many episodes behind the US airings) the incentive to pirate that content goes up dramatically.

      And no, none of the content I want is available via the streaming services that I could purchase.

    9. Re:One word: Waaaaa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even as a copyright holder myself, I recognize that copyright law in the United States is completely and utterly broken

      Software is covered by copyright.

      You'll have a hard time finding anyone on Slashdot who isn't a copyright holder.

    10. Re:One word: Waaaaa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, no. Software SOURCE CODE is subject to copyright. The output of the compiler is not.

    11. Re:One word: Waaaaa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a case of "you can't have a cake and eat it too".

      If you can sell the copyright to something you made, then you can indeed infringe on it too. You cannot both earn money on selling copyright, and then earn more money selling the same copyrighted works (because you sold those rights).

      So either you have a law system where Fogerty can be sued for pirating Fogerty-sound (after selling the rights), or you can have a law system where you can't sell/transfer copyright. I.e. copyright stay with the composer/band/writer/artist no matter what.

    12. Re:One word: Waaaaa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? So I can copy all those compiled games , as long as I stay clear of the source code?

      Fine. I was only going to play those game, didn't plan on rolling my own mods. Seems I won't have to pay anything?

    13. Re:One word: Waaaaa. by tepples · · Score: 1

      That and Bright Tunes Music v. Harrisongs Music, the "My Sweet Lord" case.

    14. Re:One word: Waaaaa. by AsylumWraith · · Score: 1

      And no, none of the content I want is available via the streaming services that I could purchase.

      You're not looking hard enough then. I found all three available for rent/purchase on Vudu in under 3 minutes:

      https://www.vudu.com/content/m...
      https://www.vudu.com/content/m...
      https://www.vudu.com/content/m...

      Not sure why you'd want to watch Johnny Mnemonic though; the short story is so much better, and can be finished in under 20 minutes.

    15. Re:One word: Waaaaa. by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Except that Vudu is unavailable here in Australia.

    16. Re: One word: Waaaaa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Pirate Bay is.

    17. Re: One word: Waaaaa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First step? Don't reelect them! What is the matter with you people?!

  10. They would say this even if its not. by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    Its in their best interest.

    --
    [($)]
  11. Sovereign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A sovereign nation with borders doing what it wants.

    Outstanding.

  12. Screw the MPAA by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    And not in a good way.

  13. one good thing from trump by bloodhawk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The one good thing to come from Trump. His harpooning of the various trade agreements which the MPAA had corrupted to their benefit are being systematically dismantled around the world, even the TPP which he pulled out of is now a much better agreement as with the US gone so too went all the insane copyright shit they were trying to force the rest of the world to swallow.

    1. Re:one good thing from trump by dryeo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unluckily he just put the copyright shit in NAFTA2, and he is planning lots more of the same as he isolates countries and pushes new trade deals.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    2. Re:one good thing from trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Trump set a precedent: To unilaterly tear up contracts/trade deals. And other gutless countries and political leaders have no so far demanded compensation with aggrivated damages. So others can too.

      However the Millenials are taking over, and not easilly bought off meanwhile Europe is going to get even for repatriated tax free profits. MPAA indirect cutout directors are in the Panama and Pacific papers. The IRS may actually look kind compared to the EU.

    3. Re:one good thing from trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am actually truly amazed that any country would permit such conditions in the agreements anymore. Especially with Trump being such an arsehole, They allowed them to give some give and take but since trump wants every agreement to purely favour the US why the fuck would anyone permit this garbage being added in.

    4. Re:one good thing from trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is a good thing, however you will find he thinks that was an unfortunate side effect hence why all the new agreements he is still trying to ram those provisions up the worlds rectums.

    5. Re:one good thing from trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USA is allowed to tear up agreements. Everyone else is supposed to abide by them. That's not really new, but definitely highlighted by Trump.

  14. If you don't want to subject yourself to foreign c by reanjr · · Score: 1

    ...stop exporting your copyrighted works if you're gonna bitch about foreign laws.

  15. I can't be arsed to pirate things anymore by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I can stream for a decent price, and I have so much content that if somebody doesn't want me seeing their stuff I'll just move onto something else.

    I do kinda miss eMusic. When it was cheap I could pull 7 albums for $20/mo. I probably only liked 1 enough to listen to more than once, but I didn't mind paying $140/yr for 12 good albums. But I needed to be able to pull 84 and sift though them. Some of my favorite stuff I didn't like much at first and then it grew on my. Ensiferum was like that. In Flames too.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  16. Re:Good job... Real democracy by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Switzerland seems to be one of those rare oddball countries where the government actually works for the benefit of its citizens. Not the benefit of some other countries' citizens, or for the benefit of whoever gave out the most bribes to the politicians.

    Utterly shocking if you're from place with a corrupt government like the United States or the EU.

    That is because Switzerland is a "direct democracy". You see, the people actually vote on things. All it takes is 50,000 citizens (or 8 of the elected politicians) to call for any recently enacted or changed laws to require a direct vote by the citizens (a simple majority yes/no vote). It makes it kind of hard for special interest groups with big pockets to get to all but 50,000 people in the country to prevent a direct vote.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  17. Torrents? Re:It's legal to download by Camembert · · Score: 1

    The legal subtlety may be that when torrenting, you don’t only download, you also upload.
    How is this handled in Switzerland?

    1. Re: Torrents? Re:It's legal to download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just set the torrent to download only.

    2. Re:Torrents? Re:It's legal to download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swiss here: It's not. the courts here just don't give a hoot about digital copyright laws.

  18. I don't stream, I don't buy MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't "pirate" either. All that crap isn't really worth the effort. BUT... if there were anything I'd long for, I think I would opt for "pirating". I detest those *AAs which just bribe and lobby their business around what's left of our democratic institutions and definitely don't want to throw any money their way.

  19. Simple fix for MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just release all content at the same time worldwide at the same reasonable price for the same conditions.

    Piracy solved.

    The ONLY reason people go the troubled length to download from piracy is that they don't have legal access to the content they know is available elsewhere. MPAA is effectivly the biggest single enabler of piracy.

  20. ShareReactor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently people don't remember ShareReactor, a swiss ed2k site and one of the first that was taken down.

  21. Yes and in fact Switserland is the last ... by MxMatrix · · Score: 0

    ... true democracy left in the whole of europe and perhaps the world. The Swiss have more direct power over their government than any other country. Not only their watches and railway system are superior but also their hart felt urge for honest politics.

    --
    Bach says it all.
  22. MPAA throws hissy about about lobbying expense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They spend a lot of money influencing law across the world and the EU is doing its best to be told how to behave... but then there's Switzerland. Switzerland don't seem to care much about this... possibly because it's not a problem that affects them very much, a typically Swiss attitude. So the MPAA are writing sternly worded letters in the hopes that the people they've already bought will save them from having to buy more people in Switzerland.

    I wonder how many Swiss bank accounts are operated by the MPAA. There doesn't seem to be much outrage about that sort of thing.

  23. As a swiss citizen i have to say.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. go fuck yourself Hollywood!

  24. The EU hates Switzerland too by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

    While Hollywood wants the whole world to obey whatever IP regime benefits the studios most, the EU wants all other countries to "harmonize" with the Union's high tax rates. Switzerland manages industrial prosperity on much lower tax rates, and governs mostly at the cantonal (county) level, which reduces centralized bureaucracy. Brussels has never liked having a safe, stable-for-centuries adjacent country that Europeans can just take a train to and make a suitcase of money disappear.

    Switzerland prides itself on an engrained neutrality that allows it to trade freely with every part of the world while avoiding the entangling alliances that have caused so many European wars. This also means staying out of international trade agreements that it feels threaten its freedom. That's why it could be the first organizer of international copyright a century ago with the Berne Convention, while at the same time staying out of the Hollywood cartel.

    1. Re:The EU hates Switzerland too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I have some special insight on the EU's tax complaints, being in Luxembourg.

      The EU does not complain about our personal tax rates, which are some of the lowest in the world. They _do_ complain when countries cut special deals to get corporate headquarters to move around... eg, they do not like races to the bottom. We've gotten hit for this in the past, but we've stopped doing that and we can still manage low tax rates without a peep from the EU.

      So please don't spread your Brexiteer FUD here, we're not buying it.

    2. Re:The EU hates Switzerland too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is wrong to compare a Swiss canton with a "county": it's more like a "state" (if you want to use US-centric analogies). The equivalent of a "county" in Switzerland is called a "municipality".

  25. ORLY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah. When it is on MPAA interest then "countries have trade barriers". Fuck these vampires. Thanks Switzerland and a TON of others who won't submiss themselves to MPAA just because US thinks it rules in other countries. Morons.

  26. Re:Good job... Real democracy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On the other hand in 2009 they voted to include alternative medicine (i.e. pseudo-scientific snake oil) in the constitution. Maybe someone from Switzerland can say how much effect it has had; AIUI it was effectively nullified by the fact that politicians didn't change the rules on funding treatments to remove the "proven effective" requirement.

    Direct democracy can be great, but can also result in nonsense, so it's important to have strong checks and balances. Problem is that people get very upset if they vote for something a a check or balance frustrates it, e.g. Brexit.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  27. Not on the payroll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh darn, I guess Switzerland isn't on the payroll of the MPAA. Oh, and they are acting independently.

  28. MPAA has the ability to retalitate by houghi · · Score: 2

    All they need to do is ask all their members to close their Swiss bank accounts they use for their Hollywood Accounting. That will show that they are actually seriosus about it.

    Why would they do business with a country that does not respect them?

    Another thing they can do out of protest is ask their members to go on the streets and smash their swiss watches. (I'm helping them, right?)

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:MPAA has the ability to retalitate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wouldn't make a scratch on the Swiss banking and financial sector.

  29. Lobbiest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because the US and a Us lobbieing organization lobbied to make an activity illegal doesn't mean the rest of the world have to live within a desired law of a US organization.

  30. Re:Good job... Real democracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Direct democracy can be great, but can also result in nonsense, so it's important to have strong checks and balances.

    Well, if a vote with a "stupid" alternative comes up - there is indeed the chance that the majority goes for "stupid". There is always the option of forcing another vote undoing the first though - once sufficiently many sees the light.

  31. Re:Good job... Real democracy by bsolar · · Score: 2

    The 5 forms of alternative medicine voted in 2009 were included in the basic healthcare coverage for a trial period, pending evaluation of their effectiveness. I think homeopathy got included in the basic coverage due to the “placebo effect” actually having some value, with the majority of medics prescribing it knowing it’s basically fresh water but still obtaining good results. About the others I have no idea.

    Furthermore, that inclusion concerns the basic coverage mandated by law: most people actually interested in alternative medicine treatments are likely to supplement the basic coverage with complementary insurance options anyway.

  32. Re:Good job... Real democracy by bsolar · · Score: 1

    It’s actually a good thing IMHO: it trains voters to actually try to understand the consequences of their vote or pay the price for their own shortsightedness. It also in part removes from the equation the usual excuse “politicians did that!”.

  33. the Motion Picture Association of America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And corrupt copyright laws are extremely attracrive to the MPAA who mysteriously function as a legal apparatus globally

  34. Poor things... by WillyWanker · · Score: 1

    Multi-billion dollar industry whines it's not making enough. Film at 11.

  35. Re:Good job... Real democracy by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    It also makes it easy for extremists to get their point across as the complete set of legislation that affects people is so large and complex that no reasonable person can understand all the issues. This is the primary reasons representative democracies exist.

    Direct democracies like all systems have benefits and downsides.

  36. The MPAA has never helped "creators" by gweihir · · Score: 1

    The only thing they care about is distributors. Well, guess what, the Swiss government asked some actual scientists for an analysis whether "piracy" harms creators and it found a small positive effect instead. As a result, downloading for private use is legally tolerated.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  37. Gibraltar isn't a country by andersh · · Score: 2

    Yes, but Gibraltar is not a country. It's just a British enclave in Spain. It has it's own gov't and laws, but it's still not a country.

  38. Re:Good job... Real democracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, voting is mandatory. Important element.

  39. As a Swiss national... by diethelm · · Score: 1

    ... I have waited a long time to post something like this.

    Up yours, US of A.

  40. Re: Called it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A deeply conservated place with free education and healthcare? You don't say? Oh and employees get access to a free gym.

  41. Re:Good job... Real democracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All it takes is 50,000 citizens

    Correct

    (or 8 of the elected politicians)

    Wrong.

  42. Don't forget these same people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being willing to pirate other's work, or infringe on other's copyrights by placing a cease and desist against the original work their own artists sublicensed to produce their works.

    Bjorne I believe is his name has a whole writeup on this on youtube in relation to licensed work of his that was used by someone under BMG's label and BMG then C&Ding his *ORIGINAL* work, because they are in the Google content-id program but he as a 'small' author, is not.

    Furthermore unlike their absurd licensing terms, he has quite reasonable royalty terms and licensing costs, something they will never have because of too many middlemen.