Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk's Extracurricular Antics Reportedly Spark a NASA Safety Probe At SpaceX (techcrunch.com)

The recent interview Elon Musk conducted with Joe Rogan, where Musk took one puff from a marijuana cigarette after a lengthy conversation around AI, social media and space, is prompting a NASA safety probe at SpaceX. The Washington Post reports that NASA was not amused with Musk's antics and has "ordered a safety review of SpaceX and Boeing as a response to the colorful chief executive's shenanigans," reports TechCrunch. From the report: In an interview, NASA associate administrator for human exploration, William Gerstenmaier, told the Post that the review will begin next year and would examine the "safety culture" of both Boeing and SpaceX. Rather than focus on the safety of the actual rockets, the Post said that the review would look at the hours employees work, drug policies, leadership and management styles, and the responsiveness of both companies to safety concerns from employees. The review is going to be led by the Office of Safety and Mission Assurance within NASA, which has conducted similar probes before, according to the Post report.

According to the NASA official, the process could be "pretty invasive," with the potential for hundreds of interviews with employees at every level and across all locations where the companies operate. At stake is the potential $6.8 billion in contracts the two companies received in 2014 to revive crewed missions to space. SpaceX grabbed $2.6 billion from NASA for the program, while the remainder went to Boeing. In a statement given to the Post, SpaceX said, "We couldn't be more proud of all that we have already accomplished together with NASA, and we look forward to returning human spaceflight capabilities to the United States."

225 comments

  1. They take it seriously by AlanObject · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My last company was supporting boards for the aerospace industry. They have all sorts of odd triggers when it comes to anything to do with "drugs."

    For some reason we didn't have to drug test our line workers that produced the product, but we did have to certify that the people who repaired the product with audited drug tests. Well it turns out to be one guy in our whole company who had to pee in a cup. I offered to do it with him even though I had nothing to do with manufacturing because I thought that was unfair. But it never went anywhere.

    Elon can be hip as he wants, but if he wants those sweet sweet government contracts he has to behave. If something goes BOOM down the line when it wasn't supposed to there is nobody at NASA who wants to report to the subsequent investigation that they weren't keeping tabs on vendors.

    1. Re:They take it seriously by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      No they don't. Not unless they are using hair or check swab tests, which are expensive (also relatively expensive to cheat on).

      Pee tests are designed to let 'crete and paint crews stay staffed. If they worked, the crews would be empty and work wouldn't get done.

      I've passed pee tests while reeking, red eyed, dry mouthed, babbling, stoned.

      It's been decades since I took a pee test sober, kind of a ritual. Though at this point, it's been a few years since I took one at all.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If he smoked in a legal state and in a legal manner he was behaving. He doesn't operate heavy machinery. I don't see a problem.

    3. Re: They take it seriously by murdocj · · Score: 1

      You won't until something blows up.

    4. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please stop with the "Reefer Madness" bullshit and hysterics...

      He could have smoked the whole joint and he'd still be more functional that people who use "socially acceptable" drugs like rx narcotics and alcohol...

    5. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The on-going reactions to that event are simply absurd. Jo had a special number rolled in tobacco leaf, the guy just wanted a taste, and he barely dragged on it enough smoke to even get a taste. The expression on his face at the time kinda indicates that he is not a regular smoker.
      I'm all for people posting a good joke on the webs about a person or incident that is worthy of a joke, but this shit-storm over nothing is just getting tedious.

    6. Re: They take it seriously by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If he smoked in a legal state and in a legal manner he was behaving.

      Some states have legalized pot, but selling, using, and possession are still federal offenses.

      Musk is a CEO, not a high school student. He needs to grow up.

    7. Re:They take it seriously by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're forgetting about that time the TSA found an overdue library book in Musk's carryon. That and a joint is two strikes. One speeding ticket in a red Tesla, and federosaurus mandatory sentencing kicks in.

    8. Re: They take it seriously by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Something blew up *before* he smoked it, so clearly the explosions cause the smoking.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if he does operate heavy machines there is no problem with it. One beer once a week is worse than 3 joints a night every night for the rest of your life.

      Most heavy equipment operators either drink or smoke dope. Same with welders, machinists and everyone else who makes everything you use.

      The government has unrealistic expectations. End of story. You'll find time and again some of the very best in their fields, sports, engineering, coding, etc. Smoke the fine fine green. The effects leave your system so fast as long as you smoked 2 or more hours ago last you are 100% stone cold sober.

    10. Re: They take it seriously by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      He simply should move his headquarter to Europe ... find a nice launch site on the many euqatorial islands or use ESA's site in French Guayana.

      I don't know how much infrastructure as in roads/rails he actually needs, but I could imagine he can find an island that has everything for him, including tropical storms.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    11. Re:They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The day they blame exploding rockets on a dude smoking pot is the day I officially quit reading any "news" and become a hermit.

    12. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the next rocket blows up do we blame the underperforming alcoholic middle manager at boeing, who hates his job so much he goes home and drowns it all out until tomorrow comes around?

    13. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Musk is an idiot, but that doesn't excuse the church lady prudes initiating this witch hunt. I doubt that the NASA church ladies would have gotten their panties in a knot if Musk had been swigging from a glass of scotch

    14. Re:They take it seriously by fafalone · · Score: 1

      It's just so stupid for an industry full of ostensibly smart people to test for whether someone has used pot in the last month but not test at all for alcohol, which impairs you a lot more than the weed you smoked last week. Not to mention all the other illegal drugs that are out of your system in a few days.

    15. Re: They take it seriously by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

      "Musk is a CEO, not a high school student. He needs to grow up."

      Oh really bill? Well how many CEOs have a whiskey or a beer on camera and no one fucking cares.

      Tell me why its not the same fucking thing. Its ludicrous. Your corporate america is fucking stupid as always. Ain't no reason for weed stigma. Clinging to childish stereotypes is a fear reflex. What happened to the nasa that fearlessly lead the race to the moon? Bloated and tired like your orange flavoured leader.

      --
      -
    16. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Musk is a CEO, not a high school student. He needs to grow up.

      Considering what he pulled of and how, you are saying with a straight face that Musk needs to "grow up"? How about you "chill the fuck out" instead and let someone competent make actual grown up decisions?

    17. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok fuckboi, here is the difference...MARIJUANA IS ILLEGAL AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL. It doesn't matter what your 'feelings' are like, it is still illegal whether we agree or not. If Musk wants to play with the adults, he has to play by their rules. Stop being a moron and grow up.

    18. Re: They take it seriously by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Well how many CEOs have a whiskey or a beer on camera and no one fucking cares.

      Tell me why its not the same fucking thing.

      The difference is that one is a federal crime.

      That doesn't matter much to a high school student, since the feds rarely go after end users. But for the CEO of a multi-billion dollar corporation, acting like an adult is more important.

    19. Re: They take it seriously by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      WTF does SpaceX's safety have to do with Musk's state of mind? He has almost nothing to do with day-to-day operations.

      This is political payback for something we haven't seen. Some senator is pissed with him, probably for something personal.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    20. Re:They take it seriously by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      Wankers would employ flat earthers though, so it is just virtue signalling.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    21. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The EU has waaay too many employee protections and safety laws for any of Musk's companies to do what it does.

    22. Re: They take it seriously by MrKaos · · Score: 5, Informative

      If he smoked in a legal state and in a legal manner he was behaving.

      Some states have legalized pot, but selling, using, and possession are still federal offenses.

      The Federal government has several very public incidences of where it has broken *it's own* laws. Enough of the population use Cannabis to suggest that Federal law on this subject is about as antiquated as alcohol prohibition, it's beyond time to end it in all western countries.

      Musk is a CEO, not a high school student. He needs to grow up.

      I think that the real issue is that Musk has quite effectively shown that people's attitude towards cannabis needs to mature. So if we are going to have a grown up conversation it is reasonable to point out that both Tobacco and alcohol kill you (eventually) when used as directed.

      Not that I mind a beer, however that should be the attitude towards Cannabis. No one ever gets into a tizzy about someone having a beer, you can even drive after one or two.

      If we were having a really grown-up conversation we would be discussing how the prison guard union lobbies against ending its prohibition because it allows prison populations to be sustained so that they stay in work. Same with the Prison companies who want a cheap controllable work force constantly available.

      Alcohol lobbyists are against ending cannabis prohibition because sales will go down, obviously, once people find out they can get wasted without having a hangover.

      Rayon corporation are against ending cannabis prohibition because sales of artificial thread will go down.

      There's more, these are the lobby points I remember off hand.

      However the best one, if anyone remembers Citizen Kane, is a story loosely based on William Randolph Hearst who worked very hard to criminalize cannabis so that he would not have to bare the costs of replacing his printing presses around the US when paper manufacturers found that paper made from cannabis was cheaper to make and a better product than wood pulp paper. IIRC it also requires less chlorine to produce hemp paper, so perhaps a grown-up conversation about cannabis could include the damage to the environment its prohibition has indirectly caused.

      In a way Musk has subtly shown that he isn't "that guy".

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    23. Re: They take it seriously by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      The difference is that one is a federal crime.

      The smart people at NASA should be able to look beyond the black/white legal issues, and focus on the real dangers. In that case, there's no practical difference between weed and whiskey.

    24. Re: They take it seriously by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Not just NASA, but DoD, cia, nsa, etc take this seriously.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    25. Re: They take it seriously by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 1

      If he smoked in a legal state and in a legal manner he was behaving. He doesn't operate heavy machinery. I don't see a problem.

      The problem is that it is still a schedule 1 drug by the "federal" government no matter what the "state" government says. And since NASA has to suck the fed's tit then it has to hard line to keep the fed money rolling.

      One day, when all the old white Nixon time pieces of shit retire or die off and younger peeps take their places, we might actually see some much needed reforms to this fucking stupid war on drugs bullshit and be able to use those funds to help fight wars that matter like domestic violence or homelessness or PTSD or the insane cost of health coverage or the insane amount of education debt, or, or, or. Anyway, what were we talking about?

    26. Re: They take it seriously by easyTree · · Score: 1

      What happened to the nasa that fearlessly lead the race to the moon?

      They're locked in basement room 58. The rest of the building is allocated to political contributions and red tape.

    27. Re: They take it seriously by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Musk is a CEO, not a high school student. He needs to grow up.

      I encourage you to actually watch the interview in question. Not only the part where he smokes pot but also the part where they discuss it a bit later. You'll find that he is far more grown up than those people who like to jump to conclusions based on soundbites and news headlines.

    28. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A recent hit piece in this same paper was found to be sponsored by Boeing via a PA company. I wouldn't be suprised if something similar happened. I've read peices where a quote from "Nasa" questioning SpaceX safety regarding their fueling method was literally from an embedded Boeing employee.

    29. Re:They take it seriously by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0

      That explains Elon's tendency to rebrand ancient old tech in new ways and pretend he invented it. Sounds like every junkie I've ever known.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    30. Re: They take it seriously by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0

      If by functional you mean pretending to be an engineer while renaming 100 year old technology and pretending that it is brand new and exciting, sure.

      If by functional you mean actually doing something worthwhile with his life instead of scamming the stock market, well, not so much.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    31. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      God damn that's that dumbest shit I've read today.

    32. Re: They take it seriously by Spamalope · · Score: 2

      You misspelled 'wealthy gov't contractors who don't want their feeding trough upset'.

    33. Re: They take it seriously by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      NASA is a federal agency, so from their perspective there is no such thing as a legal state. Don't get me wrong. The whole thing is phenomenally stupid. If you watch the footage Musk is quite explicit about his not smoking weed and why. On top of that unless they insist on complete abstinence from alcohol they already allow use of one of the most dangerous drugs on the planet.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    34. Re: They take it seriously by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Because he failed to tighten a valve? Because he left a dab of oil in LOX line? Because he missed a comma in control software? Because he made a mistake in the calculations? Oh, wait, he doesn't do any of these things. He's a fucking CEO. The worst his activity can blow up is the stock prices.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    35. Re: They take it seriously by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      SpaceX is not on the stock market. And Elon has contemplated taking Tesla off the stock market because apparently he felt it was holding them back by always forcing them to look at the short term.

      As for recycling 100 year old technology: why haven't Boeing, Lockheed and the others done reusable rockets then, instead of wasting billions of dollars making expensive non-reusable rockets that are four times as expensive as even a non-reused Falcon 9? After all, it's not like this is brand new and exciting technology, they could have done so ages ago. With all the money NASA would have saved, they could have been on Mars by now. So why haven't they?

      Or maybe the technology wasn't quite so simple and they all thought it was impossible.

    36. Re: They take it seriously by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Actually, he was also drinking quite a lot of whiskey during that interview. Few people seemed to mind, though.

    37. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF does SpaceX's safety have to do with Musk's state of mind? He has almost nothing to do with day-to-day operations.

      This is political payback for something we haven't seen. Some senator is pissed with him, probably for something personal.

      NASA depends on Russia to lift astronauts. They have vodka bottles as obligatory items aboard.

      Typical American puritanism.

    38. Re: They take it seriously by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Neither. It was expensive, but the concept existed just fine in 1915.

      Big Dumb Throwaway rockets were CHEAPER was the reason governments did it that way.

      Same with the pneumatic subway (hyperloop), the electric car (had those in the early days, but gasoline beat out batteries back then for energy density), and everything else Musk supposedly "invents".

      Don't buy into the hype machine.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    39. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem, "Big Dumb Throwaway" rockets are so much CHEAPER that they are four times as expensive as a non-reused Falcon 9, that's why Boeing, Lockheed and the others didn't bother".

      You sure make a lot of sense. I assume you were home-schooled?

    40. Re:They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The old line on pee tests is, 'dilution is the solution'

      Point being that you can drink enough water (about a gallon the day before and another gallon the day of the test) to dilute the specimen enough to go below the detection limit.

      To counteract this, the testing companies check for total dissolved solid (TDS, mostly urea) to see if you are diluting the specimen. At this point they can send the sample through mass spectrometry, which has a MUCH lower detection limit to see if you were trying to cover drug use.

      And... the counter to this is to take fairly large doses of Creatine, some B vitamins (for color, since they can still send to a mass spectrometer if doubtful) along with a mild diuretic on the day of the test , which is what is normally in the 'Pass any urine test' products.

      As far as selection requirements for testing goes, companies are NOT required to test every employee (beyond pre-employment screenings), but rely on randomized samplings and for-cause testing (after an accident of some sort).

      Many companies have moved away from urine tests (which can show positive for a month after last use) and to cheek swab tests (not expensive at all) which show use in the past 8-10 hours.

      Just had to post this after seeing hornwumpus's BS post.

      FYI, at this point drug testing STILL exists to pad the profits of drug testing companies like Concentra or Sonora Labs.

    41. Re: They take it seriously by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Inventing is not just about having a concept like "maybe we can let a rocket land on its tail". It's also about actually making it work. Even the latest rocket being designed by NASA today, the SLS, is an expensive throwaway rocket. So what's the reason today?

      Your advice to innovators seems to be "stop innovating, because you're just pretend engineers that are recycling old ideas". Fortunately, the actual innovators aren't listening to you and are actually pushing human society forward.

      Have you ever invented anything?

    42. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA is a Federal agency, not a State agency. Federal government still has marajuana illegal (both recreational and medical) which (currently, till a court decides otherwise) overrides any State legalization. Same would probably be true if USA-illegal drugs were done in another country where they were legal.
      This is a contradictions, but is the current state of affairs.

    43. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is the CEO of the company going. To make things blow up. Iâ(TM)d love to hear this line of reasoning...

    44. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tldr drink gallons of water and finish with a Rockstar.

    45. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like most, you are missing the necessary experience of running an organization in a political environment. NASA is a publicly funded entity in a democratic state. The fact that some meaningful portion of the voting populous does believe that marijuana is dangerous is sufficient to behave as if it were, regardless of facts. The consequences of not doing so is risking losing some direct funding or project allocations.

      Welcome to government by the people, for the people. Politicians 2500 years ago in Athens complained about the same thing.

      No need for inventing dastardly mustache-twirling plots when mundane status quo will do.

    46. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A non reused falcon 9. How many of them do we have lying around at space X?

    47. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont forget the drug companies who once fought so hard against it so that they could continue to make money off of opioid prescriptions. The same ones that are now clambering to buy up the companies producing marijuana products for legal markets. Marijuana makes for great long term pain control with less side effects and no physical addiction (the mental addiction is a slightly different story and a completely different argument)

      This is just another episode in the long list of people who want to enforce their personal ideals onto to everyone else.

      Any corporate resistance and insistence that marijuana is bad from any corporate stand point because it is an easy plant to grow and process into many different products which makes it hard to make a profit off of (low cost of entry).

      I live in an area where it is legal to grow my own, and you can bet that i am. This is win win, its much cheaper for me to smoke every now and then (i prefer it to adult beverages) and I do not feed any money into criminal enterprises.

    48. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably got less to do with the pot and more to do with reports that he doesn't allow standard industrial safety at his factories because 1) It will slow things down 2) he doesn't like loud sounds 3) he doesn't like the color yellow.

      Frankly I can't believe he hasn't been audited by the feds for labor violations already.

    49. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please explain the pre-employment and for-cause caveats. I've never required my employees to do either. What would "require" those?

    50. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA, a federal agency, would go by federal law. In what states does the federal government consider marijuana use to be legal?

    51. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pothead. Federal jobs are bery stikt on alcohauh use. >3 a day, no weigh! Check the DSM-V? Sorry too drink to spelll

    52. Re: They take it seriously by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      True that.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    53. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When companies enter into contracts with the government (research grants, military procurement, building highways, etc...) there are clauses that require that they maintain a Drug Free Workplace.

      Here is a reminder that being in a state with legal or medical marijuana does not exempt contractors from compliance.
      Both federal employees and contractors are still subject to the Drug Free Workplace Act, which says that companies that receive a federal contract of $100,000 or more and organizations that receive a federal grant of any size must maintain a drug-free policy.

      In the case of pre-employment testing, the intent was to starve any drug user into compliance with the law by denying them employment, thereby freeing society of drug use (seriously, this came out of the Reagan Whitehouse).

      In the case of for-cause testing, they can send a person to take a drug test after a car or equipment accident or an on the job accident at work. The idea is that drugs may be the cause of the accident.

  2. What is wrong with these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    NASA is spending American tax dollars to investigate a company's employees' off hours activities - based on the CEO participating in a legal activity; at least in California.

    What a waste. No wonder NASA can't get a man to the moon anymore.

    1. Re: What is wrong with these people? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Sadly, the Fed-scum still keep it illegal at their level...

    2. Re: What is wrong with these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, clearly Trump is stoned even as we speak. Also wasted. Loaded. Hopped. Jerked. Twerked. Krunked.

    3. Re: What is wrong with these people? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Trump is high on his own Alzheimer's...

    4. Re:What is wrong with these people? by Shaitan · · Score: 2

      NASA is federal, it isn't legal anywhere as far as the feds are concerned.

    5. Re:What is wrong with these people? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Even feds can't find juries to convict and they know it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:What is wrong with these people? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You can hang a jury, but you can't convict.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:What is wrong with these people? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Troll-boy doesn't realize that the death penalty isn't an option for the jury in those cases, unless he's from Iran or Saudi Arabia (which may not have jury trials anyway).

    8. Re:What is wrong with these people? by sunking2 · · Score: 2

      Let's take a look at the last Soyuz. A simple manufacturing issue. This is why random drug and alcohol tests are tied to an entire contract, whether you work in the office on the program or in manufacturing. Not saying this was the cause of the soyuz, but the job of NASA is to reduce risk when dealing with programs costs in the millions and ultimately billions.

    9. Re:What is wrong with these people? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      I will convict any fucking pot smoker to the death penalty.

      By stoning?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    10. Re:What is wrong with these people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      Most countries have no jury trials.

      A jury made sense when in britain they decided a culprit should be judged by his "peers".
      And it made sense in the US (somewhat) when "law must have been spoken" but there was no competent law system established. Or in other words, the law system was a judge and a jury or a self proclaimed jury and an executor ...

      Trials by jury are considered archaic and primitive by most states of law.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    11. Re:What is wrong with these people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      No! By letting him smoke a lethal dose!!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    12. Re: What is wrong with these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drug addict self-identified.

    13. Re:What is wrong with these people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First of all: the drugs I take at time out of work, usually don't affect my work, as I sleep about 8h before I go to work. So, assuming a worker had made a mistake which causes a defect, under drugs, is obviously not very plausible.
      Secondly, to let a defect escape into production says that there is something wrong with the process. Regardless if the "cause" was a person under drugs. Perhaps all people in the chain of the process are under drugs?
      Thirdly: consuming drugs at work, or working under influence of mind or body altering drugs obviously should be prohibited. No one likes a drunk plane pilot ... But where do you draw the line? Is coffee a drug? What about pain killers? It is not even a decade ago that it was common that vending machines inside of big companies sold beer to the staff (in Germany) ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    14. Re:What is wrong with these people? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Is coffee a drug?

      Yes, a performance enhancing one.

      What about pain killers?

      Obviously. But really what you're showing here is quite a bit of ignorance on the topic. "Drugs" aren't banned, rather quite specific drugs that have quite specific performance related effects are banned. And yes there are several pain killers that would show up on my drug screen on the way into work which would result in me being either not allowed either on site or being banned from undertaking certain activities.

    15. Re:What is wrong with these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, coffee is a drug, but a very mild one, unless you overdose quite severely. Not sure how or what the limits on that works, mostly I suppose because caffeine doesn't really have any negative side-effects until you get to the stage where you're quite obviously physically ill and instead of being able to perform your duties, need medical attention.

      And yes, painkillers are drugs too, at least a lot of them, especially the morphine based ones. Such are however not available without a prescription and usually clearly labeled with a red triangle, marking them as rendering you unsuitable for driving etc. It would take a pretty irresponsible individual to take such drugs and still preform some kind of task which demands your attention. Most however will probably just incapacitate you by making you very ill before you become a hazard. Note that the "bad" drugs will show up as eg. some kind of opioid rather than "oxycotin" if you test for them, since that's the active substance, and as such rendering the "painkiller" argument moot.

      Disclaimer: I'm neither a medically trained person, nor a chemist, so I'm sure there are others better qualified to reply. It should be a reasonable starting point though.

    16. Re:What is wrong with these people? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Trials by jury are considered archaic and primitive by most states of law.

      Things America values and you've spoken out against:
      * Soap box
      * Ballot box
      * Jury Box
      * Ammo box

      We think we're more important than our government. You disagree, I get it.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    17. Re:What is wrong with these people? by coofercat · · Score: 1

      ...and yet withdrawal from coffee (caffeine) is most definitely something that could impact your ability to do your job. There's a discussion about the soyuz production line above, and maybe someone with too little caffeine one day tightened a bolt to the wrong torque.

      There are more things than drugs that can affect your performance. There's usually a system of double-checks to make sure one persons performance isn't critical in the creation of anything important. Thus, Musk or anyone else's performance isn't really relevant - the process for risk mitigation might be, but that's not really being called into question here.

      If I had to guess, I'd call this a 'shake down'. Some powerful people have used a slightly controversial public act against the company for their own ends. As 'wrong' as it might be for such a thing to take place, it was arguably naive of Musk to give them such an opportunity.

    18. Re:What is wrong with these people? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Nothing is wrong insofar as the probe is concerned. They are just doing their jobs, they have done those probes before, and Boeing is getting the full treatment as well. The actual reason probably had more to do with the recent mishap with Soyuz. Stating that this is because of Musk having one single toke (the article summary amazingly getting that part right for a change) and a sip of liquor is 100% political PR bullshit. Either someone has an axe to grind with Musk, or some Puritan exec somewhere in the pecking order got his panties in a bunch.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    19. Re:What is wrong with these people? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Obviously. But really what you're showing here is quite a bit of ignorance on the topic. "Drugs" aren't banned, rather quite specific drugs that have quite specific performance related effects are banned. And yes there are several pain killers that would show up on my drug screen on the way into work which would result in me being either not allowed either on site or being banned from undertaking certain activities.

      Opiates can have zero effect on your performance or reaction times, it would depend entirely on your dosage and tolerance. Cannabis has no performance or neurological effect that would increase or decrease performance, reaction times or safety anymore than cigarettes would.

      The problem is that outside alcohol there has been almost no research on any of the other drugs that would conclusively prove impairment. And that's the exact problem, they were declared bad and added to a list without any scientific effort to validate that it could impair the user and at what dosage that impairment occurs. People that support the war on drugs and federal blanket bans on them generally have been told these lies their entire life and have no idea that none of this has ever been researched.

      Anything labeled Schedule 1 can't even be researched without permission by the DEA and you think the guys getting paid to ban drugs are going to allow research into the drugs that might prove they are harmless?

    20. Re:What is wrong with these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm totally for ending Marijuana prohibition. I'm also totally for some companies to have policies about usage. For example, while I don't mind if you smoke before your shift, I do mind if you're fucking stoned out of your gourd trying to drive a school bus (jokes about stopping to get fast food notwithstanding). Same with alcohol, really, but we all know that guy (gal) who doesn't give a shit and fucks it up for everyone else. I've literally heard people make this argument, "it's legal!" and insist that means they can do it at any time. No, jerkoff, you can't operate the fucking forklift blazed. Get the fuck off and go the fuck home and don't come back.

    21. Re:What is wrong with these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i should rephrase that as "I don't mind if you smoke AFTER your shift" jesus christ I'm stoned

    22. Re:What is wrong with these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hold up, I mean two of those things *are* government and the other two are of little practical use in modern states.

    23. Re:What is wrong with these people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I never spoke against a soap box, unless it is empty, that would be a shame, or a ballot box.
      However the voting system of the US is also so archaic that we outsiders laugh about it, or sometimes feel symphatic with the crowd that regularly gets excluded from voting.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    24. Re:What is wrong with these people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The problem is that people are mixing up drug usage as in consumption with drug abuse.

      If someone cares that someone else took MDH during a rave party at the last weekend then the former, not the later has a mental problem. Luckily drug tests are illegal in Europe and can only be done under court order or in military like environments, otherwise our economy would probably break down completely. (I don't even want to look to scandinavia)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    25. Re:What is wrong with these people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Cannabis has no performance or neurological effect that would increase or decrease performance, reaction times or safety anymore than cigarettes would.
      Of course it has. Cannabis can have extremely high effects. But as always: it depends on the dose, or dose over time. Most people don't consume enough to have negative effects or drawbacks, but you see enough people in areas where cannabis consumption in public is tolerated that are heavily affected.

      People that support the war on drugs and federal blanket bans on them generally have been told these lies their entire life and have no idea that none of this has ever been researched.
      Research on drugs is a big thing in Switzerland. Many doctors give up their jobs e.g. in Europe to work in Switzerland in research projects or simply in hospitals were treatment with e.g. LSD is allowed.

      allow research into the drugs that might prove they are harmless? Consumed with sense, most drugs are close to harmless, like alcohol. However the fact that they are illegal makes same expensive. The fact that they are expensive makes the producers mix them with other things, to thin them out. Not knowing the concentration of the drug in the final mixture makes them unsafe to use, and the stuff mixed in might be dangerous. Once there was a case where a pusher/dealer mixed in rat poison. The fact that they are unsafe and expensive goes on the health of the consumers. Being unhealthy is one of the parts leading to addiction. Addiction is often not caused by the drug itself but the mixed in stuff, e.g. pain killers. And from here the vicious circle of crime to get the money to get the drug starts.

      All that would be avoided if you simply could get your cannabis, heroine and cocaine at the next pharmacy, at a reasonable price, taxed like tobacco.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    26. Re:What is wrong with these people? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      ...and yet withdrawal from coffee (caffeine) is most definitely something that could impact your ability to do your job.

      Withdrawal from anything you're addicted to would, including doing non-drug related things like addictions to masturbation or addictive drugs that have no actual performance impact on the body like nicotine, or simply a change in diet can induce withdrawal symptoms as well.

      Side note: I called in sick for 2 days when I quit caffeine.

      The answer is not to focus on drugs in that case but rather the process of withdrawals. Your brain is fully of funky shit that could impact your performance, but it's silly to combine these all under one banner.

    27. Re:What is wrong with these people? by lgw · · Score: 1

      You've never advocated banning hate speech? I forget your exact position on the Brexit vote, but tell me how much you object to the EU's approach of just having nations vote on the same initiative every couple of years until "the voters finally get it right".

      or sometimes feel symphatic with the crowd that regularly gets excluded from voting.

      I'm also sympathetic to illegal Mexicans, but they should certainly be excluded from voting in the US.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    28. Re:What is wrong with these people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I forget your exact position on the Brexit vote
      The BREXIT will be a disaster (it actually is already) for the UK. That is my only opinion. I would have loved to work a year or two there ... so lets see how they manage work permits etc. after the BREXIT. If I need special work permits it is not worth the hassle.

      but tell me how much you object to the EU's approach of just having nations vote on the same initiative every couple of years until "the voters finally get it right".
      The EU does not have this approach. Then again, UK will probably vote about the BREXIT again.

      I'm also sympathetic to illegal Mexicans, but they should certainly be excluded from voting in the US.
      Sure. And what about the many legal americans who are blocked from voting every year?

      E.g. requiring a week before the midterms that in some states all native americans living in reservations need a street address and house number to be allowed to vote? In some reservations they ran around night and day to set up street signs and hand out house numbers to parcels of land that never had such things.

      A girl I know wrote a 2 pages rant about what happened in the USA last months attempting to block millions of voters from being able to vote. Perhaps I can copy it here.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    29. Re:What is wrong with these people? by lgw · · Score: 1

      "Millions of voters" is propaganda. Dozens of voters is reality.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    30. Re:What is wrong with these people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Lol,
      a single indian reservation with a million inhabitants is: millions of voters. Even if it is only 0.5 million who have voting rights. Granted, there wont be many like that, and I don't know how big the particular one she mentioned is. The estimation is that up to 20 million voters got hurdles thrown there way to prevent them from voting. No idea if that is true, but my friend gave me a huge list of incidents and that surely is more than one million cases.
      Anyway, she posted it on facebook, and I have to search it ... and I'm at the moment not in the mood ... but if you are interested I do it next days. (It is a long post).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  3. This is payback for .. by najajomo · · Score: 1, Troll

    This is payback for him not letting the vulture investors continually short the company.
    --

    Incidentally, don't you think ten mentions of Microsoft on the front page is a little much, even for the Microsoft slashdot.

    1. Re:This is payback for .. by bug_hunter · · Score: 1

      Are you sure NASA safety protocols are at the mercy of the wants of vulture investors?

      --
      It's turtles all the way down.
    2. Re:This is payback for .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's because they don't want a drugged out ("taking Tesla private at $420") CEO who works 100+ hours a week and feels it is perfectly fine to build products in tents in charge of a company they need to entrust human lives to

  4. Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    In 20 years taking a toke will be like opening a beer. Musk has gotten to where he is because he not only takes risks, he spends a lot of time and effort reducing them.

    So, you gonna compare Elon with the risk takers who said "don't launch" in 1986, or the risk takers who said "launch".

    1. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 20 years? Do you live in 1998? It's here NOW, brochacho!

    2. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 20 years taking a toke will be like opening a beer.

      In 20 years? Do you live in 1998? It's here NOW, brochacho!

      Not quite. In fact, not even remotely.

      Now think about what he said and actually try to imagine 20 years from now. If 20 years from now, nobody cares that you smoke weed, then that would mean the old lady next door doesn't care. Your mom doesn't care. Your're a doctor and your patients don't care.

      Yeah see, we are not at that point.

    3. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Why should patients care if their doctor smokes weed outside of working and on-call hours? Probably safer than them being a drunk or opioid addict.

    4. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You should see how the old men and ladies take to weed, once it's legal.

      'Old' generally comes with pain.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should patients care if their doctor smokes weed.

      Because I want a competent doctor not a retard pot head.

    6. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      If your doctor smokes anything you need to find a new one. Inhaling smoke is not a good idea.

    7. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Frankly, it's his/her body, and what they do with it off the clock is none of my fucking business. If they know the risks, I don't see this as worse than a doctor who rock climbs or races motorcycles as a hobby.

    8. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Many competent and intelligent people use pot and other drugs. One doesn't preclude the other.

    9. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many incompetent and unintelligent people use pot and other drugs. One does preclude the other.

      Fixed that for.

    10. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're not at that point with alcohol, either. Teetotalers (and presumably wannabe booze barons?) keep popping up and trying to re-implement prohibition a bit at a time because it was such a great success the first time around.

    11. Re: Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the pot in my doctors brain magically clears the moment he goes on shift or has to come in off-hours for emergency surgery?

      I am sooooo glad my spine surgeon wasnt a giggling stupid incompetent pot head like you. If you were not a stoner you could see how utterly fucking stupid you sound.

    12. Re: Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Dins · · Score: 1

      Your anti-cannabis attitude, whether troll or not, is in the minority here. Both at /. and in the United States as a whole. in the United States as a whole.

    13. Re: Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Dins · · Score: 1

      oops. I fail at HTML...

    14. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Dins · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm a Gen-Xer and my parents were always VERY against drugs of any sort. Then later in life (late 70s, early 80s), my mom got cancer. My dad actually bought her some weed from a waitress they knew at a restaurant they frequented.

      Unfortunately, he baked it into something and she definitely did NOT enjoy the edible experience. I wish they had talked to me about it before this happened instead of after. For the record, they lived in Arizona, and I'm in Wisconsin.

    15. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For every one of those people you can find.... I can find 20 complete burnout unreliable as fuck useless wastes of life potheads.

      that's the problem. bad odds.

    16. Re: Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish but the largest real estate investment company in all of Canada just told every single tenant of theirs (which is probably at least 10% of a renters) they can't smoke it, vape it, eat it, or wear it. If you have a prescription they will let you eat it.

      Imagine the outrage if your landlord told you that they'll evict you if they see you drinking a beer through your living room window.

      Yet half of the tenants actually like that they ban eating it. Because most people are desperate to control others, deep down.

      And that's Canada where the shit is legal to toke on the sidewalk in front of the cop shop.

    17. Re: Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it does magically clear. It's called sleeping a full 8 hours. Unless your doc went hog wild eating an entire weed chocolate bar, he is as sober as you'll ever see him the next day. Probably more so since pot puts you to sleep pretty quick.

    18. Re: Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation needed. Show one example of someone who has been mentally damaged enough to need to be institutionalized from only pot. I dare you. It just doesn't work that way. If you smoke too much, you fall asleep. Then a few hours later, you're back to normal. Its obvious you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Go smoke a bowl and you'll see for yourself how stupid you sound when you try to talk about things of which you have no understanding.

    19. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should patients care if their doctor smokes weed outside of working and on-call hours? Probably safer than them being a drunk or opioid addict.

      Yeah, Hypocrisy aside, the medical class is known for cocaine, opiate abuse [even airline pilots do it].

    20. Re: Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Quebec, most cities banned it outside everywhere.

    21. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what? You'd think that medical personnel of all, would know the risks of smoking. Yet, they are extremely over represented among smokers. (Talking about tobacco here, not pot, but it's not like that's all that great either...)

      If you have a doctor, there is a decent chance he or she actually is a smoker.

  5. NASA is irrelevantly corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone believe that this actually has anything to do with safety? This is directly due to competition sucking off their elected representatives and then demanding what they want during their post-coital pillowtalk.

    1. Re:NASA is irrelevantly corrupt by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Boeing knows that hair testing their crew would be very ungood for them.

      This is the feds smacking ol' Musky on the nose with a newspaper for stepping out of line. The last of the drug warriors haven't died off, but are butthurt as fuck.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re: NASA is irrelevantly corrupt by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, most will be in nursing homes in the next decade or so, though...

    3. Re:NASA is irrelevantly corrupt by murdocj · · Score: 1

      What are you on?

  6. no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it's because SpaceX's engineering culture is pretty well summed up as "fuck it". It has nothing to do with Musk taking a toke. Yes, Boeing will do one too because someone wrote a nastygram about Boeing.

    1. Re: no by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

      SpaceX has done what NASA and Boeing have been unable to do. The "fuck it" culture works, apparently.

    2. Re: no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoever is paying you to post should stop, You're horrible at shilling.

    3. Re: no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no NASA shuttle ever got anybody killed....

    4. Re: no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OJ Simpson got away with murder that means murder must be legal. Hillary Clinton got away with using perusal email for government purposes that means it must be legal and ivanka did nothing wrong.

    5. Re: no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pointing out verifiable facts is shilling?

    6. Re: no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA doesn't build rockets, NASA funded contractors do.

      SpaceX has a lot of government contracts

    7. Re: no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They will get people killed just like Tesla has murdered three people with their half assed self crashing implementation.

      Then they have a ways to go yet to catch NASA's kill count.

    8. Re: no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SpaceX has at least 10 times the budget compared to what NASA was allowed to spend on rockets. Almost any culture "works" if you can just throw more and more money at every problem.

    9. Re: no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, all your post means is that you're a retard. Sorry. Please report for your euthanasia.

  7. Puritanical party poopers... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Typical of the US at large.. partaking in pleasurable activities leads to blacklisting. I don't like Musk for his Tesla spare parts policies and other reasons, but this is just abusive and stupid.

  8. This could be a big deal by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    Any major contractor for Orion receives a random drug test. If you fail you can no longer work on the program until you go through a rehab period. The testing includes alcohol, pot, opiodes, etc. This is actually a pretty big concern now for the likes of Lockheed as they are outside of Denver. While a Drs prescription will get you out of it for your painkillers they don't give a rats ass for any medical marijuana card. I actually have to be very careful if for example I'm paired up on a ski lift with someone who decides to toke it up.

    1. Re:This could be a big deal by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The tests can't tell pot from Marinol (or it's other brand name).

      Works for DOT and FAA tests. Drs are much more relaxed and informed about these drugs vs 20 years ago.

      The standard pee test can be beat by a highschool dropout. But for the nervous (or owners of high stakes licences), Marinol does the trick.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:This could be a big deal by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Their drug tests can't distinguish between levels of THC metabolites from second-hand smoke and levels of THC actually likely to get someone high. Welcome to Dumberica, I guess, land of the Puritans, home of the zealots.

    3. Re:This could be a big deal by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that *it is a violation of Federal law*, and is also a violation of Federal Acquisition Regulations. The states can play like it is legal but the supremacy clause definitely applies, and if you violate federal law while working under a federal contract, you *will* have consequences, period.

    4. Re:This could be a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marinol can be distinguished from natural cannabis:
      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...

    5. Re: This could be a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tenth amendment says the federal government should go fuck itself.

    6. Re:This could be a big deal by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      By drug tests? By drug tests that cost less than $100?

      The answer on the ground is 'no', might change, but doubtful.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  9. Good idea by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's a good idea, because Musk has a joystick that he uses to remotely pilot each launched rocket, and must always have his wits about him to insure that the rockets don't crash and burn. Sorry, but this is just a bit ridiculous on NASA's part.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Good idea by murdocj · · Score: 1

      No, he's merely the guy who sets the tone and makes the decisions. Kinda nice if that guy isn't crazy or stoned when human lives are at stake.

    2. Re:Good idea by apoc.famine · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You realize he took a puff, didn't like it, and said he never gets high, don't you? That's what makes this entire thing a stupid farce. Prior to his Joe Rogan appearance, I generally assumed he was a major stoner, due to the crazy shit he comes up with. That's where we learned that he wasn't.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    3. Re:Good idea by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Seems pretty unlikely to be the case. If you bothered to watch the interview this whole tempest in a tea pot stems from, it doesn't seem like he's much into smoking pot. He seems genuinely surprised when Rogan lights up spliff and asks if it's a cigar, isn't sure whether it's legal or not, and then takes a tiny drag that he doesn't seem to inhale.

      Possibly still crazy, but not likely to be a stoner.

    4. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that interview proved that musk is weak to peer pressure...

      also not good.

    5. Re:Good idea by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The WaPo article this is based on doesn't directly link Musk's behaviour to the investigation, which is also looking a Boeing.

      https://www.washingtonpost.com...

      Seems like they are just doing their due diligence and checking out both the companies that will be putting humans in space for them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Good idea by c · · Score: 1

      I'm strongly suspecting that this is just a convenient excuse to do something NASA was already planning on doing.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    7. Re:Good idea by aicrules · · Score: 1

      And moreso, he also pilots Boeing's rockets. Because why else would a Boeing security review also be triggered? Oh wait maybe it's just a random abuse of power that someone wanted an excuse to run up an expense account.

  10. Ridiculous by Shaitan · · Score: 1

    Absolutely ridiculous. Even this language is so outdated as to be absurd "a marijuana cigarette."

    So NASA no longer cares about the quality of the actual output of SpaceX, now they are all about policing the off-hours behavior of a contractors employees?

    Literally every old timer in management and administration who embraces this sort of philosophy needs to be given the boot. Call it early retirement. If they are this backwards and antiquated on topics like this it's no wonder they are so slow and antiquated on their methodologies in other areas.

    1. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed, time to send these old farts packin

  11. Joint Venture by mentil · · Score: 1

    Anyone notice how SpaceX rockets look like giant joints, smoking their way off into the cosmos? Coincidence?!

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Joint Venture by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      What strain are you smoking? Cause I'm growing it, next year!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Joint Venture by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Anyone notice how SpaceX rockets look like giant joints, smoking their way off into the cosmos? Coincidence?!

      That's SpaceX should develop a "Rocket Bong", sales would be huge.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  12. Alcohol anyone? by george14215 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why doesn't NASA open an investigation into itself to figure out who drinks alcohol...a more potent and dangerous drug.

    1. Re:Alcohol anyone? by quenda · · Score: 3, Funny

      Archival photo of the NASA drug enforcement team:

      https://www.hq.nasa.gov/pao/Hi...

    2. Re:Alcohol anyone? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      I always found it hilarious that no one in the movie "Hidden Figures" was shown smoking, when in reality the whole crew would have been puffing like old steam engines.

    3. Re:Alcohol anyone? by quenda · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I always found it hilarious that no one in the movie "Hidden Figures" was shown smoking, when in reality the whole crew would have been puffing like old steam engines.

      Probably not in mission control though. The only photos I saw of smoking there were the after-mission cigars.

      And "Hidden Figures" cares little for facts. They show gender and racial segregation at NASA that did not exist. OK, there were was a little bit:
      "Katherine (then Goble) was originally unaware that the East Side bathrooms were segregated, and used the unlabeled "whites-only" bathrooms for years before anyone complained.[19] She ignored the complaint, and the issue was dropped."
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    4. Re:Alcohol anyone? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      And "Hidden Figures" cares little for facts.

      They made a conscious decision to incorporate some elements from wider society at the time, and to dramatise events to help convey the character's feelings and struggles. Voice-over internal monologues don't work so well on film.

      That's fairly standard stuff with historical dramas. The goal is not really to give you an accurate history lesson, it's to help you understand the wider issues and the context of the time, to generate empathy and to provide some entertainment.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Alcohol anyone? by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      Parent is right. 60% of men smoked in the Apollo Era. Even the submarines had ashtrays.

    6. Re:Alcohol anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention being a calculator back then wasn't some super genius computer programmer mathematician job, but literally spending days doing basic arithmetic on a matrix. One of the first jobs to go as soon as basic computers became available.

    7. Re:Alcohol anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know what? I'm sick of those excuses.

      Those putting these crap "dramas" out there in front of people in the name of profit should be punished for betraying the foundations of our society, not summarily excused by "it's entertainment". Ultimately it doesn't matter what you call it; It's a false version of historical events, and it still shapes peoples perception - in some cases you could even argue that it indoctrinates them. This is how we end up with retarded Americans who think they saved Europe from the Nazis in 1918, when they in actuality where Johnny-come-lately, and only there to save the bacon of the New York bankers who couldn't afford a British defeat, rather than actually being the indirect cause of them in the first place.

  13. Chill out a have a qualude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, these guys need to smoke a big reefer!

  14. Yes, this is an excellent use of taxpayer money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good job, NASA.

  15. Never A Straight Answer does it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is payback for not falling in line. TPTB does NOT like people who do their own thing, and then succeed where they where unwilling.
    So just because 1 guy smoked a joint the entire company is "unsafe"? Fuck this shit!

  16. Drug Policies? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    How is that even a part of the criteria? If everyone is wondering around stoned all day and still achieving their objectives safely (not that I suspect that to be the case) it should be a point in favor of open drug policies, not a point against the safety measured through an objective lens.

    1. Re:Drug Policies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because of the eternal truism: authoritarians are dumb assholes.

  17. Lobbyists Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boeing (and Lockheed Martin, and ULA, and all the corporate bastages) are flexing their muscle.

    They have lots of lobbyists (and employ lots of middle managers in a lot of districts!) that are unemployable outside of the military industrial complex.

    Think of the engineers, people! White collar welfare doesn't stand a chance without some investigations!

  18. I can see where they are coming from, but... by rnmartinez · · Score: 1

    this does seem a bit extreme. Probably more of a "where there's smoke, there's fire" precaution - maybe they think that everyone is smoking up and that's OK, but it seems like an extreme overreaction. Also seems like poor due diligence - if Elon hadn't lit up a joint, then they would just assume that everything is OK, even if the production line is stoned 24x7? To me, if SpaceX/Beoing/etc... are going to be responsible for restoring space flight to the U.S., this should have happened upfront, regardless of what happens in the public eye or not.

    1. Re:I can see where they are coming from, but... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      If the CEO is smoking up in public, it tells his workers that it's okay. So, they want to make sure it's not allowed at work.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:I can see where they are coming from, but... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      The workers are smart enough to work at SpaceX. They already know it is OK.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  19. Musk just sell everything for scrap by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    Say "fuck it", scrap everything in spacex. Show the government what a loss to humanity a mind like yours would be.

    --
    [($)]
  20. The Military Industrial Complex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does not like disruption. All your loosey-goosey cheap rockets are clearly a profit safety violation. For fuck's sake we use cheap Russian rockets.

  21. Safety Probe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Safety Probe!" I shouted as I rammed the rocket shaped dildo deeper and deeper

    1. Re:Safety Probe! by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      "Safety Probe!" I shouted as I rammed the rocket shaped dildo deeper and deeper

      At NASA it's actually called a Auditing Nasa's Alimentary Limitation Probe and from what I heard it can be quite intrusive.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  22. Musk is a marketing powerhouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He has generated hundreds of millions in free publicity and made Tesla a formidable brand. He just needs a leash

  23. Mechanic? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    Do they think Musk is turning wrenches? Installing fasteners on his launchers? What the f*ck is wrong at NASA?

    1. Re:Mechanic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Funding secured" tweets show he is off his rocker sometimes.

  24. Rope that pony! by seoras · · Score: 4, Insightful

    SpaceX is so far ahead with recycling rockets (= lower launch cost & better margins) that the incumbent rocket contractors appear to have pulled some strings to attempt to slow them down or discount them from the running. Someone needs breathing space to catch up.

    In a better world you'd spend 100% of your time focusing on innovating and improving technology instead of wasting time fighting the status quo.

    1. Re:Rope that pony! by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      SpaceX is so far ahead with recycling rockets (= lower launch cost & better margins) that the incumbent rocket contractors appear to have pulled some strings to attempt to slow them down or discount them from the running. Someone needs breathing space to catch up.

      That sounds exactly right. "Oh we're auditing Boeing too!" Yeah, with 1/10th as many requests for interviews and documentation.

      Did anybody notice the weasel-wording of the contract values?

      SpaceX grabbed $2.6 billion from NASA for the program, while the remainder went to Boeing.

      Sounds so much better than "Boeing got $1.6 billion more than SpaceX to do the same job SpaceX is doing, only slower."

  25. Federal Laws matter for Federal Contracts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Federal Laws matter for Federal Contracts.
    Marijuana is illegal throughout the USA by federal law.

    I think it is a dumb law, since pot is safer than alcohol, but as a federal contractor, I was drug tested randomly, at least once a year. The people paying the bills get to set the rules.

    1. Re:Federal Laws matter for Federal Contracts by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      The people paying the bills get to set the rules.

      Considering the state of lobbying in the US, never has a truer sentence been said.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  26. Brett Buttfuck here to explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brett Buttfuck here to explain why Ivanka is DEFINITELY going to FEDERAL PRISON.

  27. Mellow fellow by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Elon: "Relaaax, it's not like we're doing rocket science here."

  28. Re: missing the point blue ribbon winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only a reefer madness nutcase such as yourself believes the effects of a drag on a joint last longer than a few hours. Do you think Musk went straight home and designed a space shuttle immediately after using?

    I mean, shit, have you never even drank a single beer? Cannabis lasts a few hours and then it's gone. If it lasted for months or was permanent drug dealers wouldn't be in business for long.

    I agree working on spacecraft while high or stoned or drunk or just addled on legal drugs is a dumb idea. But guess what? Even Elon takes a few hours or even days of break now and again.

    I seriously can't believe I have to explain this to you. Go talk with a pharmacist, they know the entire book on how long various drugs last. They will set you straight.

  29. applied logic by Tom · · Score: 2

    Because Musk is personally building and piloting those things. Right. Makes sense.

    This american fascination with colourful CEOs has gone too far. What more does it take for you guys to understand that it's all a circus? Who cares? Sure CEOs matter, but not half as much as a good engineering team.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:applied logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Musk is personally building and piloting those things. Right. Makes sense.

      He is the boss, he says how things are going to run so you cannot always ignore his antics. I remember an extreme case of a business owner being barred from interfering in the day to day operations of his own restaurants, he was the root cause of repeated food safety issues despite never touching anything himself.

    2. Re:applied logic by Tom · · Score: 1

      He is the boss, he says how things are going to run so you cannot always ignore his antics

      Really? Why not? Can you prove any effect whatsoever of my bosses drug habits on me?

      I remember an extreme case of a business owner being barred from interfering in the day to day operations of his own restaurants, he was the root cause of repeated food safety issues despite never touching anything himself.

      One data point is an anecdote, not a statistic. And for this one data point, there are probably a hundred counterexamples where the boss is some kind of dirt bag, but it doesn't affect his business.

      Show me a causation or at least a correlation and we can discuss. Otherwise, this smells badly of a) the idiotic american "war on drugs", b) an idiotic fascination with the CEO circus and c) an idiotic, continued smear campaign against Musk, who got so much flak the last time, he's either secretly Hitlers lost grandson or some stock market gamblers are trying to push the price down so they can pick it up cheaply.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  30. Re:missing the point blue ribbon winner by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    I bet you also stupidly and wrongly believe pot is completely harmless and has no negative effects on human health and well being.

    Do share your evidence for this statement.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  31. Didn't inhale! by basecastula+ · · Score: 1

    He didn't even Inhale. He puffed it like a cigar. He obviously doesnt smoke weed.

  32. This one is going to hurt by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I have no doubt that the DoD will be joining , or worse, doing their own. Many accusations against SX/musk have been claimed, and I would guess that nearly all were lies and dropped. BUT SX does not have the safety level of Boeing or NASA. This review will show that. The question will become, will NASA or more likely the DoD force SX to obtain that level.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:This one is going to hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the same Boeing that just had a plane crash itself into the ground killing all on board? Oh didn't we mention it might be physically impossible to pull up if the software decides it wants to take over? We must have forgot OOPS.

    2. Re:This one is going to hurt by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      BUT SX does not have the safety level of Boeing or NASA

      Hmm, having a hard time coming up with a list of lives lost as a result of SpaceX launches, to compare to the list of lives lost as a result of Boeing and/or NASA activities.

      So, would you share your list of Proof Positive That SpaceX is Unsafe items?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re:This one is going to hurt by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "BUT SX does not have the safety level of Boeing or NASA."

      You mean the company that built the space shuttles, and the organization that blew them up, in one case by deliberately exceeding temperature specifications of critical parts? Go on, pull the other one.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:This one is going to hurt by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      where did I say that they were unsafe? I said that they were NOT as safe as Boeing/NASA. I worked for Boeing. It goes a long ways due to lawyers as well as making sure that they will pick up NASA/DoD contracts.
      SpaceX does not cut corners as much as they meet the requirements as they see them. IOW, they will figure out the easy way to meet nasa's wording. For example, consider SX doing the pre-board to loading fuel. Boeing would NEVER do it because of the wording of NASA's. OTOH, SX has no issue with it.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:This one is going to hurt by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Having a high safety level does not mean that errors are not made, or that some ppl do not allow pressure to get to them.
      If SX was obeying 100% of NASA's safety rules, then they would not pre-board the crew PRIOR to the fuel. From NASA's POV, that is a big safety violation. It took more than half a year to convince NASA that it is safe (and yet, logic should have told them that it is MUCH safer).
      SX does not follow the letter of the regs, but the spirit of it. As such, they will have other areas that they have 'cut' corners and it will take time to convince NASA that it is safe.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:This one is going to hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you just admitted NASA's "safety rules" are not any safer and are just bullshit. Logic says SX's way is safer.

    7. Re:This one is going to hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take Xi's cock out of your mouth. Caffeinated/Crimson, you are a fucking idiot.

    8. Re:This one is going to hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'm thoroughly convinced you know what your talking about...

    9. Re:This one is going to hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just can't stop lying can you Windy. Just read some of your own posts to see where you said it fool.

  33. Re: missing the point blue ribbon winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you explain the Boring Company then?

  34. There IS NO LEGAL STATE, idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The state of California is within the United States of America.
    Using pot in the United States of America is a [federal] crime! DUH!

    The fact that a state, like California or Colorado, says that THE STATE will not prosecute you for the STATE crime of smoking a joint, means NOTHING - you are still comitting a federal crime.

    Geeze, people sure have become stupid about basic civics that used to be taught to 4th or 5th graders.

    Elon Musk has competitors at Boeing(Delta rockets), LockheedMartin(Atlas and Vulcan rockets), and NorthropGrumman(Antares and Pegasus rockets) who stand to lose BILLIONS of dollars in competition with SpaceX. It was a no-brainer that people associated with these interests would stir-up a hornet's nest if Musk did anything to give them the ammunition.... and Musk certainly did it. Elon Musk demonstrated astonishingly appallingly monumentally horrendous judgement by committing a federal crime ON VIDEO. Worse yet, the crime involved a mind-altering substance and Elon is in the aerospace industry where this sort of thing is considered a MAJOR safety risk. Companies building rockets are supposed to be drug-free workplaces with zero tolerance for any sloppyness because the field of endeavor they are in is extremely unforgiving. NASA is putting a fig leaf on this and making it appear fair and unbiased by also investigating Boeing (whose CEO will be found to have NOT smoked a doobie on video).

    Whether NASA likes Musk or not and whether his rockets work or not, this coult lead to serious problems getting funding and contracts for SpaceX rockets.

    Dumb. I certainly expected better of Musk. This was a really stupid f-up and a self-inflicted wound. Musk's best defense would be to claim that, as an immigrant, he did not fully register the idea that even though his host in California assured him it was legal, it was still in fact a criminal act.

    There is NO PLACE in the United States of America where pot use is legal. There are only a handful of states where the state no longer makes it a STATE crime.

    1. Re:There IS NO LEGAL STATE, idiot by easyTree · · Score: 1

      zero tolerance for any sloppyness .

      Agreed!

    2. Re:There IS NO LEGAL STATE, idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if off hours drug use contributes to safety issues, no one is allowed to drink alcohol off hours down at the rocket factory?

  35. and yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he had NOT smoked the joint, he'd have been more functional and one hell of a lot less stupid.

    While he'd not have been doing a criminal act if he had consumed a martini (or 3 or 6 or enough to slump over into a quivering droolin mess), he would have been showing a problem that might also have triggered an investigation. You may well be angry that getting drunk is legal but getting stoned is not, but that's the current state of the law, and one of the issues here now is judgement. Musk showed very bad judgement.

    Personally, I have little tolerance for drug users or drunks. I do neither [no, I am not a Morman or a Muslim]. I simply think its moronic to damage your own brain as a form of recreation. I'm not so obnoxiously narccissitic that I think I have so many brain cells that I can afford to destroy a bunch for fun. I similarly do not think I have so much money that I can afford to burn dollar bills in either of my fireplaces.

  36. no, but they do think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Musk is the charismatic and inspirational CEO of his company and that his employees probably take their cues for what behaviors are acceptable from him and his actions.

    The boss sets the tone for the team, and very tragically, there is now video of Mr Musk flaunting serious federal laws against the use of a mind-altering substance that, in addition to being illegal is also prohibited for workers in the aerospace industry. How does Musk legitimately fire a worker who is a pot head when he himself may be one??? Of, so are you now going to suggest he should not fire any of his rocket-building workers if he finds them smoking dope and making themselves stupid? Well, if that's the case then this is a real safety risk. Every time the taxpayers launch cargo on a SpaceX rocket they are risking hundreds of millions of dollars. Every launch of the soon-to-be-launched (if Musk can ween-off the late-night TacoBell runs) crewed Dragon will risk the lives of 2 to 6 federal government employees and possibly employees of allied governments whose travel plans were negotiated between governments by diplomats. That's a hell of a lot to risk on a team of people who may have drug problems and their bosss who seems to care little for federal safety standards and federal laws.

  37. total crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did he suck ANY molecules into his mouth or sinuses? Did he even SMELL it? (hint: he admits on the video that he did) These actions only happen when a person uses their lungs to inhale, creating the airflow that draws air/smoke into their nose and/or mouth. It's impossible to smell something without pulling molecules of it into your body and it's also impossible to get a buzz from pot without sucking some of it into your body.

    So, yes, HE DID F***ING INHALE!.

    Are you SERIOUSLY using the bullsh*t Bill Clinton defense on this? That did not work so well for Bill as nearly the entire nation rolled it's collective eyes and concluded that, although the economy was good at the time and Bill should not be removed from office, his word on everything and everything was suspect forever after. Admittedly, it did not help that the jerk went on to split hairs over the meaning of the word "is".

    [sigh] Potheads will say anything to justify their garbage - it's an impressive skill and it's too bad they cannot find a positive outlet for that creativity.

  38. Fishing expedition by easyTree · · Score: 1

    Maybe they can pick up some tips on how to be 10,000 times less wasteful of their resources?

  39. Re:missing the point blue ribbon winner by easyTree · · Score: 1

    So dumb. And yes, I want fries with that after you fill my tank.

    He's dumb? You're the one planning to eat 'food' from a gas station!?!?!?!

  40. What about sleep? by Evtim · · Score: 1

    Is NASA looking into that? Perhaps they should have looked into more of Joe's podcasts and found the one with Mathew Walker. 6 hours sleep equals legally drunk. Elon was complaining a bit about restlessness and lack of sleep. Those would be much bigger safety issues. Alas, weed helps you go to sleep but seems to disrupt dreaming so it's not great to substitute one problem for another....

    But hey, no one looks into sleep. In fact it is badge of honor to sleep less and "work more"....big time macho ignoramuses and iron ladies (Raegan and Thatcher)...as Walker said they both got Alzheimer's. Cheers!

    And what about alcohol? You gonna tell me that the old time astronauts weren't drinking? How did Andrew Weir put it in "the Martian"? "What would old time astronaut do? Take few shots of whiskey, bang his mistress and solve the problem."

    There is no way in hell that all the brouhaha about Elon's puff is not deliberate and therefore sleazily hypocritical. He really must be one of the greatest and most useful for humanity people on Earth if so many want to see him down. That's the times we live in - the more someone is attacked and smeared the greater people they are [e.g. Jordan Peterson].

    BTW, I though this was a property of the communist ideology (cause any disparity in outcome MUST be oppression and privilege) - when I was growing up I quickly learned not to display talent and excellence....but really, communism in America! Oh, wait! Oh, shit!

  41. Re:missing the point blue ribbon winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    NASA safety department doesnt give a shit if something else legal could be worse.

    No, but the senior NASA adminstrators know that SpaceX is making a monkey out of them, even to the point that NASA is forced to contract out flights to SpaceX. You don't think that sticks in these old-school political bureaucrats' craws? And all that sweet government money paid out to Musk instead of NASA and the old-guard aerospace contractors they've had a revolving-door, incestuous relationship with for decades isn't a factor?

    This is Musk's aerospace competition using the influence they have with NASA to attack Musk/SpaceX just like the auto industry uses their leverage within the government to attack Musk/Tesla.

    Follow the money. Who benefits? That's where the answers almost invariably always are in these sort of affairs.

  42. NASA's culture by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 0

    They hire astronauts who wear adult diapers so that they can drive from Houston to Florida without taking bathroom breaks to attack a fellow astronaut who is cheating on her with another astronaut.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  43. NASA should check themselves first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA's probing a safety culture is laughable at best. Safety has and is ignored when it's inconvenient. See the lost Space Shuttle missons and Apollo 1 as examples.

  44. NASA has paper trail culture not safety culture by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Richard Feynman describes an anecdote. He found that the solid rocket boosters have some 196 bolts around the rim and the bolt and the bolt holes at 12 o' clock and 6o' clock positions were marked. The workers count the holes to 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock positions to align the heavy booster segment hanging from a crane on a cable to assemble it. He casually added a note saying, they should mark the 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock bolts and holes to make the assembly easier without bumping and damaging the segments during the assembly.

    Three years later he got a stack of about four ring binders from the committee that followed up on his casual note. Skipping to the punch line, they concluded, "they can not mark them because updating the assembly and verification documentation would be too expensive".

    Is there any wonder, SpaceX runs circles around NASA when it comes to efficiency?

    Remember every dollar "wasted" by the government is a dollar earned by someone who did not deserve it. We know NASA wastes tons and tons of money. The defense contractors are getting it. That cash flow is getting threatened. They will retaliate like this.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:NASA has paper trail culture not safety culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you forget that NASA is the patron saint of SpaceX and that it took a large gamble on Elon with ISS resupply. NASA and SpaceX have had a very successful partnership which is pushing the envelope of development cycles and both are benefiting from each other. The media only exists today to stir the pot, to show conflict and to polarize. Realize that the Agency works closely with the SpaceX Engineers and that the processes are quite lean today.

      That said, Elon is in business because the US Government took a chance on him and as part of that like any other contractor, he's expected to be a rationale actor. Lately he's shown personality characteristics that are at a minimum a distraction. You can call NASA what you want and involve Feynman if you want, but the reality is if you want to deal with the Agency you have to show some decorum. It's great he launched his Tesla into space and everyone thinks that was awesome publicity, and the world needs people who push beyond the rules as he does, but you must admit that he crosses the line at times and one of those lines for someone receiving funds from the Government is to follow the rules. For you to denigrate the Agency leads such as BG who have given him every shot is simply grandstanding to get modded up.

      Remember, if astronauts were to die on DM-2, it's easy for you to say 'well people die in cars every day', but the reality is the system would lock down. The Pendulum is quite off-center right now in favor of fast development, and it's important to ensure the silicon valley (everyone is a beta tester) culture isn't too far off.

      Respectfully,

  45. Re: missing the point blue ribbon winner by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0

    I don't suspect that Elon Musk has ever designed anything in his life. He just renames old tech and pretends he invented it. Sounds like every other useless pot-head I know.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  46. Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tesla Motors is in the "Dirty Dozen" most dangerous employers to work for in the USA. Wouldn't be surprised if Musk was cutting corners on health and safety elsewhere. Since the USA has a shitty healthcare system where health is the leading cause of bankruptcy, you have to take workplace health and safety seriously.

  47. Alcohol isn't illegal according to federal laws. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alcohol isn't illegal according to federal laws.

    When I worked at JSC in the 1990s, my group, we didn't drink very much. Not at lunch, not after work, and only had parties 1-2 times a year. But half year or so, we'd have "team building exercises" which entailed having a long lunch at a local German restaurant on Hwy 3, discussions about our work, then we'd get lots of beer. If we planned correctly, the bosses boss was there so only 1 person would need to call back to the office about the half-day of vacation.
    After 1 of these team building exercises, I returned to my office to pick up some personal stuff and my car around 5pm only to find 2 FBI agents waiting inside by door. My first question to them was how did they get into a secure facility. Turned out I was someone's reference for their clearance. I'm fairly certain my file was updated that day as well. Out of 15 people on the team, only 2 entered the building that afternoon.

    As for smoking inside JSC blg 30, the Apollo FCR reeked of smoke from normal cigarettes. They smoked at their workstations for decades. However, it became a non-smoking building in the 1980s. You could see the controllers running for the door whenever the mission was out of contact for a smoke break.

  48. Pretty clever... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Slick way to disqualify a contractor without looking like you're playing favorites.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  49. NASA safety probe -- what a sad joke! by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

    NASA, you're hypocrites! You've killed 14 astronauts! How many has Musk killed?

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  50. so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the same losers that blew up the Space Shuttle in 1986 killed how many people, want a safety review because Musk smoked a joint...... ok.........

    Welcome to "Stupid Disease".

  51. Re:missing the point blue ribbon winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, what matters is that Congress has written mandatory drug testing into ALL government contracts since the Reagan, 'War on Drugs'.

    As a result of that, massive drug testing companies have arisen, who pay off the Congress-critters to ensure that the money keeps coming in.

    I GUARANTEE that is where the pressure is coming from on this issue

  52. NASA will abandon SLS if 'BFR' launches by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

    This 'controversy' has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that it is likely that NASA will likely cancel the Space Launch System if BFR or Blue Origin 'New Glen' are able to launch. Nothing at all. Nothing to see here. Move along.

    --
    This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
  53. Up to date by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Government investigation into alcohol use by bosses at NASA and in the U.S. Congress in T minus 10 trillion...

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  54. Re:missing the point blue ribbon winner by GonzoPhysicist · · Score: 1

    What really sucks is that we can't even do the research to find out if that's true or not.

    --
    horror vacui
  55. talk about wording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try again in English.

  56. Re: missing the point blue ribbon winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dave, my old roommate, did all the research we need.

    It turns you into a paranoid, lazy, low functioning fucking moron.

  57. Not paying attention? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever your position on alcohol is....it's COMPLETELY UNRELATED TO THIS INCIDENT. Musk comitted a federal crime, on camera.

    You can hate the fact that pot is illegal federally, you can love the fact that it's illegal federally, you can wish alcohol was banned and pot was freely distributed, or whatever .... it does not matter. The laws are what they currently are, and under the curent laws, Musk comitted a s federal crime, ON CAMERA.

    Stupid. Dumb. SUPER bad judgement.

    And, it turns out, NASA and the USAF and the NRO all sorta expece the people who design and build rockets that haul humans and/or billion dollar payloads into space to be..... well...... people with good judgement.

    It's really just that simple.

    The arguments that pot should be legal, or that pot is less of a problem than acohol, etc abelong someplace else - they avoid the problem at hand, which is that the laws are currently what they are and Musk [very stupidly] comitted a federal crime ON CAMERA.

    Do you get it yet?

  58. Re: missing the point blue ribbon winner by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    Dave, my old roommate, did all the research we need.

    It turns you into a paranoid, lazy, low functioning fucking moron.

    More than likely Dave had some emotional issues.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  59. Re:missing the point blue ribbon winner by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    What really sucks is that we can't even do the research to find out if that's true or not.

    Yeah, schedule 1 is a double bind for that.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.