Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk's Extracurricular Antics Reportedly Spark a NASA Safety Probe At SpaceX (techcrunch.com)

The recent interview Elon Musk conducted with Joe Rogan, where Musk took one puff from a marijuana cigarette after a lengthy conversation around AI, social media and space, is prompting a NASA safety probe at SpaceX. The Washington Post reports that NASA was not amused with Musk's antics and has "ordered a safety review of SpaceX and Boeing as a response to the colorful chief executive's shenanigans," reports TechCrunch. From the report: In an interview, NASA associate administrator for human exploration, William Gerstenmaier, told the Post that the review will begin next year and would examine the "safety culture" of both Boeing and SpaceX. Rather than focus on the safety of the actual rockets, the Post said that the review would look at the hours employees work, drug policies, leadership and management styles, and the responsiveness of both companies to safety concerns from employees. The review is going to be led by the Office of Safety and Mission Assurance within NASA, which has conducted similar probes before, according to the Post report.

According to the NASA official, the process could be "pretty invasive," with the potential for hundreds of interviews with employees at every level and across all locations where the companies operate. At stake is the potential $6.8 billion in contracts the two companies received in 2014 to revive crewed missions to space. SpaceX grabbed $2.6 billion from NASA for the program, while the remainder went to Boeing. In a statement given to the Post, SpaceX said, "We couldn't be more proud of all that we have already accomplished together with NASA, and we look forward to returning human spaceflight capabilities to the United States."

127 of 225 comments (clear)

  1. They take it seriously by AlanObject · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My last company was supporting boards for the aerospace industry. They have all sorts of odd triggers when it comes to anything to do with "drugs."

    For some reason we didn't have to drug test our line workers that produced the product, but we did have to certify that the people who repaired the product with audited drug tests. Well it turns out to be one guy in our whole company who had to pee in a cup. I offered to do it with him even though I had nothing to do with manufacturing because I thought that was unfair. But it never went anywhere.

    Elon can be hip as he wants, but if he wants those sweet sweet government contracts he has to behave. If something goes BOOM down the line when it wasn't supposed to there is nobody at NASA who wants to report to the subsequent investigation that they weren't keeping tabs on vendors.

    1. Re:They take it seriously by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      No they don't. Not unless they are using hair or check swab tests, which are expensive (also relatively expensive to cheat on).

      Pee tests are designed to let 'crete and paint crews stay staffed. If they worked, the crews would be empty and work wouldn't get done.

      I've passed pee tests while reeking, red eyed, dry mouthed, babbling, stoned.

      It's been decades since I took a pee test sober, kind of a ritual. Though at this point, it's been a few years since I took one at all.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If he smoked in a legal state and in a legal manner he was behaving. He doesn't operate heavy machinery. I don't see a problem.

    3. Re: They take it seriously by murdocj · · Score: 1

      You won't until something blows up.

    4. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please stop with the "Reefer Madness" bullshit and hysterics...

      He could have smoked the whole joint and he'd still be more functional that people who use "socially acceptable" drugs like rx narcotics and alcohol...

    5. Re: They take it seriously by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If he smoked in a legal state and in a legal manner he was behaving.

      Some states have legalized pot, but selling, using, and possession are still federal offenses.

      Musk is a CEO, not a high school student. He needs to grow up.

    6. Re:They take it seriously by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're forgetting about that time the TSA found an overdue library book in Musk's carryon. That and a joint is two strikes. One speeding ticket in a red Tesla, and federosaurus mandatory sentencing kicks in.

    7. Re: They take it seriously by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Something blew up *before* he smoked it, so clearly the explosions cause the smoking.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re: They take it seriously by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      He simply should move his headquarter to Europe ... find a nice launch site on the many euqatorial islands or use ESA's site in French Guayana.

      I don't know how much infrastructure as in roads/rails he actually needs, but I could imagine he can find an island that has everything for him, including tropical storms.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    9. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Musk is an idiot, but that doesn't excuse the church lady prudes initiating this witch hunt. I doubt that the NASA church ladies would have gotten their panties in a knot if Musk had been swigging from a glass of scotch

    10. Re:They take it seriously by fafalone · · Score: 1

      It's just so stupid for an industry full of ostensibly smart people to test for whether someone has used pot in the last month but not test at all for alcohol, which impairs you a lot more than the weed you smoked last week. Not to mention all the other illegal drugs that are out of your system in a few days.

    11. Re: They take it seriously by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

      "Musk is a CEO, not a high school student. He needs to grow up."

      Oh really bill? Well how many CEOs have a whiskey or a beer on camera and no one fucking cares.

      Tell me why its not the same fucking thing. Its ludicrous. Your corporate america is fucking stupid as always. Ain't no reason for weed stigma. Clinging to childish stereotypes is a fear reflex. What happened to the nasa that fearlessly lead the race to the moon? Bloated and tired like your orange flavoured leader.

      --
      -
    12. Re: They take it seriously by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Well how many CEOs have a whiskey or a beer on camera and no one fucking cares.

      Tell me why its not the same fucking thing.

      The difference is that one is a federal crime.

      That doesn't matter much to a high school student, since the feds rarely go after end users. But for the CEO of a multi-billion dollar corporation, acting like an adult is more important.

    13. Re: They take it seriously by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      WTF does SpaceX's safety have to do with Musk's state of mind? He has almost nothing to do with day-to-day operations.

      This is political payback for something we haven't seen. Some senator is pissed with him, probably for something personal.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:They take it seriously by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      Wankers would employ flat earthers though, so it is just virtue signalling.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    15. Re: They take it seriously by MrKaos · · Score: 5, Informative

      If he smoked in a legal state and in a legal manner he was behaving.

      Some states have legalized pot, but selling, using, and possession are still federal offenses.

      The Federal government has several very public incidences of where it has broken *it's own* laws. Enough of the population use Cannabis to suggest that Federal law on this subject is about as antiquated as alcohol prohibition, it's beyond time to end it in all western countries.

      Musk is a CEO, not a high school student. He needs to grow up.

      I think that the real issue is that Musk has quite effectively shown that people's attitude towards cannabis needs to mature. So if we are going to have a grown up conversation it is reasonable to point out that both Tobacco and alcohol kill you (eventually) when used as directed.

      Not that I mind a beer, however that should be the attitude towards Cannabis. No one ever gets into a tizzy about someone having a beer, you can even drive after one or two.

      If we were having a really grown-up conversation we would be discussing how the prison guard union lobbies against ending its prohibition because it allows prison populations to be sustained so that they stay in work. Same with the Prison companies who want a cheap controllable work force constantly available.

      Alcohol lobbyists are against ending cannabis prohibition because sales will go down, obviously, once people find out they can get wasted without having a hangover.

      Rayon corporation are against ending cannabis prohibition because sales of artificial thread will go down.

      There's more, these are the lobby points I remember off hand.

      However the best one, if anyone remembers Citizen Kane, is a story loosely based on William Randolph Hearst who worked very hard to criminalize cannabis so that he would not have to bare the costs of replacing his printing presses around the US when paper manufacturers found that paper made from cannabis was cheaper to make and a better product than wood pulp paper. IIRC it also requires less chlorine to produce hemp paper, so perhaps a grown-up conversation about cannabis could include the damage to the environment its prohibition has indirectly caused.

      In a way Musk has subtly shown that he isn't "that guy".

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    16. Re: They take it seriously by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      The difference is that one is a federal crime.

      The smart people at NASA should be able to look beyond the black/white legal issues, and focus on the real dangers. In that case, there's no practical difference between weed and whiskey.

    17. Re: They take it seriously by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Not just NASA, but DoD, cia, nsa, etc take this seriously.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    18. Re: They take it seriously by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 1

      If he smoked in a legal state and in a legal manner he was behaving. He doesn't operate heavy machinery. I don't see a problem.

      The problem is that it is still a schedule 1 drug by the "federal" government no matter what the "state" government says. And since NASA has to suck the fed's tit then it has to hard line to keep the fed money rolling.

      One day, when all the old white Nixon time pieces of shit retire or die off and younger peeps take their places, we might actually see some much needed reforms to this fucking stupid war on drugs bullshit and be able to use those funds to help fight wars that matter like domestic violence or homelessness or PTSD or the insane cost of health coverage or the insane amount of education debt, or, or, or. Anyway, what were we talking about?

    19. Re: They take it seriously by easyTree · · Score: 1

      What happened to the nasa that fearlessly lead the race to the moon?

      They're locked in basement room 58. The rest of the building is allocated to political contributions and red tape.

    20. Re: They take it seriously by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Musk is a CEO, not a high school student. He needs to grow up.

      I encourage you to actually watch the interview in question. Not only the part where he smokes pot but also the part where they discuss it a bit later. You'll find that he is far more grown up than those people who like to jump to conclusions based on soundbites and news headlines.

    21. Re: They take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      God damn that's that dumbest shit I've read today.

    22. Re: They take it seriously by Spamalope · · Score: 2

      You misspelled 'wealthy gov't contractors who don't want their feeding trough upset'.

    23. Re: They take it seriously by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      NASA is a federal agency, so from their perspective there is no such thing as a legal state. Don't get me wrong. The whole thing is phenomenally stupid. If you watch the footage Musk is quite explicit about his not smoking weed and why. On top of that unless they insist on complete abstinence from alcohol they already allow use of one of the most dangerous drugs on the planet.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    24. Re: They take it seriously by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Because he failed to tighten a valve? Because he left a dab of oil in LOX line? Because he missed a comma in control software? Because he made a mistake in the calculations? Oh, wait, he doesn't do any of these things. He's a fucking CEO. The worst his activity can blow up is the stock prices.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    25. Re: They take it seriously by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      SpaceX is not on the stock market. And Elon has contemplated taking Tesla off the stock market because apparently he felt it was holding them back by always forcing them to look at the short term.

      As for recycling 100 year old technology: why haven't Boeing, Lockheed and the others done reusable rockets then, instead of wasting billions of dollars making expensive non-reusable rockets that are four times as expensive as even a non-reused Falcon 9? After all, it's not like this is brand new and exciting technology, they could have done so ages ago. With all the money NASA would have saved, they could have been on Mars by now. So why haven't they?

      Or maybe the technology wasn't quite so simple and they all thought it was impossible.

    26. Re: They take it seriously by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Actually, he was also drinking quite a lot of whiskey during that interview. Few people seemed to mind, though.

    27. Re: They take it seriously by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Neither. It was expensive, but the concept existed just fine in 1915.

      Big Dumb Throwaway rockets were CHEAPER was the reason governments did it that way.

      Same with the pneumatic subway (hyperloop), the electric car (had those in the early days, but gasoline beat out batteries back then for energy density), and everything else Musk supposedly "invents".

      Don't buy into the hype machine.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    28. Re: They take it seriously by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Inventing is not just about having a concept like "maybe we can let a rocket land on its tail". It's also about actually making it work. Even the latest rocket being designed by NASA today, the SLS, is an expensive throwaway rocket. So what's the reason today?

      Your advice to innovators seems to be "stop innovating, because you're just pretend engineers that are recycling old ideas". Fortunately, the actual innovators aren't listening to you and are actually pushing human society forward.

      Have you ever invented anything?

    29. Re: They take it seriously by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      True that.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  2. What is wrong with these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    NASA is spending American tax dollars to investigate a company's employees' off hours activities - based on the CEO participating in a legal activity; at least in California.

    What a waste. No wonder NASA can't get a man to the moon anymore.

    1. Re: What is wrong with these people? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Sadly, the Fed-scum still keep it illegal at their level...

    2. Re: What is wrong with these people? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Trump is high on his own Alzheimer's...

    3. Re:What is wrong with these people? by Shaitan · · Score: 2

      NASA is federal, it isn't legal anywhere as far as the feds are concerned.

    4. Re:What is wrong with these people? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Even feds can't find juries to convict and they know it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:What is wrong with these people? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You can hang a jury, but you can't convict.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:What is wrong with these people? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Troll-boy doesn't realize that the death penalty isn't an option for the jury in those cases, unless he's from Iran or Saudi Arabia (which may not have jury trials anyway).

    7. Re:What is wrong with these people? by sunking2 · · Score: 2

      Let's take a look at the last Soyuz. A simple manufacturing issue. This is why random drug and alcohol tests are tied to an entire contract, whether you work in the office on the program or in manufacturing. Not saying this was the cause of the soyuz, but the job of NASA is to reduce risk when dealing with programs costs in the millions and ultimately billions.

    8. Re:What is wrong with these people? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      I will convict any fucking pot smoker to the death penalty.

      By stoning?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:What is wrong with these people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      No! By letting him smoke a lethal dose!!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    10. Re:What is wrong with these people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First of all: the drugs I take at time out of work, usually don't affect my work, as I sleep about 8h before I go to work. So, assuming a worker had made a mistake which causes a defect, under drugs, is obviously not very plausible.
      Secondly, to let a defect escape into production says that there is something wrong with the process. Regardless if the "cause" was a person under drugs. Perhaps all people in the chain of the process are under drugs?
      Thirdly: consuming drugs at work, or working under influence of mind or body altering drugs obviously should be prohibited. No one likes a drunk plane pilot ... But where do you draw the line? Is coffee a drug? What about pain killers? It is not even a decade ago that it was common that vending machines inside of big companies sold beer to the staff (in Germany) ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    11. Re:What is wrong with these people? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Is coffee a drug?

      Yes, a performance enhancing one.

      What about pain killers?

      Obviously. But really what you're showing here is quite a bit of ignorance on the topic. "Drugs" aren't banned, rather quite specific drugs that have quite specific performance related effects are banned. And yes there are several pain killers that would show up on my drug screen on the way into work which would result in me being either not allowed either on site or being banned from undertaking certain activities.

    12. Re:What is wrong with these people? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Trials by jury are considered archaic and primitive by most states of law.

      Things America values and you've spoken out against:
      * Soap box
      * Ballot box
      * Jury Box
      * Ammo box

      We think we're more important than our government. You disagree, I get it.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:What is wrong with these people? by coofercat · · Score: 1

      ...and yet withdrawal from coffee (caffeine) is most definitely something that could impact your ability to do your job. There's a discussion about the soyuz production line above, and maybe someone with too little caffeine one day tightened a bolt to the wrong torque.

      There are more things than drugs that can affect your performance. There's usually a system of double-checks to make sure one persons performance isn't critical in the creation of anything important. Thus, Musk or anyone else's performance isn't really relevant - the process for risk mitigation might be, but that's not really being called into question here.

      If I had to guess, I'd call this a 'shake down'. Some powerful people have used a slightly controversial public act against the company for their own ends. As 'wrong' as it might be for such a thing to take place, it was arguably naive of Musk to give them such an opportunity.

    14. Re:What is wrong with these people? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Nothing is wrong insofar as the probe is concerned. They are just doing their jobs, they have done those probes before, and Boeing is getting the full treatment as well. The actual reason probably had more to do with the recent mishap with Soyuz. Stating that this is because of Musk having one single toke (the article summary amazingly getting that part right for a change) and a sip of liquor is 100% political PR bullshit. Either someone has an axe to grind with Musk, or some Puritan exec somewhere in the pecking order got his panties in a bunch.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    15. Re:What is wrong with these people? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Obviously. But really what you're showing here is quite a bit of ignorance on the topic. "Drugs" aren't banned, rather quite specific drugs that have quite specific performance related effects are banned. And yes there are several pain killers that would show up on my drug screen on the way into work which would result in me being either not allowed either on site or being banned from undertaking certain activities.

      Opiates can have zero effect on your performance or reaction times, it would depend entirely on your dosage and tolerance. Cannabis has no performance or neurological effect that would increase or decrease performance, reaction times or safety anymore than cigarettes would.

      The problem is that outside alcohol there has been almost no research on any of the other drugs that would conclusively prove impairment. And that's the exact problem, they were declared bad and added to a list without any scientific effort to validate that it could impair the user and at what dosage that impairment occurs. People that support the war on drugs and federal blanket bans on them generally have been told these lies their entire life and have no idea that none of this has ever been researched.

      Anything labeled Schedule 1 can't even be researched without permission by the DEA and you think the guys getting paid to ban drugs are going to allow research into the drugs that might prove they are harmless?

    16. Re:What is wrong with these people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I never spoke against a soap box, unless it is empty, that would be a shame, or a ballot box.
      However the voting system of the US is also so archaic that we outsiders laugh about it, or sometimes feel symphatic with the crowd that regularly gets excluded from voting.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    17. Re:What is wrong with these people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The problem is that people are mixing up drug usage as in consumption with drug abuse.

      If someone cares that someone else took MDH during a rave party at the last weekend then the former, not the later has a mental problem. Luckily drug tests are illegal in Europe and can only be done under court order or in military like environments, otherwise our economy would probably break down completely. (I don't even want to look to scandinavia)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    18. Re:What is wrong with these people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Cannabis has no performance or neurological effect that would increase or decrease performance, reaction times or safety anymore than cigarettes would.
      Of course it has. Cannabis can have extremely high effects. But as always: it depends on the dose, or dose over time. Most people don't consume enough to have negative effects or drawbacks, but you see enough people in areas where cannabis consumption in public is tolerated that are heavily affected.

      People that support the war on drugs and federal blanket bans on them generally have been told these lies their entire life and have no idea that none of this has ever been researched.
      Research on drugs is a big thing in Switzerland. Many doctors give up their jobs e.g. in Europe to work in Switzerland in research projects or simply in hospitals were treatment with e.g. LSD is allowed.

      allow research into the drugs that might prove they are harmless? Consumed with sense, most drugs are close to harmless, like alcohol. However the fact that they are illegal makes same expensive. The fact that they are expensive makes the producers mix them with other things, to thin them out. Not knowing the concentration of the drug in the final mixture makes them unsafe to use, and the stuff mixed in might be dangerous. Once there was a case where a pusher/dealer mixed in rat poison. The fact that they are unsafe and expensive goes on the health of the consumers. Being unhealthy is one of the parts leading to addiction. Addiction is often not caused by the drug itself but the mixed in stuff, e.g. pain killers. And from here the vicious circle of crime to get the money to get the drug starts.

      All that would be avoided if you simply could get your cannabis, heroine and cocaine at the next pharmacy, at a reasonable price, taxed like tobacco.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    19. Re:What is wrong with these people? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      ...and yet withdrawal from coffee (caffeine) is most definitely something that could impact your ability to do your job.

      Withdrawal from anything you're addicted to would, including doing non-drug related things like addictions to masturbation or addictive drugs that have no actual performance impact on the body like nicotine, or simply a change in diet can induce withdrawal symptoms as well.

      Side note: I called in sick for 2 days when I quit caffeine.

      The answer is not to focus on drugs in that case but rather the process of withdrawals. Your brain is fully of funky shit that could impact your performance, but it's silly to combine these all under one banner.

    20. Re:What is wrong with these people? by lgw · · Score: 1

      You've never advocated banning hate speech? I forget your exact position on the Brexit vote, but tell me how much you object to the EU's approach of just having nations vote on the same initiative every couple of years until "the voters finally get it right".

      or sometimes feel symphatic with the crowd that regularly gets excluded from voting.

      I'm also sympathetic to illegal Mexicans, but they should certainly be excluded from voting in the US.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    21. Re:What is wrong with these people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I forget your exact position on the Brexit vote
      The BREXIT will be a disaster (it actually is already) for the UK. That is my only opinion. I would have loved to work a year or two there ... so lets see how they manage work permits etc. after the BREXIT. If I need special work permits it is not worth the hassle.

      but tell me how much you object to the EU's approach of just having nations vote on the same initiative every couple of years until "the voters finally get it right".
      The EU does not have this approach. Then again, UK will probably vote about the BREXIT again.

      I'm also sympathetic to illegal Mexicans, but they should certainly be excluded from voting in the US.
      Sure. And what about the many legal americans who are blocked from voting every year?

      E.g. requiring a week before the midterms that in some states all native americans living in reservations need a street address and house number to be allowed to vote? In some reservations they ran around night and day to set up street signs and hand out house numbers to parcels of land that never had such things.

      A girl I know wrote a 2 pages rant about what happened in the USA last months attempting to block millions of voters from being able to vote. Perhaps I can copy it here.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    22. Re:What is wrong with these people? by lgw · · Score: 1

      "Millions of voters" is propaganda. Dozens of voters is reality.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    23. Re:What is wrong with these people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Lol,
      a single indian reservation with a million inhabitants is: millions of voters. Even if it is only 0.5 million who have voting rights. Granted, there wont be many like that, and I don't know how big the particular one she mentioned is. The estimation is that up to 20 million voters got hurdles thrown there way to prevent them from voting. No idea if that is true, but my friend gave me a huge list of incidents and that surely is more than one million cases.
      Anyway, she posted it on facebook, and I have to search it ... and I'm at the moment not in the mood ... but if you are interested I do it next days. (It is a long post).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  3. This is payback for .. by najajomo · · Score: 1, Troll

    This is payback for him not letting the vulture investors continually short the company.
    --

    Incidentally, don't you think ten mentions of Microsoft on the front page is a little much, even for the Microsoft slashdot.

    1. Re:This is payback for .. by bug_hunter · · Score: 1

      Are you sure NASA safety protocols are at the mercy of the wants of vulture investors?

      --
      It's turtles all the way down.
  4. Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    In 20 years taking a toke will be like opening a beer. Musk has gotten to where he is because he not only takes risks, he spends a lot of time and effort reducing them.

    So, you gonna compare Elon with the risk takers who said "don't launch" in 1986, or the risk takers who said "launch".

    1. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Why should patients care if their doctor smokes weed outside of working and on-call hours? Probably safer than them being a drunk or opioid addict.

    2. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You should see how the old men and ladies take to weed, once it's legal.

      'Old' generally comes with pain.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      If your doctor smokes anything you need to find a new one. Inhaling smoke is not a good idea.

    4. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Frankly, it's his/her body, and what they do with it off the clock is none of my fucking business. If they know the risks, I don't see this as worse than a doctor who rock climbs or races motorcycles as a hobby.

    5. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Many competent and intelligent people use pot and other drugs. One doesn't preclude the other.

    6. Re: Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Dins · · Score: 1

      Your anti-cannabis attitude, whether troll or not, is in the minority here. Both at /. and in the United States as a whole. in the United States as a whole.

    7. Re: Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Dins · · Score: 1

      oops. I fail at HTML...

    8. Re:Gee, who they gonna compare him to? by Dins · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm a Gen-Xer and my parents were always VERY against drugs of any sort. Then later in life (late 70s, early 80s), my mom got cancer. My dad actually bought her some weed from a waitress they knew at a restaurant they frequented.

      Unfortunately, he baked it into something and she definitely did NOT enjoy the edible experience. I wish they had talked to me about it before this happened instead of after. For the record, they lived in Arizona, and I'm in Wisconsin.

  5. Puritanical party poopers... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Typical of the US at large.. partaking in pleasurable activities leads to blacklisting. I don't like Musk for his Tesla spare parts policies and other reasons, but this is just abusive and stupid.

  6. Re:NASA is irrelevantly corrupt by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Boeing knows that hair testing their crew would be very ungood for them.

    This is the feds smacking ol' Musky on the nose with a newspaper for stepping out of line. The last of the drug warriors haven't died off, but are butthurt as fuck.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  7. Re: no by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    SpaceX has done what NASA and Boeing have been unable to do. The "fuck it" culture works, apparently.

  8. This could be a big deal by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    Any major contractor for Orion receives a random drug test. If you fail you can no longer work on the program until you go through a rehab period. The testing includes alcohol, pot, opiodes, etc. This is actually a pretty big concern now for the likes of Lockheed as they are outside of Denver. While a Drs prescription will get you out of it for your painkillers they don't give a rats ass for any medical marijuana card. I actually have to be very careful if for example I'm paired up on a ski lift with someone who decides to toke it up.

    1. Re:This could be a big deal by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The tests can't tell pot from Marinol (or it's other brand name).

      Works for DOT and FAA tests. Drs are much more relaxed and informed about these drugs vs 20 years ago.

      The standard pee test can be beat by a highschool dropout. But for the nervous (or owners of high stakes licences), Marinol does the trick.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:This could be a big deal by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Their drug tests can't distinguish between levels of THC metabolites from second-hand smoke and levels of THC actually likely to get someone high. Welcome to Dumberica, I guess, land of the Puritans, home of the zealots.

    3. Re:This could be a big deal by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that *it is a violation of Federal law*, and is also a violation of Federal Acquisition Regulations. The states can play like it is legal but the supremacy clause definitely applies, and if you violate federal law while working under a federal contract, you *will* have consequences, period.

    4. Re:This could be a big deal by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      By drug tests? By drug tests that cost less than $100?

      The answer on the ground is 'no', might change, but doubtful.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  9. Re: NASA is irrelevantly corrupt by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Hopefully, most will be in nursing homes in the next decade or so, though...

  10. Good idea by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's a good idea, because Musk has a joystick that he uses to remotely pilot each launched rocket, and must always have his wits about him to insure that the rockets don't crash and burn. Sorry, but this is just a bit ridiculous on NASA's part.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Good idea by murdocj · · Score: 1

      No, he's merely the guy who sets the tone and makes the decisions. Kinda nice if that guy isn't crazy or stoned when human lives are at stake.

    2. Re:Good idea by apoc.famine · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You realize he took a puff, didn't like it, and said he never gets high, don't you? That's what makes this entire thing a stupid farce. Prior to his Joe Rogan appearance, I generally assumed he was a major stoner, due to the crazy shit he comes up with. That's where we learned that he wasn't.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    3. Re:Good idea by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Seems pretty unlikely to be the case. If you bothered to watch the interview this whole tempest in a tea pot stems from, it doesn't seem like he's much into smoking pot. He seems genuinely surprised when Rogan lights up spliff and asks if it's a cigar, isn't sure whether it's legal or not, and then takes a tiny drag that he doesn't seem to inhale.

      Possibly still crazy, but not likely to be a stoner.

    4. Re:Good idea by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The WaPo article this is based on doesn't directly link Musk's behaviour to the investigation, which is also looking a Boeing.

      https://www.washingtonpost.com...

      Seems like they are just doing their due diligence and checking out both the companies that will be putting humans in space for them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Good idea by c · · Score: 1

      I'm strongly suspecting that this is just a convenient excuse to do something NASA was already planning on doing.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    6. Re:Good idea by aicrules · · Score: 1

      And moreso, he also pilots Boeing's rockets. Because why else would a Boeing security review also be triggered? Oh wait maybe it's just a random abuse of power that someone wanted an excuse to run up an expense account.

  11. Ridiculous by Shaitan · · Score: 1

    Absolutely ridiculous. Even this language is so outdated as to be absurd "a marijuana cigarette."

    So NASA no longer cares about the quality of the actual output of SpaceX, now they are all about policing the off-hours behavior of a contractors employees?

    Literally every old timer in management and administration who embraces this sort of philosophy needs to be given the boot. Call it early retirement. If they are this backwards and antiquated on topics like this it's no wonder they are so slow and antiquated on their methodologies in other areas.

  12. Joint Venture by mentil · · Score: 1

    Anyone notice how SpaceX rockets look like giant joints, smoking their way off into the cosmos? Coincidence?!

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Joint Venture by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      What strain are you smoking? Cause I'm growing it, next year!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Joint Venture by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Anyone notice how SpaceX rockets look like giant joints, smoking their way off into the cosmos? Coincidence?!

      That's SpaceX should develop a "Rocket Bong", sales would be huge.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  13. Alcohol anyone? by george14215 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why doesn't NASA open an investigation into itself to figure out who drinks alcohol...a more potent and dangerous drug.

    1. Re:Alcohol anyone? by quenda · · Score: 3, Funny

      Archival photo of the NASA drug enforcement team:

      https://www.hq.nasa.gov/pao/Hi...

    2. Re:Alcohol anyone? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      I always found it hilarious that no one in the movie "Hidden Figures" was shown smoking, when in reality the whole crew would have been puffing like old steam engines.

    3. Re:Alcohol anyone? by quenda · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I always found it hilarious that no one in the movie "Hidden Figures" was shown smoking, when in reality the whole crew would have been puffing like old steam engines.

      Probably not in mission control though. The only photos I saw of smoking there were the after-mission cigars.

      And "Hidden Figures" cares little for facts. They show gender and racial segregation at NASA that did not exist. OK, there were was a little bit:
      "Katherine (then Goble) was originally unaware that the East Side bathrooms were segregated, and used the unlabeled "whites-only" bathrooms for years before anyone complained.[19] She ignored the complaint, and the issue was dropped."
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    4. Re:Alcohol anyone? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      And "Hidden Figures" cares little for facts.

      They made a conscious decision to incorporate some elements from wider society at the time, and to dramatise events to help convey the character's feelings and struggles. Voice-over internal monologues don't work so well on film.

      That's fairly standard stuff with historical dramas. The goal is not really to give you an accurate history lesson, it's to help you understand the wider issues and the context of the time, to generate empathy and to provide some entertainment.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Alcohol anyone? by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      Parent is right. 60% of men smoked in the Apollo Era. Even the submarines had ashtrays.

    6. Re:Alcohol anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know what? I'm sick of those excuses.

      Those putting these crap "dramas" out there in front of people in the name of profit should be punished for betraying the foundations of our society, not summarily excused by "it's entertainment". Ultimately it doesn't matter what you call it; It's a false version of historical events, and it still shapes peoples perception - in some cases you could even argue that it indoctrinates them. This is how we end up with retarded Americans who think they saved Europe from the Nazis in 1918, when they in actuality where Johnny-come-lately, and only there to save the bacon of the New York bankers who couldn't afford a British defeat, rather than actually being the indirect cause of them in the first place.

  14. Re:NASA is irrelevantly corrupt by murdocj · · Score: 1

    What are you on?

  15. Drug Policies? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    How is that even a part of the criteria? If everyone is wondering around stoned all day and still achieving their objectives safely (not that I suspect that to be the case) it should be a point in favor of open drug policies, not a point against the safety measured through an objective lens.

  16. I can see where they are coming from, but... by rnmartinez · · Score: 1

    this does seem a bit extreme. Probably more of a "where there's smoke, there's fire" precaution - maybe they think that everyone is smoking up and that's OK, but it seems like an extreme overreaction. Also seems like poor due diligence - if Elon hadn't lit up a joint, then they would just assume that everything is OK, even if the production line is stoned 24x7? To me, if SpaceX/Beoing/etc... are going to be responsible for restoring space flight to the U.S., this should have happened upfront, regardless of what happens in the public eye or not.

    1. Re:I can see where they are coming from, but... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      If the CEO is smoking up in public, it tells his workers that it's okay. So, they want to make sure it's not allowed at work.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:I can see where they are coming from, but... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      The workers are smart enough to work at SpaceX. They already know it is OK.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  17. Musk just sell everything for scrap by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    Say "fuck it", scrap everything in spacex. Show the government what a loss to humanity a mind like yours would be.

    --
    [($)]
  18. Mechanic? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    Do they think Musk is turning wrenches? Installing fasteners on his launchers? What the f*ck is wrong at NASA?

  19. Rope that pony! by seoras · · Score: 4, Insightful

    SpaceX is so far ahead with recycling rockets (= lower launch cost & better margins) that the incumbent rocket contractors appear to have pulled some strings to attempt to slow them down or discount them from the running. Someone needs breathing space to catch up.

    In a better world you'd spend 100% of your time focusing on innovating and improving technology instead of wasting time fighting the status quo.

    1. Re:Rope that pony! by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      SpaceX is so far ahead with recycling rockets (= lower launch cost & better margins) that the incumbent rocket contractors appear to have pulled some strings to attempt to slow them down or discount them from the running. Someone needs breathing space to catch up.

      That sounds exactly right. "Oh we're auditing Boeing too!" Yeah, with 1/10th as many requests for interviews and documentation.

      Did anybody notice the weasel-wording of the contract values?

      SpaceX grabbed $2.6 billion from NASA for the program, while the remainder went to Boeing.

      Sounds so much better than "Boeing got $1.6 billion more than SpaceX to do the same job SpaceX is doing, only slower."

  20. Mellow fellow by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Elon: "Relaaax, it's not like we're doing rocket science here."

  21. applied logic by Tom · · Score: 2

    Because Musk is personally building and piloting those things. Right. Makes sense.

    This american fascination with colourful CEOs has gone too far. What more does it take for you guys to understand that it's all a circus? Who cares? Sure CEOs matter, but not half as much as a good engineering team.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:applied logic by Tom · · Score: 1

      He is the boss, he says how things are going to run so you cannot always ignore his antics

      Really? Why not? Can you prove any effect whatsoever of my bosses drug habits on me?

      I remember an extreme case of a business owner being barred from interfering in the day to day operations of his own restaurants, he was the root cause of repeated food safety issues despite never touching anything himself.

      One data point is an anecdote, not a statistic. And for this one data point, there are probably a hundred counterexamples where the boss is some kind of dirt bag, but it doesn't affect his business.

      Show me a causation or at least a correlation and we can discuss. Otherwise, this smells badly of a) the idiotic american "war on drugs", b) an idiotic fascination with the CEO circus and c) an idiotic, continued smear campaign against Musk, who got so much flak the last time, he's either secretly Hitlers lost grandson or some stock market gamblers are trying to push the price down so they can pick it up cheaply.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  22. Re:Federal Laws matter for Federal Contracts by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    The people paying the bills get to set the rules.

    Considering the state of lobbying in the US, never has a truer sentence been said.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  23. Re:Safety Probe! by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    "Safety Probe!" I shouted as I rammed the rocket shaped dildo deeper and deeper

    At NASA it's actually called a Auditing Nasa's Alimentary Limitation Probe and from what I heard it can be quite intrusive.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  24. Re:missing the point blue ribbon winner by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    I bet you also stupidly and wrongly believe pot is completely harmless and has no negative effects on human health and well being.

    Do share your evidence for this statement.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  25. Didn't inhale! by basecastula+ · · Score: 1

    He didn't even Inhale. He puffed it like a cigar. He obviously doesnt smoke weed.

  26. This one is going to hurt by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I have no doubt that the DoD will be joining , or worse, doing their own. Many accusations against SX/musk have been claimed, and I would guess that nearly all were lies and dropped. BUT SX does not have the safety level of Boeing or NASA. This review will show that. The question will become, will NASA or more likely the DoD force SX to obtain that level.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:This one is going to hurt by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      BUT SX does not have the safety level of Boeing or NASA

      Hmm, having a hard time coming up with a list of lives lost as a result of SpaceX launches, to compare to the list of lives lost as a result of Boeing and/or NASA activities.

      So, would you share your list of Proof Positive That SpaceX is Unsafe items?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:This one is going to hurt by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "BUT SX does not have the safety level of Boeing or NASA."

      You mean the company that built the space shuttles, and the organization that blew them up, in one case by deliberately exceeding temperature specifications of critical parts? Go on, pull the other one.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:This one is going to hurt by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      where did I say that they were unsafe? I said that they were NOT as safe as Boeing/NASA. I worked for Boeing. It goes a long ways due to lawyers as well as making sure that they will pick up NASA/DoD contracts.
      SpaceX does not cut corners as much as they meet the requirements as they see them. IOW, they will figure out the easy way to meet nasa's wording. For example, consider SX doing the pre-board to loading fuel. Boeing would NEVER do it because of the wording of NASA's. OTOH, SX has no issue with it.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:This one is going to hurt by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Having a high safety level does not mean that errors are not made, or that some ppl do not allow pressure to get to them.
      If SX was obeying 100% of NASA's safety rules, then they would not pre-board the crew PRIOR to the fuel. From NASA's POV, that is a big safety violation. It took more than half a year to convince NASA that it is safe (and yet, logic should have told them that it is MUCH safer).
      SX does not follow the letter of the regs, but the spirit of it. As such, they will have other areas that they have 'cut' corners and it will take time to convince NASA that it is safe.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  27. There IS NO LEGAL STATE, idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The state of California is within the United States of America.
    Using pot in the United States of America is a [federal] crime! DUH!

    The fact that a state, like California or Colorado, says that THE STATE will not prosecute you for the STATE crime of smoking a joint, means NOTHING - you are still comitting a federal crime.

    Geeze, people sure have become stupid about basic civics that used to be taught to 4th or 5th graders.

    Elon Musk has competitors at Boeing(Delta rockets), LockheedMartin(Atlas and Vulcan rockets), and NorthropGrumman(Antares and Pegasus rockets) who stand to lose BILLIONS of dollars in competition with SpaceX. It was a no-brainer that people associated with these interests would stir-up a hornet's nest if Musk did anything to give them the ammunition.... and Musk certainly did it. Elon Musk demonstrated astonishingly appallingly monumentally horrendous judgement by committing a federal crime ON VIDEO. Worse yet, the crime involved a mind-altering substance and Elon is in the aerospace industry where this sort of thing is considered a MAJOR safety risk. Companies building rockets are supposed to be drug-free workplaces with zero tolerance for any sloppyness because the field of endeavor they are in is extremely unforgiving. NASA is putting a fig leaf on this and making it appear fair and unbiased by also investigating Boeing (whose CEO will be found to have NOT smoked a doobie on video).

    Whether NASA likes Musk or not and whether his rockets work or not, this coult lead to serious problems getting funding and contracts for SpaceX rockets.

    Dumb. I certainly expected better of Musk. This was a really stupid f-up and a self-inflicted wound. Musk's best defense would be to claim that, as an immigrant, he did not fully register the idea that even though his host in California assured him it was legal, it was still in fact a criminal act.

    There is NO PLACE in the United States of America where pot use is legal. There are only a handful of states where the state no longer makes it a STATE crime.

    1. Re:There IS NO LEGAL STATE, idiot by easyTree · · Score: 1

      zero tolerance for any sloppyness .

      Agreed!

  28. Fishing expedition by easyTree · · Score: 1

    Maybe they can pick up some tips on how to be 10,000 times less wasteful of their resources?

  29. Re:missing the point blue ribbon winner by easyTree · · Score: 1

    So dumb. And yes, I want fries with that after you fill my tank.

    He's dumb? You're the one planning to eat 'food' from a gas station!?!?!?!

  30. What about sleep? by Evtim · · Score: 1

    Is NASA looking into that? Perhaps they should have looked into more of Joe's podcasts and found the one with Mathew Walker. 6 hours sleep equals legally drunk. Elon was complaining a bit about restlessness and lack of sleep. Those would be much bigger safety issues. Alas, weed helps you go to sleep but seems to disrupt dreaming so it's not great to substitute one problem for another....

    But hey, no one looks into sleep. In fact it is badge of honor to sleep less and "work more"....big time macho ignoramuses and iron ladies (Raegan and Thatcher)...as Walker said they both got Alzheimer's. Cheers!

    And what about alcohol? You gonna tell me that the old time astronauts weren't drinking? How did Andrew Weir put it in "the Martian"? "What would old time astronaut do? Take few shots of whiskey, bang his mistress and solve the problem."

    There is no way in hell that all the brouhaha about Elon's puff is not deliberate and therefore sleazily hypocritical. He really must be one of the greatest and most useful for humanity people on Earth if so many want to see him down. That's the times we live in - the more someone is attacked and smeared the greater people they are [e.g. Jordan Peterson].

    BTW, I though this was a property of the communist ideology (cause any disparity in outcome MUST be oppression and privilege) - when I was growing up I quickly learned not to display talent and excellence....but really, communism in America! Oh, wait! Oh, shit!

  31. Re:missing the point blue ribbon winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    NASA safety department doesnt give a shit if something else legal could be worse.

    No, but the senior NASA adminstrators know that SpaceX is making a monkey out of them, even to the point that NASA is forced to contract out flights to SpaceX. You don't think that sticks in these old-school political bureaucrats' craws? And all that sweet government money paid out to Musk instead of NASA and the old-guard aerospace contractors they've had a revolving-door, incestuous relationship with for decades isn't a factor?

    This is Musk's aerospace competition using the influence they have with NASA to attack Musk/SpaceX just like the auto industry uses their leverage within the government to attack Musk/Tesla.

    Follow the money. Who benefits? That's where the answers almost invariably always are in these sort of affairs.

  32. NASA has paper trail culture not safety culture by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Richard Feynman describes an anecdote. He found that the solid rocket boosters have some 196 bolts around the rim and the bolt and the bolt holes at 12 o' clock and 6o' clock positions were marked. The workers count the holes to 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock positions to align the heavy booster segment hanging from a crane on a cable to assemble it. He casually added a note saying, they should mark the 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock bolts and holes to make the assembly easier without bumping and damaging the segments during the assembly.

    Three years later he got a stack of about four ring binders from the committee that followed up on his casual note. Skipping to the punch line, they concluded, "they can not mark them because updating the assembly and verification documentation would be too expensive".

    Is there any wonder, SpaceX runs circles around NASA when it comes to efficiency?

    Remember every dollar "wasted" by the government is a dollar earned by someone who did not deserve it. We know NASA wastes tons and tons of money. The defense contractors are getting it. That cash flow is getting threatened. They will retaliate like this.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  33. Pretty clever... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Slick way to disqualify a contractor without looking like you're playing favorites.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  34. NASA safety probe -- what a sad joke! by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

    NASA, you're hypocrites! You've killed 14 astronauts! How many has Musk killed?

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  35. NASA will abandon SLS if 'BFR' launches by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

    This 'controversy' has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that it is likely that NASA will likely cancel the Space Launch System if BFR or Blue Origin 'New Glen' are able to launch. Nothing at all. Nothing to see here. Move along.

    --
    This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
  36. Up to date by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Government investigation into alcohol use by bosses at NASA and in the U.S. Congress in T minus 10 trillion...

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  37. Re:missing the point blue ribbon winner by GonzoPhysicist · · Score: 1

    What really sucks is that we can't even do the research to find out if that's true or not.

    --
    horror vacui
  38. Re: missing the point blue ribbon winner by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    Dave, my old roommate, did all the research we need.

    It turns you into a paranoid, lazy, low functioning fucking moron.

    More than likely Dave had some emotional issues.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  39. Re:missing the point blue ribbon winner by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    What really sucks is that we can't even do the research to find out if that's true or not.

    Yeah, schedule 1 is a double bind for that.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.