Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Workers in Europe Stage 'We Are Not Robots' Protests on One of Its Busiest Shopping Days (techcrunch.com)

Some of Amazon's workers in Europe are protesting against what they call unfair work conditions, in a move meant to disrupt operations on Black Friday. From a report: They've timed the latest protest for Black Friday, one of the busiest annual shopping days online as retailers slash prices and heavily promote deals to try to spark a seasonal buying rush. In the UK, the GMB Union says it's expecting "hundreds" to attend protests timed for early morning and afternoon at Amazon warehouses in Rugeley, Milton Keynes, Warrington, Peterborough and Swansea. At the time of writing the union had not provided details of turnout so far.

Protests are also reported to be taking place in Spain, France and Italy today. Although, when asked about strikes at its facilities in these countries, Amazon claimed: "Our European Fulfilment Network is fully operational and we continue to focus on delivering for our customers. Any reports to the contrary are simply wrong." The demonstrations look intended to not only apply pressure on Amazon to accept collective bargaining but encourage users of its website to think about the wider costs involved in packing and despatching the discounted products they're trying to grab.
In a statement on Wednesday announcing the Black Friday protest, Tim Roache, the GMB's general secretary, said: "The conditions our members at Amazon are working under are frankly inhuman. They are breaking bones, being knocked unconscious and being taken away in ambulances. We're standing up and saying enough is enough, these are people making Amazon its money. People with kids, homes, bills to pay -- they're not robots."

225 comments

  1. I hate black Friday by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I hate "black Friday" (who ever gave it that name, anyway? What, gonna wear no socks and shoes?).

    I've joined the alternate "Buy Nothing Friday".

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:I hate black Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in Brazil: "all for the half of the double of the price!" (call it "black fraud" here...)

    2. Re:I hate black Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I hate "black Friday" (who ever gave it that name, anyway?

      The term was a derisive one used to describe the large crowds in Philadelphia hitting the stores at the start of the Christmas shopping season. It has since been "reinvented" to mean it's the day that stores go from the red to the black, but the origin of the term predates this politically correct fib.

    3. Re:I hate black Friday by Crash+Dummy+Redux · · Score: 2

      Black Friday was traditionally when retailers stopped operating with red ink and switched over to black ink. Not sure why they don't use black ink year around.

    4. Re:I hate black Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They only operate profitably after that day. Or is the Black Friday the only day when they generate profit at the expense of the customers? ;)

    5. Re:I hate black Friday by MrMr · · Score: 2

      In Europe Black Friday is not a thing, despite desperate attempts to pretend it is by US companies.

    6. Re: I hate black Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank google for Americanizing everything in the EU

    7. Re:I hate black Friday by mermeid007 · · Score: 0

      I'm 99% sure this happened last year and the major unions agreed to a deal to do more staffing. After all, Amazon kind of sort of needs them on Black Friday but not during most of the year. They agreed to more staffing, but not to specific jobs or worker control of hierarchy

    8. Re:I hate black Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by US companies.

      If you had insight you'd know Amazon is not a "US Company" any more than is Alibaba. They are corporate states; borderless, criminal if need be, and with the same retinue of ass-kissing sycophants as had any king or queen. Try and keep up.

    9. Re: I hate black Friday by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Ve haf vays of making you OBEY Ronald McDonald!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    10. Re:I hate black Friday by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      In Europe Black Friday is not a thing, despite desperate attempts to pretend it is by US companies.

      Regardless, it seems like the employees are agitating for being replaced by robots.Going for the sabot approach it looks like

      Google new York longshoreman history. Perhaps the European Union should set up it's own Amazon type company. Except it seems like banning and taxing things created in the free world is more to their liking.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:I hate black Friday by Lynal · · Score: 1

      Would appreciate a citation/source for this please.

    12. Re:I hate black Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Not sure why they don't use black ink year around."

      When creimer walks around the house, he walks AROUND the house!!
      (Cuz he's FAAAAAAAAAAAT!!!)

    13. Re:I hate black Friday by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Not sure why they don't use black ink year around.

      Something about leverage. Maybe the color red has more friction?

    14. Re:I hate black Friday by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      They would refuse to pay the high prices.

      They need to ban it to show how powerful they are, then unban it to show how much they love freedom.

      Their voters won't notice.

    15. Re:I hate black Friday by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      There are others, but here is one: http://www.philly.com/philly/n...

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    16. Re:I hate black Friday by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Look at European vs US incarceration rates. Who's the free world again? Most of Amazon's products are also made in China, one of the least "free" countries. Tax and ban away!

    17. Re:I hate black Friday by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

      Look at European vs US incarceration rates. Who's the free world again? Most of Amazon's products are also made in China, one of the least "free" countries. Tax and ban away!

      Triggered ya, did I. I knew that would upsetsome people.

      Care to comment on what happens when people are on strike about bad working conditions with a company that is going the robotic route?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    18. Re:I hate black Friday by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Company automates. Use of robots starts being taxed to hell and back, at an appropriate rate to alleviate the social costs of such. Or maybe, just maybe, regulations are passed to shut this company out of the EU market...

    19. Re:I hate black Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't literally operate "with" red ink, you fat lisping retard, they operated "in" the red. It's a metaphor, and not even true.

    20. Re:I hate black Friday by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Care to comment on what happens when people are on strike about bad working conditions with a company that is going the robotic route?

      The same thing that happens if they don't strike, the company replaces its workers with robots as quick as possible.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    21. Re:I hate black Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before computers became widespread enough to replace physical ledgers, different colors of ink were used in accounting. I'm old enough to remember financial documents with a green ink signature because the accountant was a new hire. So the metaphor is true, young grasshopper.

    22. Re:I hate black Friday by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Their voters won't notice.

      That is pretty much spot on.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    23. Re:I hate black Friday by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Company automates. Use of robots starts being taxed to hell and back, at an appropriate rate to alleviate the social costs of such. Or maybe, just maybe, regulations are passed to shut this company out of the EU market...

      So once Amazon is shut out of the EU market, who exactly is punished? Tax it and the costs will be paid by the EU citizens. A cost benefit analysis that shows it is unprofitable, it hardly matters - I suppose in some world, that means you win.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    24. Re:I hate black Friday by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Amazon is punished. Access to businesses and goods made and distributed at the expense of working human beings is NOT a human right.

    25. Re:I hate black Friday by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Amazon is punished. Access to businesses and goods made and distributed at the expense of working human beings is NOT a human right.

      Nope sure isn't. You would think that the Good people of Europe would simply not buy from them, since Europe appears to not want them.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    26. Re:I hate black Friday by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Care to comment on what happens when people are on strike about bad working conditions with a company that is going the robotic route?

      The same thing that happens if they don't strike, the company replaces its workers with robots as quick as possible.

      Right. Somewhere in the bowels of this thread, I noted how the New York City Dockworkers successfully kept automation away from the Docks there. They won.

      The result - New docks were built in places like New Jersey. Other than cruis ship pickup and discharge, there is pretty much nothing left. Time moves on.

      One way or the other, those warehouse jobs are going to go away - probably faster if the employees whine too much about it.

      Now I'm no European citizen, and maybe they think differently, but if Amazon working conditions were way out of line - I'd do my best to get a job elsewhere. Seems the logical approach when the job is going away, either way.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    27. Re:I hate black Friday by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Now I'm no European citizen, and maybe they think differently, but if Amazon working conditions were way out of line - I'd do my best to get a job elsewhere. Seems the logical approach when the job is going away, either way.

      I agree, the problem is if you are just average, like most people, and don't have a trade, finding another, better, job can be tough, and it sounds like its just going to get tougher.
      Things seem to be getting worse all over, unless you're really good at what you do. Businesses are in a race to the bottom, the idea of companies respecting workers seems to have gone away, along with the idea of sharing some of the profits.
      The future doesn't look too bright, my parents did better then me, even without any education and my son is likely to do worst then me, even with more education.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    28. Re:I hate black Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Other than cruis ship pickup and discharge,

      Me flunk English? That's unpossible!

      #YouFuckingHypocrite

    29. Re:I hate black Friday by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Things seem to be getting worse all over, unless you're really good at what you do. Businesses are in a race to the bottom, the idea of companies respecting workers seems to have gone away, along with the idea of sharing some of the profits. The future doesn't look too bright, my parents did better then me, even without any education and my son is likely to do worst then me, even with more education.

      This is the upcoming employment crisis, which is closely related to the issue at hand.

      Reduced to basics, the automation is coming, like it or not

      But the disruption will be incredible, and not just the obvious one of people on the lower end of the food chain becoming unemployable.

      Automation will work it's way up the food chain, creating more unemployables in it's wake.

      And the profits will soar..... hold on. Who's going to buy the cheaply created stuff? Every job eliminated is one less consumer. Ya gotta sell stuff to make money. And as corporatism runs the show, there will be a big tax monies problem.

      The short version is that there will be an odd shift, where most of humanity is now completely redundant. Worthless to the corporatists and their government because they cannot sell the things they might have once, and it would a take a real suspension of disbelief to think that a possible 75 percent unemployment/unemployable rate can be sustained via Government handouts.

      And no, pointing out the industrial revolution and claiming that there will always be new jobs created doesn't fly. The present trend is different. The present trend's specific purpose is to eliminate human jobs. If more human work is created than eliminated, the trend has failed it's purpose.

      So this is coming. But in true human form, we're going to just let it happen, then react. I fear that we're going to clear up the surplus population the old fashioned way, and that isn't going to be pretty.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    30. Re:I hate black Friday by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Other than cruis ship pickup and discharge,

      Me flunk English? That's unpossible!

      #YouFuckingHypocrite

      BeeHowled, teh Rayer sspewellin; nazzsti!

      My sympathies on the state of your life, that you find a purpose in scanning posts for someone who makes a typo. Carry on, soljuh.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    31. Re:I hate black Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, good try at attempting to spin this as you not being a hypocrite. F++ for failure.

    32. Re:I hate black Friday by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, good try at attempting to spin this as you not being a hypocrite. F++ for failure.

      You still have my sympathy, poor fella. Now get out there and be a human spell checker.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  2. Amazon warehouses are dangerous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sounds like every other warehouse. This is not news. Amazon workers must either be sensitive snowflakes or extortionists.

    I wasnâ(TM)t going to indulge in Black Friday shopping, but I think I will buy something from them just to stick it to the workers. Thank the Streisand effect, idiots.

    1. Re: Amazon warehouses are dangerous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I speak for about a dozen of us when I say quit your, well, complaining and get in the, well, food preparation area

  3. Sounds like a great way to get... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    ...Black-Friday Listed.

    See what I did there? Ha!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Sounds like a great way to get... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You mean what I do with stores that participate in that bullshit?

      Great name for the list, by the way, gotta copy that.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Sounds like a great way to get... by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 2

      And little benefit. These things take time to resolve, Amazon is not going to jump in mud day and make promises. So customers wait an additional day and management makes a note to address concerns in a statement.

      Reminder, this hurts Amazon in no real way. Computers are still taking orders and processing payments. They may not lose any sales. You have to be prepared to strike for a meaningful time to force action.

      Customers may not notice, as these days are heavy package traffic, a delay of 1 or 2 days may seem normal. Getting people to consider the employees before they click is the only real benefit here, with the free publicity. The impact will be minimal.

  4. danger Will Robinson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "People with kids, homes, bills to pay -- they're not robots". No, but if they keep up the protests they'll surely be replaced with them.

    1. Re:danger Will Robinson by Layzej · · Score: 1

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?... - Dr Elvin Atombender

  5. Seems like a great argument for by oldgraybeard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    installing more robots.

    Just my 2 cents ;)

    1. Re:Seems like a great argument for by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      installing more robots.

      What happens when the robots' AI advances to the point where the robots do similar things?

    2. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      I don't think your 2 cents will buy a lot of robots. But then again, it's black Friday. Robots are quite expensive and humans are again dispensable, just like in the eighteenth century. Back then, special machines had been developed to clean chimneys, but little boys were cheaper...

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    3. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Noishkel · · Score: 1

      And it's also the correct answer. The only reason we get technological innovation is because the need to create technology to make things better, cheaper, and more efficient. All of these piss-ant 'fight for 15' looser can all get bent.

    4. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sci fi authors quit writing and become news anchors. Only every story ends with "and we warned you about this but noooo you went ahead and did it anyway."

    5. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only had to read the title to come that conclusion as well. It sounds like an open invitation to fire these workers and replace them with robots.

    6. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The advancement of AI does not automatically include self-interest-based behaviors.

      If you understood how AI works, and how it is made, this would be obvious. Intelligence and advancement are not linear.

      Put simply, we won't program our labor-bots to be self-interested, because there is no market for that. And no, there is no risk of them somehow spontaneously evolving self-interest. That isn't how it works.

    7. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what do you do with the workers you displace? They're just supposed to go somewhere and die off quietly?

      We have that problem, today, and we're literally one economic crash away from people starving in the streets because more than 80% of the population have so little savings if their cars died or they lost their jobs, they're out on the street. Fertility rate is where exactly?

      The problem with Silicon valley is they've been so traumatized by a trip through public education and dealing with not fitting into society in general that, when they go to work for some big corp managing the world, they have zero respect for anyone less intelligent than they are. They go on a narcissitic trip and think the treatment justifies whatever actions they deem fit, and come to believe the world is their playground.

      It doesn't.

      If you want real progress, you need to get over yourself and learn to work with people a lot less intelligent, hardworking, and capible than you are before you create a situation where you kill off a ton of people and end up destroying yourself in the process.

      Amazon, by the way, has not made money. They are not a sustainable company.

      Just my 2 cents ;).

    8. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when the robots' AI advances to the point where the robots do similar things?

      Sure. Because that is totally how AI works. One day you buy a Roomba, the next week it has evolved consciousness and kills you and eats your children.

    9. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      robot is a polish word that means slave, and wage slaves cost money you know?

    10. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Zalbik · · Score: 3, Funny

      One day you buy a Roomba, the next week it has evolved consciousness and kills you and eats your children.

      So that's what happened to the kids!

      I'd been thinking it's been awfully quiet around here lately.

    11. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's also the correct answer. The only reason we get technological innovation is because the need to create technology to make things better, cheaper, and more efficient. All of these piss-ant 'fight for 15' looser can all get bent.

      Do you want guillotines?

      Have you ever wondered why there is more social unrest and more mass shootings? When you make society the enemy of a portion of the population, some of their number will treat society as the enemy you made.

    12. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why on earth to you suppose someone would install actual *thinking* robots on the line? Too expensive and, as you point out, not worth the effort.

      But, more to the point, his was an answer to the issue today. You had to use science fiction as an argument.

    13. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever pulled connections between events our your butt to pretend causation? I mean, aside from right here and now.

    14. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when the robots' AI advances to the point where the robots do similar things?

      Humanity finally enters the era of pure hedonism and near 100% unemployment. We win the game of life, or at least as well as you can without immortality.

    15. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One ton of primary food material like rice, potatoes, wheat etc costs in the range of 200-300$. In a pinch price of your cellphone is sufficient to keep you and your family alive for a year. True hunger is not a serious concern in developed world and probably never will be again.

    16. Re:Seems like a great argument for by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Robots are quite expensive

      Robots are expensive to design and program. Once that is done, the marginal cost of manufacturing them is not expensive.

    17. Re:Seems like a great argument for by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Well... The only reason that humans are cheap and dispensable is that the productions costs are externalized. Companies don't have to worry about them at all for the first 18-26 years. According to Nerdwallet, that's a cost savings of $260K-$745K per-unit, depending on the desired capabilities. And even after the Human Resources are acquired, they still attend to the bulk of their own maintenance and energy requirements.

      Take that externalization away though; and force companies to pay the true per-unit cost... say, by taxing them to support the UBI proposals being tossed around... and the equations change quite a bit. $0.25-0.75 million buys you a fair amount of robot, you know; especially when the acquisition time is significantly less. 18-26 years is a *LONG* time to wait for a CapEx purchase to be received, and can lead to the loss of significant business opportunities; particularly the way shareholders want to see so much growth quarter-to-quarter these days. And as an extra cherry on top; they can open Soylent factories to actually make additional profit from the surplus Human Resource units.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    18. Re:Seems like a great argument for by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Have you ever wondered why there is more social unrest and more mass shootings?

      The social unrest such as strikes and protests tend to happen where workers are already treated well. Amazon workers in Europe get more vacation, parental leave, etc., yet that is where these protests are happening, not in America.

      Mass shootings are caused by mental illness, and have no connection to a lack of worker rights. Also, mass shootings are not more frequent than in the past.
         

    19. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The social unrest such as strikes and protests tend to happen where workers are already treated well.

      Where are the 100k engineering crowd protesting?

    20. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mass shootings are caused by mental illness

      Dehumanize the other, lest we admit we share the same nature.

      Classic. Cause of witch hunts, wars of conquest, the oppression of homosexuals, and genocides. But not at all based on reality.

      Or do you not remember that within living memory a man loving another man or a woman being horny were obviously both caused by mental illness.

    21. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mass shootings are caused by mental illness

      plus guns. Mental illness plus guns.

      What you said is about as true as saying that ice is caused by water. No, there is another necessary condition that has to happen in the same place.

    22. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You should read better authors.

    23. Re: Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am glad we do not live in your world where our only value and purpose is working for some corporation. I know you meant to make some sort of silly pro-socialism point but like all socialists, you just dont understand the real world. Your proposal is disgusting and horrific. Once we enter your socialist paradise where corporations are responsible for us, the also own us.

      No you cant eat that, or live there, or take that class, or bred with that person. Your decisions are not in the best interests of the company who is paying for your existence therefore you do not get any choices

      There is no such thing as a free lunch. Something you socialist children have yet to figure out.

    24. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There isn't.
      Crimes is down, mass shootings are down, social unrest is down (in Western countries)...

      It's like you are completely ignorant of history before 1990. Don't ask for the 1960's back. No one wants that.

    25. Re:Seems like a great argument for by cjjjer · · Score: 1

      The only thing that will happen here is the same people who are protesting with the sign "We are not Robots" in 5 years will be protesting Amazon with the sign "Amazon hates Humans"

    26. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still have yet to define objectively what mental illness is and how that is a necessary condition for public violence.

    27. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      installing more robots.

      What happens when the robots' AI advances to the point where the robots do similar things?

      Advances to the point of doing what exactly? Stacking boxes aggressively?

      (Hint: Yes, this is exactly why you don't fucking make killer robots.)

    28. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mass shootings are caused by mental illness

      plus guns. Mental illness plus guns.

      What you said is about as true as saying that ice is caused by water. No, there is another necessary condition that has to happen in the same place.

      Let me clarify the stupidity of your "point".

      Obesity is caused by a propensity to overeat shitty food "plus" spoons.

      Do we really need to sit around and continue blaming the inanimate objects? I certainly would laugh at the dumb fat person blaming the spoon, or even wanting to include it in a statement about obesity.

      Mass killings is the more accurate term, and mental illness is almost always the cause. The tool used is irrelevant unless you're looking to demonstrate just how biased you really are, and how much your opinion should be disregarded because of that bias.

    29. Re: Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit, you guntard shill.

      You can't murder 50-60 people and wound hundreds more in 15 minutes with a fucking spoon, or a knife or a club.

      You need a tool. A tool specifically designed to kill quickly and efficiently.

      So, just make sure your lunatic has easy access to such a tool when they flip out.

      THAT'S why the US is literally drowning in blood.

    30. Re: Seems like a great argument for by imborg007 · · Score: 1

      But will it clean up after itself?

    31. Re:Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From a country without ubiquitous access to firearms: yep.

      We have crazy people too, but generally speaking they have a much harder time killing a lot of folks. In general, we just don't have very many mass-murder-machines lying around under people's pillows or available for sale at the local mall. If someone becomes dangerously unstable here, their options available for mass murder generally require some trial and error, resources or planning which many mentally unstable people lack, or lack the ability to undertake without getting noticed and stopped.

      The UK has about a fifth the population of the USA. We've had five mass killings (an event in which >4 people were killed) in the last 20 years, only one of which involved a gun; the USA has had 14 mass shootings (>4 people killed with a gun) so far this year. Unless the rate of mental illness in the states is more than ten times higher than it is here, there's more to it than "psycho randoms gonna random psycho".

    32. Re: Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit, you guntard shill.

      You can't murder 50-60 people and wound hundreds more in 15 minutes with a fucking spoon, or a knife or a club.

      You need a tool. A tool specifically designed to kill quickly and efficiently.

      So, just make sure your lunatic has easy access to such a tool when they flip out.

      THAT'S why the US is literally drowning in blood.

      Obesity leads to many directly related diseases (diabetes, heart disease, stroke, etc.) that are our leading causes of preventable death.

      And if that wasn't bad enough, going to the doctor can be just as dangerous. Medical error now accounts for 250,000 - 440,000 deaths per year. It's sadly now also one of our largest causes of preventable death.

      The US is drowning in stupidity and ignorance because morons like you want to turn a blind eye to the real killers. Ten to twenty times more Americans are killed every day by the aforementioned, so spare me your bullshit gun statistics. They pale in comparison.

      And just to highlight the real fucking issue within the gun statistics, 65% of all gun deaths are by suicide.

    33. Re:Seems like a great argument for by geekymachoman · · Score: 2

      > plus guns. Mental illness plus guns.

      - Fix (or at least TALK about it, TRY) mental illness issue, healthy population - no more killings.
      - Ban guns - people use pressure cookers, pipe bombs, etc.

      Reality is, you just don't like guns because that's something people on the right like. You just want to see them fucked up, you don't really about kids dying, gang members shooting each other, etc. If you did, you would be trying to fix the real issue at hand, not this "ban guns" nonsense.

      Dislcaimer: Not an American; never had a gun; everybody that identifies as "right" or "left" is a retard;

    34. Re: Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > THAT'S why the US is literally drowning in blood.

      Literally..? O_o

    35. Re: Seems like a great argument for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't murder 50-60 people and wound hundreds more in 15 minutes with a fucking spoon, or a knife or a club. You need a tool. A tool specifically designed to kill quickly and efficiently.

      9/11 called. 3000 dead people called you a moron.

  6. They Better Not Delay My Delivery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm not going to put up with any whining form the proletariat delaying my package deliveries.

    Fire all of them and replace them with people more willing to express some gratitude for even lower salaries.

    1. Re:They Better Not Delay My Delivery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump, it's you?

    2. Re:They Better Not Delay My Delivery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump, it's you?

      No, Bernie Sanders is all about the proletariat. His comrades like to pretend that they care about the little people. Bernie does not believe in charity. He is a lot like Ayn Rand in that respect. The left and right extreme tend to sound very similar.

    3. Re:They Better Not Delay My Delivery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bernie does not believe in charity.

      Multiple homes after not having a job for forty years and being voted out of a hippie commune. Bernie certainly believes in charity. Just not for you.

  7. I don't even get Black Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seem like the **one** day that you **wouldn't** want to go to a store, but it's the busiest shopping day of the year?

    1. Re:I don't even get Black Friday by fibonacci8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not even close to the busiest shopping day of the year compared to Singles Day.

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
  8. Sounds like an excellent reason... by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... to give your employer more incentive to replace you even faster now.
    Fucking hell people...

    --
    I tend to rant.
    1. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by houghi · · Score: 0

      So what should they do the? Be happy to get a bowl of rice and that they are not beaten that bad?

      As your comment was so insightfull, I am sure you will have a solution.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Charcharodon · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Step one: close your borders so you don't have floods of people willing to work low wage jobs.
      Step two: cut back welfare/social programs so when you do work you don't have to pay 60-70% of your wages in taxes.
      Step three: cut back on government interference and regulations (and the vast numbers of over paid bureaucrats that go with them) so there will be more jobs than people.
      Step four: if you don't want to work like a robot you better start learning how to repair robots. In other words get a better job. No one owes you a job for life that comes with everything you need to get by.

    3. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when that happens throw your shoes into the machinery.

    4. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Work (AND SHOP!) for/with a different company.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    5. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

      Employers always have a reason to cut costs, be it labor or otherwise. They're not running charities - they're running organizations where each member hopes to obtain a profit.

      Years ago (like in the late 90s/early 2000s), Verizon (as one example) engaged in mass pre-emptive, prophylactic layoffs, despite being profitable. There's always an incentive to reduce labor costs.

      No one is going to try and improve the workers' lot, other than the workers. No one is going to look out for the executives' interests, other than the executives. Both have different tools to achieve those ends.

    6. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In other words get a better job.

      A corollary to that is 'get a better skill set to sell'. A good coder? Learn how to lay shingles. Middle Manager? Find out what the economy runs on nearby, without a two hour commute. Put in a garden, the vegetables taste great and the work will strengthen your back for that job at Discount Tire. You'll be healthier for it too. Don't underestimate how messed up it can get. The reset will not be driven by economics but by panic.

    7. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have some good ideas about cutting back the regulations:
      - Building regulations, why should we need to use reinforced concrete when people in India do file without it (few people die every now and then due to building collapsing)
      - Fire regulations, so what if a night club burns and kills 100 people in it
      - Environment regulations, so what if companies poison our water and air ... I am being a little sarcastic, but I hope you get my point. The regulations exists for a reason, by all means take them away, but if you do, you better understand why they were placed in the first place and be ready for the consequences. That being said, there are also bad regulations, but takes effort to find and fix those.

    8. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A layer or two deeper than your response lurks this question:

      what is our long-term plan for dealing with people who simply do not have the necessary intelligence to learn the high-tech skills needed to earn a living in the near future?

      Should we:

      1) leave them to starve, and allow natural selection to eliminate such intellectual bottom-feeders from the gene pool
      2) pay for their needs in the form of universal basic income or equivalent?
      3) throw them all in jail and THEN pay for their needs from tax dollars?
      4) waste tax dollars on government-funded work-creation programs that gives them something we can pay for, but for which there is no market (or for which there is a much cheaper way to accomplish the labor)?
      5) Something inane (specify below)?

    9. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Step 5: Cut the military's budget by 90% so that we can afford to send everyone to college. Then maybe we can all get some of those high-tech jobs this economy is supposed to be running on, instead of importing H1-B visas.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    10. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm very grateful you're not my boss.
      Cheers!

    11. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Step one: implement a truer free market by reducing barriers to employees switching jobs
      1a) untether health insurance from the employer by granting universal coverage, with the current premiums going to fund national healthcare instead of for-profit companies increasing the cost of coverage
      1b) increase social welfare so employees working for abusive employers feel comfortable quitting, and not fearful for starving their families

      Step two: Encourage business to return to passing on profits to the employees who make the profits happen
      2a) Increase taxes on corporate profits
      2b) Cap executive salaries and bonuses based on a multiplier of the lowest 10% of employee salaries
      2c) Tie minimum wage to employee productivity so that gains are shared by the employees that generate that productivity

      Step three: Create an environment where people can get a better job
      3a) Eliminate for profit higher education providers who cannot show comparable results to a state backed university
      3b) Provide curriculum to all students based on science and fact, and not religion
      3c) Require school board members to have degrees in education and years of actual teaching, along with an equal representation of fields e.g. if comp sci is offered, the school board must have a member in that field

      I'll stop there for now.

    12. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      Beat me to it.
      Cheers mate.

      --
      I tend to rant.
    13. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are you going to get the money to do that, given you just sent millions of tax paying workers to the unemployment lines?

    14. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      We tried this, it doesn't work.

      Step one: People start having to wait months for medical treatment because there aren't enough nurses, the economy starts to tank as the supply of labour dries up and natives still aren't taking those low pay jobs because they don't want to live like students at 40.

      Step two: People are forced to use food banks or live on the street due to welfare cuts, creating extra costs to deal with the fallout (policing, mental health problems etc.) The next generation gets fucked too because they go to school hungry, don't learn and disrupt the other kids. You have created a downward spiral from which few escape.

      Step three: People start getting screwed over due to lack of regulation. The collective protection we get from things like safety standards on products goes away. Most of the jobs created are shit, after all if they were not they could exist with some minimal protections in place. People with disabilities are particularly hard hit and forced to drop out of the workforce, becoming a cost to the state.

      Step four: Now you cut all the benefits and support programmes people can't afford to get the new training they need. And going back to step one, no-one wants to do the crappy jobs because you sold them on the idea that a good job is the only way out of the poverty and misery you created for them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Solandri · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Cutting our military budget by 90% would put us down near Ghana and Nigeria. U.S. military spending is huge simply because the U.S. economy is huge.

      Calls to slash military spending made sense in the 1950s and 1960s. But currently it's just slightly above the world average. If you account for Japan and NATO (whom we're obligated to defend by treaty), it's pretty much at the world average.

      BTW, the biggest budget items are Social Security, and Medicare/Medicaid. They're the programs whose growth is bursting our budget, and what we need to get under control if you want to pay for everyone to go to college. Even if you completely eliminated 100% of military spending, entitlement growth in the next 20 years or so would eat up all that savings. Like it has already eaten up the savings from cutting the military budget from the 1950s/1960s.

      I highly recommend you read the CBO long-term budget projections to understand what exactly is causing excessive growth in government spending.

    16. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by hjf · · Score: 1

      Oh you little trollity troll-troll.
      He's not asking for education. He's asking for conditions to get education.
      The europeans put a fucking camera on a moving asteroid and they didn't have to pay $300,000 in college for it.
      You're privatizing your space agency to a charismatic billionaire.

    17. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      step one: One day the big government will fail, eventually, all governments do.
      step two: everyone who relies on a government check will starve.
      step three: those who are self-sufficient will thrive, those who aren't will not.
      step four: the big government blowhards will be the first to starve as they wait for the others to feed them.

      FTFY

      enjoy the gravy train while it lasts.

    18. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh you little trollity troll-troll.

      It's not trolling, it is a fact. You are ultimately responsible for your own destiny, Name calling doesn't change that

      He's not asking for education. He's asking for conditions to get education.

      He is asking others to provide those conditions.

      The europeans put a fucking camera on a moving asteroid and they didn't have to pay $300,000 in college for it.

      You don't have to pay $300k for an education, that is a personal choice, there are many other affordable ways to get an education.

      You're privatizing your space agency to a charismatic billionaire

      I guess that is what is happening. Why does that matter? Is NASA the only organization allowed to make advancements in space travel?

    19. Re: Sounds like an excellent reason... by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Step 4 is the only rational step. The other three is just stupid libertarian retarded retro-dream.

      Grow up already. Thats not how things go in post industrial society.

      Go back to xix century, libertarian pest

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    20. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      Yes, people are expensive as fuck. They also complain a lot and are "never paid enough".
      The problem is that we're still stuck in a world where people have to work 9-5 just to live, despite us having the resources and technologies to not have to do that.

      We can solve it, we're just choosing not to, collectively.

      --
      I tend to rant.
    21. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by hjf · · Score: 1

      LOL it's the fucking government's work to provide those conditions.
      AND you have to pay 300k to get that education. You can't put a rocket in space, or do brain surgery, learning at the community college. This isn't about "I make $$$ more than you because I bust my ass every day laying shingles". By that measure, women that whine about low salaries in education should become prostitutes or strippers, they make a ton of cash! Vocation matters. It's not about making $$$. It's about making $$$ AND ENJOY DOING IT. It doesn't have to be a drag.

      NASA is not the only organization allowed to do those advances. But if NASA is only paying one company to do it, IT'S A FUCKING GOVERNMENT SUBSIDY TO A PRIVATE COMPANY!

    22. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > if you don't want to work like a robot you better start learning how to repair robots. In other words get a better job.

      And when there are no such jobs that require no experience, how do you expect people to get this "better job"?

      Out of touch.

      edit: captcha for this was "insular" so that counts too.

    23. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL it's the fucking government's work to provide those conditions.

      I disagree. I think we're on two separate sides of the "big government" fence.

      you have to pay 300k to get that education

      maybe in a private university, it costs that much, but again, that is a personal choice. You can absolutely get a large portion of your "rocket scientist" curriculum completed in a community college.

      But if NASA is only paying one company to do it, IT'S A FUCKING GOVERNMENT SUBSIDY TO A PRIVATE COMPANY!

      SpaceX has a contract with NASA, that's different than a subsidy. Using that logic, my local school district is giving "A FUCKING GOVERNMENT SUBSIDY TO A PRIVATE COMPANY" by outsourcing the bus driving. Sometimes the govt needs shit done and not have to do it themselves. Sometimes it's actually to the benefit of the taxpayers to have it this way.

    24. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      That's funny. If you join the military they will pay for your school. In the twenty years I was in. I finished 2 bachelors, one in engineering and one in business, a technical associates degree, and had started on a Master's that I got bored of and never finished.

      You could cut the military's budget by 90% to get that, or you could cut the social and welfare programs by 20% and get the same result.

    25. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by lamer01 · · Score: 2

      Baloney, SS is funded by employees. Military is funded by borrowing. What's worse? We do not need a military that costs as much as the next 10 highest military spending countries combined. The level of spending makes sense if you are in war or pre-war buildup but not as an ongoing concern. That's how empires in the past have failed. Over spend on unnecessary military build ups. I am all for a strong deterrent but we need to be smart and realistic on how much we should be spending.

    26. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or how about we create a non-military type of service that does the same thing. It provides work in service to the government in 4 year terms. After that, the service will pay for your education. It benefits the country, gives those working skills, and they get a free education afterwards.

      This would also weed out those that just wanted to waste money aimlessly taking classes and using up their education benefit for no purpose that helps society.

    27. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is an apples or oranges comparison. You can't compare what we spend to what china, Russia, etc spend on their military. Why? the people. They don't spend anywhere near the same on their people. Salaries, healthcare, equipment etc. These are a fraction of the cost for them compared to us.

      https://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2014/12/08/the-minuscule-cost-of-equipping-a-chinese-soldier/

      In addition, their budget is actually much higher in comparison to ours.

      https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-05-25/china-outspends-the-u-s-on-the-military-here-s-the-math

    28. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Informative

      High taxes on corporate profits was already crippling US competitiveness. Why do you think we lowered them? Remember the whining from Europeans? We have to compete with the whole world, including countries like China that use slave labor. High taxes will kill off our companies more than it already has. The rest of your rant is the usual nonsense, how does being a teacher help the administrative aspects of school boards? They have to implement diversity initiatives and measure compliance, a skill that has nothing to do with a teaching certification.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    29. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      I'm confused by your far left anti military view combined with your alt-right nativist racism. Huh?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    30. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step one: Being isolationist only works if you can sustain yourself completely independent of others. The US doesn't have anywhere near the infrastructure to do that as of this post without massive changes to their expectations for quality of life. As much as the US would like to think they could make it on their own, they'd be begging for bailouts after a decade.

      Step two: It may make you feel better to discard those without the means to support themselves, but when they realize that abiding by society's rules is going to kill them, you'll be wishing you paid the small fee to let them survive without causing conflict. Taxes are a necessary evil in any capitalist society. As taxes are one of the few ways that wealth is kept from concentrating into fewer and fewer hands without end. People have to have money to survive in this society, and if said society is unwilling to provide it, desperate people will find ways to survive outside of society. Often to society's determent.

      Step three: Regulations are another necessary evil in a capitalist society. As regulations are the natural balance against unabated capitalist greed. Our society does not require commerce to only conduct transactions that are beneficial by default. Nor is there an expectation of corporate interests doing right by society. As such regulations are meant to allow that unabated greedy mindset to persist in the heads of industry while still protecting society if said heads go too far with their greed. If you'd like to remove the need for regulations, you'll need to fix this behavioral mindset first.

      Also removing jobs, (said over paid bureaucrats, and the agencies they work under), does not "create more jobs." Just like mega-mergers, that result in entire departments suddenly being redundant, do not "create more jobs."

      Step four: How about not automating everything just because instead? This is even more redundant given your Step one and three issues. An isolationist society and lack of paying jobs does not need automation to "compete in the marketplace." After all an isolationist society is self-sufficient and as such has no external competition to worry about or out pace / price, and a lack of jobs is only made worse by installing said robots to replace workers. Another alternative would be to provide the education people will need to service them, given you have no desire to limit the number of jobs the robots can destroy, and to institute a nationwide family planning / forced sterilization program to keep the number of people we need to employ below the number of jobs we can provide. Something tells me you wouldn't be happy about the latter choice's impact on your "freedom" however....

      No one owes you a job for life that comes with everything you need to get by.

      Your society chose to create them, they did not choose to be born. Your society also chooses to demand money for life's necessities. Finally, your society chooses to forbid it's members from creating money themselves. As such, yes, your society has an unwritten rule that if one of it's members doesn't have any money, your society must provide them with the means to obtain money. Your society would collapse into chaos under it's own greed if that unwritten rule wasn't enforced. Now if you want to change that arrangement fine, but for your new society to be sustainable, you'll need to ensure those that need life's necessities are able to get them. Passing that responsibility to someone else, because you could care less, doesn't pay the bills son.

    31. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 5: Cut the military's budget by 90% so that we can afford to send everyone to college. Then maybe we can all get some of those high-tech jobs this economy is supposed to be running on, instead of importing H1-B visas.

      People want high-tech jobs because they pay a lot. When everyone and their mother has a BA is Comp Sci, guess what happens to that pay? Well, trades people will earn more money.

      Also, when everyone's gunning for college, colleges will become more plentiful, easier, and more business-like (students will become customers), cheapening the value of a college degree. After sufficient cheapening, only higher education degrees will be valued... then everyone will gun for those, cycle repeats.

      Careful what you wish for.

    32. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason... by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      We already have one of those for non-military types of service. In the Air Force we called them nonners (non- sortie producing mother fuckers). Those are people who if they vanished tomorrow would have almost no affect on whether aircraft were able to take off and fly.

      I believe the Army calls them POGs (Person other than a grunt)

      As soon as they make it past basic training they don't do another "military" thing again in their time in other than wear the uniform and fall out for PT once in a while.

  9. Interesting subtext... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    ... as robots displace human workers in many industries, are companies beginning to think of the workforce more in terms of robots, and treat humans more like robots?

    1. Re:Interesting subtext... by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

      "are companies beginning to think of the workforce more in terms of robots"

      With the origin of the assembly line in the early 20th century humans became robots in the eyes of the owners.

      Just my 2 cents ;)

    2. Re:Interesting subtext... by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

      More incentive to treat robots in terms of humans, and tax them as such. Privatize defense funding and see how profitable robots are.

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    3. Re:Interesting subtext... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      In its fulfillment centers, Amazon needs its people to act like robots-- it is the job.

      The worker safety complaints have cropped up before though-- I find this odd. While the Kiva bots don't seem to have integral protection, they should either not be in the same places as people, or be locked out of a zone if people are present. If the warehouses don't have Kivas, then maybe the traditional accidents would be occurring...

    4. Re:Interesting subtext... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the olden times packages were kicked around by humans. Today, the workers are kicked around by robots. Maybe Amazon should hire the teens who liked to dance like a robot during their high school dances. That way they get people who are naturally suited for the job. Only one question is needed for the job applicants: have you danced like a robot during any previous social dancing events you might have participated in?

  10. Yes, you are. by DogDude · · Score: 2

    When you work for the largest retailer on the planet that has a long history of abusing employees, yes, you are a robot. That's your choice. Work someplace else if you don't like it.

    If everybody did that, then Mama Amazon might have to pay people a reasonable amount, treat them like humans, and maybe, just maybe, they wouldn't be so goddamned big.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Yes, you are. by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      It's funny really.
      People will get a job there because they have to. Then they hate it but, since people generally hate change, they try to shove change down the employer's throat.
      We want our hands held but kick up a fuss when things don't go our way.

      --
      I tend to rant.
    2. Re:Yes, you are. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People hate change only if they can't affect it. E.g. I have wanted a change in my office for years and I have got the change several times. Every time the change has been for the worse, even at those times when they have asked me what I want (because they don't give me what I really want).

      My requirements for ideal office:
      - No noise
      - Comfortable temperature
      - Living plants would be nice

      And yes, I work in open plan office, with enough noise to disturb me, where temperature is too cold and no plants are allowed for idiotic reason.

  11. Re:not yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Go back to the Fox News website, twit...

  12. Warehouse size versus employees by cirby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's interesting that they compare the Amazon warehouse square footage to a nearby Tesco grocery warehouse - by the area of the building.

    How many people work in each, and how many hours per day do people work there? How healthy were those employees when they started work? Amazon is pretty well-known for hiring just about anyone, including people with known health problems. Does the grocery store warehouse even hire pregnant women at all for production jobs?

    Amazon warehouses are often 24/7 environments, while most grocery warehouses close for several hours per day (or reduce staff drastically overnight). That's probably also an issue.

    How busy is the Tesco warehouse? Do they have a few hundred thousand different items to pick, wrap, and ship to thousands of different addresses per day, like the Amazon location, or are they like a normal grocery distribution center that sends out a few dozen trucks during a normal work day? The packaging difference alone probably doubles or triples the Amazon workforce right off the bat.

    And last... it looks like the Amazon site calls an ambulance for just about anything. Does Tesco do the same, or do they just stand around and stall until they're forced to, hoping the employee will decide to wander over to the hospital after work?

  13. Why does Europe have Black Friday? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They don't have Thanksgiving on Thursday, so Friday is just a regular work day.

    1. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's basically been brought over from the US. It's like how White Day is becoming more of thing here in the US.

    2. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind that online retail Black Friday sales are usually globally accessible.

    3. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Never heard of White Day. It must not be much of a thing in the US yet.

    4. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Corporate greed has no boundaries.

    5. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same reason Christmas is celebrated during the pagan holiday of Yule, on or near the longest night of the year: People don't like to be left out when other people party.

    6. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Because despite all their protestations, they are slaves to American culture. If they had any actual culture, they would be able to laugh off this crap. Bit they don't. Thus American colonization proceeds, and the Europeans hate us more than ever. They couldn't hate us any more if we subsidized their defense, provided free naval security for their exports, and gave them vastly unfair (to their advantage) trade agreements. Oh wait we already do.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a European, I'm not sure — I don't think most Europeans even know it has to do with Thanksgiving, they would just know that two or three years ago businesses started having a late November sale called "Black Friday". I'm guessing it has to do with global item stock management and Christmas sales.

    8. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't really, but Amazon's European divisions seem to be trying very hard to make it a thing.

    9. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A consumer spending frenzy is sort of like drinking vodka, any excuse works you don't need some deep cultural reason to have a go at it.

    10. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's life in your alternative reality?

    11. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The UK started having Black Friday a few years ago, mainly because people were getting exposed to the hype from America and retailers thought they could cash in. But then there were riots in shops and they decided not to do it again.

      Thing about UK shops is that they have pretty much permanent sales. There might be the odd week there they don't, but it's literally days away from the next mid-season sale or other random event. So British people tend to view things like Black Friday and January Sales with suspicion. Often the shops jack up the prices a bit before, then have a fake sale at a more moderately inflated price, and then go back to the normal price later.

      And if you miss one sale, the next is a few weeks away at most. It's no wonder UK retail is dying.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Black Friday isn't so much an after-Thanksgiving sale, as it is a kickoff for the Christmas holiday shopping season. If U.S. Thanksgiving didn't exist, that's probably what it would've been called - Christmas holiday shopping season. But because of most Americans beginning their Christmas shopping after Thanksgiving, and the fact that many retailers operated in the red for most of the year, finally moving into the black after Thanksgiving, it's called Black Friday.

    13. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by hackertourist · · Score: 0

      More like corporate greed seeing another opportunity to try and drive sales, coupled with copycat behavior of local/national retailers.

    14. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The UK started having Black Friday a few years ago... then there were riots in shops and they decided not to do it again.

      They should have just measured the stiffness of their upper lips and saved themselves the whole fiasco.

      If you don't excited over getting shoppers to riot, why the fuck would want to copy Black Friday? They should at least have assigned an intern to check the internet for video first.

    15. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My country has started using the term 'black Friday' too, although no chain-store is naming its sale that.

    16. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      if you miss one sale, the next is a few weeks away at most. It's no wonder UK retail is dying.

      UK retail is dying because the UK is made up of developed nations, and retail is dying in all of those. As it turns out, most retail is just stupid. Most of the time they don't have what you really want, and they don't have it for what you want to pay for it. The only things that should even be in retail stores any more are things you need right now, thus most retail stores should just go away. And they are.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Why does Europe have Black Friday? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese Single's Day is also being marketed here by the shops. Does that happen in the US as well?

  14. The NERVE of those people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should just be thankful to have jobs at all. If they want to make more than warehouse workers, they should start their own businesses. Or go get computer engineering degrees. What a bunch of entitled snowflakes, sheesh.

    Insufficient IQ, social intelligence or organizational ability to do the aforementioned? Tough noogies, shoulda picked better parents and circumstances. They should STFU and GBTW - my packages aren't going to deliver themselves.

    The nerve of those people, trying to get better pay and working conditions out of a huge, wealthy corporation, owned by the richest man in the world.

    1. Re:The NERVE of those people by hjf · · Score: 1

      the problem with this is that your average american thinks you're being serious.

  15. There is no such thing as Black Friday in Europe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article is bullshit. We don't have the concept of Black Friday over here.
    This is the first year that anyone in Europe has ever heard of it, who isn't closely following US culture.
    And why have they heard of it? Because Amazon spammed us with that shit like crazy!
    And now some dumbass local stores try to follow.

    So I say this as loudly an clearly as I can: THERE IS NO BLACK FRIDAY IN EUROPE. Period.
    If you say there is, you automatically stop being a member of any European society. We will not talk to you, and consider you a freak.

  16. IMPERSONATING ME AGAIN? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gweihir KNOWS u IMPERSONATE me https://it.slashdot.org/commen... c6gunner proves it https://linux.slashdot.org/com... he forgot to SUBMIT as AC & using his registered 'lusrname' instead (because he tried to mock me both BEFORE & after I FAIRLY challenged him to show he's done better work - he had ZERO).

    & NO WAY I'd "cry" like you "playing victim ne'er-do-wells" on /. (TROLL /.ers, not all) OR post on hosts offtopic.

    YOU HELPED ME https://science.slashdot.org/c... (& you quit trying to make me look bad trying to "tell lies" on hosts as "ME" IN YOUR IMPERSONATIONS of me e.g. https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... as regards Intel speculative execution attack? Hosts PREVENT 'EM)

    APK

    P.S.=> I KNOW the 2nd to last link above's KILLING YOU - YOU ACTUALLY HELPED ME getting me to see if hosts stop more than portsmash (& Meltdown + Spectre too) & "lo & behold" - hosts WORK on 'em - U LOSE (& U STOPPED TRYING IT in your impersonations of me) .... apk

  17. Typical American (self-/)victim blaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You are soo well-trained in being raped in the ass, and then only blaming yourselves.

    NO, if you can only pick between starving and working at Amazon, that is NOT A CHOICE.

    And if you disagree, you are literally openly supporting and enabling mass-murder! Because that is what that is!
    I don't know what laws you have in your fascist (what you call "neocon") country, but here in Germany, failure to render assistance is a major crime, and can be (and often is) treated equivalent to murder! Because that's what that kind of callous psychopath behavior, that is such a big American tradition, is.

    1. Re:Typical American (self-/)victim blaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for this comment. There's hope after all !!
      Cheers!

    2. Re:Typical American (self-/)victim blaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO, if you can only pick between starving and working at Amazon, that is NOT A CHOICE.

      YES. Since you present a false dichotomy, there IS A CHOICE. I don't normally type like that, I just found you amusing.

      here in Germany, failure to render assistance is a major crime, and can be (and often is) treated equivalent to murder!

      When you have to resort to lying, you aren't worth considering seriously.

    3. Re:Typical American (self-/)victim blaming by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      You're nothing more than an alarmist.

      --
      I tend to rant.
  18. What else was going to happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all knew this was going to end right? It's an unsustainable business. Race to the bottom.

  19. Amazon is uniquely vulnerable to strikes by alw53 · · Score: 2

    Amazon runs so close to the edge that it is uniquely vulnerable. A two-day strike would fill their warehouses with unfiled received merchandise.

  20. You may not be a robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But your job can be done by one...

    Protest, go ahead. See where it gets you in the long run.

    1. Re:You may not be a robot by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 0

      This faggot thinks he's safe, because a robot can't possibly sit in a Starbucks all day, sipping lattes while micro-blogging, overpaying for diarrhea coffee with trust fund money.

      So-called creative jobs are even more replaceable. Don't need a robot body to rant about how awesome Firefly was. We are inches away from having AI "smart" enough to replace the entirety of generation Y.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    2. Re:You may not be a robot by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Such a shame, you ruined a fine rant with bigoted ignorant idiocy.

      Faggots are things you eat, not an insult.

  21. That will go well... by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First, let me say that everybody deserves to be treated well and have a good life. The question is how that can be achieved. The classical ideal of getting everybody a job they can live on is not going to cut it anymore.

    The reality of the situation at Amazon (and other places) is that humans are a temporary solution, because they are indeed not robots. They will be replaced by robots as soon as that is cost-effective, a state not far in the future for most of them. Hence the tag-line they use may be about the worst they could have chosen. Don't get me wrong, they have a legitimate issue here, but they are barking up the wrong tree.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:That will go well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The classical ideal of getting everybody a job they can live on is not going to cut it anymore.
      > The reality of the situation at Amazon (and other places) is that humans are a temporary solution, because they are indeed not robots.
      Fundamentally the problem is that human beings are treated by corporations as though human beings are just another resource, an impersonal resource such as oil or steel. That used to be different, so it can be changed for the better.

    2. Re:That will go well... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      This is Europe, work conditions, wages, benefits and unemployment is guaranteed by the government. They're protesting because robots are taking over their jobs.

      If you don't want to work at Amazon, you can go on unemployment pretty much indefinitely in Europe. Europe, due to these anti-capitalist movements by destroying innovation and guaranteeing a minimum income is now facing record unemployment rates (8% across the EU and 10-20% in countries like France, Italy and Spain).

      We all know from history that once unemployment rates go above 10% that the system becomes unstable, right now they're protesting the corporations and asking the government to take care of them even though all their governments (especially Italy, Spain and Greece, but France is closeby) is pretty much bankrupt. Soon enough they'll realize the government can't feed everyone if 10% of the population doesn't contribute and then they'll be protesting the government.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:That will go well... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      First, let me say that everybody deserves to be treated well and have a good life.

      Even the deplorables? I don't understand. Please explain. Those people are The Other, we need to shit on them every day. Wear your "Sarah Palin is a cunt" shirt whenever possible, it shows how tolerant you are of women.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:That will go well... by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      I agree. I hope, however, that this action on their part will start a serious dialogue in our societies about the issue of robotization and the related issue of massive and chronic joblessness. A serious discussion about policy changes that are compatible with western liberal society, is overdue. I am sorry that every time universal basic income is mentioned on Slashdot. most post that completely misunderstand it are the ones upvoted, but this, too, will have to change. People have to stop being ignorant and start understanding. I am not sure UBI is the best solution, but I know that most of those losing their jobs cannot get a new one just by retraining. There just isn't a need for that many engineering, repair, and R&D jobs. Most of the people will not be needed and most of the robots will produce goods for them.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    5. Re:That will go well... by gweihir · · Score: 2

      You really do not know how things work here. Sure, work conditions are not quite as vicious as in the US, but they are nowhere as cushy as you describe.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    6. Re:That will go well... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Naa, even politicians deserve to be treated as human. I know it is very difficult to do so, but it is the right thing to do.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:That will go well... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      An UBI you can live reasonably (not near starving) on is an absolute minimal emergency measure. It is by far not enough to solve the upcoming crisis.

      The voting and comments here indicate that people are stupid and do not see that yes, _their_ society need stability and people that can buy things as well. It also illustrates a pretty severe secondary problem: A lot of people think that their value as people derives from the jobs they are doing and most of the meaning in their lives comes from these jobs. Yes, I know that is utterly pathetic, but it is how a lot of people tick. If you just take these jobs away and give them enough money to live reasonably, they will still be very, very unhappy. That aspect of the problem is also in urgent need of a solution and we currently have none. Not talking about it and ridiculing or negating an UBI is about the most stupidly self-destructive thing that can be done. Not that the globalized human race is not great at self-destruction...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re:That will go well... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      I'm going to go ahead and have to disagree with you there. The deplorables are...well, deplorable. If you can't bring yourself to condem those racist pricks, you're one of them. Where will you stand?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:That will go well... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Only the unemployment can be guaranteed by the government.

      The others you still have to convince somebody to want to give you.

      When it comes to getting jobs from American companies, you might want to focus on working so much harder than Americans that you warrant the extra pay, easy conditions, and benefits.

      Simply mandating that you receive those things as part of a job makes it less desirable to employ you. If there is a robot that can do the job, it is an easy choice. Welcome to your future.

    10. Re:That will go well... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      "If you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite."

    11. Re:That will go well... by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      I find nothing at all to object in what you wrote. I am certain you could see this yourself already.

      An UBI you can live reasonably (not near starving) on is an absolute minimal emergency measure. It is by far not enough to solve the upcoming crisis.

      If we, as a liberal (classical liberal) western society can't even openly talk about UBI, then we are deeply in trouble. The moment of reckoning is approaching much faster than I anticipated, and we'll arrive at a crossroads - either an Orwellian dystopia, a world-wide civil war, or an explosive maturation of societies. Rationally, I don't see any other possibility, and I don't see this crossroads moment coming in more than a decade from now.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    12. Re:That will go well... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I don't think "with them or against them" is rational. I certainly do not stand with anybody that makes me chose...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    13. Re:That will go well... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I do agree on your options as well. The last one unfortunately seems to be the least likely one. Might be in 10 years, might be in 30 years, but will certainly come pretty soon.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    14. Re:That will go well... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Respect all women. Sarah Palin is a cunt. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. 2 + 2 = 5.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    15. Re:That will go well... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      I am from "here"

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  22. Re:There is no such thing as Black Friday in Europ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Europe is just as capitalist as the US, what are you going on about?

    What differentiates some European countries from the US is the welfare state, and the countries that do it well have better quality of life than the US could ever hope to achieve. But even the famed and desirable Nordic model is still based on capitalism.

  23. Re:Why are Europeans so whiney? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're asking the wrong question.

    The real question is, why are Americans so glad to be shat upon?

  24. Bad choice of words, anyway by raymorris · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't know the safety record of Amazon vs comparable companies. That would be interesting to find out.

    What I DO know is that "we are not robots" is kind of a dumb thing for the union boss to say to a company considering replacing workers with robots. The union is basically saying "you'd be better off replacing us with robots". Bad choice of words.

    1. Re: Bad choice of words, anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so do it. But remember a thing: Amazon needs buyers. If no one needs labours no seller can sell anything.

  25. Re:There is no such thing as Black Friday in Europ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Capitalism does not imply the existence of a random day of special offers in shops tied to a holiday that is only celebrated in one country.

  26. Found the whining nazi faggot. Get a rope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found the whining nazi faggot. Get a rope.

  27. Re: Why are Europeans so whiney? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as they're not Eurobots. Those shits just stay there, do nothing, whine and act smug. Then they shit themselves and hide as soon as someone raises their voice.

  28. Why not quit? Why not start a competitor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've quit jobs that I didn't like. Is that frowned upon in the EU?

    Surely some of our European betters are up to the task of starting an online catalog business, one that will obviously be superior in all ways. Yet....

    1. Re: Why not quit? Why not start a competitor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is if you are collecting unemployment. You have to prove you're actively seeking a job, and you can't be choosy. It doesn't matter if you're a rocket scientist: if the only job available is as a toilet cleaner, you will clean toilets and to hell with your PhD.

  29. Meh, that's going to happen anyway by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    so it's not really a legitimate threat. The real question is will we start taxing robots when the time comes or will we just turn into some kind of dystopia where only a few folks who own robots have food and shelter? Got me, I'll be dead though.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  30. thus hastening Amazon's robot deployment plan by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    Nice work, fellas

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  31. Re:There is no such thing as Black Friday in Europ by gDLL · · Score: 1

    In their mind it does.... :)))) Also boogie men and creepy crawlers.

  32. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Aww, that's cute and completely shows a lack of understanding of how the world works.

    So the US cuts its defense budget by 90%. That means no more money to maintain any form of nuclear deterrent. So that would mean
    that all of our Minuteman missiles are closed down, our Ohio class subs are scrapped, and our B52s are sent to the boneyard.
    But wait, China and Russia didn't follow suit with us. They now have zero reasons to fear the US retaliation for anything.
    Want to invade Taiwan? Go for it. Want to attack Japan? sure! Never mind that we are treaty obligated to protect Japan, South Korea,
    Philippines, and all of Western Europe. Fuck those guys right?

    10% of the military budget would not allow for a single ship in the Navy, perhaps a few brigades of soldiers, and a couple of wings
    of aircraft. Why even keep that around? It wouldn't be able to defend the US or project beyond our borders. There would
    no longer be a point in having a military.

    I am constantly in shock at how reckless the extreme left is about this subject. Is there extreme waste in the military?
    Absolutely. Are the things that need to be resolved? You bet. But saying instead, lets defend the military? That shows how
    much lack of knowledge you really have on how this world operates.

  33. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason.. by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 2, Insightful

    10% budget wouldn't allow for a single ship? so 100% of budget allows less than 10 ships?

    You don't fucking know, you're just talking out of your ass.

    It doesn't cost 700 billion dollars to defend America. It costs 700 billion a year to occupy multiple countries, prop up terrorist states like Israel and Saudi Arabia, and overpay for exotic weapons we only need because we need to stay one step ahead of last year's model, which we've sold to anyone with money.

    --
    "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
  34. Re: There is no such thing as Black Friday in Euro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better quality of life for the lazy stupid incompetent leeches of society. Much worse for the hard working innovators who drive the economy but are dragged down by the rest of your useless socialist sludge.

    Get a job. And no, posting on /. about how great it is to steal money from your betters is not a job.

  35. There were daily mass shootings in the past? by junkgoof · · Score: 2

    I guess it depends on how you define past... It was like that last year, it's always been that way.

    --
    You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
  36. B/S quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The conditions our members at Amazon are working under are frankly inhuman. They are breaking bones, being knocked unconscious and being taken away in ambulances. We're standing up and saying enough is enough, these are people making Amazon its money. People with kids, homes, bills to pay -- they're not robots."

    I have a sneaking suspicion this quote came from somebody who has never been inside an Amazon warehouse, or any warehouse at all.
    Warehouses in general are dangerous places, accidents happen, especially when you have a workforce of hundreds of thousands. I'd be interested to see a study researching if Amazon warehouses are actually *more* dangerous than other warehouses, because I've worked in several and I'd be willing to bet the Amazon ones are safer.

  37. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason.. by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 0

    Someone mod this guy up

    --
    I tend to rant.
  38. No Kerblam man reference? by ukoda · · Score: 1

    I was disappointed the post failed to work in a Kerblam! man reference, Doctor Who's Differing Approaches Find A Shared Fear In The Future Of Amazon.

  39. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Again you show how little you understand. What is last year's model? The F-35? It first flew in 2006 and is just now getting to numbers where it could pick up the slack from shortages in other air frame types. Or maybe you mean the F22? It was canceled after only procuring 195 of the estimated 600 we needed. Those were built from 1996 to 2010. Certainly not last year's model. Or maybe you mean the B52 that have been flying for over 60 years. Oh wait, how about the sub force? Nope can't be them since they have lost years of operational time od to not being able to to be repaired and maintained. Nope can't be those since they have lost

    http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/25031/navy-attack-subs-lost-more-than-two-decades-worth-of-operational-time-to-maintenance-delays
    The cost of a single ship is not the ship itself. Its the ship, its maintenance, its crew (the largest expense), its shore facilities, the crew to man those facilities, and all tithe other expenses that go into putting a single ship to sea.

    The largest part of the US military budget is the people. Their salaries, their healthcare, their retirement. So with your enlightened plan, we would put all of those people out of work. The entire defense industry, the current civilian workers for the DoD, the military itself. We are talking upwards of 3 million employed people. Genius plan there.

    So in your enlightened estimation, how much does it cost to defend America? what exactly do we need?And lets be clear. the money we supply to Israel, doesn't come from the Dod budget. Neither does the weapons we supply to KSA.

    Before you talk about exotic weapons research what China and Russia are doing. There are fast becoming peer states with the ability to prevent the US from achieving its goals around the world. I am not talking about expansion. I am talking about simple things like protecting Taiwan, and Japan. Preventing China from going further into taking their nine dash line or even beyond.

  40. OSHA Equivalence? by lacigol · · Score: 1

    What's equivalent in UK to the USA's OSHA?

    Amazon was inspected 142 OSHA inspections since Dec 2013, according to OSHA (https://www.osha.gov/pls/imis/establishment.html)

    University 732
    Elementary 425
    Walmart 369
    Target 218
    Mall 74
    Google 6
    JC Penny 4
    Facebook 2
    Newegg 2
    Ebay 2

    1. Re:OSHA Equivalence? by lacigol · · Score: 1

      Oops. *Amazon was inspected 142 times by OSHA since Dec 2013...*

  41. Re: There is no such thing as Black Friday in Euro by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Only if happiness comes from money, which it usually doesn't.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  42. Good point by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    they're not robots

    Hmm, good point.

    Smithers, order some more robots!

  43. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason.. by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
    Yep, you are right on the money. That was supposed to be the whole point of nuclear weapons. If someone made a big enough threat you glassed their capital and then the war was over in under an hour.

    Instead we have this insanely expensive nuclear deterrent that we are unwilling to actually deploy along with the even more expensive expanse of conventional forces.

  44. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly you have never had a management position nor higher education. Budgets do not scale linearly. Blue water naval ships do not constitute 100% of forces. Naval ships are not the first concern, particularly today. There are fixed overhead expenses which will eat a larger percentage of the budget if the budget is reduced.

    Look at what happened in the south china sea. Look at what happened in Crimea. Every time the US is sufficiently distracted, more area of the earth is gobbled up. Cut the US military budget by 90%, and you cut the parts of Europe and southeast Asia which are not under military occupation by a similarly large figure.

    Nobody else is defending global trade routes. Without them, international commerce will largely stop. Go read some security papers by the EU, UN, independent think tanks. Whatever you trust the most. They will tell you the same story which is why you won't be getting what you want and the world will be safer for it.

    Stick to the grunt work of command line management and leave serious concerns to people that can reason and argue without emotional rhetoric.

  45. Frame of reference folks by lamer01 · · Score: 1

    In the UK ALL full time employees are entitled by law to something like 27.5 days off per year. So, although they are complaining, UK Amazon employees have it a lot better than US Amazon employees. And, the UK I think has the second worse days off count in Europe. Of course that does not make what companies like Amazon are doing any better but let's put into perspective how much WORSE the US blue collar workers are than their EU counterparts.

  46. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has there been a threat big enough yet to justify using nuclear weapons?

    I would say that is a good indication that they have worked as a deterrent.

    What if we suddenly got rid of them all but none else did? What would happen then?

  47. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The largest part of the US military budget is the people. Their salaries, their healthcare, their retirement. So with your enlightened plan, we would put all of those people out of work. The entire defense industry, the current civilian workers for the DoD, the military itself. We are talking upwards of 3 million employed people. Genius plan there.

    This is a broken window fallacy. All those people can find plenty of employment in other industries. Other industries that can provide useful benefits to society, and not spending millions of dollars to blow up goat herders in a desert.

  48. They're right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they'rer not.

    They are people. Who agreed to work a job. They're also people who can quit said job if they don't like the working cvonditions, or the pay, etc.

    This is why unions are bad for business.

    If they don't like things, leave, find another job. If enough people do that, the business will start finding itself understaffed and will need to correct.

    Free markets, yay!

    Oh, wait' it's in mostly-socialist-EU

    Fuck the EU

  49. From an Amazon worker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work in a North American Amazon FC and frankly, for warehouse work, it's pretty easy, working four-tens at $15/h with great benefits. Sure it's not for everybody, but it's hardly inhumane.

    I'm not even going to speculate on the 'black friday' implications for facilities in Europe, where a protest for that unique American tradition would be totally pointless. I'm kinda skeptical.

  50. "We are not robots" by MrLizard · · Score: 2

    Workers:"We are not robots!"
    Amazon Management:"But you can be replaced by them."

    1. Re:"We are not robots" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humans as a "resource" is a bit telling.

  51. Re:Sounds like an excellent reason.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Has there been a threat big enough yet to justify using nuclear weapons?

    No, but we used two of them anyway, because we had them and we wanted to see what they would do.

    It's the same reason the authors of the 2a feared a standing military. Just look at what we do with it...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  52. That's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And i'm sure amazon is working hard to correct that problem. If workers want to keep their jobs they need to provide reasons why they are more valuable than machines. Refusing to work is not a very good reason to employ people vs. developing machines that can accomplish the same task.

  53. Re:There is no such thing as Black Friday in Europ by Cederic · · Score: 1

    The article is not bullshit, and yes, the media and retailers push black friday as a thing in Europe. It spent 2-3 years growing in the UK and has spent a year or two lessening in significance, but it's still a thing.

    A shitty thing, but stop burying your head in the sand and pretending otherwise. Maybe in your little corner of the continent it doesn't happen but Europe's a big place.