Slashdot Mirror


Lowe's To Sell Off Its 'Under-Performing' Iris Smart Home Automation Business (cepro.com)

CIStud shares a report from CE Pro: Giant home improvement retailer Lowe's is giving up on the smart home market. The company announced its "difficult decision" to exit the home automation market and is seeking a buyer for its Iris Smart Home business as part of a "strategic reassessment." The announcement is part of multiple other maneuvers by Lowe's that include closing its Orchard Supply Hardware business, dumping its Alacrity Renovation Service, shutting down all its locations in Mexico, and shutting more than 50 locations in the U.S. and Canada. Lowe's Iris was hailed as the only entry-level home automation system that handled ZigBee, Z-Wave and Wi-Fi when it came out in 2012. Speaking to investors, president and CEO Marvin Ellison [lumped Lowe's Iris in with other initiatives as an] "underperforming... non-core business."

119 comments

  1. Massively overpriced by Kokuyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is not about the specific product but home automation in general:

    Am I just naive or is this whole sector massively overpriced?

    I have not yet found a product line that would fit all my home automation needs (like lights, door lock, surveillance cameras, garage door, intrusion detection, shutters, smoke detection, home entertainment control and so on), has a UI that doesn't make you want to pull out your hair by the roots AND is actually affordable.

    Because let's be honest, a wireless light switch does not cost more than 3 bucks to produce. It just doesn't. And then I keep seeing prices like 20 to 50 bucks a pop.... remember how many switches you need and do the math.

    After all this time of home automation being a thing, especially with the smart home appliances Google, Amazon, etc are offering, one would think that doing it yourself with arduino or something comparable could not still be the more versatile and cheaper option. But my gut tells me it is.

    So am I being naive or haven I just not yet stumbled upon the right product?

    1. Re:Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crestron light switches? Through the roof. Crestron is overpriced junk.

    2. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention it is all useless.
      Nobody who is lazy enough to want home automation will put the time in to set it up. So even if they had money they still won't buy it.

    3. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering even the smartest corporate buildings I have seen have little more than automated light switches and window shades I would think that the average person would be best served by being able to turn their lights on and off themselves. Maybe some new innovation will make more sense someday. For now, what is the benefit? Scratching your head as to why your garage door is open because of some mystifying decision made by some computer somewhere?

    4. Re:Massively overpriced by dknj · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have researched this at large, my one intervening factor is that I must have control over the devices (i.e. everything is accessible from my home network and the devices can never reach the internet). Z-wave fit the bill. I've used several z-wave switches and have realized one major issue with any device you are putting in your wall.. these things radiate a lot of heat and thus you want to make sure your devices use top quality components. This cuts out Crestron and Levitron. This leaves you with GE and Eaton. I went with Eaton first, and while their design isn't the greatest, you can tell from the specs that it can handle serious shit. The largest room with lights comes in at half it's rated wattage (700w or something like that). I was tempted with GE due to the lower price point for 3-way switches. Until I realized the second switch isn't really standalone and explains the lackluster power rating. GE has nicer design, but it doesn't export a lot of functionality to z-wave.

      I ranted to explain that you get what you pay for. I have no worry of my house burning down and I get pretty granular control over my lights and switches. This did add almost 30% to the cost, so once again it's a situation of buyer beware. I didn't mention other zwave interfaces because they are so dirt cheap that it practically doesn't matter.. garage door openers for $50. locks for $200. automated blinds $50. thermostats around the $100 price point (although with the exception of two, they are all 1990 designs) Then there are the DIY z-wave interfaces that allow you to tuck away controllers into the bowels of your basement, or monitor electricity usage.

      -dk

    5. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allow yourself to imagine being in my shoes. I drive up to my garage door and my security camera recognizes my car from it's shape and license plate using an OpenCV app monitoring the camera rtsp feed. Further confirming it's me, both my car and my phone attempt to join the wifi network. The automation controller gets the input from the opencv output and car/phone wifi connection to determine you are home. The garage door opens before you even think about pressing the garage door button (oops forgot milk at the store? back away and the garage door closes because of the reverse). You step out of your 2018 Honda Accord and walk into your house (your car running OpenPilot with some custom mods automatically parks itself in the garage for you, the garage door controller notifies the beam is no longer blocked, modded OpenPilot notifies the car is parked and shut, garage camera with opencv monitoring doesn't detect any people, garage door controller lets out an alarm and closes itself). Rather than hit any light switch, the lights fade in as you walk towards the kitchen. The hallway you walked through darkens 90-300 seconds later, you don't even notice because an AI system that learns from you turning the lights on and off has found that sweet spot that matches your comfort levels. Depending on the time of the day, the blinds are already open. Depending on the cloud cover of the day, sets the intensity of the lights (about to storm, lights are at 100%. mildly cloudly, lights are only at 40%). You turn on the TV and start watching a movie. Decide to get ready for church, walk through another hallway (lights turning on for you along the way) into your bedroom where the TV is already on and continuing the movie because of another app monitoring the wireless APs and triangulating your position.

      Then you leave and everything is just as easy as it seems. Your uber has arrived, so you walk out of your house. Front yard camera detects you are leaving, lights are automatically dimmed and set to an away schedule. Alarm has armed. This is not a science fiction story, this is my house. And it cost me under $2000 to do it.

      There is no mystifyication behind a Nest thermometer, it simply works. So why should anything else regarding home automation be strange and complicated. Maybe it's time for some young entrepreneurs to enter the market? LetsGetStarted@ecoboost.me

    6. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you have fun coming up with a description of what you think is the perfect system? I hope so, because nobody believes your overly complicated BS.

      This is the geek equivalent of the guy in high school who swore he had a hot girlfriend who nobody could meet because she went to another school or lived in Canada. It's fucking sad.

    7. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost poetry but not quite. A for effort!

    8. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      walk into your house

      you fail at home automation

    9. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My home has no need for automation as far as I can tell. It is a magnificent old house with oodles of character. My wife thinks so too. We might do some research down the road but we would never risk ruining this perfect house on an impulse buy

    10. Re:Massively overpriced by Entrope · · Score: 1

      You know the old line. Cheap, convenient, secure: pick any two.

      If you want a well-designed system, you need to pay for it in either dollars or privacy. I recommend dollars.

    11. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it Is so amazing that you have the ability to make up new idioms. How is it possible that you have discovered a new idiom when linguists have been categorizing and searching for them for so many years? There really is something new under the sun!!!

    12. Re:Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been saying this for years and years. Home automation needs to be standardized and actually working as such, and affordable. Why would someone use thousands and thousands on something that will be obsolete in 5 years (5 years in house timeline is pretty damn short time), when the propietary, unsafe crap is no longer manufactured? Fact is, home automation is a luxury, it's pretty simple, when not involving media stuff. Some heating and humidity control, light control, security, stuff like that. It's simple as long as it is not complicated with propietary crap and way too high prices.

      None of the industrial automation corporations have understood home automation. Even systems offered especially for home automation are very expenssive, propietary, complicated and restricted with all kinds of artificial restrictions and licensing BS.

      There are open source home automation software. I think that is the best choice by far. Get the software, use arduino and other modules which they support and enjoy not being stuck with an obsolete system. Beware of the electrical laws and such though and do the electric stuff accordingly.

      Other way is to have individual devices handling the stuff like today, a timer for outdoor lights, and such solutions. That's how it's going to stay for a very long time until corporations stop going after every penny they think they can extract.

    13. Re:Massively overpriced by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Very good point. I have had a few Z-Wave switches die on me as well due to what I suspect are heat issues. Luckily, Euro pattress boxes are a little roomier, and I went with Düwi switches. Feature-poor and a little old fashioned in terms of Z-Wave functionality, but they keep going, and each dimmer even comes with its own spare fuse... German gründlichkeit.

      As for the price of this stuff, isn't the Z-Wave license fee a big part of that? Also: some jackass holds a patent on "instant notification", the idea that if you switch a light on using the wall switch, the central controller is instantly notified of the change rather than learning of it through a periodic status poll. That patent alone adds €s to the price; these days people expect that switches support that functionality. Still, with high prices (higher still in Europe, believe me...) I didn't find the total overall cost to be that daunting. I did spend a few thousand € on fully automating the house, but I do get a much lower heating bill out of it (Z-Wave allows me to control radiators separately in each room, so we only heat the ones that are in use). And the convenience is worth it - even according to the wife, which is the only real yardstick by which to measure such things.

      What does surprise me about the home automation market is that a lot of manufacturers seem to think we want shoddy products that look like crap, while the functionality isn't very well thought through: there always seems to be one maddingly missing link that keeps us from doing what we want with them. Fibaro are an exception: I can't speak for their controller but their peripherals work very well, they are designed well and feel like premium products.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    14. Re: Massively overpriced by KixWooder · · Score: 2

      While neat, all that is worth about $200 to me at most, not $2000.

      --
      I hate fat people.
    15. Re:Massively overpriced by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Not only is it it overpriced it's just another fad.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    16. Re:Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      these things radiate a lot of heat and thus you want to make sure your devices use top quality components

      Sound like they use a lot of power then. Sounds like I don't need them.

    17. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Imagine you're me, and you just push a fucking button.

      Imagine all the money I didn't spend on stupid shit, and the time I saved not setting it up.

    18. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you have fun coming up with a description of what you think is the perfect system? I hope so, because nobody believes your overly complicated BS.

      This is the geek equivalent of the guy in high school who swore he had a hot girlfriend who nobody could meet because she went to another school or lived in Canada. It's fucking sad.

      But I actually had a hot girlfriend that went to another school!

    19. Re:Massively overpriced by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

      Because let's be honest, a wireless light switch does not cost more than 3 bucks to produce. It just doesn't.

      Sure, if you don't count the R & D and engineers' salaries. And setup costs with the off-shore manufacturer. And any licensing fees for protocols like Z-Wave / Zigbee. And cost of getting it UL-certified. And the cost of shipping it from China (or wherever it's being made) to the US. And the % the retailer will charge you to sell it on Amazon, eBay, or in a brink and morter like Lowe's or Home Depot. And any post-sale support / handling returns and exchanges when a customer can't figure out how to get it to work with their network or is just unlucky enough to receive a bad one. And oh yeah, some type of profit margin after all of this.

      Yeah, 3 bucks sounds right. You should totally do it!

    20. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck cares? Jesus. You wasted a lot of time writing all that shit.

      The only thing I'm going to do with your email is flood it with questionable porn.

    21. Re:Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Automated homes have been around for 20+ years. The price has come down dramatically. Please state what "affordable" means. One person's pocket lint is another person's gold.

    22. Re:Massively overpriced by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      A big part is expectations-- a point for a commercial install will generally run $1,000 for parts, smarts, and install. Residential is generally much lower, closer to $150-200 all told.

      I use Insteon, which is about $50 per control point for parts. I use a Universal Devices ISY994i which is about $300 with networking support and z-wave plus the Insteon power line modem. The setup can be completely firewalled from the Internet. I use it to control line voltage lights via plug or dimmer, Philips Hue lights, Sonos, and some other stuff. The system has been reliable, with IIRC 3 components failing over the past three years out of about 20 total.

      I am also playing with OpenHAB, however it needs internet access and has miserable security infrastructure. It can be set up as a cheap Crestron panel and eliminate my occasional need for the Sonos app. [Base] Software is free, and it runs on a Pi. Not sure if it will be the solution for me-- they try to idiot proof it so much that it is frustrating at how little back-end information you get for diagnostics. But, I have wanted the panel interface for a while and Crestron is a rip off.

      I do not use the system for security or locks, and would not personally trust any system to provide it. A Schlage lock I bought could be defeated with a small x-acto knife without much work; others are apparently worse in both physical and network security. I will kludge something together myself that provides a little more external fail-secure and obscurity.

    23. Re:Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ur not naivve, same goes for AI and all other crap. AI my ass just whole bunch of boots, and wall-street pumping the momentum of magic AI.

      If Lowes exist smart homes...(at lsit potential of money), AI will be gone in no time. The only semi good place is big data analysis, but once explored it will fold quickly too.

    24. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine my wife pulling up the the garage, mini van full of groceries, diapers, kid with stinky diapers. The fucking door doesn't open, because her regular mini van is in the shop, and this is a loaner. She manages to use physical keys to get into the house, only to find out that the lights have been set to my preferences, and she's not normally home now. That's just the beginning of the story...

      Until this shit has major, major WAF, it'll never, ever fly. Hell, I've got two remotes for the TV and she bitches about that. Unless you're a single, nerdy male, this home automation is a solution looking for a problem.

    25. Re:Massively overpriced by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I never found home automation all that appealing myself and not worth the effort.
      There is a few things I would like automating most of which you stated.
      I would like to double check to make sure the locks on my door are in place, turn on or off some key lights, and perhaps preheat the oven at a temperature.
      However a lot of the stuff I see such as washing machines which you can start automatically is kinda stupid. Because it cannot load itself and unload itself. Thus needing manual intervention anyways.

      A lot of this you can do yourself with a raspberry pi, an appropriate relay, and wiring up for 2+ way lighting.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    26. Re: Massively overpriced by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Those who are not lazy probably realize there is no real value in it. It will not raise the value of your home, will need to be updated regularly. You would be better off getting nice floors and a fire stove.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    27. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine how much more reliable your button is over his imaginary setup?

      KISS!, Keep It Simple, Stupid!

      Any engineer would never set something like that up in any way beyond as a toy as it'd be a maintenance nightmare.

    28. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine you're me, and you just push a fucking button.

      Imagine all the money I didn't spend on stupid shit, and the time I saved not setting it up.

      This.

      I'm way too lazy and cheap to automate house lights but not too lazy to push a garage door opener button. An occupancy motion sensor in the garage does the job of turning on the lights as I enter and leave just fine. Walking over to a light switch on the wall is not an inconvenience, it's not like the rooms in my house are the size of basketball courts or something.

    29. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dad?!?!

    30. Re:Massively overpriced by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Yeah... the only things that would be useful sounding to me would be stuff like the locks, which I wouldn't trust, or garage/exterior door monitoring, which isn't worth the effort. My in-laws just got some such thing, and while traveling together they were panicking over every time the doorbell was wrung that they couldn't correlate to a package delivery, but I guess if you're able to avoid becoming neurotic about it... For light switches, a few timers set for when you tend to be in dark rooms are about as much automation as I require. Perhaps I'd feel differently if my eyesight was poor.

    31. Re: Massively overpriced by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      It occurs to me that it is annoying enough swapping out the lock cylinders and reprogramming a garage door opener, how much effort would you have to take to ensure you had full control of such a system when buying a house? It'd be safe to assume that the startup that sold all the gizmos has either evaporated or been subsumed by some goliath that doesn't maintain the old authentication servers, let alone how you'll download the 10 versions ago app from the appropriate walled garden.

    32. Re: Massively overpriced by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Home automation keeps being judged by its silliest uses. Most of us don’t need multicolored floor lamps that we can control remotely. But all homes can benefit from sensors. Your older home was designed before today’s fire safety standards. Is the plumbing subject to leaks? Do wou want ti be advised of breaking glass or opening doors when you’re away from home?

      There are a num,her of good HA sensor systems that will give you peace of mind.

    33. Re:Massively overpriced by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Because let's be honest, a wireless light switch does not cost more than 3 bucks to produce. It just doesn't.

      Sure, if you don't count the R & D and engineers' salaries. And setup costs with the off-shore manufacturer. And any licensing fees for protocols like Z-Wave / Zigbee. And cost of getting it UL-certified. And the cost of shipping it from China (or wherever it's being made) to the US. And the % the retailer will charge you to sell it on Amazon, eBay, or in a brink and morter like Lowe's or Home Depot. And any post-sale support / handling returns and exchanges when a customer can't figure out how to get it to work with their network or is just unlucky enough to receive a bad one. And oh yeah, some type of profit margin after all of this.

      Yeah, 3 bucks sounds right. You should totally do it!

      Let's assume you're correct, that the GP's math is off, and with all of the R&D/admin/retail markup, it's closer to $15/switch. That still means that $50/switch is more than triple the production cost. Moreover, if you're doing light switches, ten packs should help to amortize that far better...but they're not much of a savings even if it is possible to get that sort of a quantity back without going to a wholesaler.

      Moreover, the underlying issue is not *only* cost, but the fiefdoms. I've got a bunch of the TP-Link Wi-Fi bulbs in my apartment, with the ultimate goal of controlling them with some OSS application, but anything I have found thus far either hasn't been updated in years, or requires me to do all of my configs in a text editor, or has bizarre idiosyncrasies that make it difficult to work with. But, once at least one of them is up to par, I'll be limited to their hardware compatibility list, which I'll have to check *before* I buy anything else.

      Now, for those who are looking for something simple rather than an open standard, there's Philips Hue, and also Samsung has a thing, and the pro installers seem to like Crestron, and I think another poster said GE has some stuff...and about the closest thing to interoperability any of these things have is that they all have an Alexa skill that allows the owner to turn the lights on and off...but much beyond that and it's all about the vertical integration, making it pretty expensive to bet on the loser, or in the case of Iris, deemed insufficiently unprofitable that the line is discontinued, leaving those who *did* pick Iris with a bunch of expensive stuff that is unlikely to be useful in a different system.

    34. Re:Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention... Why does every home automation system on the planet REQUIRE an Internet connection? If I don't want to control my home while I am away from it, it should NOT require a connection back to 'Teh Clowdz' for usability.

    35. Re: Massively overpriced by careysub · · Score: 1

      This is an excellent point. Without standards and, yes, regulation how would you know a home automation system installed by someone else was actually under your complete control?

      I have heard of "back doors" being left in nuclear power plants.

      If I were buying a house an automation system might not only have negative value to me, but be a show stopper, unless it was removed as a condition of sale.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    36. Re:Massively overpriced by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      Because let's be honest, a wireless light switch does not cost more than 3 bucks to produce. It just doesn't.

      Actually, it just does. As someone who has been intimately involved in this area the cost is >$3. It's often >$6. And that's just the cost, not including any profit. They could focus on making something that would cost less but have no security, not unlike the one way security sensors of old. But then you'd likely complain about the lack of security ;-)

    37. Re:Massively overpriced by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      As for the price of this stuff, isn't the Z-Wave license fee a big part of that? Also: some jackass holds a patent on "instant notification", the idea that if you switch a light on using the wall switch, the central controller is instantly notified of the change rather than learning of it through a periodic status poll. That patent alone adds €s to the price; these days people expect that switches support that functionality.

      The Z-Wave cost isn't too bad of an adder, and it's coming down. They got bought recently and that should help both the cost and performance. Z-Wave as a stack was great, as a radio it was years behind. Their new owner will fix that since Silabs makes solid radios. If I were to guess Z-Wave will be the one ring that rules them all before it's over.

    38. Re: Massively overpriced by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Those who are not lazy probably realize there is no real value in it. It will not raise the value of your home, will need to be updated regularly. You would be better off getting nice floors and a fire stove.

      Depending on how far you go with automaion, home automation is not in the same ballpark as nice floors (even laminate cost me $5000) or a gas stove (estimates ranged from $3000 - $5000).

      I've replaced all of the light switches on the 1st and 2nd floor of my house for less than $500, so now when I go to bed on the 3rd floor, I can push a single button to turn off all of the lights in the house, have timers to turn on the outside lights at sunset, off at sunrise, I get alerted if someone opens the little used back door, as well as if there's a water leak near the dishwasher or laundry area. I can control the lights by app anywhere I go, but that seems more like a gimmick, though I'm thinking about buying a remote garage door module so I can close the garage door if I get to work and notice that I forgot to close it when I (or my wife) left the house. I have a smart door lock with a keypad that's also proven to be super convenient, once time the HOA needed to make an inspection when I wasn't home - I just gave their contractor a temporary code by phone, and then deleted it when they were done, no need to arrange with a neighbor to hold a key. The smart thermostat has also proven useful - I will get alerts if the temperature drops too low in winter, and if I leave for a trip and forget to turn down the themostat, I can do it from anywhere. I have cameras at the front/rear doors and in the garage to remotely monitor the house - I travel relatively frequently, so that gives peace of mind, when I'm out of the house I also use a couple inside cameras to help keep an eye on it.

      I didn't install the system to increase the value of the house, I installed it for my own convenience - I'll probably just tear out the light switches and replace with standard light switches when I sell the house.

    39. Re:Massively overpriced by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Well Amazon bet big on zigbee incorporating it into their echo plus so it will be an interesting battle.

    40. Re: Massively overpriced by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Power saving uses too. Do you need to turn on all the lights in the chandelier or just one when your by yourself?

      The home automation stuff really shouldn't be visible if done correctly. I'm not sure why a house would lose character

    41. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why schedule the lights? Do I use the lights so predictably? No.

      If the lights can detect me and be automatic that might be cool. But these automation systems are all about scheduling the whole week out in advance and just hoping that week will be like the next. Otherwise you gotta reschedule every light..,

    42. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So all I gotta do to get in is spoof some radio and a camera feed?
      That's not even hard.

    43. Re:Massively overpriced by lobotomy · · Score: 1

      YES! So overpriced. I have X-10 controllers and modules that I got in the 80s. I would love to retire this outdated protocol for something modern. When I look for replacements, I am shocked at how horribly overpriced everything is (except for some of the base units that seem reasonably priced).

      I priced out a replacement for the modules I use to control my Christmas lights. It would have been over $700 just to do that. Are you kidding me? When X-10 was released, it was marketed to everyone (I discovered it at Radio Shack). The new stuff seems to be aimed at the wealthy and is marked up appropriately.

      I also don't want anything that requires an internet connection to work. I don't want to have my stuff stop working when some company turns off their servers. It is one thing to have extra features that are available when internet-connected, but not the basic functionality.

    44. Re: Massively overpriced by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Those who are not lazy probably realize there is no real value in it. It will not raise the value of your home, will need to be updated regularly. You would be better off getting nice floors and a fire stove.

      The networked home automation lights are useless, I agree. What a lot of people are forgetting, though, is plain old standalone motion sensor switches and timers.

      We have motion sensor lights with variable timers depending on the location (closets 1min, dining room 20min). I'm lucky that my switch boxes are in good locations for this. My house is huge and walking over to the switch was driving me crazy. The switches I have bought are very sensitive in detecting people, and the dimmer models don't make an audible sound. They are 100% secure, don't need a central controller, and if one dies, I can replace it with another model from another manufacturer if I want.

      I'm also a fan of the fancier timer switches. I have one that calculates sunrise/sunset based on user-settable latitude, can switch at preset times or at an offset from sunset/sunrise, calculates daylight savings time, and has capacitor backup for power outages. It has performed flawlessly and covers many use cases that people use home automation for.

      I do think the non-networked devices increase my home value. They're infrastructure. They perform simple functions which won't become obsolete. And they are easy to understand by people shopping for houses.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    45. Re:Massively overpriced by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If they were using quality components, it already wouldn't generate a lot of heat.

      Heat = inefficiency, and it implies they used a low cost, wasteful method of generating the low voltages they need. At quantity it would cost them 50 cents more per unit to use an efficient buck converter; so they don't.

      This is a new industry = early adopters = you can't have quality parts unless you agree to pay for 300%+ gross margin for the brand. That's just not going to happen for these types of devices, the convenience they add is too minimal.

      It isn't going to become common until they start building it into homes, with the control integrated with the power distribution.

    46. Re: Massively overpriced by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      A low or medium priced home is going to have a pretty standardized price, adding small things won't actually change the value. It would need to be one of the things on the list of things that contribute to value, like flooring, heating, roof, etc.

      And a higher priced home, those details will likely get replaced by the buyer.

      Fancy switches aren't going to increase home value. The value is in the convenience you get.

    47. Re: Massively overpriced by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Most of it I'd pay $200 to have removed. ;)

    48. Re:Massively overpriced by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Convenient/Secure are direct tradeoffs, so you only listed two things. And obviously you can't have them both.

      That only gets you to choosing between making it cheap, or getting to select the security/convenience tradeoffs.

      In the standard formulate, "fast, good, cheap; choose two" they're talking about the development process more than the product. All the product traits are bundled into the "good" part; if you want a good product, you have to either take a long time to engineer it, or else spend a lot of money, but if you try to do both it will come out crap anyways.

      If you want the product to successfully give you the tradeoff you want between security and convenience, that means you've already chosen "good." And it is a new product niche, so if a business wants to make any money, they have to do the engineering fast. Which already means it won't be cheap. You won't get convenience and security at the same time, you can't pick "good" twice unless you want it to be double expensive, AND done long after the market is reduced to commodities.

      If you want to sell a well-designed system, you have to spend a lot of money AND it will be late to market. It isn't enough to just give up privacy; that's already bundled into the "well-designed" part. If you want it to be cheap and get to market on time, it already has to be NOT-well-designed.

    49. Re:Massively overpriced by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      There is special UL testing for lighting; it is super-cheap. It gets tested, because insurance, but it is excepted from most rules.

      They wrote the rules so that when you build an LED light bulb, even though it has a circuit board with computers on it, it doesn't get any of the emissions testing for electronics; it is tested the same way that an incandescent bulb is tested. It has a power supply in it, you can't run LEDs without one, but it doesn't get the testing normally required for power supplies where they intentionally make it fail to make sure it doesn't catch on fire; nope, it is only tested like a light bulb; it has to be plugged in and operated for a certain amount of time without incident, it doesn't get failure mode testing.

    50. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, home builders and designers in a stroke of brilliance; strategically placed the light switches near the doorways to rooms; at what's approximately a standard height. So turning on the lights as you walk into a room is more or less an exercise in muscle memory.

    51. Re:Massively overpriced by kbahey · · Score: 1

      I didn't mention other zwave interfaces because they are so dirt cheap that it practically doesn't matter.. garage door openers for $50. locks for $200. automated blinds $50. thermostats around the $100 price point (although with the exception of two, they are all 1990 designs)

      Can you share what brand/model for the locks, blinds and thermostats? Thanks in advance.

    52. Re: Massively overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      R&D for a light switch using technology from over five years ago? Reminds me of the old distribution cost argument for media. Except by golly those electrons are expensive, they cost more to ship around than maintaining a physical distribution chain.

  2. I guarantee by Pezbian · · Score: 1

    Vivint will take it over.

    --
    In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
    1. Re:I guarantee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I notice that contractors take out ads and try to sell smart home contracts before a homebuyer has selected a house. Maybe they think it's easier. I tend to think that most people might just like the house they buy the way it is and wouldn't buy a contract after the fact. Maybe these people should find a better way to sell their warez.

  3. The whole automation is missing the point by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The whole home automation industry is missing the point. I spent a lot of time and money on trying different products and I could barely find anything worth using.

    Let's look at light switches. What's the main requirement for a light switch? Yep, being able to reliably operate it blindly in the dark. Amazingly enough, quite a few vendors fail this. For example, GE ZigBee switches have almost a one second delay between pressing the switch and light coming on. Sounds trivial but it's actually quite a significant problem.

    Let's look at smart outlets next. What is the requirement here? Simple, being able to replace existing outlets in existing electric boxes. Again, there are barely any products capable of doing this.

    I'm seriously considering funding a development of the wireless light switch done right - it'll behave like a regular switch but will have a mechanical actuator to flip it remotely.

    1. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think the automation industry is expecting too much from their investments in the industry that have very thin margins already. And too early in the market. And missing the point as well, like the connected home appliance manufacturers usually do. Automation should make living in and maintaining the property easier instead of adding complexity and cost where there was none before.
        Where are my moisture sensors in the concrete to automatically warn and measure damages from leaks? Where is the automatic traffic warning system that warns the maintenance crews in a large apartment complex from blocking the emergency drive ways so that the local resident board member wouldn't have to call the administrator, who calls the maintenance company or the contractor about the potential threat to the lives of the elderly residents? Where are the p2p connected reservation systems that enable turn based access to shared resources like the laundry machines without the monthly charge from the telecom, the cloud and the service companies?
        Instead I can surf the internet with my fridge.

    2. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by mccalli · · Score: 2

      There are also very few light switches. Plenty of dimmers, but straight on/of? Nope.

      This is fine for lighting in your living room or whatever, but kind of useless for lighting in a utility room or bathroom or what have you. I like the home setup I have but it's definitely incomplete - I would like straightforward on/off switches to be easily available.

    3. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and a sycophantic obsession on cloud dependence on requiring a connection to the vendors proprietary cloud offering else the hardware becomes a brick, stop it, people don't want to throw away hardware because a company went out of business or a product line got the axe from a merger.

    4. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My house is fitted with lutron e-dimmers (as part of a simple home auto system). You double click and get a switch-behavior. A single click dims up or down to a setting (I just left whatever the previous owner set in there). It's actually not terrible, and I can't see any reason it would be difficult to use for anyone who can use a standard switch.

    5. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by mccalli · · Score: 1

      It's a compatibility thing a opposed to ease of use. For those to work, you need dimmer-compatible bulbs. Some circuits aren't - suppose I want to automate turning on/off a fluorescent lamp in a work area for instance.

    6. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by mccalli · · Score: 1

      Should add - I'm in the UK and use LightwaveRF kit. Works well, but pure on/off is more complex and requires various relay installs etc.. I'd like a simple switch unit that is pure binary on/off, not dimmer. The reasons are as above - automation of things that do not accept dimming bulbs,

    7. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      it'll behave like a regular switch but will have a mechanical actuator to flip it remotely.

      Sounds like overkill. There's not much choice in switches, agreed, but the ones I use (Z-Wave from Düwi, Zwave.me and Fibaro) all have a local switch that turns the lights on and off pretty much instantly, even when the Z-wave network is down or the switch is not configured. The Fibaro modules can be wired to work with my existing mechanical switches, sitting behind it (a tight fit to be sure), and that also work instantly, though the module does need to be configured for that to work. I'd love some smart outlets as well, but I haven't found any that fit euro pattress boxes. Then again I can stick those Fibaro modules behind them.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    8. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually agree with this. I would go so far as to say that home automation is (currently) something that is kind of interesting, and sort of neat, but currently nothing you need. In fact, it probably would be a great way to waste time and money.
      I guess what I'm saying is, it isn't currently useful.

    9. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Should add - I'm in the UK and use LightwaveRF kit. Works well, but pure on/off is more complex and requires various relay installs etc.. I'd like a simple switch unit that is pure binary on/off, not dimmer. The reasons are as above - automation of things that do not accept dimming bulbs,

      Ah, sounds like what you want is a light switch. Easy to use too, just walk up to it and touch it and the light will change to state it's not currently in. Brilliant technology and cheap to boot.

      https://www.screwfix.com/p/mk-...

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    10. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by mccalli · · Score: 1

      Joke taken and yes - that's what I want. But I also want it to respond to me saying "Siri, house off" at night so I don't have to get out of bed to check whether I've forgotten to turn the utility room light off. Again.

      On a scale of 1 to world peace the problem is more at the 0.00001 level, but in the realm of home automation? I'm finding it limiting.

    11. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by isj · · Score: 1

      GE ZigBee switches have almost a one second delay between pressing the switch and light coming on.

      Yes, the stock firmware has that bug. Although I seem to recall it was the GE dimmers that did that - not the GE switches.
      It was one of the first thing we fixed in our custom firmware (we deploy them in businesses/hotels).

      I agree that a plain rocker-type switch would be preferable for switches instead of the springy-rocker-two-button thing. I think that an actuator would add too much cost. But hey -at least it is not as bad as the touch-sensitive flat glass panales some switches/dimmer have.

    12. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by wonkavader · · Score: 1

      I agree. I think this is because there are too many players trying to grab the whole pie, which is impossible.

      We just need a simple, expandable open standard. If you make a wifi switch, the z-wave guys are not going to buy you. If you make a z-wave one, the zigbee folks won't buy you. So the market is already divided by at least three (probably unequal) parts. A device made for this arena cannot sell as well as a dumb device. This sabotages the vendors from the start.

      Because of this there's not much competition in the market, the products kinda suck, and that makes the market even smaller. Comments above about "if it breaks and my wife cannot get into the garage" are spot on. We don't buy this stuff and move to it because we can SEE that this stuff is poorly designed and immature. We don't trust it in our walls.

      If the big vendors could get together and SCRAP their standards, moving to something open, and building a development platform for the Raspberry PI, this stuff would be a huge hit in the UK and would get developed for all over. It would get ported to embedded systems and updates would be easy.

      But that's not going to happen. No one wants to risk their 4% market share for a chance at 1% of 30-times bigger market. Businesses think in the short term.

      And they always try to control the data with the hope of monetizing that. I don't think they get squat out of it, but they still try. I use a Hue hub and Zigbee because it's the only hub I can find which doesn't have to phone home. I can operate it with REST calls on my network. I cannot find any other hub which doesn't demand a cloud component. This is a nutty situation and keeps us from being able to buy the best light or switch for the situation and using it in our home. And again, this means a very small pool for any product.

      Is anyone using an open-source hub which works well?

    13. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by wonkavader · · Score: 1

      YES. And this illustrates the way that the industry doesn't understand itself.

      You have a home automation system. You can dim your own damn lights. You don't need a dimmer slide on the switch. Just put a big, normal rocker switch on there with two positions. When it changes positions, you flip the state of the lights. If we want dim, we'll tell Alexa or Google to dim, or we can but a dimmer for the ROOM which is just a data presenter to the controlling hub -- and we can make that control a SET of switches. Why do you put a dimmer control ON THE SWITCH?

      Because that's what you do on dumb light switches. It's like the horsewhip-holder on the earliest motor-cars. But here it's dominating the front of the switch.

    14. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Where are my moisture sensors in the concrete to automatically warn and measure damages from leaks? Where is the automatic traffic warning system that warns the maintenance crews [...]?

      I'd wager that many of these sorts of things have been killed by pinheaded bureaucrats.

      Posting as AC since I don't know how much of this is public, but some friends of mine did work recently for a sensor suite that was to be installed on all Texas Department of Transportation (TxDot) maintenance vehicles. The system was designed to identify potholes, spot poorly marked lanes, recognize guardrail damage, etc. and log it all in a TxDot database, with the idea being that as TxDot vehicles were driving around, they would be passively collecting information about road conditions so that the TxDot could figure out where additional maintenance was needed. The first full release of the software was (amazingly) finished under budget and ahead of schedule, the hardware side was on schedule and just a few weeks away from being finalized, the prototypes were working great in the field, data was starting to come in, and the TxDot program managers were getting really excited. The project was starting to get some noticed by managers higher up the food chain and there was talk about expanding the program to vehicles outside TxDot. Everyone was looking forward to quicker turnarounds on road problems, more efficiency in deploying road crews, a better understanding of wear and tear patterns over time, and a comprehensive view of how this aspect of our infrastructure is holding up.

      And then the project very suddenly died.

      Eventually, word bubbled back down the chain about what had happened. Someone high up the chain thought that collecting the data might make the TxDot culpable if, say, there was an accident involving a pothole that the TxDot knew about but hadn't yet filled, so they spiked the project. Maybe they're right, maybe they're not, but in their judgment it was better to preserve their ignorance for as long as possible instead of doing their job to the best of their ability. After all, if burying your head in the sand allows you to avoid legal repercussions, why take responsibility for the things you're paid to do or seek to do them better?

      It's reasons like this why we don't have nice things.

    15. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      I'm seriously considering funding a development of the wireless light switch done right - it'll behave like a regular switch but will have a mechanical actuator to flip it remotely.

      I'll save you some time, it's already been done.

    16. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "might make the TxDot culpable if, say, there was an accident involving a pothole"

      That sounds very dubious. TxDot would be culpable regardless of whether they knew about the pothole. It is the same culpability they would have if a pothole was reported today and was put on the repair schedule for next week, which leads to the conclusion that TxDot should refuse to collect information about any road conditions whatsoever.

      But I do believe you that the project got spiked. Agencies really don't want to understand the full scope of the problems they face. They want to deal with things that are highly visible, they want public acclaim for responding quickly to specific issues.

    17. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alexa, set the dining room lights to SEIZURE MODE.

      Alexa has about a 10% failure rate. Electronic components, everything from simple light bulbs to internet connected dimmers, have about a 5% defect rate. Combine the two and you end up with perpetual problems. Once you get invested in a system, it will consume so much of your time, it will become your only hobby. It is like being an audiophile, but all you do is play with the lights.

    18. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      I asked the customer support and they told me that it's an intended behavior to allow double-clicks. Can you share the firmware you're using?

    19. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Can you give me the mark and model?

    20. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by wonkavader · · Score: 1

      Alex has more like a 50% failure rate for my family. But there are alternatives, including buttons. The point is still the same -- we have all sorts of high-level systems to control the lights. The switches themselves do not need to present them.

    21. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by isj · · Score: 1

      I'll check with my boss and get back to you (I'm not 100% sure what the license terms were).
      Out of curiosity: how many GE Zigbee switches/dimmers do you have?

    22. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      A dozen or so in my house. I'm looking at converting the whole HoA so that'll be around a hundred eventually.

    23. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I'm seriously considering funding a development of the wireless light switch done right - it'll behave like a regular switch but will have a mechanical actuator to flip it remotely.

      That's not even close to "done right." It is wasteful, and has fire-starting failure modes. Worse, any low-cost models will have high peak current that will throw people's circuit breakers. The actuators will use more power than the lights!

      If you want those features without it sucking, you need to build a separate power distribution system into the home, that just does the lighting, has limited power, and uses solid state relays, and soft switches. You can't use the solid state relays on circuits that support full power, and you can't have mechanical actuators+fire safety without also spending a lot of money. And you probably don't even want AC; maybe a 12V lighting circuit, controlled directly by the digital meter. And so then the control system would be an addon to the meter, instead of to the switch.

    24. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Why? Actuator will be a simple low-voltage magnetic coil with a magnetic core attached to the switch's paddle.

      The power draw is negligible, actuator is only used during switching. The fire-starting modes are the same as in the regular switch - the almost-open contacts that just barely touch, creating a high-resistance path. The ways to work around this are straightforward (make sure the actuator can't latch on, use the tried-and-true mechanical design).

    25. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      I'm using ZWave switches from Eaton. They are sufficiently OK, but they still lack the tactile feel of a true paddle switch.

    26. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      If you want those features without it sucking, you need to build a separate power distribution system into the home, that just does the lighting, has limited power, and uses solid state relays, and soft switches. You can't use the solid state relays on circuits that support full power, and you can't have mechanical actuators+fire safety without also spending a lot of money. And you probably don't even want AC; maybe a 12V lighting circuit, controlled directly by the digital meter.

      USB-PD?

    27. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by isj · · Score: 1

      My boss is all for sharing but have to look into if there is any liability. That'll take a few days.
      Please email me at isj-firmware AT i1.dk so we can stay in contact.

    28. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by Chelmet · · Score: 1

      The reason that you're finding it so hard to find non-dimmers in the UK is that we typically don't have a neutral wire in our lighting circuits.

      With a dimmer, even when it's turned off it still allows a tiny vampiric current through the circuit - this is to keep the device powered and listening for commands. This current can occasionally be enough to make the bulbs react, which is why most dimmers recommend the inclusion of a bypass in the circuit.

      With relays, and a hard on/off decision, there can be no vampiric current. Therefore, when in the 'off' position, the device itself loses power and is unable to respond to commands, negating the whole point of the system.

      Relays are usable when there is a neutral wire present, as they can stay powered without opening the circuit, but that's not possible in most UK lighting environments, hence why there are so few non-dimmer solutions on the UK market.

    29. Re:The whole automation is missing the point by mccalli · · Score: 1

      Very informative - thank you.

  4. I'm rolling my own now by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Simply and plainly because there is not a single home automation system offered that isn't

    - insecure as all hell
    - phoning home even the most trivial things
    - a combination of the two above, i.e. hands some company my house keys (and whoever else that manages to breach their nonexistent security)
    - more expensive than the house it's supposed to automate
    - simply and plainly broken out of the box

    or a combination of all of them.

    I know, home automation is still a rather new thing, but frankly, if I with my hobbyist level knowledge of mesh networking, sensors and embedded development can come up with a faster, cheaper, more robust and more secure solution that ANY of the systems I have seen so far, you know something's not right.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re: I'm rolling my own now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the worst part is you have to type commands in to reconfigure the system constantly

    2. Re: I'm rolling my own now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The year of Linux on the everything?

    3. Re: I'm rolling my own now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! Have you even seen Linux on anything? Damn proprietary systems!

    4. Re:I'm rolling my own now by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      I would recommend looking into the Universal Devices ISY994 and Insteon line if you have a spouse. Keeps the marriage going better... doesn't leak data.

    5. Re:I'm rolling my own now by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      About 300 bucks for a device that offers the functionality of a RasPi.

      We're at the price issue again.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:I'm rolling my own now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, screw all that "cloud" shit. Like RING, etc etc.
      I know 99% of the people out there don't have EE/Software Development skills and so they are stuck with the consumer crap and it basically all sucks and spys on you allowing remote people to see/hear into your private life.

      That said, I have been able to build my own home automation system using numerous parts from those consumer systems and make something that works well and is secure. I have my own automation system based on OpenHAB2 and it is integrated into my IP video security system that lets me do things like turn on outside lights when motion is detected in particular video cameras, etc. (It's a little more involved than you might think, because I am sure someone will say why don't you just use a PIR controlled flood light.)
      I also have solid resource monitoring working for electricity usage by portion of the home, water usage, HVAC usage, etc.

      Using the developmental branch of OpenHAB2 is a REAL rollercoaster though. Just not ready for primetime for anyone other than an uber nerd.

    7. Re:I'm rolling my own now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is this one,
      http://homedaemon.net/

      But the author is a douchbag and the UI sucks. The actual architecture is ok though.

    8. Re:I'm rolling my own now by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Get a refurb unit for $99. While you can bit-bang a serial modem, it is a heck of a lot more painless for something that abstracts links and addresses for you. Just depends on scale though. One light that you want on at dusk and off at dawn is no big deal to script on a Pi.

      I used to feel the same way, but so many little things are so much simpler. It pissed me off to pay $50 for the functional equivalent of 'curl' in a network license... but after a month of dealing with stupid issues on the Pi, I broke down.

  5. Try the ELK M1 Gold platform by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 2

    Slashdotters interested in a DIY combination security / automation platform might want to check out the ELK M1 Gold. It's not cheap but highly configurable and has been around for a very long time (like, over 15 years I think?). It has outlasted many of its competitors because it's highly modular -- if / when a new protocol like ZWave becomes available, ELK can just make a module for it that plugs right into the bus. They also make a wide range of sensors for just about anything you'd want to do, and best of all, you can write rules that make the system take actions when certain events happen. You can even get affordable third party monitoring for it from Watchlight and a few others. Note that it's NOT a surveillance platform, so no camera support or integration.

    1. Re: Try the ELK M1 Gold platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They keep the controls for that in the back of the house. I want the security system to be visible from the street. Same reason stores leave lights on all night so the police can see inside and you can easily tell if a crime is being committed

  6. The concept is lost on me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an elf so I can see in the dark. What use do I have for a light switch? I don't want you stinky humans, dwarves or halflings in my home.

    Now move along.

  7. Bad financial incentives by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I have not yet found a product line that would fit all my home automation needs (like lights, door lock, surveillance cameras, garage door, intrusion detection, shutters, smoke detection, home entertainment control and so on), has a UI that doesn't make you want to pull out your hair by the roots AND is actually affordable.

    As the saying goes, you can have it good, fast, or cheap. Pick two. I agree that home automation tech to date is a clusterfuck of incompatible standards, sketchy hardware, poor security practices, and godawful interfaces. The problem is that they sell you a device but have no further incentives to actually keep it up to date or to use good network security practices or to actually make something that works well. They just are incentivized to sell you something Good Enough to buy it and don't give a shit after that.

    So am I being naive or haven I just not yet stumbled upon the right product?

    You're not naive. There are a few decent standalone products out there but I don't think there is a well designed and integrated system for reasonable amounts of money and/or time. And what there is tends to become obsolete or problematic in fairly short order. The worst part is that there is no financial incentive for companies to upgrade or maintain their products once they sell them to you. I haven't found anything I would trust that involved security to my home. Again the problem is that there is no financial incentive for them to build and maintain a good product with good security practices. I have a Nest thermostat which I can verify is a pretty good and (to date) well maintained piece of kit but I haven't found much else worth bothering with. If someone wanted to screw with my thermostat, it's not the end of the world but I'm not feeling the same about my garage door openers if you get my drift. If you want a security system, the best options still seem to be third party services which aren't great but are (usually) better than the roll your own options.

    Oh and I don't trust the voice offerings from Amazon, Google, etc for reasons that are pretty self evident as well as the fact I doubt I'd ever use them. Again their incentives don't really align well with mine for those sorts of products. Even if I did trust them, I still don't trust the third party companies I would use to control my lights or doors for the reasons above. Google might hypothetically make a secure product but I have no expectation that the company controlling the locks will be as reliable.

    1. Re: Bad financial incentives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this approach is very bad. And only idiots buy like this.
      I happen to be aware of a damn fine seller who not only tells you exactly where the product was manufactured, but they allow you to direct the install and they include a lifetime warranty. I suppose that is too difficult for the channel stuffers. Is it more expensive and time consuming to work with the local distributor? I think so

  8. Smartthings now Hubitat HE by erktrek · · Score: 1

    I looked at the Iris - The impression I got was they were really focused on their own line of devices which made me assume incorrectly that it was more proprietary than it was and I also wasn't impressed with the interface. Instead I opted for the SmartThings platform and ran that for a few years but have now switched to the Hubitat Elevation. Local control is best in life.

  9. Lowes Going the Way of Sears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Lowes is circling the drain... they are quickly learning that the approach for Walmart does not work for home improvement stores. They cannot keep staffing Lowes stores with Walmart-grade employees who can't even tie their own shoes, let alone have a discussion about wire gauge vs. ampacity or concrete pressure ratings.

  10. Planned obsolesence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole home automation industry will crash and burn once people realize that your 15 year old house has 15 year old home automation technology and none if it is currently supported.

    Homes are durable items. Many are built to last hundreds of years. Filling a house with technology of dubious purpose is a bad investment and home buyers will want these devices removed or upgraded.

    This obsolescence and product churn could be avoided if all IoT/Automation providers came together to create interface standards for all of these devices, but the opposite is happening. Companies are creating product silos and the products are not built to last.

    Finally, integrating these devices is a pain in the ass. Sure - techies love tinkering with IFTT - but most normal humans don't want to be bothered with that.

  11. Never Heard of this Shit by sycodon · · Score: 2

    And I'm in Lowe's quite a bit.

    Plus.... ZigBee, Z-Wave, Orchard Supply, Alacrity, Iris ??

    WTF is this shit? What does it do? You sure as hell can't tell from the names.

    The surest way to not succeed in business is to shroud your products in mysterious names that do not convey their purpose and obscures how they work.

    I guess the Alacrity people would come install this stuff for you? Why would you go to a DIY Home Center to get shot that others would install?

    People go to Lowe's to buy hammers, tools, lumber, sinks, lawn mowers, paint, etc. they are even nice enough to put up huge signs with the names of the stuff in the aisles.

    I've never seen any sign that says Home Automation.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Never Heard of this Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Home Automation is crammed in the electrical section along with low voltage stuff. Iris probably failed because it wasn't particularly prominent in the stores. The other perplexing thing is since smart home is in the electrical section all the smart bulbs are in the electrical section instead of with the actual light bulbs.

    2. Re:Never Heard of this Shit by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      And I'm in Lowe's quite a bit.

      Plus.... ZigBee, Z-Wave, Orchard Supply, Alacrity, Iris ??

      WTF is this shit? What does it do? You sure as hell can't tell from the names.

      The surest way to not succeed in business is to shroud your products in mysterious names that do not convey their purpose and obscures how they work.

      If your interested in this stuff, you do research and know - same for most other DIY projects. If you don't want to learn anything, you go with one of the all-in-one home automation kits offered buy your cable company, Sams, costco, etc

    3. Re:Never Heard of this Shit by sycodon · · Score: 1

      I'd do it this way.

      * An entire Aisle for Home Automation. Right near the entrance.
      * A complete setup for people to play with
      * Each part labeled with function and cost.
      * An entire webpage on Lowes.com about it, how it works, what it costs an cost savings.

      I'd want people who came there for a light bulb to see it and think, "hey, that's cool!".

      I wouldn't want to wait for people who are interested. I'd want to MAKE people interested.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    4. Re:Never Heard of this Shit by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Plus.... ZigBee, Z-Wave, Orchard Supply, Alacrity, Iris ??

      WTF is this shit? What does it do? You sure as hell can't tell from the names.

      It is like if a car advertised that it can run on pavement, gravel, dirt, even blacktop! Except, instead of saying that, they listed 5 companies that build roads, and said they were compatible with those.

    5. Re:Never Heard of this Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they don't mention any of this dipshit

    6. Re:Never Heard of this Shit by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      dunno around here its a big display right in front of the electrical stuff

      I have looked at it many times, but cost and compatibility keep me away cause it cost a fuckton and its compatibility is lower than anything else on the market

      its hard to argue a 50$ smart outlet when you can get a 3 pack on amazon and it works with iris and 4 other controllers, including the voice command assistants

  12. 3 stooges, back to the future, and cartoons by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

    Now there is home automation. And cheap too.

    --
    Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
  13. Do I need more? by AndyKron · · Score: 2

    I still have X10 and plenty of modules I haven't used yet. My dad still uses a RadioShack standalone X10 controller that he bought 35 years ago and it still turns lights on and off. Do I need more?

    1. Re: Do I need more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes you need more!! Webscale AI block chain cloud stuff!! And a TRS-80.

  14. exactly right by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I have bought various items and Lutron, IRIS and WINK are the 3 I avoid with a passion. Highly overpriced and poor performers.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  15. Geek amusement devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a cluster of geek amusement devices.

    Much rather have a home
    - easier to maintain
    - much longer lasting
    - much better energy efficiency ***
    - reliable where appliances, HVAC, wires, etc don't need to be replaced or fixed as often
    - attractive inside and out

    Gimmicks like smart electrical outlets are wasteful and the money would be better spent on paying down one's mortgage.

    Connected home is a front end cost, a time sink for installation, a brief interlude of less work, then a time sink when the devices are outdated/break/insecure.
    hmm, it sounds like EF for very large database systems 5 years after the system's initial release.

    1. Re:Geek amusement devices by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      You can have all that in a smart home... except the maintenance part. Home automation is still in the hobby / tinkerers phase, and these installations are not maintenance free and certainly not turn-key. My own installation is currently very stable, but it took me a few years to get there, and I still need to fiddle with something or other every other month or so. And that's considered best of class reliability in this price range (more expensive systems break almost as often, but then the price includes a repair guy)

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  16. Opensource and SECURE solution (and cheap?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Opensource and SECURE solution (and cheap?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better link. http://homedaemon.net/