Slashdot Mirror


The App Destroying Iran's Currency (foreignpolicy.com)

Iranians are using the messaging app Telegram to spread fake news about the rial -- and make a profit for themselves. From a report: Iranian President Hassan Rouhani owes his re-election in large part to the messaging app Telegram. During Iran's 2017 presidential election, Iranians relied on the app as a rare source of uncensored news about the race, in which Rouhani was not the candidate most favored by hard-liners. Just one year later, Telegram may end up becoming Rouhani's downfall. The app is at the center of Iran's accelerating currency crash.

The Iranian rial was generally acknowledged to have been on a stable path until May, when U.S. President Donald Trump exited the Iran nuclear deal. Prior to the U.S. withdrawal, one U.S. dollar was worth around 37,000 rials; immediately afterwards, a single dollar jumped to around 44,000 rials. The rial has continued to slump ever since, dropping to 50,000 to the dollar, and then 80,000 rials, and then 190,000 during Rouhani's speech at the United Nations General Assembly in September. Right now, it is at 120,500 rials. But it isn't just U.S. sanctions and the fundamental weaknesses of the Iranian economy that have contributed to Iran's currency freefall. It's also the deliberate circulation of rumors and fake news on Telegram by Iranian currency traders and middlemen out to make a profit.

39 of 83 comments (clear)

  1. Donald Trump upset by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 2, Funny

    âoeThis is an outrage! I was going to destroy that currency!â

  2. rial news by mermeid007 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did he mean to say fake as in not rial?

    1. Re:rial news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know you're joking, but I'll provide a serious response nevertheless.

      Iranians don't really use Rial when discussing prices. They use Toman. 1 million Rial equals 100.000 Toman, which is mostly expressed as "100". So 10USD would be "120". They definitely do not consider themselves millionaires, but rather victims of petty fights between their own and US/Saudi/Israeli politicians.

      Nevertheless, going to an exchange office in Iran is an interesting experience. 100USD or 100EUR goes a long way in the country and you do need a bag to hold all the local notes, because it definitely will not fit in your wallet.

      At gas stations attendants walk around with a big wad of bills in their hand for change, even though gas in many places is only 0.10USD / liter.

    2. Re:rial news by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Fake news is spreading information to deceive people.
      Rival news is spreading information to give a different view point and share additional information.

      The problem is for the average citizen it is hard to find the difference. As Fake news is compelling as it is often telling you what you want to hear. (often the Other is the cause of your problems) "People from other countries are taking your job!".
      vs Rival news which often gives more information which is difficult to process and may mean you are wrong. (Your life choices had put you in this predicament) "Jobs are now requiring a higher level of education to be successful at" and "other countries have better education systems"

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:rial news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Many of those date back to wartime and terrorism had better press in the 20th century than in the 21st (for obvious reason)

      Now what we know what the French, UK, US, Saudi, Israel plotted against them I have trouble blaming them more than necessary. Aforementioned countries used state-sponsored terrorism against Iran (the MeK), spent billions instructing Wahabbi/Salafi (religion created by Saudi Arabia) to exterminate all Shia (engineered a genocide), spent billions arming them, paying them and pouring them into Syria so as to create the Syrian Civil War and turn Iran's ally into another Libya or Somalia (supreme international crime) and the alleged recent assassination plot in France may be a false flag since everything France says has no credibility these days.

      Blowing planes etc. is something heinous to do still and completely inacceptable. But as far as international crimes go, there's worse.

  3. Shitposting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Intersting that slashdot has taken up shitposting to skip the middle-man. The story has one link, which leads back to this slashdot page.

    On the story I think the US sanctions might have somewhat more to do with the currency value than a few people on Telegram.

    1. Re:Shitposting by spaceman375 · · Score: 1

      The story link is to the right of the summary headline, up in the green space.

      --
      On the one hand you take life too seriously, and on the other, you do not take playful existence seriously enough. Seth
    2. Re:Shitposting by NetNed · · Score: 1

      The same people that think Telegram did this are the same that think 100K in "Russian" facebook ads swung the election for Trump.

  4. Fundemental weakness by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    "But it isn't just U.S. sanctions and the fundamental weaknesses of the Iranian economy..."

    What's this "fundamental weakness", aren't the US sanctions the problem ?

    1. Re:Fundemental weakness by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Informative

      Strong dependence on a single commodity (oil). When oil drops, as it is now, the economy suffers.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:Fundemental weakness by gtall · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That and they must support the clergy parasites and their military having their palms into various sectors of their economy. They are also funding stupid wars in Syria and Yemen, meddling in Iraq and Lebanon. Iran is willing to fight until the last Arab dies...which says a lot since Iranians are mostly Persians, not Arabs.

  5. The solution should be obvious by timholman · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Iran should switch to Bitcoin!

    Then, once the next cryptocurrency hack cleans out the Iranian treasury, the entire country will be flat on its back. No more nuclear weapons program!

    Stuxnet couldn't hold a candle to the damage that BTC would do to Iran. :-)

  6. Re:Switch to bitcoin by Shaitan · · Score: 1

    Either too soon or too late. About $3-4k seems like a reasonable target for bitcoin once the get rich quick speculators withdraw. Good riddance too, all they do is destabilize the currency.

  7. I call B.S. by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An app isn't killing their currency, the United States reckless foreign policy is. It's pretty obvious, what with the sanctions and us backing out of the deal that was and is still working that we've decided it's time for a "regime change". It's the same bloody thing we did in Iraq with the added bonus that we're going to wreck their economy first.

    What bothers me is that not only is it so transparent what we're doing but that nobody particularity cares. You'd think Americans on all sides would be pretty angry that we're overthrowing gov'ts left and right. Outside of a few left wing news outlets and the BBC I don't see anyone talking about it.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: I call B.S. by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Despite all the anger at Bush after the Iraq invasion, before the war, most Americans supported it. The most telling point for me at that time was a commentator who said, "Most Americans would answer the protest 'no blood for oil' with 'why not?" Arguably people weren't upset about invading Iraq, they were upset that Bush didn't get the job done quickly. Win already. For comparison, people were basically OK with the Lybia invasion under Obama, too, even if some Republicans complain a ton about Benghazi.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re: I call B.S. by MobyDisk · · Score: 2

      a commentator who said, "Most Americans would answer the protest 'no blood for oil' with 'why not?"

      (Which Bush? Which war? I assume you are referring to Operation Desert Shield, under George Bush Jr, in 2003.)

      A commentator may have said that, but it is not true. Americans did not think invading Iraq was about oil. At the time, oil prices were very low so such motivation would have been weak. They were convinced that Saddam Hussein was developing nuclear weapons, that he was behind the 9/11 attacks, and that he held a store of chemical weapons. The public wanted revenge for 9/11 and were willing to attack whatever strawman the government assigned the blame to. They knew from experience in the prior war in 1991, that oil prices were not going to go down.

    3. Re: I call B.S. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Oil prices were at their highest price since the oil shock ended. They weren't "very low"

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:I call B.S. by jythie · · Score: 1

      The effect of the app is kinda like a secondary infection, it can only happen when the system is already weak, but that does not mean its own impact is insignificant.

    5. Re:I call B.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      An app isn't killing their currency, the United States reckless foreign policy is. It's pretty obvious, what with the sanctions and us backing out of the deal that was and is still working that we've decided it's time for a "regime change". It's the same bloody thing we did in Iraq with the added bonus that we're going to wreck their economy first.

      What bothers me is that not only is it so transparent what we're doing but that nobody particularity cares. You'd think Americans on all sides would be pretty angry that we're overthrowing gov'ts left and right. Outside of a few left wing news outlets and the BBC I don't see anyone talking about it.

      Where was your outrage when Obama fucked up Libya worse than Iraq?

    6. Re:I call B.S. by Dragonslicer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What bothers me is that not only is it so transparent what we're doing but that nobody particularity cares. You'd think Americans on all sides would be pretty angry that we're overthrowing gov'ts left and right.

      Why would anyone think that? The US has been overthrowing governments for decades. Why would people on all sides suddenly be angry about it? The people that didn't like it 30 years ago still don't like it, and the people that didn't care 30 years ago still don't care.

    7. Re: I call B.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah right, for 1000 years the Religion Of Peace, and the religion of the Prince of Peace, had no reason to fight. Not the crusades, or the Moors in Spain, not the first American foreign war in 1799...

    8. Re:I call B.S. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It is the job of the US government to aggressively reorder the Middle East and ruthlessly destroy all the enemies of Israel. Overthrowing Iraq did a lot for Israeli security and now it's time to go to the next target. Don't like it? You some kind of anti-Semite Nazi?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re: I call B.S. by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      America's religious and racial diversity prevents it from ever getting that far without a civil war first. So it would implode internally and lose the power to project force in any meaningful way.

  8. Bad headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even the summary says what is really destroying the currency - " deliberate circulation of rumors and fake news". Telegram (the app) is not at fault. It might be ENABLING the destruction of the currency, but it's not CAUSING it.

  9. Fake news everywhere by Dorianny · · Score: 1

    The " fake news on Telegram" is no more fake then the government propaganda pretending that everything is fine and dandy. Everyone knows the government and the tightly controlled media is lying, they have no choice but to seek the truth elsewhere which makes them a easy target for manipulators and scammers

  10. Re: Switch to bitcoin by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    How on earth do you calculate that as the reasonable level?

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  11. Re:Reckless is letting Iran have nuclear weapons by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    Hamas upgrading the rockets they bombard Israel with daily to be nuclear...

    Israel and Palestine are so close they would essentially be nuking themselves.

  12. Re:Reckless is letting Iran have nuclear weapons by jythie · · Score: 1

    Meh, Iran with nuclear weapons would probably be one of the most stabilizing events that could happen in the region, even if it did hurt the US's feelings that the country which embarrassed them still refuses to do as it is told.

  13. None of what you just wrote is true by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    that "Plane full of cash and gold" was us giving them back money that was theirs. We'd gotten ahold of about $6 billion of their money and basically stole it. You can do that if you're at war. We're not.

    And they don't have nukes. Even after Trump reneged on the deal they keep following it. Just like Iraq there are no weapons of mass destruction. We've got independent investigators confirming that.

    Fact it, Trump wants a war. Just like Bush needed one to stay in power. You know this. You're either Trolling or being paid to Troll. Either way it pisses me off. We're spending trillions overthrowing governments. Meanwhile we don't have universal healthcare and tuition free college. Both of which are killing us on the competitive world stage.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:None of what you just wrote is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are literally talking about a guy who asked "what's the point of having nuclear weapons if you don't use them?" We're one presidential cocaine bender away from a nuclear annihilation, and you're just fine with that because it's *your* doomsday cult making it happen.

    2. Re:None of what you just wrote is true by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Fun fact: you know who wrote the infamous false flag WMD memo that was used as justification to start the Iraq War? Robert S. Mueller III. Yup, the same one. The smoking gun right here.

      The Bush administration's central justification for the Iraq war was the belief that former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and could transfer them to militants. No such weapons were found after the invasion.

      Here's video evidence of Mueller lying to Congress. He gave the impression that the FBI, the trusted organization that would never lie, approved of the invasion as absolutely necessary. Because Iraq was going to give WMD to Al-Qaeda, despite Saddam utterly hating Islamists and Al-Qaeda utterly hating nationalists like Saddam.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re: None of what you just wrote is true by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      ^^^ This. Amen.

      Just don't expect a troll to respect facts.

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  14. Re: Switch to bitcoin by Rolgar · · Score: 1

    If it continues to drop, it will collapse. Currently, the search "what is the cost of mining bitcoin" on google says that the cost of mining a bitcoin in the US is around $4750, depending on your cost of electricity. Venezuela and many Middle East and nearby countries have costs of half as much, but there are only a couple of dozen where the current cost makes it feasible long term unless something changes. After all, if the cost drops below the cost of electricity, then the miners that help transactions be completed should eventually quit, destroying the processing network. Of course, if they do, mining costs per coin could go down as fewer miners remain active, and those that stay get may get more coins for the same total costs, spreading the costs across more coins.

    Some technical analysts may think they can predict the market for various coins. Maybe they can, but the price has been in a slide for nearly a year, and it's always important to respect the trend, which means the price is more likely to go down than up, meaning I wouldn't buy at any price ever until their was good reason to see a turn around, and I'd just as soon have my money in a company that actually has revenues and profits that provide a floor for prices.

  15. Re:Reckless is letting Iran have nuclear weapons by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Reckless was not supporting full fledged revolutions, like Obama chose to do.

    USA's attempts at meddling several decades ago is how Khomeini got into power. Meddling backfires more often than not. You make it sound like a sure-shot thing. The newer crew always think they are better at meddling.

    The rest of your accusations are too vague to evaluate. No negotiations will give us everything we want; we'll have to make trade-offs. To think one can magically get everything they want without making concessions to the other side is silly and/or arrogant.

  16. Brazil by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    If you want Real currency you have to go to Brazil.

  17. Re:Reckless is letting Iran have nuclear weapons by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you saw news about people dying in Yemen, and just assumed that the bogeyman of the year must be to blame, like an obedient sheeple.

  18. You can thank America for that too. by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Seriously. The reason for the Clergy being so prevalent in Iran is that when we overthrew their democratically elected gov't and installed the Shah the one place their people could foment a rebellion was in the Mosques. So we've got ourselves to thank for radicalizing Iran.

    As for the Military, the most powerful nation on earth has repeatedly signaled a desire to invade. They're gonna want a strong military. They can't win, but they can hope to give us a bloody enough nose that we turn around and go home.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  19. Re: Switch to bitcoin by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    After all, if the cost drops below the cost of electricity, then the miners that help transactions be completed should eventually quit, destroying the processing network.

    That wouldn't destroy the processing network.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  20. Re:Reckless is letting Iran have nuclear weapons by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    They do not want to destroy their own holy lands. That would defeat their purpose.