Slashdot Mirror


George H.W. Bush, 41st President of the United States, Dies At 94 (washingtonpost.com)

George H.W. Bush, the 41st president of the United States, has passed away tonight at the age of 94. As The Washington Post reports, he was "the last veteran of World War II to serve as president, he was a consummate public servant and a statesman who helped guide the nation and the world out of a four-decade Cold War that had carried the threat of nuclear annihilation." From the report: Although Mr. Bush served as president three decades ago, his values and ethic seem centuries removed from today's acrid political culture. His currency of personal connection was the handwritten letter -- not the social media blast. He had a competitive nature and considerable ambition that were not easy to discern under the sheen of his New England politesse and his earnest generosity. He was capable of running hard-edge political campaigns, and took the nation to war. But his principal achievements were produced at negotiating tables.

Despite his grace, Mr. Bush was an easy subject for caricature. He was an honors graduate of Yale University who was often at a loss for words in public, especially when it came to talking about himself. Though he was tested in combat when he was barely out of adolescence, he was branded "a wimp" by those who doubted whether he had essential convictions. This paradox in the public image of Mr. Bush dogged him, as did domestic events. His lack of sure-footedness in the face of a faltering economy produced a nosedive in the soaring popularity he enjoyed after the triumph of the Persian Gulf War. In 1992, he lost his bid for a second term as president.
Bush's spokesman Jim McGrath announced his death on Twitter, but didn't provide the cause of death. In 2012, he announced that he had vascular Parkinsonism, a condition that limited his mobility.

UPDATE: George W. Bush, the 43rd President of the United States, has issued a statement on the passing of his father: "Jeb, Neil, Marvin, Doro, and I are saddened to announce that after 94 remarkable years, our dear Dad has died. George H. W. Bush was a man of the highest character and the best dad a son or daughter could ask for. The entire Bush family is deeply grateful for 41's life and love, for the compassion of those who have cared and prayed for Dad, and for the condolences of our friends and fellow citizens."

61 of 408 comments (clear)

  1. RIP by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thus goeth the last Republican politician that I still respected.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    1. Re:RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      McCarthy was Congress, Hoover wasn't exposed yet, FBI was SOP for the day. Typically the oversight role was Congress and the courts. The best you can do is go re-read your books with both eyes open.

    2. Re:RIP by spintriae · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Eisenhower wasn't responsible for McCarthy and by all accounts didn't like or approve of him. It's not as if the president can just fire a congressman he doesn't like.

    3. Re:RIP by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ike despised McCarthy, but felt that publicly confronting him would strengthen the Taft wing of the Republican Party. Many people on the right viewed Ike as a RINO. So he worked behind the scenes to undermine McCarthy.

      But it should also be noted that when Soviet archives were opened in the 1990s, some of the people that Joe McCarthy was accused of unjustly persecuting turned out to have actually been commie agents.

    4. Re:RIP by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, and John Adams was a "hideous hermaphroditical character, which has neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman." *a fool, a hypocrite, a criminal, and a tyrant*

      And Jefferson! "a mean-spirited, low-lived fellow, the son of a half-breed Indian squaw, sired by a Virginia mulatto father." *a weakling, an atheist, a libertine, and a coward.*

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:RIP by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But it should also be noted that when Soviet archives were opened in the 1990s, some of the people that Joe McCarthy was accused of unjustly persecuting turned out to have actually been commie agents.

      That's how it always is.......there is a problem in the world, but then a stupid politician (or group) comes along and tries to co-opt it for their own purposes.

      Yeah there are terrorists in the middle east, but Bush used that to manipulate the public into supporting an Iraq invasion. Yes, there were Russian spies in America, but McCarthy used that fact to push his own agenda. Yes, atmospheric CO2 does have an effect on global temperature, but plenty of people have tried to use that problem for their own agenda (and the agenda can be anything from winning an election to wealth redistribution).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:RIP by jpaine619 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But it should also be noted that when Soviet archives were opened in the 1990s, some of the people that Joe McCarthy was accused of unjustly persecuting turned out to have actually been commie agents.

      That is the most retarded....... If I accuse everyone in a room of being a dick sucking homosexual, statistically I'll be right 15% of the time.. Yeah, that's the exact same logic you just used, asshole.

      Cast a wide enough net.....

    7. Re:RIP by gtall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bush Jr. invaded Iraq, Bush Sr. invaded Kuwait. He made two big mistakes. Telling the Iraqi Shi'ites to rebel against Saddam and then didn't back them...they never forgave the U.S. for that. The other mistake was giving Kuwait back to the fat boys in the robes. What should have happened to give Kuwait to the Palestinians. It would have removed the biggest threat to Israel, paid the Kuwaitis back for being such fuck ups, and given the Iranians and Saudis their own private Palestinian problem. It have been an easy sell to the PLO, Arafat was always a sleaze and it comes with its own oil supply.

    8. Re:RIP by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Eisenhower presided over the McCarthy era and a lot of FBI abuses. He seems to have been a likable guy, but the best you can say is his eyes were half closed during his presidency.

      I remember McCarthyism. Night after night of pundits representing the minority party that had run out of ideas accusing the President and his associates of being stooges for the Russians. Aren't we glad that era is long gone?

    9. Re:RIP by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But it should also be noted that when Soviet archives were opened in the 1990s, some of the people that Joe McCarthy was accused of unjustly persecuting turned out to have actually been commie agents.

      Not really surprising, if you let the cops break down doors at random in violation of the 4th amendment they'd probably find a lot of guilty people too. In retrospect you can always claim the times you were right were justified and the times you were wrong were honest mistakes. There's no doubt more guilty people would go to jail if you lowered the standard from "beyond a reasonable doubt" to "probably", but a whole lot more innocent men too. And beyond that you have guilt by association and "no smoke without fire", statistically you're probably more likely to be a communist if your friends are communists than the general population. And there's probably more rapists among those accused of rape than those who've never been accused. It's just a terrible way to run a justice system. And beyond that lies putting the blame on entire populations, which is how you end up with genocide.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    10. Re: RIP by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 3, Informative

      And yet roughly 2 million of them are now Jordanian citizens.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    11. Re:RIP by Junta · · Score: 2

      The last republican *president* worthy of respect, but there have been plenty of respectable republican politicians.

      Of course it's hard to notice them among the rabid anti-science, racist, and sycophantic behavior that dominates the party.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    12. Re:RIP by hey! · · Score: 2

      Bob Dole is still alive -- the last Presidential candidate of the Greatest Generation and the last nominee to run as a genuine conservative.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    13. Re: RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      OK, I'll bite: who were some of the people who were accused who were innocent?

      Quoting from Wikipedia:

      Nelson Algren, Lucille Ball, Alvah Bessie, Elmer Bernstein, Leonard Bernstein, David Bohm,
      Bertolt Brecht, Archie Brown, Esther Brunauer, Charlie Chaplin, Aaron Copland, Bartley Crum,Howard Da Silva, Jules Dassin, Dolores del RÃo, Edward Dmytryk, W.E.B. Du Bois, George A. Eddy, Albert Einstein, Hanns Eisler, Howard Fast, Lion Feuchtwanger, Carl Foreman, John Garfield, C.H. Garrigues,
      Jack Gilford, Allen Ginsberg, Ruth Gordon, Lee Grant, Dashiell Hammett, Elizabeth Hawes, Lillian Hellman, Dorothy Healey,Lena Horne, Langston Hughes, Marsha Hunt, Sam Jaffe, Theodore Kaghan,
      Garson Kanin, Benjamin Keen, Otto Klemperer, Gypsy Rose Lee, Cornelius Lanczos,Ring Lardner Jr., Arthur Laurents, Philip Loeb, Joseph Losey, Albert Maltz, Heinrich Mann, Klaus Mann, Thomas Mann, Thomas McGrath, Burgess Meredith, Arthur Miller, Jessica Mitford, Dimitri Mitropoulos, Zero Mostel, Joseph Needham, J. Robert Oppenheimer, Dorothy Parker, Linus Pauling, Samuel Reber, Al Richmond, Martin Ritt, Paul Robeson, Edward G. Robinson, Waldo Salt, Jean Seberg, Pete Seeger, Artie Shaw, Irwin Shaw, William L. Shirer, Lionel Stander, Dirk Jan Struik, Paul Sweezy, Charles W. Thayer, Dalton Trumbo, Tsien Hsue-shen, Sam Wanamaker, Orson Welles, Gene Weltfish.

      and that is just some of the notable people. Think of the thousands of others fired, blacklisted, and deported. Also read Yates v. United States, Watkins v. United States.

      We aren't talking about people going to jail here. You just can't serve in the US government when your goal is to overthrow said government. That's all.

      Somebody isn't familiar with the history of Red Scares in America, which preceded McCarthy, and include false accusations of violence(Haymarket Square), imprisonment (Debs), deportation, subversion(cointelpro), blacklisting(Dalton Trumbo), and more acts of oppression like forbidding the flying of the Bolshevik flag.

      Even school children were punished for not saying the pledge of allegiance.

      Only a few percent of their population were Communists, and they nonetheless dominated over a hundred million of their countrymen. They invented the GULAG.

      Gulags were actually implemented under the Russian Tsars, they just called them Katorga. And of course, the idea of deportation to the colonies existed in Great Britain (Australia, the Americas), and even older examples like the Babylonian Captivity exist.

    14. Re:RIP by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      GHWB killed JFK.
      Serious as a heart attack.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    15. Re:RIP by DaFallus · · Score: 2

      That is the most retarded....... If I accuse everyone in a room of being a dick sucking homosexual, statistically I'll be right 15% of the time.. Yeah, that's the exact same logic you just used, asshole.

      Cast a wide enough net.....

      Actually, you'd be right about 4% of the time, if we're just talking about homosexuals. If you're talking about male homosexuals, probably only about 2% of the time.

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
  2. A reason to respect him by koavf · · Score: 3, Informative

    Tho you can say a lot of things good and bad about him, I will always respect how he stood by Dan Quayle as his running mate, essentially knowing it would cost him the election. Any other snark or criticism aside (and there is plenty, sure) I think that speaks a lot to his character.

    1. Re:A reason to respect him by drnb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ross Perot cost him the election, not Quayle.

    2. Re:A reason to respect him by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dan Quayle? The man who spoke out against single mothers? Remember when Murphy Brown stopped her hit TV show, broke character, and spoke directly to him and all the misogynist bigots just like him, vigorously defending single mothers?

      History judges such people harshly.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:A reason to respect him by drnb · · Score: 2

      Total myth. Perot "took" votes from Democrats as well as Republicans, and Clinton was passing Bush when Perot dropped out of the race before dropping back in.

      Perot took more from conservatives. Conservatives includes some democrats, democrats that were more inclined to support a Reason or Bush than a Carter, Mondale or Clinton. There were once these strange creatures called conservative democrats and moderate republicans that leaned conservative on defense and public safety but leaned liberal on social and civil rights.

      Polls don't mean crap, especially in such timeframes as between Perot's exit and return.

      Perot gave us Clinton. Nader gave us Bush Jr. Sanders gave us Trump.

    4. Re:A reason to respect him by gtall · · Score: 2

      Pence is a carbon copy of Quayle with better media handlers...although I tend to think Pence is more of an evangelical nutjob than Quayle.

    5. Re:A reason to respect him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dan Quayle? The man who spoke out against single mothers? Remember when Murphy Brown stopped her hit TV show, broke character, and spoke directly to him and all the misogynist bigots just like him, vigorously defending single mothers?

      History judges such people harshly.

      There is nothing wrong with single mothers (or fathers) /per se/, but it's not something that should be encouraged or looked on as an ideal situation. At the time that is how I interpreted his message (regardless of what he did or did not actually intend).

    6. Re:A reason to respect him by misexistentialist · · Score: 2

      You mean Candace Bergen, who waited until she was married to a millionaire before having a child, and then married another millionaire after he died? "History" is just a story, truth is always the truth.

    7. Re:A reason to respect him by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Total myth. Perot "took" votes from Democrats as well as Republicans

      He took equally from Democrats and Republicans. But the Democrats that voted for Ross were from the centrist "pro-business" wing of the party, and many of them would have drifted to Bush in a two person race.

      The Republicans that voted for Ross were those steamed about Bush's reversal on taxes. They would have never voted for Bill Clinton.

    8. Re:A reason to respect him by Yosho · · Score: 2

      In other words: the family is almost dead. Is it good or bad? Does not matter. It's inevitable because destruction of the family reflects the current economic basis of society: post-industrial society with consumer economics.

      "The family" is very much still alive. The concept you have idealized in your head is simply no longer accepted as the only type of family. Families with divorced parents are not "broken," and you demonizing them does nothing to help.

      I, for one, will not mourn the loss of children growing up in households where mommy and daddy are constantly angry and fighting with each other just because it's socially unacceptable for them to go their separate ways.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    9. Re:A reason to respect him by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      Perot was responsible. Bush had it in the bag as recently as just before the Democratic convention. Then Perot drops out the day Clinton is to give his acceptance speech, saying the Democtratic party is invigorated, so all eyes turn to Clinton that night to see what he will say.

      Later he jumps back in to seal the deal.

      Perot didn't want to win. He wanted Bush to lose. God only knows why but when Bush was CIA director and Perot helped bail out the NYSE in the 1970s, the sky is the limit.

      Continue with your fantasy if you like, but US history is rife with split tickets causing the main guy of that party to lose. 1912, or 2000 with a very minor split ticket.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  3. "Read My Lips...." by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He was famous for saying, "Read my lips, no new taxes." and then raising taxes. Awful liar.

    In retrospect, that was a fairly harmless lie compared to what's come since.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:"Read My Lips...." by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and then raising taxes. Awful liar

      Not raised on his initiative or by his choice. At least he didn't promise that every family would save $2500 on their health insurance in order to ram a massive new tax through.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:"Read My Lips...." by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He was famous for saying, "Read my lips, no new taxes." and then raising taxes. Awful liar.

      This lie, more than anything else, is why he lost in 1992. All politicians lie, but his promise of "no new taxes" was the core of his campaign. This promise was pretty much the only thing he ran on, and he repeated it over and over. Then he won, and immediately abandoned it.

    3. Re:"Read My Lips...." by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nonsense... he has that southern drawl that makes him difficult to understand.

      If you understand redneck fluently (6 years in Florida helped me learn), he clearly said "Read my lips. No new taxis"

      And he stood by that 10000%, no matter where I traveled during that era within the US, there wasn't a single new taxi in service. They were falling apart left and right and I believe he double downed on his promise because I'm pretty sure he made it so that absolutely no service would be performed on those taxis either.

      I've always though that was unfair of people to falsely interpret his speech impediment to mean taxes instead of taxis.

      Golf carts on the other hand, they're not really taxis, so those did receive lots of updates.

    4. Re:"Read My Lips...." by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      He chose to sign the bill. What a president signs, a president owns. If he'd been a little smarter about it, he could have vetoed it the first time and then let it pass into law without his signature - and gotten a second term.

    5. Re:"Read My Lips...." by beachmike · · Score: 2

      True, 0bama was the worst liar of ANY president.

    6. Re:"Read My Lips...." by Solandri · · Score: 3, Informative

      Civics 101: The President doesn't make the budget. The President suggests a budget, but ultimately it's Congress who gets to decide what does or doesn't make it into the budget. The President only gets to sign or veto the whole thing as one lump sum. He can't excise the parts of it he doesn't like while keeping the rest.

      The Democrats controlled both branches of Congress during his Presidency, and insisted the budget should have a tax increase. Bush refused to sign it to the point where the government went into shutdown. But he ultimately decided stopping the shutdown from further harming the economy was more important than keeping his promise, so he blinked and signed. The Democrats won, got their tax increase, and managed to dump the blame for it on Bush.

      The more you know...

  4. Why is this story here? by kenh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, there isn't even a hint of a tech or geek angle to post this story on slashdot.

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:Why is this story here? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

      The nukes on Irak required some tech.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:Why is this story here? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Seriously, there isn't even a hint of a tech or geek angle to post this story on slashdot.

      GHWB lived most of his life before computers or the Internet were widespread, but he wore glasses, was socially inept, and few women found him attractive. I always felt he was a geek in his heart, the "Calvin Coolidge" of his time. In many ways, he was "one of us".

    3. Re:Why is this story here? by drnb · · Score: 2

      GHWB was an accomplished athlete, a collegiate level athlete.
      GHWB believed in duty and responsibility, not entitlement, he used his father's power and influence to get into a combat unit.
      GHWB had the social grace and interpersonal skills to successfully interact with others, even others from different nations and different cultures and who had very different belief systems than he did.

      In short he was very little like "us", "us" being the slashdot community in general. Not performing well for the TV cameras is hardly evidence that he was one of "us".

  5. Re:Comparisons and policies... by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And we'll be paying for Clinton's balanced budget for decades to come. We'll pay for Reagan's mass deflation of currency forever. We'll pay for Obama's limp dicked social healthcare which started as "Healthcare for all" to a piece of paper that said "Affordable Healthcare Act" and really meant "There's nothing left in here from the original policy and we've let every politician in America earmark the shit of it. Oklahoma can no declare black people as aliens and teach creationism as science. But at least I passed my bill".

    Rule #1 : If you think you're the right person to represent hundreds of millions of people with hundreds of millions of different and generally conflicting needs. You probably should be shot before entering office.

    Rule #2 : If you need to associate with a political party who will sell you a chance at the presidency in return for what few drops of your soul you have left... you should not run for president.

    Rule #3 : If you are either a conservative or a liberal... you can not represent people fairly. You should not be allowed to run for present.

    Rule #4 : If you actually become president and when midterms come around you're supporting only one political party or worse... you're supporting a political party instead of the merits of the individual candidates... you should be burned on a cross.

    Please don't pretend like one president is better than the next. The system specifically permits only bankers and lawyers and oilmen into the office. They are people who like to play the game or to represent themselves and their families. After two Bushes and a Trump, American is clearly becoming something of an oligarchy.

    Worse, we see things like Hillary running for office because well if GWB can be president after daddy, then shouldn't she be able to be president after Bill? And the most fucked up thing is, she might have been the most technically qualified presidential candidate we've had since the founding fathers died since she might be the only candidate that actually had real experience running the country because she and Bill were a team. Now, considering that like all other presidents, Bill sucked at the job.. even with her help, I'm not sure if that's a good thing.

    Dukey was a mess. He would have been a lame duck. Nah... he'd have been a limp dick. He was almost as stupid as Al Gore.

    We sit here judging US presidents as though we really think there's such a thing as a possibility of having a good one. When you have one part of a country who get's their education from the Westboro Baptist Church, another part of the country idolizing and learning from Kim Kardashian, another part rallying for Donald Trump and wearing hats specifically designed to target rednecks, another part like Jamaica Queens NY where there are multiple police officers on every corner all day and night trying to either maintain the peace, simply keep people alive, or beating teenaged kids for carrying a joint... and then close to a hundred million retired people who mostly have burned through their savings that were stored based on 10 years of life after retirement but now everyone is living 20-30 more...

    You know what... I can make a list that sounds like Billy Joel's we didn't start the fire that lists everything from modern day hippies to wall street one per-centers and I would never get close to covering even the smallest portion of America.

    Let's make it simple... GHWB wasn't any worse than the rest of them. When he went to war and he incarcerated people for being poor.... he wasn't being any worse than the rest of them. He was an unqualified person being controlled by an unqualified party voted for by unqualified voters and criticized publicly by unqualified journalists who were trying to make a buck by turning The New York Times into just another tabloid like the rest of them with bold and shocking headlines.

    Guess what... bold shocking headlines aren't bold or shocking when you've shocked everyone so much that no one gives a shit anymore. If the Post

  6. Re:He was definitely a classier man than Reagan or by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Set the stage for the 2003 homicide spree in Iraq (Gulf War II).

    No he didn't. He very eloquently and clearly explained why "going to Baghdad" would have been a supremely stupid thing to do in 1991. Everything he said applied just as much in 2003.

    It is not his fault that his son was a moron.

  7. Re:Comparisons and policies... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    You ignore the Democrats had the majority in the senate (the only reason it was passed) and the Senate version was the bill passed. Just a handful of Republican amendments; it was mostly a creation of the Democrats, and they own it's consequences to this day.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  8. Re:He was definitely a classier man than Reagan or by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Homicide spree? You mean Obama's drone campaign? He murdered more children than any other Nobel peace prize winner. Remember when he bombed a Doctors Without Borders hospital and then sent gunners in to murder the fleeing doctors and patients? This was 2015. Don't pretend you don't remember.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  9. Re:Comparisons and policies... by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

    He's only viewed with rose-colored glasses because the current vulgarian is so awful.

    He handled the end of the Soviet Union really well (even sending $1biilon to the former enemy). His team handled the end of the El Salvador civil war with (especially in retrospect) surprising skill. He also committed to "full enforcement" of the Anti-Apartheid Act in South Africa (unlike the Reagan administration). In many his foreign policy was great (and again, in retrospect, he made the right decision to not conquer Iraq).

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  10. Re:Still? by quenda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    highly doubtful you respected him while he was president.

    A *whole* lot of people who claim to respect him now were claiming he was hitler at the time.

    Kind of like Trump now...

    No. Bush I had an average approval rating of 61% in office, as high as 89%.
    Guess what Trump's approval rating is?
    No, lower.... lower still ... keep going ...

  11. 5,000 casualties, not worth it ... by drnb · · Score: 4, Informative

    Tell me again how he deserves respect?

    During the first Gulf War, when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait and Saudi Arabia(*):
    Generals: Estimated casualties to take Bagdhad and remove Saddam Hussein, 5,000 US troops.
    President HW Bush: Not worth it. End the war. Kicking the Iraqis back to their own country was our mission, not regime change.

    (*) Yes Saudi Arabia too, Battle of Kafji. 3 Iraqi divisions invaded, stopped by US Marines and Rangers and a hell of a lot of air support.

    1. Re:5,000 casualties, not worth it ... by drnb · · Score: 4, Informative

      The conspiracy theory based upon the ambiguous communique ignores that face to face meetings with the ambassador where Saddam was repeatedly warned not to invade Kuwait. Plus there is the whole 6 months of military build up and being told to leave Kuwait that also preceded the war.

  12. Re:Comparisons and policies... by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Just a handful of Republican amendments; it was mostly a creation of the Democrats"

    Republicans added 161 amendments to the bill, then refused to vote on it. It was based on the Heritage Foundations earlier proposal (including the hated mandate).

    One hell of a handful there.

    --
    Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
  13. Re:Still? by Rockoon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Guess what Trump's approval rating is?

    More than the new speaker for the Democrats?

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  14. Re:took the nation to war by Uberbah · · Score: 3, Informative

    That Iraqi troops were throwing babies out of incubators in Kuwatti hospitals, for one. There wasn't much enthusiasm for a military intervention until a teenage girl got on television and told that little fable - of course she was the daughter of an ambassador and was no where near the invasion or any clinics.

  15. Jumping out of the burning plane ... by drnb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Go jump out of an airplane over the Pacific and let us know how much kinship you feel you vicarious-living charade.

    Jumping out of a plane going down in flames isn't really the accomplishment. Flying a perfectly good airplane to the island that is heavily defended and known to be commanded by someone who beheads captured pilots and practices ritualistic cannibalism is the accomplishment.

  16. Re:Still? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Trump is the first US president in modern times to never get above 45%. That can still change, but smart money says it won't.

  17. Re:He was definitely a classier man than Reagan or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Set the stage for the 2003 homicide spree in Iraq (Gulf War II).

    No he didn't. He very eloquently and clearly explained why "going to Baghdad" would have been a supremely stupid thing to do in 1991. Everything he said applied just as much in 2003.

    It is not his fault that his son was a moron.

    His son was not the reason why Dick Chaney and corporate America made it a priority to invade Iraq instead of going after Pakistan and the Taliban. At the time Sadam was continuing to manage to ship oil on the sly to Asia and work in conjunction with Pakistan to develop strategic nukes. If Sadam had managed things better then things might have been different, he would not have been caught with his pants down and might have even clobbered the shit out of Dick Chaney and company if he had taken the help that was offered to him on the sly by China and some of the disaffected crowds in Russia. That is why Chaney was in such a hurry to take out Sadam, he was starting to effect the worlds oil supply again and was slowly building up support in Asia and Russia that would soon have made it impossible for the US to control.

    No the second gulf war was a war to make certain that oil would only flow to China largely through companies approved by the real oil cartels which are run by the major corporations. Chaney made certain that the big payoff for the US in undertaking the second Gulf war was the sudden dominance in world wide oil patch industries by Halliburton. In Canada Halliburton then swallowed up all sorts of major corps like Schlumberger and the like as a direct result of all the cash they were paid to do the logistics of the second Gulf war. In case you are interested at the time Canada started to ship more oil to the US than any other country or region on earth so the US was not that interested in how Iraq oil effected the world market only that Sadam would stop making his money from it.

    The Bush era was and is the era of big oil and the consequences of not diversifying the energy economy fast enough in the US. This is the real legacy of the Bush presidencies, the inability to wean the US off fossil fuels quickly enough. GM and others have finally seen the writing on the wall, as does anyone with half a brain except the petro chemical industry which still runs the United States and far to much of the worlds economy. The legacy of the Republican party and the petrochemical industry in the US is what history will remember the most about the Bush family. And the fact that the oil industry controlled the presidency of the US and led the world down the path to what has is essentially corporate despotism culminating in the presidency of the complete moron puppet that is now in power.

  18. Re:took the nation to war by ph1ll · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well documented propaganda, I'm afraid.

    Fake news ain't new.

    --
    --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
  19. He chose Big Oil over the world's future by Misagon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    George H.W. Bush was instrumental in undermining the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro ... and then bullshitting about it, calling the US a "global leader" for the climate in a speech.
    After having got a letter from his buddy Ken Lay at Enron before the event, he made sure sure that the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change's mandatory emission cuts were replaced with voluntary measures. He also got it changed that developing nations would be exempt. For many nations, including the US -- the world's biggest polluter -- this meant no change at all. Also, that China -- then (and for some inexplicable reason, still ) classified as a "developing nation" could increase its emissions.

    Greenpeace called him a "environmental degenerate" and a "highway robber".
    It has been said by many researchers that have looked back, that if it hadn't been for Bush in '92, the world's climate would have been in a much better state than now.

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:He chose Big Oil over the world's future by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, look, Greenpeace is infuriated at something. How unusual.

      Just checking, is this the same Greenpeace that slandered genetically modified foods? Why yes it is!

      "More than 100 Nobel Prize winners in physics, chemistry, medicine and other sciences this week signed a blistering letter attacking Greenpeace's "fact-challenged propaganda campaign against innovations in agricultural biotechnology."

      "Greenpeace and their allies have claimed falsely that GMOS are dangerous, untested and inadequately regulated," the letter states. "But the science telling us GM crops and foods are safe has been confirmed by vast experience."

      The letter goes on to point out that "As we have shown elsewhere, we know that GMOS are at least as safe as crops produced with other breeding methods. The only time a safety difference has been found the GMOs have been safer."

      Worse, the latest target of Greenpeace's anti-GMO campaign is a type of rice â" called Golden Rice â" that would "reduce or eliminate much of the death and disease caused by vitamin A deficiency, which has the greatest impact on the poorest people in Africa and Southeastern Asia."

      Greenpeace, mind you, is the same organization that thinks "climate change denial" is a crime worth prosecuting.

      To show just how truly muddle-headed Greenpeace is, a recent study published in the prestigious scientific journal Nature found that the use of GMOs can help fight climate change by cutting methane emissions. Which means Greenpeace's anti-science GMO stance trumps its allegedly pro-science climate-change fanaticism.

      Greenpeace isn't alone on the left-wing fringes here.

      A Pew Research Center survey found, for example, that just over a third of Democrats think GMOs are safe to eat. Translation: two-thirds of Democrats are anti-science."

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:He chose Big Oil over the world's future by hey! · · Score: 2

      Detailed economic data on China as a whole is hard to come by, but the median wage in Shenzen and Shanghai is comparable to that of Croatia, about $1000/month. A college graduate in China can expect to make ab out 4000 yuan/month, about $574.

      China's immense economic power comes from sheer scale. On a per capita GDP basis China is considerably poorer than Croatia; it's poorer than Gabon. Those recent college graduates may only be slightly better off than their compatriots, but there's a lot of them. In fact one in five college students in the world is in China.

      This is similar to India; India's median and per capita income is 30x lower than the US, but about 2% of the population would be middle class by US standards. That's 27 million people, more than the entire population of Australia.

      These are countries with immense power and immense problems to match.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  20. Re:He was definitely a classier man than Reagan or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The US basically tricked Iraq into invading Kuwait. Kuwait was pumping oil from Iraqi oil fields (horizontal drilling). When they refused to stop, Saddam Hussein met with American diplomats to ask if the US would have any problem with an Iraqi military action against Kuwait. The US told him that it wouldn't be a problem since we don't get involved in regional conflicts.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Glaspie

  21. Re:He helped kill Kennedy by MrKaos · · Score: 2

    The allegation being that it was done under the direction of Lyndon B. Johnson and collaboration of Allen W. Dulles, CIA director 1953–1961 who hated Kennedy while H.W Bush was serving in the CIA at the time of Kennedy's assassination.

    Who knows what the truth is? The truth is that our reality has been fuzzed for decades now by our own media and politicians that we've been conditioned to respond to any information that challenges the status quo with the words "Conspiracy Theory" despite knowing that we are being lied to constantly.

    Most of us here wern't even alive back then which shows how practiced the lies are.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  22. Re:He was definitely a classier man than Reagan or by stud9920 · · Score: 2

    It is not his fault that his son was a moron.

    isn't the moral thing to do to public tell your son is a moron, if he's about to cause a war?

  23. Re:Reelect Em All by shess · · Score: 2

    No term limits and all the politician cares about is re-election. Trump has spent more time campaigning and golfing than being the President in his first 2 years.

    You say that like it's a bad thing. On evidence, I'd prefer him to spend less time being President, but unfortunately the consequence is that it delegates authority to mostly unelected actors.

  24. Re:Tribute by hey! · · Score: 2

    Yes it should.

    People don't want what they think they want. They think they want a leader who will do the right vs. the expedient thing. But they'll punish leaders who actually do this. Bush was one of those old-school people who thought debt was a real problem for a country. Raising taxes after promising not to was political suicide, but whether or not it was the right thing to do, he thought it was.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  25. Re:He was definitely a classier man than Reagan or by mapkinase · · Score: 2

    No. Moron is what we have now. Bush Jr was of the same caliber as Obama: establishment stooge.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.