Slashdot Mirror


Trump Agrees Not To Raise Tariff Levels on Chinese Goods; China Agrees To US Purchases. Two Sides To Start Broader Negotiations. (wsj.com)

U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed Saturday to keep their trade war from escalating with a promise to temporarily halt the imposition of new tariffs [the link may be paywalled; alternative source], as the world's two largest economies negotiate a lasting agreement. China also agreed to further market opening, its foreign minister said. In a statement, White House said the U.S. had agreed not to increase tariffs on Chinese goods to 25% on Jan. 1. From a report: The truce between the U.S. and China emerged after a highly anticipated dinner Saturday between Trump and Xi on the sidelines of the Group of 20 summit in Argentina. The leaders agreed to stop the introduction of new tariffs and intensify their trade talks, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told reporters hours later in Buenos Aires. The White House called the meeting "highly successful," saying the U.S. will leave existing tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods at 10 percent and refrain from raising that rate to 25 percent as planned on Jan. 1. In exchange, the U.S. wants an immediate start to talks on Trump's biggest complaints about Chinese trade practices: intellectual property theft, non-tariff barriers and cyber theft. After 90 days, if there's no progress on structural reform, the U.S. will raise those tariffs to 25 percent, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement. China also agreed to boost its purchases of agricultural and industrial goods to reduce its trade imbalance with the U.S., she said.

322 comments

  1. WINNING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    So much winning, you're going to be TIRED of winning!

  2. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He didn't cave. Current tariffs remain in place. Only the increase to 25% in January has been suspended pending further negotiations on IP theft and non-tariff barriers to trade. Overall, this is a pretty good outcome, and hopefully remaining issues can be resolved, and the existing tariffs can be lifted as well.

    TFA is paywalled. Here is an alternative article.

  3. Re:And we all know what a Chinese promise is worth by OppMan29 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    well if nothing happens in 90 days he can raise tariffs ...nothing lost...

  4. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Of course he DID cave by limiting his hand, and of course he could not really possibly have already removed the tariffs by now anyway so using that as evidence he didn't cave is typical Shanghai dishonesty again.

  5. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No he did not.

  6. Why would China agree to anything in good faith? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    If I were the Chinese, I would stall the process as long as possible. Trump may not make it to the next election and even if he does he may not win. The Chinese leadership is not responsible to the people of China which means they can do things that would get a president impeached or voted out. The Chinese are playing the long game and the USA is playing the short game. I am routing for the USA but it seems to me they may have already lost. I sure hope I'm wrong.

  7. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Call it a hole in the ground, call it a snow fort, call it The Art of the Deal (a book written by someone else) - but don't call it caving, Trump will tweet nasty things about you within seconds."
       

  8. This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by bogaboga · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The White House called the meeting "highly successful," saying the U.S. will leave existing tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods at 10 percent and refrain from raising that rate to 25 percent as planned on Jan. 1. In exchange, the U.S. wants an immediate start to talks on Trump's biggest complaints about Chinese trade practices: intellectual property theft, non-tariff barriers and cyber theft. After 90 days, if there's no progress on structural reform, the U.S. will raise those tariffs to 25 percent, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement. China also agreed to boost its purchases of agricultural and industrial goods to reduce its trade imbalance with the U.S., she said.

    And with this news, the Democrats will water down this achievement while fuming in their "war rooms" at the same time.

    That, I can guarantee.

    1. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh for fucks sake, the damage is done. How many jobs were lost already because of this bullshit tradewar.

      The damage is done, and it's going to take a long while for us to recover. Companies aren't going to hire back those people, and they are certainly not going to lower prices on stuff.

    2. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reposted from above - So 90 days of caving, then another round of _____? Sounds like North Korea policy, Russia policy, Saudi Arabia policy, etc. He'll be out of office in 90 days maybe!

      Where's the plan, beefbrains?

    3. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by meglon · · Score: 1

      Once again, the problem with all of this is you and the rest of Trumps dick sucking team are complete fucking idiots.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    4. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'll teach us for trying to play fair! Everybody knows that the US cannot enact tariffs, only everybody else gets to! As Liberals, we hate this country SO much and want to see it fail more than anything! Fucking Trump.

    5. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, they agreed to talk about talking, and they have a vague agrement that China will buy more stuff. Where exactly is the achievement?

    6. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by phantomfive · · Score: 0

      How many jobs were lost already because of this bullshit tradewar. The damage is done, and it's going to take a long while for us to recover.

      That's a good question, how many jobs were lost? I'd like to see an analysis of that.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh for fucks sake, the damage is done. How many jobs were lost already because of this bullshit tradewar.

      Unemployment rate doesn't seem affected... so I'd say - none?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    8. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With employment rates at record levels, I don't think any jobs have been lost.

    9. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      Those aren't war rooms, they're Starbucks.

    10. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's fairly obvious you don't read your own links, retard lol.

      Saturday, December 1, 2018 10:53 PM
      The database is currently unavailable.
      Your request was invalid for this Data Access Service. Please attempt other data requests. Thank you for using LABSTAT.

    11. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vulgarity. Nice! You are a very classy guy.

      Maybe you hate Trump because he's just like you.

    12. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That data takes about 3-6-9-12 months to be adequately tabulated and digested usually. Trump will be out of office by then most likely.

    13. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Oh for fucks sake, the damage is done. How many jobs were lost already because of this bullshit tradewar.

      Unemployment rate doesn't seem affected... so I'd say - none?

      I mean, the percent of the civilization population employed is still less than the two decades between 1987 and 2008. So, is the unemployment rate really that low, are are the chronically unemployed just no longer counted as in the labor force. Hint, you have to go back to the mid-1970's to get a population with less participation in the labor force...

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    14. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      That's a good question, how many jobs were lost? I'd like to see an analysis of that.

      Likely near zero. The Chinese retaliatory tariffs were mostly on farm products: soybeans, corn, wheat.

      But the tariffs were imposed after the crops were planted in the Spring of 2018, and have now been repealed before next year's spring planting. So they made little practical difference to production or employment.

      The steel and aluminum tariffs likely cost more jobs, but those had little to do with China, which exports little steel or aluminum to America (except in finished goods), and mainly affected that great national security threat to our north: Canada.

    15. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with tariffs is that can be large, short-term, and drastic in scope (hence the short-term), or they can be small, long-term, and drastic in scope (hence they eventually get repealed). As a bargaining tool, they're almost always something that makes the situation worse for those pushing the tariffs both by creating increased prices but also by morphing industries into expecting that windfall to last. One could readily point at the big three auto industry as a prime example of this.

      At its core, though, I don't believe for a second that the Chinese government has the power to make the sort of structural reforms that will meaningful change the issue of intellectual property or cyber theft not only in the scope of 90 days but in the scope of decades. One of the fundamental problems with China is its corruption and that hinges heavily on granting connected government officials in a position that they're able to take advantage of that corruption. Attempts to crack down too harshly on those more loosely connected would have pretty devastating blowback from those enshrined in money and a desire to call out the Communist Party for what it is.

      Would it be enough to unthrown the Communist Party? I tend to doubt it. But I also tend to believe that there's a lot less control and a lot more chaos than the Chinese government tends to let on. Nominally it is ignored because it doesn't threaten their power. But there are definitely things the rich could do to threaten their power, and they have absolutely no desire to end their gravy train nor do they lack the ability to leave the country and be above the influence yet influence their countrymen. I almost would darkly say, China could learn a lot from Russia and its own methods of suppression which have been far more effective.

    16. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Full hit isn;tthere yet, but fucking GM just said they would cut 15,000 job. 15000!. Thanks to tariffs on steel. Are we winning yet?

    17. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      So what makes you think that these tariffs increased unemployment? That's the question I was answering - what data do you have that says the tariffs have increased unemployment?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    18. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If they're such idiots, how'd they get China to back down? You think maybe for once you could cheer for a victory for America instead of partisan viciousness? You're dividing us and making us fight with one another - exactly what Putin wants.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    19. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're too dumb to look for it, agreed. It also tends to come out a quarter after the quarter you're in, MORON lol. Go ask your Dad, you know nothing about this.

    20. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      What was achieved is that China has learned the value of a country throwing its economic weight around, just as Russia learned the value of nuclear weapons in 1945.

      Are these really the lessons we want to be teaching the rest of the world?

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    21. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a lying faggot BIll, your integrity is likely near zero if not imaginary, and in your own mind only. Your disgusting tapdancing as people lose their jobs over this just lets us know what kind of a faggot you really are.

      I hope you suffer so you understand what that's like.

    22. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU MORON. All they bought was a 90 day breather to find new ways to manipulate Trump, find new angles, or watch as Mueller carves him up like a Turkey. You truly are an idiot backing a lying feckless cunt. I pity you.

    23. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what makes you think that these tariffs increased unemployment?

      A basic grasp of economics.

    24. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      I don't believe for a second that the Chinese government has the power to make the sort of structural reforms that will meaningful change the issue of intellectual property or cyber theft

      The world does not revolve around you belief system.

      Development is a wonderful thing. The Chinese have already decided that Intellectual Property protection is in their best interest, now they have a lot of their own Intellectual Property to protect.

      At best, Trump is going to gain credit for the already-happened.

      Attempts to crack down on the communist party? You do realise that, since 1970, the percentage of Chinese below the poverty line has gone from 85% to 8.5%*! There is no clamour to overthrow them, nor likely to be in the foreseeable future. However, Chinese production costs are likely to rise, and demand for imported goods will also. The Chinese know well they have more dollars than is good for them, but what is less clear is whether the Chinese people want Gangsta Rap and Hollywood movies. America does not export much else.

      * By 2020, American poverty will probably go from 8.5% to 85% - especially if you don't dump Trump.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    25. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Unemployment rate doesn't seem affected... so I'd say - none?

      The unemployment rate measures employment, not specific jobs. It also measures into the past not taking into account anything in the future. All those GM plants that are closing? Yeah they aren't in your unemployment rate. That Harley Davidson plant that won't be built in the USA? That's not in the unemployment rate. Desperate people taking jobs as janitors after they lost their better paying jobs in manufacturing? That's not in your unemployment rate.

      The only conclusion you can draw is that unemployment is low. Since this statistic is completely unchanged you can use this statistic in any way to talk about the affect of the trade war on jobs. There is no causation, and nothing in the data to correlate.

    26. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh for fucks sake, the damage is done. How many jobs were lost already because of this bullshit tradewar.

      Unemployment rate doesn't seem affected... so I'd say - none?

      To an extent the insane, unneeded, unpaid for stimulus is likely offsetting some losses.

      The better question is what is the average unemployment over the period it takes to return the debt back to where it was. That is a much harder question, since you have to face the consequences of everything. Sooner or later there will be another downturn. There always is. At that point we will be in much worse shape and the downturn is likely to last longer and be worse than it would have been.

    27. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Are we talking taking the debt back down to ~$20 trillion, when President Trump took office, or ~$10 trillion, when President Obama took office? How far back? Back to the last time we actually paid down the debt?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    28. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      GM says the cuts will save $6 billion a year. That's $480,000 per job. Yeah - GM has other issues if each job costs them $40,000 per month...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    29. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      So how many jobs were lost due to the tariffs? GM claims they will say $6 billion per year with the cuts of 14,000 people - that's about $480,000 per employee. Clearly there is some funny accounting going on there... If it was the tariffs, why isn't Ford, or Chrysler laying people off as well? So just how many jobs were lost from the tariffs?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    30. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we talking taking the debt back down to ~$20 trillion, when President Trump took office, or ~$10 trillion, when President Obama took office? How far back? Back to the last time we actually paid down the debt?

      The amount when he took office is appropriate, since the damage he did would be undone. Of course presidents are supposed to fix damage, not just undo it, but well if we are talking Trump's share, that is the number.

      Obama inherited the tax mess Bush created and _didn't_ fix it. Obama did have a recession to deal with, so he at least had that as a reason. Trump had a good economy. There was no excuse to cut taxes, mostly on the wealthy and big businesses to spur growth that wasn't needed.

      Still, to be fair, you would have to take both W Bush and Obama's terms and project them into the future until that debt is paid, since they are linked, with the major revenue drop occurring during W Bush.

      Now when the next recession hits, we are pretty much fucked.

      The problem Obama had was the republicans weren't willing to do their jobs once they got power. He would have signed a reasonable bill that addressed revenue, but he never got one. He did what he could.

    31. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world does not revolve around you belief system.

      It's not my "belief system" but my beliefs, and of course my beliefs could be incorrect. Similarly, yours could be.

      Development is a wonderful thing. The Chinese have already decided that Intellectual Property protection is in their best interest, now they have a lot of their own Intellectual Property to protect.

      That's part of my point. It's been over a decade since "the Chinese government'* has realized the value of IP, but they still willfully support violating IP from other countries and do very little to protect Chinese IP inside the country. I can see the latter being something they have more of a desire to crack down on, yet clearly they're having very little effect.

      At best, Trump is going to gain credit for the already-happened.

      That's how most head-of-state politics works: policy changes might take years for the actual effect to occur or the government often has so very little control over the fluctuations that do occur.

      Attempts to crack down on the communist party? You do realise that, since 1970, the percentage of Chinese below the poverty line has gone from 85% to 8.5%*! There is no clamour to overthrow them, nor likely to be in the foreseeable future.

      Realize, I never said I believe there's any real probability of an overthrow. But a lot of the very wealthiest people in China suddenly being told then forced to end the foundation of their corruption is likely to have a ripple effect on society. Many would need to be arrested. Many would flee the country with their wealth. Those lower in the ranks would continue to engage in IP theft, observing how profitable it is and how ineffective the Chinese government is at actually stopping IP theft. I imagine it would create more infighting. If the Chinese government would move even further, then even those people would be targets and a lot of fear and chaos would result when people engaging in other illegal corruption would come to realize they too could be the next target. People in general are gun-ho about that economic progress when they think they can advance themselves, and if corruption isn't a way, a lot of people may rebel in their own way.

      However, Chinese production costs are likely to rise, and demand for imported goods will also. The Chinese know well they have more dollars than is good for them, but what is less clear is whether the Chinese people want Gangsta Rap and Hollywood movies. America does not export much else.

      Chinese production costs have risen for years, along with wages, as the demand for competent workers have constantly increased. And what America has best to export is both food and heavy [farming] equipment, the latter of which precisely because we have the IP on a lot of it. I think it funny your stereotype of America ignores precisely what China agreed to buy even though it's precisely the sort of thing China has reason to buy.

      * By 2020, American poverty will probably go from 8.5% to 85% - especially if you don't dump Trump.

      That's simply absurd. Even during the Great Depression there wasn't such a radical shift. Honestly, I think you're heavily understating China's poverty numbers regardless. Admittedly there has been a drastic improvement in the economic level of many Chinese, but poverty is not something that is so easy to effectively make disappear or appear.

      * What the Chinese government believes is often different than what the majority of Chinese believe. And what the Chinese government says is often very different from what they believe. Further, the actions of the Chinese government are often bound to what they believe they can effectively do, as trying to achieve the impossible would embarrass them greatly and substantially undermine their power.

    32. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      That's the question I was answering

      No, you were being snide about the unemployment rate, and using that as an argument. And when I pointed out the flaws in that one number, you shifted the goalpost.

      So what makes you think that these tariffs increased unemployment?

      You mean other than basic economics?

      • 12 billion activated by Trump in emergency "you lost your job due to government action" fund.
      • All the stories of manufacturers shutting down/slowing down due to steel tariffs (e.g. GM just laid of 15,000 workers)
      • No expansion of domestic steel workers to counteract it

      Your turn, how have they increased jobs?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    33. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Obama had a filibuster-proof majority in Congress for about half of his first term. Democrats controlled everything. He did nothing except up the amount of deficit spending. And then stated that "2% GDP and 6% unemployment is the new normal - get used to it".

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    34. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This problem was one caused by Trump in the first place. Previous presidents did not address the smaller issues because of the need to guide the US through it's depression.

    35. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $12b? The fed printed almost a trillion a year for six years to prop up Obama. This sounds like a Good Deal. Basic economics.

    36. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by ChatHuant · · Score: 1

      If they're such idiots, how'd they get China to back down?

      But China didn't back down - at least not yet. At the moment it's all words, and even those don't appear to address the most important issues: mandatory Chinese majority ownership for companies trying to trade in China, mandatory transfer of intellectual property to the Chinese part and complete lack of enforcement of intellectual property laws against copycat Chinese companies. I reserve my judgement on the matter until I see concrete results - especially on those issues.

      This is a pattern for Trump. He comes in all blustery, calls various dictators and criminals "good guys", gets a bunch of mostly empty promises or some meaningless changes, then boasts on Twitter about his amazing successes and drops the issue. He has no followup, and no attention span. See North Korea. He got a bunch of words, preened before the cameras, agreed to cancel the South Korea-USA joint exercises, then forgot the whole thing. In the meantime, North Korea has dismantled their old nuclear testing site at Punggye-ri (which was due for closing anyway), then got right back at their tricks. North Korea cancelled the November 7 meeting with Pompeo, and now got the USA to agree not to require a complete list of nuclear weapons and missile sites from North Korea prior to next year's summit (according to Mike Pence's Nov 15 interview with NBC). I believe there is a high chance that the China thing will go the same way.

    37. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I don't have a number. I only pointed out the fault in using unemployment figures as part of your argument. Just as I will do now in this argument: Different companies are differently exposed various macro-economic changes. Just because Ford and Chrysler aren't laying off people doesn't mean the GM decision wasn't driven by tariffs. May I remind you that you just compared a company that needed a bail out in the USA to a company which didn't? By your same reasoning there was no automotive industry crisis in 2008.

    38. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      So it's quite possible that there were no jobs lost due to the tariffs. In other words - a lot of angst about a lot of possibilities, and precious few facts.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    39. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      So it's quite possible that there were no jobs lost due to the tariffs.

      Except for those where companies have announced plant closures directly citing the tariffs you'd be right.

    40. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is simply playing the same game the US did with the UK. For 200 years we thumbed our noses at UK and Continental patent and copyrights until the 20th century. It wasn't until the 1910s-1940s that we started enforcing an 'international consensus'. Once the Chinese growth and development is saturated then they will come to the table of an international rules based order. But, there are more people in Asia than there are people in the rest of the world, so they have a long time to build up their 'Sphere of Influence' ala the Road and Belt initiative.

      I am not hopeful the the US and Western Markets can 'win' in the long term simply due to Demographic and Population questions.

      If India and China can ever set their differences aside and form a consensus Bloc of their own, the rest of the world is boned.

    41. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then Trump in a single year outdid all eight years of Obama's presidency, debt-wise. With absolutely no way to thwart the looming recession that anyone with a brain knows is coming.

    42. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have high tariffs and farm subsidies going back decades, grow up Republitroll.

    43. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then in the 2nd half of his first term, and the whole of the second term he didnt.
      Face facts. Obama took a terrible economy and turned it around and set it up well for the next guy.
      Trump took a very good economy and fucked it in the ass trying to make it better. (or if you are cynical - He took a very good economy and seized the opportunity to take off some cream for himself and his rich buddies)

    44. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      They cite the tariffs amongst a litany of reasons. Notably GM. Of course, Ford was ahead of the curve, saw the falling US demand for cars (it's skyrocketing for SUVs and trucks) and already cut down its offerings. GM was slow to respond to the market change, and is now fishing about for any reason it can...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    45. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Turmp has yet to have a filibuster proof Senate. Obama didn't do anything about the economy, he claimed 2% GDP growth was the new normal, and we should just get used to 7% unemployment. Somehow he gets to shuffle everything bad off to Bush - but everything good that Trump does goes to him. I guess that's why the markets exploded literally the day after the election - because Obama?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    46. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      In the news today companies that are more at risk due to their business practices are the first affected. That doesn't change the causality, only the mitigating factors. Ford also didn't a bailout during the car crisis, so holding them up as like pointing to a well off royalty and saying: "See rich people are fine, what are poor people complaining about!"

    47. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      Somehow he gets to shuffle everything bad off to Bush - but everything good that Trump does goes to him.

      Not everything bad gets to be shuffled off to Bush -- just what he'd inherited.
      To be honest, Trump hasn't really been in office long enough for us to tell the long-term effects of his presidency on the economy, so I'm not really ready to say economically "he's great" or "he sucks."

      I guess that's why the markets exploded literally the day after the election - because Obama?

      The markets were about the same. The market average has been pretty much a straight line since Jan 2016. The trend really goes back to Feb 2009, with mini-downturns in Aug 2011, Aug 2015, and early Jan 2016 putting on the brakes a bit without changing the overall trajectory of the Dow.

    48. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Today, the stock markets are down over three percent.

      If you're going to give Trump credit for the times it goes up, then be sure to give him the blame for days like today.

    49. Re:This is very good. Double down Mr President.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orange Man Bad

  9. Re: Why would China agree to anything in good fait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because China's credit is on the line. If the don't follow through on their word and treat other nations with respect in a reciprocal manner, why would anyone wish to take them seriously??

  10. Re:And we all know what a Chinese promise is worth by meglon · · Score: 0, Troll

    You're misspelling "republican."

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  11. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reposted from below - So 90 days of caving, then another round of _____? Sounds like North Korea policy, Russia policy, Saudi Arabia policy, etc. He'll be out of office in 90 days maybe!

    Where's the plan, beefbrains? Are we just completely winging it on all things and taking Trump's word for how well it works while people get laid off? FUCK YOU BILL, YOU SHOULD LOSE YOUR JOB APOLOGIST.

    Not the dairy workers, not the soybean farmers or automakers, YOU apologists should be the ones HURT by Trump's IDIOCY. Incredibly, some of you are so thick in the denial, YOU ARE the ones he's hurting!

    But you're not HONEST enough to ADMIT IT. THERE IS NO PLAN. He's been completely WINGING this shit on a bluff and a prayer, and now you think you're going to make it a "victory" over a 90 day cooloff?

    LYING IDIOTS LOL go give some money to Nebraska, YOUR OWN, YOU BITCHES.

  12. Had to be done by leathered · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It has been clear for some time that China's trading relationship with the US and the rest of the western world is not a level playing field. Actively hindering US companies from operating in China, currency manipulation, gaming postal treaties and engaging in rampant IP theft is something that has been tolerated for too long.

    I'm not American and I have no love for Trump but it at least he's attempting to resolve the issue. Obama did nothing and I doubt Clinton would have either.

    --
    For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    1. Re: Had to be done by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Agree 100%. Hopefully, trump will make china open up for all west, not just America.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re: Had to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah China is already bending over for 90 days, they promise. Everything's cool guys! Trust Trump to handle this as well as he handles ... well, not his wife.. not twitter... not the investigation into his collusion with Russians...

      Hm.

      Maybe you're a moron.

    3. Re: Had to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has already been opening up. If Trump ends up doing anything, it will be to slow that opening up down so the Chinese can save face and not look like they caved.
      IP protections were already improving.
      Chinese wages constantly on the rise.
      Currency manipulations a distant memory.
      China relying less and less on manufacturing and more on services.
      Trump just wanted to take credit for things that have been happening since before he even thought about running for President. It's all ego and face saving on both sides.

    4. Re:Had to be done by hackingbear · · Score: 2

      - Chinese tariff levels and ownership restriction are WTO deals they reached with the US and the other developed countries some 20 years ago, in exchange China agreed to things like processing American trash which pollute its environment heavily. If the US didn't like the deal, why did it sign it. One thing I totally agree with President Trump: if we want to blame, we should blame the past US presidents. But why is that China's fault?
      - Chinese currency manipulation is a myth: if you actually live in China for the last 4 decades, you would notice that the government has been trying hard to lift Yuan's rate, without that effort, Yuan would be probably worth as much as Yen. go check the exchange rates of these two currency. So we should actually thank the Chinese government, else Chinese products would be many times cheaper than they are now.
      - Postal treaty? Again China has been admitted as a developing country and so enjoy the lower rate. Given there is no process to re-evaluate their status, why is it China's fault? Is it China still a developing country? That depends on how one defines "developing country". As far as I know, there is no real legal definition. but you can check China's GDP per capita to decide if China is still developing or not.
      - IP theft? The US itself had stolen massively when it was a developing country. And today's China enforce patent laws pretty well. For examples, Chinese patient have to pay extremely high price for western medicine, whereas India produces all the cheap imitate that benefits their population. So at best, this IP theft claim is exaggerated nowaday

    5. Re:Had to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Obama did nothing and I doubt Clinton would have either.

      That's false. The Trans Pacific Partnership was designed to reign in China's influence in many ways. Trump shit on it from day 1, because the irrational hatred for Obama is rampant on the right. The TPP was a long game, but Trump's tariffs are a short-sighted game that won't produce the things he's promising. There's just no way he'll accomplish anything near the scope of the TPP by these tariffs.

    6. Re:Had to be done by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      You just praised Trump, the man who has been frequently non-ironically compared to Adolf Hitler by serious, sober journalists.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re: Had to be done by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why?? The rest of the West has made it quite clear they despise America in general and Trump specifically. Why should we do anything for you ungrateful jerks? You've been very ugly about it, like an ex-wife trashing her former husband. Really hateful and nobody doubts that you were dead serious.

      Make your own deals; stand on your own two feet. Daddy Trump is kicking you out of the basement and into the real world. It's for your own good. Learn to do things on your own.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Had to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      rampant IP theft

      IP theft is only a thing if a nation passes laws saying so.
      If a country doesn't recognize patents and copyright then good for them. Sounds like heaven to me.
      The US off shored most of its manufacturing so of course they need to make IP a thing. I predict a future where the main purpose of the US "defense" force is to enforce more and more draconian IP laws around the world.
      It's only a matter of time until the corporatocracy moves us to never expiring copyright and patents.

    9. Re:Had to be done by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It's so easy to spot paid commenters these days. IP theft claim is exaggerated. Sure thing, Mr. Zhang. Your English sure is good. You went to school in America, didn't you?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    10. Re:Had to be done by cats-paw · · Score: 5, Informative

      Itâ(TM)s the 16th time that the Obama administration has taken complaints about China to the WTO. Of the seven cases that have been decided, the U.S. has won all seven.

      yeah Obama did nothing...
      How this bullshit gets uprated i'll never understand.

      Obama has done NOTHING ? None of you moronic moderators could spend 2 minutes searching to verify that he did NOTHING ?

      https://www.washingtontimes.co...

      And that article came from the Washington Times. Run by a right wing lunatic. Don't believe me check out the headlines at the bottom of the page. So much for fake news.

      The democrats will praise this when they figure out if it really helps or not, since Trump and many of the members of his administration lie often and with impunity.

      Also too, those tariffs the Trumpbots are rallying around are being paid by you, not by China.

      --
      Absolute statements are never true
    11. Re:Had to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Anyone who brings up hitler or nazis to try to win an argument has all ready lost. And is incompetent, at best.

    12. Re:Had to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all of the rest of the western world. We here in Australia have a considerable trade surplus with China. Maybe we should go after the US regarding our trade deficit with them....

    13. Re:Had to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good self knowledge, but Trump EMULATES Hitler a little more each day with his fat faggot ass. He'll hang for sure, but YOU SHOULD ALSO.

      Nazis hang. Killing nazi faggots is a PROUD AMERICAN TRADITION. You picked the wrong side bitches. Pay the piper now, it's Mueller time.

    14. Re:Had to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has been clear for some time that China's trading relationship with the US and the rest of the western world is not a level playing field. Actively hindering US companies from operating in China, currency manipulation, gaming postal treaties and engaging in rampant IP theft is something that has been tolerated for too long.

      So, when the US does it for decades, it is all fine, but when China starts doing those things (not even nearly to the same extent), it suddenly isn't?

    15. Re:Had to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems you replied to the wrong comment...

    16. Re:Had to be done by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Obama did nothing and I doubt Clinton would have either.

      Obama did something. He allowed Americans to go on enjoying cheap products from China rather than forcing them to pay for the made in America prices that no one was very fond of.

    17. Re:Had to be done by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      The TPP was never in place - and Hillary also opposed it. So using it as justification for some weird fantasy you have is, well, a fantasy.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    18. Re:Had to be done by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      For those "journalists", anyone to the right of Bernie Sanders is a Nazi, and even Bernie is suspect sometimes... The Nazis were all about socialized healthcare, Government control of the economy via heavy regulation, and 100% confiscation of personal firearms. What's President Trump's stance on those issues? Where do those "journalists" stand on those issues? I believe the "Nazi accusers" doth protest too much.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    19. Re:Had to be done by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Guess what - if you have a patent in France, I can go to Germany and copy it! Patents - worldwide - are on a country-by-country basis. The issue is that China FORCED you to transfer IP - even the EU took China to the WTO over the practice. China forces companies to share - and grant - IP to Chinese companies, if a foreign company wants to do business in many industries in China. That's against WTO rules.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    20. Re: Had to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, seriously? You really think everyone in the West hates America? I'm Canadian and I can say nobody I know hates America and do enjoy visiting it often. Not sure where you get your information from (InfoWars?) but it's wrong.

    21. Re:Had to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol the chinese rate for the yuan is not pushed up by anything, you're full of shit, the government decides the rate that the yuan will sell for, and yuan is not available outside of china

    22. Re:Had to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Trump's tariffs actually made people buy Made in America products, they might not actually be completely stupid. In practice, the manufacturing base doesn't exist in the US, so we just pay more or buy less of those products instead.

    23. Re:Had to be done by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Stop spreading lies. The nazis had less socialised healthcare than in the monarchy days, the economy regulation was a war thing and their personal firearm laws were far more lenient than most European firearm laws nowadays.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    24. Re:Had to be done by guruevi · · Score: 0

      The WTO is absolutely toothless. So what, they won 7 cases or 70, China hasn't changed their attitude and practices over the last few decades. They thought they had us by the balls with Obama around, "I'll sue you" - fine go ahead, let us build an artificial island in your important shipping lane, "oh okay, we'll retreat our military" from your newfound borders.

      Obama did absolutely nothing, extended a recession and increased taxing and regulation while more and more companies fled to China strengthening both their military and economy. During Obama we were "worried" that China would leverage the debts they purchased, Trump has indicated that the US could simply never pay the debt back and use its military superiority over China to strong-arm them into agreement.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    25. Re: Had to be done by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      It does not matter how many times paperwork was filed.

      What matters is how much in dollar value.

      Niw get off your democratic shithorse and piss off

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    26. Re: Had to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must miss the european shit on america fest here on slashdot on articles like these.

    27. Re:Had to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably don't recognize the logical mistake you made, so I'll point it out and hope you learn from it.

      If Obama "extended a recession", then you are forced to admit that Trump has made the "recession" even worse, and that we are near full societal collapse. Your only other option is to admit that Obama fixed a hugely major broken economy that Trump has inherited, and not managed to fuck up yet, though not for lack of trying.

    28. Re: Had to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's bring your spiel back to the realm of reality.

      America is the ex-wife trying to sue for custody of the kids she beat and molested from the rest of the West. But due to irresponsibility and recklessness, America is about to have to move back into the West's basement after a series of quickly escalating poor decisions.

      You're welcome!

    29. Re: Had to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donald Trump =/= America.
      Strong dislike of Donald Trump =/= dislike of America.

    30. Re:Had to be done by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      Slashdot was pretty united against the TPP too in many of the articles here before Clinton or Trump got involved. It was just a horrible idea all around.

  13. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China the KNOWN currency manipulator who Trump was pretending to play hardball with because they're so dishonest and everyone knows it, THAT China is the one you've suddenly held accountable here? Lol.

    With a 90 day cooling off period and no teeth? FUCKING LIE MORE OBVIOUSLY I LOVE YOUR SHIT. Say anything! It's not YOU getting laid off right? Anything goes from "They don't use Gallium in processors" Bill here.

    NOBEL! NOBEL! Lol?

  14. We got talks by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    they got us to back down on tariffs. OTOH Trump probably couldn't have done those tariffs anyway. Not without wrecking the economy.

    Meanwhile the outsourcing continues, with GM moving 14,000 jobs to Mexico (and rather cleverly blaming it on declining demand for cars vs SUVs while ignoring the new SUV & Truck factories in Mexico).

    Nothing change. Everything continues apace. Well, except we borrowed another $1 trillion as a giveaway to Trump's wealthy friends in the top 1%.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:We got talks by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Informative

      they got us to back down on tariffs.

      Nope. The 10% in place stays in place. China agreed (finally) to talk about IP theft, trade balance, and drug controls. And for that they get a 90 day stay against an INCREASE from 10% to 25%.

      OTOH Trump probably couldn't have done those tariffs anyway. Not without wrecking the economy.

      No sign that the tariffs in place since September have done much to the economy or country, so what makes you think you'd have bigger impacts from the additional tariffs on $200 billion in trade? We're talking about tariffs going from $20 billion to $50 billion.

      Meanwhile the outsourcing continues, with GM moving 14,000 jobs to Mexico (and rather cleverly blaming it on declining demand for cars vs SUVs while ignoring the new SUV & Truck factories in Mexico).

      Yep! And thanks to the President, when GM does move those jobs, they have to pay at least $16/hour for the labor in Mexico, meaning there is a LOT less incentive to move the jobs in the first place - and it will rapidly build up the Mexican economy too.

      Nothing change. Everything continues apace. Well, except we borrowed another $1 trillion as a giveaway to Trump's wealthy friends in the top 1%.

      Yeah, he's got another $9 trillion to go before he equals his predecessor, who also gave away 17% of the economy to his friends in Big Pharma and Big Healthcare...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:We got talks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they got us to back down on tariffs.

      Nope. The 10% in place stays in place. China agreed (finally) to talk about IP theft, trade balance, and drug controls. And for that they get a 90 day stay against an INCREASE from 10% to 25%.

      No You were going to automatically increase them to 25%
      You backed down and kept them at 10%
      Because you know 25% is just not workable for America. It was always a bluff and China knows it. Well, everyone but you does.

      They have been talking about those things for literally years before Trump.

  15. Revisionist history taught by illiterate retards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In all the "new workers" looking for jobs in America's heartland as a result of this, Trump "creates jobs" by DESTROYING THEIR OLD ONE. Nobel! Nobel!

  16. Re: Why would China agree to anything in good fait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone will take them seriously because they are the big dog on the block.

    Same reason people take them seriously even after a few decades of rampant IP theft. Because they have weight to throw around, and throw it around they do.

  17. He didn't "do" anything yet you lying cunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should be strangled for lying in defense of a nazi traitor. That should be the new standard, because America apparently needs brand new standards to measure treasonous lying faggots these days.

    #ROPE SALES UP THOUGH!

  18. IP theft doesn't matter to me by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it's not a job creator. It's just money in the hands of whoever owns the patents.

    All he did was get them to agree to talk. That's not much of an outcome. Also, there's no way in hell Trump could throw an across the board 25% tariff on Chinese goods on the books. We rely on cheap Chinese goods to make up for declining and/or stagnant wages. His base, and indeed the entire country, would notice that big time. It would torpedo his next election.

    This whole thing is political theater. Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. Meanwhile more manufacturing jobs keep getting outsourced.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:IP theft doesn't matter to me by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All he did was get them to agree to talk.

      Not true. China agreed to immediately start buying more American goods, especially farm products. Higher soybean prices in America, and cheaper tofu in China. Win-win.

    2. Re:IP theft doesn't matter to me by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      China has made that proposal back in June. And if the US insists raising the tariffs after 90 days, you can be sure this agreement is over and China will stop buying US farm products.

    3. Re:IP theft doesn't matter to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the Chinese are already moving back to buying more farm products, especially pork products, right now before the tariffs are removed - or before there was any negotiation.

      See, there's a major pork shortage in China because of an unknown size, be apparently massive outbreak of swine flu that is killing much of their production. In other words, the Chinese people want pork, and can't get it without going to the US.

      So the US wins this round - not because of Trump, but because of disease. Expect an agreement that sounds good in a few months. Then, in three or four years when their domestic market has recovered, expect the Chinese to piss all over it, like they have every previous trade agreement.

    4. Re:IP theft doesn't matter to me by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      I was watching interviews with farmers who were impacted by the tariffs. It was like :
      "We planted Soy this year... no one bought it and the silos can't take it... so we dumped it in a yard next to the silos and got paid"
      "Next year, we'll flood the corn or grain market because the tariffs are killing demand for soy today and we'd rather plant stuff with demand"
      "Trump has been giving us money so we don't have to worry about losing the farm"
      "We'll suffer like this today so that our kids will have it better tomorrow"

      All that seems to have happened is that China agreed to wait to come to an agreement. They of course agreed to import stuff they planned to import anyway but can negotiate price on now because it's sitting and collecting dust. Maybe they'll pay full price, but it's supply and demand and China has managed to meet most of the demand by buying from Brazil for example. So, while the US has a tremendous supply, the Chinese aren't desperate, so the buyer will set the price.

      As for stagnant wages. I don't understand. I've had increasing wages consistently for the past 25 years. I make five-six times as much now as I did in 1999. My wife makes at least double.

      Ohhhh... you mean for the minimum wage bracket. As in the people working for employers who do things like take a $9 an hour minimum wage and offer $9.15 to buy employee loyalty because he's saying "Look how much I appreciate you... I would never pay you minimum wage!" or the other poor bastards working for minimum wage which is an employer's means of saying "You have so little value to me, I would pay you less if the government would let me.".

      Are you under the impression that the president of the United States has any connection to what it means to worry about the price of milk or a toothbrush? I was homeless when I was in my early 20s, living in a car that was so filthy I should have died from sepsis or similar. And I have no idea what the price of eggs, milk or a toothbrush is. I consider it hardship when I have less than $10,000 a month to waste on shit I don't need. And no I never bother with savings because the money basically just keeps coming in bigger and bigger amounts as I get older. And now I'm in a place where I can climb ladders and there's room for me to double, triple or quadruple my income again in the next 10-20 years while getting board seats.

      No... middle and upper class (not income... class... there's a real difference. Middle income is a fancy term politicians made up to make poor people feel like they're actually middle class) won't even notice the slightest bit if they have to pay $1.25 for a toothbrush instead of $1.00 because they probably paid that anyway.

      Also make no mistake that China can easily drop prices as well. If China wants to win this one, they can make things even cheaper. Look at the prices they're paying for the sames things in China. Surf the shopping sites using Google Translate. The prices are considerably less. If you look closely, you'll find that most of the price you're paying for pretty much everything is shipping... which they wouldn't pay tax on anyway. So... why not just charge a little less for the toothbrush and a little more for the shipping? In fact, instead of charging $1 for the toothbrush and $0 for shipping. Why not charge $0.05 for the toothbrush and $1.00 for the shipping. This would actually hurt Americans as it would drive the prices up and pay almost nothing in taxes.

      Also, the dollar is REALLY REALLY REALLY strong right now. I've recommended to customers in 3 countries now to place all USD purchases on hold until it becomes predictable. There's too much risk negotiating purchases in dollars right now. If American companies want that business (total of about $3.1 billion), they'll have to commit and negotiate in EUR because anything purchased in dollars is simply too volatile right now. I know that at least a few of those customers have taken my advise. None of they really need those purchases, at least n

    5. Re:IP theft doesn't matter to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps a mere conspiracy theory, but it wouldn't surprise me if the American government (cough CIA) basically conducted biological warfare by infecting China's pork stock with African swine flu. They say that it may have spread with wild hogs through central Asia, but I'm not sure how much stock to put in that story.

      That said actually China still has a lot of pork, but there's a huge disparity in prices depending on where you are, because you can't transport pork products for fear of infecting other provinces. So e.g. in the NE pork prices are pretty cheap.

      Anyways the US consumer and pretty much anyone who isn't the 1% is pretty much losing with tariffs, so I'm not so sure how much a win it is for the American populace. But perhaps China's consumers in some small way are winning with cheaper products.

    6. Re:IP theft doesn't matter to me by fubarrr · · Score: 1

      Hi Bill,

      Nice to see you alive and kicking.

      I can't say that this was a Win-Win in a political dimension. While it was in-fact more of a "blinking contest," there is more underlying dynamics to it.

      See, Trump is seen as a man to took on to initiate aggression, he took some flak back, but in the end he will be seen as somebody who taught China a lesson, even if he didn't, but Xi will be seen a man who made a big commitment to teach America a lesson, spectacularly failing at that, and at huge price to Chinese industry, in overall a loser.

      China lost international standing, and US gained. Everybody will now feel that US can force its agenda in economic disputes even against China. Some other countries will also think that China is an easy target now.

      De-facto, Trump framed the conflict so that Xi will be seen as a loser both ways: if he blinks first, he takes hit to his image, if he didn't blink, he will be seen as a man who failed Chinese industry/middle class.

      The only thing which would've worked for Xi would be to respond to offence tenfold, and China definitely has capability for that. For example, China has all things needed to not only hurt American rust belt and agricultural economy, but to totally ravage it. China has also everything needed to make "High-End" industry in US squeal too: Intel, Qualcomm, Apple, Microsoft have so much stake in China, that they will do everything to retain access to China. China can make them both pay dearly, and turn them into compliant pawns.

      Xi should fire that Wang Yi guy, and give me his job. Were it me there, I could've delivered China one more decade of prosperity and growth at cost of nuking its relationship with US (which are unrecoverable anyways.)

      My main point in all of that: American needs China's cheap exports and access to its economy more than China needs its exports to America, and access to US economy. And there are way way more avenues for growth for China if it was to take initiative in building its own trade block, discrediting WTO, and writing its own rules of the game.

    7. Re:IP theft doesn't matter to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They say that it may have spread with wild hogs through central Asia, but I'm not sure how much stock to put in that story." -and i'm not sure how much a fucking Q-anon faggot lying on the internet matters either way.

      Of course it started there, MANY VARIETIES DID, you've never been to China go fuck yourself with your bullshit CIA conspiracy. Fuck you. You are the problem with Trump land.

      Fucking moron. Go invent a cock and suck it in a Havana airport you fucking goosh.

    8. Re:IP theft doesn't matter to me by gtall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China's been willing to talk all along. The Trump Administration couldn't find anything like a coherent policy position from themselves. And anything they have floated amounted to telling China to stop advancing to a super-power, which went over very well with the Chinese, as you can expect.

    9. Re:IP theft doesn't matter to me by gtall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just remember Trump destroys everything he touches. And the U.S. is has gained nothing except the animosity of its allies and the contempt of its enemies. Most countries know what Trump is. Any "nice" things they come out with are mere to pump his ego, they will agree to nothing substantially good for the U.S.

    10. Re:IP theft doesn't matter to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All he did was get them to agree to talk.

      China agreed to immediately start buying more American goods

      [ Citation needed ]

    11. Re:IP theft doesn't matter to me by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      These "allies" already held us in contempt. We provide their defense for free and they criticize the manner in which we provide it. And who can forget Obama's awful apology tour where he humiliated himself and our nation in front of the world. On purpose. Including bowing to royalty, something Americans don't do. He didn't even regard China as an enemy, what an idiot. Would we even be here without Trump's tough line?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    12. Re: IP theft doesn't matter to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You so angry.

    13. Re: IP theft doesn't matter to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this 'here' that you *think* is better than where we were before the current administration? The majority of the US AND the world isn't seeing what you're seeing.

    14. Re:IP theft doesn't matter to me by geek · · Score: 1

      Oh please do fuck right off with your doom and gloom bullshit

    15. Re:IP theft doesn't matter to me by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work that way. Modern factory farms will have huge die-offs if not well-managed, and well managed livestock won't spread disease at the rate that causes a big problem.

      If they are susceptible to biological warfare targeting livestock, they're already experiencing disease epidemics naturally. If they can prevent natural epidemics that are expected when you have that many animals in a small area, they're already preventing the sort of small-scale biological warfare that you envision.

      It isn't enough to feed the animals a bunch of medicine, you have to actively identify, segregate, and destroy affected animals. If you don't have the sort of regulatory environment to enforce that, you will have epidemics that periodically destroy the local industry.

    16. Re:IP theft doesn't matter to me by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      They're willing to talk, but the trade dispute is about trade, not about willingness to talk. :)

      And Trump doesn't really need a coherent position, since the Chinese haven't been willing to "negotiate," only to "talk."

      His lack of coherency is what is slowing him down, thankfully, since most of his opponents are just as incoherent.

  19. And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    since we let them buy up our hog farms. That was just nuts, BTW. Who the hell lets a hostile foreign power buy it's food supply? Seriously, who does that?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Halliburton traded with Iran during all those wars and hawky-talks, aw shucks. Vice President, that's like VP of arms sales now. Saudi Arabia : "Koshoggi tripped, swear to god."

      Trump : "Well, they swear to God, what can you do? I hear China is even going to present me with a huge rolling wooden horse as some kind tribute, so smart. They know I'm so smart."

    2. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What does is matter who owns them? If we ever went to war or something like that, it's pretty easy to seize those assets, since they're in the U.S. and so are the people who actually work on them. If Chinese investors do a better job running those farms, are Americans any worse off because they are more productive? If Chinese investors do a worse job, won't they just lose out to better run businesses?

    3. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      since we let them buy up our hog farms. That was just nuts, BTW. Who the hell lets a hostile foreign power buy it's food supply? Seriously, who does that?

      Do you think they packed up the hog farms and moved them to China?

      China does not control our food supply. We control THEIR food supply. Or at least their pork supply.

      Prior to buying the hog farms they were buying up American corn and soybeans, shipping them to China, and using them to raise hogs. Then they bought the hog farms so they could raise the hogs in America, and ship one jin of pork instead of 10 jin of pig food. It is just basic economic efficiency, and benefits both countries.

      Smithfield Foods bought by Shuanghui Group

      1 jin = 500g

    4. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he's wrong because ? Globalism is bad? What exactly is dumb in your opinion if only an opinion.

    5. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, the Chinese have been buying up a shit-ton of land and property, and refuse to rent unless the price is inflated. No other civilized country allows non-citizens to own real estate... except for the US, and it is causing rents to spiral out of control.

    6. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious or trolling? Jesus. It'd be a waste of time to try to explain to someone who knows so little about this that they don't see how China owning major swatches of important US industries and markets, especially with the major AND INCREASING trade imbalance under Trump, while continuing to manipulate their currency, steal IP, counterfeit, hack US domestic economic consumer groups and allow that by state-sponsored criminal/pirate groups, push militarism and expansionism in the South China sea which is NOT owned by them unless you ask them, and are currently making major inroads in struggling 3rd world countries to buy up all THEIR major strategic and export resources as well at the same time... I mean you don't see any of this, so why would I waste time explaining it to you?

      Yeah, so you can go dance in the rain with Trump for 90 days. *Confetti* (Mission Accomplished banner unfurls...)

      "The Art of the Deal" books shot out of a t-shirt cannon into the crowd, injuring dozens. Fuck em. Casualties of incompetent Empire, ain't it all glorious?

      Paint the oceans gold.

    7. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think Trump's going to be in a BETTER or WORSE bargaining advantage in 90 days, and why, Bill? Let's assess your bullshit math at length?

      How many jobs would you estimate have been lost already, let's start there.

      We can leave the Mueller card until the end.

    8. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow in all that text you failed to say anything about why anything he said was wrong.

      Do you have a counterargument?

    9. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably better. If Xi doesn't move, then it's 100% proof-positive China has no desire to commit to fair trade, and on comes the tariffs. If Xi does move, then Trump can keep pressing with additional 90 day "stays" still there, until he gets what he wants. And since treaties are the domain of the Senate (which is in stronger GOP hands), Trump will have more support in the chamber of Congress that matters.

    10. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how many people lose their job and get bailed with taxpayer money (already in the Billions) and you still call it a huge win, you lying cunts? Move those goalposts right up your golden ass.

      https://www.agriculture.com/news/business/trump-to-cut-soybean-farmers-a-check-for-165-per-bushel

    11. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did call it, you're beyond understanding why important things that matter are important and are blinded by Trump's shiny taxpayer-funded anus. Good luck in life. He'll probably hang, enjoy your soybeans!

      https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/trump-soybean-prices-near-decade-lows-2018-9-1027572176

      "Trump said soybean prices have gone up. They're near decade-lows." - Leadership, lol.

    12. Re: And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody seemed to care thaf hundreds of thousands of jobs and futures were offshored under previous presidential administrations. People forget that. They forget the beginnings of the American Rust Belt.

      Whatever Trump does now, he does in the devestating aftermath of THAT. So save your ridiculous anti-Trump arguments. He hasn't let people down anywhere near what those who came before him did. He just did it to those who could, up until now, afford to ignore it.....sucks to be them, but the rest of us will get over it. They did nothing when it wasn't them, no one will lose no sleep for them now.

    13. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      No other civilized country allows non-citizens to own real estate... except for the US

      Most countries allow foreign ownership of land.

      China does not, but China doesn't allow its own citizens to own land either. All land title is held by the state.

      and it is causing rents to spiral out of control.

      1. Property values are going up because of an imbalance of supply and demand. Remove restrictions on new construction and the problem is solved.

      2. Foreigners buying real estate in America is a GOOD THING. It is wealth coming into America and being invested here. It requires some real mental gymnastics to believe foreign investment is bad for America.

    14. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Confetti* (Mission Accomplished banner unfurls...)

      I think you mean "Covfefe"

    15. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None, so far. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Do you have anything saying how many lost jobs? And you act like subsidies to farmers are novel... Here's a hint - they've been done for decades, and were intensified after FDR and his crooked Supreme Court decided that you growing your own food could be regulated because of the Interstate Commerce clause...

    16. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since we let them buy up our hog farms. That was just nuts, BTW. Who the hell lets a hostile foreign power buy it's food supply? Seriously, who does that?

      If you look very carefully the wholesale food industry in both Canada and the US is very quickly being bought up by Russian mafia and the Chinese. What is even even more disturbing is the rate at which private care facilities and prime retirement real estate is being bought up by both Chinese and Russian so called businessmen. In Canada they purchase all sorts of properties all the while pumping drugs into the street and laundering money in the casinos. We are on the road to selling out completely to what is essentially international organized crime, Donald Trump is just the mouth piece and another insider asshole of the Putin group of companies. The real war will take place when the Russian and Chinese gangs start to feud again over the spoils.

    17. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by jpaine619 · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is with you lefties? Are you even capable of telling the truth?

      Is Mexico uncivilized? You know you can buy land in Mexico right? The only prohibition they have, that I am aware of, is on coastal (20km) properties.

      The UK permits foreign ownership of land.

      There's two examples..

      So, either you are an idiot who can't do a google search or... YOU ARE A FUCKING LIAR. I think the latter is more likely

    18. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6 Billion plus in taxpayer money thrown into a pit and the Republicans keep apologizing for it like it's normal? Get a life dishonest faggots. You will pay in the end.

    19. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who buys another country's food? One who rather have stuff than children, that's who.

    20. Re: And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "restricted zone" is 50 miles from borders or coasts but otherwise anyone can buy property in Mexico. Baja California, where fake news claims the migrants are running for their lives, is a particularly lovely and safe part of the country.

    21. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is unlikely. Republicans and Democrats will probably agree not to toss taxpayer money into the chinese pit for no reason. Sure, the chinese exporters have costs and payment for goods pays those costs and tax subsidies to US firms pay for goods. Pointing to a chinese national paying some tariff or calculating what percentage of some kids toy's final price goes to farm subsidies and saying oh, we are subsidizing this that or the other thing is completely the wrong way to look at it. Do you put gas in your car and think, oh I am subsidizing the auto body shop that worked on it last? Of course you don't. As they say in the midwest, it will all come out in the wash, which for you libtards means that the numbers will end up being equal or correct at the end.

    22. Re: And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Six billion is about 14 hours of average government spending. Wake me up when that matters.

    23. Re: And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "it will all come out in the wash" doesn't mean anything will end fairly. "fairness" is a human construct, the universe neither knows nor cares about it.

    24. Re: And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an English word for Jin: Catty

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catty

    25. Re: And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People forget that Mitch McConnell filibustered Democrat (see what I did there?) bills to (economically) punish companies that shipped "rustbelt" jobs overseas.

    26. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      No other civilized country allows non-citizens to own real estate... except for the US

      Most countries allow foreign ownership of land.

      That's insanely derpy. Just go and do a web search on what countries a foreigner can buy land in. I know you're allergic to looking up your claims to check, but just try it. It will be funny.

    27. Re: And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      If Chinese investors do a better job running those farms, are Americans any worse off because they are more productive?

      Your definition of "better job" is no doubt the Chinese would use.

      However, I'm sure our definition would be rather different.

    28. Re: And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Where is the lovely part of Baja that is over 50 miles from a coast?

    29. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by McFortner · · Score: 1

      What does is matter who owns them? If we ever went to war or something like that, it's pretty easy to seize those assets, since they're in the U.S. and so are the people who actually work on them.

      Right up until somebody sues and a court puts an injunction on it. And that will happen faster than you can say "BBQ pork, please".

      --
      Beware of Sales Reps bearing gifts.
    30. Re: And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh god... three levels in and absolutely NOTHING was added to the argument nor to the counter. Other than "you are all too dumb to understand". The original counter about ownership and sovereignty still stands.

      Please just stop posting on this thread. We are all now dumber from the crap already here.

    31. Re: And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's businesses in YOUR country, YOUR land... why would the Chinese be run under different rules than the locals? "Better" would still be in an Apples to Apples market.

      Are we all really having this STUPID of a discussion? US companies own operations all over the world. It's been a globally linked business world since before the Great Depression (1930s).

    32. Re: And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      We're both wrong. It's 50 km/30 miles from the ocean (you said 50 miles, I said 20 km) and 100 km/60 miles from an international border. But there are legal ways around the restrictions (with the blessing of the Mexican government). You can set up a living trust in Mexico and then purchase the property through that.

    33. Re:And a big chunk of that goes to the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the problem is that the profits are then going back to China, instead of staying in the US. We're paying rent on our own land.

  20. Fucking idiot by WindBourne · · Score: 1, Insightful

    He was doing good with tariff increase on china, and should have brought it up to same level as china 's highest tariff on western goods. At least, should have limited to 45 or 60 days, not end of march.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Fucking idiot by alvinrod · · Score: 0, Troll

      Tariffs are idiotic and Trump is stupid for using them at all. If the Chinese want to make their own citizens pay more for goods when they could buy cheaper American ones, that's their loss. Worse yet, they only encourage their own industry to remain less efficient and allow it to remain inefficient.

      Similarly if they want to subsidize their industries, we should import as many of those goods as possible, since it's the Chinese taxpayer who is ultimately paying for Americans to have cheaper prices.

    2. Re:Fucking idiot by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Tariffs are idiotic and Trump is stupid for using them at all.

      Permanent tariffs are idiotic. But temporary tariffs to force a trading partner to the bargaining table can sometimes be a smart move.

      If the Chinese want to make their own citizens pay more for goods when they could buy cheaper American ones, that's their loss.

      It is also America's loss. Trade is win-win. Restraints on trade are lose-lose.

    3. Re:Fucking idiot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      A lot of US companies were being threatened by those tariffs. 25% on the components they need to do manufacturing in the US. 25% on goods they get OEM'd from China.

      Sure Apple could withstand it, but plenty of companies operate on smaller margins than that.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not really. Plenty of alternatives sources esp in parts.

    5. Re:Fucking idiot by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Tariffs are idiotic and Trump is stupid for using them at all.

      War is stupid, too, but it is much better than the alternative....being conquered.

      Similarly if they want to subsidize their industries, we should import as many of those goods as possible, since it's the Chinese taxpayer who is ultimately paying for Americans to have cheaper prices.

      Meanwhile, America loses all manufacturing capacity. Thank you for that.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  21. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hillary will be running the prison Trump gets buried under. (Not really, we have professional wardens and she's out of office - though she still rents the brains of retards like you for free apparently)

  22. So,he failed... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 0, Troll

    So,Trump failed. When it was obvious China was going to call his ultimatum bluff, he extended the deadline 30 days. Cause otherwise it would be obvious he failed. But China understands face-saving non-things. So they agreed to stop boycotting our agricultural products... which only existed because of Trump's policies. So, we've gained nothing.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  23. At least, trump needs to rework corp taxes by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    Seriously, time for him to rig taxes like other nations. Cut the corp tax, for in-nation items. If done outside, or selling imported goods, then tax at 25%.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:At least, trump needs to rework corp taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not an economist. Sorry!

    2. Re:At least, trump needs to rework corp taxes by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I would love to see the following:

      A 0% corporate income tax on any company domiciled in the US.To be domiciled in the US, you must meet the following criteria:

      1. Your headquarters must be located within the 50 States

      2. Your primary financial institutions and auditors must be domiciled within the 50 States

      3. At least 60% of your VP-or-higher executives must live at least 200 days a year within the 50 States

      4. At least 67% of your board of directors must live at least 200 days a year within the 50 States

      You meet all those - and you're a US domiciled corporation, and subject to 0% corporate income tax. I suspect the increase in personal income taxes and employment - without a single change to taxation rates - would more than offset the "loss" of corporate income tax revenues the Federal government receives. Pretty much all major players worldwide would want to relocate to the US. Yes, it's an inconvenience for the executive leadership, but for the vast majority of workers and shareholders it would be a significant benefit.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    3. Re: At least, trump needs to rework corp taxes by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      We need to bring back the work as well. That is why I suggested 40% of manufacturing, or sold product, be American. Than raise it yearly until hitting 80%. But I agree with rest of yours.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:At least, trump needs to rework corp taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess, you complain about China favoring it's own companies too right?
      Don't answer it's rhetorical.

    5. Re:At least, trump needs to rework corp taxes by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Go to China and try to start a telecom or financial business. Go to China and try to start an automotive, steel, or airplane company. Good luck. Closed market. Much of the bigger, more important industries are either 100% owned by the Chinese Government, or legally are required to be owned by at least 51% Chinese Government agencies. Not so in the US or the EU.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re: At least, trump needs to rework corp taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you hate poor people so much?
      Is it because they remind you of Chinese people?

    7. Re:At least, trump needs to rework corp taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because America doesn't regulate the hell out of all those industries. LOL
      Plus you are factually wrong. No point arguing with clueless people.

    8. Re:At least, trump needs to rework corp taxes by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Regulate - yes. Ban ownership of? No. China bans ownership. World of difference. Heavy regulation is socialist; outright State ownership is communist.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  24. Life in Prison Mr. President? Enjoy, earned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Nazi pretends to speak for 'liberals' with incoherent arguments mirroring Fox News' retarded defenses of a traitor about to die in Federal Prison with his bitch beta sons, news at 11."

    You don't really expect him to still be in office in 90 days do you retard lol? Ahaha. More like 9 at this rate.

    I don't think they like pedos in prison either. Trump's going to have problems lusting after his daughter in public as he's wont to do.

    Oh well, that's his problem now.

  25. Re: This is very good. Double down Mr President... by WindBourne · · Score: 0

    Ok. How many jobs did this cost?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  26. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did too.

  27. what does this mean? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Does that mean I can continue to get cheap shit from Banggood?

  28. Re: Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, we totally should have just sent ten times that amount to Iran. At night. In an unmarked cargo plane. That's what real presidents do.

  29. WindBourne: Fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Such a short timeframe would be useless. Not enough time to negotiate anything . Way too disruptive to businesses. Why do you hate business so much?
    As an aside, why does America have such high taxes on light trucks and pickups? Should the rest of the world raise their tariffs to match US's high tariffs?
    Why has your stock market not increased in 2018? Wasn't Trump pro business, tax cuts etc etc? Oh yea, shot yourselves in the foot with tariffs...

    1. Re:WindBourne: Fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo on all counts, mod up. Tarriffs always were a double edged sword, everyone knew that but Trump, now he's caving and catching his bitch breath (for 90 days) and we're supposed to CLAP? Give me a break.

  30. Re:Revisionist history taught by illiterate retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you on about? The previous president was telling Americans about "new normals" with a shrinking economy and jobs that would never come back.

    Now, jobs are coming back, employment rates are at record levels - and you find room to complain now?

  31. Re:Why would China agree to anything in good faith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Chinese blinked. Trump got exactly what he wanted out of the tariff war. Trumps bellicose statements forced both Canada and Mexico to update the NAFTA trade pact. He didn't get everything he wanted but the US did get a better deal. One of the least talked about pieces of the agreement was requiring any Mexican worker involved in the manufacture automotive related products exported to the US have to earn a minimum of $15 per hour. The is not only good for the Mexican workers but it also removes the number one reason US manufacturers move operations to Mexico which is labor costs.

  32. Re: Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually you sound like youâ(TM)re whining

  33. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Peanuts are still better than bugger all. Trump fights the world when he goes against globalism, any tiny step he makes in the process compares favourably against the steps of every administration before him for the last 5 odd decades.

    He killed the TPP, he's in the process of massively increasing the requirements for H-1B's, he's trying to renegotiate NAFTA with ISDS removed for most industries.

    Do you think any other presidential candidate would have done or will do anything close to that? He's not very competent, but if you actually want to see pro-labour policies in the US you can only vote for a 2nd term of Trump. Any other vote is a vote for a globalist race to the bottom.

  34. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When was the last time they manipulated the currency? Short sellers of "euro" yuans have been causing a steep drop in currency, while China generally has been trying to prop it up, otherwise it would have easily dropped below 7 to 1. If you mean propping it up is currency manipulation then you're an idiot. Moreover, the US currency manipulates as well when it prints out trillions of new dollars and issues trillions of dollars worth of bonds.

  35. Wouldn't call this an outcome by Pollux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So far, it's just discussion.

    The common theme of President Trump throughout his presidency is this: he's a chaotic leader. You cannot question that he is an effective leader -- just look at the success he has at his rallies. I'm not saying you have to like the guy or his methods, but you have to at least acknowledge that he is successful at inspiring people to follow him. And he does it by being chaotic.

    And his approach to China is no different. Just as he tells reporters about meeting Russia at the G20 summit ("Maybe I will, maybe I won't."), or about Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's involvement in Khashoggi's death ("Maybe he knew, maybe he didn't."), Trump is consistently ambiguous and aloof regarding his position with practically anything. What he says to China today can still change tomorrow. There are no guarantees, only promises. And China is as good at keeping their promises as Trump is.

    So, while that chaos does give us leverage against China (what little we have), I predict it's still going to get us nowhere in the end. While Trump may momentarily have the upper hand, he has a grievous fault that will work against it: he's narcissistic. It's impossible for him to negotiate for what's good for the United States. He negotiates for himself, aiming for outcomes that give him clout (i.e. USMCA, but don't you dare call it "New NAFTA") and economic gain (i.e. tax cuts). He doesn't give a damn about the soybean farmers and every other working class American suffering while this deal is getting negotiated and worked out. Nor will he care about who benefits or doesn't in the end, so long as he gets his.

    1. Re:Wouldn't call this an outcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's being a troll, not chaotic.

      Words matter.

    2. Re:Wouldn't call this an outcome by larryjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You cannot question that he is an effective leader -- just look at the success he has at his rallies. I'm not saying you have to like the guy or his methods, but you have to at least acknowledge that he is successful at inspiring people to follow him. And he does it by being chaotic.

      I do question many aspects of his effectiveness as a leader. There are some things and policies that I think he's doing right and others that I think are wrong. His rallies only show that the Republican base enthusiastically supports him. However, that base represents less than a majority of Americans. Trump has energized Democrats in a way that not even Obama could do. Trump has failed miserably in getting citizens and political leaders outside of his base (i.e., the majority) to follow him. This is the true measure of leadership, and in this regard, he has failed miserably.

    3. Re:Wouldn't call this an outcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to give a set of excuses as to why American society will refuse to follow Trump

      * a significant portion of the population are not smart enough to account for a long term strategy for the whole of American society i.e. people are dumb and selfish
      * a significant portion of the population do not care to examine the issues fairly with proper context and with reasonable evidence i.e. I know what I know and I cannot be wrong

      This is the way of normal people. Society in general don't have the time and temperament to examine their knowledge and society in a critical but fair manner. What they do is rely on the knowledge of the neighbors and friends whom they trust. If these trusted friends are like everyone else, they will keep ideas taught to them by their teachers in academia, teachers who have really shitty ideas.

      PS. I know I am a normal person who has flaws in my knowledge, evidence and logic.

    4. Re:Wouldn't call this an outcome by Can'tNot · · Score: 1

      he is successful at inspiring people to follow him. And he does it by being chaotic.

      You're using that word in a funny way. "Inspire." I'm not sure that "chaotic" is really accurate either, his messages have really been quite consistent: "Blame everything bad on foreigners*, Muslims, and Democrats, in that order. The media is out to get me, and anything negative they say about me is fake. I am the biggest, best, and smartest person ever."

      This trade war was just an extension of his practice of blaming things on foreigners - in this case, blaming China for perceived economic woes. This way he could present himself as the peoples' champion, fighting against China for our benefit. It's "inspirational" only to those people who are able to ignore the fact that he created the problem which he has now sort of resolved.

      * "Except the ones I like, who are predominantly dictators."

    5. Re:Wouldn't call this an outcome by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You cannot question that he is an effective leader -- just look at the success he has at his rallies. I'm not saying you have to like the guy or his methods, but you have to at least acknowledge that he is successful at inspiring people to follow him.

      That doesn't make him an effective leader, just popular with a certain segment. For example he has failed to reform healthcare, failed to build the wall or make Mexico pay for it, failed to get the Muslim travel ban in place, failed to fight for LGBT rights as he promised to... Not to mention how many staff members he has been through in just a couple of years.

      Trump isn't some genius leader or businessman, he's a failure. His life is littered with failures, from Trump Airlines to Trump Steaks to Trump University to casinos... Why would his presidency be any different?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  36. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well he caved in the sense that he stated that winning the trade war was easy. Moreover, China is probably going to just delay until 2020.

  37. How many jobs did it save? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot more were lost than it saved. World growth was slowed, and the US markets lost all it's gains for a year.
    Oh and your trade deficit got worse, along with your budget. Brilliant job Mr President.

    1. Re:How many jobs did it save? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

      NASDAQ and DJIA were up for the year, from Jan 21 to Nov 30.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:How many jobs did it save? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not pick and choose what statistics you believe in....

      Oh wait you're the Lynnwood Denier, carry on.

    3. Re:How many jobs did it save? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

      Check Jan 2 to Nov 30th (the last trade day at this point) - both up! Sucks to be wrong, doesn't AC?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  38. Re:Revisionist history taught by illiterate retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    COAL JOBS are coming back? Nope. GM just shed a ton! Manufacturing IS NOT coming back, despite Trump's bullshit (debunked) promises of steel plants. HE LIED ABOUT BMW AND MEXICO AND ALL OF IT.

    His ridiculous internal-politik pissing match with China that he just threw the towel in on? The bailouts for farmers he affected with that? WHERE DID THAT MONEY COME FROM? SOCIALISM? FUCK YOU.

    The ONLY thing he did successfully of ANY sort was the recent redraw of NAFTA, which was stalled way too long as a result OF REPUBLICAN OBSTRUCTION, not like Obama didn't address it.

    You pathetic craven faggots don't even live here why do you pretend to half-remember the last 8 years, and why would anyone trust you to be a source for retelling them?

    You're FAGGOT LYING TRAITORS backing a FRAUD. Mueller will see you now.

  39. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    paywalled?

    By us or Mexico?

  40. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    90 days of nothing IS BUGGER ALL you pedo moron! A promise from Xi is even LESS enforceable than a promise from Trump himself, and we all know how WORTHLESS those are. Those of us who can read anyhow.

  41. Obfuscationalist Bill again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Do you think they packed up the hog farms and moved them to China?" - Bill tries rhetoric in defense of a clueless lying traitor, again. Maybe it'll work? Maybe China will just give in at 90 days. Pray with us, Bill.

    Pray to your God Money and sacrifice the truth for Trump's pleasure. What are a few hundred thousand American jobs if you can just bail them out with taxpayer money, no problemo right?

    For a Republican liar and a Republican Congress, maybe.

    1. Re:Obfuscationalist Bill again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You sure convinced me with those hot opinions.

    2. Re: Obfuscationalist Bill again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At under 10% unemployment, I am sure they can easily find other jobs. Most of the other countries around the world are able to cope with it just fine.

  42. Re:And we all know what a Chinese promise is worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    You're thinking about "Obama".

  43. Re:Revisionist history taught by illiterate retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL You mean gig jobs? You mean service jobs cleaning bed pans? Those are the sectors where there has been job growth. Pretty much every other sector has experienced no growth or has been shedding jobs. BTW. unemployment numbers were roughly the same under Obama in 2016 and now.

  44. Re:And we all know what a Chinese promise is worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are born liars.

    I know you are, but what am I?

    I'd give you a hug, but you probably have the clap.

  45. Re: Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thatâ(TM)s not how that works at all.

  46. What currency manipulation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You swallowed that whole didn't you?
    It's about time the US started to pay up. You print so much money and then buy as much as you can from other countries. If you could get your consumption under control, maybe if you had to use worked for money instead of being the reserve currency, you would cut back a little.
    China isn't forcing you to buy all that cheap junk, you are demanding it and they are supplying it. It's 2 sides of the same coin. Live within your means and watch as the idle factories lay off Chinese workers.

    1. Re:What currency manipulation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awww, someone has their panties in a wad. LLASI. No one is forcing you to buy our currency. And please create your own IP.

  47. Re:Life in Prison Mr. President? Enjoy, earned. by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 1

    you are more likely to win the publishers clearing house giveaway which has nearly a 1 in 1.7 billion odds then Trumper ever seeing 1 day in jail. So for gods sake give up your sanctimonious slashdot crusade which only makes you look dumber than our POTUS and that my friend is a pretty high bar to beat.

  48. They didn't get anything by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Informative

    they got us to back down on tariffs.M

    You really don't understand what is going on, do you?

    There were never going to be tariffs that high. Trump laid them out as a gamut knowing China had a weaker position then the U,S. if those tariffs were actually implemented. So just as Trump knew would happen, China backed down and is now roughly doing what we want.

    This the part of the world Trump knows cold, he knows how to work positive and negative sides of a deal to make the other party do what he wants. That has been clear long before he was president, if anyone had been paying attention this news comes and no surprise at all.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:They didn't get anything by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      China backed down from what? All they committed to was pausing their retaliatory tariffs.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:They didn't get anything by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Insightful
      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    3. Re:They didn't get anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That list seems to be largely a nothing burger. This is standard Trump "dealmaking". He throws away everything in exchange for a symbolic "victory" that looks good to his base. Everyone with any sense can see that this is not any sort of victory.

    4. Re:They didn't get anything by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Informative

      China agrees to buy more US agriculture products.

      Right, but they bought less US agricultural products in response to the tariff. So, we're back to zero on agriculture as opposed to being in the negative.

      China agrees to make Fentanyl a controlled substance.

      Fentanyl was already a controlled substance. in China. In fact, it's just straight up illegal in China. It's legal in the US with a prescription. So they agreed to... not change their laws?

      China agrees to negotiate on forced technology transfer.

      Ooh, they agreed to discuss things. I mean, yes that's progress. But they did the same discuss the exact same issue under Clinton, W. and Obama. It's what comes out of those talks that matters. And so far we've seen nothing (from any president from Clinton on).

      Yeah, China won on everything, for just a 90 day stay, didn't they?

      Yeah. So far China's given up nothing other than holding off on their retaliation to our tariffs. In return, they made Trump blink. I'd call that winning.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:They didn't get anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China "promises" With no formal agreement.
      China will look into it.
      China was already doing it

      You won bigtime, sick of winning yet?

  49. Re:Life in Prison Mr. President? Enjoy, earned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't know then from than. I'll take my own odds thanks. Trump will rot in prison, Jr. will get at least 15.

  50. BILL YOU LYING TRAITOR! sid=12989868&cid=57734 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    READ WHAT THIS AMAZING LIAR SAYS BELOW! https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12989868&cid=57734842

    THEY lose their jobs, THEIR industry is bailed out with taxpayer funds, BILL the LIAR pretends "nothing happened, probably"! YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP LOL, BUT HE CAN APPARENTLY.

  51. Re:And we all know what a Chinese promise is worth by hackingbear · · Score: 0, Troll

    It is more likely worth more than that of American's.

    - The US recently pulled out from climate change treaty it signed
    - The US recently pulled out from the Iran nuclear it signed, without any concrete evidence that Iran violated the deal
    - The US pulled out from the mid-range missile treaty it has signed with Russia
    - The US failed to pay its UN member dues for years

    Need more examples?

  52. A promise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A promise is of comfort to a fool.

    So how come a Republican Presidents chaos doesn't kill the confidence fairy? Is the market pricing in all this chaos?

  53. Working man playing for wealthy's tax cut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That all these tariffs are.

  54. GO FUCK YOURSELF LYING FAGGOT BILL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're an Idiot-Idiot and Liar-Liar. You want to pretend the bailouts and job losses so far aren't pure losses, they didn't really happen? GO FUCK YOURSELF LYING FAGGOT BILL. Your shit is flapping in the breeze.

  55. Re:And we all know what a Chinese promise is worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Obama" actually had a "lower" "trade imbalance" with "China" than "Trump" who is "right now" headed to Federal "prison" for "life" because he's a "fucking traitor" and "can't stop lying" - FTFY.

    "Faggot."

  56. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Earlier this year and basically ongoing, DERP? https://www.forbes.com/sites/charleswallace1/2018/07/21/chinas-currency-manipulation-is-a-response-to-trumps-tariffs/ -first site off the top of the pile.

    You obviously don't pay attention to this basic shit and are lost in your own asshole.

    "Enter the renminbi. China has allowed the currency to decline 7.6 percent against the dollar in just the last four months. That’s a huge drop, and almost negates Trump’s threatened 10 percent import tariffs on some Chinese products.

    Indeed, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnunchin, usually quite dovish on China trade, said he was now concerned about the renminbi. “There’s no question that the weakening of the currency creates an unfair advantage for them,”

    BUT YOU'RE SIDESTEPPING THE POINT ANYWAY YOU GASLIT MONKEY.

  57. Well you want to leave the WTO anyway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea why not, more trade disruptions can only be good for US business right?
    Just send them all overseas and be done with it. Keep printing money and importing everything until the rest of the world finally notices you are broke.
    You might get a few more years and then can blame the next Democrat when it all falls apart.

  58. Never forget whom you are dealing with. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Xi is
    * a dictator for life
    * sends millions of Chinese to "re-education camps"
    * no freedom of speech
    * no freedom of travel
    * smartphones **Must** have govt tracking software
    * Your social network posts are tracked by the govt and rated. A poor rating can block rights and travel.
    * don't recognize international waters as ruled by world-wide govts
    * Currency manipulation
    * intellectual property stealer / Hacker of companies and govts world-wide
    * Tibet takeover
    * Tienanmen Square; they admit to killing over 1,022 civilians. Other estimates are over 10,000 deaths.
    * Check your server logs, most attacks are probably from Chinese IP ranges.
    * Their elections are fixed - only approved party members can be on the ballot. So, would you like Bernie or Clinton or Gore or Dukakis? Like any of those are even a different choice from the others. Well, freakin' terrible vs really, really, bad is a choice, I suppose.
    * Police in China behave like thugs.
    * Taiwan, cough.

    Don't forget what China is and how they behave.

    1. Re:Never forget whom you are dealing with. by fubarrr · · Score: 1

      Yes he is! And now you are stuck with a begreived dictator for live ruling world's second largest economy till he dies! Excellent!

  59. Re:And we all know what a Chinese promise is worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    - The US did not sign the Paris Climate treaty.
    - The US did not sign any Iran nuclear deal.
    - The US used the agreed upon measures to withdraw from a MRBM treaty that Russia was not compliant with, and China refused to sign.
    - There is no such thing as "UN membership dues". The US pays about $3.3 BILLION dollars to the UN every year. Trump has proposed cutting the US contribution to the UN to $2.1 billion in 2019, but it hasn't happened yet. The UN could, of course, stop spending (embezzling) so much... but then, there would be no reason for most countries to participate.

  60. Re:And we all know what a Chinese promise is worth by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    The first two treaties were not treaties; they were never ratified. They were a handshake by President Obama and carried no weight. The 3rd, well, even the UN couldn't back Russia's desire to keep the treaty in light of their continued violations of the treaty. As far as the UN goes, it was predominantly over the fact we were paying 25% of the entire UN budget, and was re-negotiated down to "just" 22%. It's been underpaid since 1985 - meaning it's been under-paid for 5 previous Presidents, as well as the current President.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  61. Re:Why would China agree to anything in good faith by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Informative

    Trump may not make it to the next election...

    Short of dying, how would he not make it? The Republicans still control the Senate, and the Senate is where Impeachment starts.

    False. Impeachment is what the House does; trial is what the Senate does. The House can impeach President Trump, like they did President Clinton. But unless the Senate votes to convict - it's nothing. A charge, an allegation, a trial - and an acquittal.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  62. Re:And we all know what a Chinese promise is worth by tepples · · Score: 0

    As far as the UN goes, it was predominantly over the fact [Americans] were paying 25% of the entire UN budget, and was re-negotiated down to "just" 22%.

    What fraction of the gross world product is the USA's gross domestic product?

  63. Bloomberg also has a paywall by tepples · · Score: 1

    TFA is paywalled. Here is an alternative article [bloomberg.com].

    Bloomberg also has a (metered) paywall, and I believe Slashdot has linked to enough stories from Bloomberg in the past 30 days to exceed the limit.

  64. get a real news source moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enter the renminbi. China has stopped the currency from declining more than 7.6 percent against the dollar in just the last four months.
    Markets had anticipated at least 10%
    Lucky China is continuing to keep its currency strong in the face of economic pressures.

    1. Re:get a real news source moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Markets had anticipated at least 10%" True, some said as much as 15, but any amount IS MANIPULATION and if Trump were serious he'd address it. He's not, this was all a sham-wazoo.

      EXCEPT AMERICAN INDUSTRIES LOST JOBS AND MONEY, and the strategy turned out to be bar napkin jibberish that he casts off for a 90 day no sex fest.

  65. Re:And we all know what a Chinese promise is worth by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

    Good point! It's about 15% and falling. We should push for another cut in our share of UN costs...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  66. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So let me see if I understand this correctly since I'm a conservative on many things and of course anti-man made climate change. Trump meets with Xi and they do some initial negotiating to end the trade war between countries.

    1. Both sides agree to a 90-day trade truce.
    2. The USA for now has agreed to not raise the tariffs to 25% on $200 billion worth of Chinese product in January.
    3. China has agree to negotiate disagreements on technology transfer, intellectual property and agriculture.
    4. China will agree to purchase (total value currently unknown) of agricultural, energy, industrial, and other product from the United States to reduce the trade imbalance.
    5. China plans to designate Fentanyl as a controlled substance. *Note: I suffer from Chronic Pain after three failed back surgeries and also suffer from a neurological disorder that the doctors can't figure out. I was on Fentanyl for 5 years at 100mg every 3 days. I've been clean for over a year thanks to the Cleveland Clinic. I continue to suffer side effects from Fentanyl that I'm told may never go away. It has caused my family unbelievable hardship since I was force to retire from IT in Aug. 2014 because I could barely walk at that point and ended up in bed for about 3 years until I got in the Cleveland Clinic, the program's cost was unbelievable but worth it.
    6. Both sides have agreed to try and complete the process within 90 days.
    7. Furthermore, all the G-20 countries have admitted that there are issues with trade and improvements need to be made. They all agreed to submit reforms to the World Trade Org.

    But according to you, Trump caved in for peanuts. I find it interesting that every time President Trump does negotiations over trade issues the USA sees improvements. Yet.....you and some on the left claim otherwise. The reality is that under President Trump we have seen improvements in trade and there is nothing that anyone on the left can claim otherwise.

    I find it interesting that the many on the left keep demanding that President Trump needs to be impeached and put in jail. Yet, these same individuals forget one simple thing: Just wait until a future Democrat becomes President. The door has been left opened and the right will pull the same crap to a Democrat President as has been done to President Trump.

    Turnabout is fair play after all.

    -Geekpoet

  67. Re: And we all know what a Chinese promise is wort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, who would have thought ousting a country's elected leader and installing a puppet dictator who allowed western corporations to steal resources would upset Iranians so badly?

  68. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by dryeo · · Score: 2

    I particularly like how he put some of the worst stuff from the TPP into NAFTA2, knowing his base would be fine with it. Other then that, well he did delay GM closing a bunch of plants until the CUSMA was sure to be signed. Note that GM isn't closing any Mexican plants, instead they'll ramp up production down there and pay the small penalties for under paying the Mexican workers.
    And considering how well America has done on the ISDS shit, why would you or Trump want it removed?

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  69. secret leaked information by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    I'm not supposed to tell you guys this but...
    They agreed to throw in the lead paint coating for free on all their toys. Lead is expensive. It's a really good deal.

    1. Re:secret leaked information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free lead! Thank you!! Goods, yes. Clever. If you think the tariffs arent working or the economy sucks, just ask Amazon what is wrong. As a global corporation of tremendous power and authority, they could tell you straight out what is wrong. Why do you think the president invited Bezos to literally every trade conference? Look, at the end of the day, the US can just import whatever it wants through intermediaries, like eastern europe. The US would LIKE to have a better relationship with China but frankly, how difficult is it to make plastic toys to sell at discount retailers? It would take time to ramp up the factories, but it could be done. Exactly right. Nothing was ever ratified in spite of best efforts by heads of state. People who say there was ought to be looking for the signature. Pushing women to the point they feel like abortions are necessary, rather than a right that may need to be exercised from time to time is seriously fucked up. On point about US not signing any of those agreements, etc. Funny. I bet the negotiations to this point have actually led to a lot of almost breakthroughs on many talking points. They might be rid of him in that time. I think you can trust China to know what is in their best interests and act accordingly Filter error: Please use fewer 'junk' characters

  70. Re: And we all know what a Chinese promise is wort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Love your sig.

  71. What currency manipulation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What currency manipulation?
    You must be the delusional one if you think China keeping it;s currency strong instead of letting market forces lower it, is bad for the US...

    Like the other people said, you must just be trolling.

  72. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps you need to read more news and stop cherry picking. What pronouncements did the Treasury Dept. later say, let's say in October 2018? They basically said China WAS NOT CURRENCY MANIPULATING. If short sellers decide to short the Euro yuan, there's not much you can do about it, sure you can defend against it, but isn't that just mere manipulation as well? It wasn't China simply setting a peg rate lower, or other techniques e.g. China buying US bonds to manipulate the currency downwards. There was no bump in US bonds buying, if so US interest rates would go down idiot... That clearly hasn't been happening.

  73. Depends what they do with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's further developed, it's a good thing.

    If they just rent seek from it, the profits just go overseas and it's a loss.
    Better to have a local rent seeker. There is a chance they may spend the money in your economy.

    1. Re:Depends what they do with it. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      If they just rent seek from it, the profits just go overseas and it's a loss.

      The Chinese buying American real estate are not repatriating their profits.

      The main point of buying property in America is to have a safe bolthole in case of political or financial turmoil in China. China has strict capital controls, so if you finally get your money out, the last thing you would want to do is send it back.

    2. Re: Depends what they do with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a great place to raise a kid. /s

      If I was your kid and you had me in china, I would disown you if I ever felt American freedoms. You should be arrested for putting a family in those vile conditions.

  74. Re: Why would China agree to anything in good fai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And for now, that "weight" is not about just invading countries, unlike some other superpowers.

  75. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Just wait until a future Democrat becomes President. The door has been left opened and the right will pull the same crap to a Democrat President as has been done to President Trump.

    Turnabout is fair play after all"

    Oh go fuck yourself you rightwing nutbar whiner. The GOP impeached Clinton over a blowjob but will happily suck Trump off despite him being a known philander, having paid off at least several women and boasted both about deliberately walking in on half-naked teens and on groping women.

  76. Switch on brain before next post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    The rich became fabulously wealthy BEFORE Trump's tariffs. The rich, whose companies make giant piles of cash making stuff in China with sklave labor and then selling it into the US at prices they would charge with US labor LOVED the Obama years and the likes of Bloomberg, Gates, Buffet, Soros, Cook, Steyer, are ALL opposed to Trump and his tariffs. None of those billionaires gives a damn about American workers; they get rich closing American plants and shifting the work offshore where possible and then using H1-B holders to depress the wages and benefits of Americans in jobs that cannot be outsourced.

    American wages are increasing (slightly) with the Trump tariffs in place, for the first time in over 20 years.

    The only American workers harmed by the tariffs so far are:
    1. The rich, who are seeing their proft margins reduced.
    2. Those who make a living importing Chinese crap at expense of other American workers.
    3. Those who make money assisting in shipping jobs to China, at the expense of their fellow Americans.
    4. Those who make things the Chinese are retaliating against (like soy bean farmers). Trump has proposed financial aid for those being harmed by the Chinese retaliation - and such assistance can easily be afforded because the Chinese buy so little from the US that their retaliation is very limited in scope. The assistance would be of limited duration anyway, since farmers can do different crops next season and also the trade fight is not likely to last.

    By definition, the Chinese would be hurt far more by any trade fight with the US since they had already imposed all their trade restrictions against the US over the past decades and as a result they ship vastly more into the US than the US ships into China. This is the downside to policies like China has been implementing - there's little room to make things worse in a fight. China's over-the-top bad trade practices have served them very well for over 20 years as long as the US was lead by idiot presidents like Bush and Obama who refused to stand up for America and its workers. Both Bush and Obama did whatever the ultra-rich investor class told them to do, and they told the American workers to get used to "the new normal" of bad wages, poor growth, and reduced opportunities.

    It's taken Trump, a businessman, to return a glimmer of recognition of the basic laws of economics to the federal government.

  77. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didn't kill the TPP. It went on without the US.

  78. Common Problem by speedplane · · Score: 1

    There are so many unfair trade practices that China is involved in, and the U.S. has been begrudgingly accepting of them for years. If you're a business owner, how could you possibly plan for anything if Trump changes his mide ever 4 weeks.

    --
    Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
    1. Re:Common Problem by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Use non-Chinese sources where possible?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  79. Anyone who doesn't understand basic econ 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And you are completely missing the point you Trumpanzee.
    US dollars have been going up against all currencies, many a lot more than Yuan.
    China's currency is under pressure because of the tariffs, of course when an economy is doing poorly the currency will decrease. It's the whole point of a floating currency you nincompoop.

    Anyone who doesn't understand these simple basic econ 101 facts. Should in no way be telling other people to pay attention...

    Anyone who didn't expect the Yuan to naturally fall when you fuck with their economy, has no place talking about economics. The only people who are pretending to be surprised are doing it for other obvious reasons. IE pulling the wool even further over your eyes.

  80. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THEY SAID THAT TO ALLOW TRUMPO TO HAVE BARGAINING ROOM AND NOT INFLAME THEM AHEAD OF THE TALKS, IF YOU READ MORE.

    They literally said as much in an interview, that because China had made no moves in the last few weeks they specifically weren't going to raise that point.

    If you don't read that, DO NOT KNOW WHAT CHINA ACTUALLY DID, and you think China is doing nothing because the WH Treasury declined to say that when asked? YOU ARE A MORON!

  81. Re:Life in Prison Mr. President? Enjoy, earned. by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 1

    typical answer from someone such as yourself. Can't refute so you attack a spelling mistake. Textbook really.

  82. Re:Life in Prison Mr. President? Enjoy, earned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Can't refute " "you are more likely to win the publishers clearing house giveaway which has nearly a 1 in 1.7 billion odds then Trumper ever seeing 1 day in jail" = Not a fact. #Refuted, bitch

  83. 1 jin = 604.8g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 jin = 500g

    http://hiwave.starrygift.com/2...

    1 jin = 604.8g

    1. Re:1 jin = 604.8g by mermeid007 · · Score: 1

      That's the spirit - bring on those significant digits!

    2. Re:1 jin = 604.8g by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      1 jin = 604.8g

      Wrong. The PRC jin is exactly 500 grams.

      The old standard of 604.8 grams is occasionally used in Hong Kong and Taiwan, but not in mainland China.

  84. China hasn't signed anything either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was some dude who claims they're in charge did it. And apparently that doesn't count. So china has nothing to worry about: THEY didn't sign.

  85. Trump blinked in the fight he started by Martin+S. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How much more evidence is required to conclude Trump is not the brilliant 'deal' strategist he thinks he is. He's failed with North Korea, his attempt to sabotage NAFTA also failed, he failed to intimidate the EU and now he's failed to get a better deal from China, which despite his bluster is pretty much the status quo with tweeks that regular diplomats could achieve in a heartbeat without any drama.

    1. Re:Trump blinked in the fight he started by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the diplomats had eight years under Obama to make such a deal. Does your heart beat once every eight years?

      Stage IV TDS.

    2. Re: Trump blinked in the fight he started by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, NK saber rattling is much quieter these days, NAFTA is all but renegotiated as of Friday, and is waiting on Congress. Seems like he's winning on those fronts at least.

    3. Re:Trump blinked in the fight he started by guruevi · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if you missed something watching only-CNN but on all those fronts the US is doing pretty well. NK has backed down, the EU has backed down and is even agreeing to the UK exit and now China is backing down.

      China and NK know very well that their military strength is still nothing compared to the US, we could bring one or two carrier strike groups and literally disable the entire Chinese navy (1 severely technologically deficient aircraft carrier in the entire country), the US doesn't even have to land troops. Obama had forgotten that (or too afraid to use the option, Obama even refused to aid in a backwater state like Syria for fear of conflict), Trump seems to know that and has indicated willingness to use any option he has to help his 'negotiations'.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:Trump blinked in the fight he started by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have Trump Derangement Syndrome and would criticize Trump no matter what he did. He's made more progress on trade and North Korea than all previous presidents combined. Thank God wicked Hillary isn't president.

  86. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very astute, especially the fourth and sixth items. Its not like hes against the rest of the world. Wanting good things for america immediately gets these instinctive reactions that say he wants to hurt the rest of the world. Good points. Don't forget that a good trade deal (good to whoever is the decider) results in profits for the Chinese and US governments, companies, investors, and everyone involved in the deal over time. That's why you didn't see some kind of simple tariff being placed and left at that. There is real (not merely expected) value in a deal and trump isnt just going to do what various influencers who dont have to back up their complaints tell him he should do. That explains the approach. The chinese government took significant steps toward cracking down on gang activity in the last few months. They will not tolerate that stuff. They want free trade just as much as the US, for the most part, other than some low level protective tariffs they want to keep in place so the US doesn't drain every valuable asset from them. At least, I believe that is how they put it. That is why their diplomats have been pushing for better designed teams to negotiate with the US. Notice how there is never any good news unless Xi and Trump actually talk? That's because the diplomats on each side don't know how to negotiate tariffs and they need to expand those talks so they can discuss the important elements of trade versus just hollering about soybeans and farm subsidies. The only people who are thinking victory or defeat are people who want something they are not entitled to. Like thinking people buy stuff because the packaging is good. Putting good packaging on a bad product doesn't work. Putting good packaging on a great product works great. The 90 day cooloff period, or whatever the hell you want to call it only works if chinese gangs and their like cant insert crazy profits into the mix, which is stupid because inadverdently, chinese gangs actually participate in the trade process for some good, but their other activities make it seems like they are total freeloaders. He wants both our people and the chinese to start thinking about what really matters long-term, which is both economies. Trade relationships exist only for this reason, and other kinds of diplomatic relationships - valuable for other reasons - that have cropped up are getting in the way of trade. Keep it simple. If China is buying a widget that is expected to create revenue for a chinese company or a US company is buying a widget from china that creates revenue for them, be honest about it. Diplomatic dinner parties are not the product. They are merely how the products are sold and negotiations happen.

  87. Re:And we all know what a Chinese promise is worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering who's at the other side of the table, the Chinese wouldn't be the party I would be worried about.

  88. Just a start, more to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russian bots and poorly educated commentards like to accuse the US of being evil but they cannot deny that China occupied Mongolia and Tibet and has designs on Taiwan and the shipping lanes of the South China sea. They forget China wants part of Vietnam too.

    The tariffs are only a starting point for negotiation. The US should require Chinese importers to the US to use non-Chinese flagged ships. They should require 100% inspection with attention to intellectual property, content (no melamine in protein, lead in jewelry, etc), and standards (no equipment claiming to meet Energy Star standards that doesn't). The costs should not be subsidised as they are now by the Customs service. This will raise costs of Chinese imports but needs to be done. Nothing should be released into the market until all fees are paid.

    The US should remove all Chinese internet points of presence in the US. They have proven time and again that they cannot be trusted. They should make it easy for browser users to remove all Chinese certificate authorities and require it in any government or financial or health institutions.

    They should require the Chinese to float the yuan.

    For those that think the US is imperialist, do you think the Chinese will be a better friend when they are in the position the US has been in for the last half century?

  89. Re: Trump caves for peanuts by dextarz · · Score: 1

    LOL... the âforceâ(TM) is strong with some guys..

  90. Fuck intellectual property by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the US were serious about economic growth, it would lower those barriers to innovation at least as far as China does, rather than trying to drag China into the same stupid trap.

  91. Re:Revisionist history taught by illiterate retard by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    The US is the #2 manufacturing nation in the world. Manufacturing jobs are being lost because of automation, not any other reason.

  92. Re:Why would China agree to anything in good faith by mrclevesque · · Score: 2

    I like the Mexico 15$ minimum wage but for the rest I'm not sure.

    1) The US trade deficit with China is still on a solid increase.
    https://www.census.gov/foreign...

    2) On Nafta, all I remember is GM closing shop when it might have been put off and US manufactures paying more for steel.

    And Trump may talk like China's policies are unjust to the US, but in his personal life he calls that kind of behavior a good business sense.

  93. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by atrex · · Score: 1

    Trump "renegotiated" NAFTA as basically the same deal with a few minor tweaks - no significant overhaul to agriculture or manufacturing imports. Who wants to bet that whatever trade deal (if any) gets signed with China is going to be an almost mirror image of the TPP named the US China Agreement or something?

    Remember, there's a world of other places for China to get it's soybeans and other agricultural products, and all of Europe, Asia, and the rest of the Americas to ship it's smart devices to. It's US producers and consumers that are primarily being hurt by Trump's tariffs, not China.

    Negotiating from a place of strength is smart business tactics, but that's not where the US is right now. We have nothing China needs that they can't find elsewhere.

  94. This should be the ONE thing he does well by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Putting big deal together is the one thing Trump has done well. He changes my stomach, so I'd hope we'd at least get some good dealsfrom his presidency.

    Actually one other thing he does well - drumming up publicity, getting press.

  95. I should have used preview. Horrible typing by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Let's try that again:

    Putting big deals together is the one thing Trump has done well in his life. He churns my stomach, so I'd hope we'd at least get some good deals from his presidency.

    Actually one other thing he does well - drumming up publicity, getting press. Being President comes with automatic press, though, so his penchant for getting attention isn't something I'd expect the country to benefit from.

  96. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by bobbied · · Score: 2

    Exacty. And this is precisely why we need to impeach and get Hillary in for the last 18 months. Pelosi will nominate her.

    LOL.. How many folks will we have to burn though to get to Hillary in the presidential succession rules? Let's see, the VP all of congress, all of the cabinet and a pile of federal employees... I think I'm in line before Hillary...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  97. Re:And we all know what a Chinese promise is worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    though they usually know the names of both their parents unlike Americans.

  98. Re:And we all know what a Chinese promise is worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's GWP adjusted for PPP. This graph shows us what percentage of foreign goods the United States can purchase with existing levels of economic output. US GDP / GWP(non-adjusted) is about 20%, which is where it has been for quite some time. The US has about as much economic output as the whole of the EU.

  99. Re: Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Trump caves for peanuts"

    While obama continues to do nothing at all.

  100. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    any tiny step he makes in the process compares favourably against the steps of every administration before him for the last 5 odd decades.

    Wow. Just wow. I know people are sometimes blind to the past but this is some next level shit right here. Put on your blinders and turned in so far you can't even see the road in front of you let alone the one you've left in the past.

    Enjoy America while it lasts. This will not end the way you think. Hell it already isn't working the way you think.

  101. Re: Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. He did. Again.

  102. Re:And we all know what a Chinese promise is worth by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

    So then our share of the UN budget should be cut from 22% to 20%. Either way - we're overpaying...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  103. Re: Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm hoping Donald and Hillary share a cell with a webcam so we can watch them bring prison sex to a new level.

  104. Re: Trump caves for peanuts by clovis · · Score: 1

    I think I'm in line before Hillary

    Well now, when the time comes, you better be ready to step up to the plate. We're counting on you.

  105. Trust... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is letting your sworn enemy feed you.

  106. Re: Trump caves for peanuts by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Neither are Apple keyboards. Your point is...?

    --
    No sig today...
  107. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USA the KNOWN currency manipulator ...

    what do you think the point of quantitative easing 1, 2 3 and 4 was?

  108. Re: This is very good. Double down Mr President... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well not yours yet shilling for big nuke.

  109. The agreed to come to the table by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFA:

    intellectual property theft, non-tariff barriers and cyber theft

    China has been screwing the west for a long time. Try building anything in China - Chinese factories and markets are essentially closed to outsiders unless you partner with a domestic producer, hire domestic labor, transfer knowledge and patents to the domestic producer and only agree to manufacture for export.

    Do you honestly believe China's industrial revolution only took about 20 years due to the efforts of the Chinese on their own?

    The reason their industrial revolution didn't take 100 years is due to western intellectual property transfer. What did the west get in return?

    Cheaply manufactured Chinese junk.

    1. Re:The agreed to come to the table by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      intellectual property theft, non-tariff barriers and cyber theft

      I agree all those are issues. But this doesn't solve any of them. All Trump got was the agreement to talk about those issues. Which Clinton got, W. got and Obama got. Nothing came out of those talks then, and nothing has come out of Trump's policies either.

      TL;DR this isn't a solution. Call me when he actually solves a problem.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  110. We're Jim Jonesed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So those of us who didn't drink the kool aid need to either lay down like we're dead until everybody else is, or run our asses the fuck outta dodge before we end up like the rest of them. Trying to save them or convince them otherwise (on both sides of the fence) is impossible, and all that is left is for the rationally minded americans to GTFO and if they really care, take back some of their country after it has collapsed. Because what's been going on here since Columbine is not what I want my children raised in. And yes, that covers a lot of shifts in power over the past 20 years.

  111. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump didn't end NAFTA he rebranded it. Similarly his goal is renegotiate TPP to ensure his investment interests are included. His requirements on H-1Bs are only part of his xenophobic drive to decrease the number of ethnic and racial minorities in the country.

    A vote for a 2nd term of this clown is a continuation of the movement towards the balkanization of the USA.

  112. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They said that because they couldn't find anything that lead one to think that the Chinese government was directly manipulating the currency downward. Where's the the evidence? Why don't you show it by posting an actual article.

    If you don't have the mental capacity to understand basic finance and economics, then please stop discussing it. It's pretty clear you don't understand basic concepts regarding how currency is traded or valued.

  113. Now is the time, americans by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    Put pressure on your congressmen to stop NAFTA! Trump getting out of NAFTA before NAFTA2 comes into effect will mean you have a real chance to not only stop NAFTA2, but to stop NAFTA in one fell stroke! Call your congressmen! Get everyone you know to call your congressmen! NAFTA can finally be stopped!

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  114. Re:Why would China agree to anything in good faith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit, Trump got a 90 day period of JACK SHIT and you're just another lying faggot.

  115. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    Of course he DID cave by limiting his hand, and of course he could not really possibly have already removed the tariffs by now anyway so using that as evidence he didn't cave is typical Shanghai dishonesty again.

    It is widely being reported that way, but the details say he actually gave a "cease-fire" as a 90-day ultimatum to meet all his listed demands; no new tariffs if a deal is made within 90 days. Well golly, if a deal was made, at any time, there would not be new tariffs. So it isn't really much of anything except a delay of announced tariffs to see if a deal is really close. Which it probably is not.

    Everybody is running in circles trying to figure out what their "side" is supposed to echo, and few even seem to have noticed the details of what happened. ;) Or what didn't.

  116. Re:Why would China agree to anything in good faith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eh.

    1. Of course it is. Decades of exporting industry isn't going to turn on a dime.

    2. GM is a shit company and deserved to die years ago when it was about to keel over. Unlike the banks, taxpayers really didn't make bank on bailing out General Mediocrity.

  117. Re: Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If an impeachment occurs and he's found guilty of something, Pence takes over. Besides, Hillary has been a total bitch for the past 40 years, which was shortly after the last time her cooch received any attention from anyone. Chelsea had to be artificially inseminated from a dental dam that one of Bill's interns used.

  118. Re: Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump would have to do her in the butt. The other hole is too much of a biohazard.

  119. Good to be proven right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about all the facts you forgot to mention?
    A lot more were lost than it saved.
    World growth was slowed
    , and the US markets lost all it's gains for a year.
    Oh and your trade deficit got worse,
    along with your budget.

    Only a late rally, because the market thinks the tariffs will end makes it even close.

    But as deniers do, pick and choose the stats you want to believe in and ignore all the others.

    Thanks for confirming Lynnwood Denier.

    1. Re:Good to be proven right. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      The statement was that the markets had lost throughout that year. That is provably false. If you have a problem with it - take it up with the original AC (or yourself).

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re: Good to be proven right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only nominally. Down in real terms

    3. Re:Good to be proven right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The statement was the trade war was a terrible idea. It provably has been, even if you try to cherrypick one stat denier style.
      Even the trade deficit is 10% worse with the tariffs.

      That was the one thing they were supposed to help !!

  120. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A post that is critical, all opinion, and no fact. Yep, its thegarbage again.

  121. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

    A vote for anyone else is a vote for the temporary collaboration between open border idealists and neo-feudalists towards a globalist future. Even politicians who are in their heart nationalist progressives like Sanders and Corbyn get bullied by the media into toeing the globalist line.

    Globalism or Trump, those are the options ... and if you vote globalism, don't be surprised if the neo-feudalists come out on top.

  122. Re:Why would China agree to anything in good faith by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    "1. Of course it is. Decades of exporting industry isn't going to turn on a dime."

    Why it would change as long as US citizens prefer to buy stuff made in China.

    "2. GM is a shit company and deserved to die years ago when it was about to keel over. Unlike the banks, taxpayers really didn't make bank on bailing out General Mediocrity."

    Not saying it's going to die just redirecting it's energies.

    On steel, like years ago for washers and dryers, American suppliers just raised the price of things like rolled steel when Trump stuck tariffs on foreign suppliers, so a few US suppliers hired more workers and raised their profit margins while American companies that buy the steel now have to raise their prices or see their profits drop, and either way become less competitive.

  123. What did you expect would happen? by melted · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I mean. Saudis kill a Saudi in Turkey and we walk away from $500b in deals and abandon the upcoming Yemen peace negotiations? Thatâ(TM)d be utterly retarded, and for all his faults, Trump is most certainly not an idiot.

  124. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    Again with that lie. Clinton was impeached for lying under oath. The technical name is "perjury". And he was guilty of it. He forfeited his license to practice law and a got a $600,000 fine.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  125. Re:Why would China agree to anything in good faith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wow.

    Trump got exactly what he wanted out of the tariff war. Trumps bellicose statements forced both Canada and Mexico to update the NAFTA trade pact.

    Trump declared NAFTA, "the worst trade deal maybe ever signed anywhere." And now some minor changes was all it took to fix it. Talk about moving the goal posts.

  126. China isn't a currency manipulator doofus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are funny.

  127. Whoosh parrot much by Martin+S. · · Score: 1

    I'm British, I get my independent news internationally.

  128. How to be right and still be wrong. by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

    China has maintained anti-competitive and frankly corrupt practices that should have been challenged by the U.S. a long time ago but I guess the economy has been too poor to risk a trade war. Rampant theft of foreign IP and forcing all foreign investors to partner with Chinese companies are huge issues that had to be resolved.

    However, Trump is going absolutely the wrong way about it. Standing up against China unilaterally is a tough go. A multi-lateral negotiation would have been a much better idea but Trump has already declared war on our allies such as Canada, the EU, Britain, and South Korea. Moreover, TPP isn't popular here on Slashdot or Reddit but it was about a compromise that would replace a worse status quo or alternative. The biggest benefit of TPP was to keep China out of the region. We would also have enforced some sort of labor protection laws. And by enforcing IP regimes in the affected nations in return for open markets in the US for their goods, we would have create a market for our IP owners in those markets. A unified marketplace would have resisted China's advances.

    But now we are alone standing up to China, when we could have stood up to them with other major economic powers, while locking out avenues of Chinese economic expansion in the region.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  129. Re:Why would China agree to anything in good faith by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

    1. The problem is that car manufacturing will simply move out of the USMCA region into China, especially smaller, lower-cost cars that do better in Europe, anyway. Manufacturers will simply build cars in China using parts made in China, and sell the cars to China or the EU.

    2. Milk manufacturers in the U.S. win. Hurray?!

    3. Trump lost on Chapter 19, which he wanted to eliminate. As a result, the international process by which Canada was able to successfully challenge the US rules on softwood lumber stays in place.

    4. No auto tariffs for Mexico and Canada! Yay! But the entire small car industry will be leaving the region anyway.

    So what did Trump win? Could it have been obtained without disrupting the relationship with Canada?

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  130. Re:Why would China agree to anything in good faith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't even look like impeachment anymore, but old fashioned criminal indictment. With Manafort turning tail and ratting out Trump, shortly after Trump's sworn statements to Mueller, a wise bet would be that the FBI will bring criminal indictment on Trump very soon. Even Trump can see the writing on the wall, and unfortunately for him this indictment is 100% pardon proof.

    So it's safe to say that Trump won't be running in 2020, as he will very likely be behind bars for the rest of his life, and not even Pence will be able to pardon him.

  131. Re:Trump caves for peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you graduate 8th grade and have a a better understanding of how the world works, I hope you'll reread your posts and laugh at how ridiculously naive you were at this time in your life :) When you grow up you'll realize that Trump was the KING of neo-feudalists; the evidence is literally everywhere, and he outright admits it several times a week, on video and on his twitter.

    When the dots connect for you and you realize your entire worldview was a neo-feudalist lie, we'll be here to help you recover, Pinky's Brain.

    CAPTCHA: retard. Wow, even /. captcha system has called you out.

  132. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHAHA