Slashdot Mirror


A Quarter of Tumblr's Users Are There To Consume Porn, Data Scientists Estimate (vice.com)

On Monday, Tumblr announced that it will permanently ban adult content from its platform on December 17th, alienating a large portion of the site's users who enjoy sharing and consuming NSFW content. Motherboard has surfaced a study conducted in 2017 by two Italian universities and Bell Labs, which found that roughly a quarter of Tumblr users were on the platform largely to consume pornography. From the report: This study was based on the behavior of 130 million users, about half of Tumblr's entire user base. Of that number, "adult content consumers are 22 percent of our sample," the study said. "At the time of the study, roughly 30 million active accounts were consuming adult content, either re-sharing it or following the accounts of those producers," Luca Aiello, one of the study's authors and now a senior research scientist at Nokia Bell Labs told Motherboard in an email. "I expect this audience to experience a noticeable drop in engagement: some of them will just churn out, many of them will likely reduce considerably the time spent on the platform."

Another 28 percent, or roughly 40 million users, encountered pornography unintentionally on Tumblr. That means they didn't seek out the porn, but they followed someone who pushed it into their feed. "The extent of this exposure is hard to estimate but it's probably not major," Aiello said. "Therefore, I believe some people in this segments would be happy to have a cleaner Tumblr feed but I don't expect a significant lift in their engagement, overall." Crucially, the study found that Tumblr's userbase was more female than many social networks ("we estimate that the average user age is 26 and 72 percent of the users are female," they wrote.) They found that these demographics held up between porn consumers and non porn consumers on the site, and that, in fact, young women between the ages of 20-25 were consuming porn on the site at a higher rate than young men. This means that Tumblr's crackdown will likely disproportionately affect women porn consumers.

119 comments

  1. "Tumblr users are jackoffs, study concludes" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    File that under Shit : No

    1. Re: "Tumblr users are jackoffs, study concludes" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they speak English?

    2. Re: "Tumblr users are jackoffs, study concludes" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not really, they've invented a new language which has 57 gender neutral pronouns for each actual English pronoun.

    3. Re: "Tumblr users are jackoffs, study concludes" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >they

      You TRANSPHOBIC ABLEIST M*LE-ENABLING SHITLO- fuck it I can't be bothered satirizing them today.

  2. Low estimate. by Narcocide · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're being polite. They mean definitely no less than one quarter. The problem with a community built like Tumblr was the intent to blur the line between dialogue, art, and pornography. Mind you, even pornographers are opposed to this, because it also destroys their profit model. This new profit model still requires pornography to survive, but does so in a non-obvious way that appeals better to the subliminal.

    1. Re:Low estimate. by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait... there's a profit model for posting porn to tumblr? Why don't we just remove copyright protection completely for porn, then there will be no motivation to create more of it, and they'll stop exploiting people. Don't know why people think I'm stupid when I suggest that...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re: Low estimate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... porn, girls or some third thing? Iâ(TM)m quite sure there is a huge difference. Iâ(TM)m off to the Carly Rae Jepsen concert.

    3. Re:Low estimate. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      News to data scientists: nobody cares.

    4. Re:Low estimate. by Daemonik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeaaaah.. people will just completely stop wanting to show off their having sex or watching people having sex.. not. Porn has survived when mere possession was enough to get jail time, it survived when copyright indeed did not extend to porn and it was bootlegged as much if not more even when you had to copy 8mm film negatives. It'll survive the fall of Tumblr.

    5. Re:Low estimate. by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      And among those who followed someone who pushed adult content to their feed, they make the bold assumption that there would be an issue. Were they looking for a pair of fantastic breasts? No, they are too classy for that but if the perfect pair happens to flit across their feed I doubt they are upset about it.

    6. Re:Low estimate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't we just remove copyright protection completely for porn

      Pretty sure there's nearly zero consideration for copyrights on porn already. Exhibits A and B: Every adult *tube site and about half of Reddit.

      It's even worse trying to enforce porn copyrights in the world outside the USA, because normal people don't particularly care if people know what they look at and are less likely to settle based on a blackmail letter. It actually has to go to court.

    7. Re:Low estimate. by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      I don't quite get your motivation to get rid of porn.

      The talent in porn is only exploited when A: it's illegal and they don't enjoy labor laws that give them leverage or B: there's so much talent around that their salaries crash.

      In case of A the best thing is for the government and the people to not be prudish hypocrites.

      Im case of B it's the same issie we're seeing everywhere else and I don't see many people wanting to make cubible work illegal because it's basically abuse.

    8. Re:Low estimate. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Legally difficult. Firstly because it can be hard to define porn, but mostly because it would be in violation of various binding international agreements.

    9. Re: Low estimate. by houghi · · Score: 3, Funny

      I get off on tthe naked women painted by cavemen. Porn in its purest form.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    10. Re: Low estimate. by houghi · · Score: 2

      I will tell you if it is porn. Just show it to me--everybody

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:Low estimate. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why don't we just remove copyright protection completely for porn

      A good portion of this is simply Tumblr linking to existing pictures online.

      then there will be no motivation to create more of it

      Please cite an example for where this has worked for anything ever.

      Don't know why people think I'm stupid when I suggest that...

      The mind that created a problem can't not solve the problem. It's no surprise why you don't know why.

    12. Re:Low estimate. by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Why don't we just remove copyright protection completely for porn, then there will be no motivation to create more of it ...

      Who TF pays for porn? There is enough free stuff on the web that you could watch it 24/7 and never see the same stuff twice, although, of course, of course, I'm not speaking from experience.

      Anyway there would still be porn, paid for or not; plenty of people will get a kick out of making it, and plenty of people are exhibitionists.

    13. Re: Low estimate. by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, even exists in original 3D !!!

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    14. Re:Low estimate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who TF pays for porn?

      Anyone without an adblocker? The site may have ads - in the best case for some of the implements & clothes you see in the porn. Worst case, they run a javascript bitcoin miner in your browser, & puts your machine in some botnet. Botnets access is sold for real money.

    15. Re:Low estimate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure there's nearly zero consideration for copyrights on porn already. Exhibits A and B: Every adult *tube site and about half of Reddit.

      An astonishingly large number of them are all owned by the same provider too, who is even frequently getting into production. Go google Mindgeek and see for yourself.

    16. Re:Low estimate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      two reasons.

      1) voyeurs and exhibitionists, some people will always want to watch other people having sex and others will want to be watched while having sex

      2) copyright protection is bullshit in most cases as any art is just a remix of previous art before it, Writen, musical or visual.

      But that being said it may actually stop the exploitation of people or on the other hand it may make people realize that the ones they assume are being exploited are actually enjoying themselves and not everyone is a prude.

      So there will always be a reason for creating it (people are freaky little fuckers) but i am curious to know how many people are actually being exploited in porn versus the people being accused of being exploited by other people who are just simply more prudish. I also don't think you are stupid for saying it, maybe a bit of a prude and pretty naive but that can always be fixed with some really fun experiences ;)

    17. Re: Low estimate. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Rather naive of you to assume you're going to enjoy seeing ALL the porn, isn't it? Do the words "goatse" and "tubgirl" mean anything to you? I've seen stuff that had permanently diminished my life... and it was pretty hard to wank to too!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    18. Re:Low estimate. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Porn has non-zero production costs. SOMEBODY must be paying something, or NONE of it would exist. I just question the business model of "We'll give you all the porn you want for as long as you want for free just to get you hooked on it so you'll start paying someday."

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    19. Re: Low estimate. by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

      I get off on the naked women painted by cavemen

      You like SKELETON porn? Man, I knew you were weird, but ... ;-)

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    20. Re: Low estimate. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      Those ain't pr0n

    21. Re:Low estimate. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      it would be in violation of various binding international agreements.

      I don’t think the US will have any problem violating that international agreement

  3. sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    tumblr = porn and anorexic chicks (who eventually turn to porn).

    twitter = SJWs and people about to get fucked up by SJWs

    hacker news = silicon valley douchebag 10x ninja rockstar brogrammers and indians

    slashdot = intelligentsia and APK

    1. Re:sounds about right by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      How deplorable.

    2. Re:sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hn sucks so fucking bad

    3. Re:sounds about right by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      You forgot 4 Chan = slashdot after dark.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    4. Re:sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot 4 Chan = slashdot after dark.

      Hard day in the server mines. Let me just loosen my shirt collar and untuck my neckbeard. Pour myself a bourbon and Mt. Dew. Time for some 4chan LoliPony action.

      "Hey Mom, I'm going online so don't use the phone! Knock first if you're coming down! Big 'dungeon raid' with my 'friends'. This will take a few hours."

  4. Twice as many watched the porn and didn't share by raymorris · · Score: 2

    TFS says:

    --
    roughly 30 million active accounts were consuming adult content, either re-sharing it or following the accounts of those producers
    --

    Do YOU "share" the porn YOU watch, or just watch it?
    I'd definitely bet less than half the people checking out porn shared it or "followed" the pornster. Just browse the porn, do your thing, and move on. (But please wash your hands).

    So about half of their users or more are there for porn.

    1. Re:Twice as many watched the porn and didn't share by quenda · · Score: 1

      You mean some people only read it for the articles?

    2. Re:Twice as many watched the porn and didn't share by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Do YOU "share" the porn YOU watch, or just watch it?

      Just watch it, but you don't understand the Tumblr system. Blogs there are not usually generic often covering very specific content and catering to every fetish known to man (or woman for that matter). That means when you browse and find something you like the easiest way to get updates on that content is to "follow" the poster of the content.

      Resharing is irrelevant. "Following" is not. It's the difference between publishing and consuming content.

      To draw a comparison to another social media site by looking at sharing you're effectively doing the equivalent of determining who is friends with whom on Facebook purely by looking to see if someone has posted on someone else's wall rather than actually looking at their friend's list.

      But what they did ignore are those people who don't have accounts but still browse the site. I'm sure there's lots of porn figures there and they are likely higher than those willing to create accounts for this purpose.

    3. Re:Twice as many watched the porn and didn't share by war4peace · · Score: 1

      (But please wash your hands).

      Before or after? "Both" is not an option.

      I never used tumblr regularly, sometimes I was sent there by some link or whatever, but went there after reading this article. Main page sucks, uses sndless scrolling an it's the same 10 or so entries repeating endlessly, with the occasional one-off entry in between. They say the adult content will be banned on December 17th. I searched for adult-related keywords (porn, hentai, adult, sex) - got no results. Looks like they started early with the banning.

      Oh well... not that there isn't porn anywhere else.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  5. /Oblg. Pics or it didn't happen! =P by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    n/t

  6. thats the only reason I go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just saying

  7. Well that means by fred911 · · Score: 1

    They're usage is more family friendly than the majority us of internet usage.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Well that means by fred911 · · Score: 1

      They're = their damn autocorrect

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  8. And the other 3/4th.... by Noishkel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... are just too shy to admit it.

    And perhaps more seriously though the study does specially states that the aforementioned 28% are there largely to browse porn. Which at least suggest while that remaining 72% are not there just for the porn we don't know how much of them still do use the site for it's adult content.

    Ultimately I believe this is a sign of Tumblrs impending collapse, given that this entire situation stems from the fact that their administration was too technological inept to properly administer their site so they just decided to discard a large part of their user-base instead of just fixing the problem.

    1. Re:And the other 3/4th.... by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      ... are just too shy to admit it.

      And perhaps more seriously though the study does specially states that the aforementioned 28% are there largely to browse porn. Which at least suggest while that remaining 72% are not there just for the porn we don't know how much of them still do use the site for it's adult content.

      Also quite critically this was a study based on the actual user accounts. Given that you don't need an account to browser tumblr and can just as easily fall down the linked rabbit hole from one blog to the next with and without an account it would stand to reason that the "traffic" associated with porn is far larger than what was covered in the study.

      Combined with the fact that users typically are less likely to create an account purely for pornographic purposes I do wonder if the number of Tumblr's "readers" consuming porn is far higher than the number of Tumblr "users" in terms of percentages.

    2. Re:And the other 3/4th.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... are just too shy to admit it.

      And perhaps more seriously though the study does specially states that the aforementioned 28% are there largely to browse porn. Which at least suggest while that remaining 72% are not there just for the porn we don't know how much of them still do use the site for it's adult content.

      Ultimately I believe this is a sign of Tumblrs impending collapse, given that this entire situation stems from the fact that their administration was too technological inept to properly administer their site so they just decided to discard a large part of their user-base instead of just fixing the problem.

      Tumblr could have banned porn, and also made a clone of their app / website / whatever, maybe call it Cumblr, and don't provide it on the app store. This would have been the best solution for all their users, but an executive probably complained about somehow not making a profit this way.

    3. Re:And the other 3/4th.... by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      It doesn't sound like there actually is a problem. The big mistake I see here is ever choosing to hear anything about tumbler and porn, if they hadn't done that they could maintain tumbler as a legitimate site and not a porn site. As it is all those ladies will go somewhere else they can pretend they aren't looking at porn.

    4. Re:And the other 3/4th.... by G00F · · Score: 1

      months back, they started forcing users to have an account to view sites with adult content. Think they gained accounts, but lost over all users with that move. Or people shifted to sites that were not flagged as being adult content.

      But this move, will surly be felt by tumblr. It's a move I think they where forced to.

      --
      The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
    5. Re:And the other 3/4th.... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      months back, they started forcing users to have an account to view sites with adult content.

      You're right, I have an account too. I also have zero followers, am following no one and I do wonder where in the statistics I fit in. Bookmarks still work, you just need to be logged into a dummy account.

      Errr my friend, not me. I wouldn't know anything about this at all. Move along now, nothing to see here. Oh look an elephant....

  9. Tublr hosts porn? by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    I didnt know, and we only got 10 days to check it out. Sounds like more of an add to me lol.

    --
    [($)]
    1. Re:Tublr hosts porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does one go to see it?

    2. Re:Tublr hosts porn? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      and no recommendations here. Lame.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Tublr hosts porn? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I didnt know

      You've been living under a rock?

  10. Re: Twice as many watched the porn and didn't shar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are the porn, adult vs art line drawn at?

    Intercourse
    Touching
    Suggestive
    Fetish
    Kissing
    Holding hands
    Frontal nudity
    Rear nudity
    Swimwear
    Side boob
    Model/athletic shots

    Is the line the same for m/f, f/f, m/m, etc?

  11. Could be more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am a dinosaur Yahoo user who still somewhat checks in for email via POP3. Saw lots of cool features like custom dynamic pages (remember when sites gave you a my.domain.com experience?), the acquisition of Geocities, the briefcases (which the private adult entertainment groups used to good extent but without worries about takedowns so often seen on modern Onedrive and other sites).

    Tumblr stopped receiving me some years back when their parent company Yahoo started "cleaning it up" for the shareholders' sake. Not immediately, mind you. Something similar happened to the pornography "Yahoo Groups" --delisting from Yahoo's trademark hand-curated categorized group directories --then everything sort of stagnates and dies while only spammers are left. Happened to usenet as ISP operators started delisting and then cut them off systematically. First Yahoo came hiding some public Tumblrs so indexers would delist and bookmarked URLs would be the only way in. But the way in was open to all. Eventually Yahoo started required us bookmark hoarders to log in.

    Today's risk of doxxing is great (think the Ashleymadison scandal) and though I trusted them 20 years ago when the web and real life didn't really match, and tracking was barely a thought in our minds, but these days regardless of whether my account is on the pown'd lists, it's not worth it.

    1. Re:Could be more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just use a fake name / email / pre paid credit card / voip phone number etc. no need to use your real name anywhere, I can't even remember my name.

    2. Re:Could be more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't even remember my name.

      LOL

  12. Boner by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Ask your dick. Your dick knows when you're watching porn.

    1. Re: Boner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your moms photo

    2. Re:Boner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Little Mermaid was porn when I was 12?

  13. What the by jwymanm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What is going on with crackdown on porn and free speach everywhere. Can't wait for more free distributed networks that will work around censorship.

    1. Re:What the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A porn ban is one of the few things that religious conservatives and radical feminists can agree upon. (And from their point of view, nobody else matters.)

    2. Re:What the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Feminists (especially the radical ones) are all about taking back pr0n, just not making it exclusively for mouth-breathing obese Republican types.

    3. Re: What the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. They're against it. Just see their posts. It's the 'anti SJW' types that say over and over again make it for everyone.

    4. Re:What the by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Same goal, but for very different reasons.

    5. Re:What the by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Has a free, distributed network ever worked for web sites?

      The most successful seems to be Tor hidden services, but even they are mostly hosted centrally and the difficulty accessing them has prevented them from ever going mainstream.

      You need to think of something better than distribution. It works for BitTorrent downloads/streaming but not for interactive, random access stuff like web sites where people have a tolerance of a fraction of a second for the page to load.

      Ideally it has to work with a normal browser because having to install anything will put most people off.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:What the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is going on with crackdown on porn and free speach everywhere.

      Islam got into the government and corporate boardrooms by calling itself feminism and social justice. NATO's governments are funding the crackdown as a national security policy because Muslims riot when they see a naked boobie, Muslims riot when they see atheists criticize Islam, Muslims riot when they see uncucked Jews like the ones at Breitbart and Rebel Media, etc. Some of the government's top national security advisors are on the payroll of Sheikh Al-Thani or Alwaleed bin Talal, who also have large stakes in media corporations and social media companies. This all started as a NATO-wide response to the Utoya massacre when Anders Breivik shot up a Muslim terrorist recruitment campaign hosted by the party running the Norwegian government.

      https://8ch.net/gamergatehq/re...

      https://8ch.net/gamergatehq/re...

    7. Re:What the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Feminists (especially the radical ones) are all about taking back pr0n . . .

      Real feminists wouldn't care what consenting women do with their body. It's their body, their choice, right?

      Those who would like to "take porn back" are, generally, insecure, dysfunctional feminists who feel the need to "fix" something in mainstream porn that isn't actually broken. They feel uncomfortable with the man taking the lead and showing dominance over the woman as happens in nature. Feminists would rather pervert and deform the natural act of sex just to make themselves feel better. It turns out it is they who are broken and need fixing . . .

      . . . just not making it exclusively for mouth-breathing obese Republican types.

      Only fat Republicans like mainstream porn? You may want to expand your world-view some . . .

    8. Re: What the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank goodness we have a rational, reasonable coterie to counter all the hateful extremism in the political arena. Well done, soldier.

    9. Re:What the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be an odd experience to have such limited cognitive capacity that everything you don't like collapses into a single nexus of "bad". Perhaps you should write a book about it. Or a manifesto.

  14. For the Mystery of Lawlessness is already working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is Winter Sunlight?

    For this reason, God sends them a powerful delusion(operation of wandering)(planet) so that they will believe the lie.
    Working of Error

  15. Re: Twice as many watched the porn and didn't shar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about gaping buttholes? Is that considered porn? What about feet pics?

    captcha: eyeful

  16. Brings up a good point by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    can they survive losing 28% of their audience? We're gonna find out.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Brings up a good point by jythie · · Score: 1

      I guess the big question will be how many people use the iOS app for non-porn browsing of Tumblr, since that is the group they did not want to lose.

    2. Re:Brings up a good point by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      Seems like they could've simply flagged the porn-containing accounts to make them not visible from the app with a note of explanation about Apple's terms.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    3. Re:Brings up a good point by jythie · · Score: 1

      Yeah. The only reason I can think of for why they did not do something iOS specific like that is some degree of technical debt or limitation that makes such a solution a lot more expensive to implement than it should be.

  17. Re: Twice as many watched the porn and didn't sha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you asking if buttholes turn you on?

    Maybe you are homosexual.

  18. Volume of use? by cirby · · Score: 2

    They talk about the number of users that follow porn versus the number who don't, but they don't really mention how much they consume.

    If that 1/4 accounts for half (or more) of the page views, and the other 3/4 is just people who drop in occasionally to look at their cousin's Photoshop gallery, they're going to be losing a lot more than 25% of their "audience."

  19. Re: Twice as many watched the porn and didn't sha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes
    Fetish feet, pits

  20. Influx of Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Straight-laced people will be encouraged to join a cleaner site. This will more than make up the difference.

    1. Re:Influx of Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the opposite is true.

      Remember Baker's Square? "Come for the fairly awful food, stay for the really awful pie" ?

      Tumblr has that going for it for the next two weeks, but after that, is anyone going stumble on cool art made with lettuce, ice cream, and a drill press if they didn't get there looking for dick pics?

  21. Yikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will fix this for you.

    "Wrong. Feminists (especially the radical ones) are all about taking back pr0n, just not making it exclusively for mouth-breathing obese Republican types."

    should read

    "Wrong. SOME feminists are all about taking back pr0n, rather than allowing to to be exclusively for mouth-breathing, obese Republican types."

    Feminism is a VERY wide tent. And on your 'radical' tag -- let's just skip give tagging people closer to the center and further from it as if there was actually a we-can-all-agree-on-it center.

    Less importantly -- I'm as much into fat-shaming as anyone, but aren't thin, bible-thumping Republican types just as into porn?

    1. Re:Yikes by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Putting liberal feminists and TERFs in a single tent is a bad idea, there will be blood.

    2. Re:Yikes by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      Remember just a couple years ago when all the actual women liked the word feminism and anyone who supported it but quickly distanced themselves from this or that wave feminism with all the extreme crazy men hating stuff?

      I'm pretty sure those days are gone, now I don't meet any of those women anymore.

    3. Re:Yikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      radical feminist is what the group he's talking about call themselves
      they're the ones that believe men are obsolete (as in literally)

    4. Re:Yikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's now "safer" to be a man hating lunatic fringe feminazi than it is to be a woman that likes men but still believes in equal (not female over male) rights. Women believing in actual equal rights keep that shit to themselves or their close friends. Saying anything like that in public nets you a beatdown from the "yes all men" crowd.

  22. Enter PornHub by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll be handily snapping up tumblr's userbase, along with all the SJW-infested shit that goes with it.

    This should be interesting to watch.

  23. Apple patents spunk detector... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To cut down on spunk related repairs. Our spunk detector says you spunked on your macbook/ipad so we're not going to repair it/them!

  24. Walked Away from Their Business Model by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    They won't be the first company to shed their skin and walk away from what made them.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
    1. Re:Walked Away from Their Business Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They sell you on freedom. But the "successful" are strait-laced and controlling. There needs to be an audience, and the freedom-loving ones are consuming things you daren't "sell" with shareholders' money.

      IPOs are the death of businesses with good, non-traditional ideas.

  25. Genital Recognition by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    Facial recognition tech can't identify genitalia? LOL

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  26. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1 in 4 data scientists were caught consuming porn, while the rest already finished.

  27. What Matters to Tumblr is Advertising Revenue by PastTense · · Score: 1

    What matters to Tumblr/Verizon is advertising revenue, not number of viewers--and the substantial majority of advertisers are not interested in being shown next to porn.

    1. Re:What Matters to Tumblr is Advertising Revenue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a substantial majority of advertisers don't want to advertise to empty air, too - losing the porn might not help them re: getting advertising revenue.

      tumblr thinking they can compete vs. instagram etc. once they "lose the porn" seems like wishful thinking to me.

    2. Re:What Matters to Tumblr is Advertising Revenue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The odd thing... I tried for 30 minutes to see ads on tumblr last night... nada.
      I did note the analytics surveillance engines with ublock turned off, went to their mainstream sites from those surveillance engines with ublock turned off.
      And every ad I saw was for companies I'd already shunned.

      JC Penney... nope stopped shopping there decades ago.
      Prudential... I deal with them when my employer's 401K is managed by prudential and I tend to ask my employer to find an alternative.
      CNET... been ignoring them for years.
      And then there were the ads that were cropped so I couldn't see the brand and I couldn't click through to discover the brand.

      And it's stupid. Tumblr has excellent porn curators within its bloggers with consistent content topics that would be a blessing for content targeted advertising (Like print advertising).

  28. Tumblr: when IT blocks pornhub.com by xski · · Score: 1

    RTTA.

  29. TUMBLR RACIST AGAINST PORN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are the pitch forks?!

  30. Obligatory xkcd quote... by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 2

    here.

  31. ORLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's too bad. I loved the ass & feet Tumblrs.

    There's always other sources anyway.

  32. Re: Twice as many watched the porn and didn't shar by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where are the porn, adult vs art line drawn at?

    If you lose interest in the art shortly after beating off, then it was porn.

    (Can't remember the origin of that quote)

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  33. Re:Why do they call it "adult" content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These people are not adults. They are emotionally stunted pervs, not role models for future generations.

    Found the prude. Probably watches and denies it.

  34. Decoder - Tumbler Decides to Die Slowly by jtm169 · · Score: 2

    Porn makes the Internet go round.
    Just turn off the safe filter in your favorite search engine. Porn site routinely make the top 10 of global web-site traffic. They are all high definition streaming services that innovate at an amazing rate. Mid-Video Advertisement technologies were born here. Complex tracking user identification was born here. Advanced graphics cards and huge fiber bandwidth data routing was not needed to serve up static text site in the 90's. It was needed to serve up porn, that's when the internet exploded and these high density bandwidth/compute technologies were given huge investments. The results of which advanced the ability to stream other video in a more mainstream market.

    In the 80's Betamax died when the porn industry went in with VHS. In the 2000's, Sony did not make the same mistake. They watched courted this market during the high density disc wars and Blu-Ray won. Even in the world of blockbuster movies and streaming, porn makes up the largest percent of physical removable media usage.

    However....many companies who live off this industry don't typically highlight it's importance to their bottom dollar.

    Watch it, don't watch it, like it, hate it. The content drives the investments in key technologies that we all benefit from in the "main stream".

  35. Re:Why do they call it "adult" content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He did a let's play of Okyakusama!? Kouryaku Taishou wa Achira Desu yo!!!

  36. A quarter? That's a conservative estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd probably say a quarter do not consume porn.

  37. vs App? by jythie · · Score: 1

    I wonder how these numbers compare to the percentage of people who only use Tumblr vs IOS app?

  38. Re: Twice as many watched the porn and didn't shar by Shaitan · · Score: 2

    But what if every time you look at it assess that you jerk off again? THEN is it porn or a masterpiece?

  39. Tumblr should have embraced the porn by secondhand_Buddah · · Score: 1

    Honestly, there is no other platform out there to share porn. Considering how much traffic porn generates, and the fact they owned porn sharing,
    Tumblr should have embraced it. Now they have destined themselves to be just another wannabe social media platform.

    --
    Participatory Governance : The only feasible option for a real democracy, where everyone really does have a say.
    1. Re:Tumblr should have embraced the porn by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Twitter doesn't censor porn altough an erotic cosplay model I follow said they shadow adult performers (apparently they're excluded from searches made from the Twitter page)

  40. Alternative Available Shortly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long before a clone of Tumblr that allows adult content appears?

    Building it from scratch should only take a few months.

    The only hard part is coming up with a catchy name.

    1. Re:Alternative Available Shortly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Rumblr. Too close? Okay, twin sites then: Bumpler for T and Rumpler for A. Be sure to reserve Bumblr domain for Tumblr management blogs.

    2. Re:Alternative Available Shortly by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      Gif-Sorting.xxx Of the 5 gif-centric pages listed by "The Porn Dude," only PornHub seems to be making an effort to be friendly towards users publishing albums of collected images, and they only seem to allow customization of the membership of an album, not other aspects of its layout or appearance. So, there's probably a market for a porn tumblr replacement.

  41. Re: Twice as many watched the porn and didn't shar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    both?

  42. Re: Twice as many watched the porn and didn't shar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you lose interest in the art shortly after beating off, then it was porn.

    Uh huh, so by that standard the Sears catalog ladies underwear section was porn?

    More importantly, who gives a shit about porn? Right, a bunch of old ladies and Republicans who demand the right to control what other people can do, even when that something has nothing to do with the whiny idiots who think it's their place to prevent people from touching themselves or someone else.

    It never ceases to astound me how the people who proclaim to want small government which stays out of the private lives of people are the ones most loudly trying to prevent other people from doing things they disapprove of.

    Why should I give a fuck what some moralizing asshole thinks about what I do in my own home? The obvious answer is I don't give a fuck what such idiots think, and I don't recognize their world view which justifies them intruding themselves into my life.

    Republicans who want to outlaw porn are no different to me than ISIS, trying to impose their religion on everyone else.

    Sorry, your god can kiss my ass, or tell it to me himself. Outside of that, shut the fuck up and mind your own fucking business.

  43. No comments about bad AI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their image recognition is very borked. Any skin that isn't a face is being flagged as porn.

    1. Re:No comments about bad AI? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      What's old is new. They've just brought back the flesh tone palette snooper. Porn hounds will just bring back inverted palettes, which make every porn model look like she's got a terrible disease (until fixed).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:No comments about bad AI? by sheramil · · Score: 1

      They've just brought back the flesh tone palette snooper.

      Good news for the full-body latex fetishists. Nary a skintone to be seen.

  44. As all things internet... by Xnet+Project · · Score: 1

    A clone will popup soon to take it's place with less restrictions eventually. As to how many, and what the names will be of said clones is the more prominent question.

  45. porn is here to stay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will never die. It was meant to be that way. Though I don't know why.

    I don't care what people say. Porn is here to stay

  46. R.I.P. by Doc+Right · · Score: 0

    So, adding margin of error, 25% of their users were ONLY there for porn. 30% were there for porn and other stuff. That leads me to believe the platform is now useless for about 40-50% of their users. Sounds to me like Tumblr is on its death bed.