Slashdot Mirror


The Future of Television? Binge-Watching is Only the Beginning (wsj.com)

With providers like Netflix, Hulu and Amazon, and more creative risks, network leaders are placing bets on how audience experience will evolve [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled]. From a report: "What might we see coming down the road?" says Beau Willimon, creator of The First, Hulu's sci-fi drama starring Sean Penn and Natascha McElhone. "Perhaps like [the characters] in my new show, we're all wearing augmented reality glasses, and we're experiencing television shows in a more intimate way -- a way that feels much more experiential than simply watching it on a rectangle."

[...] Television, as most people have known it for most of their lives, is no more. "At some point you'll get to a place where thinking about television from a linear standpoint will be like dial-up internet," says Hulu CEO Randy Freer. "It's a great time for content; not a great time for cable networks. I think what will happen is: Cable networks that have been able to create brands for themselves will have an opportunity to expand and figure out how they present to consumers."

Cable networks with a clear identity have a critical advantage in a subscription-based world, while networks with less-defined name recognition -- those that have been just another channel in the cable lineup -- will likely find it hard to entice the growing ranks of broadband-only consumers to buy an a la carte monthly subscription service. HBO is moving into the new era. "In the domestic market of the United States, where there is a surfeit of content more than ever, I personally think that brands matter more than ever," says HBO chairman and CEO Richard Plepler.

46 comments

  1. Watch kids to see the future of TV by mveloso · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you watch kids watch TV today, they watch TV in a completely non-linear way. They fast forward through stuff, rewind scenes and rewatch them, and essentially re-edit the show to what fits whatever's in their heads.

    The older kids have literally run out of TV; they've watched all the shows on Netflix.

    Once that happens to a large segment of the population the problem will be coming up with enough content to fill their day. How do you engage them? TV as we know it today isn't the answer.

    What's the point of having a Netflix subscription if you've watched everything? What's the point of HBO if there's nothing there? What's the point of network TV when you can just wait and watch all the shows you want in a day?

    A friend of mine is actually experimenting with microfiction, in an engagement experiment. It's been pretty fun so far, but does that work at scale?

    These are all pretty interesting problems.

    1. Re:Watch kids to see the future of TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no problems for the innovative, only opportunities.

    2. Re: Watch kids to see the future of TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that. Want to know when those problems will be solved because we are in a hurry

    3. Re: Watch kids to see the future of TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once the older kids run out of content from Netflix, they can toll YouTube and watch infomercials of 7yr olds unboxing toys...

      Maybe develop a heroin addiction once they consume all the YouTube.

    4. Re:Watch kids to see the future of TV by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I snorted. lol

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    5. Re:Watch kids to see the future of TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The older kids have literally run out of TV

      and advance to the next stage of life: porn

    6. Re:Watch kids to see the future of TV by RhettLivingston · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't think my 2 year old has ever watched actual TV, pbskids.org, Netflix, etc. but no TV. I noticed the other day that she routinely uses her finger to move the timeline at the bottom to what she wants. She always chooses what she wants and the choice seems to naturally grow to older shows (within the limits of the service which is kids stuff only).

      Interestingly, there is some pure entertainment content available, but she never chooses it. I've pulled it up and she seems bored with it.

      I am an extremely self-driven learner though, so she may have just inherited that tendency. It will be interesting to see how that works. I was extremely hampered in my childhood by lack of access to the materials I was interested in learning when I wanted to learn it. When I got my hands on something advanced, magic happened - like when I picked up my Dad's old College Algebra book during the summer after 5th grade and finished it that summer. She won't have that issue.

    7. Re:Watch kids to see the future of TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The older kids have literally run out of TV; they've watched all the shows on Netflix.

      Once that happens to a large segment of the population the problem will be coming up with enough content to fill their day. How do you engage them?

      What's the point of having a Netflix subscription if you've watched everything? What's the point of HBO if there's nothing there?

      If these people have watched everything on Netflix and HBO, then they must not have a life.

      I don't know anyone who has seen everything on Netflix.

      Perhaps these "older kids" need to get out of the house and find a job if they have that much free time.

    8. Re:Watch kids to see the future of TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you watch kids watch TV today, they watch TV in a completely non-linear way. They fast forward through stuff, rewind scenes and rewatch them, and essentially re-edit the show to what fits whatever's in their heads.

      The older kids have literally run out of TV; they've watched all the shows on Netflix.

      Once that happens to a large segment of the population the problem will be coming up with enough content to fill their day. How do you engage them? TV as we know it today isn't the answer.

      What's the point of having a Netflix subscription if you've watched everything? What's the point of HBO if there's nothing there? What's the point of network TV when you can just wait and watch all the shows you want in a day?

      A friend of mine is actually experimenting with microfiction, in an engagement experiment. It's been pretty fun so far, but does that work at scale?

      These are all pretty interesting problems.

      try watching netflix in denmark, its double the price of the US and it is less than 1/4 of the content... so its more like 8 times more expensive... but we have no real alternatives, so we just have to take what we can get...

    9. Re:Watch kids to see the future of TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you're just awesome, and your kid is going to be awesome as well. Or insufferable ... yeah, most likely insufferable...

  2. Re:DRINK MORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good strategy. Beer goggles until you pass out.

  3. Um . . . No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is actually a human threshold in terms of these things. These people aren't any less crass or ridiculous than their predecessors. The method of delivery may be different, but absolutely nothing has changed. In fact, the mentality is probably the worst its ever been due to the fact that it is now completely divirced from reality. It's ok, no one can change nature and all of the technocrats will eventually hit the walls that others did before them. Having to watch millennials go through the awkward stages of their lives publicly is just a tad annoying, particularly given that no matter their age or how much time passes, they seem to make zero progress emotionally or intellectually. There are definitely neural pathways missing, thanks, *your parents*.

    1. Re:Um . . . No by CaptainDork · · Score: 0

      Have some kids.

      Come back when you're an authority and not an armchair asshole.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  4. Re: DRINK MORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have BOTH Netflix and Hulu? I am having double vision

  5. Sports!!! NBC bought the rights, but won't show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NBC bought the rights to my favorite sport, but won't show any of the contests, except the "Worlds" and then they only follow the USA team and top 2 other competitors, not the entire meet.

    Because they have the rights inside the USA, I can't subscribe to the world-wide streaming service, that streams every contest live and retains them for later viewing. A US-based credit card is prohibited, GeoLocked.

    CATV is dead. We get 90+ channel with a attic antenna.

    Streaming services are about convenience. If we want to watch a 15 yr old TV series 2 episodes each evening, it is available. It is only the "new" series that we need wait. I much prefer having the entire season released over a few days, if not at once. The Patriot and Sneaky Pete, for example.

  6. Brace Yourselves: Twitch is coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just spent a whole afternoon watching GDQ speed runs and it was legitimately more entertaining that anything I've seen on TV in the last five years.
    What shows to they even make anymore? Another cyberpunk style stundent flick with twenty-something sexy-heroes being emotional about events or something. I can't even accept that pre-teens find this shit watchable anymore.
    Like the news industry, the entertainment industry has also fallen off a cliff in the wake of the democratisation of media creation and distribution. I have no idea why this happens, but it just seems that, in the face of competition from the internet, traditional providers paradoxically don't step up but actually implode. There must be another structural factor at work. All the actually creative people stay at home or get drowned out or just sense the death of the industry in question and choose to avoid it.

    No way I pay $60 a month for 300 channels of garbage. Even the baby boomers are getting bored of channel flipping now.

  7. "People of Importance" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see your virtual-augmented-reality glasses and raise you the neural interface-enabled full body experience, lying in a stupor while "experiencing" someone else's scripted life.

    1. Re: "People of Importance" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds good, but what we all want right now is to be right there in the room with Will and Grace.

    2. Re:"People of Importance" by Calydor · · Score: 1

      At that point we may as well get Sword Art Online.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  8. Remember linear books? by reanjr · · Score: 2

    Remember back when books were linear, but the the technical revolution of Choose Your Own Adventure overturned hundreds of years of the art form by giving the reader just what they had always wished for: editorial control over the art they consume.

    1. Re: Remember linear books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interactive entertainment is the biggest threat to the creative wing of the MSM. People under 30 are watching live streams and other people playing games.

      Creative media won't go away, but nobody will be paying monthly for a bunch of linear programming in ten years. The cable operators and telcos will become fancy ISPs. Bruce Springsteen was right decades ago: 57 channels and nothing on.

    2. Re:Remember linear books? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Remember back when books were linear, but the the technical revolution of Choose Your Own Adventure overturned hundreds of years of the art form by giving the reader just what they had always wished for: editorial control over the art they consume.

      I remember those books as just containing a lot of story paths, written by others, and I wanted to (and did) pretty much explore them all.

      It was new and different, and really cool, but I figured out pretty quickly that I wasn't really choosing my own adventure so much as reading a lot of story variants spun out of the same basic premise.,

  9. Bread and circuses by ZombieCatInABox · · Score: 2

    Bread and circuses. Keep the population well fed and entertained, and you shall rule the world.

  10. First person viewer by petes_PoV · · Score: 2, Funny
    The future of TV is where the viewer becomes part of the show (at least, in their version of it).

    It is the logical combination of traditional story-telling and video games. The "viewer" gets to see the programme through the eyes of whichever participant they choose. That might be a bystander, or they might be a character, That would give scope for a viewer to alter the storyline, so there may have to be ways to either set it back on track or to simply allow the viewer to make their own show. I can see both possibilities, eventually.

    When all the actors are avatars which are downloaded and run rather than simply being a series of images shown in quick succession, along with the scenery and the story, then TV watching will become a much more immersive experience.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:First person viewer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Gaming is the future? I'll buy that.

    2. Re:First person viewer by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      The delivery medium changes habits. Since netflix, I watch a series until it gets boring, how ever many episodes and the swap to another, to watch until it get boring and then swap again, maybe back to the first. Is that binge watching or not, it gives a good sense of series development and when that series becomes a bit stale due to extended exposure the ability to swap.

      News, the internet and I take my pick, as a rule of thumb avoiding all US main stream media channels as well as UK ones and then what ever turns up from the rest of the world in English.

      Sport, well, fuck that, had enough of jock strap fuckwits in school why bother there in after, dumb as rocks, not worth talking to, so why watch them, play as children to be lorded by mainstream media for their marketing ability, boring, boring, boring.

      On the internet, get bored with netflix, play a game, interact on forums or in a limited capacity interact with social media. The internet is not just Netflix but Netflix is part of the internet channel from a users viewpoint. American news, stop bullshitting for a few years and people might start listening again and Youtube faking your numbers and fucking up everyone's news search to put you in front, wont win anyone, people stopped watching for a reason. Suck it up main stream media News channel, you are just another association of bloggers, get over yourselves.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  11. Bleah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What might we see coming down the road?" says Beau Willimon, creator of The First, Hulu's sci-fi drama starring Sean Penn and Natascha McElhone. "Perhaps like [the characters] in my new show, we're all wearing augmented reality glasses, and we're experiencing television shows in a more intimate way -- a way that feels much more experiential than simply watching it on a rectangle."

    Remember SimStim, the fully immersive entertainment technology in William Gibson's novel Neuromancer? There was a character who still watched television, and when asked why, she replied, "SimStim is just one more thing I want to escape from."

  12. end of net neutrality should help those companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's a good thing net neutrality is dead, otherwise how would these companies stay in existence!

  13. Re: DRINK MORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    GOP is dead. There is no GOP. What was called the Republican party is the Trump party. It will end when he is gone. What takes its place is anyone's guess. It has run its course. Not enough morons to cheat anymore. A good thing.

  14. the future of tv? perhaps something like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    videodrome

  15. Re: DRINK MORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

  16. Church Windows? by mark_reh · · Score: 0

    The next big thing.

  17. "Watch the kids - observe retards" -Chinese saying by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Much like Randy up there.
    People who hear "television" and think "tv shows".
    The equivalent of people hearing "newspapers" and thinking "funnies".

    At some point you'll get to a place where thinking about television from a linear standpoint will be like dial-up internet," says Hulu CEO Randy Freer.

    Television is NOT sitcoms and movies.
    News will always be linear.
    Sports will always be linear.
    Current and live events, be they annual things like music festivals, elections or talk shows or even things like "reality" shows - those will always be linear.
    Because time is.

    Watching how a five- or ten-year-old (or a clueless CEO) uses an information medium may be interesting from an anthropological point - but it does not determine the medium.
    It's like saying that since everyone can now listen to podcasts and music on their portable mp3 CD players with full two minutes of anti-shock readahead - no one will listen to the radio anymore, grandpa.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  18. Re: DRINK MORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I look forward to the suede/denim secret police coming for your uncool niece. You'll go quietly to the camp, you'll make a nice drawstring lamp. Don't worry it's just a shower, and for your clothes a pretty flower.

    DIE on organic poison gas
    Serpent's egg's already hatched
    You will croak, you little clown
    When you mess with President Brown
    When you mess with President Brown

    California Über Alles
    California Über Alles
    Über Alles California
    Über Alles California

  19. VR Goggles = 3DTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VR goggles will never, ever, ever happen until they can be implanted directly into the retinas.

    I've been in tech for 35+ years, seen trends like this come and go (remember the mind-controlled mouse?), and VR goggles ain't gonna happen for TV.

  20. Re:"Watch the kids - observe retards" -Chinese say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Television is NOT sitcoms and movies.
    News will always be linear.
    Sports will always be linear.

    There is only a little bit of news each day, when you have seen it, you're done with news. News channels are repeat repeat repeat, not something you watch for long.

    Sports are linear, and therefore will be avoided. It is entertainment, and entertainment is going non-linear. Sports was lifted by the popularity of linear media. Linear goes away, so sports fall back to pre- mass media levels.

  21. Give it up for the rectangle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I liked the rectangle. It was a nice reminder that this was, after all, just a television show, and the border was important because it kept elements out of the picture which are often more important than what is in it. But I'm in a new immersive world because we've thrown out our television together with its shitty violence, titties, and pickup truck commercials. It's just the gui internet now, and I get my rectangle back. One more step and it will be just the real world and an amber screen command line. Ahhhhh.

  22. Re:"Watch the kids - observe retards" -Chinese say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linear goes away, so sports fall back to pre- mass media levels.

    Do you have any evidence of a drop in sports viewing?
    I thought sports was the only reason people still have cable TV.

  23. The Future of pre-recorded TV is the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Future of pre-recorded TV is the same as the past of pre-recorded TV, but the future of "TV" is in twitch where you can interact and even by guided by your audience.

  24. Content hour calculation by mveloso · · Score: 1

    Friends: 236 episodes, which at a generous 50 minutes/episode comes out to about 492 content hours. That's 20 days of 24-hour-a-day watching. 4 hours a day = 123 days of watching.

    That's assuming that it's all worth watching.

    When you're a kid that's unsupervised or watching in the background, that's 4 hours a day for almost half of the school year. That's not much.

  25. Smellevision Replaces Televsion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    âoeCarl Stalling sez itâ(TM)ll never work!â